|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
Ratesetting
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 236
(only the most current 100 are displayed)
Display all documents for this proceeding
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
on the Draft Decision awarding Intervenor Compensation to SSRC.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
December 26, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Awarding intervenor compensation to Save Southwest Riverside County in response to second request for compensation. Comments are due by January 15, 2004; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
to ALJ Thomas' inquiry re SSRC's request for compensation.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 2003
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE FOR UTILITY SAFETY AND EDUCATION
|
|
Description:
On October 1, 2003, California Alliance for Utility Safety & Education sent a letter (copy attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Brown. The letter was also addressed to Cmmrs. Peevey, Lynch, Kennedy, and Wood.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 30, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On September 29, 2003, Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), transmitted by facsimile a letter (copy attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Brown, Peevey, Lynch, Wood, and Kennedy.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On August 29, 2003, Osa Armi, attorney for Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), spoke on the telephone to Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown; and, following the telephone conversation, Armi emailed to Peter Hanson copies of SSRC's briefs on the intervenor compensation issues as well as copies of D02-05-005 and D02-11-024. Armi explained that SSRC strongly supports the ALJ's draft decision and is concerned by the fact that Cmmr. Brown deferred the consideration of that decision. Armi explained that SSRC is a true grass-roots organization that has taken on significant debts in order to participate in this proceeding. Armi noted that groups like SSRC will effectively be prohibited from participating in Commission proceedings if they cannot obtain compensation when they make a significant contribution to such proceedings.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On August 25, 2003, a letter (attached to the notice) of Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), was delivered to Cmmr. Brown. Copies of the letter were also addressed to Cmmrs. Peevey, Lynch, Wood, and Kennedy.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
to SDG&E's response to request for award of intervenor compensation in connection with D03-05-038 and D03-06-030.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 2003
|
Filed By:
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS
|
|
Description:
On August 19, 2003, Mark Macarro, The Pechanga Tribal Chairman, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians (Tribe), wrote a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Peevey, Brown, Lynch, Kennedy, and Wood. A copy of the letter was also sent to ALJ Cooke. The letter informed the Commission of the Tribe's strong support of the award of intervenor compensation to Save Southwest Riverside County.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
reply; on the draft decision awarding inervenor compensation.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
in support of the proposed decision of ALJ Cooke awarding intervenor compensation.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the Draft Decision of ALJ Cooke awarding Intervenor Compensation to Save Soithwest Riverside County.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Request for Intervenor Compensation by Save Southwest Riverside County.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Awards Intervenor Compensation to SSRC. Comments are due by August 11, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
for award of intervenor compensation in connection with D03-05-038 and D03-06-030.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
to ALJ Thomas inquiry re SSRC's request for award of Intervenor Compensation.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 2003
|
Filed By:
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON June 4, 2003 AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF June 10, 2003. On June 2, 2003, Holland & Knight LLP, attorneys for the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, mailed a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Peevey, Brown, Kennedy, Lynch, and Wood. A copy of the letter was also mailed to ALJ Cooke. The letter informed the Commission of the Tribes opposition to San Diego Gas & Electric Companys petition for modification.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On June 4, 2003, James Scarff, counsel for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Kennedy in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, Scott Logan, ORA staff analyst, and representatives from San Diego Gas & Electric Company's (SDG&E), the California Independent System Operator (CAISO), Save Southwest Riverside County, the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Development Corporation, Greenpeace, and the Sierra Club. Scarff discussed SDG&E's petition for modification of D02-12-066. Scarff commented that SDG&E should pursue acquiring new local generation in the San Diego area in the context of its current resource procurement. Scarff stated that acquisition of new local generation would serve ratepayers better than the construction of the Valley-Rainbow transmission line. Scarff noted that the reliability event that the CAISO claims justifies the construction of this transmission line was calculated to be a very rare set o
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On June 3, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Cmmr. Kennedy in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. A list of other attendees is attached to the notice. Schavrien stated that SDG&E supports the alternate decision which would order hearings, giving all parties the opportunity to cross-examine evidence. Schavrien noted that the alternate does not reach a conclusion on the question of the need for a Valley-Rainbow-type project, which the Commission may decide contemporaneously with SDG&E's long-term resource plan. Schavrien indicated that additional delays may prevent a transmission project from being completed by the time it is needed.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 2003
