|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
Ratesetting
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 1737
(only the most current 100 are displayed)
Display all documents for this proceeding
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 2008
|
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network
|
|
Description:
Supplemental; of Intent to Claim Compensation covering Judicial Review-Related Work.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 2008
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/CPUC
|
|
Description:
regarding shortening of time for any application for rehearing of Decision 08-04-025.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 2008
|
Filed By:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 2008
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision granting, in part, Pacific Gas and Electric Company's petition to modify Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 2008
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Proposed Decision of ALJ Wong Modifying Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2008
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision of ALJ Wong modifying Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2008
|
Filed By:
DRA/TUDISCO/CPUC
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Wong granting, in part, the petition to modify Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2008
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision granting, in part, Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Petition to Modify Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2008
|
Filed By:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 2008
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
Southern California Edison Company noticed an oral and written ex parte communications with Andrew Campbell, Advisor to Cmmr Chong, on March 10, 2008.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 2008
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: Southern California Edison Company noticed written and oral communication with Robert Mason, advisor to Cmmr. Simon, March 10, 2008.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 2008
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Order granting, in part, the Petition to Modify Decision 05-06-060. Opening comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due no later than March 31, 2008. Reply comments are due 5 days after the filing of Opening comments.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 2008
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: PG&E noticed oral communication with Matthew Deal and Jack Stoddard, advisors to Pres. Peevey, on March 4, 2008.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 2008
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: Southern California Edison Company noticed written and oral communication with Robert Kinosian, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, on March 5, 2008.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 2008
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
Southern California Edison Company noticed oral and written communications with President Peevey on March 4, 2008.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
February 13, 2008
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
to Responses to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Petition to Modify Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 2008
|
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network
|
|
Description:
to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's Petition for Modification of Decision 05-06-060 regarding allocation of Department of Water Resources revenue requirements.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 2008
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
to Petition of Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Modify Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 2008
|
Filed By:
DRA/PELEO/CPUC
|
|
Description:
to Petition of Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Modify Decision 05-06-060 regarding the method for allocating Department of Water Resources revenue requirements.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 2008
|
Filed By:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
|
|
Description:
to the Petition to Modify Decision 05-06-060 of PG&E.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2008
|
Filed By:
California Large Energy Consumers Association
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Modification of Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 2008
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: Southern California Edison Company noticed oral communication with Pres. Peevey, on January 29, 2008.
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2008
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
of Decision 05-06-060 regarding the Method for Allocating Department of Water Resources Revenue Requirements.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2008
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
to Shorten the Time Period for Responding to PG&E's Petition to Modify Decision 05-06-060. (Per ALJ John Wong Email dated Jan 23, 2008, Responses to this Motion shall be filed and electronically served on or before January 28, 2008. MMN)
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2007
|
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network c/o Robert Finkelstein
|
|
Description:
Fourth; for Substantial Contributions to Various Decisions regarding the Allocation of DWR Revenue Requirements.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/Allen/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Applies section 1731(c) to D06-11-003, in particular the 10-day time for filing applications for reharing. Any applications for rehearing of D06-11-003 are due November 27, 2006; responses to any applications for rehearing - December 7th.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION ALLOCATING THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES NATURAL GAS CONTRACT.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; ON DRAFT DECISION OF ALJ ON DRAFT DECISION ALLOCATING THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOUCES NATURAL GAS CONTRACT.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
|
|
Description:
Reply [on the draft decision].
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On October 2, 2006, Sidney Dietz, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Dietz stated that PG&E agrees with the spirit of the draft decision (DD) that the benefits from the Williams gas contract be shared among all California customers. Dietz continued that the DD does not achieve this sharing of benefits. Dietz stated that under PG&E's proposed sharing method, the benefits of the Williams gas contract would go to customers of all three utilities.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On October 2, 2006, Sidney Dietz, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Dietz stated that PG&E agrees with the spirit of the draft decision (DD) that the benefits from the Williams gas contract be shared among all California customers. Dietz continued that the DD does not achieve this sharing of benefits. PG&E stated that under PG&E's proposed sharing method, the benefits of the Williams gas contract would go to customers of all three utilities.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On September 29, 2006, Sidney Dietz, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Brian Cherry, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Dietz stated that PG&E agrees with the spirit of the draft decision (DD) that the benefits from the Williams gas contract be shared among all California customers. Dietz continued that the DD does not achieve this sharing of benefits. PG&E stated that under PG&E's proposed sharing method, the benefits of the Williams gas contract would go to customers of all three utilities.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT DECISION ALLOCATING THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES NATURAL GAS CONTRACT.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 2006
|
Filed By:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
|
|
Description:
