|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
Ratesetting
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 117
(only the most current 100 are displayed)
Display all documents for this proceeding
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 25, 2008
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
|
|
Description:
ALJ's Ruling granting motions to file confidential material under seal.
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 2008
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(PUBLIC VERSION) Annual Report in Compliance with D.05-09-018.
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 2008
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Motion to File Under Seal Confidential Customer-Specific Economic Development Rate Information in the Annual Report in Compliance with D.05-09-018.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 2007
|
Filed By:
Aglet Consumer Alliance
|
|
Description:
Supplemental Request for Intervenor Compensation.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 2007
|
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network
|
|
Description:
For Compensation for Substantial Contribution to Decisions 06-04-002 and D.07-09-016.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 25, 2007
|
Filed By:
Aglet Consumer Alliance
|
|
Description:
For Award of Compensation.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 5, 2007
|
Filed By:
Guardian Industries Corp
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 30, 2007 Martin R. Bergman, Engineering Manager for Guardian Industries Corp (Guardian), Kingsburg met with Andrew Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Chong. Also present were Don A. Tullman, Ray Siada, and Martin R. Bergman of Guardian. Bergman stated that it was Guardian's understanding that the Proposed Decision (PD), as written, would have an impact on the Economic Development Rate contract Guardian has with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Kingsburg plant and reduce the discount. Bergman also stated that it was Guardian's understanding that the Alternate Proposed Decision (APD), as written, would not have an impact on the Economic Development Rate contract Guardian has with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Kingsburg plant. Guardian urged no changes be made to the original EDR decision. Contact Person: Martin Bergman, phone: (559) 896-6400, e-mail: mbergman@guardian.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 5, 2007
|
Filed By:
Guardian Industries Corp
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 30, 2007 Martin R. Bergman, Engineering Manager for Guardian Industries Corp (Guardian), Kingsburg met with Jaclyn Marks, advisor to Cmmr. Simon in San Francisco. Also present were Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Simon; and Don A. Tullman, Ray Siada, and Martin R. Bergman of Guardian. Bergman stated that it was Guardian's understanding that the Proposed Decision (PD), as written, would have an impact on the Economic Development Rate contract Guardian has with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Kingsburg plant and reduce the discount. Bergman also stated that it was Guardian's understanding that the Alternate Proposed Decision (APD), as written, would not have an impact on the Economic Development Rate contract Guardian has with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Kingsburg plant. Guardian urged no changes be made to the original EDR decision. Contact Person: Martin Bergman, phone: (559) 896-6400, e-mail: mbergman@guardian.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 5, 2007
|
Filed By:
Niagara Bottling, LLC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY. LATE FILED: On August 29, 2007 a conference call occurred between Brian Hess, Director of Operations for Niagara Bottling, LLC (Niagara), Theresa Cho, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, and Gregory Klatt of Douglass & Liddell. Hess summarized the information contained in Niagara's comments and reply comments on the proposed decisions concerning the company's good faith reliance on the Economic Development Rate (EDR) rate discounts approved in D.05-09-018 in deciding not to locate certain expansion production and relocate its existing production and other operations to outside California. Hess explained that should the Commission determine the EDR rate structure should be modified, Niagara supports adoption of the Alternate Proposed Decision because it provides that this determination should not affect existing EDR contracts. Contact Person: Michelle Dangott, telephone: (818) 961-3003, email: mdangott@energyattorney.com.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 5, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/RASHID/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On September 5, 2007 Andrew Ulmer, Chief Counsel of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) had a telephone conversation with Jaclyn Marks, advisor to Cmmr. Simon in San Francisco. Ulmer clarified that DRA would support the Alternate Proposed Decision of Pres. Peevey on condition that all future Economic Development Rate (EDR) contracts include within the floor price the nonbypassable Public Purpose Program surcharges and the marginal costs arising from providing service to the EDR customer. Contact Person: Sue Muniz, telephone: (415) 703-1858, email: sam@cpuc.ca.gov.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 5, 2007
|
Filed By:
Guardian Industries Corp
