Word Document

Before The Public Utilities Commission Of The State Of California

Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's own Motion Into Competition for Local Exchange Service.

R.95-04-043

(Filed April 26, 1995)

   

Order Instituting Investigation on the Commission's own Motion Into Competition for Local Exchange Service.

I.95-04-044

(Filed April 26, 1995)

   
   

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................3

FINDINGS.....................................................................................................5

I. CHAPTER ONE: OVERVIEW OF NUMBERING 99

II. CHAPTER TWO: 5.43 MILLION UNUSED NUMBERS THE 707 AREA CODE 1919

III. CHAPTER THREE: NUMBER POOLING AND OTHER NUMBER CONSERVATION MEASURES 4545

CONCLUSION.............................................................................................53

APPENDICES...............................................................................................55

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Like much of the country, California currently is experiencing a numbering crisis. From 1947 to January 1997, the number of area codes in this state increased gradually from 3 to 13. During the next three years, however, the number of area codes in California nearly doubled. By the end of 1999, California had 25 area codes statewide. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) recently implemented several measures intended to ensure efficient use of telephone numbers. Without the implementation of major conservation measures, the telecommunications industry had plans underway to add 22 more area codes in California by the end of 2003, resulting in a statewide total of 47 area codes.

The utilization study sheds new light on the numbering crisis in the 707 area code. The data reveals that despite increasing demand for numbers, the 707 area code is not fully utilized. The study found that of the 7.75 million useable numbers in the 707 area code, approximately 5.43 million, or 70%, presently are not in use. The data further establishes that the 707 area code possesses considerable room for growth, and thus, aggressive measures such as splits or overlays are not yet warranted in the 707 area code. The report further urges the CPUC to seek from the FCC authority to implement Unassigned Number Porting (UNP) as a means to more efficiently use numbers still available in the 707 area code.

This report is filed in compliance with CPUC Decision (D.) 99-12-051, and with AB 406, enacted by the California Legislature in the 1999 legislative session. (Chapter 99-809, 1999.) AB 406, codified as Public Utilities Code Section 7937, requires the CPUC to obtain historical telephone number use data from every telecommunications company in California. The CPUC's Telecommunications Division (TD) first obtained and analyzed data from the 310 area code in Los Angeles late in 1999, and produced a utilization report on the 310 area code in March 2000. In November 2000, TD completed utilization reports covering the 415, 510, 818, and 909 area codes, and in March 2001 TD completed utilization reports covering the 408, 619, 650, and 714 area codes. TD released another four utilization reports in May 2001 covering the 323, 562, 916, and 925 area codes. This report on the 707 area code continues TD's analysis covering specific area code number utilization levels.

BACKGROUND

The 707 area code contains approximately 7.75 million telephone numbers available for consumer use. These numbers are available to telecommunications companies which obtain the numbers from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), 1 and in turn, assign the numbers to their customers for their immediate use. Alternatively, companies may reserve numbers for future use, or retain numbers for some internal (administrative) use. Some companies provide blocks of numbers to resellers or "dealers", which then assign those numbers to customers. The FCC deems numbers that companies allocate to resellers to be "intermediate" numbers. In addition, each assigned number, after disconnection, must "age" during a transition period before assignment to the next customer. Many companies have inventories of numbers in the "aging" process. Finally, some numbers are not available for public use, as they have been set aside for emergency purposes, for technical network support, or for other reasons. The FCC has defined numbers in these five categories - assigned, administrative, reserved, intermediate, or aging - as unavailable, either because they are already in use or are designated for some present or future use.

FINDINGS

TD's analysis shows that of the 5.43 million available numbers, approximately 1.65 million have been set aside by the CPUC to use in a lottery for companies seeking numbers. Companies possess the remaining unused 3.79 million numbers. Wireline carriers, such as Pacific Bell and many competitive local exchange carriers, hold roughly 2.76 million available numbers, while wireless carriers2 hold approximately 1.03 available numbers.