TO THE DRAFT DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE ALLEN ALLOCATING THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF A DWR NATURAL GAS CONTRACT.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 2006
|
Filed By:
Pacfic Gas and Electric Company
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION OF ALJ ALLEN ALLOCATING THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES NATURAL GAS CONTRACT.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
September 12, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ALLEN/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Opening Comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due no later than Oct 2, 2006; Reply Comments are due 5 days thereafter.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on the draft decision of ALJ Allen.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
|
|
Description:
to the draft decision granting petition for modification of D03-10-040.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN JOSE
|
|
Description:
and Objections to Draft Decision Granting PG&E's Petition for Modification of D03-10-040.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ALLEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion Granting Petition for Modification of D03-10-040. Comments are due April 17, 2006, reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ALLEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Regarding Applications for Rehearing. Applications for Rehearing of D05-12-010 are due by December 19, 2005; responses to applications for rehearing - January 3, 2006.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On December 2, 2005, Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Jacobson discussed the proposed decision of ALJ Allen regarding the allocation of the Department of Water Resources' 2006 Revenue Requirement Determination. Jacobson stated that PG&E supports ALJ Allen's initial determination that the net benefits of the Williams Gas contract should be shared equitably between the three utilities according to the fixed allocation percentages adopted in D05-06-060. Jacobson explained that the Williams Gas contract was comparable to a cash settlement. Jacobson also indicated that there was a calculation error in the original draft decision that should be corrected.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On November 28, 2005, October 18, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Jacobson discussed the proposed decision (PD) of ALJ Allen regarding the allocation of the Department of Water Resources' 2006 Revenue Requirement Determination. Jacobson stated that PG&E supports ALJ Allen's determination that the net benefits of the Williams Gas contract should be shared equitably between the three utilities according to the fixed allocation percentages adopted in D05-06-060. Jacobson also indicated that there was a calculation error in the PD that should be corrected.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On November 28, 2005, Colin E. Cushnie, Director of Regulatory Affairs of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, and Peter Arth, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in three separate meetings. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cushnie discussed ALJ Brown's draft decision (DD) on the Department of Water Resources (DWR) Contract Reallocation and ALJ Allen's DD on the Allocation of DWR's 2006 Revenue Requirement Determination. Cushnie requested that the Commission adopt ALJ Brown¿s DD reallocating the Williams Product 'D' contract to SCE's customers. Cushnie also requested that the ALJ Allen's DD be modified to reject Pacific Gas and Electric Company's proposal to calculate the mark-to-market benefits of the Williams gas supply contract and allocate the benefits to all utility customers.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 28, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on Draft Decision of ALJ Allen allocating the 2006 DWR Revenue Requirements and Denying Petition to Modify.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 28, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Draft Decision allocating the 2006 Revenue Requirement Determination of California DWR and denying Petition to Modify.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 28, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Draft Decision of ALJ Allen
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On November 18, 2005, Colin E. Cushnie, Director of Regulatory Affairs of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cushnie discussed ALJ Brown's draft decision (DD) on the Department of Water Resources (DWR) Contract Reallocation and ALJ Allen's DD on the Allocation of DWR's 2006 Revenue Requirement Determination. Cushnie requested that the Commission adopt ALJ Brown's DD reallocating the Williams Product 'D' contract to SCE's customers. Cushnie also requested that the ALJ Allen's DD be modified to reject Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) proposal to calculate the mark-to-market benefits of the Williams gas supply contract and allocate the benefits to all utility customers. Additionally, Cushnie requested that the DD be modified to adopt SCE's Petition to Modify D05-06-060, which would levelize shift in cost responsibility from San Diego Gas & Electric Company's customers to
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
opening; on Draft Decision of ALJ Allen allocating the 2006 DWR Revenue Requirements and Denying the Petition to Modify.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ Allen allocating the 2006 DWR Revenue Requirements and Denying the Petition to Modify.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ Allen allocating the 2006 DWR Revenue Requirements and Denying the Petition to Modify.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On November 16, 2005, Colin E. Cushnie, Director of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), spoke on the telephone with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cushnie requested that the Commission adopt ALJ Brown's draft decision reallocating the Williams Product 'D' contract to SCE's customers. Cushnie also requested that ALJ Allen's draft decision be modified to reject Pacific Gas and Electric Company's proposal to calculate the mark-to-market benefits of the Williams gas supply contract and allocate the benefits to all utility customers.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ALLEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Allocating the 2006 Revenue Requirement Determination of the California Department of Water Resources and Denying Petition to Modify. Comments are due November 22, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Allocation of 2006 DWR Revenue Requirement.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on issues identified at 09/29/05 PHC.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to responses to Petition for Modification of D03-10-040.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SAN JOSE
|
|
Description:
to PG&E's Petition for Modification of Decision 03-10-040; Declaration of Andy Heath in support thereof.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to PG&E Petition for Modification of Decision 03-10-040.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
CITY OF SUNNYVALE
|
|
Description:
to PG&E's Petition for Modification of Decision 03-10-040.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants PG&E's Motion for Relief From Ordering Paragraph 2.a. of D01-03-029, filed on August 2, 2005. PG&E's December 20, 2001 motion to end the reporting requirement is moot.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
and protest to the petition to modify of the joint parties.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Petition for Modification of Decision 05-06-060.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to and Joinder in PG&E Motion for Relief from O.P. 2.A of Decision 01-03-029 requiring Monthly Update Regarding Cash Conservation Program Status Reports.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ALLEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Shortens the time to respond to the Edison et al.'s Petition to Modify D05-06-060, filed on August 1, 2005, to August 19, 2005. Sets a prehearing conference for August 31, 2005. Parties shall not submit prehearing conference statements.
