| Word Document PDF Document |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
March 3, 2010 Draft Resolution W-4828 Agenda ID #9262
TO: All Interested Parties
Enclosed is draft Resolution W-4828 of the Division of Water and Audits. It will be on the Commission's April 8, 2010 agenda. The Commission may act then act on this resolution or it may postpone action until later.
When the Commission acts on a draft resolution, it may adopt all or part of it as written, amend, modify or set it aside and prepare a different resolution. Only when the Commission acts does the resolution become binding on the parties.
Parties to this matter may submit comments on this draft resolution. An original and two copies of the comments, with a certificate of service, should be submitted to:
Division of Water and Audits, Third Floor
Attention: Adam Thaler
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Parties may submit comments on or before March 23, 2010. The date of submission is the date the comments are received by the Division of Water and Audits. Parties must serve a copy of their comments on the service list on the same date that the comments are submitted to the Division of Water and Audits.
Comments shall be limited to five pages in length plus a subject index listing the recommended changes to the draft resolution, a table of authorities and appendix setting forth the proposed findings and ordering paragraphs.
Comments shall focus on the factual, legal, or technical errors in the draft resolution, and shall make specific reference to the record or applicable law. Comments which fail to do so will be accorded no weight and are not to be submitted.
Persons interested in comments of parties may write to Adam Thaler or telephone him at (415) 703-3034.
Rami Kahlon, Director
Division of Water and Audits
Enclosures: Draft Resolution W-4828
Certificate of Service
Service List
WATER/RSK/JB5/AJT/jl DRAFT AGENDA ITEM #9262
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DIVISION OF WATER AND AUDITS RESOLUTION NO. W-4828
Water and Sewer Advisory Branch April 8, 2010
(RES. W-4828), CENTRAL WATER SYSTEM (CWS). ORDER AUTHORIZING A GENERAL RATE INCREASE (GRC), PRODUCING AN INCREASE OF $7,972 OR 51.5% IN TEST YEAR (TY) 2010.
By Draft Advice Letter filed on October 29, 2009, CWS seeks to increase its rates for water service to recover increased operating expenses and earn an adequate return on its plant investment. The Division of Water and Audits (Division) accepted this draft advice letter as complete for filing on November 16, 2009.
This resolution grants an increase of $7,972 or 51.5%, for TY 2010 revenue of $23,460 with a resulting rate of margin of 13.5%.
CWS has 42 single-family residential customers, all with a 5/8-inch flat-rate service connection. The present rates will increase from $32.00 per month to $46.55 per month, yielding a monthly increase of $14.55 or 45.5%.
CWS, a Class D water utility, has requested authority under General Order 96-B, Rule 7.6.2 and Water Industry Rule 7.3.3(5), and Section 454 of the Public Utilities Code to increase its water rates by $7,972 or 51.5% in TY 2010. The purpose of the rate increase is to recover increased operating expenses and to provide an adequate rate of return. CWS' request shows 2008 gross revenues of $15,488 at present rates, increasing to $23,460 at proposed rates. CWS is requesting a rate of margin of 13.5%.
The present rates were established on March 16, 2004 by the last general rate increase which was granted pursuant to Res. W-4461, which authorized a rate increase of $2,015, or 14.3%, resulting in a rate of return on rate base of 12.61%.
CWS serves approximately 42 residential flat rate customers in the community of Strathmore about eight miles northwest of Porterville, Tulare County.
The Division made an independent analysis of CWS' operating expenses, taxes, depreciation, and rate base. Appendix A shows CWS' and the Division's estimates of the summary of earnings at present, requested, and recommended rates for 2010.
A notice of the proposed rate increase was hand-delivered to each customer on or about November 24, 2009. Twenty-eight customers (two-thirds of the customers) filed protests in response to the notice. The protests raised concerns about the affordability of increasing rates to $46.55 per month which are nearly twice what nearby residences pay for water. A number of the protests raised concerns about inadequate water pressure and that there is no notice when water is going to be unavailable on the system.
An informal public meeting was held Thursday, February 4, 2010, at the Porterville Library located at 41 West Thurman Avenue, in Porterville, CA. The meeting started at 5:35 PM with six customers in attendance. The Division representative, Adam Thaler, explained Commission procedures, as well as the purpose of the meeting. Then Veronica and Angel Gonzalez, representatives of CWS, made a presentation to explain the need for the rate increase. The rest of the meeting consisted of comments and questions by the customers. Most of the questions and comments were general in nature and dealt with CWS' revenues and expenses, and requested increase. The meeting adjourned at 7:00 PM.
