|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 223
(only the most current 100 are displayed)
Display all documents for this proceeding
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to SDG&E's Opposition to UCAN's Request for Intervenor compensation. (Filed per authorization from ALJ John Wong.)
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ Wong.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to UCAN Request for Intervenor Compensation.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due February 9, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for Intervenor Compensation.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 17, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Quarterly Report identifying amount and adjustments to the AB 265 Undercollection.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 24, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Quarterly Report Identifying Amount and Adjustments to the AB 265 Undercollection.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 29, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Quarterly Report identifying amount and adjustments to the AB 265 Undercollection.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Quarterly Report idenifying amount and adjustments to the AB265 Undercollection.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 31, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
in compliance with D02-12-064: Quarterly Report Identifying the Amount and Adjustments to the AB 265 Undercollection.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[in compliance with Ordering Paragraphs 5 and 6 of D02-12-064: Quarterly Report Identifying the amount and adjustments to the AB 265 undercollection.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Quarterly Report Identifying Amount and Adjustment to the AB265 Undercollection.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 26, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Quarterly Report Identifying amount and Adjustments to the AB 265 Undercollection
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
February 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
UTILITY CONSUMERS ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for award of compensation
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 13, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Applications for Rehearing of Decision 02-12-064.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
of Decision 02-12-064.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
of Decision 02-12-064.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of Decision 02-12-064
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
January 2, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Quarterly; identifying amount and adjustments to the AB 265 Undercollection.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Comments on Proposed Alternate Decision of President Lynch.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/LINSEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 2, 2002, Steve Linsey, Supervisor, Office of Ratepayer Advocates, met with Cmmr. Brown in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Kevin Coughlan and Peter Arth, advisors to Cmmr. Peevey, Sara Myers for the City of San Diego, Norm Furuta for Federal Executive Agencies, Ron Liebert for California Farm Bureau Federation, and Jeff Parrott and W. Davis Smith for Sempra/San Diego Gas & Electric Company. Linsey addressed the numerous and substantial flaws of the revised alternate sponsored by Cmmr. Peevey. Linsey expressed concern that it exempted the utility as well as the Commission itself from the Commissions own rules. Linsey also noted significant substantive problems with the revised alternate.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On December 2, 2002, Jeffrey M. Parrott, representing San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Cmmr. Wood in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Steve Linsey of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Norman Furuta of the Federal Executive Agencies, Ronald Liebert for the California Farm Bureau Federation and Sara Steck Myers for the City of San Diego. Parrott stated that conducting settlement discussions with the parties would not be productive. Parrott stated that SDG&Es last and best proposal for a fair and equitable settlement relative to certain intermediate term contracts was embodied in SDG&Es proposed settlement agreement with the Commission in the Federal Court litigation. Parrott also discussed certain minor modifications to the proposed decision and the alternate. Parrott reminded the meeting participants that it was utility shareholders, not ratepayers, who incurred price risk under AB 1890, and in SDG&Es case SDG&E management
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
regarding ex parte communications
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 5, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY
|
|
Description:
On October 31, 2002, Bill Reed, Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (SEU), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President of SEU. Reed referred to additions to the proposed decision (PD) and stated that there was a lack of due process on the section 815 issue raised in the revisions. Reed noted that neither section 851 nor affiliate rules are applicable in this instance. Reed explained that the contracts were never intended for dedication to public use such that they never became used and useful to San Diego Gas & Electric Company in the provision of its public utility services.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 5, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY
|
|
Description:
On October 31, 2002, Bill Reed, Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (SEU), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President of SEU. Reed referred to additions to the proposed decision (PD) and stated that there was a lack of due process on the section 815 issue raised in the revisions. Reed noted that neither section 851 nor affiliate rules are applicable in this instance. Reed explained that the contracts were never intended for dedication to public use such that they never became used and useful to San Diego Gas & Electric Company in the provision of its public utility services.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
