|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
Ratesetting
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 39 G)
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 76
|
Type:
AMENDMENT
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to Request for Compensation for Substantial Contribution to D05-06-029.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
August 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for compensation for substantial contribution to D05-06-029.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Application for Rehearing of D05-06-029 by the Indicated Producers and CMTA.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to Applications for Rehearing of Decision 05-06-029.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Applications for Rehearing of Decision 05-06-029.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
|
|
Description:
On July 20, 2005, Grant Kolling, Senior Assistant City Attorney for the City of Palo Alto (City), met with Nilgun Atamturk, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, in San Francisco. Also present were Chris Hilen, outside counsel, for the City, and Gordon Pickering, Associate Director of Navigant Consulting. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. The City requested that D05-06-029 be modified to exempt Palo Alto from the cost allocation for Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP). The City representatives explained that Palo Alto is a municipal utility that provides both gas and electric service to its retail customers. The City representatives stated that the decision reverses long-standing Commission policy with respect to wholesale customers and has no support in the evidentiary record of the case, because all of the parties that addressed that issue testified that wholesale customers should be exempt from the SGIP cost allocation.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
|
|
Description:
of D05-06-029.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
INDICATED PRODUCERS
|
|
Description:
of D05-06-029.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
|
|
Description:
On July 12, 2005, Grant Kolling, Senior Assistant City Attorney for the City of Palo Alto (City), met with Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present were Chris Hilen, outside counsel, for the City, and Gordon Pickering, Associate Director of Navigant Consulting. The City requested that D05-06-029 be modified to exempt Palo Alto from the cost allocation for Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP). The City representatives explained that Palo Alto is a municipal utility that provides both gas and electric service to its retail customers. The City representatives stated that the decision reverses long-standing Commission policy with respect to wholesale customers and has no support in the evidentiary record of the case, because all of the parties that addressed that issue testified that wholesale customers should be exempt from the SGIP cost allocation.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
|
|
Description:
On July 5, 2005, Grant Kolling, Senior Assistant City Attorney for the City of Palo Alto (City), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Raveen Maan, Resource Planner, and Chris Hilen, outside counsel, for the City, and Gordon Pickering, Associate Director of Navigant Consulting. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. The City requested that D05-06-029 be modified to exempt Palo Alto from the cost allocation for Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP). The City representatives explained that Palo Alto is a municipal utility that provides both gas and electric service to its retail customers. The City representatives stated that the decision reverses long-standing Commission policy with respect to wholesale customers and has no support in the evidentiary record of the case, because all of the parties that addressed that issue testified that wholesale customers should be exempt fr
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
INDICATED PRODUCERS
|
|
Description:
On June 15, 2005, Evelyn Kahl, counsel to the Indicated Producers (IP), sent written material (attached to the notice) by e-mail to Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn. The material details different methods of allocating CARE costs.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 10, 2005, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Amy Yip-Kikugawa, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. Eisenman requested that if the final order is held at the Commission's June 16, 2005 business meeting, that language be added stating that the balancing account for non-core distribution costs be made effective July 1, 2005. During the meeting with Yip-Kikugawa, Eisenman also explained that the final order in this proceeding should permit PG&E to recover Self-Generation Incentive Program costs, and permit prospective recovery in the annual true-up advice filing. Eisenman argued that maintaining the current allocation of CARE costs is unfair to industrial customers and requested that the Commission consider alternatives to the current allocation.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA
|
|
Description:
On June 9, 2005, Brian Cragg, representing Duke Energy North America, (Duke), spoke by telephone with Larry Chaset, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich. Cragg encouraged the Commission to adopt an allocation of costs for the Self-Generation Incentive Program based on the allocation of cost for energy efficiency programs.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 9, 2005, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), had a telephone conversation with Larry Chaset, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich. Eisenman requested that if the Commission places a hold on the final decision in PG&E's BCAP at the Commission's June 16, 2005 business meeting in order to issue an alternate decision, that the alternate include language setting July 1, 2005, as the date that the balancing account for non-core distribution costs should be established and in effect. Eisenman added that the order should give PG&E the authority to recover Self-Generation Incentive Program costs.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
On June 9, 2005, Joseph M. Karp from White & Case, LLP, counsel for the California Cogeneration Council (CCC), spoke on the telephone with Laurence Chaset, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich. A copy of the comments (attached to the notice) to the proposed decision (PD) was sent to Laurence Chaset following the telephone conversation. Karp explained that portions of the ALJ's PD on the SGIP and replacement cost adder issues should be changed.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