At the same time, the 707 study finds that under FCC rules about 2.47 million numbers cannot be contributed to the 707 number lottery, nor can they be contributed to the future 707 number pool for reassignment to other companies. The FCC has determined that wireless carriers do not have to participate in the pool at this time.3 In addition, the FCC has determined that the CPUC may only require wireline carriers to contribute to a number pool those blocks of 1,000 numbers that are 10% or less contaminated,4 meaning those blocks in which only 100 or fewer numbers are unavailable. However, wireline carriers may also keep a portion of the 10% or less contaminated blocks if they need to use those blocks within six months. The study further finds that of the 5.43 million numbers not in use, a maximum of 4.06 million numbers5 could be made available to companies through pooling if a) the companies donated blocks with higher contamination levels to the pool, and b) wireless carriers were required to participate in the 707 number pool. The first table below illustrates the current distribution of numbers assuming wireline pooling at 10% contamination. The second table shows the distribution that would occur if all the recommendations in this report were implemented.

In both graphs, numbers may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Finally, the study notes that companies identify 2.47 million numbers as unavailable. TD staff recommends specific measures the CPUC can employ to ensure that companies use those "unavailable" numbers more efficiently. Given the near doubling of the number of area codes in California, from 1996 to 1999, this vital public resource should be used as efficiently and effectively as possible. The CPUC and the telecommunications industry should strive to minimize the quantity of numbers left stranded in company inventories. The 707 Area Code Report recommendations are summarized in Appendix I.

I. CHAPTER ONE: OVERVIEW OF NUMBERING

California is currently experiencing an explosive demand for telephone numbers and area codes. The increased demand for numbers is due to many factors, including competition for local phone service, as well as the popularity of faxes, pagers, cell phones, internet services, etc. California's robust economy and the growth in the state's population also contribute to the increased demand for telephone numbers. This increase in demand is complicated by a number allocation system dating from the 1940s that is inefficient in today's competitive marketplace.

Prior to 1997, one phone company6 provided local telephone service to all customers in a particular area and new area codes were opened as the population grew. The number of California area codes rose steadily from three in 1947 to 13 in 1992, and stayed at that level until January 1997. During the next three years, however, the number of area codes in California nearly doubled. By the end of 1999, California had 25 area codes. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 sought to open competition for the local telephone service market and competitive local phone companies7 began to enter the marketplace, each requiring its own stock of numbers. The traditional system of number allocation was not designed to provide telephone numbers to more than one company.

In the past, when telecommunication companies needed telephone numbers to serve their customers, they received blocks of 10,000 numbers, i.e. prefixes. Because companies were assigned blocks of 10,000 numbers, they may have been assigned more numbers than they needed. For example, under this system, a company with only 500 customers would have received a 10,000 number block, the same quantity of numbers a company with 9,500 customers would receive. Thus, numbers are taken in these large blocks, creating an artificial demand for more numbers, which in turn fuels the need to open more area codes. The need to assign 10,000 numbers is a practice from the past when one telephone company provided service to all customers in its territory. Today, with over 200 telecommunications companies in the state needing numbers to serve customers, and with the limited quantity of numbers available in each area code, this process is no longer an efficient way to allocate numbers.

The rise in demand for numbers combined with the inefficient allocation system for numbers has forced the rapid opening of new area codes throughout the state. Since 1997, the number of area codes in California has nearly doubled to 25. Unless major changes occur, the CPUC projects that 22 more area codes would need to be opened in California by 2002. With more and more companies needing numbers of their own, new area codes are not necessarily the best solution.

The 707 area code was created in 1959 when it was split from 916, one of the three original area codes in California. The 707 area code serves portions of Local Access Transport Areas (LATAs) 722 and 726.

