|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
|
Filed By:
CPUC - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 98
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE
|
|
Description:
Correcting Request for Award of Intervenor Compensation.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for compensation for substantial contribution to D06-05-016.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
GREENLINING INSTITUTE
|
|
Description:
for Award of Intervenor Compensation.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 2006
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
for Award of Compensation.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants the February 7, 2006 motion of Edison to file comments on Exhibit 900. Grants the April 25, 2006 motion of Edison to file comments on Exhibit 901.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to File Comments on Errors in Exhibit 901 - ATTACHED - Comments.
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
Submitted; Volume 32.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 3, 2006, John Hughes, Manager, Southern California Edison Company (SCE), telephoned Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn. Russ Worden, 2006 General Rate Case Manager, SCE, also participated in the conversation. The SCE representatives stated that in the most recent revised proposed decision, the new terms would eliminate the revenue requirement, but apparently allow SCE to record certain expenses in a memorandum account. The SCE representatives stated that actual terms of this memorandum account were unclear and that it may effectively eliminate utility-owned generation which would provide sustained cost-based service to SCE customers. The SCE representatives urged the Commission to explore the issues on this topic. The SCE representatives stated that in the IEP notice, its representative seemed to assert that utility-owned generation and options offered by `independent¿ generators should be treated similarly and the SCE representatives endorsed this theoretical objective. The SCE representative
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 3, 2006, Russell Worden, 2006 General Rate Case Manager, Southern California Edison Company, sent an email (attached to the notice) to David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. A copy of the email was also sent to Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn. The email was in response to previous ex parte communications made by a representative of the Independent Energy Producers.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 2006
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On March 27, 2006, Brian T. Cragg, counsel for the Independent Energy Producers Association, had a telephone conversation with Steven St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn. Cragg explained that, in order to ensure a competitive power market, project development costs for utility projects and independent power projects should be treated identically. Cragg explained that although the proposed decision (PD) for the General Rate Case (GRC) of Southern California Edison Company (SCE) embraced that principle, it proposed to include in rates the expenses of SCE's proposed Project Development Department (PDD). Cragg noted that the PD also made the PDD authorization subject to refund, but it is not clear which costs would be refunded and how and when the refund would be accomplished. Cragg suggested that the PD should be revised to be clearer. In addition, Cragg stated that a more direct way to accomplish the same result would be to deny SCE's request, to place shareholders at risk for recovery of project development cost
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 2006
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On March 24, 2006, Brian T. Cragg, counsel for the Independent Energy Producers Association, had a telephone conversation with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. During the telephone conversation, Cragg explained that, in order to ensure a competitive power market, project development costs for utility projects and independent power projects should be treated identically. Cragg also explained that it is not clear that equal treatment of project development costs would be ensured under the proposed decision's treatment of the proposal of Southern California Edison Company to establish and fund a Project Development Department at ratepayers' expense.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 22, 2006, Bruce Foster, Senior Vice President of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Andrew Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Chong, in San Francisco. Also present were John Hughes, Manager, and Russ Worden, 2006 General Rate Case (GRC) Manager, for SCE. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. The SCE representatives stated that while the proposed decision (PD) would adjust $264 million from SCE's test year request, they would focus on some $152 million of the adjustment. The SCE representatives described the need to spend on training and recruitment at levels above what may be embedded in recorded expense. Worden and Foster stated that the PD cuts SCE's incentive compensation request in half. Hughes added that the PD would remove approximately $27 million of incentive compensation that was authorized into rates by the 2003 GRC decision. The SCE representatives described the consequences of capital budget cuts, showing an itemized list of system equipment that would not be repl
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 2006
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On March 20, 2006, Brian Cragg, counsel for Independent Energy Producers Association (IEPA), had a telephone conversation with Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich. At the end of the conversation, Cragg sent to Aaron Johnson a copy of IEPA's opening brief filed on August 12, 2005. Cragg explained that the proposal of Southern California Edison Company to establish and fund a Project Development Department at ratepayers' expense would unfairly advantage utility generation over independent power producers.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On March 13, 2006, John P. Hughes, Manager of Regulatory Operations, Southern California Edison Company (Edison), met with Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present was Russell G. Worden, Project Manager for the 2006 General Rate Case (GRC) of Edison. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Edison representatives stated that while the ALJ's proposed decision (PD) would adjust $264 million from Edison's test year request, the focus of the meeting would be on some $152 million adjustments. Worden argued that the PD finds that Edison's total compensation is 'reasonable' but cuts Edison's incentive compensation request in half. Hughes stated that the PD would remove approximately $27 million of incentive compensation that was authorized into rate by the 2003 GRC decision. Edison representatives described the consequences of capital budget cuts, showing an itemized list of system equipment that would not be replaced, if the PD's cuts are adopted. Edison re