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On June 4, 2003, Osa Armi, an attorney for Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), participated in an all-party meeting with Cmmr. Kennedy in San Francisoc. Also present were Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, representatives of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Ron Roberts, a current member of the Temecula City Council, Tilden Kim, an attorney for the City of Temecula, Don Clary, an attorney for the Pechanga Development Corporation, as well as representatives of the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, San Diego Gas & Electric Company's (SDG&E), the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Armi urged the Commission to vote to adopt the ALJ's draft decision denying SDG&E's petition for modification, rather than Cmmr. Peevey's alternate. Clary explained the history of SDG&E's involvement in proceedings before the Bureau of Indian Affairs in order to block the Pechanga's fee to trust application for the Great Oak Ranch. Clary explained that the Great
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 2, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager, and Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, for SDG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Katz stated that SDG&E supports the alternate decision which would order hearings, giving all parties the opportunity to cross-examine evidence. Schavrien noted that the alternate does not reach a conclusion on the question of the need for a Valley-Rainbow-type project, which the Commission may decide contemporaneously with SDG&Es long-term resource plan. Blattner added that additional significant delays could foreclose solutions to San Diego?s reliability deficit.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On June 3, 2003, Osa Armi, attorney for Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), spoke on the telephone with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Armi clarified SSRCs position with regard to the alternate circulated by Pres. Peevey. Armi explained that the alternate would effectively set aside the Commissions December 2002 decision and would re-open the evaluation of whether a project like the Valley-Rainbow line is needed. Armi explained that this would impose considerable burdens on the residents of Southwest Riverside County. Armi explained that although San Diego Gas & Electric Company argues that it could find viable routes for the project, it has not identified any such routes.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 4, 2003
|
Filed By:
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On June 2, 2003, Holland & Knight LLP, attorneys for the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, mailed a letter to Cmmrs. Peevey, Brown, Kennedy, Lynch, and Wood. A copy of the letter was also mailed to ALJ Cooke. The letter informed the Commission of the Tribe's opposition to Sand Diego Gas & Electric Company's petition for modification.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
June 3, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Alternate Draft Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON MAY 23, 2003 AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF JUNE 2, 2003. On May 21, 2003, Marc Mihaly, an attorney for Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were Steven Weissman and Manuel Ramirez, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, and Osa Armi, attorney for SSRC. Mihaly and Armi explained SSRC's position with regard to the petition for modification filed by San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E). Mihaly described the problems that would presented if the Commission were to reopen consideration of the Valley-Rainbow line now, given that none of the original proposed routes remain feasible and the fact that the procurement proceeding is underway.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
May 30, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply; on President Peevey's Alternate Draft Decision on SDG&E's Petition For Modification of D02-12-066.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
May 30, 2003
|
Filed By:
CENTEX HOMES
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
May 30, 2003
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the Alternate Draft Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
May 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On the Alternative Draft Decision of Commr. Peevey Granting SDG&E's Petition For Modification
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
May 29, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Peevey on SDG&E's petition for modification of D02-12-066.
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
May 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the Alternate Draft Decision of President Peevey.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On May 27, 2003, Osa Armi, attorney for Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), spoke on the telephone to Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Armi explained SSRC's position with regard to the alternate by Pres. Peevey. Armi explained that the alternate would effectively set aside the Commission's December 2002 decision and would re-open the evaluation of whether a project like the Valley-Rainbow line is needed. Armi explained that San Diego Gas & Electric Company's arguments in support of its petition for modification are not new and lack merit.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On May 21, 2003, Marc Mihaly, an attorney for Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), met with Cmmr. Wood. Also present were Steven Weissman and Manuel Ramirez, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, and Osa Armi, attorney for SSRC. Mihaly and Armi explained SSRC's position with regard to the petition for modification filed by San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E). Mihaly described the problems that would presented if the Commission were to reopen consideration of the Valley-Rainbow line now, given that none of the original proposed routes remain feasible and the fact that the procurement proceeding is underway.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 22, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 19, 2003, Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco; and on May 20, 2003, Blattner had a follow-up telephone conversation with Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood. Also present were Manuel Ramirez and Steven Weissman, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, and Steve Davis, Senior Vice President, and Steve Nelson, Attorney, for SDG&E. Blattner stated that SDG&E would support an alternate draft decision that orders hearings to allow parties to test new evidence submitted in PFM and orders the Energy Division to continue the environmental assessment process, including a thorough alternatives analysis. Davis stated that additional delays are costly and may foreclose promising alternatives that could ensure a reliable supply of affordable power to SDG&E?s customers. Nelson added that a significant number of viable routes and alternatives were still being considered when the Commission issued its decision.