Today, the 707 area code serves Coastal Northern California, north from Vallejo to the Oregon border, southern portions of 707 located in the San Francisco, Santa Rosa, and Vallejo Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA). Portions of the 707 area code reside in a top 100 MSA and are available for pooling while rate centers not in the top 100 MSA's are not completely open to pooling trials. In December 1998 the North American Numbering Plan Administrator declared number exhaust jeopardy. The exhaust projection was for 1st Quarter 2001. The updated forecast estimates an exhaust date of second quarter 2005. After a series of public meetings in April and May 1999, the NANPA submitted in July 1999 for CPUC consideration an exhaust relief plan containing two alternatives for introducing a new area code into the area presently covered by 707, in order to provide additional numbers for phone company use. The alternatives submitted included a 3-way geographic split and a 2-way geographic split followed by an overlay. Subsequently, the CPUC issued a decision in December of 1999 adopting a three-way geographic split for the 707 area code8. That decision was deferred in July of 2000 to provide an opportunity to determine the feasibility of extending existing number resources, the purpose of this report9.

1. Monthly Lottery Allocates Prefixes

For those area codes nearing number exhaust, the CPUC has instituted a lottery process to fairly allocate the remaining prefixes among phone companies when demand exceeds supply. The 707 lottery began in July 1999. Currently, the CPUC distributes three prefixes (two initial and one growth10) in the monthly 707 lottery. Each company submits applications for initial and growth prefixes to the NANPA Code Administrator. If more applications are received than can be satisfied in that month, the first applicants chosen by random drawing are assigned a prefix and the remaining applicants are placed on a priority list and receive prefixes in one of the following months' lotteries in the order they were drawn. Once every company requesting a prefix has received one, a new drawing is held and additional companies are eligible to receive prefixes. Fifty-four prefixes have been allocated in the 707 area code through this process between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2000. With the CPUC working with companies to reclaim excess prefixes held by companies, thirty-six prefixes have been returned and reclaimed during the same period, for a net distribution of eighteen prefixes. During the first six months of 2001, eighteen prefixes have been allocated through the lottery, and four have been returned to NANPA, for a net distribution of fourteen prefixes. As of July 1, 2001 there were 144 prefixes available for assignment in the 707 area code.11

Recognizing the substantial social and economic burdens associated with constant area code changes, the CPUC has taken steps to resolve the numbering crisis. Responding to widespread public outcry over the proliferation of new area codes, the CPUC suspended, beginning in December 1999, all plans for new area codes previously approved. In July 2000, the CPUC adopted number conservation measures, including establishing number pooling trials, fill rates, and sequential numbering.

1. Number Pooling

The CPUC, with FCC approval, has implemented pooling trials in eight area codes, in order to boost the efficiency of phone number allocation. In addition, the CPUC has ordered pooling trials for six other area codes during 2001.

Number pooling allows telephone companies to receive numbers in smaller blocks than the traditional 10,000 numbers, enabling multiple providers to share a prefix, thereby utilizing this limited resource much more efficiently. The technology that enables the network to support the assignment of smaller blocks is referred to as Local Number Portability or LNP.12 LNP was originally mandated by the FCC as a means to enable customers to retain their telephone numbers when they switch telephone service to another local provider. This same platform is utilized for number pooling. The FCC had required all wireline carriers to become LNP-capable by the end of 1998 in the top 100 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in the country. Thirteen of the top 100 MSAs are located in California; the 707 area code is partially located in three of them, the San Francisco, Santa Rosa, and Vallejo Metropolitan Statistical Areas.13

Though LNP technology has existed for several years, the FCC later granted cellular and PCS companies an extension of time until November 2002 to become LNP-capable. The FCC gave paging companies a permanent exemption from the LNP requirement.14 Thus, at this time, only wireline carriers15 can participate in number pooling. In the area codes with number pooling, wireline carriers participate in pooling and wireless carriers participate in the lottery. In the remaining area codes in rationing, all phone companies participate in the lottery.

The CPUC has been aggressively setting up number pools. As of July 1, 2001, trials in eight area codes are up and running16. A pooling schedule has not been set for the 707 area code. Once pooling is implemented in the 707 area code, all LNP-capable companies in pooling NPA area codes will be required to donate 1,000-number blocks to the pooling administrator. Under the number-pooling program, all LNP-capable carriers receive numbers in blocks of 1,000 on an as-needed basis. There is no rationing process in the pool and the blocks received can be put into service almost immediately upon receipt. All non-LNP capable carriers will continue to receive numbers in blocks of 10,000 through the monthly lottery allocation process.

