|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Ratesetting
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY (U133W)
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 40
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 2008
|
Filed By:
Golden State Water Company
Water/McCrary/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Joint; to Dismiss Decision 08-01-020 Order to Show Cause why Commission should not fine Golden State Water Company $50,000.
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
February 26, 2008
|
Filed By:
WATER/MCCRARY/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Prehearing conference;
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
February 26, 2008
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Prehearing Conference;
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2008
|
Filed By:
CALJ/MINKIN/CPUC
|
|
Description:
of prehearing conference.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 2007
|
Filed By:
CMMR/BOHN/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Assigned Commissioner's Ruling Attaching Corrected Version of "Opinion Granting Rate Increases for the Region II Service Area and General Office Operations of Golden State Water Company" issued as Decision 07-10-034.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 12, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/CPUC
|
|
Description:
LATE-FILED. SUMMARY: On October 4, 2007 Victor Chan, the Project Manager for the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) had a telephone conversation with Hazlyn Fortune, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich in San Francisco. DRA stated that it supports the Proposed Decision's 10% disallowance of the labor cost for the 19 or more positions requested; and the Alternate's proposal of a $25,000 fine would not effectively deter GSWC, or other Class A water utilities from withholding information until their rebuttal. Contact Person: Sue Muniz, telephone: (415) 703-1858; e-mail: sam@cpuc.ca.gov.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/CPUC
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 20, 2007 Dana Appling of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) met with Cmmr. Bohn in San Francisco. Also present were Laura Krannawitter and Lindsay Brown, advisors to Cmmr. Bohn; Danilo Sanchez, and Cleveland Lee, of DRA. Mehboob Aslam of DRA participated by telephone. DRA stated that GSWC did not provide the justification and data support for the 20 or more positions requested in the General Office except by rebuttal testimony which was 200 or more pages. DRA commented that the Alternate's fine of $25,000 in lieu of the Proposed Decision's (PD) 10% disallowance, would not effectively deter GSWC from similar behavior in future proceedings. DRA further stated that an Order to Show Cause (OSC) and having DRA to file testimony in response to the OSC is unnecessary because the PD already has found the facts of record that support the 10% disallowance and the Alternate's $25,000 fine. DRA urged upholding the PD's 50% allocation between shareholders and the ratepayers of the labor costs as
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 2007
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE-FILED. On August 7, 2007, Cleveland Lee, counsel for the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA), met with Laura Krannawitter, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn in San Francisco. Also present were Danilo Sanchez and Jason Zeller of DRA. The representatives discussed the Proposed Decision (PD) and the Alternate PD, and expressed DRA's support on certain issues.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 21, 2007
|
Filed By:
Golden State Water Company
|
|
Description:
Reply; To Comments of Division of Ratepayer Advocates on Proposed and Alternate Decisions.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 2007
|
Filed By:
CITY OF CLAREMONT
|
|
Description:
Reply; To Comments By the Division of Ratepayer Advocates.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Reply; To Comments of the Division of Ratepayer Advocates.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 2007
|
Filed By:
Golden State Water Company
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY: On August 14, 2007 Keith Switzer of Golden State Water Company (GSWC) met with Cmmr. Bohn in San Francisco. Also present were, Steve St. Marie, Laura Krannawitter, and Lindsay M. Brown, advisors to Cmmr. Bohn; Michael George, Robert Sprowls, and Patricia Schmiege, attorneys for GSWC. Switzer discussed why GSWC disagreed with the logic in the two proposed decisions for rejecting GSWC's proposed allocation. Switzer reviewed the history of GSWC's prior GRC proceedings on this allocation methodology issue and how the proposed allocation in the Proposed Decision (PD) and the Alternate Proposed Decision (AD) was inconsistent with the directives that the Commission had previously issued. Switzer also discussed the proposed three-factor allocation methodology in the PD and the AD, highlighting some of the assumptions in that method. Contact Person: Patricia Schmiege, telephone: (415) 458-1605, email: pschmiege@schmiegelaw.com.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 2007
|
Filed By:
Golden State Water Company
|
|
Description:
SUMMARY. LATE FILED: On August 6, 2007 Keith Switzer of Golden State Water Company (GSWC) met with Laura Krannawitter, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present was Sean Wilson for the Water Division of the CPUC. Switzer discussed why GSWC disagreed with the logic in the two proposed decisions for rejecting GSWC's proposed allocation. Switzer reviewed the history of GSWC's prior GRC proceedings on this allocation methodology issue and how the proposed allocation in the Proposed Decision (PD) and the Alternate Proposed Decision (AD) was inconsistent with the directives that the Commission had previously issued. Switzer also discussed the proposed three-factor allocation methodology in the PD and the AD, highlighting some of the assumptions in that method. Contact Person: Patricia Schmiege, telephone: (415) 458-1605, email: pschmiege@schmiegelaw.com.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
CITY OF CLAREMONT
|
|
Description:
Joinder.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/CPUC
|
|
Description:
On Proposed and Alternate Decisions.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 2007
|
Filed By:
Golden State Water Company
|
|
Description:
On the Proposed Decision of ALJ McKenzie and The Alternate Proposed Decision of Commissioner Bohn.
