|
Number of Documents: 419
|
|
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 2006
|
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
Description:
Filing in compliance with O.P.13 of Decision 05-11-009.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 14 of D05-11-009: Completed Research
Report.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Refrigerant Based Energy Storage for Air Conditionng Report per O.P. 13 of
Decision 05-11-009.
|
|
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
May 25, 2006
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Completed Research Report Not Previously Filed in Accordance with Ordering
Paragraph 14 of D05-11-009.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(Pursuant to O.P.13 of Decision 05-11-009) - Evaluation of 2005 statewide large
nonresidential day-ahead and reliability demand response program report.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 2, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(Per D.05-11-009, O.P. 13)
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(pursuant to O.P.13 of D.05-11-009).
|
|
|
Type:
AMENDMENT
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
2nd; to Request for Compensation.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
per O.P.13 of D.05-11-009 (Demand Response Research Reports).
|
|
|
Type:
AMENDMENT
|
Filing Date:
March 22, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to Request for Compensation for Substantial Contribution to Phase 2 Rulings and
Decisions.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 2006
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Per Decision 05-11-009, O.P. 13. - Air conditioner cycling summer discount
program evaluation study.
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 2006
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for compensation for substantial contribution to Phase 2 rulings and decisions.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
in compliance with D05-11-009: Filing of a List of Completed Researh Reports
and Completed Researh Reports Not Previously Filed.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
per O.P 13 of D.05-11-009.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs (for October 2005).
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on Draft Decision of ALJ Cooke.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on the draft decision.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision closing the Rulemaking.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision of ALJ Cooke closing this Rulemaking.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ Cooke.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision closing Rulemaking and identifying future activities related
to Demand Response.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Completed Research Report entitled "Impact Evaluation of the California
Statewide Pricing Pilot." [Report may be downloaded at
www.energy.ca.gov/demandresponse/documents/index.html ]
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Final Report + Program Impact Evaluation + Post SPP Rate Choice Assessment
Research.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Residential Automated Demand Response System (ADRS) Pilot Economic Analysis
Report.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for authorization to continue to operate 2005 demand response programs for
first three months of 2006.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs for September 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due November 8, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are
filed.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for Authorization to continue to operate 2005 Demand Response Programs in the
First Quarter of 2006 pending a Final Decision on (this) Application.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
On October 1, 2005, Tom D. Tamarkin, President of USCL Corporation, sent an
email with four documents attached to ALJ Cooke. On the same day of October 1,
2005, Tamarkin sent the same documents to Cmmrs. Kennedy and Peevey, via
Federal Express, to deliver on October 3, 2005. Copies of the written materials
and the text of the email are attached to the notice.
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to PG&E's response to motion to add minimum functionality requirement.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Motion of USCL Corp.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs for August 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to USCL Motion to Add Minimum Functionality Requirement
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
On September 6, 2005, Brian Cragg, counsel for USCL Corporation (USCL), spoke
by telephone with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey. Cragg stated that USCL
was filing a petition to intervene and a motion requesting the Commission to
add another functionality requirement to the six advanced metering
infrastructure functions currently identified in this proceeding. Cragg
described how the motion asked the Commission to require installation of a
universal, nonproprietary, interactive interface in the customer meter and how
such an interface would greatly enhance the Commission's program.
|
|
|
Type:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
Amended; (of Petition to Intervene; and Motion to Add Minimum Functionality
Requirement, filed 9/6/05.)
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to intervene. (Per ALJ Cooke - Responses should be filed no later than
09/22/05. MMN)
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 2005
|
Filed By:
USCL CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to Add Minimum Functionality Requirement. (Per ALJ Cooke - Responses should be
filed no later than 09/22/05. MMN)
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs for July 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs for June 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Joint; on Draft Opinion dated June 14, 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs for May 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 15, 2005, Bill Stock, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and
Electric Company (PG&E), met with Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San
Francisco. Also present were Jana Corey, Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael
Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was
used. PG&E representatives asked that the Commission continue to resolve issues
and proceedings associated with AMI in order to keep the project on a timely
schedule.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion adopting an incremental budget for the statewide pricing pilot,
advanced demand response system, and information display pilot. Comments are
due July 4, 2005; and reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On June 7, 2005, Bruce C. Foster of Southern California Edison Company (Edison)
met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Also
present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, David Gamson, advisor to
Cmmr. Brown, Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, and Stephen St. Marie,
advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, and Michael R. Hoover, Lynda Ziegler, Gene E.