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
May 20, 2003
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments should be filed by May 27, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 13, 2003, Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), had a telephone conference with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey. Also participating in the teleconference were Pam Nataloni of the Legal Division, Billie Blanchard of the Energy Division, and Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager, Steve Nelson, attorney, Jim Arnone, counsel, Mary Turley, Regulatory Case Administrator, and Jack Bainbridge, Electric Transmission Project Manager, for SDG&E. Blattner stated that an alternate draft decision should order hearings to test new evidence submitted in the PFM and order the Energy Division to continue the environmental assessment process, including a thorough alternatives analysis.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On April 18, 2003, James Scarff, counsel for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Kevin Coughlan,, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Scarff discussed San Diego Gas & Electric Company's (SDG&E) petition for modification of D02-12-066. Scarff stated that the alternatives initially proposed by SDG&E had with one exception been rendered irrelevant due to the acquisition of the Great Oak property in trust by the Pechanga tribe. Scarff noted that the new alternatives discussed in the summary analysis had not yet been subjected to scrutiny by the public or the parties. Scarff also said that the cost data used in the need hearings was now likely to be far too low for any Valley-Rainbow project since the route whose cost was estimated in the economic analyses is now no longer feasible. With regard to the Reliability-Must-Run (RMR) costs, Scarff pointed out that the `evidence' SDG&E presented was nothing more than SDG&E's request to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 30, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President Regulatory Affairs, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), had a telephone conference with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey. Also participating in the teleconference were Pam Nataloni of the Legal Division, Billie Blanchard of the Energy Division, and Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, Steve Nelson, attorney, Jim Arnone, counsel, and Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager, for SDG&E. Schavrien stated that SDG&E's PFM should be granted in order to consider additional evidence, which would be subject to cross-examination by all parties. Schavrien stated that a new application would add approximately 18-30 months to the process in order to consider substantially the same information. Schavrien pointed out that since SDG&E filed the PFM, the utilities have filed short- and long-term resource plans in the Procurement proceeding. Katz noted that SDG&E's long-term plan emphasizes demand reduction and new generation as well as a new transmission conn
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
On April 18, 2003, James Scarff, counsel for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Scarff discussed San Diego Gas & Electric Companys (SDG&E) petition for modification of D02-12-066. Scarff stated that the alternatives initially proposed by SDG&E had with one exception been rendered irrelevant due to the acquisition of the Great Oak property in trust by the Pechanga tribe. Scarff noted that the new alternatives discussed in the summary analysis had not yet been subjected to scrutiny by the public or the parties. Scarff also said that the cost data used in the need hearings was now likely to be far too low for any Valley-Rainbow project since the route whose cost was estimated in the economic analyses is now no longer feasible. With regard to the Reliability-Must-Run (RMR) costs, Scarff pointed out that the evidence SDG&E presented was nothing more than SDG&Es request to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a higher rev
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President Regulatory Affairs, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Leslie Katz, SDG&E Regional Vice President. Schavrien stated that new information filed in the PFM clearly demonstrates that a reliability deficit will materialize by 2004, within the arbitrary five-year planning horizon adopted in D02-12-066. Schavrien argued that the Commission should reopen the proceeding to allow continued examination of the project and evidence.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 2003, James Scarff, counsel for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present was Scott Logan, Analyst for ORA. Scarff and Logan discussed San Diego Gas & Electric Companys (SDG&E) petition for modification of D02-12-066. Scarff stated that the alternatives initially proposed by SDG&E had with one exception been rendered irrelevant due to the acquisition of the Great Oak property in trust by the Pechanga tribe. Scarff noted that the new alternatives discussed in the summary analysis had not yet been subjected to scrutiny by the public or the parties. Scarff also said that the cost data used in the need hearings was now likely to be far too low for any Valley-Rainbow project since the route whose cost was estimated in the economic analyses is now no longer feasible. With regard to the Reliability-Must-Run (RMR) costs, Scarff pointed out that the evidence SDG&E presented was nothing more than SDG&Es request to the Fede
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 16, 2003
|
Filed By:
CENTEX HOMES
