|
|
|
|
Filer Requested Category:
Preliminary Category:
Ratesetting
Commission Designated Category:
Ratesetting
|
Filed By:
CPUC - PG&E, EDISON, SDG&E
|
|
|
DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 419
(only the most current 100 are displayed)
Display all documents for this proceeding
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
Filing in compliance with O.P.13 of Decision 05-11-009.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 14 of D05-11-009: Completed Research Report.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Refrigerant Based Energy Storage for Air Conditionng Report per O.P. 13 of Decision 05-11-009.
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
May 25, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Completed Research Report Not Previously Filed in Accordance with Ordering Paragraph 14 of D05-11-009.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(Pursuant to O.P.13 of Decision 05-11-009) - Evaluation of 2005 statewide large nonresidential day-ahead and reliability demand response program report.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 2, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(Per D.05-11-009, O.P. 13)
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(pursuant to O.P.13 of D.05-11-009).
|
Type:
AMENDMENT
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
2nd; to Request for Compensation.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
per O.P.13 of D.05-11-009 (Demand Response Research Reports).
|
Type:
AMENDMENT
|
Filing Date:
March 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to Request for Compensation for Substantial Contribution to Phase 2 Rulings and Decisions.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Per Decision 05-11-009, O.P. 13. - Air conditioner cycling summer discount program evaluation study.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for compensation for substantial contribution to Phase 2 rulings and decisions.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
in compliance with D05-11-009: Filing of a List of Completed Researh Reports and Completed Researh Reports Not Previously Filed.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
per O.P 13 of D.05-11-009.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs (for October 2005).
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on Draft Decision of ALJ Cooke.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on the draft decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision closing the Rulemaking.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision of ALJ Cooke closing this Rulemaking.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ Cooke.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision closing Rulemaking and identifying future activities related to Demand Response.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Completed Research Report entitled "Impact Evaluation of the California Statewide Pricing Pilot." [Report may be downloaded at www.energy.ca.gov/demandresponse/documents/index.html ]
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Final Report + Program Impact Evaluation + Post SPP Rate Choice Assessment Research.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Residential Automated Demand Response System (ADRS) Pilot Economic Analysis Report.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for authorization to continue to operate 2005 demand response programs for first three months of 2006.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for September 2005.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due November 8, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for Authorization to continue to operate 2005 Demand Response Programs in the First Quarter of 2006 pending a Final Decision on (this) Application.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
On October 1, 2005, Tom D. Tamarkin, President of USCL Corporation, sent an email with four documents attached to ALJ Cooke. On the same day of October 1, 2005, Tamarkin sent the same documents to Cmmrs. Kennedy and Peevey, via Federal Express, to deliver on October 3, 2005. Copies of the written materials and the text of the email are attached to the notice.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to PG&E's response to motion to add minimum functionality requirement.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Motion of USCL Corp.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for August 2005.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to USCL Motion to Add Minimum Functionality Requirement
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
On September 6, 2005, Brian Cragg, counsel for USCL Corporation (USCL), spoke by telephone with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey. Cragg stated that USCL was filing a petition to intervene and a motion requesting the Commission to add another functionality requirement to the six advanced metering infrastructure functions currently identified in this proceeding. Cragg described how the motion asked the Commission to require installation of a universal, nonproprietary, interactive interface in the customer meter and how such an interface would greatly enhance the Commission's program.
|
Type:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
Amended; (of Petition to Intervene; and Motion to Add Minimum Functionality Requirement, filed 9/6/05.)
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to intervene. (Per ALJ Cooke - Responses should be filed no later than 09/22/05. MMN)
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to Add Minimum Functionality Requirement. (Per ALJ Cooke - Responses should be filed no later than 09/22/05. MMN)
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for July 2005.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for June 2005.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Joint; on Draft Opinion dated June 14, 2005.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for May 2005.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 15, 2005, Bill Stock, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Jana Corey, Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. PG&E representatives asked that the Commission continue to resolve issues and proceedings associated with AMI in order to keep the project on a timely schedule.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion adopting an incremental budget for the statewide pricing pilot, advanced demand response system, and information display pilot. Comments are due July 4, 2005; and reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 7, 2005, Bruce C. Foster of Southern California Edison Company (Edison) met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, and Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, and Michael R. Hoover, Lynda Ziegler, Gene E. Rodrigues, Mark Wallenrod, Jennifer Hasbrouck and Don Arambula, for Edison. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Edison's representatives presented an overview of Edison's application for approval of demand response programs, goals and budgets for 2006-2008, filed June 1, 2005, and Edison's application for approval of 2006-2008 energy efficiency program plans and public goods charge and procurement funding requests, filed June 2, 2005.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for April 2005.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants SDG&E's January 15, 2005 motion for protective order and motion to file under seal and PG&E's March 15, 2005 motion to file under seal, as set forth.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for March 2005.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the budget for the statewide pricing pilot, advanced demand response system, and information display pilot.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 11, 2005, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Kennedy in San Francisco. Also present were Robert Bemesderfer, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Tom King, Executive Vice President, Tom Bottorff, Senior Vice President, Customer Service and Revenue, Jana Corey, Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Bottorff stated that PG&E's business case has been updated and is considerably stronger that the one filed last October. Bottorff stated that the case is so strong that nearly 80 percent of the costs are now being offset by operational savings. Bottoff explained the significance of the much-improved business case and stated that AMI has been successfully deployed in more than 20 utility service areas nationwide. Bottorff also described PG&E's request for the Commission approval to launch an initial deployment for an AMI project at a cost of $49 million.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for Feb 2005.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 15, 2005, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and Tom Bottorff, Senior Vice President, Customer Service and Revenue, Jana Cory, Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Bottorff stated that PG&E's business case has been updated and is considerably stronger than the one filed last October. Bottorff also reported on the status of PG&E's Request for Proposals on AMI. Bottorff also described PG&E's request for the Commission approval to launch an initial deployment for an AMI project at a cost of $49 million.
