Proceeding C0011018
Date Filed: November 9, 2000
Status: Closed


Documents    Decisions    Main Index

Filer Requested Category: Adjudicatory
Preliminary Category:
Commission Designated Category: Adjudicatory
Filed By:
THE OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES

DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 35

Type: COMMENTS

Filing Date: April 9, 2007
Filed By:
DRA/YUN/CPUC
Description: Reply; on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Jones regarding AT&T's out-of-service standards

Type: COMMENTS

Filing Date: April 9, 2007
Filed By:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Description: Reply; on Proposed Decision.

Type: COMMENTS

Filing Date: April 2, 2007
Filed By:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Description: on Proposed Decision.

Type: COMMENTS

Filing Date: April 2, 2007
Filed By:
DRA/Yun/CPUC
Description: Opening; on the Proposed Decision regarding AT&T's out-of-service standards.

Type: PROPOSED DECISION

Filing Date: March 12, 2007
Filed By:
ALJ/JONES/CPUC
Description: Decision denying Petitions to Modify Decision 01-12-021, filed by AT&T California and the Division of Ratepayer Advocates. Opening comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due no later than April 1, 2007. Reply comments are due 5 days after the filing of Opening comments.

Type: REPLY

Filing Date: December 5, 2006
Filed By:
DRA/Yun/CPUC
Description: TO AT&T CALIFORNIA'S RESPONSE TO DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES' PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D01-12-021.

Type: REPLY

Filing Date: December 5, 2006
Filed By:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Description: TO DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES' RESPONSE TO AT&T CALIFORNIA'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D01-12-021

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: November 17, 2006
Filed By:
DRA/Yun/CPUC
Description: to AT&T California's Petition for Modification of Decision 01-12-021.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: November 17, 2006
Filed By:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Description: to the Petition for Modification of Decision 02-12-021 filed by the Division of Ratepayer Advocates.

Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION

Filing Date: October 18, 2006
Filed By:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Description: OF D01-12-021.

Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION

Filing Date: October 18, 2006
Filed By:
DRA/Yun/CPUC
Description: of D01-12-021.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: November 30, 2001
Filed By:
ALJ/JONES/PUC
Description: concerning taking official notice of Pacific Bell Telephone Company's ARMIS USOA Report; comments are due by 12/7/2001

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: October 24, 2001
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
Description: to the appeal of Pacific Bell Telephone Company of the Presiding Officer's Decision

Type: APPEAL

Filing Date: October 9, 2001
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: of the Presiding Officer's Decision

Type: PRESIDING OFFICERS DECISION

Filing Date: September 7, 2001
Filed By:
ALJ/JONES/PUC
Description: [Granting Complaint, in part] mailed 9/7/2001(Appeals and Requests for Review are due by 10/7/2001; Responses due 15 days thereafter; Replies are not permitted.)

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: July 5, 2001
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: Reply Brief (filing authorized by ALJ Jones)

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: July 5, 2001
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
Description: Reply brief (filing authorized by ALJ Jones)

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: June 20, 2001
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: Opening brief (filing authorized by ALJ Jones)

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: June 20, 2001
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
Description: Opening brief; pursuant to the schedule established by ALJ Jones

Type: TRANSCRIPT

Filing Date: May 18, 2001
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
Description: Submitted; Volume 3

Type: RULING

Filing Date: April 23, 2001
Filed By:
ALJ/JONES/PUC
Description: grants, in part, ORA's 3/13/2001 Motion to Publicly Release the Prepared Testimony of Linda A. Rochester in its entirety and all attachments

Type: REPLY

Filing Date: April 9, 2001
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
Description: to response of PacBell to ORA's motion for authority to publicly release the prepared testimony of Linda Rochester in its entirety and all attachments

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: March 28, 2001
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: to the Motion filed by the Office of Ratepayer Advocates

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: March 13, 2001
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
Description: for authority to publicly release the prepared testimony of Linda A. Rochester in its entirety and all attachments

Type: SCOPING RULING

Filing Date: February 16, 2001
Filed By:
CMMR/WOOD/PUC
Description: Determines that an adjudicatory categorization for this case is final. Sets the following schedule: 3/9/01 - ORA serves testimony, 4/9/01 - PacBell serves testimony, 5/14/2001 - evidentiary hearings, 6/15 - opening briefs, 6/29 - reply briefs/submission, 8/29 - presiding officer's decision 11/9/01 - conclusion of the proceeding. Designates ALJ Jones as the presiding officer. [INTERNET Users: Click on "SCOPING RULING" for the full text.]

