|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
Ratesetting
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 26
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 2007
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion closing this proceeding. Opening comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due no later than January 28, 2007. Reply comments are due 5 days after the filing of Opening comments.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
TO WITHDRAW CLAIMS.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
June 25, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
Re Year Seven of the Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism. Comments are due by July 15, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
COM/LYNCH/PUC
|
|
Description:
further revised; by proceeding with the issuance of a draft decision addressing the request of SoCalGas for a year seven gas cost incentive mechanism shareholder award.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 21, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (Sempra), met on behalf of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) with Cmmr. Lynch in San Francisco. Also present were Trina Horner, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, and Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Sempra. Schavrien raised the issue of the revised scoping memo and ruling and explained that they are contrary to the Commissions previous determinations, and they unfairly treat SoCalGas in a different manner than the other utilities. Schavrien noted that any award could be made subject to refund.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 2003, Schavrien raised the issue of the revised scoping memo and ruling and explained that they are contrary to the Commissions previous determinations, and they unfairly treat SoCalGas in a different manner than the other utilities. Schavrien also explained that there is no need for the Commission to violate the SB 960 18-month time limit here, because any award could be made subject to refund.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 24, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (Sempra), met on behalf of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) with Kevin Coughlan, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. At the meeting with Belinda Gatti also present was Billy Blattner, Sempra Regulatory Relations Manager. Schavrien raised the issue of the revised scoping memo and ruling and explained that they are contrary to the Commissions previous determinations, and they unfairly treat SoCalGas in a different manner than the other utilities. Schavrien also explained that there is no need for the Commission to violate the SB 960 18-month time limit here, because any award could be made subject to refund.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 19, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (Sempra), met on behalf of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) with Trina Horner, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, and Laura Krannawitter, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. At the meeting with Laura Krannawitter also present was Lynne McGhee, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy. Judy Peck, Regulatory Relations Manager of Sempra, participated in both meetings. Schavrien raised the issue of the revised scoping memo and ruling and explained that they are contrary to the Commissions previous determinations, and they unfairly treat SoCalGas in a different manner than the other utilities. Schavrien also explained that there is no need for the Commission to violate the SB 960 18-month time limit here, because any award could be made subject to refund.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 2003
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 20, 2003, Lee Schavrien, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Sempra Energy Utilities (Sempra), met on behalf of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Judy Peck, Regulatory Relations Manager of Sempra. Schavrien raised the issue of the revised scoping memo and ruling and explained that they are contrary to the Commissions previous determinations, and they unfairly treat SoCalGas in a different manner than the other utilities. Schavrien also explained that there is no need for the Commission to violate the SB 960 18-month time limit here, because any award could be made subject to refund.
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
CMMR/LYNCH/PUC
|
|
Description:
revised; the need for evidentiary hearing may change depending on what occurs in I02-11-040; the processing of the application is likely to take longer than 18 mos.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/RYERSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
denying motion of Edison to compel SoCalGas to produce discovery
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 16, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
COM/LYNCH/PUC
|
|
Description:
Confirms that category is Ratesetting and designates ALJ Wong as the principal hearing officer. The concerns raised by the protestants will be addressed in I02-11-040.
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 2002
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Pursuant to procedural schedule set by ALJ Wong
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 2002
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Year Seven
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 2002
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
Setting a Prehearing Conference For Year Seven Of The Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism. Prehearing Conference will be held on November 6, 2002; Southern California Gas Company, and other interested parties, may file PHC statements on November 1, 2002.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2002
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Motion of Edison to compel SoCalGas to produce discovery
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 25, 2002
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Motion to compel Southern California Gas Company to produce discovery and for order shortening time to respond
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On November 30, 2001, James Harrigan, Director of Gas Acquisition for Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), met with Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, at 555 W. 5th Street, Los Angeles. Also present were: Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President, Judy Peck and Billy Blattner, CPUC Relations Administrators, Cindy Howell, Government Affairs Manager, and Gillian Wright, Regulatory Case Manager, for Sempra Energy; and Michael Johnson, Manager, California Energy Hub, Patrick Brown, Manager, Gas Supply, for SoCalGas. Written material (attached to the notice) was provided at the meeting. Johnson described general market conditions, gas acquisition activities, transportation and storage of gas. Harrigan provided an overview of how the GCIM functions and explained that the mechanism optimizes assets allocated to the core by reducing the cost of gas.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
Sets a prehearing conference on 10/29/2001.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 30, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Protests and Response to Application.
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
July 19, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GENERATION COALITION
|
|
Description:
to Application.
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
July 19, 2001
|
Filed By:
THE CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL GROUP
THE CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHN.
|
|
Description:
to Application.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 19, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/GILEAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the application of Southern California Gas Company regarding its year seven Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism
|
Type:
RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION
|
Filing Date:
June 28, 2001
|
Filed By:
COMR/PUC
|
|
Description:
Resolution ALJ 176-3066; Ratification of preliminary determinations of category adopted
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 20, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Summary: On June 15, 2001, Jim Harrigan, Director of Gas Acquisition of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), met with Julie Halligan, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, in San Francisco. Also present were Belinda Gatti, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Laura Krannawitter, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, ALJ Steve Weissman, Richard Myers, Joyce Alfton, Eugene Cadenasso, Dorris Lam, Nilgun Atamtruk, and Carlos Velasquez, from the Commission Energy Division, William Scott, Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), Leslie Katz, Regional Vice President of Regulatory Affairs of Sempra Energy, Mike Johnson, California Energy Hub Manager, and Mike Emerson, Energy Risk Manager, for Southern California Gas Company. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Harrigan described gas acquisition?s activities during Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism (GCIM) Year 7 including storage, interstate capacity, physical and financial trading, and risk management. Harrigan stated that SoCalGas had lower gas costs compared to other utilities. Harrigan
|
Type:
APPLICATION
|
Filing Date:
June 15, 2001
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(U-904-G) Regarding Year Seven (2000-2001) Under Its Experimental Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism and Related Gas Supply Matters
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 2
|
Decision Number:
D0702008
|
Rendered Date:
February 15, 2007
Effective Date:
February 15, 2007
|
|
Description:
The September 6, 2006 motion to withdraw claims, filed by Southern California Edison Company, is moot. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0308065
|
Rendered Date:
August 21, 2003
Effective Date:
August 21, 2003
|
|
Description:
Authorizes Southern California Gas Company to adjust the Purchased Gas Account to recognize a shareholder award of $30,826,587 under Year Seven of its Gas Cost Incentive Mechanism, as set forth. (Comr. Lynch dissents).
|