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 2003, Darren W. Stroud representing Centex Homes, sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Peevey, Brown, Kennedy, Lynch and Wood.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On April 14, 2003, Osa Armi, an attorney for Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. Copies of the briefs filed by the Community Intervenors in response to the petition for modification and the applications for rehearing were used. Armi explained SSRC's position with regard to the petition for modification filed by San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) and each of the points made in the Community Intervenors' response to SDG&E's petition for modification.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 2003, Save Southwest Riverside County delivered letters (attached to the notice) to the Commissioners.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
to SDG&E's response to SSRC's request for intervenor compensation. Supplemental Declarations of Marc B Mihaly, Osa L. Armi, Janette Schue, and Barbara Wilder in support of SSRC's request for award of intervenor compensation.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the Proposed Decision denying the Petition for Modification of SDG&E.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on draft decision on SDG&E's PM of D02-12-066.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants SDG&E's March 6, 2003 requests for official notice.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On April 4, 2003, Marc Mihaly, an attorney for Save Southwest Riverside County, spoke on the telephone with Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood. Mihaly asked Steven Weissman about the status of the Commission's consideration of the issues raised in the application for rehearing filed by San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) and the Independent System Operator and the petition for modification filed by SDG&E in response to D02-12-066.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 2, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the Draft Decision of the ALJ denying the Petition of SDG&E for Modification of Decision 02-12-066.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 25, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Schavrien stated that new information filed in the PFM clearly demonstrates that a reliability deficit will materialize by 2004, within the arbitrary five-year planning horizon adopted in D02-12-066. Schavrien added that the draft decision would deny SDG&Es due process rights and prevent the Commission from considering relevant new information that would tip the balance in favor of continued examination of the project and evidence in Phase 2.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 25, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmrs. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present was Billy Blattner, SDG&E CPUC Relations Manager. Schavrien stated that new information filed in the PFM clearly demonstrates that a reliability deficit will materialize by 2004, within the arbitrary five-year planning horizon adopted in D02-12-066. Schavrien added that the draft decision would deny SDG&Es due process rights and prevent the Commission from considering relevant new information that would tip the balance in favor of continued examination of the project and evidence in Phase 2.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 26, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Community Intervenors' "Request For Clarification"
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 26, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
To Save Southwest Riverside County's Request For Intervenor Compensation
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
In Opposition to SDG&E's Request For Official Notice Of Documents
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due 4/2, reply comments due 4/7.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
March 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to the responses to its petition for modification of D02-12-066.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
For Official Notice of Documents
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 4, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
grants Save Southwest Riverside County et al.'s requests for official notice filed on February 7 and 24, 2003.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
to the Petition for Modification of SDG&E.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
|
|
Description:
to the Petition for Modification of SDG&E of Decision 02-12-066.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
for clarification
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
For Award of Intervenor Compensation
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
in opposition to SDG&E's Petition For Modification of D02-12-066
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
for official notice of California Energy Commission Final Staff Assessment.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
of availability of the Request for Official Notice of a San Diego County Superior Court Cross-Complaint, filed on February 7, 2003.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
of Availability of Request for Award of Intervenor Compensation
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
To Community Intervenor's Request For Official Notice of Document
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
of Community Intervenors to applications for rehearing of SDG&E and ISO of D02-12-066.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
in opposition to the applications for rehearing of D02-12-066 filed by the California ISO and SDG&E
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to application for rehearing of D02-12-066.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
for official notice of San Diego County Superior Court cross-complaint
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2003
|
Filed By:
CENTEX HOMES
|
|
Description:
to SDG&E and ISO's applications for rehearing of D02-12-066.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 2003
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
|
|
Description:
of Decision 02-12-066.