2. Improved Number Inventory Management

While pooling trials will improve the efficiency of the distribution of numbers to companies, companies have not had strong incentives to efficiently manage the numbers already allocated to them. Thus the CPUC ordered companies to improve number inventory management with measures including rules on fill rates and sequential numbering.

In July 2000, the CPUC issued Decision 00-07-052, which extended number conservation measures adopted in the 310 area code to other area codes within California. These number conservation measures include the following:

· Companies are required to return to the NANPA any prefix held for more than six months without being used.

· "Imminent exhaust criteria" are established in all area codes with lotteries or pooling trials. In each rate center in which companies request additional numbers, they must provide to NANPA a form demonstrating they will be out of numbers within three months17.

· Companies must satisfy a minimum 75% fill rate requirement before being eligible to request a growth prefix in any area code in rationing and before being eligible to receive a thousand-block through the number pool. Companies must assign numbers in thousand block sequence, assigning numbers in the next block only once a 75% fill rate has been attained in the prior block.

TD anticipates these policies will potentially free more numbers for use in number pooling, to be allocated through the lottery, or to be otherwise used by companies. Indeed, these measures together with the effects of number pooling have already achieved some positive results. For example, since the CPUC extended the 75% fill rate and imminent exhaust rules to all area codes, including 707, CPUC staff has observed that the demand for growth prefixes in each month's lottery has declined dramatically. Further evidence of the effectiveness of the CPUC's number conservation policies is the recent increase in the number of excess prefixes in the 707 area code being returned to the NANPA by companies.

3. CPUC Efforts at Federal Level

The FCC has exclusive jurisdiction over numbering in the United States. Therefore, the CPUC's number conservation policies (pooling, fill rates, and sequential numbering) are governed by the FCC's delegation of authority to the states. In recognition of the severity of the numbering crisis in California, the CPUC has aggressively petitioned the FCC for additional authority. As a result, the FCC has delegated authority to plan and implement area code changes, as well as authority to implement number conservation measures.

      a. Authority Regarding Pooling

On April 26, 1999, the CPUC filed a petition with the FCC requesting authority to institute number pooling trials and other number conservation measures within the state to better manage this public resource. On September 15, 1999, the FCC granted that petition, allowing the CPUC to institute mandatory number pooling on a trial basis, deploying it sequentially in one MSA at a time. When the FCC granted the CPUC the authority to deploy various numbering resource optimization strategies, including the authority to institute thousand-block numbering pooling trials, it also clarified that California's authority will be superseded by future national measures adopted by the FCC.

On March 31, 2000, the FCC released the Numbering Resource Optimization Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (first NRO Order).18 The first NRO Order sets forth rules for defining numbers, forecasting, tracking and auditing companies' use of numbers, and for conservation measures associated with number usage, including but not limited to number pooling. The definitions of numbers and timelines for aging and reserved numbers that were adopted in that order have been incorporated into the utilization data contained herein.

With the release of the first NRO Order, the FCC adopted a number of administrative and technical measures that will allow it to monitor more closely the way numbering resources are used and to promote more efficient use of numbering resources. In particular, the FCC adopted a nationwide system for allocating numbers in blocks of one thousand, rather than ten thousand, wherever possible, and announced its intention to establish a plan for national rollout of thousand-block number pooling.

Because the FCC recognized that state thousand-block number pooling trials underway might not conform to the national standards set forth in the first NRO Order, the FCC gave state commissions until September 1, 2000 to conform their thousand-block number pooling trials to the national framework. One requirement imposed in California which differs from the national standards is the requirement that companies meet a 75% fill rate in each block before they may receive an additional block from the pooling administrator. The CPUC recognized the 75% fill rate as a critical factor in the success of the 310 pooling trial and petitioned for a waiver of compliance with the national rules. On August 31, 2000, the FCC issued an order granting the CPUC authority to continue to use its pooling rules until the FCC decides on the merits of the petition, or until December 31, 2000, whichever occurs sooner. This allows California to continue applying the 75% utilization rate in its number pooling efforts.