INDICATED PRODUCERS
|
|
Description:
On June 9, 2005, Evelyn Kahl, counsel to the Indicated Producers, met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present was Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Kennedy. Kahl discussed the Draft Decision's (DD) treatment of CARE cost allocation and observed that the record on CARE charges and impact is complete and there is no reason to defer resolution of the issue to a later proceeding as proposed by the DD. Kahl stated that the Commission should take the time necessary to develop an alternate decision resolving this issue. Kahl noted that CARE charges have increased 1022 percent since 2001; this increase requires reconsideration of the existing allocation methodology. Kahl also noted that an allocator based on usage is not appropriate for CARE surcharges and that an equal percentage of transportation revenues (EPTR) methodology would be a more appropriate way to allocate these costs. Kahl urged that at a minimum, the costs should be
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
On June 7, 2005, Avis Clark of Calpine Corporation, representing the California Cogeneration Council (CCC), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Also present were R. Thomas Beach, the CCC's expert witness, and Joseph M. Karp from White & Case, LLP, the CCC's counsel. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. The CCC's representatives stated that self-generation incentive program gas costs should not be allocated to electricity generators on an equal cents per therm basis and instead should be allocated on the same basis as energy efficiency program costs. CCC's representatives commented that the Commission should reject the proposed decision's (PD) continued use of the replacement cost adder and of the `new customer only' method for calculating marginal customer costs.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 27, 2005, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), had a telephone conversation with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Eisenman stated that the Office of Ratepayer Advocates had reviewed PG&E's Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) costs and concluded that no adjustment is necessary for the recorded SGIP memorandum account. Eisenman stated that continuing to allocate CARE costs on an equal cents per therm basis is inequitable to industrial customers. Eisenman suggested that the Commission consider the California Manufacturers & Technology Association and Indicated Producers' Ex Parte proposal to allocate fifty percent of CARE costs on an equal cents per therm basis and fifty percent on an equal percent of transportation costs basis. Eisenman also noted that Conclusion of Law 2 in the revised proposed decision needed to be changed.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 27, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On May 24, 2005, Keith McCrea, counsel to the California Manufacturers & Technology Association, had two separate telephone conversations with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Laurence Chaset, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich. McCrea discussed the draft decision's (DD) treatment of CARE cost allocation. McCrea explained that there is no reason to defer resolution of the issue to a later proceeding as proposed in the DD. McCrea noted that allocating CARE costs using equal cents per therm (ECPT) is not appropriate since CARE costs are not directly related to usage. McCrea asserted that an equal percentage of transportation revenues (EPTR) methodology, therefore, would be a more appropriate way to allocate these costs. McCrea suggested that if the Commission were looking for a compromise approach, one such method would be to allocate the costs fifty percent on an ECPT basis and 50 percent using EPTR.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
INDICATED PRODUCERS
|
|
Description:
On May 24, 2005, Keith McCrea, counsel to the California Manufacturers & Technology Association, met with Rami Kahlon, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Evelyn Kahl, counsel to the Indicated Producers. McCrea and Kahl discussed the Draft Decision's (DD) treatment of CARE cost allocation. McCrea and Kahl explained that here is no reason to defer resolution of the issue to a later proceeding as proposed in the DD. McCrea noted that ECPT, an allocator based on usage, is not appropriate for CARE surcharges and that an equal percentage of transportation revenues (EPTR) methodology, therefore, would be a more appropriate way to allocate those costs. McCrea and Kahl urged that at a minimum, the costs should be allocated using 50% ECPT and 50% EPTR.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 25, 2005
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On May 18, 2005, Marcel Hawiger, staff attorney with The Utility Reform Network (TURN), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Laurence Chaset, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Hawiger stated that the Commission should modify the proposed decision to resolve the CARE allocation issue both to conserve judicial resources, and because TURN's alternate recommendation linked CARE and SGIP allocation.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 25, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 18, 2005, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. Eisenman requested that the proposed decision be corrected to allow PG&E to recover about $15 million in Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) costs. Eisenman added that PG&E should be permitted to request recovery of prospective SGIP costs in its annual gas true-up advice letter filing, rather than having to defer recovery until its next Biennial Cost Accounting Proceeding filing.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
|
|
Description:
reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GENERATION COALITION
|
|
Description:
to Opening Comments on the proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 18, 2005, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Gas and Electric Company, met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present was Ron Helgens, Manager, Operations Revenue Requirements, PG&E. Helgens explained that PG&E's position is that the real economic carrying cost (RECC) calculation accounts for the replacement of distribution investment facilities and that a replacement cost adder is not required in the determination of marginal distribution costs. Helgens added that RECC is a factor which when multiplied by the forecasted marginal distribution investment expenditures results in an annual revenue stream that would finance not only a distribution investment but also its eventual replacement. Helgens referred to TURN's position and argued that current replacements are not avoidable given PG&E's obligation to serve, and therefore, since they are not avoidable, they should not be regarded as marginal costs.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