Rodrigues, Mark Wallenrod, Jennifer Hasbrouck and Don Arambula, for Edison.
Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Edison's representatives
presented an overview of Edison's application for approval of demand response
programs, goals and budgets for 2006-2008, filed June 1, 2005, and Edison's
application for approval of 2006-2008 energy efficiency program plans and
public goods charge and procurement funding requests, filed June 2, 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 20, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs for April 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants SDG&E's January 15, 2005 motion for protective order and motion to file
under seal and PG&E's March 15, 2005 motion to file under seal, as set forth.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs for March 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the budget for the statewide pricing pilot, advanced demand response system,
and information display pilot.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On April 11, 2005, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Kennedy in San
Francisco. Also present were Robert Bemesderfer, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and
Tom King, Executive Vice President, Tom Bottorff, Senior Vice President,
Customer Service and Revenue, Jana Corey, Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael
Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Bottorff stated that PG&E's business case has
been updated and is considerably stronger that the one filed last October.
Bottorff stated that the case is so strong that nearly 80 percent of the costs
are now being offset by operational savings. Bottoff explained the significance
of the much-improved business case and stated that AMI has been successfully
deployed in more than 20 utility service areas nationwide. Bottorff also
described PG&E's request for the Commission approval to launch an initial
deployment for an AMI project at a cost of $49 million.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand
response programs for Feb 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On March 15, 2005, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Pres. Peevey in San
Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and Tom
Bottorff, Senior Vice President, Customer Service and Revenue, Jana Cory,
Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Bottorff
stated that PG&E's business case has been updated and is considerably stronger
than the one filed last October. Bottorff also reported on the status of PG&E's
Request for Proposals on AMI. Bottorff also described PG&E's request for the
Commission approval to launch an initial deployment for an AMI project at a
cost of $49 million.
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER
|
|
Description:
for Compensation.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Initial; concerning implementation of critical peak pricing.
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for Leave to File Confidential Material Under Seal; Confidential Materials
Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Unredacted Version of Updated
Preliminary AMI Business Case Analysis.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Updated Preliminary AMI Business Case Analysis (PUBLIC VERSION).
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
THIS IS A CORRECTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON
FEBRUARY 2, 2005, AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF FEBRUARY 4, 2005. On January
27, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and
Electric Company (PG&E), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San
Francisco. Also present were Jana Cory, Director, AMI Initiative, and Susan
Dowling, Manager, ETS, for PG&E. A document titled - Preliminary AMI Timing
Estimate' (attached to the notice) was used. Cory discussed PG&E's proposed AMI
pre-deployment schedule, the product evaluation process and the steps PG&E is
taking to evaluate due diligence. Dowling discussed the project budget and the
recording of costs in the AMDRA account.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 22, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Report on Interruptible Load Programs, Rotating Outage Activities and Demand
Response Programs for January 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to SDG&E's motion for clarification.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[in compliance with D04-11-034, Ordering Paragraph 3] Cost Effectiveness
Analysis of the Demand Reserve Partnership Program.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Comments on Proposed Management Agreement between PG&E and the California
Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority in connection with the
Demand Response Partnership Program.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for Clarification of Decision 05-01-056.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Corrections to January 12, 2005 Supplemental Filing (PUBLIC VERSION).
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Budget Request concerning 2005 Statewide Pricing Pilot for Residential and
small Commercial Customers.
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Motion for Protective Order; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under
Seal, namely, Attachment 1 to the Corrections to January 12, 2005 Supplemental
Filing, filed concurrently herewith.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Proposed Management Services Agreement Between PG&E and the California Consumer
Power and Conservation Financing Authority in connection with the demard
reserves partnership program [in accordance with D04-11-034, Ordering Paragraph
2].
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 2, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On January 27, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory
Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Julie Fitch,
advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Jana Cory,
Director, AMI Initiative, and Susan Dowling, Manager, ETS, for PG&E. Written
material (attached to the notice) was used. Cory discussed PG&E's proposed AMI
pre-deployment schedule, the product evaluation process and the steps PG&E is
taking to evaluate due diligence. Dowling discussed the project budget and the
recording of costs in the AMDRA account.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 25, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply; on Draft Decision approving demand response programs for 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; on December 28, 2004 draft decision adopting 2005 demand response
programs.