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 8, 2006, John P. Hughes, Manager of Regulatory Operations, Southern California Edison Company (Edison), met with Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Russell G. Worden, Project Manager for the 2006 General Rate Case (GRC) of Edison. Edison representatives stated that while the ALJ's proposed decision (PD) would adjust $264 million from Edison's test year request, the focus of the meeting would be on some $152 million adjustments. Worden argued that the PD find+s that Edison's total compensation is 'reasonable' but cuts Edison's incentive compensation request in half. Hughes stated that the PD would remove approximately $27 million of incentive compensation that was authorized into rate by the 2003 GRC decision. Edison representatives described the consequences of capital budget cuts, showing an itemized list of system equipment that would not be replaced, if the PD's cuts are adopted. Edison representatives explained why the PD's capital escalation rates are not a
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 9, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Re-sets the final oral argument for April 4, 2006.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 2, 2006, Russell G. Worden, Project Manager for the 2006 General Rate Case of Southern California Edison Company, sent an electronic mail (attached to the notice) to David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. The email concerned the proposed decision issued in this proceeding.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 2, 2006, Bruce Foster, Senior Vice President of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were John P. Hughes, Manager of Regulatory Operations, and Russell G. Worden, Project Manager for the 2006 General Rate Case, for SCE. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. SCE's representatives stated that while the proposed decision (PD) would adjust $264 million from SCE's test year request, they would focus on some $152 million of the adjustments. SCE representatives described the need to spend on training and recruitment at levels above what may be embedded in recorded expense. Worden described the SCE employee incentive program. Hughes noted that the PD would remove approximately $27 million of incentive compensation that was authorized into rates by the 2003 general rate case decision. SCE representatives described the consequences of capital budget cuts, showing an itemized list of system equipment that would not
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Motion to Strike Comments regarding pension issue by the Division of Ratepayer Advocates.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 21, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Setting Final Oral Argument.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/TUDISCO/ANGELOPULO/HEIDEN/SHER/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Fukutome on Edison's test year 2006 GRC request.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
|
|
Description:
reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to comments on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2006
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On February 9, 2006, Brian Cragg, representing Independent Energy Producers Association (IEPA), had a telephone conversation with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. After the conversation, Cragg emailed to David Gamson a copy of IEPA's comments (attached to the notice). Cragg discussed IEPA's concerns with the proposed decision (PD), explaining that although the PD stated that Southern California Edison Company (SCE) should bear the same cost recovery risks for development of power plants and independent power providers, the PD nevertheless granted SCE's request for recovery in rates of nearly $5 million it proposed for the Project Development Department. Cragg stated that it appears that ratepayers would absorb the costs of unsuccessful projects and general costs of the Project Development Department.
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 2006
|
Filed By:
DIRECT ACCESS CUSTOMER COALITION
|
|
Description:
to Opening Comments on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to File Comments on Errors in Exhibit 900; ATTACHED - Comments on Errors in Exhibit 900.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
DRA/TUDISCO/PUC
|
|
Description:
opening; to the proposed decision of ALJ Fukutome on Edison's test year 2006 general rate increase request.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALILANCE
|
|
Description:
On February 3, 2006, James Weil, Director of Aglet Consumer Alliance, had a telephone conversation with ALJ Fukutome. Aglet inquired into what escalation factors were used to calculate 2007 plant additions in post-test year summary of earnings tables set forth in the proposed decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM
|
|
Description:
Opening; on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
DIRECT ACCESS CUSTOMER COALITION
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Fukutome.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 2006
|
Filed By:
GREENLINING INSTITUTE
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 2006
|
Filed By:
JUST TRANSITION COALITION
|
|
Description:
to responses to Petition for Leave to Intervene.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 2006
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
to the Motion by the Just Transition Coalition re the closure of the Mohave Generating Station
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 2006
|
Filed By:
HOPI TRIBE
|
|
Description:
to Motion of Just Transition Coalition for Just Transition in response to closure of the Mohave Generating Station.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to the Motion and Petition to Intervene of Just Transition Coalition.