On October 29, 2002, Lee Schavrien, Vice President Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (SEU), met with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, for SEU. Schavrien stated that if the Commission were to just reflect what the proposed decision (PD) said the ROE recommendation for San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) would be at least 11.4%. Schavrien further stated that the PD correctly reflects that AA bond rates decreased for the other IOU's but increased by 129 basis points for SDG&E; however, the PD fails to reflect that increase in its recommendation. Schavrien stated further that in a departure from the language stating that the PD would adopt the high end of the range and contrary to what was proposed for the other two IOUs, it adopts the mid-point of SDG&E's range which was 50 basis points lower than the high end of the range. Katz stated that SDG&E believes that the PD ignores the facts in the case when it select
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 22, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/LINSEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
On October 15, 2002, Steve Linsey, supervisor, Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Brown in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were David Gamson and Peter Hanson, advisors to Cmmr. Brown, Steve Weissman and Bill Julian, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, Laura Krannawitter, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, Kevin Coughlan and Peter Arth, advisors to Cmmr. Peevey, Sara Myers, Fritz Orlieb and William Monsen for the City of San Diego, Norm Furuta for Federal Executive Agencies, Michael Shames for Utility Consumer Action Network, and Jeff Parrott, Leslie Katz, William Reed and Lee Schavrien for San Diego Gas & Electric Company. Linsey stated that the alternate of Cmmr. Peevey failed to meet the standards the Commission applied to settlements, among various other failings. Linsey noted that typically a finding of public interest was predicated on the breath of support, and no consumer group supported the settlement. Linsey stated that the alternate's claim that it is consistent with law is declar
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
To the Comments of SDG&E on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Wong
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Proposed Decision of ALJ Wong.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Proposed Decision of Commissioner Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Proposed Decision of Commissioner Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
on alternate decision of Com Peevey.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILTIES
|
|
Description:
On October 15, 2002, William Reed, Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (SEU), met, on behalf of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) with Cmmr. Brown in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were David Gamson and Peter Hanson, advisors to Cmmr. Brown, Steven Weissman and Bill Julian, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Laura Krannawitter, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, and Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, for SEU, and Jeff Parrott, Attorney for Sempra Energy. Reed stated that the proposed decision acknowledges the fact that the Intermediate Term Contracts were in fact treated as shareholder assets, but it then proceeds to use its interpretation of the language contained in Public Utilities Code Section 332.1 as the basis for reaching its determination that the profits from June 2000 to January 2001 were ratepayer assets. Reed argued that the language in 332.1 was not definitive as to what generatio
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILTIES
|
|
Description:
On October 15, 2002, William Reed, Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (SEU), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Lee Schavrien, Vice President, and Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, for SEU. Schavrien stated that the proposed decision acknowledges the fact that the Intermediate Term Contracts were in fact treated as shareholder assets, but it then proceeds to use its interpretation of the language contained in Public Utilities Code Section 332.1 as the basis for reaching its determination that the profits from June 2000 to January 2001 were ratepayer assets. Schavrien argued that the language in 332.1 was not definitive as to what generation asset revenues should be used to offset any undercollection. Schavrien also stated that he Commission's upside potential in the Federal litigation represented approximately 25% of its potential downside impact should SDG&E prevail in the court case. Katz and Reed noted the alternate
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES
|
|
Description:
on alternate decision of Com Peevey re SDG&E's request for a surcharge to recover the AB 265 undercollection.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
on alternate decision of Com Peevey
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ Wong.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2002
|
Filed By:
FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/CPUC
|
|
Description:
in support of the proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2002
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Wong.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 11, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
On October 8, 2002, Lee Schavrien, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (SEU), met with Lynne McGhee, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco. Also present was Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, for SEU. Schavrien stated that the proposed decision acknowledges the fact that the Intermediate Term Contracts were in fact treated as shareholder assets, but it then proceeds to use its interpretation of the language contained in Public Utilities Code Section 332.1 as the basis for reaching its determination that the profits from June 2000 to January 2001 were ratepayer assets. Schavrien argued that the language in 332.1 was not definitive as to what generation asset revenues should be used to offset any undercollection. Schavrien also stated that he Commission?s upside potential in the Federal litigation represented approximately 25% of its potential downside impact should SDG&E prevail in the court case.