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Decision 02-12-066.
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 2003
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Decision 02-12-066.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On December 19, 2002, a letter (attached to the notice) of Marc B. Mihaly of Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP, attorneys for Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), was delivered to Pres. Lynch and each Member of the Commission.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
On December 16, 2002, Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager of Sempra Utilities (SEU), had a telephone communication on behalf of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), with Laura Krannawitter, advisor to Cmmr. Duque. Blattner stated that although routing issues will be considered in Phase 2 of the proceeding, SDG&E believes that language expressing the Commissions concerns about the feasibility of certain routes may be appropriately inserted into the Phase 1 need decision. Blattner noted that, as stated publicly, SDG&E does not intend to initiate condemnation proceedings prior to a Commission route determination but retains its rights under the law.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 17, 2002
|
Filed By:
CENTEX HOMES, INC.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On December 11, 2002, Darren W. Stroud, attorney for Centex Homes, Inc. (Centex), participated in an all-party meeting with Cmmr. Brown in San Francisco. Also present were Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, other Commissioner advisors and Commission Staff, representatives from the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Save Southwest Riverside County, the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), the California Independent System Operator, Sierra Club, and Greenpeace. Stroud explained that there are several items pending that support the Commission finding that there is no need for the Valley Rainbow Project (Project) now. Stroud also noted that separate pending federal legislation may provide a transmission line route for the Project through he Cleveland National Forest. Stroud emphasized that such a transmission line route would be almost entirely on public lands and would avoid the devastating impacts to private property owners t
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 17, 2002
|
Filed By:
CENTEX HOMES, INC.
|
|
Description:
On December 16, 2002, Darren W. Stroud, attorney for Centex Homes, Inc. (Centex), sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Lynch, Brown, Duque, Peevey and Wood.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
On December 11, 2002, Osa Amri, an attorney for the Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), met with Cmmr. Brown in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, representatives of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Tilden Kim, an attorney for the City of Temecula, James Kawahara, an attorney for the Pechanga Development Corporation, Wayne Schmus, the Community Intervenors' expert transmission consultant, representatives from the Centex Homes, Sierra Club, Greenpeace, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), and the California Independent System Operator. Armi urged the Commission to adopt the ALJ?s proposed decision (PD). Armi argued that in light of SDG&E's failure to prove its case, the Commission should not proceed to Phase 2, as that phase would impose considerable hardship on the residents of southwestern Riverside County. Armi noted that Cmmr. Duque's alternate not only applies the inherently conservative N-1/G-1 reliability criterion, but also as
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
On December 11, 2002, Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager of Sempra Utilities (SEU), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Steve Nelson, Attorney, Sempra Energy, and Judy Peck, SEU CPUC Relations Manager. Blattner stated that San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) supports Cmmr. Duque's alternate, which would enable the Commission to study routes, environmental impacts and project alternatives in Phase 2 of the proceeding. Blattner explained that any new generation in San Diego will displace older inefficient generation which cannot compete to serve base load, resulting in plant shut downs or costly reliability must-run (RMR) condition to contracts. Nelson pointed out that additional increases in SDG&E's RMR costs could exceed the carrying cost of Valley-Rainbow Interconnect (VRI). Nelson emphasized that if the Commission closes the proceeding, they will have done nothing to address the electric reliability deficit in San Diego. Nelson illustrated the
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 11, 2002, James Scarff, counsel for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), attended an all-party meeting with Cmmr. Brown in San Francisco. Also present were Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Michael Yeo, project coordinator, and Scott Logan, analyst, for ORA, representatives of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), the Community Intervenors, the California Independent System Operator (ISO), the Pechanga Tribe, and Centex Homes, Greenpeace and the Sierra Club. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Scarff explained that if the Commission adopted ALJ's proposed decision, it would not create significant administrative. Scarff noted that the cost estimates developed in the record by SDG&E were too low and that without a reliable understanding of the project costs, the Commission is not in a position to evaluate properly the feasibility and desirability of alternatives. Scarff further discussed the Commission's current generation p