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Comments on Draft Decision.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on Proposed Decision of ALJ Cooke.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 19, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE ENERGY COALITION
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Draft Decision.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On January 12, 2005, William Booth for California Manufacturers & Technology
Association met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Pres. Peevey in
two separate meetings in San Francisco. Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey,
participated in the meeting with Pres. Peevey. Also present was Keith McCrea
for California Large Energy Consumers Association. Booth and McCrea discussed
the assigned commissioner¿s ruling issued on December 8, 2004. Booth and McCrea
expressed their concerns about the need for mandatory CPP programs for the
upcoming summer and explained that many of the largest customers engaged in
manufacturing and process industries were not in a position to shift load.
Booth stated that any proposal to terminate the interruptible program would be
detrimental to maintaining system reliability. McCrea emphasized that the
largest customers over 500kW tended to have flatter loads and that demand
response programs would be directed at customer classes which drive the peak.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on draft decision approving demand response program for 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
on the draft opinion approving 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
|
|
Description:
opening; on the draft decision of Cmmr. Peevey and ALJ Cooke approving 2005
demand response goals, programs and budgets.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of Cmmr Peevey and ALJ Cooke.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on December 28, 2004 draft decision adopting 2005 demand response programs.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 14, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision of Cmmr. Peevey and ALJ Cooke.
|
|
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENTAL
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Supplemental Preliminary Business Case Filing [pursuant to the November 24,
2004 ruling].
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for protective order; confidential materials attached and filed under seal,
namely, Appendices A and B to the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business
Case Supplemental Filing, filed concurrently herewith.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Revised Preliminary Analysis of Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2005
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case Supplemental Filing (PUBLIC
VERSION).
|
|
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
January 11, 2005
|
Filed By:
ENERGY/CHAN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Final; Working Group 2 demand response program evaluation - program year 2004.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 31, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On December 23, 2004, Steven Moss, Executive Director of San
Francisco Community Power (SF Power), sent to ALJ Cooke comments, via email
(copies attached to the notice). The comments related to Pacific Gas and
Electric Company's (PG&E) `Proposal Concerning Working Group 2 Programs and
Related Issues'. SF Power noted that the utility does not provide sufficient
details to fully comment on its proposal. SF Power noted that SF Power is
currently implementing energy efficiency, demand-response, and renewable
programs in the City. Moss indicated that it is unclear how PG&E is defining
`cooperative'. SF Power explained that there are conflicting state and federal
statutes relating to what constitutes a cooperative structure, which makes it
difficult for large number of parties to participate in `traditional'
cooperative arrangements. Moss also stated that, by willfully ignoring SF
Power's current activities, PG&E seems to be using this initiative both to
obtain load shifts, and to disrupt the operations of an existing,
community-based and the CPUC-funded entity. SF Power commented that, in this
respect, it would seem as if PG&E should be required to follow similar
`affiliate' rules as those proposed for energy efficiency measures.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
to intervene.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION
|
|
Description:
to intervene.
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
December 28, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion approving 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets. Comments
are due January 17, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; to TURN's comments on 20/20 program proposals.
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Comments of TURN.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Directs the filing of rate design proposals for large customers. Applications
should be filed by January 20, 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on utility 20/20 program proposals for 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to November 5, 2004 ruling: 20/20 program proposal.
|
|
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to additional demand response program proposals for 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Proposal for a 20/20 Incentive Program for Residential and Small Commercial
Customers who enroll in Power Pledge for Summer 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Term Sheet Between PG&E and the California Power Authority [pursuant to
D04-11-034].
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Calls for a technical conference, delays filing date of utility advanced
metering infrastructure applications to March 15, 2005, and directs the filing
of rate design proposals for large customers by January 12, 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Errata to Response filed October 15, 2004. [Filed per authorization from ALJ
Cooke.]
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on additional demand response programs proposed for 2005-2008 [pursuant to
November 5, 2004 ruling].
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to PG&E Motion for extension of time to file advanced metering infrastructure
application.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply; on utility demand response programs proposed for 2005-2008.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; regarding summer 2005 demand response proposals.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
SILICON VALLEY MANUFACTURING GROUP
|
|
Description:
reply; on proposal of PG&E concerning working group 2 programs and related
issues.
