|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
Ratesetting
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 144
(only the most current 100 are displayed)
Display all documents for this proceeding
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Navajo Nation's Application for Rehearing of Decision 04-03-037.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
for D04-03-037.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/CAGEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
on draft decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision approving FERC decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision adopting FERC's changes to the Mountainview Power Purchase Agreement.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on ALJ Draft Decision adopting FERC's changes to the Mountainview Power Purchase Agreement approved in D.03-15-059.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Adopting FERC's changes to the Mountainview Power Purchase Agreement, etc. Comments are due March 9, 2004; no reply comments will be accepted.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On February 25, 2004, Ann P. Cohn, Associate General Counsel of Southern California Edison Company, had a telephone conversation with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey. ALJ Carol Brown also participated in the communication. Cohn informed the Commission that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has issued its decision on the Mountainview application.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
For An Award Of Compensation
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to various Applications for Rehearing of Decision 03-12-059.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
ORA/CAGEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
[of D03-12-059].
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
of D03-12-059.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
of D03-12-059.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
of D03-12-059.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown and alternate of Cmmr. Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply; on alternate of Cmmr. Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
PUBLIC VERSION. Reply comments on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
CONFIDENTIAL VERSION. SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER. Reply comments on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; to the Lynch Alternate Proposed Decision in [Edison's] Mountainview Application.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 2003
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On December 10, 2003, Douglas Kerner, attorney for Independent Energy Producers Association (IEP), met with Cmmr. Lynch in San Francisco. Also present were Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, and Steven Kelly, Policy Director of IEP. IEP stated its position and concerns with respect to Cmmr. Lynch's alternate. IEP expressed its primary view that utility procurement should occur through an open, transparent and competitive process, irrespective of the payment or cost recovery structure of the project resultant from that process.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On December 2, 2003, Mike Hoover, Director, Regulatory Affairs, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Hoover reiterated SCE's position that ratebasing Mountainview was not a viable option going forward and that the Commission should adopt SCE's proposed power purchase agreement.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On December 9, 2003, Bruce Foster, Vice President, Regulatory Operations, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Cmmr. Lynch in San Francisco. Also present were Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, and Ann Cohn, Associate General Counsel, Gary Schoonyan, Director, and Tom Burhenn, Manager, Regulatory Operations, SCE. SCE representatives expressed its support for the proposed decision (PD) over the alternate. SCE representatives stated that it was unable and unwilling to acquire Mountainview as a directly-owned asset until the customer base stability and cost recovery issues had been addressed. SCE representatives explained that there were negative consequences to SCE and its customers if Mountainview was not acquired through a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)-jurisdictional affiliate. Responding to a concern over FERC making changes to the power purchase agreement, SCE representatives noted that the PD prevents SCE from executing the contract if FERC makes changes that affect ra
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the Alternate Proposed Decision of Commissioner Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
|
|
Description:
on the Alternate Proposed Decision of Commissioner Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Lynch.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
On December 8, 2003, Mark Fogelman of Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, P.C., attorneys for the Navajo Nation, met with Cmmr. Kennedy in San Francisco. Also present were Ross LaJeunesse, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Christine Hammond of Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, P.C. Fogelman stated that, among the many legal errors, is the proposed decision's (PD) failure to include a comparative analysis between Mountainview and other feasible energy alternatives, such as the Mohave Generating Station, in violation of Public Utilities Code Section 1001, the California Environmental Quality Act, and the Public Utility Holding Company Act. Fogelman noted that undisputed record evidence shows that Mohave is more cost-effective than Mountainview. Fogelman also communicated the Navajo Nation's concern that Southern California Edison Company's (SCE) Mountainview Application would prejudice the future of the Mohave Generating Station. In view of the likelihood that the final decision will be overturned on appeal if the PD remains unch
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; [on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.]
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Lynch.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
in opposition to the proposed decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/CAGEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
[on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.]
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
[on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.]
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
opening; on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
SEQUOIA GENERATING COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
SILICON VALLEY MANUFACTURING GROUP
|
|
Description:
[on the proposed decision].