On May 19, 2005, Avis Clark of Calpine Corporation, representing the California Cogeneration Council (CCC), met with Larry Chaset, interim advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, in San Francisco. Also present were R. Thomas Beach, expert witness, and Joseph M. Karp from White & Case, LLP, counsel, for CCC. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. CCC's representatives urged the Commission to make certain changes to the proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON MAY 18, 2005, AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF MAY 20, 2005. On May 13, 2005, Avis Clark of Calpine Corporation, representing the California Cogeneration Council (CCC), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Rami Kahlon, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. At the meeting with Belinda Gatti also present was Eugene Cadenasso of the Energy Division. R. Thomas Beach, CCC's expert witness, and Joseph M. Karp from White & Case, LLP, CCC's counsel, attended the meetings. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. CCC's representatives urged the Commission to make certain changes to the proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On May 13, 2005, Avis Clark of Calpine Corporation, representing the California Cogeneration Council (CCC), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Rami Kahlon, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in two separate meetings. At the meeting with Belinda Gatti also present was Eugene Cadenasso of the Energy Division. R. Thomas Beach, CCC's expert witness, and Joseph M. Karp from White & Case, LLP, CCC's counsel, attended the meetings. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. CCC's representatives urged the Commission to make certain changes to the proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 12, 2005, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Gas and Electric Company, met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present was Eugene Cadenasso of the Energy Division. Eisenman requested that the Commission make some changes to the proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
CITY OF PALO ALTO
|
|
Description:
on the April 26, 2005 proposed decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
WEST COAST GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
joint; on the proposed decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
DUKE ENERGY MARKETING AMERICA, LLC
DUKE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA, LLC
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GENERATION COALITION
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
INDICATED PRODUCERS
|
|
Description:
on the draft interim order.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
WESTERN MANUFACTURED HOUSING COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Malcolm.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
WEST COAST GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 12, 2005, Raymond Czahar, representative of West Coast Gas Company (WCG), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Eugene Cadenasso of the Energy Division and James Squeri, counsel for WCG. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. WCG discussed the reasons why the draft decision¿s treatment of the proposed settlement between Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and WCG should be rejected and why the Commission should instead adopt the PG&E-WCG settlement as proposed and unopposed.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On April 18, 2005, PPG Industries, Inc., a member of the California Manufacturers & Technology Association, sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Brown. Copies of the letter were also sent to Cmmrs. Peevey, Kennedy and Grueneich. The letter expressed support for the Pacific Gas and Electric Company proposed method for allocating CARE costs.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MALCOLM/PUC
|
|
Description:
Interim Order. Comments are due May 16, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 19, 2005, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present was Sandy Lawrie, Team Leader, Energy Revenue Requirements, for PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Eisenman requested that the Commission adopt PG&E¿s proposal to allocate CARE costs based on the percentage of the gas transportation revenue requirement collected from ach customer class. Lawrie requested that the Commission adopt PG&E's proposal to allocate the Self-Generation Incentive Program costs on an equal cents per therm basis to all retail gas customers. Lawrie also requested that the Commission approve PG&E's proposals on the marginal costs of providing gas distribution service. Eisenman urged the Commission to approve the Stipulation and Settlements filed in this proceeding.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
INDICATED PRODUCERS
|
|
Description:
reply on CARE issues.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GENERATION COALITION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
joint, reply; on marginal cost and self generation incentive program issues.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
SCHOOL PROJECT FOR UTILITY RATE REDUCTION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 2005
|
Filed By:
CLEAN ENERGY
|
|
Description:
in lieu of Brief in support of Settlement Agreement.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
WESTERN MANUFACTURED HOUSING COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
opening; supporting master meter settlement.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
INDICATED PRODUCERS
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GENERATION COALITION
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION OCUNCIL
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
joint, opening; on marginal cost and self generation incentive program issues.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
CLEAN ENERGY
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for adoption of a settlement agreement resolving natural gas vehicle fueling rate issues; and waiver of the comment period to coincide with the briefing schedule.