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 30, 2007 Martin R. Bergman, Engineering Manager for Guardian Industries Corp (Guardian), Kingsburg met with Theresa Cho, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich. Also present were Don A. Tullman, Ray Siada, and Martin R. Bergman of Guardian. Bergman stated that it was Guardian's understanding that the Proposed Decision (PD), as written, would have an impact on the Economic Development Rate contract Guardian has with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Kingsburg plant and reduce the discount. Bergman also stated that it was Guardian's understanding that the Alternate Proposed Decision (APD), as written, would not have an impact on the Economic Development Rate contract Guardian has with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Kingsburg plant. Guardian urged no changes be made to the original EDR decision. Contact Person: Martin Bergman, phone: (559) 896-6400, e-mail: mbergman@guardian.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/MORRIS/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 30, 2007 Andrew Ulmer, Chief Counsel of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) met with Theresa Cho, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich in San Francisco. Also present was Harvey Y. Morris, Assistant General Counsel for DRA. Ulmer stated that DRA supports the legal findings in both the Proposed Decision (PD) and Alternate Proposed Decision (AltPD), but discussed their concern that the AltPD would require ratepayers to shoulder 100% of the contribution to negative margin for EDR contracts negotiated after Decision 05-09-018, but prior to the Commission granting rehearing. DRA requested that the Commission clarify that EDR contracts in the future must include in the floor price the nonbypassable surcharges and the marginal costs. Contact Person: Sue Muniz, telephone: (415) 703-1858, email: sam@cpuc.ca.gov.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/MORRIS/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 29, 2007 Dana Appling, Director of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) met with Lindsay M. Brown, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn in San Francisco. Also present were Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn; Andrew Ulmer, Chief Counsel of DRA, and Harvey Y. Morris, Assistant General Counsel for DRA. Ulmer stated that DRA supports the legal findings in both the Proposed Decision (PD) and Alternate Proposed Decision (AltPD), but discussed their concern that the AltPD would require ratepayers to shoulder 100% of the contribution to negative margin for EDR contracts negotiated after Decision 05-09-018, but prior to the Commission granting rehearing. DRA requested that the Commission clarify that EDR contracts in the future must include in the floor price the nonbypassable surcharges and the marginal costs. Contact Person: Sue Muniz, telephone: (415) 703-1858, email: sam@cpuc.ca.gov.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/MORRIS/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 28, 2007 Dana Appling, Director of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) met with Jack Stoddard, advisor to Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Andrew Ulmer, Chief Counsel of DRA, and Harvey Y. Morris, Assistant General Counsel for DRA. Ulmer stated that DRA supports the legal findings in both the Proposed Decision (PD) and Alternate Proposed Decision (AltPD), but discussed their concern that the AltPD would require ratepayers to shoulder 100% of the contribution to negative margin for EDR contracts negotiated after Decision 05-09-018, but prior to the Commission granting rehearing. DRA requested that the Commission clarify that EDR contracts in the future must include in the floor price the nonbypassable surcharges and the marginal costs. Contact Person: Sue Muniz, telephone: (415) 703-1858, email: sam@cpuc.ca.gov.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/MORRIS/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 29, 2007 Dana Appling, Director of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) met with Andrew Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Chong in San Francisco. Also present were Andrew Ulmer, Chief Counsel of DRA, and Harvey Y. Morris, Assistant General Counsel for DRA. Ulmer stated that DRA supports the legal findings in both the Proposed Decision (PD) and Alternate Proposed Decision (AltPD), but discussed their concern that the AltPD would require ratepayers to shoulder 100% of the contribution to negative margin for EDR contracts negotiated after Decision 05-09-018, but prior to the Commission granting rehearing. DRA requested that the Commission clarify that EDR contracts in the future must include in the floor price the nonbypassable surcharges and the marginal costs. Contact Person: Sue Muniz, telephone: (415) 703-1858, email: sam@cpuc.ca.gov.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/MORRIS/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 27, 2007 Dana Appling, Director for the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) met with Robert Mason, advisor to Cmmr. Simon in San Francisco. Also present were Jaclyn Marks, advisor to Cmmr. Simon; and Andrew Ulmer, Chief Counsel of DRA. Ulmer stated that DRA supports the legal findings in both the Proposed Decision (PD) and Alternate Proposed Decision (AltPD) and discussed their concern that would require ratepayers to shoulder 100% of the contribution to negative margin for EDR contracts negotiated after the effective date of a decision in this matter. Contact Person: Sue Muniz, telephone: (415) 703-1858, email: sam@cpuc.ca.gov.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 2007