Type: RULING

Filing Date: January 12, 2001
Filed By:
ALJ/JONES/PUC
Description: denies Pacific Bell Telephone Company's 12/19/2000 motion to dismiss the complaint; denies Pacific Bell's 12/19/2000 Request for Judicial Notice of the General Order 133-B Reports (INTERNET Users: Click on "RULING" for the full text.)

Type: REPLY

Filing Date: January 10, 2001
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: to the opposition of the ORA to PacBell's motion to dismiss

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: January 3, 2001
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
Description: to the motion to dismiss complaint of Pacific Bell

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: January 3, 2001
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
Description: in oppostiion to the request for judicial notice in support of motion to dismiss complaint of PacBell

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: December 19, 2000
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: to dismiss complaint

Type: ANSWER

Filing Date: December 19, 2000
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: to complaint

Type: REQUEST

Filing Date: December 19, 2000
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: for judicial notice in support of motion to dismiss

Type: INSTRUCTION TO ANSWER SB960

Filing Date: November 22, 2000
Filed By:
ALJ/DOCKET/PUC
Description: Answers, 12/22

Type: COMPLAINT

Filing Date: November 9, 2000
Filed By:
THE OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES
Description: vs. Pacific Bell Telephone Company: (1) for an order that defendant provide customers with guarantees of qualify repair service within a specified time and amend its tariff to include that guarantees; (2) for an order that defendant provide customers with a credit in an amount to be determined if it fails to meet repair service guarantees and amend its tariff to include that credit; (3) to establish a penalty mechanism if defendant fails to meet repair service guarantees; (4) for an order that defendant provide customers who call it for repairs with an opportunity to request a four-hour appointment period and amend its tariff to include a four-hour appointment period; (5) for an order to audit defendant's records to determine if it is in compliance with G.O. 133-B requirements that it provide the Commission all initial reports from customers relating to dissatisfaction with defendant's repair service; and (6) for any other relief the Commission deems appropriate

Type: DEFENDANT

Filing Date: November 9, 2000
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Description: The Office of Ratepayer Advocates vs. Pacific Bell Telephone Company: (1) for an order that defendant provide customers with guarantees of qualify repair service within a specified time and amend its tariff to include that guarantees; (2) for an order that defendant provide customers with a credit in an amount to be determined if it fails to meet repair service guarantees and amend its tariff to include that credit; (3) to establish a penalty mechanism if defendant fails to meet repair service guarantees; (4) for an order that defendant provide customers who call it for repairs with an opportunity to request a four-hour appointment period and amend its tariff to include a four-hour appointment period; (5) for an order to audit defendant's records to determine if it is in compliance with G.O. 133-B requirements that it provide the Commission all initial reports from customers relating to dissatisfaction with defendant's repair service; and (6) for any other relief the Commission deems appropriate

DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 3

Decision Number: D0704019

Rendered Date: April 12, 2007
Effective Date: April 12, 2007
Description: Denies petitions to modify Decision 01-12-021, filed by AT&T California and the Division of Ratepayer Advocates. This proceeding is closed.

Decision Number: D0112021

Rendered Date: December 11, 2001
Effective Date: December 11, 2001
Description: Grants the complaint to the extent set forth. This proceeding is closed..

Decision Number: D0111018

Rendered Date: November 8, 2001
Effective Date: November 8, 2001
Description: Extends the 12-month statutory deadline in this proceeding.

Top of Page    Documents    Decisions    Main Index