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
Submitted; Volume 6.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MATTSON/MALCOLM/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants the December 29, 2004 motion of WMA to consider gas master meter discount issues in A04-07-044; and modifies scoping memo in A04-07-044. Sets evidentiary hearing, if needed, for March 8, 2005, in A04-07-044.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MALCOLM/PUC
|
|
Description:
Finds that TURN has met the eligibility requirements of Section 1804(a) and has satisfied the requirements for an NOI to claim compensation in this proceeding.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 17, 2004
|
Filed By:
CLEAN ENERGY
|
|
Description:
to Intervene.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2004
|
Filed By:
SCHOOL PROJECT FOR UTILITY RATE REDUCTION
|
|
Description:
to Intervene as an Interested Party.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of intent to claim compensation.
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MALCOLM/PUC
CMMR/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Confirms that this is a ratesetting proceeding. Grants PG&E's motion for protective order. Sets the following schedule: notices of intent to claim compensation - 10/16/04; evidentiary hearing - 2/10/2005, opening briefs - 2/20/05, reply briefs/submission of the proceeding - 3/8/05; proposed decision - April 2005.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON September 20, 2004, AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF September 24, 2004. On September 15, 2004, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, Richard Myers and Eugene Cadenasso of the Energy Division and Sandy Lawrie, Team Leader, Energy Revenue Requirements, and Ray Blatter, Team Leader, Rates, PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Eisenman stated PG&E's objectives for the proceeding including balancing account treatment for noncore distribution revenue, better aligning rates with the cost to provide service to various customer classes, and reducing seasonal volatility in residential bills. Lawrie explained that PG&E is proposing to recover a balance of about $13 million in the Self-Generation Program Memorandum
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On September 15, 2004, Eric Eisenman, Chief of Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Richard Myers and Eugene Cadenasso of the Energy Division. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Eisenman stated PG&E's objectives for the proceeding including balancing account treatment for noncore distribution revenue, better aligning rates with the cost to provide service to various customer classes, and reducing seasonal volatility in residential bills. Lawrie explained that PG&E is proposing to recover a balance of about $13 million in the Self-Generation Program Memorandum Account on an equal-cent-per-therm basis. Blattner advocated for a minimum transportation charges of $5 per month for single family non-CARE customers, to reduce the differential between tier 1 and tier 2 residential rat
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to Application.
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2004
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COGENERATION COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
to the application.
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Application.
|
Type:
RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 2004
|
Filed By:
COMR/PUC
|
|
Description:
Resolution ALJ 176-3137; Ratification of preliminary determinations of category adopted.
|
Type:
APPLICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 39 G)
|
|
Description:
to revise its gas rates and tariffs to be effective July 1, 2005.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for protective order.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 4
|
Decision Number:
D0605019
|
Rendered Date:
May 11, 2006
Effective Date:
May 11, 2006
|
|
Description:
Modifies D05-06-029 for clarification and denies rehearing of D05-06-029, as modified. This proceeding is closed. (Comr. Bohn, being necessarily absent, did not participate.)
|
Decision Number:
D0604029
|
Rendered Date:
April 13, 2006
Effective Date:
April 13, 2006
|
|
Description:
Awards The Utility Reform Network $83,260.46 in compensation for its substantial contribution to D05-06-029. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0507001
|
Rendered Date:
July 1, 2005
Effective Date:
July 1, 2005
|
|
Description:
Corrects tables attached to D05-06-029 as Appendix A as provided in Appendix A of this order. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0506029
|
Rendered Date:
June 16, 2005
Effective Date:
June 16, 2005
|
|
Description:
Resolves all outstanding issues. This proceeding is closed. (Comr. Kennedy reserves the right to file a concurrence.)
|