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Comments on its Oct 15, 2004 and Oct 29, 2004 Demand Response Program
Proposals.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on demand response programs proposals for 2005-2008.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for extension of time to file advanced metering infrastructure application.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to November 5, 2004 assigned commissioner's ruling: Additional Demand Response
Program Proposals.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Additional Demand Response Program Proposals for 2005 as required by ACR issued
Nov 5, 2004.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Proposal for a 20/20 Incentive Program for Commercial and Industrial Customers
to address system reliability needs in Summer 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES
|
|
Description:
on utility filings concerning working group 2 programs and related issues.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(PUBLIC and CONFIDENTIAL VERSIONS) Supplemental filing regarding Preliminary
AMI Business Case Analysis - Appendix B.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Directs utilities to file additional 2005 programs, budgets, and megawatt
goals. Filings are due by November 15, 2004. Comments on the filings may be
filed by November 22, 2004; reply comments - November 29, 2004.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
PUBLIC VERSION. (CONFIDENTIAL VERSION CONTAINS PROTECTED MATERIALS [filed under
seal].) Comments on utility demand response programs proposed for 2005-2008.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/REIGER/PUC
|
|
Description:
on PG&E, Edison, and SDG&E's demand response program proposals for 2005-2008
[pursuant to th June 2, 2004 ruling].
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants in part PG&E and SDG&E leave to file under seal.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Continues availability of tariffs and programs under the statewide pricing
pilot, as set forth.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Filing to Propose 2005-2008 Reliability Triggered Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(PUBLIC VERSION) Preliminary Analysis regarding Advanced Metering
Infrastructure Business Case.
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Motion for Protective Order; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under
Seal, namely, Appendix C to the Preliminary Analysis Regarding Advanced
Metering Infrastructure Business Case filed concurrently herewith.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Preliminary Analysis of Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Response to ALJ's Ruling approving 2004 Schedule and Plan for the Statewide
Pricing Pilot Evaluation and Customer Research Activities and establishing
process for evaluation of proposed 2005 Price Respondive Demand.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Demand Response Program Proposals for 2005-2008.
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
for protective order; confidential material attached and filed under seal,
namely, Appendix B - Case Results (Cases B1-B19) to preliminary AMI business
case analysis.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REDACTED. Preliminary AMI bisuness case analysis [pursuant to the July 21, 2004
ruling].
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(PUBLIC VERSION) Proposal concerning Working Group 2 Programs and Related
Issues.
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Motion for Protective Order; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under
Seal, namely, Appendix C to the Proposal filed concurrently herewith.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 2004
|
Filed By:
ENERGY/CHAN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation - Process Evaluation Update.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 12, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On October 6, 2004, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San
Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Thomas
Bottorff, Senior Vice President of Customer Service and Revenue, for PG&E.
Tomcala and Bottorff updated the Commission on the status of PG&E's AMI
business planning and also reported on the issuance of PG&E's Request for
Proposals on AMI.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAN DIEGO GAS & EECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to ALJ Ruling regarding Statewide Pricing Pilot Decommissioning and Reply to
Comments of ORA on the Joint Utilities Formal Strategy to close the Statewide
Pricing Pilot for Residential and Small Commercial Customers.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Regarding Statewide Pricing Pilot Decommissioning. Responses to the Ruling
should be filed not later than October 1, 2004. [EXTENSION GRANTED - On Sept
29, 2004, ALJ Cooke orally granted the request of PG&E to extend the Response
deadline to Oct 8, 2004. MMN]
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/REIGER/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the joint utilities formal strategy to close the statewide pricing pilot for
residential and small commercial customers. [EXTENSION GRANTED - On Sept 29,
2004, ALJ Cooke orally granted the Request of PG&E to extend the time to file
Reply Comments hereto to Oct 8, 2004. MMN]
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Joint Utilities Formal Strategy to close the Statewide Pricing Pilot for
Residential and Small Commercial customers.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 2004
|
Filed By:
ENERGY/CHAN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation - Nonparticipant Market
Survey Report.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Directs the utilities to file their preliminary analysis in this, or its
successor, docket, as set forth. The filing is due October 15, 2004. The
utilities shall file applications that finalize their analysis set forth, no
later than December 15, 2004.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 4, 2004
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Invites filing of Advice Letters to implement additional demand response
programs in Summer 2004.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 2004
|
Filed By:
ALJ/COOKE/PUC
|
|
Description:
approving 2004 schedule and plan for the statewide pricing pilot evaluation and
customer research activities and establishing process for evaluation of
proposed 2005 price responsive demand programs. Utilities shall file detailed
2005 program descriptions and budgets on October 15, 2004; comments on the
proposed programs shall be filed on November 5, 2004, with reply comments filed
November 16, 2004.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
On May 4, 2004, William Stock, Chief of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and
Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present
were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Thomas Bottorff, Senior Vice
President of Customer Service and Revenue, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of
Regulatory Relations, and Anlin Ting-Mason, Vice President of Business Systems
and Energy Programs, for PG&E. Bottorff stated that PG&E is continuing its
business case development. Bottorff noted that the Commission should decide
cost recovery issues concurrent with decisions regarding AMI deployment.