The Division made an independent analysis of CWS' operations. Appendix A shows CWS' and the Division's estimated summary of earnings at present, proposed, and recommended rates for TY 2010.
In Decision (D.) 92-03-093 effective April 30, 1992, the Commission adopted the Return on Margin (ROM) ratemaking as an alternate to the Return on Net Investment (Rate Base) method for Class C and Class D Utilities and recommended that the Division use the method that produces the higher result.
CWS has virtually no ratebase and requested a ROM of 13.5%, well below the recommended ROM of 24% for a Class D Utility. CWS desires to be sensitive to its ratepayers in this case as this is a low-income community. The owner and his daughter
are actively running this water system and have not had a salary since acquiring the utility. The salaries requested are minimal and only recorded expenses, with no escalation for 2010, are being requested.
CWS' current rate structure consists of standard flat rate service. The rates proposed by the Division are shown in Appendix B.
At the Division's recommended rates shown in Appendix B, the bill for a 5/8-inch customer would increase from $32.00 to $46.55, which is $14.55, or 45.5% in TY 2010. A comparison of customer bills at present and recommended rates is shown in Appendix C. The adopted quantities and tax calculations are shown in Appendix D.
EXPENSES
CWS desires to be sensitive to the ratepayers in the community and has not requested any escalation or increase in expenses over what was adopted in the previous GRC in 2004.
Office and Management Salaries
The owner and his daughter have been actively running this water facility since it was acquired and have not requested any salary in its previous filings. Office and Management salaries are requested to be increased as follows:
Present Proposed
Office Salaries $0 $2,500
Management Salaries $0 $5,070
Office Salaries
Veronica Gonzalez assists with the correspondence, filing, and assists Angel Gonzalez in operating the water system. CWS estimates that Ms. Gonzalez works a minimum of a six-hour work week on water company related activities for the 2010 test year. An hourly estimated rate of $8 (minimum wage) was requested by CWS.
CWS requests $2,500 for Office Salaries for Test Year 2010.
Management Salaries
Mr. Angel Gonzalez actively manages and operates the water system. Mr. Gonzalez performs most of the repairs and maintenance requirements. An hourly estimated rate of $15 per hour was requested by CWS. CWS estimates that Mr. Gonzalez will spend approximately 10 hours per week on utility related activities for TY 2010. CWS adjusted the number of hours per week in its request downward to 6.5 hours per week to ease the effect on rates.
CWS requests $5,070 for Management Salaries for TY 2010.
The salaries requested above are reasonable and should be adopted.
RATEBASE AND PLANT INVESTMENT
CWS did not request any new ratebase or plant investment in this advice letter.
CWS has no outstanding compliance orders. Though utility has been filing annual reports as required, these reports are deficient in a number of aspects. The Division should assign an auditor to work with CWS to bring its annual reports into compliance.
No complaints due to water service or rates have been filed with the Commission's Consumer Affairs Branch. During the rate case evaluation process, CWS was responsive to queries made by the Division.
Public Utilities Code §311(g)(1) provides that this resolution be served on all parties and subject to at least 30 days public review and comment prior to a vote of the Commission. Public Utilities Code §311(g) (2) provides that this 30-day period may be waived or reduced upon stipulation of all parties in the proceeding.
The 30-day comment period for the draft resolution was neither waived nor reduced. Accordingly, the draft resolution was provided to parties for comments, and will be placed on the Commission's agenda no earlier than 30 days from the date of mailing the resolution to the parties.
1. The Division of Water and Audits made an independent analysis of Central Water System's operations.
2. Appendix A shows Central Water System's and the Division of Water and Audits' estimated summary of earnings at present, proposed, and recommended rates for test year 2010.
3. The Division of Water and Audits staff reviewed operating revenues and expenses.
4. Staff verified the operating expenses by reviewing supporting documents for substantiation and accuracy, and included the amounts that were deemed reasonable and prudent.
5. The recorded amounts for Accounts 670 and 671, Office Salaries and Management Salaries, respectively, are $0 (zero dollars) at present rates.
6. Central Water System requests to establish Office Salaries and Management Salaries of $2,500 and $5,070, respectively.
7. The request to establish a total of $7,570 for combined Office and Management Salaries is reasonable and should be adopted.
8. Central Water System has 42 unmetered (flat-rate) customers.
9. The Division of Water and Audits recommended summary of earnings (Appendix A) is reasonable and should be adopted.
10. Central Water System did not request any new ratebase or plant investment in this proceeding.
11. Central Water System proposed a Rate of Margin of 13.5%.
12. The Division of Water and Audits' recommendation of a 13.5% rate of margin is reasonable and should be adopted.
13. The rates recommended by the Division of Water and Audits (Appendix B) are reasonable and should be adopted.
14. The quantities (Appendix D) used to develop the Division of Water and Audits' recommendations are reasonable and should be adopted.