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the Proposed Decision (PUBLIC VERSION).
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
|
|
Description:
on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
On December 3, 2003, Mark Fogelman of Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, P.C., attorneys for the Navajo Nation, met with Cmmr. Lynch in San Francisco. Also present was Christine Hammond of Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, P.C. Fogelman stated that, among the many legal errors, are the proposed decision's (PD) failure to include a comparative analysis between Mountainview and other feasible energy alternatives, such as the Mohave Generating Station, in violation of Public Utilities Code Section 1001, the California Environmental Quality Act, and the Ashbacker Doctrine. Fogelman noted that undisputed record evidence shows that Mohave is more cost-effective than Mountainview. Fogelman also communicated the Navajo Nation's concern that Southern California Edison Company's Mountainview Application would prejudice the future of the Mohave Generating Station.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA SMALL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
CALIFORNIA SMALL BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
|
|
Description:
for leave to intervene; comments on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown attached.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Brown.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
On December 1, 2003, Mark Fogelman of Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, P.C., attorneys for the Navajo Nation, met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and Christine Hammond of Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, P.C. Fogelman stated that, among the many legal errors, are the proposed decision's (PD) failure to include a comparative analysis between Mountainview and other feasible energy alternatives, such as the Mohave Generating Station, in violation of Public Utilities Code Section 1001, the California Environmental Quality Act, and the Ashbacker Doctrine. Fogelman noted that undisputed record evidence shows that Mohave is more cost-effective than Mountainview. Fogelman also communicated the Navajo Nation's concern that Southern California Edison Company's (SCE) Mountainview Application not be allowed to 'leapfrog' SCE's Mohave application (A02-05-046). In view of the likelihood that the final decision will be overturned on appeal if the PD remains unchanged, Fogelm
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 2003
|
Filed By:
CMMR/LYNCH/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion granting in part and denying in part Southern California Edison Company's application. Comments are due December 11, 2003, reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
December 3, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MINKIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
of final oral argument.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
December 3, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Grant of Request for Ex Parte Meeting.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
November 26, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
olf grant of request for ex parte meeting.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
November 26, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
of grant of request for ex parte meeting.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 20, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants TURN's motion to accept late-filed notice of intent to claim compensation. Finds that TURN is eligible to claim compensation.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 20, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Clarifies that comments to the proposed decision of ALJ Brown issued November 18, 2003, may be filed 20 days after the mail date, and reply comments - 5 days thereafter.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion granting Edison's application to acquire Mountainview Power Company, LLC (MVL) as a wholly owned subsidiary and to enter into a power purchase agreement with MVL. Comments are due by December 8, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Motion of Nevada Hydro Company et al. for intervention and comments.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
|
|
Description:
[opening].
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
concurrent, opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/CAGEN/OBIORA/PUC
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
concurrent opening: PUBLIC VERSION WITH REDACTIONS. Confidential Version Subject to Protective Order in A03-07-032 Filed Under Seal.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
concurrent.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISAON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for the Commission to Take Official Notice.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
NEVADA HYDRO COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Description:
to intervene and comments on Edison's plants to purchase the Mountainview Power facility.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EIDSON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[Confidential Version] in support its application.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
in support of [this] Application. (PUBLIC VERSION).
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
SEQUOIA GENERATING COMPANY, LLC
|
|
Description:
post-hearing.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
concurrent.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
[opening].
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
[opening].
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 2003
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
transcript corrections.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
Declaration of R. Thomas Beach.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION.
|
|
Description:
Declaration of Dr. Barbara R. Barkovich.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to motion of Energy Producers Coalition for an order compelling the production of a non-redacted version of the application, testimony, and workpapers.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
SEQUOIA GENERATING COMPANY, LLC
|
|
Description:
in opposition to Motion of the Energy Producers and Users Coalition for an order compelling the production of a non-redacted version of the Application, testimony, and workpapers.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
to ALJ's request for comments on motions to compel confidential data.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to ALJ Brown's inquiry re protective order.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Motions of Independent Energy Producers and Energy Producers and Users Coalition to Compel Production of Unredacted Application, Testimony and Workpapers.