|
Filed By:
Guardian Industries Corp
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 23, 2007 Don A. Tullman, West Coast Regional Manager for Guardian Industries Corp met with Jack Stoddard, advisor to Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Lindsay M. Brown, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn; Ray Siada, Corporate Energy Manager for Guardian Industries Corp, and Martin R. Bergman, Engineering Manager for Guardian Industries Corp, Kingsburg. Tullman stated that the Proposed Decision (PD), as written, would have an impact on the Economic Development Rate contract Guardian Industries Corp has with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Kingsburg plant. Tullman also stated that the Alternate Proposed Decision, as written, would not have an impact on the Economic Development Rate contract Guardian Industries Corp has with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Kingsburg plant. Contact Person: Martin Bergman, telephone: (559) 896-6400, email: mbergman@guardian.com.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 27, 2007
|
Filed By:
Niagara Bottling, LLC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 22, 2007 Brian Hess, Director of Operations for Niagara Bottling, LLC (Niagara) met with Andrew Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Chong in San Francisco. Also present were Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Simon; and Gregory Klatt of Douglas & Liddell. Hess summarized the information contained in Niagara's comments and reply comments on the proposed decisions concerning the company's good faith reliance on the Economic Development Rate (EDR) rate discounts approved in D.05-09-018 in deciding not to locate certain expansion production and relocate its existing production and other operations to outside California. Hess also explained that should the Commission determine the EDR rate structure should be modified, Niagara supports adoption of the Alternate Proposed Decision. Contact Person: Michelle Dangott, telephone: (818) 961-3003, email: mdangott@energyattorney.com.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 27, 2007
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On August 22, 2007, John Clarke, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) met with Jack Stoddard, advisor to Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Dennis Keane and Stan Kataoka, Managers, Service Analysis, PG&E. Clarke stated that the Draft Decision and Alternate Draft Decision erroneously conclude that the floor price for discounting Economic Development Rates (EDR) should be the sum of the existing marginal cost floor and non-bypassable charges. Keane reviewed the illustrative example provided in PG&E's reply comments on the PD and APD in relation to the EDR program. Kataoka discussed the Commission's regulatory policy on the EDR program.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/RASHID/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 23, 2007, Dana Appling, Director for the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) met with Jack Stoddard, advisor to Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Appling informed Stoddard that Guardian Industries may have been misinformed about the effect of the Proposed Decision of ALJ Barnett and Alternate Proposed Decision of Pres. Peevey. Appling told Stoddard that it was her understanding the Guardian Industries would receive their discounts regardless of any of the decisions. Contact Person: Sue Muniz, telephone: (415) 703-1858, email: sam@cpuc.ca.gov.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 2007
|
Filed By:
Southern California Gas Company
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 22, 2007 Lad Lorenz, V.P. Regulatory Relations for Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) and San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E) met with Nancy Ryan, advisor to Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present was Jack Stoddard, advisor to Pres. Peevey. Lorenz discussed possible changes to the Proposed Decision (PD) regarding public purpose program (PPP) customer class discounts; removing language appearing to endorse equal cents per therm PPP allocation; and clarifying the applicability of PPP surcharges to all California natural gas utilities. Contact Person: Trish Rickard, telephone: (415) 202-9986, email: Trickard@semprautilities.com.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 2007
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: On August 17, 2007 Stan Kataoka, Manager, Service Analyst for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) had a telephone conversation with Jack Stoddard, advisor to Pres. Peevey. Kataoka explained that if the Proposed Decision (PD) adding new elements to the Economic Development Rate (EDR) price floor were approved as-is, at least some of the customers currently served under EDR's would see their incentives reduced. Kataoka also stated that there might be new limits on PG&E's ability to provide any meaningful level of incentive to applicants for the EDR.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 2007
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Proposed and Alternate Decisions on Rehearing of Decision 05-09-018 regarding the floor price for EDR.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 2007
|
Filed By:
Merced Irrigation District
Modesto Irrigation District