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of D03-10-040.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for Relief from O.P.2.A of Decision 01-03-029 requiring Monthly Udate Regarding Cash Conservation Measures.
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of D05-06-060
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
53rd Monthly Report in compliance with D01-03-029.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Udate Regarding Cash Conservation Measures.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Application for Rehearing (of Decision 05-06-060).
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of D05-06-060.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 1.b of D01-03-029]: Monthly Udate Regarding Cash Conservation Measures.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
52nd Monthly Report in compliance with D01-03-029.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On June 15, 2005, Natalie Walsh, Deputy Director of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present were Steve Ross, Analyst, ORA, Colin Cushnie, Director, Regulatory Affairs, Southern California Edison Company, and Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company. ORA noted that the ALJ's proposed decision allocates a fair share of the burden of the Department of Water Resources contracts to each of the investor-owned utilities whereas the alternate decision results in arbitrary allocation of costs that is both unjustified and inequitable.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ALLEN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Regarding Applications for Rehearing of D05-06-060 mailed on June 30, 2005. Any applications for rehearing are due on July 11, 2005; any responses to applications for rehearing are due July 15, 2005.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On June 23, 2005, Bruce C. Foster, Vice President, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present was Colin E. Cushnie, Director, Regulatory Affairs, SCE. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. The written materials were also provided to Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn. SCE discussed ALJ's draft decision (DD) rejecting San Diego Gas & Electric Company's Petition for Modification of D04-12-014 and Cmmr. Peevey's alternate (AD). SCE stated that it supports the DD. SCE highlighted the inequities that would result from the AD.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 15, 2005, Colin E. Cushnie, Director, Regulatory Affairs, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present were Natalie Walsh and Steven Ross of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates and Brian Cherry of Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cushnie explained that SCE supports ALJ Allen's draft decision. Cushnie also highlighted the inequities that would result from Cmmr. Peevey's alternate.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 14, 2005, Lad Lorenz, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Steve St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Lorenz expressed SDG&E's support for Cmmr. Peevey's alternate as a reasonable and fair permanent allocation of the Department of Water Resources revenue.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 15, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present were Natalie Walsh and Steve Ross of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, and Colin Cushnie, Director, Regulation, for Southern California Edison Company. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cherry discussed the proposed decisions in the Department of Water Resources (DWR) allocation proceeding. Cherry stated that the alternate by Cmmr. Peevey would not merely modify D04-12-014, but would vacate that decision. Cherry stated that San Diego Gas & Electric Company's (SDG&E) flawed rate impact claims do not justify imposing the alternate's inequitable allocation approach, and that the above market cost calculation are far from complex for a utility like SDG&E to perform. Cherry stated that the current allocation allocates a fair share of the burden of the DWR contracts to each of the investor-owned utilities' custome
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 13, 2005, Lad Lorenz, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, at Trader Vic's Restaurant in San Francisco. Lorenz expressed SDG&E's support for Cmmr. Peevey's alternate as a reasonable and fair permanent allocation of the Department of Water Resources contracts. Lorenz pointed out that the current allocation methodology relies on an untested, outdated and volatile forecast of above-market costs.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on Alternate of Cmmr. Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; Draft Decision of Cmmr. Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Joint, Reply; on Proposed Decision of Cmmr. Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Decision of Cmmr Peevey Granting, in Part, Petition for Modification of D04-12-014.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Joint; Proposed Decision of Cmmr Peevey.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to TURN's Application for Rehearing of D05-04-049.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 3, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 1.b of D01-03-029: Monthly Update Re Cash Conservation Measures.