On December 29, 2000, the FCC issued its Second Report and Order on Number Resource Optimization. In the second NRO Order, the FCC also ruled on California's Petition for Waiver, concluding that we may continue to use our utilization thresholds subject to parameters set in this order (when FCC thresholds exceed California's, we must migrate to the more stringent utilization thresholds). The FCC also declined to adopt a transition period between the time that covered CMRS carriers must implement LNP and the time they must participate in any mandatory number pooling.

The first NRO Order further constrains the CPUC by concluding that the rollout of thousand-block number pooling should first occur in area codes that are located in the largest 100 MSAs. In its comments prior to the release of the first NRO Order, the CPUC had argued that California might be precluded from exploring whether number pooling could alleviate the crises for number resources in many parts of the state that are located outside the top 100 MSAs. The CPUC believes the FCC should delegate authority to the states to order deployment of LNP. This grant of authority to California would make pooling possible throughout the state. The 707 area code has three top 100 MSA's where rate centers are located. Thirty-two of the rate centers in the 707 area code are located within MSA's that are listed in the top 100 MSA's. The Santa Rosa MSA has 11 rate centers, the San Francisco MSA has one rate center, and the Vallejo MSA holds 20 rate centers in the 707 area code. The remaining 44 rate centers are outside of the top 100 MSA's.

Currently, state commissions are constrained by the FCC from establishing an area code specifically for wireless telecommunications services. On April 26, 1999, the CPUC filed another petition with the FCC requesting authority to create service-specific or technology-specific area codes. In the 707 area code, wireless carriers hold 143 prefixes. If the CPUC were allowed to create a separate area code for those companies, these 143 prefixes in the 707 area code could be reassigned to other phone uses, thus prolonging the life of the existing area code. To date, the FCC has not acted on the CPUC's petition. In the Second Report and Order, the FCC asks for further comments on technology specific or non-geographic area codes.

On September 28, 2000, Governor Davis signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 1741, authored by Senator Bowen. SB 1741 requires the CPUC to request authority from the FCC to require telephone corporations to establish technology-specific area codes based on wireless and data communications, and to permit 7-digit dialing within both that technology-specific area code and the underlying pre-existing area code or codes. The bill requires the CPUC to use any authority so granted unless it makes a specified finding that there is reason not to do so. The legislation also prohibits the CPUC from implementing any authority granted by the FCC in a manner that impairs number portability. The petition that the CPUC filed with the FCC in April 1999 fulfills the technology-specific area code requirement set forth in the bill. The bill also prohibits the CPUC from approving new area codes unless a telephone utilization study has been performed and all reasonable telephone number conservation measures have been implemented.

4. Utilization Studies

Before requiring the residents and businesses of the 707 area code to undergo another area code change, the CPUC recognized the necessity of determining the number of telephone numbers that are in use and the number yet to be used. To that end, the CPUC instituted a utilization study of the 707 area code and required companies to provide usage data to the CPUC as of August 31, 2000. The TD contracted with NeuStar to collect the data; NeuStar submitted the aggregated data in its entirety to TD on December 1, 2000. The definitions used in the utilization study are included in Appendix A-1.

II. CHAPTER TWO: 5.43 MILLION UNUSED NUMBERS IN THE 707 AREA CODE

Of the 7.75 million numbers in the 707 area code, companies hold 6.10 million. The other 1.65 million numbers have yet to be assigned to companies. The CPUC's utilization study found that of the 6.10 million numbers held by companies, 3.78 million remain unused in their inventories. Therefore, 5.43 million numbers in the 707 area code remain unused. A portion of these unused numbers can be made available for use by all companies, through the monthly lottery allocation process. In addition, companies have reported 2.31 million numbers as unavailable. A portion of these unavailable numbers can be used more efficiently if the recommendations contained in this report are implemented.

C. THE SCOPE OF THE UTILIZATION STUDY

1. Distribution Statistics of Prefixes

The CPUC asked thirty-nine companies, holding 610 prefixes in the 707 area code, to report their utilization data with a reporting cut-off date of August 31, 2000. Table 2-1 shows the distribution of prefixes held in 707 by incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs), competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs),19 and wireless carriers in 76 rate centers.

