|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Adjudicatory
Preliminary Category:
Commission Designated Category:
Adjudicatory
|
Filed By:
SUMNER K. EMERY, PRESIDENT, TELCO RETIRESS ASSOCIATION, INC.
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 6
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
CMMR/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Confirms that this is an adjudicatory proceeding. Directs parties to file case management statements by September 30, 2005. The matter will be submitted no later than December 1, 2005. The Commission decision will issue no later than May 13, 2006.
|
Type:
ANSWER
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[to Complaint].
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to dismiss the complaint.
|
Type:
INSTRUCTION TO ANSWER SB960
|
Filing Date:
May 31, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DOCKET/PUC
|
|
Description:
Answers, 7/1/05.[EXTENSION OF TIME - On 6/14/05, ALJ Ryerson via Email extended the time for SBC to Answer to 7/15/05. MMN]
|
Type:
COMPLAINT
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
SUMNER K. EMERY, PRESIDENT, TELCO RETIRESS ASSOCIATION, INC.
|
|
Description:
representing members of the Association residing within the State of California, but outside of an area served by defendant vs. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, doing business as SBC California (U 1001-C), for a Finding and Order that defendant is in violation of its Tariff, Cal P.U.C. No. A5 in that defendant unilaterally imposed new terms and conditions upon its retired employees, and for an Order that defendant immediately cease and desist from its continued unlawful practice and to return forthwith to the terms of its Tariffs.
|
Type:
DEFENDANT
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
SBC PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
representing members of the Association residing within the State of California, but outside of an area served by defendant vs. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, doing business as SBC California (U 1001-C), for a Finding and Order that defendant is in violation of its Tariff, Cal P.U.C. No. A5 in that defendant unilaterally imposed new terms and conditions upon its retired employees, and for an Order that defendant immediately cease and desist from its continued unlawful practice and to return forthwith to the terms of its Tariffs.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 1
|
Decision Number:
D0509053
|
Rendered Date:
September 30, 2005
Effective Date:
September 30, 2005
|
|
Description:
Dismisses with prejudice. This proceeding is closed.
|