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Order Granting, in Part, Petition for Modification of D04-12-014, on the Permanent Allocation of the Department of Water Resources' Annual Revenue Requirement. Comments are due June 9, 2005, and reply comments - June 13, 2005.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
51st Monthly Report in compliance with D01-03-029.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 23, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, at The Blue Muse in San Francisco. Also present were Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, for PG&E, and Colin Cushnie, Manager, Energy Planning, for Southern California Edison Company. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Jacobson explained that PG&E and the Settling Parties supported ALJ Allen's proposed decision rejecting SDG&E's petition for modification of D04-12-014. Jacobson indicated that the utilities could work together to develop a common approach to estimating above-market costs in response to the limited rehearing granted by the Commission.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 23, 2005, Colin E. Cushnie, Director, Regulatory Affairs, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, at the Blue Muse restaurant in San Francisco. Also present were Brian Cherry, Regulatory Director, and Erik Jacobson, Regulatory Chief, Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cushnie discussed ALJ Allen's draft decision (DD) rejecting San Diego Gas & Electric Company's petition for modification of D04-12-014. Cushnie stated that SCE supports the DD.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
May 25, 2005
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of D05-04-049.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 19, 2005, Lad Lorenz, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Larry Chaset, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, in San Francisco. Also present was Meredith Allen, Senior Counsel for SDG&E. Lorenz discussed the Permanent Cost Allocation of the Department of Water Resources (DWR) contracts. Lorenz described how the current decision unfairly shifts approximately $790 million in costs to SDG&E's customers. Lorenz urged granting SDG&E's petition for modification as an appropriate vehicle to adopt an allocation methodology that would result in a more equitable allocation of all DWR contract costs.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 20, 2005, Lad Lorenz, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Steven St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present was Meredith Allen, Senior Counsel for SDG&E. Lorenz discussed the Permanent Cost Allocation of the Department of Water Resources (DWR) contracts. Lorenz described how the current decision unfairly shifts approximately $790 million in costs to SDG&E's customers. Lorenz urged granting SDG&E's petition for modification as an appropriate vehicle to adopt an allocation methodology that would result in a more equitable allocation of all DWR contract costs.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 18, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Larry Chaset, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, in San Francisco. Also present Colin Cushnie, Manager, Energy Planning, for Southern California Edison Company. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Jacobson explained that PG&E and the Settling Parties supported ALJ Allen's proposed decision rejecting SDG&E's petition for modification of D04-12-014. Jacobson indicated that the limited rehearing granted by the Commission will allow all parties another opportunity to address the above-market cost calculation itself, but not the allocation method.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 100
|
Decision Number:
D0804025
|
Rendered Date:
April 10, 2008
Effective Date:
April 10, 2008
|
|
Description:
Grants, in part, the petition to modify Decision 05-06-060. These proceedings are closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0712037
|
Rendered Date:
December 20, 2007
Effective Date:
December 20, 2007
|
|
Description:
Grants intervenor compensation to The Utility Reform Network for substantial contributions to Decision (D) 02-10-063, D02-11-074, D02-12-045, D03-02-036, D03-09-018, D03-12-015, D04-01-028, D04-01-049, D04-05-054, and D04-12-014 regarding allocation of Department of Water Resources' revenue requirements. These proceedings are closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0703017
|
Rendered Date:
March 1, 2007
Effective Date:
March 1, 2007
|
|
Description:
Modifies Decision 05-04-049 and denies rehearing of the decision as modified.
|
Decision Number:
D0611003
|
Rendered Date:
November 9, 2006
Effective Date:
November 9, 2006
|
|
Description:
Allocates the benefits and costs of a California Department of Water Resources Natural Gas Contract. These proceedings are closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0605005
|
Rendered Date:
May 11, 2006
Effective Date:
May 11, 2006
|
|
Description:
Grants as set forth, Pacific Gas and Electric Company's petition for modification of Decision 03-10-040, filed on August 3, 2005. (Comr. Bohn, being necessarily absent, did not participate.)
|
Decision Number:
D0512010
|
Rendered Date:
December 1, 2005
Effective Date:
December 1, 2005
|
|
Description:
Allocates the 2006 revenue requirement of the California Department of Water Resources, using the allocation methodology adopted in D05-06-060; and denies the petition to modify D05-06-060 filed by Southern California Edison, The Utility Reform Network, and the California Large Energy Consumers Association, including its request to change the allocation of unavoidable gas hedging costs and benefits.
|
Decision Number:
D0507047
|
Rendered Date:
July 21, 2005
Effective Date:
July 21, 2005
|
|
Description:
Rehearing of D05-06-060, as modified, is denied.
|
Decision Number:
D0506060
|
Rendered Date:
June 30, 2005
Effective Date:
June 30, 2005
|
|
Description:
Grants, in part, Petition for Modification of D04-12-014, on the permanent allocation of the Department of Water Resources' Annual Revenue Requirement. D04-12-014 is vacated and replaced with this decision. D05-01-036 is vacated. (Comr. Brown dissents. Comr. Bohn, being necessarily absent, did not participate.)
|
Decision Number:
D0504049
|
Rendered Date:
April 21, 2005
Effective Date:
April 21, 2005
|
|
Description:
Awards TURN $389,119.68 in compensation for its substantial contributions to D99-10-057, D00-03-058, D01-03-082, D02-06-070, and D03-04-034; but denies TURN compensation for its judicial litigation costs of challenging the Commission's settlement in resolution of the Edison federal district court proceeding.