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER
|
|
Description:
for Compensation.
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Initial; concerning implementation of critical peak pricing.
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for Leave to File Confidential Material Under Seal; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Unredacted Version of Updated Preliminary AMI Business Case Analysis.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Updated Preliminary AMI Business Case Analysis (PUBLIC VERSION).
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
THIS IS A CORRECTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON FEBRUARY 2, 2005, AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF FEBRUARY 4, 2005. On January 27, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Jana Cory, Director, AMI Initiative, and Susan Dowling, Manager, ETS, for PG&E. A document titled - Preliminary AMI Timing Estimate' (attached to the notice) was used. Cory discussed PG&E's proposed AMI pre-deployment schedule, the product evaluation process and the steps PG&E is taking to evaluate due diligence. Dowling discussed the project budget and the recording of costs in the AMDRA account.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on Interruptible Load Programs, Rotating Outage Activities and Demand Response Programs for January 2005.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to SDG&E's motion for clarification.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[in compliance with D04-11-034, Ordering Paragraph 3] Cost Effectiveness Analysis of the Demand Reserve Partnership Program.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Comments on Proposed Management Agreement between PG&E and the California Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority in connection with the Demand Response Partnership Program.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for Clarification of Decision 05-01-056.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Corrections to January 12, 2005 Supplemental Filing (PUBLIC VERSION).
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Budget Request concerning 2005 Statewide Pricing Pilot for Residential and small Commercial Customers.
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Motion for Protective Order; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Attachment 1 to the Corrections to January 12, 2005 Supplemental Filing, filed concurrently herewith.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Proposed Management Services Agreement Between PG&E and the California Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority in connection with the demard reserves partnership program [in accordance with D04-11-034, Ordering Paragraph 2].
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On January 27, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Jana Cory, Director, AMI Initiative, and Susan Dowling, Manager, ETS, for PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cory discussed PG&E's proposed AMI pre-deployment schedule, the product evaluation process and the steps PG&E is taking to evaluate due diligence. Dowling discussed the project budget and the recording of costs in the AMDRA account.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 25, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply; on Draft Decision approving demand response programs for 2005.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on December 28, 2004 draft decision adopting 2005 demand response programs.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Comments on Draft Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Cooke.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE ENERGY COALITION
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Draft Decision.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On January 12, 2005, William Booth for California Manufacturers & Technology Association met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Pres. Peevey in two separate meetings in San Francisco. Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, participated in the meeting with Pres. Peevey. Also present was Keith McCrea for California Large Energy Consumers Association. Booth and McCrea discussed the assigned commissioner¿s ruling issued on December 8, 2004. Booth and McCrea expressed their concerns about the need for mandatory CPP programs for the upcoming summer and explained that many of the largest customers engaged in manufacturing and process industries were not in a position to shift load. Booth stated that any proposal to terminate the interruptible program would be detrimental to maintaining system reliability. McCrea emphasized that the largest customers over 500kW tended to have flatter loads and that demand response programs would be directed at customer classes which drive the peak.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on draft decision approving demand response program for 2005.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
on the draft opinion approving 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
|
|
Description:
opening; on the draft decision of Cmmr. Peevey and ALJ Cooke approving 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of Cmmr Peevey and ALJ Cooke.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on December 28, 2004 draft decision adopting 2005 demand response programs.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision of Cmmr. Peevey and ALJ Cooke.
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENTAL
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Supplemental Preliminary Business Case Filing [pursuant to the November 24, 2004 ruling].
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for protective order; confidential materials attached and filed under seal, namely, Appendices A and B to the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case Supplemental Filing, filed concurrently herewith.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Revised Preliminary Analysis of Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case Supplemental Filing (PUBLIC VERSION).
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
January 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
ENERGY/CHAN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Final; Working Group 2 demand response program evaluation - program year 2004.
