|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Preliminary Category:
Commission Designated Category:
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 51
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES , INC.
|
|
Description:
On September 7, 2005, Rex Knowles, Regional Vice President Regulatory for XO Communications Services, Inc. (XO), met with Aram Shumavon, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Kelly Hymes, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, and Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in five separate meetings in San Francisco. Also present was Jane Whang, outside counsel for XO. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Knowles and Whang discussed issues related to the Final Arbitrator's Report. Knowles discussed the importance of having an expeditious Commission decision approving a conforming amendment in this proceeding. Knowles also explained that the FAR (and the conforming amendment) should be revised in two important aspects.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
ARRIVAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CF COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
CURATEL, LLC
DMR COMMUNICATIONS
MCI, INC.
MPOWER COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
NAVIGATOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC
NETLOJIX TELECOM, INC.
PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC.
TCAST COMMUNICATIONS
TELSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
TRI-M COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
of Joint CLECs on Conformed Agreement.
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Statement Regarding Conforming Interconnection Agreement Amendment.
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
|
|
Description:
on Compliance of Amendment with Federal and State Law.
|
Type:
ARBITRATOR REPORT
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DUDA/PUC
|
|
Description:
final. Parties shall file an amendment to their existing Interconnection Agreement, for Commission approval, by August 22, 2005.
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
|
|
Description:
to the response brief on TRRO issues and comments on draft arbitrator's report on TRO issues.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Joint Submission on TRRO Remand Order Issues [of joint matrix and draft interconnection agreement amendment].
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
|
|
Description:
On June 15, 2005, Rex Knowles, Regional Vice President Regulatory for XO Communications Services, Inc. (XO), met with Aram Shumavon, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Doug Kinkoph, Vice President Regulatory and External Affairs, and Jane Whang, outside counsel, for XO. Knowles explained that there were three aspects of the Draft Arbitrator's Report that would permit discriminatory and anti-competitive conduct by SBC and were particularly troubling for XO.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
June 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; to opening brief of XO.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
June 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
|
|
Description:
response; on TRRO issues and comments on draft arbitrator's report on TRO issues.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
June 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
|
|
Description:
opening; on TRRO issues and comments on Draft Arbitrator's Report on TRO issues.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Arbitrator's Report and Openting Brief on TRO Remand Order issues.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Supplement Joint Submission of TRO Remand Order Issues [filed on May 17, 2005.]
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
XO CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
Joint Submission of TRO Remand Order Issues.
|
Type:
ARBITRATOR REPORT
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DUDA/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRAFT. Comments are due on June 1, 2005; and reply comments - on June 15, 2005.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DUDA/PUC
|
|
Description:
Revises the schedule and sets a prehearing conference. May 11, 2005 - parties to file a matrix of new disputed issues; May 16, 2005 - prehearing conference; June 1 - opening briefs on TRRO issues; June 15 - reply briefs; 7/22/5 - draft arbitrator's report (DAR); 8/1/5 - comments on DAR, 9/9/5 - final Arbitrator's Report; 9/16 - parties file conforming agreement; 9/26 - comments on agreement; 10/6 or 10/27 - commission action.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
|
|
Description:
on the draft opinion modifying and confirming the assigned commissioner's and arbitrator's ruling requiring SBC to maintian the status quo.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Revisions to submitted contract language submitted on behalf of the parties.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DUDA/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments are due 4/4/05.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 16, 2005, Eric Batongbacal, Executive Director-Regulatory Matters of Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba SBC California (SBC CA), met with Aram Shumavon, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Gwen Johnson, Consultant-Service Quality, and Ed Kolto, General Attorney State Regulatory, for SBC CA. SBC CA representatives discussed Cmmr. Brown and ALJ Duda's ruling in the SBC/XO arbitration, issued March 10, 2005, Cmmr. Kennedy's ruling in the TRO proceeding, issued March 11, 2005, and Cmmr. Peevey's ruling in the Verizon/CLEC arbitration application. SBC CA representatives expressed SBC CA's belief that the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review Remand Order permits ILECs to cease processing new UNE-P orders for both new and existing customers, as of March 11, 2005.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DUDA/PUC
CMMR/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants XO's March 3, 2005 motion as set forth.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to XO's motion for an expedited order requiring SBC to maintain status quo etc.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
for an expedited order requiring SBC to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of this arbitration.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
for order shortening time for SBC response to motion for an expedited order requiring SBC to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of this arbitration.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Supplemental.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
January 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
January 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
initial.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
initial.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
for official notice of a state commission decision on the XO-SBC arbitration.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
pursuant to ALJ Ruling of September 9, 2004.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to XO's request for official notice.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to take official notice of a state decision dismissing the XO-SBC arbitration.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to XO's request for official notice of a State Arbitration Panel Decision.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 19, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
for official notice of a State Arbitration Panel decision on the XO-SBC arbitration.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 12, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to SBC's response to XO's motion to withdraw petition, etc.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to XO's motion to withdraw petition, etc.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 28, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
for expedited order holding proceedings in abeyance pending resolution of Motion to Terminate Proceedings.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 28, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to withdraw petition and terminate arbitration proceedings.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DUDA/PUC
|
|
Description:
Denies a June 7, 2004 motion of XO California to dismiss arbitration issues, as set forth.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to XO's motion to dismiss arbitration issues and strike related contract language proposed by SBC.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to additional issues raised by SBC response.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 8, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DUDA/PUC
|
|
Description:
Denies XO California's motion to dismiss filed May 3, 2004.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO COMMUNICATIONS INC.
|
|
Description:
to dismiss arbitration issues and strike related contract language proposed by SBC.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 28, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Petition for Arbitration and Request for Waiver.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to response to motion to dismiss petition for arbitration and request for waiver or variance of Commission's Rules.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
May 24, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to SBC motion to dismiss.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to dismiss petition for arbitration.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to shorten time to responde to motion to dismiss.
|
Type:
APPLICATION
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
for arbitration of an amendment to an interconnection agreement with SBC California, pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 2
|
Decision Number:
D0509042
|
Rendered Date:
September 22, 2005
Effective Date:
September 22, 2005
|
|
Description:
Approves arbitrated interconnection agreement. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0504027
|
Rendered Date:
April 7, 2005
Effective Date:
April 7, 2005
|
|
Description:
Modifies and confirms the Assigned Commissioner's and Arbitrator's Ruling requiring SBC California to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of this arbitration.
|