|
Decision Number:
D0504025
|
Rendered Date:
April 7, 2005
Effective Date:
April 7, 2005
|
|
Description:
Allocates the revised 2005 revenue requirement determination of DWR, as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0503024
|
Rendered Date:
March 17, 2005
Effective Date:
March 17, 2005
|
|
Description:
Allocates the 2005 revenue requirement determination of the DWR.
|
Decision Number:
D0502024
|
Rendered Date:
February 10, 2005
Effective Date:
February 10, 2005
|
|
Description:
Denies rehearing of D05-01-036. (Comr. Grueneich recused herself from this agenda item and was not part of the quorum in its consideration.)
|
Decision Number:
D0501036
|
Rendered Date:
January 13, 2005
Effective Date:
January 13, 2005
|
|
Description:
D04-12-014 is vacated and replaced with this decision. D05-01-036 is vacated. Grants limited rehearing of D04-12-014.
|
Decision Number:
D0412014
|
Rendered Date:
December 2, 2004
Effective Date:
December 2, 2004
|
|
Description:
D04-12-014 is vacated and replaced with this decision. D05-01-036 is vacated. Implements a permanent allocation of the annual revenue requirement determination of DWR, as set forth. (Pres. Peevey dissents. Comr. Kennedy dissents.)
|
Decision Number:
D0408050
|
Rendered Date:
August 19, 2004
Effective Date:
August 19, 2004
|
|
Description:
Adopts an interim cost allocation of the supplemental revenue requirement of DWR for its power purchases in 2004. (Comr. Lynch will file a concurrence.)
|
Decision Number:
D0405054
|
Rendered Date:
May 27, 2004
Effective Date:
May 27, 2004
|
|
Description:
Denies petition to modify D04-01-028. (Comr. Wood and Comr. Lynch reserve the right to file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0402065
|
Rendered Date:
February 26, 2004
Effective Date:
February 26, 2004
|
|
Description:
PG&E's application for rehearing of D04-01-049 is denied.
|
Decision Number:
D0402028
|
Rendered Date:
February 11, 2004
Effective Date:
February 11, 2004
|
|
Description:
Modifies D04-01-028 and denies rehearing of D04-01-028, as modified. (Comr. Lynch and Comr. Wood dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0401049
|
Rendered Date:
January 22, 2004
Effective Date:
January 22, 2004
|
|
Description:
Approves an interest amount of $38 million that should be paid by shareholders of PG&E in connection with the under-remittance that was owed to the California Department of Water Resources.
|
Decision Number:
D0401026
|
Rendered Date:
January 8, 2004
Effective Date:
January 8, 2004
|
|
Description:
This opinion regarding end of rate control period and valuation of generation-related assets, closes the portion of this proceeding that deals with the rehearing granted by D02-01-001. (Comr. Wood and Comr. Lynch reserve the right to file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0401028
|
Rendered Date:
January 8, 2004
Effective Date:
January 8, 2004
|
|
Description:
Implements an interim allocation of the 2004 revenue requirement determination of the California Department of Water Resources and truing up the 2001-2002 revenue requirement determination of the California Department of Water Resources. (Comr. Wood dissents and Comr. Lynch reserves the right to file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0312041
|
Rendered Date:
December 18, 2003
Effective Date:
December 18, 2003
|
|
Description:
Dismisses consideration of TURN intervener compensation claim.
|
Decision Number:
D0312015
|
Rendered Date:
December 4, 2003
Effective Date:
December 4, 2003
|
|
Description:
Addresses the expanded registration and re-application requirements of electric service providers as mandated by Assembly Bill 117. (Comrs. Wood and Lynch dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0310040
|
Rendered Date:
October 16, 2003
Effective Date:
October 16, 2003
|
|
Description:
Resolves issues regarding the collection and remittance of municipal surcharge fees in connection with electric power sales of the DWR pursuant to AB 1 of AB1X.
|
Decision Number:
D0310023
|
Rendered Date:
October 2, 2003
Effective Date:
October 2, 2003
|
|
Description:
Denies PG&E's Application for Rehearing of D03-09-017.
|
Decision Number:
D0309018
|
Rendered Date:
September 4, 2003
Effective Date:
September 4, 2003
|
|
Description:
Allocates a $1.002 billion reduction in the 2003 revenue requirement of the California Department of Water Resources, and returns the money to ratepayers via a one-time bill credit as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0309017
|
Rendered Date:
September 4, 2003
Effective Date:
September 4, 2003
|
|
Description:
Applications for Rehearing due 9/15/03 - directs PG&E to remit to DWR the Commission-approved charge for all of the energy that DWR supplied to meet PG&E'S retail load, etc. Grants DWR's request to modify D02-05-048 and D02-12-072 as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0304066
|
Rendered Date:
April 23, 2003
Effective Date:
April 23, 2003
|
|
Description:
Corrects error in D03-04-011. $228,264.82 should replace $228,897.32 throughout the decision as the compensation awarded to TURN.
