Word Document PDF Document |
Word Document PDF Document |
ALJ/MEB/tcg Date of Issuance 12/17/2010
Decision 10-12-039 December 16, 2010
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Application of Southern California Edison Company (U338E) for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities With Voltages Between 50 kV and 200 kV: Mascot Substation Project. |
Application 09-11-020 (Filed November 25, 2009) |
DECISION ADDRESSING THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
THE MASCOT SUBSTATION PROJECT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
DECISION ADDRESSING THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
THE MASCOT SUBSTATION PROJECT 22
4. Notice and Procedural Issues 55
6. Proposed Facilities Description 77
7.1. Proponent's Environmental Assessment 88
7.2. Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 99
7.3. Mitigation, Monitoring, Reporting and Compliance Plan 99
7.4. Electric and Magnetic Fields 1010
9. Proceeding Category, Need for Hearings 1414
10. Waiver of Comment Period 1414
DECISION ADDRESSING THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
THE MASCOT SUBSTATION PROJECT
This decision grants Application 09-11-020 by Southern California Edison Company (SCE) for a permit to construct the proposed project known as the Mascot Substation Project (Proposed Project), pursuant to General Order 131-D, in unincorporated Kings County, California. Approval of this Application allows SCE to construct additional transmission capacity serving the City of Hanford and unincorporated Kings County to ensure that customer electrical demand can be met safely and reliably.
The Proposed Project includes:
1. Construction of a new 66/12 kilovolt (kV) distribution substation.
2. Construction of three new 66 kV subtransmission line segments to serve the new Mascot Substation.
3. Construction of four new 12 kV distribution circuits, and
4. Facilities to connect the new substation to SCE's existing telecommunication system.
As the Lead Agency for environmental review, we find the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Proposed Project meets the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.1
This proceeding is closed.
1 Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.