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
On December 11, 2002, Jim Avery, Senior Vice President of Sempra Utilities (SEU), met with Cmmr. Brown in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were Belinda Gatti and Peter Hanson, advisors to Cmmr. Brown, Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Steve Nelson, Attorney, Sempra Energy, and Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager, and Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, for SEU. A list of other attendees was maintained by Cmmr. Brown's office. Katz stated that San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) supports Cmmr. Duque's alternate, which would enable the Commission to study routes, environmental impacts and project alternatives in Phase 2 of the proceeding. Katz argued that the proposed decision would risk blackouts by essentially killing the Valley-Rainbow Interconnect (VRI). Avery explained that generation is not a substitute for transmission and described recent generator status changes in San Diego that result in substantially increased costs and the electricity reliability deficit oc
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
On December 4, 2002, Steve Davis, senior Vice President of Sempra Utilities (SEU) Customer Service & External Relations, met, on behalf of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Steve Nelson, Attorney, Sempra Energy, Dave Korinek, Transmission Planning Manager, and Jack Bainbridge, Valley Rainbow Project Manager, for SDG&E, and Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager, for SEU. Davis stated that SDG&E supports Cmmr. Duque's alternate, which would enable the Commission to study routes, environmental impacts and project alternatives in Phase 2 of the proceeding. Davis stated that the proposed decision (PD) would risk blackouts by essentially killing the Valley-Rainbow Interconnect (VRI). Davis described the broad support for VRI. Davis agreed with the conclusion in the alternate that the proposed Otay Mesa plant is far from certain. Blattner explained that the five year planning horizon utilized in both the PD
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 2002
|
Filed By:
CENTEX HOMES, INC.
|
|
Description:
On December 4, 2002, Darren W. Stroud, attorney for Centex Homes, Inc. (Centex), sent by electronic mail a letter (attached to the notice) of David L. Hahn, President of the Inland Empire Division, to Cmmrs. Lynch, Brown, Duque, Peevey and Wood.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 2002
|
Filed By:
SEMPRA ENERGY UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
On November 30, 2002, Jim Avery, Senior Vice President, Transmission, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were Manuel Ramirez, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Steve Nelson, Attorney, Sempra Energy, Dave Korinek, Transmission Planning Manager, and Steve Davis, Customer Service & External Relations Senior Vice President, and Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Manager, for Sempra Energy Utilities. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Davis described the broad support for Valley-Rainbow. Avery stated that SDG&E supports the alternate of Cmmr. Duque and opposes the proposed decision (PD) because the alternate would enable SDG&E to continue to study alternatives, routes and environmental impacts in phase 2. Avery stated that the PD would risk blackouts by essentially killing Valley Rainbow Interconnect (VRI) despite finding an electric reliability deficit by 2008-2009. Avery noted that SDG&E believes the electric reliability deficit actually begins in
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 3, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CITY OF TEMECULA
|
|
Description:
On November 30, 2002, Barbara Wilder, President of Save Southwest Riverside County (SSRC), met with Cmmr. Wood in Temecula, California. Also present were Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Council member, Roberto Ponte, Vintners Association Vice President, and Anton Smeerdyk, PE, member of SSRCs Technical Committee. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Parties described the potential impacts of the Valley-Rainbow Project (Project) on Southwest Riverside County. Parties also gave an overview of the opposition of the Cities of Temecula and Murrieta to the Project and of the impact the Project would have on the area Vintners. Parties also stated the technical concerns associated with the Project.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 2002
|
Filed By:
