Proceeding C0503010 Date Filed: March 9, 2005 Status: Closed

Documents    Decisions    Main Index

Filer Requested Category: Adjudicatory Preliminary Category: Commission Designated Category: Adjudicatory Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DOCUMENTS Number of Documents: 34 Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: March 1, 2006 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: to Complainant's application for rehearing. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 1, 2006 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: for expedited consideration of Complainant's application for rehearing. Type: REHEARING REQUEST Filing Date: February 14, 2006 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: of D06-01-006. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 10, 2006 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: reply; on the Draft Decision of ALJ Grau. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 5, 2006 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: opening; on the draft decision of ALJ Grau. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 5, 2006 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: on the draft decision of ALJ Grau resolving Complaint. Type: DRAFT DECISION Filing Date: December 13, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/GRAU/PUC Description: Comments are due January 2, 2006; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: August 22, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: to Complainant's Motion to Strike. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 12, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: reply. Type: MOTION Filing Date: August 12, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: to strike evidence submitted in support of the opening brief of Respondent NextG Networks or, in the alternative, for leave to conduct additional discovery. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 12, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 1, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: Opening; Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: August 1, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: Declaration of Theresa L. Mueller containing evidence in support of complaint. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 1, 2005 Filed By: ` Description: Opening; Type: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Filing Date: August 1, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: of Opening Brief and Declaration of Theresa L. Mueller. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: July 13, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: Submission of the Proponent's Environmental Assessment filed with NEXTG's application for a CPCN [in response to the July 6, 2005 Ruling]. Type: STIPULATION Filing Date: July 12, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: of material facts. Type: SCOPING RULING Filing Date: July 6, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/GRAU/PUC CMMR/BROWN/PUC Description: Confirms this case as an adjudication. Sets the following schedule: 7/11/05 - Complainant and Defendant file stipulation of facts; 7/20/05 - concurent opening briefs filed; 7/29/05 - concurrent reply briefs filed. Denies NextG's motion to dismiss. Type: REPLY Filing Date: June 9, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: to Complainant's response to the ALJ's ruling requesting supplemental information. Type: REPLY Filing Date: June 9, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: to Respondents' Response to ALJ's ruling requesting supplemental information. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: June 1, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: to ALJ's ruling [of May 20, 2005] requesting supplemental information, explanation of apparent ex parte communicatin, and further briefing on motion to dismiss. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: June 1, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS, INC. Description: to ALJ's ruling requesting supplemental information, etc. Type: RULING Filing Date: May 20, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/GRAU/PUC Description: Requests supplemental information, etc. [Email of 6/3/5 - Responses are now due 06/09/05. MMN] Responses to the Ruling are due on May 27, 2005 and replies are due on June 6, 2005. Type: ANSWER Filing Date: April 20, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: to the complaint. Type: REPLY Filing Date: April 19, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: to the opposition of the complainant to NextG's motion for issuance of a ruling dismissing the complaint. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: April 14, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: to Respondent's Motion for Issuance of Ruling Dismissing the Complaint. Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 14, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: to strike evidence submitted in support of Respondent's Motion for Issuance of Ruling Dismissing Complaint. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: April 14, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: partial; to Respondent's motion for expedited consideration of its Motion for Issuance of Ruling Dismissing Complaint. Type: SUPPLEMENT Filing Date: April 7, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: to the motion for expedited consideration of Motion for Issuance of Ruling Dismissing Complaint. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 30, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: for expedited consideration of the motion for issuance of assigned commissioner's ruling dismissing complaint. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 30, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: for issuance of assigned commissioner's ruling dismissing complaint. Type: INSTRUCTION TO ANSWER SB960 Filing Date: March 21, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/DOCKET/PUC Description: Answers, 4/20/05. Type: COMPLAINT Filing Date: March 9, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: vs. NextG Networks, for the following relief: The Commission should revoke the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity issued to defendant because the authority granted to offer competitive local exchange and interexchange telecommunications services has expired; and the Commission should order defendant to cease and desist from claiming that it has authority to install microcell and antenna facilities in the public rights-of-way; and the Commission should declare that defendant does not have authority to install microcellular antennas in the public rights-of-way for the purpose of providing radio frequency transport services; and the Commission should declare that defendant does not have authority to install telecommunications facilities on existing utility poles. Type: DEFENDANT Filing Date: March 9, 2005 Filed By: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Description: vs. NextG Networks, for the following relief: The Commission should revoke the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity issued to defendant because the authority granted to offer competitive local exchange and interexchange telecommunications services has expired; and the Commission should order defendant to cease and desist from claiming that it has authority to install microcell and antenna facilities in the public rights-of-way; and the Commission should declare that defendant does not have authority to install microcellular antennas in the public rights-of-way for the purpose of providing radio frequency transport services; and the Commission should declare that defendant does not have authority to install telecommunications facilities on existing utility poles. DECISIONS Number of Decisions: 2 Decision Number: D0607036 Rendered Date: July 20, 2006 Effective Date: July 20, 2006 Description: Modifies and denies rehearing of Decision 06-01-006, and denies motion for expedited consideration. This proceeding is closed. Decision Number: D0601006 Rendered Date: January 12, 2006 Effective Date: January 12, 2006 Description: The complaint of the City and County of San Francisco is denied as set forth. This case is closed.

Top of Page    Documents    Decisions    Main Index