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 2003
|
Filed By:
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
for an order compelling the production of a non-redacted version of the application, testimony and workpapers.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 10, 2003
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for acceptance of a late-filed notice of intent to claim compensation; notice of intent attached.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 25, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Clarifies Scoping Memo.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 19, 2003
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On September 19, 2003, Douglas Kerner, attorney for Independent Energy Producers Association, sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Kennedy. Copies of the letter were also sent to Cmmrs. Peevey, Brown, Lynch and Wood, and Brian Prusnek and Ross LaJeunesse, advisors to Cmmr. Kennedy. The letter provided information related to the Commission's future oversight of Southern California Edison's proposal to develop the Mountainview power plant.
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 16, 2003
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Affirms that this is a ratesetting proceeding. Sets the following schedule: evidentiary hearings start October 14, 2003; concurrent opening briefs - 10/31, concurrent reply briefs - 11/7/3, final decision - 12/18/2003. Denies the IEP's motion for consolidation.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On September 10, 2003, Bruce Foster, Vice President, Regulatory Operations, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy. Copies of the letter were also sent to Cmmrs. Peevey, Brown, Lynch, and Wood, and to Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, David Gamson and Belinda Gatti, advisors to Cmmr. Brown, Michael Campbell and Aaron Johnson, advisors to Cmmr. Lynch, Ross LaJeunesse, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Manuel Ramirez and Steven Weissman, advisors to Cmmr. Wood. The letter responds to a question raised at the all-party meeting requesting further information as to how a catastrophic even at the Mountainview facility would be treated under SCE's proposed Power Purchase Agreement.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On September 5, 2003, Bruce Foster, Vice President, Regulatory Operations, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), participated in an all-party meeting with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present was Steven A. Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Gary Schoonyan, Director, SCE San Francisco office, and other attendees listed on the attachment to the notice. Foster indicated that it was imperative that the Commission make a decision on SCEs application by December 2003, and, in moving in that direction, issue the Scoping Memo in the very near future. Foster indicated that the Scoping Memo needs to establish a memorandum account and provide findings addressing the issues on the need for a Request for Proposal and the validity of the Power Purchase Agreement structure.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/CAGEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On September 5, 2003, Pearlie Sobino of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were Steve Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Scott Logan and Robert Cagen, for ORA, and other attendees. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cagen discussed the lack of cost-effectiveness or need analysis offered by applicants, and the inability of other parties to provide cost-effectiveness input because of a lack of information. Cagen further discussed the affiliate rulemaking decision and the KRCC decision prohibiting the application relief, and that the Edison holding company was not yet formed when the KRCC contract was executed. Cagen described the advantages of utility-owned generation and unaffiliated generation to Mountainview. Cagen also discussed the impracticality of the schedule Edison is seeking to impose on the Commission.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 2003
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
|
|
Description:
On September 5, 2003, Marc Joseph, attorney for the Coalition of California Utility Employees (CUE), met with Cmmr. Wood in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were Steve Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Robert Kinosian, advisor, Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Ross LaJeunesse, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, Gary Schoonyan, Bruce Foster and Mike Hoover, for Southern California Edison Company, Mark Fogelman and Christine Hammond, for the Navajo Nation, Don Brookhyser, for the Cogeneration Association of California/Energy Producers and Users Coalition, Andy Brown, for the Independent Energy Producers, Joe Karp, for the California Cogeneration Council, Robert Cagen, for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Sara Myers, for the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies, Jim Conran and Maryanne McCormick, for the California Small Business Association, Billy Blattner, for San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Matt Freedman, for The Utility Reform