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 2007
|
Filed By:
CMMR/BOHN/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Proposed Decision of Commissioner Bohn. Opinion Granting Rate Increases for the Region II Service Area and General Office Operations of Golden State Water Company. Opening Comments, which shall not exceed 25 pages, are due no later than August 13, 2007; Reply Comments are due 5 days after Opening Comments are filed.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 2007
|
Filed By:
ALJ/McKENZIE/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion Granting Rate Increases for the Region II Service Area and General Office Operations of Golden State Water Company. Opening comments, which shall not exceed 25 pages, are due no later than August 13, 2007. Reply comments are due five days after opening comments are filed.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 2006
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ McKenzie granting interim rate relief.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/McKenzie/CPUC
|
|
Description:
OPINION GRANTING INTERIM RATE RELIEF. Comments are due December 4, 2006; reply comments - five days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2006
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; trial.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 2006
|
Filed By:
CITY OF CLAREMONT
|
|
Description:
Reply
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 2006
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
|
|
Description:
opening; trial.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
opening.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
CITY OF CLAREMONT
|
|
Description:
Post-Hearing, Opening;
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/PUC
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
|
|
Description:
joint; to adopt stipulation; stipulation attached.
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
Submitted; Volume 10.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 12, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/McKENZIE/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Denies the DRA's June 28, 2006 Motion to Strike Rebuttal Testimony, as set forth.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to DRA's motion to strike testimony.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 28, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
to strike rebuttal testimony.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
CITY OF CLAREMONT
|
|
Description:
Motion to Participate.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
CALJ/MINKIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
[Mailed 4/14/6] of Prehearing Conference.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
to withdraw [motion to compel filed on March 17, 2006].
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 2006
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Update to Application.
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
[to Application].
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Motion for an Order to Compel Data Response and Impose Fines and Sanctions.
|
Type:
RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION
|
Filing Date:
March 2, 2006
|
Filed By:
COMR/CPUC
|
|
Description:
Resolution ALJ 176-3168; Ratification of preliminary determinations of category adopted.
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2006
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY (U 133 W)
|
|
Description:
for Leave to File Confidential Material Under Seal; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Affiliate Contracts located in Volumes 4 and 5 of the General Office Workpapers of the Application filed concurrently herewith.
|
Type:
APPLICATION
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY (U133W)
|
|
Description:
In the Matter of the Application of the Golden State Water Company (U133W), for authorization to increase rates for water service in its Region II service area by $14,926,200 or 15.77% in 2007; by $4,746,000 or 4.31% in 2008; and by $6,909,300 or 6.02% in 2009. (Public Version.) (TEND 1605)
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 7
|
Decision Number:
D0804035
|
Rendered Date:
April 10, 2008
Effective Date:
April 10, 2008
|
|
Description:
Dismisses order to show cause and close proceeding. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0801020
|
Rendered Date:
January 10, 2008
Effective Date:
January 10, 2008
|
|
Description:
Orders to show cause on why the Commission should not fine Golden State Water Company $50,000. This proceeding is reopened.
|
Decision Number:
D0711036
|
Rendered Date:
November 16, 2007
Effective Date:
November 16, 2007
|
|
Description:
Rescinds D07-10-034 and separately issues corrected decision.
|
Decision Number:
D0711037
|
Rendered Date:
November 16, 2007
Effective Date:
November 16, 2007
|
|
Description:
Grants rate increases for the Region II service area and general office operations of Golden State Water Company. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0710034
|
Rendered Date:
October 18, 2007
Effective Date:
October 18, 2007
|
|
Description:
Grants rate increases for the Region II service area and general office operations of Golden State Water Company. This proceeding is closed. {D0711036 rescinded this decision (D0710034) and separately issued corrected decision}.
|
Decision Number:
D0708023
|
Rendered Date:
August 23, 2007
Effective Date:
August 23, 2007
|
|
Description:
Extends deadline for resolving application as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0612017
|
Rendered Date:
December 14, 2006
Effective Date:
December 14, 2006
|
|
Description:
Grants interim rate relief.
|