|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 22
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to ORA's Application for Rehearing of Decision 03-08-062.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
of Decision 03-08-062.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on alternate of Cmmr. Kennedy.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Kennedy.
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
CMMR/KENNEDY/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the draft decision of ALJ McKenzie. Comments are due by August 14, 2003; reply comments - by August 18, 2003.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
On July 24, 2003, Robert M. Pocta, Manager, Officer of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Kennedy in San Francisco. Also present were Brian A. Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Marion Peleo, Counsel, and Jonathan P. Tom, Regulatory Analyst, for ORA. ORA representatives stated its support of the draft decision (DD) of ALJ McKenzie. ORA stated that the DD accurately reflects the record and fairly applies the law and Commission policy. Pocta explained that this case involves the allocation of Administrative and General Expenses and General Plant costs, and stated that Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and ORA supported the multi-factor allocation methodology that was adopted by the Commission. Pocta also stated that the circumstance of different jurisdictions using different allocation methodologies is not unique. Pocta further explained that SCE could have elected to employ a more detailed cost allocation study. The ORA representatives stressed that SCE did not satisfy its burden of p
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
July 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
of Grant of Request for Ex Parte Meeting.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 20, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
On June 17, 2003, Robert M. Pocta, Manager, Officer of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Cmmr. Brown, Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Pres. Peevey, David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Marion Peleo, Counsel, and Jonathan P. Tom, for ORA. Pocta, Peleo and Tom stated ORAs support of the draft decision (DD) of ALJ McKenzie. Pocta stated that the TRRRMA DD accurately reflects the record and fairly applies the law and Commission policy. Pocta explained that this case involves the allocation of Administrative and General Expenses and General Plant costs, and stated that Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and ORA supported the multi-factor allocation methodology that was adopted by the Commission. Pocta also stated that the circumstance of different jurisdictions using different allocation methodologies is not unique. Pocta further explained that SCE could have elected to employ a more detailed cost allocation study. The ORA representatives stressed th
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On June 9, 2003, Bruce Foster, Vice President of Regulatory Operations, Southern California Edison Company (Edison), met with Cmmr. Kennedy. Also present were Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Michael Hoover, Director of Regulatory Affairs, for Edison. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Foster and Hoover stated Edison's concerns about errors in the draft decision of ALJ McKenzie, stranding administrative and general and general and intangible plant costs between two regulatory jurisdictions.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On June 3, 2003, Bruce Foster, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Cmmr. Brown. Also present were David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Michael Hoover, SCEs Director of Regulatory Affairs. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Foster and Hoover stated SCEs concerns about errors in the draft decision of ALJ McKenzie, stranding administrative and general and general and intangible plant costs between two regulatory jurisdictions.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on the draf decision.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 30, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 28, 2003, Bruce Foster, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Pres. Peevey; and on May 29, 2003 - with Cmmr. Wood. Both meetings were held in San Francisco. At the meeting with Pres. Peevey also present were Kevin Coughlan and Julie Fitch, advisors to Pres. Peevey, and with Cmmr. Wood ? Steven A. Weissman and Manuel Ramirez, advisors to Cmmr. Wood. Michael Hoover, SCE's Director of Regulatory Affairs, participated in both meetings. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Foster and Hoover stated SCE's concerns about errors in the draft decision of ALJ McKenzie, stranding administrative and general and general and intangible plant costs between two regulatory jurisdictions.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
[on draft decision]
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On Draft Decision of ALJ Denying Application to Recover Costs Booked In Transmission Revenue Requirement Reclassification Memorandum Account
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
May 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MCKENZIE/PUC
|
|
Description:
initial comments are due by May 26, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after initial comments are filed.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
pursuant to the schedule established by ALJ McKenzie
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on issues raised by the ORA
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 8, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Summary: On June 7, 2001, John Hughes, Project Manager, Regulatory Policy and Affairs, Southern California Edison Company, called ALJ McKenzie. Hughes requested that a prehearing conference be set in the near future.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 16, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to protest
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/PELEO/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the application
|
Type:
RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2001
|
Filed By:
COMR/PUC
|
|
Description:
Resolution ALJ 176-3059; Ratification of preliminary determinations of category adopted
|
Type:
APPLICATION
|
Filing Date:
February 28, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for an Order under Section 701 of the Public Utilities Code Granting to it Authorization to Recover Transmission Revenue Requirement Reclassification Memorandum Account [TRRRMA] Costs
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 3
|
Decision Number:
D0402029
|
Rendered Date:
February 11, 2004
Effective Date:
February 11, 2004
|
|
Description:
Rehearing of D03-08-062 is denied. This proceeding is closed. (Comr. Lynch dissents).
|
Decision Number:
D0310008
|
Rendered Date:
October 2, 2003
Effective Date:
October 2, 2003
|
|
Description:
Closes the proceeding. (Comr. Kennedy, being necessarily absent, did not participate).
|
Decision Number:
D0308062
|
Rendered Date:
August 21, 2003
Effective Date:
August 21, 2003
|
|
Description:
Approves application to recover costs booked in the transmission revenue requirement reclassification memorandum account. (Comr. Lynch dissents).
|