2. Carriers Reporting

Of the 39 companies in the 707 area code, all companies submitted utilization data. A list of the companies that have been allocated numbers in the 707 area code appears in Appendix A.

3. Non-Reporting Companies

There were no non-reporting companies.

D. NUMBERS AVAILABLE IN THE 707 AREA CODE

1. 5.43 Million Numbers Available

The 707 area code has 5.43 million unused numbers. Of these unused numbers, TD found that companies held 3.78 million numbers in their inventories.20 These numbers held in inventory are currently not used but held in anticipation of future need. The remaining 1.65 million unused numbers are not yet assigned to companies and are made available in the monthly lottery. The breakdown of available numbers is shown in the table below.

__________________________________________________________________

Table 2-2

Summary of Available Numbers

Wireline Carriers 2,758,577

Wireless Carriers 874,660

Type 1 Carriers 151,356

Total Available Numbers Reported by Carriers 3,784,593

Total Available Numbers in the 707 Area Code 5,434,593

__________________________________________________________________

Not all of the 5.43 million unused numbers are immediately available to every company that wants numbers. Of the 5.43 million numbers, only 2.96 million numbers21 are estimated to be available to all companies via future pooling. The remaining 2.47 million unused numbers are only available to the companies who hold them. Pooling for the 707 area code has not as yet been scheduled. By setting up a pooling trial in the 707 area code and adopting recommendations in this report, 22 the CPUC could shift 1.10 million unused numbers to the category available to all companies. Of the 5.43 million unused numbers, those actions could result in making a maximum of 4.06 million numbers23 available to all companies with the remaining 1.2 million numbers available to the companies who hold them.

Current technology requires a company to be LNP-capable in order to donate numbers for another company to use. All wireline numbers in rate centers that are in the top 100 MSA's are required to be LNP-capable.24 Although a number pooling trial has not started for the 707 area25, TD analyzed the 707 utilization data by percentage contamination to determine the availability of numbers that potentially can be used in a number pool. Wireline companies hold 2.76 million unused numbers in the 707 area code. In order for the unused numbers to be retrieved from company inventories, the FCC requires these unused numbers to be retrieved from blocks which are 10% or less contaminated.26 Of the wireline companies' 2.76 million unused numbers 2.10 million are contained in 2,117 thousand-blocks held by LNP-capable carriers that are 10% or less contaminated. However, not all of these 2.10 million numbers can be retrieved from companies' inventories because companies need to have enough numbers to meet anticipated future need.27 Both the CPUC and the FCC have determined that six-months of inventory is a reasonable quantity to hold for future use.

The remaining 660,000 of the 2.76 million unused numbers cannot be retrieved, either because the numbers are in blocks greater than 10% contaminated or because they are in non LNP-capable blocks. However, companies can immediately use these numbers to provide service to their customers or meet other needs. Wireline carriers hold 551,000 numbers in blocks that are more than 10% contaminated.28 Non-LNP capable wireline carriers hold 110,000 of the 2.76 million unused numbers.

Wireless carriers hold 875,000 unused numbers in the 707 area code. Of these unused numbers, 656,000 are in blocks that are 10% or less contaminated, while 219,000 numbers are in blocks greater than 10% contaminated. Until wireless carriers become LNP-capable in November 2002, none of these numbers may be reallocated to other companies. In the interim, wireless carriers may assign these numbers to their own customers.

E. ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE NUMBERS

The CPUC requires each company participating in number pools to donate blocks that are 10% or less contaminated, excluding those retained for the six-month inventory.29

TD analyzed the 707 utilization data to determine the availability of numbers within blocks of different contamination levels to assess different contamination thresholds that could be employed in the number pool. The following table summarizes available numbers by contamination levels by rate center for wireline carriers.