|
Decision Number:
D0304034
|
Rendered Date:
April 3, 2003
Effective Date:
April 3, 2003
|
|
Description:
Modifies D02-06-070 and denying rehearing of D02-06-070 as modified.
|
Decision Number:
D0304011
|
Rendered Date:
April 3, 2003
Effective Date:
April 3, 2003
|
|
Description:
Awards TURN $228,897.32 in compensation for its substantial contribution to D01-03-081, D01-04-005, D01-10-067, D02-02-051, D02-02-052, D02-03-058, D02-03-062 and D02-04-016 as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0302031
|
Rendered Date:
February 13, 2003
Effective Date:
February 13, 2003
|
|
Description:
Amends D02-12-045, as amended by D02-12-052, to restore the subject $29 million to the 2003 revenue requirement of DWR, and to read as shown in Attachment A. (Com. Lynch will file a dissent. Com. Wood dissents.)
|
Decision Number:
D0302036
|
Rendered Date:
February 13, 2003
Effective Date:
February 13, 2003
|
|
Description:
Denies the application of TURN for rehearing of D02-12-082. (Com. Lynch and Com. Wood will file a dissent.)
|
Decision Number:
D0302032
|
Rendered Date:
February 13, 2003
Effective Date:
February 13, 2003
|
|
Description:
Grants request of PG&E for a workshop to address proper remittances of surcharges to municipalities. PG&E shall file and serve a proposed workshop agenda by 3/5/03.
|
Decision Number:
D0301085
|
Rendered Date:
January 30, 2003
Effective Date:
January 30, 2003
|
|
Description:
Denies application of PG&E for rehearing of D02-12-072.
|
Decision Number:
D0212082
|
Rendered Date:
December 30, 2002
Effective Date:
December 30, 2002
|
|
Description:
Grants rehearing of D02-11-074 as set forth. (Pres Lynch and Com Wood dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0212072
|
Rendered Date:
December 19, 2002
Effective Date:
December 19, 2002
|
|
Description:
Approves the 2003 servicing order concerning PG&E and CDWR, as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0212044
|
Rendered Date:
December 17, 2002
Effective Date:
December 17, 2002
|
|
Description:
Denies the petition of Greenlining/Latino Issues Forum to modify D02-09-003.
|
Decision Number:
D0212052
|
Rendered Date:
December 17, 2002
Effective Date:
December 17, 2002
|
|
Description:
Corrects errors in D02-12-045 and tables.
|
Decision Number:
D0212045
|
Rendered Date:
December 17, 2002
Effective Date:
December 17, 2002
|
|
Description:
Adopts interim allocation of the 2003 revenue requirements of the California Department of Water Resources among the customers of PG&E, SDG&E and Edison.
|
Decision Number:
D0211074
|
Rendered Date:
November 21, 2002
Effective Date:
November 21, 2002
|
|
Description:
Modifies D02-10-063 to exempt all residential sales of up to 130% of baseline usage from bond charge. Modified Attachment A replaces the entire text of D02-10-063. (Com Brown absent, Com Peevey dissents).
|
Decision Number:
D0211036
|
Rendered Date:
November 14, 2002
Effective Date:
November 14, 2002
|
|
Description:
Corrects error in D02-10-067 as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0211026
|
Rendered Date:
November 7, 2002
Effective Date:
November 7, 2002
|
|
Description:
Modifies D01-03-082 as shown in Attachment A. The rehearing of D01-03-082 ordered by D02-01-001 remains open.
|
Decision Number:
D0210067
|
Rendered Date:
October 24, 2002
Effective Date:
October 24, 2002
|
|
Description:
Denies rehearing of D02-04-016.
|
Decision Number:
D0210063
|
Rendered Date:
October 24, 2002
Effective Date:
October 24, 2002
|
|
Description:
Adopts methodology for setting charges to recover bond-related costs incurred by the Department of Water Resources. (Pres Lynch will file a dissent; Com Wood reserves the right to file a dissent.)
NOTE: Attachment A of D02-11-074 dated 11/21/02 replaces the entire text of D02-10-063.
|
Decision Number:
D0210035
|
Rendered Date:
October 17, 2002
Effective Date:
October 17, 2002
|
|
Description:
Modifies D02-09-045 and denies the application for rehearing of D02-09-045 as modified.
|
Decision Number:
D0209045
|
Rendered Date:
September 19, 2002
Effective Date:
September 19, 2002
|
|
Description:
Clarifies D02-02-052 as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0209023
|
Rendered Date:
September 5, 2002
Effective Date:
September 5, 2002
|
|
Description:
Modifies D02-03-058 as set forth and denies rehearing of the decision as modified. (Com Duque absent).
|
Decision Number:
D0209003
|
Rendered Date:
September 5, 2002
Effective Date:
September 5, 2002
|
|
Description:
Awards Greenlining Institute and Latino Issues Forum $221,709.81 in compensation for substantial contribution to D01-01-018 and D01-03-082. (Com Duque absent).