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
October 10, 2002
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Proposed Alternate Decision [Opinion Regarding San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Request For A Surcharge To Recover The AB 265 Undercollection And Decision Adopting Settlement Agreement] mailed 10/10/2002 (Comments are due by 10/17/2002; no reply comment will be accepted.)
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 1, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to UCAN Motion seeking sanctions.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
September 24, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
[Opinion Regarding San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Request For A Surcharge To Recover The AB 265 Undercollection] mailed 9/24/2002 (Comments are due by 10/14/2002; reply comments due 5 days after comments are filed. Opening comments shall not exceed 15 pages.)
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 16, 2002
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
seeking sanctions for failure to comply with Assigned Commissioner's Ruling.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 2002
|
Filed By:
CMMR/WOOD/PUC
|
|
Description:
establishing an additional public participation hearing in Carlsbad
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply brief
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
Reply brief
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 2002
|
Filed By:
FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES
|
|
Description:
reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 2002
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Reply brief (per ALJ Wong's Ruling)
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 2002
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
|
|
Description:
Reply Brief
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
July 25, 2002
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
|
|
Description:
Opening Brief
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
opening Brief
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
Opening Brief on issues related to the implementation of Assembly Bill 265
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 2002
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
opening Brief
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Opening Brief addressing the appropriate treatment of certain power procurement contracts and the proposed rate sucharge to recover the AB 265 undercollection after 2002
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 23, 2002
|
Filed By:
CMMR/WOOD/PUC
|
|
Description:
establishing an additional public participation hearing on 8/14/2002.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 12, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
On July 9, 2002, Judy Peck, Regulatory Relations Manager, Sempra Utilities, spoke by telephone with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Peck referred to the current balance in the ERSA Account and stated that it includes the $100 million reduction from the Reasonableness Review Settlement. Peck explained that CTC revenue over-collections and balancing account reductions will continue to be applied, as available, to further reduce the ERSA balance.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
Comments on the Draft Decision of ALJ Wetzell dated 6/17/2002
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 2002
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
On Proposed Settlement Agreement; pursuant to the June 18th ruling by Commr. Wood
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
Comments on SDG&E's proposed federal litigation settlement agreement (per ACR of 6/18/2002)
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On the Draft Decision of ALJ Wetzell
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
On the Proposed Settlement submitted by SDG&E on June 14, 2002
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 2002
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
On the Draft Decision of ALJ Wetzell dated June 17, 2002 concerning SDG&E's motions for stay and reconsideration of the ACR
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 24, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Proof of Compliance with Rule 52 of the commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
|
|
Description:
to the Motion of SDG&E to strike the reply testimony of the Alliance For Retail Energy Markets
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 20, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
To ACR of June 18, 2002
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
CMMR/WOOD/PUC
|
|
Description:
establishing a schedule for consideration of a proposed settlement submitted by SDG&E on 6/14/2002: Comments are due by 7/8/2002. SDG&E shall file ex parte notices by 6/20/2002.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
In opposition to SDG&E's motion to strike
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
To strike the reply testimony of the Alliance For Retail Energy Markets
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WETZELL/PUC
|
|
Description:
[Opinion on Motions for Stay and Reconsideration of Assigned Commissioner's Ruling] mailed 6/17/2002 (Comments are due by 7/7/2002; reply comments due 5 days after comments are filed. Opening comments shall not exceed 15 pages.)