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Proposed Decision of ALJ Barnett and Alternate Proposed Decision of President Peevey Rejecting Discounting Public Purpose Program Charges.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 2007
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; To Comments on Proposed Decision of Administrative Law Judge Barnett and Alternate Proposed Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 2007
|
Filed By:
Niagara Bottling, LLC
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Barnett and on the Alternate Proposed Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 2007
|
Filed By:
Aglet Consumer Alliance
DRA/RASHID/CPUC
Disability Rights Advocates
Environmental Center of San Luis Obispo
Latino Issues Forum
The Utility Reform Network
|
|
Description:
Joint Reply; on the Alternate Proposed Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
Niagara Bottling, LLC
|
|
Description:
On the Proposed Decision of ALJ Barnett and the Alternate Proposed Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
On Proposed Decision of Administrative Law Judge Barnett and Alternate Proposed Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
On Proposed and Alternate Decisions on Rehearing of Decision 05-09-018 Regarding the Floor Price For EDR.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
Southern California Gas Company
|
|
Description:
Concerning Proposed Decision and Alternate Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
Aglet
DRA/RHD/CPUC
Disability Rights Advocates
Environmetal Center of San Luis Obispo
Latino Issues Forum
The Utility Reform Network
|
|
Description:
Joint Opening; On the Alternate Proposed Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 2007
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Decision Rejecting Discounting Public Purpose Programs. Opening comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due no later than August 13, 2007. Reply comments are due five days after opening comments are filed.
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 2007
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Proposed Decision of President Peevey Rejecting Discounting Public Purpose Programs. Opening comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due no later than August 13, 2007. Reply comments are due five days after opening comments are filed.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 27, 2007
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
|
|
Description:
granting Southern California Edison Company's motion for leave to file confidential materials under seal, namely customer-specific economic development rate information.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 2007
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
|
|
Description:
regarding motion of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for leave to file confidential material(s) under seal, namely Appendix I and II to its 2006 Report on Economic Development Rate applications.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2007
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
2006 Report on Economic Development Rate Applicants [Redacted Version] in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 2 of Decision 05-09-018.
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2007
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Motion to File Confidential Information Under Seal, namely, Appendix I and II to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's 2006 Report on Economic Development Rate Applicants.
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2007
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Motion to File Confidential Information Under Seal, namely, Customer-Specific Economic Development Rate Information.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2007
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(PUBLIC VERSION) Report in compliance with Decision 05-09-018.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 23, 2006
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On October 20, 2006, Marzia Zafar, CPUC Relations Manager for Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco, outside the Commission offices. Zafar urged the Commission to adopt SoCalGas¿ proposal to create a separate customer class which would consist of a lower public purpose program surcharge. Zafar explained that creating a separate customer class does not run afoul of Section 890, but rather is clearly within the Commission¿s discretion under that statutory provision.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/Rashid/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On October 18, 2006, Dana Appling, Director of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Harvey Y. Morris, Assistant General Counsel, Regina DeAngelis and Rashid Rashid, attorneys for DRA, Nina Suetake, attorney for The Utilities Reform Network, Enrique Gallardo, attorney for Latino Issues Forum, and Alexis Wodtke, attorney for the Consumer Federation of California. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. The parties expressed their concern over discounting the PPP surcharge and stated that the Commission does not have legal authority to discount the Public Purpose Program (PPP) Surcharge. The parties warned that if the Commission discounts or creates a separate discounted class for companies that threaten to leave the state, it would set precedent to provide discounts to other consumers that threaten to leave the state, which would lead to substantial decreases in PPP funding.
