|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Adjudicatory
Preliminary Category:
Commission Designated Category:
Adjudicatory
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 11
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/THORSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants Motion of XO California for leave to file portions of its brief under seal.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Opening (PUBLIC VERSION).
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
for Leave to File Confidential Portions of Opening Brief Under Seal.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BUSHEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Denies motion to dismiss. Sets the following briefing schedule: XO's opening brief - 9/3/04; Verizon's responsive brief - 9/24/04; XO's reply brief - 10/7/04. Deadline for resolving Complaint - 2/26/05.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 18, 2004
|
Filed By:
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
brief to XO's opposition to the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Verizon's Motion To Dismiss
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
Limited Appearance to Contest Jurisdiction and to Offer Answer to Complaint for purported breach of Interconnection Agreement.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
|
Type:
INSTRUCTION TO ANSWER SB960
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DOCKET/PUC
|
|
Description:
Answers, 4/14/04. [On 5/4/04, ALJ Bushey granted a third (and last) extension of time to Answer the complaint to 5/21/04. MMN] [On 4/22/04, ALJ Bushey granted a second extension of time to Answer the Complaint to 5/7/04. MMN ] [On 4/9/04, ALJ Bushey granted a first extension of time to Answer the complaint to 4/23/04. MMN]
|
Type:
COMPLAINT
|
Filing Date:
February 27, 2004
|
Filed By:
XO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
vs. Verizon California, Inc., (U 1002-C) for the following orders: (1) Requiring an Accounting of all payments owed and due to complainant for reciprocal compensation of local traffic and amounts that complainant paid to defendant for the latter?s provisioning of two-way interconnection faciIities; and, (2) Directing defendant to pay to complainant all amounts determined from the Accounting of paragraph (1), above, representing reciprocal compensation payments owed and due to complainant for exchange of traffic above the 3:1 ration of terminating to originating traffic, plus interest; and, (3) Requiring defendant to cease and desist its practice of withholding payment of reciprocal compensation for the exchange of traffic above the 3:1 ratio; and, (4) Directing defendant to refund or credit complainant for all amounts that complainant paid defendant for the latter?s provisioning of two-way interconnection facilities, plus interest; or, in the alternative, an order directing defendant to pay complainant all o
|
Type:
DEFENDANT
|
Filing Date:
February 27, 2004
|
Filed By:
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
vs. Verizon California, Inc., (U 1002-C) for the following orders: (1) Requiring an Accounting of all payments owed and due to complainant for reciprocal compensation of local traffic and amounts that complainant paid to defendant for the latter?s provisioning of two-way interconnection faciIities; and, (2) Directing defendant to pay to complainant all amounts determined from the Accounting of paragraph (1), above, representing reciprocal compensation payments owed and due to complainant for exchange of traffic above the 3:1 ration of terminating to originating traffic, plus interest; and, (3) Requiring defendant to cease and desist its practice of withholding payment of reciprocal compensation for the exchange of traffic above the 3:1 ratio; and, (4) Directing defendant to refund or credit complainant for all amounts that complainant paid defendant for the latter?s provisioning of two-way interconnection facilities, plus interest; or, in the alternative, an order directing defendant to pay complainant all o
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 1
|
Decision Number:
D0411009
|
Rendered Date:
November 10, 2004
Effective Date:
November 10, 2004
|
|
Description:
Dismissed with prejudice. This proceeding is closed.
|