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WETZELL/PUC
|
|
Description:
(1) on UCAN's motion to resituate and reschedule preliminary and evidentiary hearings, (2) on UCAN's supplemental notice of intent to claim compensation, and (3) directing production of exhibit compiling responses to Energy Division data requests
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 11, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
To strike a portion of the testimony of the ORA
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 2002
|
Filed By:
CMMR/WOOD/PUC
|
|
Description:
clarifying Assigned Commissioner's Ruling of 5/16/2002
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 6, 2002
|
Filed By:
FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES
|
|
Description:
To Motion of UCAN
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 6, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Compliance with Rule 24, Paragraphs 2 and 3 in A01-01-044
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 6, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
To UCAN's Motion to resituate and reschedule preliminary and evidentiary hearings
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 4, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WETZELL/PUC
|
|
Description:
shortening time for responses to Utility Consumers' Action Network's Motion to Resituate and Reschedule Preliminary and Evidentiary Hearings: due by 6/6/2002
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 3, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
|
|
Description:
In opposition to Motions of SDG&E for (A) issuance of ex parte stay of ACR directing service of documents and filing of ex parte communication notices and for (B) reconsideration to full Commission of ACR directing service of documents and filing of ex parte communication notices
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 3, 2002
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
To SDG&E's Motion for reconsideration to the full Commission of ACR directing (1) service of documents and (2) filing of notice of ex parte communication
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 29, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WETZELL/PUC
|
|
Description:
shortening time for responses to two motions of San Diego Gas & Electric Company: responses due by 6/3/2002
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 29, 2002
|
Filed By:
UCAN
|
|
Description:
To resituate and reschedule preliminary and evidentiary hearings
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
May 29, 2002
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Supplement to notice of intent to claim compensation
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 22, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for the Issuance, on an Ex Parte Basis, of an Immediate Stay of Assigned Commissioner's Ruling directing (1) Service of Documents and (2) Filing of Notice of Ex Parte Communication.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 20, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
To ACR directing (1) service of documents and (2) filing of notice of ex parte communications
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/PRESTIDGE/PUC
|
|
Description:
requiring additional information to be filed by 6/3/2002
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2002
|
Filed By:
CMMR/WOOD/PUC
|
|
Description:
directing San Diego Gas and Electric Company to serve the letter from Sempra Energy by 5/20/2002 and to file notices of ex parte communication
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On May 6, 2002, Lee Schavrien, Director of Regulatory Affairs of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), had a telephone conversation with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey. Schavrien stated that should the Commission and SDG&E settle the lawsuit pending before the Federal District Court regarding the Intermediate-Term contracts, SDG&E would be prepared to withdraw its surcharge proposal. Schavrien further stated that on May 7, 2002 he would e-mail to Mr. Coughlan and Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, a confidential draft of the terms of a proposed settlement agreement pertaining to the Federal District Court lawsuit.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MINKIN/PUC
ALJ/WETZELL/PUC
|
|
Description:
regarding review of certain San Diego Gas & Electric Company power procurement contracts
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 2002
|
Filed By:
CMMR/WOOD/PUC
|
|
Description:
vacating suspension of procedural schedule, updating the scope, and revising the schedule as follows: SDG&E's updated prepared testimony served - 4/26/2002; Prepared testimony of other parties served - 5/29; Rebuttal testimony served - 6/14; Prehearing conference - 6/19; Evidentiary hearings - 6/24-28; Opening briefs - 7/24; Reply briefs - 8/5; Proposed decision - 9/13; Comments on PD - 10/3; Reply comments on PD - 10/8; Final Oral Argument - 10/11; Commission decision - 10/17.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 2002
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
UTILITY CONSUMERS ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for award of compensation
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WETZELL/PUC
|
|
Description:
rules that The Utility Reform Network is eligible to file for an award of intervenor compensation
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 3, 2001
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to SDG&E Comments on Joint Proposal; pursuant to the November 16. 2001, Ruling of AC Wood
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 30, 2001
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
|
|
Description:
On November 27, 2001, Karen Norene Mills, attorney for the California Farm Bureau Federation (Farm Bureau), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were Linda Serizawa and Steven Weissman, advisors to Cmmr. Wood. Mills stated Farm Bureau's support of the Joint Proposal as a balanced solution for all San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) ratepayers, including agricultural customers. Mills stated that those customers have not contributed to ERCRSA, yet under the SDG&E Memorandum of Understanding would be expected to contribute funds accrued on their behalf to reduce the ERCRSA, most notably from the TCBA.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
November 29, 2001
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of Intent to Claim Compensation
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 29, 2001
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY
|
|
Description:
On November 26, 2001, Lee Schavrien, Director of Regulatory Affairs of Sempra Energy (Sempra), met with Laura Krannawitter, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, and with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. Also present was Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President for Sempra. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Schavrien explained how, under San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Memorandum of Understanding, the AB 265 Revenue Shortfall Balancing Account would be eliminated without raising base electric rates.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 26, 2001
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Comments on Joint Proposal
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 2001
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
for Award of Compensation.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 13
|
Decision Number:
D0509011
|
Rendered Date:
September 8, 2005
Effective Date:
September 8, 2005
|
|
Description:
Grants $78,191.31 in intervenor compensation to UCAN for its substantial contributions to D02-12-064, D03-08-072, and for its participation in the subsequent judicial review in the California Court of Appeal. These proceedings are closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0502038
|
Rendered Date:
February 24, 2005
Effective Date:
February 24, 2005
|
|
Description:
Closes remaining matters. These proceedings are closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0308082
|
Rendered Date:
August 28, 2003
Effective Date:
August 28, 2003
|
|
Description:
Corrects a clerical error in D03-08-072.