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
NAVAJO NATION
|
|
Description:
for leave to intervene; Response to Motion for a "Just Transition" Attached.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
JUST TRANSITION COALITION
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On January 11, 2006, Sara Steck Myers, attorney for the Just Transition Coalition (JTC), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Nancy Ryan and Rami Kahlon, advisors to Cmmr. Peevey, Leonard Selestewa, President, Black Mesa Trust, Marshall Johnson and Nicole Horseherder, Co-Directors, To' Nizhoni Ani, Whaleah Johns, Co-Director, Black Mesa Water Coalition, Enei Begaye, Water Campaigner, Indigenous Environmental Network, Roger Clark, Air and Energy Program Director, Grand Canyon Trust, Andy Bessler, Partnership Program Director, and Robert Tohe, Environmental Justice Program Representative, Sierra Club, and Paul Craig, Member, Sierra Club National Energy Committee. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Myers stated that the JTC was planning to file a petition for leave to intervene for the purpose of filing at the same time a motion for a "Just Transition" in response to closure of the Mohave Generating Station.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 19, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/BROWN/PUC
|
|
Description:
allows parties not currently on the service list fo respond by January 27 to the Just transition motion without filing a motion to intervene.
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
January 17, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due February 6, 2006; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 13, 2006
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Shotens time for responses to the Just Transition Coalition's petition for leave to intervene and Motion in response to closure, filed on January 11, 2006. Responses are due January 20, 2006.
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
January 11, 2006
|
Filed By:
BLACK MESA TRUST
BLACK MESA WATER COALITION
GRAND CANYON TRUST
JUST TRANSITION COALITION: INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK
SIERRA CLUB OF ARIZONA
TO' NIZHONI ANI
|
|
Description:
for leave to intervene; motion in response to closure of the Mohave Genearating Station attached.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ Fukutome re: Memorandum Account.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
December 29, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion on Motions for Memorandum Accounts. Comments are due January 18, 2006; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Adopts amended modeling procedures.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
|
|
Description:
On December 9, 2004, Marc Joseph, attorney for the Coalition of California Utility Employees (CUE), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Russ Worden and John Hughes of Southern California Edison Company (SCE). Joseph explained the reasoning behind the Stipulation regarding reliability performance reached by CUE, SCE, and The Utility Reform Network. Joseph explained the reasons for proposing a different method for protecting reliability in this proceeding. Joseph indicated that the basic idea of the Stipulation was not to prejudge the amount the Commission would authorize for infrastructure investment, but to ensure that whatever the Commission authorized would not be diverted to other uses. Joseph urged that the Stipulation be adopted by the Commission.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On December 9, 2005, John P. Hughes of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Russell G. Worden of SCE and Marc Joseph, attorney for the Coalition of California Utility Employees (CUE). Worden stated that the Electric Reliability stipulation between SCE, CUE and The Utility Reform Network will ensure that SCE's capital investment is directed to the areas that are most likely to preserve system reliability at current levels. Worden stated that SCE is committed to the capital investment program and stepped-up recruitment, training and retention of employees in the Transmission and Distribution Business Unit. Worden also noted that many assets in SCE's system are reaching the ends of their operating lives and must be replaced or repaired on an accelerated schedule. Worden stated that SCE prefers the terms of the pending stipulation and observed that the pending stipulation will not be unduly burdensome on SCE.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On December 7, 2005, John P. Hughes, Regulatory Operations Manager of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present was Russell G. Worden, SCE's project manager. The SCE representatives described the SCE electric system, and explained that the system requires future investment greater than level of investment in the recent past and that only by stepping-up such investments will SCE be able to preserve current levels of electric system reliability. When discussing the subject of SCE's incentive compensation, Hughes and Worden pointed out that disallowing SCE's entire request, as proposed by the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), would place company employees eight percent below market in their compensation. Hughes and Worden stated that the Consumer Price Indexing methodology for recovering the revenue requirement in years between general rate cases does not reflect SCE's cost of doing business. Hughes and Worden noted that in this pr
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On November 29, 2005, John P. Hughes, Regulatory Operations Manager of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present was Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Hughes stated that in SCE's 2003 general rate case (GRC), the Commission had approved a Post Test Year Ratemaking mechanism that reflected SCE's capital budget for years 2004-2005 and that included a one-way balancing account. Hughes suggested that the Commission should continue with this mechanism for the 2006 GRC rate cycle. Hughes explained that SCE's Results Sharing program is a form of incentive compensation for its employees. Lastly, Hughes addressed depreciation rates. Hughes stated that the currently adopted rates are outdated and do not reflect appropriate removal costs for assets that are being replaced.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Joint; to Comments on Proposed Stipulation.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants the November 2, 2005 SCE, CUE and TURN's joint motion for a waiver. Comments on the SCE, CUE, and TURN's proposed stipulation are due November 18, 2005.