Ting-Mason stated that PG&E was concerned about the capacity value as well as
the additional demand reduction issues that the recent draft AMI Workshop
report suggested. Tomcala highlighted the fact that the process going forward
needs to be very focused so that the Commission can make a timely decision.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on staff's recommended analysis framework for business case analysis of
advanced metering infrastructure.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on draft report regarding recommended analysis framework for business case
analysis of advanced metering infrastructure.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES
|
|
Description:
on draft staff report on recommended framework for the business case analysis
of advanced metering infrastructure.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on staff draft report - Recommended analysis framework for the business case
analysis of advanced metering infrastructure.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 2004
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Modifications to Utility Demand Response Programs.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 2004
|
Filed By:
CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
Clarifies direction to utilities to implement the demand reserve partnership.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply; on utility demand response targets.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/REIGER/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; to the comments re modifications to demand response programs for 2004
and new programs for 2005, and working group 2 demand response program
evaluation filed April 8, 2004.
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to Comments of parties regarding its plan to achieve Demand Response Goals for
2004 and 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
reply; re PG&E's proposed modifications to demand response programs for 2004
and new programs for 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; on Comments addressing utility plans to achieve demand response goals.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 2004
|
Filed By:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
|
|
Description:
reply; on utility plans to achieve demand response goals.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 2004
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
reply; on March 31 plans proposing working group 2 program modifications
[pursuant to February 25, 2004 ruling].
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 2004
|
Filed By:
ENERGY/KANESHIRO/PUC
|
|
Description:
Errata to Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation filed April 13,
2004. [Filed per instructions from ALJ Cooke].
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 2004
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE
|
|
Description:
for acceptance of late-filed comments [on March 31 Plans Proposing Working
Group 2 Program Modifications]; comments attached.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/REIGER/PUC
|
|
Description:
regarding modifications to demand response programs for 2004, etc. [pursuant to
the February 25, 2004 ruling].
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on utility demand response targets.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on utility plans to achieve demand response goals.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on the Plan of PG&E and SDG&E to achieve Demand Response Goals for 2004 and
2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
on the March 31, 2004 utility filings re modifications to demand response
programs for 2004 and new programs for 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Monthly Report on demand Response programs.
|
|
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
April 20, 2004
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
ENERGY/CHAVEZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
[mailed 4/14/04]. DRAFT. Recommended analysis framework for the business case
analysis of advanced metering infrastructure.
|
|
|
Type:
REPORT
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 2004
|
Filed By:
ENERGY/KANESHIRO/PUC
|
|
Description:
Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation.
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
ORA/REIGER/CPUC
|
|
Description:
To the Comments of Parties on the ALJ's Ruling Seeking Input on Real-Time
Pricing Design Issues
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Reply Comments on the March 15, 2004 ALJ Ruling Seeking Input on Real-Time
Pricing Design Issues
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply Comments in Response to ALJ's Ruling Seeking Input on Real-Time Pricing
Design Issues
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
[pursuant to the November 24, 2003, and February 25, 2004, rulings] Plan
regarding modifications to demand response programs for 2004 and new programs
for 2005.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
in response to ALJ 's ruling seeking input on real time pricing.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; in response to ALJ Ruling seeking input on real-time pricing design
issues.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Plan to achieve demand response goals.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 2004
|
Filed By:
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; regarding the demand response targets adopted in R.03-06-032.
|
|
|