|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Adjudicatory
Preliminary Category:
Commission Designated Category:
Adjudicatory
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 19
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 2006
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Opening Comments of PacBell on Draft Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
opening; on the proposed decision.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due March 27, 2006; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2006
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Response of PacBell to Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2006
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC
|
|
Description:
to Response of PacBell to Motion to Dismiss Complaint.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2006
|
Filed By:
AT&T CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
Copies of AT&T California's FCC filings per ALJ's request.
|
Type:
SCOPING RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
COMR/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
proceeding categorized as adjudicatory and hearings are necessary. Sets the following schedule: 1/19 - file/serve response to Motion to dismiss, file serve complainant/defendant's copies of FCC filings per ALJ request; 1/20 file/serve response for leave to file amended answer; 2/7 - file/serve reply to motion to dismiss and motion for leave to file amended answer; 4/4 - file/serve concurrent opening briefs; 4/26 - file/serve concurrent reply briefs.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to the motion of MAP Mobile for leave to file Amended Answer.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
Copies of FCC Filings per request of ALJ Econome.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 19, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to the motion of MAP to dismiss.
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
January 9, 2006
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
(Per 12/15/05 ALJ Ruling).
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
January 9, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[pursuant to the December 15, 2005 ruling].
|
Type:
ANSWER
|
Filing Date:
December 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
Initial; to Complaint.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
for Leave to File Amended Answer.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 28, 2005
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Dismiss Complaint.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Sets telephonic prehearing conference for January 12, 2006. Prehearing conference statements should be filed by January 9, 2005.
|
Type:
INSTRUCTION TO ANSWER SB960
|
Filing Date:
November 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DOCKET/PUC
|
|
Description:
Answers, 12/30/05.
|
Type:
COMPLAINT
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
vs. MAP Mobile Communications, Inc., for the following orders: (1) that defendant is liable to complainant for the disputed amounts, which now total over $2 Million; (2) that defendant immediately remit the full and complete payment, including late payment charges, to complainant; (3) that defendant pay to complainant interest on the disputed amounts at the rate of ten per cent pursuant to Section 3289 of the California Civil Code; and (4) for such other relief as the Commission deems just and proper.
|
Type:
DEFENDANT
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
MAP MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
vs. MAP Mobile Communications, Inc., for the following orders: (1) that defendant is liable to complainant for the disputed amounts, which now total over $2 Million; (2) that defendant immediately remit the full and complete payment, including late payment charges, to complainant; (3) that defendant pay to complainant interest on the disputed amounts at the rate of ten per cent pursuant to Section 3289 of the California Civil Code; and (4) for such other relief as the Commission deems just and proper.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 1
|
Decision Number:
D0604010
|
Rendered Date:
April 13, 2006
Effective Date:
April 13, 2006
|
|
Description:
Grants motion to dismiss, without prejudice. This proceeding is closed.
|