|
Decision Number:
D0207007
|
Rendered Date:
July 15, 2002
Effective Date:
July 15, 2002
|
|
Description:
Corrects errors in D02-06-070.
|
Decision Number:
D0206051
|
Rendered Date:
June 27, 2002
Effective Date:
June 27, 2002
|
|
Description:
Grants the 10/1/01 motion of Pacific Gas and Electric Company in compliance with D01-09-015, Ordering Paragraph 10.
|
Decision Number:
D0206056
|
Rendered Date:
June 27, 2002
Effective Date:
June 27, 2002
|
|
Description:
Awards Aglet Consumer Alliance $47,718.94 for its contribution to D02-04-016.
|
Decision Number:
D0206066
|
Rendered Date:
June 27, 2002
Effective Date:
June 27, 2002
|
|
Description:
Awards Aglet Consumer Alliance $34,242.33 in compensation for its contribution to D02-02-052.
|
Decision Number:
D0206070
|
Rendered Date:
June 27, 2002
Effective Date:
June 27, 2002
|
|
Description:
Awards TURN $573,335.70 for its contribution to D01-01-018, D01-03-029. D01-03-081, D01-03-082, D01-04-005, and D01-05-064, as set forth. (Com Duque dissented).
|
Decision Number:
D0206014
|
Rendered Date:
June 6, 2002
Effective Date:
June 6, 2002
|
|
Description:
Awards Golden State Power Cooperative $17,019.54 in compensation for contributions to applicatiions leading to OII01-04-002.
|
Decision Number:
D0206028
|
Rendered Date:
June 6, 2002
Effective Date:
June 6, 2002
|
|
Description:
Modifies D02-05-048 and denies PG&E's application for rehearing of D02-05-048 as modified.
|
Decision Number:
D0205048
|
Rendered Date:
May 16, 2002
Effective Date:
May 16, 2002
|
|
Description:
Approves the Servicing Order attached hereto as Appendix B, and Appendix C as set forth. (Com Peevey abstained).
|
Decision Number:
D0205024
|
Rendered Date:
May 13, 2002
Effective Date:
May 13, 2002
|
|
Description:
Corrects Appendix A of D02-02-051 as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0204069
|
Rendered Date:
April 22, 2002
Effective Date:
April 22, 2002
|
|
Description:
Corrects an error of omission in D02-03-058.
|
Decision Number:
D0204016
|
Rendered Date:
April 4, 2002
Effective Date:
April 4, 2002
|
|
Description:
Establishes interim cost-of-service revenue requirements for the utility retained generation of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Edison and San Diego Gas and Electric Company, as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0203065
|
Rendered Date:
March 28, 2002
Effective Date:
March 28, 2002
|
|
Description:
Corrects error in D02-03-062. In Ordering Paragraph 1z, on page 36, the revenue responsibility for SCE, in dollars, is corrected from $3,495,257,000 to $3,459,257,000
|
Decision Number:
D0203062
|
Rendered Date:
March 21, 2002
Effective Date:
March 21, 2002
|
|
Description:
Modifies D02-02-052 and D02-03-003, and denies rehearing of these decisions, as modified. (Comr Duque will file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0203058
|
Rendered Date:
March 21, 2002
Effective Date:
March 21, 2002
|
|
Description:
Establishes cost- of-service revenue requirements related to the Independent System Operator and provision of ancillary services for Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0203063
|
Rendered Date:
March 21, 2002
Effective Date:
March 21, 2002
|
|
Description:
Modifies D02-02-051, and denies the application filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company for rehearing of D02-02-051, as modified.
|
Decision Number:
D0203003
|
Rendered Date:
March 1, 2002
Effective Date:
March 1, 2002
|
|
Description:
Corrects error in D02-02-052.
|
Decision Number:
D0202037
|
Rendered Date:
February 21, 2002
Effective Date:
February 21, 2002
|
|
Description:
Awards Aglet Consumer Alliance $22,593.61 in compensation for its contribution to D01-01-018.
|
Decision Number:
D0202051
|
Rendered Date:
February 21, 2002
Effective Date:
February 21, 2002
|
|
Description:
Adopts a rate agreement between the Commission and the California Department of Water Resources as set forth. (Cmr Duque will file a dissent. Cmr Bilas will file a concurrence).
|
Decision Number:
D0202052
|
Rendered Date:
February 21, 2002
Effective Date:
February 21, 2002
|
|
Description:
Implements the revenue requirement of the California Department of Water in the amount of $9,045,462,000 as set forth in Appendix A; Implements measures to allocate and collect $10.003 billion in revenue requirements of the California Department of Water Resources covering the 2001-2002 period as prescribed under Assembly Bill 1X. (Cmr Bilas dissents, Cmr Duque will file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0202029
|
Rendered Date:
February 7, 2002
Effective Date:
February 7, 2002
|
|
Description:
Denies the application for rehearing of D01-10-067 filed by Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
|
Decision Number:
D0201001
|
Rendered Date:
January 2, 2002
Effective Date:
January 2, 2002
|
|
Description:
Modifies D01-03-082 as set forth. Grants limited rehearing on the issue of whether rate controls under AB 1890 should be ended. Denies rehearing on all remaining issues in the applications for rehearing of D01-03-082 filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, The Utility Reform Network and Leprino Foods Company, as modified herein. (Com Duque dissented).
