|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Adjudicatory
Preliminary Category:
Commission Designated Category:
Adjudicatory
|
Filed By:
UTILISOURCE
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 19
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; to the comments of Utilisource on the draft decision of ALJ Econome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision of ALJ Econome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
UTILISOURCE
|
|
Description:
on Draft Opinion granting Motions to Dismiss cases against SDG&E and PG&E.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion Granting Motions to Dismiss. Comments are due October 10, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Joint, Supplemental; to Utilisource's Opposition to SDG&E and PG&E Motions to Dismiss.
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENTAL
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
UTILISOURCE
|
|
Description:
Opposition to Motion to Dismiss.
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Joint; to Motions to Dismiss of SDG&E and PG&E.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Permits supplemental briefing on motions to dismiss. SDG&E and PG&E can supplement their pleadings on the motions to dismiss by July 5, 2005; complainant may supplement its response to both motions to dismiss by July 15, 2005; and SDG&E and PG&E may supplement their replies by July 22, 2005.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Utilisource's opposition to SDG&E's and PG&E's motions to dismiss.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
UTILISOURCE
|
|
Description:
to SDG&E's Motion to Dismiss; and request for an opportunity to further respond.
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
CMMR/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Consolidates C04-12-025 and C04-12-026; designates ALJ Econome the presiding officer; complainant's response to motions to dismiss due 5/6; defendant's reply to motion due 5/16. Commission addresses motion to dismiss after Commission action in C04-05-014.
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Prehearing Confrerence Statement
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
UTILISOURCE
|
|
Description:
Prehearing Conference Statement
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 28, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Dismiss.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Sets prehearing conference for March 21, 2005; prehearing conference statements are due March 11, 2005.
|
Type:
ANSWER
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Complaint.
|
Type:
INSTRUCTION TO ANSWER SB960
|
Filing Date:
December 31, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DOCKET/PUC
|
|
Description:
Answers, 1/29/05.
|
Type:
DEFENDANT
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
vs. San Diego Gas and Electric Company (U 902-E), for the following orders: (1) that Complainant be entitled to Direct Access Service Requests ("DASR") its customers that have valid contracts executed prior to September 20, 2001; and, (2) that Defendant pay all lost profits to Complainant for its failure to allow Complainant to provide electric power to its customers.
|
Type:
COMPLAINT
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
UTILISOURCE
|
|
Description:
vs. San Diego Gas and Electric Company (U 902-E), for the following orders: (1) that Complainant be entitled to Direct Access Service Requests ("DASR") its customers that have valid contracts executed prior to September 20, 2001; and, (2) that Defendant pay all lost profits to Complainant for its failure to allow Complainant to provide electric power to its customers.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 1
|
Decision Number:
D0510026
|
Rendered Date:
October 27, 2005
Effective Date:
October 27, 2005
|
|
Description:
Dismissed with prejudice. These proceedings are closed.
|