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the joint motion for approval of stipulation on reliability investment incentive mechanism of Edison, CUE and TURN.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
contesting Stipulation on Reliability Investment Incentive Mechanism.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On November 8, 2005, Russell G. Worden, General Rate Case Manager of Southern California Edison Company (SCE), had a telephone conversation with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Worden discussed SCE's motion for a memorandum account (Motion). Worden stated that no party to SCE's 2006 general rate case had opposed the Motion. Worden stated that if computational errors appeared in a proposed decision, SCE would have to work with the Energy Division and all parties to make the necessary corrections, possibly delaying timely action by the Commission. Worden explained that the memorandum account is simply a step to mitigate the effects of potential delay in reaching a final decision.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Shortens time for responses to motions: responses to the November 2, 2005 joint motion of Edison, et al. are due November 14, 2005; responses to the Edison, et al.'s request that comments on the proposed stipulation should be due within 15 days, rather than 30 days, are due November 14, 2005.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FIED. On November 3, 2005, Bruce Foster, Vice President of Southern California Edison Company, delivered a letter with the attached news article to Cmmrs. Bohn, Brown, Grueneich, Kennedy, and Peevey, and Bob Lane and Stephen St. Marie, advisors to Cmmr. Bohn, David Gamson and Belinda Gatti, advisors to Cmmr. Brown, Nilgun Atamturk, Theresa Cho, and Aaron Johnson, advisors to Cmmr. Grueneich, Karl Bemesderfer and Brian Prusnek, advisors to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Julie Fitch and Rami Kahlon, advisors to Cmmr. Peevey. A copy of the documents is attached to the notice.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Joint; for Approval of Stipulation on Reliability Investment Incentive Mechanism.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Joint; for Waiver of Rule 51.2.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the update testimony of Edison.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on Update Testimony Issues.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Postage and Mohave Update Issues.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Settlement/Stipulation Conference.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Denies ORA's motion to strike filed on September 28, 2005, as set forth.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
in support of the ORA's motion to strike.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to ORA Motion to strike a portion of the update testimony of Edison.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Shortens time for responses to Motion of the ORA to strike testimony, filed on September 28, 2005. Responses to the motion are due October 4, 2005.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Establish a Memorandum Account for its 2006 SONGS-Related Revenue Requirement.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
|
|
Description:
to strike a portion of the update testimony of Edison.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
|
|
Description:
for an order shortening time for responses to motion of the ORA to strike a portion of Edison's update testimony.
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
September 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
|
|
Description:
of certificates of compliance.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
on Filing Requirements.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
WESTERN MANUFACTURED HOUSING COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to Adopt Settlement Agreement.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
DIRECT ACCESS CUSTOMER COALITION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants Edison's motion for receipt in evidence of late-filed Exhibit, filed on August 24, 2005.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2005
|
Filed By:
ORA/TUDISCO/PUC
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
submitting Stipulation re: Priority 5 Maintenance and Requesting Waiver of Rule 51.1(B) and 51.2.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Shortens time for responses to the August 24, 2005 Edsion's motion to August 29, 2005.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for Receipt Into Evidence of Late-Filed Exhibit and Request for Order Shortening Time to Respond.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
Opening
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
August 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Regarding Exhibits.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Adopts modeling procedures.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FUKUTOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Denies SDG&E's July 8th motion to strike portions of Edison's rebuttal testimony.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to ORA Motion to Strike.
|
Type:
COMMISSION INVESTIGATION
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 2005
|
Filed By:
CPUC - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Order Instituting Investigation on the Commission's own motion into the rates, operations, practices, service and facilities of Southern California Edison Company. (Consolidates this proceeding with A04-12-014. Determines that this is a ratesetting proceeding and that hearings are required.)
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 3
|
Decision Number:
D0610018
|
Rendered Date:
October 5, 2006
Effective Date:
October 5, 2006
|
|
Description:
Grants intervenor compensation awards to Aglet Consumer Alliance, Greenlining Institute, and The Utility Reform Network for substantial contributions to Decision 06-05-016. These proceedings are closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0605016
|
Rendered Date:
May 11, 2006
Effective Date:
May 11, 2006
|
|
Description:
Application (A.) 04-12-014 is granted to the extent set forth in this Order. A04-12-014 and I05-05-024 are closed. (Comr. Bohn, being necessarily absent, did not participate.)
|
Decision Number:
D0601020
|
Rendered Date:
January 12, 2006
Effective Date:
January 12, 2006
|
|
Description:
Authorizes Southern California Edison Company to establish a memorandum account to track the change in revenue requirement adopted in this proceeding during the period between January 12, 2006 and the effective date of the final decision. Likewise, authorizes San Diego Gas & Electric Company to establish a memorandum account to track the change in revenue requirement related to its interest in the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station adopted in this proceeding during the period between January 12, 2006 and the effective date of the final decision.
|