Table 2-4

Wireline Available Numbers by Block Contamination Level

RATE CENTER

0

>0% to <= 10%

>10% to <=15%

>15% to <=20%

>20% to <=25%

ANNAPOLIS

13,000

5,826

850

0

0

ARCATA

23,000

3,856

0

1,600

0

BENICIA

34,000

27,266

1,755

2,431

798

BLUE LAKE

11,000

6,602

0

0

785

BODEGA BAY

18,000

5,833

2,637

0

0

BOONVILLE

13,000

6,828

0

0

0

BRIDGEVILLE

12,000

6,773

0

1,600

0

CALISTOGA

13,000

4,888

897

800

0

CAZADERO

16,000

5,838

0

1,600

0

CLEARLAKE OAKS

8,000

900

0

800

0

CLOVERDALE

14,000

11,635

0

1,600

0

COBB MOUNTAIN

2,000

4,797

0

848

781

COVELO

18,000

8,617

860

2,400

0

CRESCENT CITY

13,000

3,800

866

844

0

DIXON

45,000

5,814

0

1,600

0

ELK

18,000

6,762

852

2,440

789

EUREKA

41,000

10,699

0

800

0

FAIRFIELD SUISUN

45,000

38,314

2,677

3,241

768

FERNDALE

0

0

0

0

0

FORESTVILLE

9,000

2,976

899

834

0

FORT BRAGG

23,000

5,874

0

2,400

799

FORTUNA

13,000

1,899

0

1,646

0

GARBERVILLE

12,000

9,695

0

1,626

793

GEYSERVILLE

11,000

4,864

884

0

0

GUALALA

17,000

7,645

0

1,600

0

GUERNEVILLE

23,000

6,923

899

800

0

HEALDSBURG

35,000

6,745

899

800

1,582

HOPLAND

4,000

971

1,719

0

0

HYDESVILLE

3,000

6,855

1,746

0

0

KELSEYVILLE

25,000

10,788

899

800

0

KENWOOD

17,000

3,946

1,778

800

0

KLAMATH

0

6,590

871

1,607

0

LAKE BARRYESSA

13,000

5,790

899

2,441

2,358

LAKEPORT

12,000

3,985

0

0

799

LAYTONVILLE

19,000

11,638

892

1,600

1,536

LEGGETT

6,000

5,804

0

0

775

LOLETA

6,000

1,898

865

0

0

LOWER LAKE

15,000

4,974

0

800

0

MAD RIVER

20,000

8,556

890

800

0

Table 2-4 Continued

RATE CENTER

0

>0% to <= 10%

>10% to <=15%

>15% to <=20%

>20% to <=25%

           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           

MENDOCINO

9,000

4,762

0

800

785

MIDDLETOWN

3,000

924

0

0

0

MIRANDA

5,000

4,838

859

0

783

MONTE RIO

3,000

1,916

879

0

0

NAPA

49,000

26,337

2,694

800

796

NICE

0

910

878

1,676

0

OCCIDENTAL

26,000

12,718

1,751

0

786

ORICK

4,000

4,733

872

0

0

PEPPERWOOD

6,000

2,916

0

0

793

PETALUMA MAIN

99,000

31,943

2,660

800

4,746

PETALUMA SWIFT

42,000

8,788

2,694

1,600

788

PETROLIA

5,000

0

0

1,600

0

PIERCY

20,000

9,724

0

2,415

786

POINT ARENA

4,000

1,898

0

828

0

POTTER VALLEY

5,000

2,928

0

0

0

RIO DELL

14,000

4,861

0

2,443

0

RIO VISTA

14,000

1,899

899

2,400

0

SANTA ROSA

115,000

58,705

6,085

6,411

0

SEBASTOPOL

24,000

4,726

899

800

0

SMITH RIVER

0

0

1,722

4,917

799

SONOMA

39,000

23,728

898

800

0

ST. HELENA

20,000

11,380

1,776

1,600

0

TIMBER COVE

7,000

10,726

0

0

786

TIMBER COVE SEA RANCH DA

13,000

928

0

800

0

TOMALES

21,000

5,835

899

0

0

TRINIDAD

5,000

0

880

817

0

UKIAH

37,000

11,675

0

3,247

0

UPPER LAKE

21,000

3,907

0

2,429

0

VACAVILLE

30,000

24,253

898

2,416

798

VALLEJO

76,000

43,111

2,612

2,433

4,645

VALLEY FORD

13,000

2,956

1,784

819

0

WEOTT

19,000

6,805

0

1,600

775

WHITETHORN

7,000

2,908

851

0

0

WILLITS

14,000

6,797

0

2,400

0

WINDSOR

20,000

3,955

899

800

760

YOUNTVILLE

26,000

15,331

2,653

800

1,553

707 NPA DA

0

0

0

0

0

TOTALS

1,455,000

643,285

62,576

89,609

32,942