|
Decision Number:
D0112004
|
Rendered Date:
December 7, 2001
Effective Date:
December 7, 2001
|
|
Description:
Corrects clerical error in D01-11-032.
|
Decision Number:
D0111047
|
Rendered Date:
November 29, 2001
Effective Date:
November 29, 2001
|
|
Description:
Awards Aglet Consumer Alliance $100,147.63 in compensation for its contribution to D01-03-081, D01-03-082, D01-04-005, and D01-05-064.
|
Decision Number:
D0110069
|
Rendered Date:
October 25, 2001
Effective Date:
October 25, 2001
|
|
Description:
Grants California Cogeneration Council's motion for leave to late file its supplemental comments to the Independent Energy Producers Assn's petition for modification of D01-06-015. Denies Southern California Edison's petition for modification of D01-09-021. Modifies D01-09-021 as set forth. (Com Bilas dissented; Com Duque will file a dissent)
|
Decision Number:
D0110067
|
Rendered Date:
October 25, 2001
Effective Date:
October 25, 2001
|
|
Description:
Denies Pacific Gas & Electric's proposal to market value its hydroelectric generation assets prior to establishing a utility retained generation (URG) revenue requirement. Denies PG&E'S proposal to include in its prospective URG revenue requirement past uneconomic costs or costs not recovered during the rate freeze, including unrecovered costs in the Transition Cost Balancing Account. (Com Duque will file a concurrence).
|
Decision Number:
D0110034
|
Rendered Date:
October 10, 2001
Effective Date:
October 10, 2001
|
|
Description:
Denies PG&E's application for rehearing of D01-09-015. (Com Duque dissented).
|
Decision Number:
D0110032
|
Rendered Date:
October 10, 2001
Effective Date:
October 10, 2001
|
|
Description:
Modifies D01-07-033 and denies rehearing of D01-07-033 as modified.
|
Decision Number:
D0109062
|
Rendered Date:
September 20, 2001
Effective Date:
September 20, 2001
|
|
Description:
Modifies the language adopted in D01-08-021 as set forth. The default Time Of Use proposals of Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Edison, as modified, are effective today.
|
Decision Number:
D0109065
|
Rendered Date:
September 20, 2001
Effective Date:
September 20, 2001
|
|
Description:
Grants PG&E's application for rehearing of D01-03-009. D01-03-009 is vacated.
|
Decision Number:
D0109015
|
Rendered Date:
September 6, 2001
Effective Date:
September 6, 2001
|
|
Description:
Orders PG&E to provide the services requested by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in its letter dated June 27, 2001 on the terms and conditions set forth in Appendix
|
Decision Number:
D0109021
|
Rendered Date:
September 6, 2001
Effective Date:
September 6, 2001
|
|
Description:
Grants the petition of Independent Energy Producers Assn for modification of D01-06-015 as set forth..
|
Decision Number:
D0109025
|
Rendered Date:
September 6, 2001
Effective Date:
September 6, 2001
|
|
Description:
Grants the Applications for Rehearing of D01-03-082, filed by PG&E, The Utility Reform Network, Leprino Foods Company, and Southern California Edison Company on the issues of the federal generation-based tariff and the rate increase caps for industrial customers. Except for the above, rehearing of D01-03-082 as modified is denied.
|
Decision Number:
D0108021
|
Rendered Date:
August 2, 2001
Effective Date:
August 2, 2001
|
|
Description:
Grants, in part, the California Energy Commission?s (CEC) May 17, 2001 petition to modify D01-05-064 in regards to real time pricing issues. Denies the pro-forma tariff proposed by the CEC in its June 21, 2001 petition to modify D01-05-064. Cmmr. Bilas filed a concurrence.
|
Decision Number:
D0108024
|
Rendered Date:
August 2, 2001
Effective Date:
August 2, 2001
|
|
Description:
Denies applications for rehearing of decision D01-03-081, as modified, filed on April 30, 2001 by Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company.
|
Decision Number:
D0107033
|
Rendered Date:
July 12, 2001
Effective Date:
July 12, 2001
|
|
Description:
Denies the rehearing applications filed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company and SCE of decision D01-01-046. Cmmr. Duque filed a dissent.
|
Decision Number:
D0106040
|
Rendered Date:
June 14, 2001
Effective Date:
June 14, 2001
|
|
Description:
Modifies D01-05-064 to remove the |