15. Central Water System's draft advice letter request was protested by 28 customers.
16. The draft resolution grants the relief requested by Central Water System.
17. Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 311(g) (1), the draft resolution was sent for public comment.
18. The annual reports for Central Water System are deficient. The Division of Water and Audits should assign an auditor to work with the Company to bring the annual reports into compliance.
1. Authority is granted under Public Utilities Code Section 454 to Central Water System to file a Tier 1 advice letter incorporating the summary of earnings and the revised rate schedules attached to this Resolution as Appendices A and B, respectively, and concurrently cancel its presently effective Schedule 1, General Metered Service, and Schedule 2, Flat Rate Service. The effective date of the revised rate schedules shall be five days after the date of its filing.
2. This resolution is effective today.
I certify that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted at a conference of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California held on April 8, 2010; the following Commissioners voting favorably thereon:
PAUL CLANON
Executive Director

APPENDIX B-1
Central Water System
Schedule No. 1
GENERAL METERED SERVICE
Test Year 2010
APPLICABILITY
Applicable to all metered water service.
TERRITORY
Tract No. 247, and vicinity, adjacent to Cairns Road approximately four miles west of the community of Strathmore, Tulare County.
RATES
Quantity Rates:
Per Meter
Per Month
All water used per 100 cu. ft ...................... $ 1.58 (I)
Service Charge:
For 5/8 x ¾-inch meter .............................. $ 22.89 (I)
For ¾-inch meter .............................. $ 34.34 |
For 1-inch meter ............................... $ 57.23 |
For 1-1/2-inch meter .............................. $114.46 |
For 2-inch meter ............................... $183.12 (I)
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. All bills are subject to the reimbursement fee set forth in Schedule No. UF.
APPENDIX B-2
Central Water System
Schedule No. 2
FLAT RATE SERVICE
Test Year 2010
APPLICABILITY
Applicable to all water service furnished on flat rate basis.
TERRITORY
Tract No. 247, and vicinity, adjacent to Cairns Road approximately four miles west of the community of Strathmore, Tulare County.
RATES
Per-Service Connection
Per Month
For each single-family residence ....................................... $46.55 (I)
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. The above residential flat rate charges apply to service connections not larger than one-inch diameter.
2. All service not covered by the above classifications will be furnished only on a metered basis.
3. Meters may be installed at the option of the utility in which event service thereafter will be rendered only on the basis of Schedule No. 1, General Metered Service.
4. All bills are subject to the reimbursement fee set forth in Schedule No. UF.
APPENDIX C
Central Water System
COMPARISON OF RATES
Test Year 2010
A comparison of the present and Branch's recommended rates is shown below:
Monthly bill for a flat rate customer:
Present Recommended
Rates Rates Amount Percent Increase
$32.00 46.55 $14.55 45.5%
APPENDIX D
Central Water System
ADOPTED QUANTITIES
Test Year 2010
1. Purchased Power
Total Cost $2,974
2. Water Sales in CCF Not Applicable
3. Payroll
Employee Labor $ 0
Office Salaries $2,500
Management Salaries $5,070
Service Connections - Flat Rate Service
5/8 " 42
3/4" 0
1" 0
1-1/2" 0
2" 0
3" 0
Total: 42
Adopted Tax Calculation Test Year 2010
1. Operating Revenues $23,460
2. Expenses $18,280
3. Taxes other than income $ 458
4. Depreciation $ 877
5. Taxable Income for State Tax $ 3,845
6. State Tax (min 800) $ 800
7. Taxable Income for FIT $ 3,045
8. Federal Tax $ 457
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I have by mail this day served a true copy of draft Resolution W-4828 on all parties in these filings or their attorneys as shown on the attached list.
Dated March 3, 2010, at San Francisco, California.
JOSIE L. JONES
Parties should notify the Division of Water and Audits, Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 3106, San Francisco, CA 94102, of any change of address to insure that they continue to receive documents. You must indicate the Resolution number of the service list on which your name appears.
SERVICE LIST
DRAFT RESOLUTION W-4828
Angel M. Gonzalez
Owner
Central Water System
1102 N. Prospect Street
PORTERVILLE, CA 93257
Robert S. Fortino
President
Del Oro Water Company
Drawer 5172
CHICO, CA 95927
Thomas Smegal
California Water Service Company
1720 North First Street
SAN JOSE, CA 95108
All Customers of Central Water System via hand delivery (this includes all protesters and attendees of the public meeting).