Proceeding A0002039
Date Filed: February 25, 2000
Status: Closed


Documents    Decisions    Main Index

Filer Requested Category: Ratesetting
Preliminary Category: Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.

DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 24

Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE

Filing Date: April 15, 2004
Filed By:
ABOVENET COMMUNICATIONS, INC FKA METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: in support of alternate of Cmmr. Kennedy.

Type: ALTERNATE

Filing Date: April 8, 2004
Filed By:
CMMR/KENNEDY/PUC
Description: [imposing no penalty on MFNS]. Comments are due April 15, 2004; there will be no reply comments.

Type: COMMENTS

Filing Date: January 12, 2004
Filed By:
ABOVENET COMMUNICATIONS INC. F/K/A METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: on Draft Decision of ALJ Thomas.

Type: DRAFT DECISION

Filing Date: December 22, 2003
Filed By:
ALJ/THOMAS/PUC
Description: Opinion imposing penalty. Comments are due January 11, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.

Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION

Filing Date: June 15, 2001
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: Second; of Decision 00-09-039 and Request for Expedited Ex-Parte Relief

Type: LAW & MOTION

Filing Date: June 15, 2001
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: Motion for Leave to File Confidential Materials Under Seal; Confidential Matters Attached And Filed Under Seal, Namely, Confidential Customer Specific Information Contained in Its Second PEA Addendum Attached To Metromedia Fiber Network Services, Inc.'s Second Petition for Modification of D00-09-039 Filed Concurrently Herewith

Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING

Filing Date: May 21, 2001
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: Notice of Meeting with Cmmr. Lynch

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: May 3, 2001
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: supplemental, in response to ALJ Ruling of April 3, 2001

Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING

Filing Date: May 3, 2001
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETOWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: additional waiver of right to evidentiary hearing [pursuant to the April 3, 2001 ruling]

Type: RULING

Filing Date: April 3, 2001
Filed By:
ALJ/THOMAS/PUC
Description: Supplemental Ruling: rules that applicant (MFNS) shall notify the Commission by 5/3/2001 whether it desires a hearing on the issues set forth in this ruling. If so, a PHC will occur on 5/15/2001; MFNS shall file/serve a PHC statement by 5/9/2001. If not, MFNS shall file/serve by 5/3/2001a notice waiving such hearing and a brief addressing the issues.

Type: EXPARTE

Filing Date: March 29, 2001
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: Summary: On March 29, 2001, Edward W. O?Neill, outside counsel for Metromedia Fiber Network Services, Inc. (MFNS), had a telephone communication with ALJ Thomas. O?Neill stated that MFNS? petition for modification seeks two different forms of relief: approval to construct specific route changes, laterals and customer connections to MFNS? San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles area networks; and approval of a procedure for more expeditious approval of future route changes, laterals and customer connections. O?Neill further stated that if it appears likely that a decision on the matter will be delayed much longer, MFNS may want to request an interim decision.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: February 21, 2001
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: in response to January 3, 2001 ALJ Ruling

Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING

Filing Date: February 13, 2001
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: Waiver of Right to Evidentiary Hearing.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: January 3, 2001
Filed By:
ALJ/THOMAS/PUC
Description: sets procedure for second phase: Applicant shall notify the Commission by 2/2/2001 whether it desires an evidentiary hearing. If Applicant does, a PHC will occur on 2/21/2001; Applicant shall file a PHC statement 5 days prior to PHC. If Applicant does not, it shall file a notice by 2/2/2001 stating it waives such hearing and file a brief by 2/21/2001(INTERNET Users: Click on "RULING" for the full text.)

Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION

Filing Date: November 9, 2000
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: (U-6030-C); of D00-09-039

Type: LAW & MOTION

Filing Date: November 9, 2000
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: Motion for Leave to File Confidential Information Contained in the PEA Addendum Under Seal; Confidential Material attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Customer addresses and/or locations

Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING

Filing Date: November 9, 2000
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: PEA Addendum to Support the Petition to Modify the Existing Mitigated Negative Declaration (d.00-09-039) [REDACTED VERSION]

Type: DRAFT DECISION

Filing Date: August 22, 2000
Filed By:
ALJ/THOMAS/PUC
Description: Draft Decision of ALJ Thomas. Mailed 08/22/2000. [Per Chief ALJ Lynn Carew: The time for filing Comments is shortened to 15 days. Comments are due no later than 09/06/2000.MMN.]

Type: NOTICE

Filing Date: July 21, 2000
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: in compliance with Rule 17.1(f)(1)(A) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure

Type: RULING

Filing Date: May 26, 2000
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
Description: ALJ's Ruling. [Text (summary only): (1)The May 19, 2000 Motion of Metropolitan Fiber Network Services, Inc. (MFNS) to modify Rule 17.1(f)(1)(A) is denied; (2) The request in the May 19, 2000 motion to exempt MFNS from the requirement to provide notice by direct mail to all owners of land adjacent to the proposed fiber optic construction project of MFNS is denied.END.MMN.]

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: May 19, 2000
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: Motion to Modify Rule 17.1(F)(1)(A) Notice Requirements.

Type: AMENDMENT

Filing Date: March 24, 2000
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: to application. [The Amendment supplements the PEA attached as Exhibit D to the Application to provide a Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Survey and Inventory Report for the proposed construction.]

Type: RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION

Filing Date: March 21, 2000
Filed By:
COMR/PUC
Description: Resolution ALJ 176-3035; Ratification of preliminary determinations of category adopted

Type: APPLICATION

Filing Date: February 25, 2000
Filed By:
METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Description: for Modification of its Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.

DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 4

Decision Number: D0404068

Rendered Date: April 22, 2004
Effective Date: April 22, 2004
Description: Imposes no penalty on MFNS due to the mitigating facts in the record. This proceeding is closed. (Comr. Kennedy reserves the right to file a concurrence; Comr. Lynch will file a dissent; and Comr. Wood reserves the right to file a dissent).

Decision Number: D0109018

Rendered Date: September 6, 2001
Effective Date: September 6, 2001
Description: Grants the Second Petition of MFNS for Modification of D00-09-039, in which MFNS seeks authorization of 90 modifications to its fiber optic project in the San Francisco and Los Angeles areas. Withdraws MFNS? motion for protective order.

Decision Number: D0105056

Rendered Date: May 14, 2001
Effective Date: May 14, 2001
Description: Interim decision ? grants, in part, the petition of MFNS for modification of D00-09-039 to include in the approval of a San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles Basin fiber optic project approval of 80 additional project modifications. These modifications may be constructed subject to mitigation measures designed to project the environment. The Commission defers the other aspects of MFNS' Petition for Modification to a later decision.

Decision Number: D0009039

Rendered Date: September 7, 2000
Effective Date: September 7, 2000
Description: Approves a mitigated negative declaration prepared pursuant to the CEQA and authorizes MFNS to resume work on a fiber optic cable and conduit installation project in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Los Angeles Basin (Project); leaves open the question whether MFNS should be sanctioned for not complying with CEQA before commencing the Project

Top of Page    Documents    Decisions    Main Index