CENTREX HOMES, INC.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On November 20, 2002, John C. Condas, attorney for Centex Homes, Inc. (Centex), met with Cmmr. Peevey and David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in two separate meetings. At the meeting with Cmmr. Peevey also present was Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey. Darren W. Stroud, attorney for Centex, participated in both meetings. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Condas emphasized that the best approach would be for the Commission to adopt ALJs proposed decision (PD) and if Otay Mesa fails to meet its contractually obligated milestones, other generation projects in the San Diego fail to materialize, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) prevails on its appeal of the Pechangas Great Oak Ranch property trust designation, SDG&E could expeditiously re-initiate its proceeding for the Valley-Rainbow Project (Project). Stroud stated that it was SDG&Es proposed transmission line route for the Project that was a major source of controversy in this pro
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 2002
|
Filed By:
CENTREX HOMES, INC.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On November 19, 2002, John C. Condas, attorney for Centex Homes, Inc. (Centex), met with Cmmr. Wood and Robert Kinosian, advisor to Pres. Lynch, in two separate meetings. At the meeting with Cmmr. Wood also present was Manuel Ramirez, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, and Aaron Johnson, advisor to Pres. Lynch. Darren W. Stroud, attorney for Centex, participated in both meetings. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Condas emphasized that the best approach would be for the Commission to adopt ALJs proposed decision (PD) and if Otay Mesa fails to meet its contractually obligated milestones, other generation projects in the San Diego fail to materialize, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) prevails on its appeal of the Pechangas Great Oak Ranch property trust designation, SDG&E could expeditiously re-initiate its proceeding for the Valley-Rainbow Project (Project). Stroud stated that it was SDG&Es proposed transmission line route for the Project that was
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 27, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Motions to accept additional exhibits, and reply to responses to motion to submit late-filed exhibits
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 2002
|
Filed By:
ENERGY/BLANCHARD/PUC
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
Interim Preliminary; on Alternatives Screening.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 20, 2002
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On November 15, 2002, Jeanne M. Sole, Regulatory Counsel for the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO), met with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey. Also present were Lynne McGhee and Laura Krannawitter, advisors to Cmmr. Duque, Manuel Ramirez, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Aaron Johnson, advisor to Pres. Lynch, and Robin Smutny-Jones, Director of State Affairs, and Jeffrey Miller, Regional Transmission Manager in the Grid Planning Department, for ISO. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Sole stressed that ISO supports the outcome of Cmmr. Duque's alternate because it is important to proceed towards the identification of alternatives and their respective environmental, social and aesthetic impacts to maintain the reliability of the San Diego area. Sole noted that ISO supports some portions of the proposed decision (PD); in particular, the PD's use of the N-1/G-1 reliability criteria. Miller referred to the
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply Comments on ALJ Cooke's Proposed Decision
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply comments on Commr. Duque's Alternate Proposed Decision
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
Reply Comments on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Coorke and the Alternate Proposed Decision of Commr. Duque
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply comments on the Alternate Proposed Decision of Commr. Duque
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SAVE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
|
|
Description:
Response to SDG&E's motion to submit late-filed exhibits
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
in opposition to SDG&E's motion to submit additional late-filed exhibits
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2002
|
Filed By:
ORA/SCARFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
To set aside submission and accept additional exhibits
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 5
|
Decision Number:
D0402026
|
Rendered Date:
February 11, 2004
Effective Date:
February 11, 2004
|
|
Description:
Awards SSRC $43,867.65 in compensation for its substantial contribution to D03-05-038 and D03-06-030. This proceeding is closed. (Comr. Peevey and Comr. Brown dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0310056
|
Rendered Date:
October 16, 2003
Effective Date:
October 16, 2003
|
|
Description:
Awards Save Southwest Riverside County $629,118.90 in compensation for its substantial contribution to D02-12-066. This proceeding is closed. (Pres. Peevey and Comr. Brown dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0306030
|
Rendered Date:
June 5, 2003
Effective Date:
June 5, 2003
|
|
Description:
Denies petition to modify D02-12-066. (Comrs. Peevey and Kennedy dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0305038
|
Rendered Date:
May 8, 2003
Effective Date:
May 8, 2003
|
|
Description:
Denies rehearing of D02-12-066. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0212066
|
Rendered Date:
December 19, 2002
Effective Date:
December 19, 2002
|
|
Description:
Denied without prejudice. This proceeding is closed.
|