Contact per
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/Rashid/CPUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On October 12, 2006, Dana Appling, Director of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Harvey Y. Morris, Assistant General Counsel, Regina DeAngelis and Rashid A. Rashid, attorneys for DRA, and Nina Suetake, attorney for The Utility Reform Network (TURN). Copies of TURN and DRA's comments were used. DRA and TURN explained that the Commission does not have legal authority to discount the Public Purpose Program (PPP) Surcharge. DRA and TURN warned that if the Commission discounts Guardian's PPP surcharge based on its threat to leave the state, it would set precedent for the Commission to provide discounts to other industrial gas consumers that threaten to leave the state, which would lead to substantial decreases in PPP funding.
Contact person: Sue Muniz, telephone (415) 703-1858; email: sam@cpuc.ca.gov
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 2006
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; in Response to the June 22, 2006 and June 26, 2006 ALJ Rulings. (Late-filing authorized by ALJ Barnett).
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
Merced Irrigation District
Modesto Irrigation District
|
|
Description:
Reply; in Response to Ruling of ALJ Barnett regarding Order Granting Limited Rehearing of Decision 05-09-018 regarding the Floor Price for EDR.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Gas Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; concening Discounting of the Gas Public Purpose Program Surcharge.
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
Amendment to August 1, 2006 Comments in Response to ALJ's Ruling.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
|
|
Description:
Reply; in Response to Ruling of ALJ Barnett regarding Order Granting Limited Rehearing of Decision 05-09-018 regarding the Floor Price for EDR
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
CALIFORNIA CITIZENS FOR HEALTH FREEDOM
CONSUMER FEDERATION OF CALIFORNIA
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
DRA/DEANGELIS/PUC
ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
UTILITY CONSUMERS ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Joint, Reply; in Response to ALJ Rulings regarding Discounting Nonpassable Surcharges.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; in Response to ALJ Ruling regarding Order Granting Limited Rehearing of Decision 05-09-018 regarding the Floor Price for EDR.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Granting the Motion by DRA and TURN to File as Confidential Attachment 1 of the Joint Initial Comments.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
Merced Irrigation District
Modesto Irrigation District
|
|
Description:
in Response to Ruling of ALJ Robert Barnett regarding Order Granting Limited Rehearing of Decision 05-09-018 regarding the Floor Price for EDR.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
in Response to Ruling of ALJ regarding Order Granting Limited Rehearing of Decision 05-09-018 regarding the Floor Price for EDR
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/DEANGELIS/RASHID/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Motion to file as confidential Attachment 1 of the Joint Initial Comments (Attachment 1 of Joint Initial Comments Attached Hereto [under seal]).
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
CALIFORNIA CITIZENS FOR HEALTH FREEDOM
CONSUMER FEDERATION OF CALIFORNIA
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
DRA/DEANGELIS/RASHID/PUC
ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GREENLINING INSTITUTE
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
UTILITY CONSUMER ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
joint; initial; in response to the ALJ's ruling regarding discounting nonbypassable surcharges.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
in response to the June 22, 2006 Ruling regarding order granting limited rehearing of D05-09-018 regarding the floor price for EDR.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
concerning Discounting of the Gas Public Purpose Program Surcharge.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
opening; on the ALJ's ruling [of June 26, 2006] requesting comments.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 25, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/VIETH/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Consolidating Discount Issues for Decision and Establishing New Service List for Filing Reply Comment and Other documents concerning Discount Issues. Comments due on 08/01/06 and Reply Comments due on 08/22/06 shall be filed in these Consolidated dockets.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 11, 2006
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
to Joint Application for Rehearing.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
joint; of D06-05-042.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
|
|
Description:
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING REGARDING ORDER GRANTING LIMITED REHEARING OF DECISION (D.) 05-09-018 REGARDING THE FLOOR PRICE FOR EDR. Opening comments and proposals are due on or before 8/1/06. Reply comments and proposals are due on or before 8/22/06.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Application of Aglet for Rehearing of D05-09-018.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Application for Rehearing of D05-09-018.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
of D05-09-018.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply comments on Alternate Proposed Decision of Cmmr. Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
|
|
Description:
reply comments on Alternate Opinion of Cmmr. Brown concerning economic development rate tariffs.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Alternate Proposed Decision of Cmmr. Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
on Alternate of Cmmr. Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/DEANGELIS/PUC
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Brown.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; Proposed Decision of Cmmr Brown.
