Proceeding A0407018
Date Filed: July 8, 2004
Status: Closed


Documents    Decisions    Main Index

Filer Requested Category: Ratesetting
Preliminary Category: Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category: Ratesetting
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY (U 133-W)

DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 24

Type: EXPARTE

Filing Date: March 15, 2006
Filed By:
DRA/ZELLER/PUC
Description: On March 13, 2006, Jason Zeller, Assistant General Counsel and Counsel of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA), met with met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present were Lindsay Brown, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Chong, and Jasjit Sekhon and Danilo Sanchez of the DRA Water Branch. DRA expressed its support for the ALJ Bushey's proposed decision and its opposition to the alternate decision of Cmmr. Peevey.

Type: EXPARTE

Filing Date: March 15, 2006
Filed By:
DRA/ZELLER/PUC
Description: LATE FILED. On March 10, 2006, Jasjit Sekhon of the Water Branch of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA), met with met with Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present was Danilo Sanchez of the DRA Water Branch. DRA expressed its support for the ALJ Bushey's proposed decision and its opposition to the alternate decision of Cmmr. Peevey.

Type: COMMENTS

Filing Date: March 7, 2006
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
Description: reply; to the DRA's comments regarding the proposed and alternate decisions.

Type: COMMENTS

Filing Date: March 2, 2006
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/PUC
Description: regarding the proposed and the alternate decisions.

Type: PROPOSED DECISION

Filing Date: February 10, 2006
Filed By:
ALJ/BUSHEY/PUC
Description: Opinion Determining Ratemaking Treatment for Prospective Revenues from Sale of Water Rights and Denying Approval Pursuant to Section 851. Comments are due March 2, 2006; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.

Type: ALTERNATE

Filing Date: February 10, 2006
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
Description: Approving Sale Pursuant to Section 851 and Determining Ratemaking Treatment for Prospective Revenues from Sale of Water Rights. Comments are due March 2, 2006; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: November 28, 2005
Filed By:
ORA/LEE/PUC
Description: reply.

Type: SUPPLEMENTAL

Filing Date: November 28, 2005
Filed By:
ORA/LEE/PUC
Description: reply brief.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: November 23, 2005
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY
Description: reply; trial.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: November 4, 2005
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY
Description: Opening; Trial.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: November 2, 2005
Filed By:
ORA/LEE/PUC
Description: opening.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: September 16, 2005
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
Description: Designates the principal hearing officer.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: August 29, 2005
Filed By:
ALJ/BUSHEY/PUC
Description: Sets the following briefing schedule: opening briefs - 10/28/05; reply briefs (proceeding submitted) - 11/23/05.

Type: TRANSCRIPT

Filing Date: June 20, 2005
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
Description: Submitted; Volume 1.

Type: EXPARTE

Filing Date: January 31, 2005
Filed By:
ORA/LEE/PUC
Description: On January 28, 2005, Cleveland Lee, attorney for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Raminder Kahlon, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Jasjit Sekhon and Danilo Sanchez of the ORA. ORA discussed the Commission's allocation to ratepayers of the Folsom lease revenue in D04-03-039. ORA opined that the Commission decision was reasonable, consistent with the law, and in the public's interest. ORA noted that after the Southern California Water Company exhausted their administrative remedies, the company has now taken their appeal to the California Supreme Court.

Type: EXPARTE

Filing Date: November 17, 2004
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY
Description: On November 12, 2004, Floyd Wicks, representing Southern California Water Company (SCWC), met with Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Susan Conway, Denise Kruger, Pat Schmiege and Scott Slater, representing SCWC. SCWC representatives discussed the allocation of the past Folsom lease revenues to ratepayers ordered in D04-03-039. SCWC expressed the view that the allocation ordered in that decision was improper and contrary to Commission precedent and policy. SCWC presented its view that the allocation of past revenues as ordered in D04-03-039 should be reexamined in this proceeding and asked the Commission to consider adding the allocation of past lease revenues as an issue within the scope of this proceeding.

Type: SCOPING RULING

Filing Date: November 2, 2004
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
Description: Confirms that this is a ratesetting proceeding. Sets the following schedule: 4/26-28, 2005 - evidentiary hearing held, as needed; 5/31/05 - opening briefs; 6/20/05 - reply briefs.

Type: OPPOSITION

Filing Date: September 15, 2004
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY
Description: to ORA Motion to Consolidate.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: September 13, 2004
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
Description: Grants the City of Folsom's Petition to Intervene filed August 11, 2004.

Type: RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION

Filing Date: August 19, 2004
Filed By:
COMR/PUC
Description: Resolution ALJ 176-3137; Ratification of preliminary determinations of category adopted.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: August 17, 2004
Filed By:
ORA/LEE/PUC
Description: to consolidate.

Type: PROTEST

Filing Date: August 16, 2004
Filed By:
ORA/LEE/PUC
Description: to Application.

Type: PETITION

Filing Date: August 12, 2004
Filed By:
CITY OF FOLSOM
Description: to Intervene.

Type: APPLICATION

Filing Date: July 8, 2004
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY (U 133-W)
Description: for an Order pursuant to P.U. Code Section 851 approving a Reallocation Agreement with the City of Folsom, as directed by D.04-04-069.

DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 1

Decision Number: D0604038

Rendered Date: April 13, 2006
Effective Date: April 13, 2006
Description: Approves sale pursuant to Section 851 and determines ratemaking treatment for prospective revenues from sale of water rights. This proceeding is closed. (Comr. Brown will file a dissent.)

Top of Page    Documents    Decisions    Main Index