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 31, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On December 23, 2004, Steven Moss, Executive Director of San Francisco Community Power (SF Power), sent to ALJ Cooke comments, via email (copies attached to the notice). The comments related to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) `Proposal Concerning Working Group 2 Programs and Related Issues'. SF Power noted that the utility does not provide sufficient details to fully comment on its proposal. SF Power noted that SF Power is currently implementing energy efficiency, demand-response, and renewable programs in the City. Moss indicated that it is unclear how PG&E is defining `cooperative'. SF Power explained that there are conflicting state and federal statutes relating to what constitutes a cooperative structure, which makes it difficult for large number of parties to participate in `traditional' cooperative arrangements. Moss also stated that, by willfully ignoring SF Power's current activities, PG&E seems to be using this initiative both to obtain load shifts, and to disrupt the operation
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
to intervene.
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
to intervene.
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
December 28, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion approving 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets. Comments are due January 17, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; to TURN's comments on 20/20 program proposals.
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Comments of TURN.
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Directs the filing of rate design proposals for large customers. Applications should be filed by January 20, 2005.
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on utility 20/20 program proposals for 2005.
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to November 5, 2004 ruling: 20/20 program proposal.
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to additional demand response program proposals for 2005.
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Proposal for a 20/20 Incentive Program for Residential and Small Commercial Customers who enroll in Power Pledge for Summer 2005.
|
DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 15
|
Decision Number:
D0606018
|
Rendered Date:
June 15, 2006
Effective Date:
June 15, 2006
|
|
Description:
Awards The Utility Reform Network $204,546.05 in compensation for its substantial contributions to Decision (D.) 04-01-012, D.05-01-056, D.05-07-011, and D.05-11-009. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0511009
|
Rendered Date:
November 18, 2005
Effective Date:
November 18, 2005
|
|
Description:
Closes this rulemaking and identifies future activities related to demand response. This proceeding is closed.
|
Decision Number:
D0507011
|
Rendered Date:
July 21, 2005
Effective Date:
July 21, 2005
|
|
Description:
Adopts an incremental budget for the statewide pricing pilot, advanced demand response system, and information display pilot.
|
Decision Number:
D0507025
|
Rendered Date:
July 21, 2005
Effective Date:
July 21, 2005
|
|
Description:
Grants intervenor compensation to San Francisco Community Power for substantial contributions to D05-01-056.
|
Decision Number:
D0502030
|
Rendered Date:
February 22, 2005
Effective Date:
February 22, 2005
|
|
Description:
Corrects errors in D05-01-056.
|
Decision Number:
D0501056
|
Rendered Date:
January 27, 2005
Effective Date:
January 27, 2005
|
|
Description:
Approves 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets. (Comr. Grueneich recused herself from this agenda item and was not part of the quorum in its consideration.)
|
Decision Number:
D0411034
|
Rendered Date:
November 19, 2004
Effective Date:
November 19, 2004
|
|
Description:
Directs PG&E to negotiate an agreement with the California Power Authority for operation of the Demand Reserves Partnership program. (Comr. Wood dissents. Comr. Lynch reserves the right to file a dissent.)
|
Decision Number:
D0401012
|
Rendered Date:
January 8, 2004
Effective Date:
January 8, 2004
|
|
Description:
Approves the calendar year 2004 budget request of SCE, PG&E, SDG&E for the Statewide Pricing Pilot for residential and small commercial customers as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0310011
|
Rendered Date:
October 2, 2003
Effective Date:
October 2, 2003
|
|
Description:
Awards The Utility Reform Network $86,981 in compensation for its substantial contribution to D03-03-036 and D03-06-032. (Comr. Kennedy, being necessarily absent, did not participate).
|
Decision Number:
D0309078
|
Rendered Date:
September 19, 2003
Effective Date:
September 19, 2003
|
|
Description:
Corrects an inadvertent error in Attachment B to D03-06-032.
|
Decision Number:
D0309067
|
Rendered Date:
September 18, 2003
Effective Date:
September 18, 2003
|
|
Description:
Awards the San Francisco Community Power Cooperative $72,702.33 for its substantial contribution to D03-03-036 as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0306082
|
Rendered Date:
June 28, 2003
Effective Date:
June 28, 2003
|
|
Description:
Corrects an error in D03-06-032.
|
Decision Number:
D0306032
|
Rendered Date:
June 5, 2003
Effective Date:
June 5, 2003
|
|
Description:
Interim Opinion In Phase 1. Addresses demand response goals and adopts tariffs and programs for large customers. (Comrs. Lynch and Wood will file a dissent).
|
Decision Number:
D0303051
|
Rendered Date:
March 24, 2003
Effective Date:
March 24, 2003
|
|
Description:
Corrects error in Attachment D of D03-03-036 as set forth.
|
Decision Number:
D0303036
|
Rendered Date:
March 13, 2003
Effective Date:
March 13, 2003
|
|
Description:
Directs respondent investor owned utilities (IOU) to file/serve compliance filings as set forth by 4/14. Directs IOUs to file/serve a final plan for evaluation demand response by 7/1; and an evaluation plan detailing how they plan to anlyze the demand reponse by 8/1. Approves the Statewide Pricing Pilot with a targeted start date of 7/1. (Com Lynch will file a concurrence.)
|