|
Decision Number:
D0308072
|
Rendered Date:
August 21, 2003
Effective Date:
August 21, 2003
|
|
Description:
Rehearing of D02-12-064, as modified, is denied. (Comrs. Lynch and Wood reserve the right to file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0305013
|
Rendered Date:
May 8, 2003
Effective Date:
May 8, 2003
|
|
Description:
Awards Aglet $15,859.92, TURN $5,889.02 and UCAN $36,063.30 for their substantial contributions to D02-12-064 as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0212064
|
Rendered Date:
December 19, 2002
Effective Date:
December 19, 2002
|
|
Description:
Approves the June 14, 2002 settlement agreement proposed by SDG&E. SDG&E shall file a quarterly report in this docket, or in another docket as may be directed by the ruling, on the first business day of each month, until the AB 265 undercollection is eliminated. (Pres. Lynch will file a dissent. Comr. Wood will file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0210051
|
Rendered Date:
October 24, 2002
Effective Date:
October 24, 2002
|
|
Description:
Awards $13,430.72 in compensation for its substantial contribution to D02-01-063 as set forth. Closes A93-12-025 and I94-02-002.
|
Decision Number:
D0203037
|
Rendered Date:
March 21, 2002
Effective Date:
March 21, 2002
|
|
Description:
Grants Aglet Consumer Alliance an award of $15,555.00 in compensation for contribution to D01-09-059.
|
Decision Number:
D0112015
|
Rendered Date:
December 11, 2001
Effective Date:
December 11, 2001
|
|
Description:
Grants the July 16, 2001 motion of SDG&E to the extent set forth. SDG&E shall file an application for a permanent utility-retained cost recovery within 30 days of this decision.
|
Decision Number:
D0111021
|
Rendered Date:
November 8, 2001
Effective Date:
November 8, 2001
|
|
Description:
Grants SDG&E?s petition to modify D01-09-059 by making minor changes to Schedules DR-TOU and DR-TOU-2.
|
Decision Number:
D0110035
|
Rendered Date:
October 10, 2001
Effective Date:
October 10, 2001
|
|
Description:
Denies the City of San Diego's application for rehearing of D01-09-059.
|
Decision Number:
D0109059
|
Rendered Date:
September 20, 2001
Effective Date:
September 20, 2001
|
|
Description:
Authorizes rate increases applicable to electric customers of SDG&E in accordance with Assembly Bill X1 1, establish an interim charge of 9.02 cents per kWh, determines that an interim retail rate increase of 1.46 cents per kWh is required to implement DWR?s revenue requirement for SDG&E's retail end customers, etc. the rate increase to take effect September 30, 2001, as set forth. (Com Bilas dissented).
|
Decision Number:
D0105060
|
Rendered Date:
May 14, 2001
Effective Date:
May 14, 2001
|
|
Description:
Interim Opinion ? Implements a portion of Assembly Bill (AB) X1 43 (Stats. 2001, Ch.6), which was approved by Governor Gray Davis on April 11, 2001. This proceeding shall remain to consider further implementation of ABX1 43 and other remaining unresolved issues.
|