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 2005
|
Filed By:
CMMR/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Alternate opinion concerning economic development rate tariffs. Comments are due September 1, 2005; reply comments - September 6, 2005.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
|
|
Description:
On August 19, 2005, Dan L. Carroll, attorney for the Merced Irrigation District and Modesto Irrigation District, had a telephone conversation with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy. Carroll urged the Commission to revise the Cmmr. Kennedy's alternate decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
|
|
Description:
Reply; to Opening Comments on Proposed and Alternate Decisions.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on Proposed Decision and Alternate Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Alternate Proposed Decision of Cmmr Kennedy.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
reply; on Proposed Decision of ALJ Barnett.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
|
|
Description:
On August 17, 2005, Dan L. Carroll, attorney for the Merced Irrigation District and Modesto Irrigation District, had two separate telephone conversations: with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Carroll stated that the Districts do not oppose economic development rate programs as long as they are fair and competitively neutral. Carroll noted that the proposed alternate decision (AD) of Cmmr. Kennedy with respect to economic development rates is vague in terms of the proposals to be adopted by the Commission. Carroll specified that most parties agree that the Commission should adopt the Joint Utility Proposal and revisions to the AD are necessary to reflect that. Carroll also explained that a number of issues were litigated in the proceeding which are not addressed in the AD, but should be.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Barnett and Alternate Proposed Decision of Cmmr. Kennedy.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Kennedy.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
|
|
Description:
Opinion of Cmmr Kennedy.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Barnett.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision & Alternate Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Proposed Decision of Cmmr Kennedy.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Proposed Decision of Cmmr Kennedy.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
July 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion Rejecting Economic Development Rate Tariffs. Comments are due August 15, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
CMMR/KENNEDY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion Accepting Economic Development Rate Trariffs. Comments are due August 15, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/DEANGELIS/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 2004
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM
|
|
Description:
Opening; with regard to Economic Development Rates.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/DEANGELIS/PUC
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 8
|
Decision Number:
D0805016
|
Rendered Date:
May 15, 2008
Effective Date:
May 15, 2008
|
|
Description:
Awards Aglet Consumer Alliance $42,463.05 for its substantial contributions to Decision (D.) 05-09-018, D.06-05-042, D.06-08-033, and D.07-09-016. Closes these three proceedings.
|
Decision Number:
D0804012
|
Rendered Date:
April 10, 2008
Effective Date:
April 10, 2008
|
|
Description:
Grants intervenor compensation to The Utility Reform Network for substantial contribution to Decision (D.) 06-04-002 and D.07-09-016. These proceedings are closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0711052
|
Rendered Date:
November 20, 2007
Effective Date:
November 20, 2007
|
|
Description:
Corrects error in Decision 07-09-016.
|
Decision Number:
D0709016
|
Rendered Date:
September 6, 2007
Effective Date:
September 6, 2007
|
|
Description:
Rejects discounting public purpose programs. A04-04-008, A04-06-018, and A05-10-010 are closed. (Commissioner Bohn reserves the right to file a concurrence.)
|
Decision Number:
D0608033
|
Rendered Date:
August 24, 2006
Effective Date:
August 24, 2006
|
|
Description:
Dismisses application for rehearing of D06-05-042.
|
Decision Number:
D0606006
|
Rendered Date:
June 9, 2006
Effective Date:
June 9, 2006
|
|
Description:
Corrects error in D06-05-042.
|
Decision Number:
D0605042
|
Rendered Date:
May 25, 2006
Effective Date:
May 25, 2006
|
|
Description:
Grants limited rehearing of Decision 05-09-018 regarding the floor price, modifies the decision, and denies rehearing as modified, in all other aspects.
|
Decision Number:
D0509018
|
Rendered Date:
September 8, 2005
Effective Date:
September 8, 2005
|
|
Description:
Accepts economic development rate tariffs. These proceedings are closed.
|