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/CAGEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On September 5, 2003, Pearlie Sobino of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Also present was Scott Logan, for ORA. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Logan discussed the lack of cost-effectiveness or need analysis offered by applicants, and the inability of other parties to provide cost-effectiveness input because of a lack of information. Logan further discussed the affiliate rulemaking decision and the KRCC decision prohibiting the application relief. Logan described the advantages of utility-owned generation and unaffiliated generation to Mountainview. Sabino cited Qualified Facility contracts as examples of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission jurisdictional purchased power agreements that can be terminated pursuant to their contract provisions.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 5, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/CAGEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On September 3, 2003, Pearlie Sobino of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Michael Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, in San Francisco. Also present were Scott Logan and Robert Cagen, for ORA. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. ORA representatives discussed the size and location of the proposed project and the lack of a cost-effectiveness or need analysis offered by applicants, and the inability of other parties to provide cost-effectiveness input because of a lack of information. Cagen and Logan discussed the affiliate rulemaking decision and the KRCC decision prohibiting the application relief. Cagen discussed the advantages of utility-owned generation and unaffiliated generation to Mountain View. Cagen also noted the impracticality of the schedule Southern California Edison Company is seeking to impose on parties and the Commission.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 4, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to protests.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 3, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On August 28, 2003, Al Fohrer, Chief Executive Officer of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Cmmr. Kennedy at Hayes Street Grill in San Francisco. Also present were Ross LaJeunesse, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Robert Foster, President, and Bruce Foster, Vice President of Regulatory Operations, for SCE. SCE representatives explained that SCEs application on the Mountainview Power Project involved SCEs request for approval of a unit-contingent, gas-tolling power contract with a wholly owned subsidiary of SCE. SCE representatives stated that this opportunity, if approved, would result in the acquisition of additional generation capacity at a price below the estimated full construction cost of a comparable facility. SCE representatives stressed the importance of timely approval of SCEs application.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
SEQUOIA GENERATING COMPANY, LLC
|
|
Description:
in opposition to Motion of Independent Energy Producers Association.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
THE NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to [EDISON'S] Brief in support of the conclusion that a FERC-Approved PPA structure for Mountainview is in the public interest of ratepayers.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Motion of Independent Energy Producers Association to compel production of an unredacted copy of the Application, Testimony and Workpapers.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; regarding issues relating to public interest of Mountainview proposal.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On August 26, 2003, Robert Foster, President of Southern California Edison Company (SCE) met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and A Fohrer, Chief Executive Officer, and Bruce Foster, Vice President, Regulatory Operations, for SCE. SCE representatives urged the Commission to diligently process in a timely, but thoughtful and complete manner and explained that expedited review of SCEs application was necessary in order to secure the substantial benefits presented in the proposed transaction.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the feasibility and usefulness of a Mountainview RFP.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 5
|
Decision Number:
D0407038
|
Rendered Date:
July 8, 2004
Effective Date:
July 8, 2004
|
|
Description:
Modifies D04-03-037 and denies rehearing of the decision, as modified. (Comr. Lynch will file a dissent.)
|
Decision Number:
D0405050
|
Rendered Date:
May 27, 2004
Effective Date:
May 27, 2004
|
|
Description:
TURN is awarded $84,824.72 in intervenor compensation for its contribution to D03-12-059.
|
Decision Number:
D0404019
|
Rendered Date:
April 1, 2004
Effective Date:
April 1, 2004
|
|
Description:
Modifies D03-12-059 and denies applications for rehearing of decision, as modified. (Comr. Lynch dissents).
|
Decision Number:
D0403037
|
Rendered Date:
March 16, 2004
Effective Date:
March 16, 2004
|
|
Description:
Adopts Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's changes to the Mountainview Power purchase agreement approved by this Commission in D03-12-059. (Comr. Lynch reserves the right to file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0312059
|
Rendered Date:
December 18, 2003
Effective Date:
December 18, 2003
|
|
Description:
Grants SCE's application to acquire Mountainview Power Company, LLC (MVL) either as a wholly owned subsidiary and to enter into a power purchase agreement with MVL for electricity from the Mountainview power project, or as a utility-owned generation facility. This proceeding is closed. (Comr. Brown will file a concurrence. Comr. Wood reserves the right to file a concurrence. Comr. Lynch dissents).
|