|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (U6754C)
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 52
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 2008
|
Filed By:
City and County of San Francisco
The League of California Cities
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 2008
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Proposed Decision of ALJ Grau on Petitions for Modification of D.07-04-045.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 2008
|
Filed By:
City and County of San Francisco
League of California Cities
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 2008
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
Openiing; on Proposed Decision of Administrative Law Judge Grau on Petitions for Modification of D.07-04-045.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 2008
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GRAU/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Decision on Petitions for Modification. Opening comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due no later than July 28, 2008. Reply comments are due 5 days after opening comments are filed.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 5, 2008
|
Filed By:
City and County of San Francisco
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: City and County of San Francisco noticed oral and written communication with Jane Whang and Joseph Como, advisors to Cmmr. Chong, on March 5, 2008.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 2008
|
Filed By:
SUNESYS, LLC
|
|
Description:
The Sunesys, LLC noticed oral and written communication with Jane Whang and Joe Como, advisors to Cmmr. Grueneich on February 27, 2008.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 25, 2008
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
to the Reply of the League of California Cities and the City and County of San Francisco to NextG's Response in opposition to the Cities' Petition for Modification of Decision 07-04-045 (filing authorized by ALJ Grau per e-mail ruling of January 18, 2008).
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 14, 2008
|
Filed By:
City and County of San Francisco
The League of California Cities
|
|
Description:
To NextG's Response to Their Petition to Modify Decision 07-04-045.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 3, 2008
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
in opposition to Petition of League of California Cities and the City and County of San Francisco for Modification of Decision 07-04-045.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 2007
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
To Partial Opposition of League of California Cities, the City and County of San Francisco, and the City of Thousand Oaks to NextG's Petition for Modification of D.07-04-045.
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 2007
|
Filed By:
City and County of San Francisco
League of California Cities
|
|
Description:
of Decision 07-04-045.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 2007
|
Filed By:
City and County of San Francisco
City of Thousand Oaks
League of California Cities
|
|
Description:
Partial Opposition to NextG Networks of California, Inc.'s Petition for Modification of Decision 07-04-045 (late-filed authorized by ALJ Grau per email ruling dated December 5, 2007).
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 2007
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
of Decision 07-04-045.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 31, 2007
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GRAU/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Admitting exhibits into evidence.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 31, 2007
|
Filed By:
EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Description:
in Opposition to NextG Networks of California, Inc. Application for Rehearing of Decision 07-04-045.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2007
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
Application for Rehearing of Decision 07-04-045.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 2007
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 2007
|
Filed By:
EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on ALJ Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
Opening; on Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Description:
Opening; on ALJ Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
February 21, 2007
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GRAU/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion granting request for expanded authority and expedited environmental review and ordering further enforcement proceedings. Opening comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due no later than March 13, 2007. Reply comments are due 5 days after the filing of Opening comments.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2006
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
REPLY.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 2006
|
Filed By:
EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 2006
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
OPENING.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 2006
|
Filed By:
EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GRAU/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Setting Briefing Schedule and Denying Motion to Dismiss Protest. Opening Briefs are due on December 4, 2006 and Reply Briefs are due on December 11, 2006
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
to Correct the Record and accept Additional Evodence.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 2006
|
Filed By:
EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Motion of NextG to dismiss the protest of Clearlinx.
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 2006
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
Submitted; Volume 2.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks of California, Inc.
|
|
Description:
to Dismiss the Protest of Clearlinx Network Corporation.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/Grau/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Revises the schedule, as follows: 10/25 - ClearLinx serves testimony or the parties file a stipulation of facts; 11/6 - hearings, if necessary; opening and reply bries filed wihin 14 and 21 days respectively of the filing of stipulatd facts or the conclusion of hearings.
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 2006
|
Filed By:
CMMR/CHONG/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Confirms that this is a ratesetting proceeding. Sets hearings for November 6, 2006.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 2006
|
Filed By:
NextG Networks, Inc.
|
|
Description:
to the Motion of Clearlinx Network Corporation for Clarification of ALJ's Ruling Bifurcating Proceeding and Scheduling PHC.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 2006
|
Filed By:
CLEARLINX NETWORK CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
for clarification of ALJ's ruling bifurcating proceeding and scheduling prehearing conference.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GRAU/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Bifurcating proceeding and scheduling Prehearing Conference. Prehearing Conference is scheduled for Sept 13, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
Supplemental Attachment to the Response to the Sur-Reply of Clearlinx Network Corporation. (Filing authorized by ALJ Grau).
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to the sur-reply of ClearLinx Network Corporation.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On August 3, 2006, Edward O'Neill, counsel to NextG Networks of California, Inc. (NextG), spoke by telephone with Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Chong. O'Neill stated that through its protest, ClearLinx is clearly trying to take appropriately advantage of Commission process and procedure to obtain a competitive advantage over NextG. O'Neill stated that any issues regarding NextG's compliance with Commission rules and regulations pertaining to past telecommunications network construction can and should be fully considered without delaying action on NextG's request for modification of its certificate of public convenience and necessity.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 2006
|
Filed By:
CLEARLINX NETWORK CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to reply of NextG Networks of California, Inc. to the Protest of ClearLinx to the application of NextG to expand its existing Certicate of Public Convenience and Necessity.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to the protest of ClearLinx and the protest of the CCSF.
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
CLEARLINX NETWORK CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to the application.
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 2006
|
Filed By:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
|
|
Description:
to the application.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GRAU/CPUC
|
|
Description:
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN PROTEST PERIOD. Potests nd/o esponses sll be fled no lte tnl July 5, 200.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
June 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
CLEARLINX NETWORK CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to motion of NEXTG to shorten the protest period.
|
Type:
RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION
|
Filing Date:
June 15, 2006
|
Filed By:
COMR/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Resolution ALJ 176-3174; Ratification of preliminary determinations of category adopted.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
|
|
Description:
to Motion to Shorten the Protest Period.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
of Availability of (1) Application (2) Motion for Leave to File Financial Information Under Seal, and (3) Motion to Shorten Protest Period to Application.
|
Type:
APPLICATION
|
Filing Date:
May 19, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (U6754C)
|
|
Description:
to expand its existing Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity [A.02-09-019, D.03-01-061], to include full Facilities-based Telecommunications Services (Public Version).
|
Type:
FEES
|
Filing Date:
May 19, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
C.E.Q.A. Deposit per D.00-08-010: $200.00.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 19, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Shorten the Protest Period.
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 19, 2006
|
Filed By:
NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Motion for Leave to File Confidential Material Under Seal; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Attachment B to the Application filed concurrently herewith.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 4
|
Decision Number:
D0809019
|
Rendered Date:
September 10, 2008
Effective Date:
September 10, 2008
|
|
Description:
Corrects error. Closes proceeding.
|
Decision Number:
D0808010
|
Rendered Date:
August 21, 2008
Effective Date:
August 21, 2008
|
|
Description:
Dismisses without prejudice NextG Networks of California, Inc.'s petition for modification of Decision 07-04-045. Closes proceeding.
|
Decision Number:
D0707023
|
Rendered Date:
July 12, 2007
Effective Date:
July 12, 2007
|
|
Description:
Denies application for rehearing of Decision 07-04-045. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0704045
|
Rendered Date:
April 12, 2007
Effective Date:
April 12, 2007
|
|
Description:
Grants request for expanded authority and expedited environmental review, as set forth, and orders further enforcement proceedings. This proceeding is closed.
|