|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Adjudicatory
Preliminary Category:
Commission Designated Category:
Adjudicatory
|
Filed By:
DSLEXTREME.COM, INC.
SONIC.NET, INC.
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 30
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
reply [to the response of DSLExtreme.com, Inc. to the draft decision].
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2004
|
Filed By:
VERIZON ADVANCED DATA INC.
|
|
Description:
reply; on draft decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2004
|
Filed By:
DSLEXTREME.COM, INC.
SONIC.NET, INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Draft Decision.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
DSLEXTREME.COM, INC.
SONIC.NET, INC.
|
|
Description:
to the draft order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
VERIZON ADVANCED DATA INC.
|
|
Description:
on draft decision.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MCKENZIE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due by December 29, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 2003
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of counsel's new address
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
May 22, 2003
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of counsel's new firm, address and telephone numbers.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 2003
|
Filed By:
VERIZON ADVANCED DATA INC.
|
|
Description:
in Support of Motion to Dismiss Verified Amended Complaint and alternative Motion to Strike; Declaration of Thomas Wolthoff in support thereof.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 23, 2003
|
Filed By:
DSLEXTREME.COM, INC.
SONIC.NET, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Motions to Dismiss [of all defendants] and Opposition to Motion to Strike by Verizon Advanced Data Inc. [Filing authorized by ALJ McKenzie]
|
Type:
ANSWER
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Verified Answer
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to dismiss verified amended complaint
|
Type:
ANSWER
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
to amended complaint
|
Type:
ANSWER
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 2003
|
Filed By:
VERIZON ADVANCED DATA INC.
|
|
Description:
to amended complaint.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 2003
|
Filed By:
VERIZON ADVANCED DATA INC.
|
|
Description:
to dismiss the amended complaint and alternative motion to strike.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
to dismiss amended complaint
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/MCKENZIE/PUC
|
|
Description:
setting briefing schedule on motions to dismiss: motions to dismiss the amended complaint should be filed on March 28, 2003; defendants filing a motion to dismiss should at the same time file and serve an answer to the amended complaint; complainants' responses to the motions to dismiss should be filed and served on April 18, 2003; as set forth.
|
Type:
AMENDED COMPLAINT
|
Filing Date:
February 25, 2003
|
Filed By:
DSLEXTREME.COM
SONIC.NET, INC.
|
|
Description:
Verified Amended Complaint.
|
Type:
INSTRUCTION TO ANSWER SB960
|
Filing Date:
January 28, 2003
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DOCKET/PUC
|
|
Description:
Answers, 2/27/03.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
in opposition to revised Motion of Complainants for Temporary Restraining Order.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
to Motion of [Complainants] for a Temporary Restraining Order.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
Declaration of Caroline N. Mitchell in support of Opposition to Motion of [Complainants] for a Temporary Restraining Order.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 17, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
Amended Response in Opposition to Motion of Complainants for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction should not issue.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 16, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
in Opposition to Motion of Complainants for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction should not issue.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
January 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
to the Motion for Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order.
|
Type:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
|
Filing Date:
January 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
of Opposition to the Motion for Issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order and Declaration of Thomas Wolthoff.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 15, 2003
|
Filed By:
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
Declaration of Thomas Wolthoff (For Verizon California Inc. Opposition document).
|
Type:
COMPLAINT
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 2003
|
Filed By:
DSLEXTREME.COM, INC.
SONIC.NET, INC.
|
|
Description:
Complaint by DSLEXTREME.COM, INC. and SONIC.NET, INC. against Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pac Bell) (U 1001-C), SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc. (SBC ASI) (U 6346-C) and Verizon California Inc.(Verizon) (U 1002-C) (Collectively referred to as ?Defendants, and each of them?) for the following orders:
(1) For an order requiring SBC ASI and Verizon to maintain DSL Transport connectivity for all DirecTVBB subscribers until March 14, 2003 while they seek to transition their DSL service to the ISP of their choice.
(2) For an order requiring Pac Bell and Verizon and their subsidiaries to send a letter and Email to all DirecTVBB subscribers that are in the process or already have been transitioned to SBC Internet Services and Verizon Online notifying them that there is no advantage in DSL downtime whether the subscriber chooses SBC Yahoo! DSL, Verizon Online or any other ISP, and allowing these subscribers the opportunity to choose a different ISP without penalty or delay.
3) For an order requiring Defendants, and
|
Type:
DEFENDANT
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 2003
|
Filed By:
SBC PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Complaint by DSLEXTREME.COM, INC. and SONIC.NET, INC. against Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pac Bell) (U 1001-C), SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc. (SBC ASI) (U 6346-C) and Verizon California Inc.(Verizon) (U 1002-C) (Collectively referred to as ?Defendants, and each of them?) for the following orders:
(1) For an order requiring SBC ASI and Verizon to maintain DSL Transport connectivity for all DirecTVBB subscribers until March 14, 2003 while they seek to transition their DSL service to the ISP of their choice.
(2) For an order requiring Pac Bell and Verizon and their subsidiaries to send a letter and Email to all DirecTVBB subscribers that are in the process or already have been transitioned to SBC Internet Services and Verizon Online notifying them that there is no advantage in DSL downtime whether the subscriber chooses SBC Yahoo! DSL, Verizon Online or any other ISP, and allowing these subscribers the opportunity to choose a different ISP without penalty or delay.
3) For an order requiring Defendants, and
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 2003
|
Filed By:
DSLEXTREME.COM, INC.
SONIC.NET, INC
|
|
Description:
for issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order to enjoin Pacific Bell Telephone Company (U 1001-C), SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc. (U 6346-C), and Verizon California, Inc. (U 1002-C) from discontinuing DSL Transport Services and ceasing Deceptive Marketing, and for an Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction should not issue.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 2
|
Decision Number:
D0401040
|
Rendered Date:
January 22, 2004
Effective Date:
January 22, 2004
|
|
Description:
Dismisses with prejudice, the Amended Complaint submitted on February 19, 2003. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0401023
|
Rendered Date:
January 8, 2004
Effective Date:
January 8, 2004
|
|
Description:
Order extends statutory deadline.
|