The first two numeric columns of Table 2-4 show the potential numbers available to the pooling trial, except for those numbers kept for companies' six-month inventory, under current rules. Available numbers in one rate center cannot be used in another rate center. Table 2-4 shows that one rate center, other than Directory Assistance, has no available numbers that companies could donate to the pool.

The last three columns of Table 2-4 capture available numbers in blocks that are greater than 10% contaminated but no more than 25% contaminated. Under the current number pool rules, companies retain thousand-blocks that are more than 10% contaminated. Increasing the contamination rate threshold from 10% to 25% would potentially free up an additional 185,12730 numbers for use in the number pool. TD cautions that although Table 2-4 shows potential results from increasing allowable contamination levels, further analysis and input from the industry may be necessary to determine accurately the quantity of additional numbers that can be added to the pool while still leaving companies with a six-month inventory.

As shown by Table 2-4 and also shown graphically in Table B-3 of Appendix B, most rate centers have available numbers from blocks of differing contamination levels up to 25%. The tables show that if the contamination ceiling for pooling were increased from 10% to 25%, more unused numbers exist in most rate centers that potentially could be donated to the pool.

Under current FCC rules, cellular and PCS companies are exempt from number pooling until November 2002 when they must become LNP-capable. The FCC has indefinitely exempted paging companies from becoming LNP capable. Table 2-5 shows available numbers in blocks of differing contamination levels held by wireless carriers. Wireless carriers hold 656,000 available numbers in blocks that are 10% or less contaminated, as shown in the first two columns of Table 2-5. Wireless carriers also have 96,000 available numbers in blocks with contamination levels greater than 10% but less than or equal to 25% as indicated by the last three columns of Table 2-5. Of these 656,000 unused numbers held by wireless carriers, TD estimates that 251,000 (38%) are held by paging companies. 31 TD staff is investigating whether there are methods to make some of these 251,000 unused numbers available to other carriers despite the FCC's exemption of paging companies from the LNP requirement.

Table 2-5

Wireless Available Numbers by Block Contamination Level

RATE CENTER

0%

>0% to <= 10%

>10% to <=15%

>15% to <=20%

>20% to <=25%

BENICIA

16,000

2,992

899

0

0

BOONVILLE

9,000

978

0

0

0

BRIDGEVILLE

9,000

900

0

0

0

CAZADERO

9,000

900

0

0

0

CLEARLAKE OAKS

0

0

0

5,600

767

CLOVERDALE

9,000

900

0

0

0

COVELO

9,000

900

0

0

0

CRESCENT CITY

7,000

7,834

0

0

1,573

DIXON

14,000

1,899

886

5,600

1,556

ELK

9,000

900

0

0

0

EUREKA

26,000

11,769

875

7,226

1,580

FAIRFIELD SUISUN

21,000

12,780

869

1,663

3,064

FORT BRAGG

9,000

9,834

0

6,400

1,543

GARBERVILLE

0

7,524

0

0

761

GUALALA

9,000

900

0

0

0

HEALDSBURG

8,000

1,996

0

0

0

LAKEPORT

9,000

7,814

0

0

790

LAYTONVILLE

18,000

900

0

800

0

LOWER LAKE

0

6,955

0

837

790

MIDDLETOWN

1,000

6,980

0

0

798

NAPA

16,000

4,856

884

5,600

1,521

OCCIDENTAL

9,000

900

0

0

0

PETALUMA MAIN

14,000

9,941

0

5,600

1,549

PETALUMA SWIFT

5,000

4,914

0

0

0

POINT ARENA

7,000

1,922

0

0

798

SANTA ROSA

108,000