Commissioner Michael R. Peevey is the Assigned Commissioner and Robert Barnett is the assigned ALJ in this proceeding.
Findings of Fact
1. The PSA is not in the public interest and must be modified. The MSA is reasonable in light of the whole record, consistent with law and in the public interest.
2. On November 8, 2000, PG&E filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the five commissioners in their official capacity (the "Rate Recovery Litigation"). PG&E's complaint alleged that the Commission violated federal law by not allowing PG&E to collect in rates its costs of procuring wholesale energy. The Commission denied PG&E's allegations.
3. On April 6, 2001, PG&E filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and has been operating under Bankruptcy Court supervision and protection since that date.
4. On September 20, 2001, PG&E and PG&E Corporation, as co-proponents, proposed a plan of reorganization for PG&E in its Chapter 11 proceeding. That plan provided for the disaggregation of PG&E's historic businesses into four companies, three of which would be regulated by the FERC rather than this Commission, as a means of raising the money necessary to pay all valid creditor claims in full and exit Chapter 11.
5. On August 30, 2002, the Commission and the Official Creditors Committee filed a joint amended plan of reorganization for PG&E.
6. PG&E and the Commission have vigorously opposed and litigated against the plans proposed by each other.
7. Bankruptcy confirmation hearings on the competing plans of reorganization started on November 18, 2002, and were ongoing on March 11, 2003, when the Bankruptcy Court entered an order staying further confirmation and related proceedings for sixty days to facilitate a mandatory settlement process under the supervision of Bankruptcy Court Judge Randall Newsome. The stay was later extended to June 20, 2003.
8. On July 25, 2002 in PG&E's federal district court case against the Commission, U.S. District Judge Vaughan Walker denied the Commission's motion to dismiss and denied PG&E's and the Commission's motions for summary judgment. In the course of his ruling denying the motions, Judge Walker held that the federal filed rate doctrine applies to purchases of energy at market based rates, but he found that there were numerous factual disputes and he set the matter for trial. The federal district court case has been stayed by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pending the appeal by the Commission of the District Court's denial of a motion to dismiss.
9. In the PG&E's federal district court case and other proceedings, PG&E claims to be entitled to recover from ratepayers $11.8 billion of unrecovered costs of utility service. The Commission disputes this claim.
10. PG&E also claims to be entitled to retain $2.5 billion in wholesale power generation revenues collected from retail ratepayers for September 2000 through January 2001. The Commission disputes these claims.
11. In the ATCP, ORA claims that $434 million of costs of procuring power through the California Power Exchange should be disallowed as imprudently incurred. PG&E disputes ORA's claim.
12. On June 19, 2003, certain of the Commission's staff and PG&E announced that they had reached agreement on a proposed settlement that would resolve the competing plans of reorganization in the Bankruptcy Court, PG&E's case against the Commission in the U.S. District Court, and various pending Commission proceedings, all as set forth in the PSA.
13. There are substantial litigation risks to PG&E, the Commission, and ORA, and corresponding risks to ratepayers, in going to hearings on all issues and it is reasonable to approve a modification of a settlement that appropriately balances those risks.
14. PG&E has asserted claims, which total approximately $11.8 billion, and the ratepayer costs of the settlement ($7.2 billion), are about 60% of those claims. Ratepayers have also paid the remainder of these claims outside of the settlement process. In addition there are direct, positive benefits ratepayers will obtain. Those benefits include immediate rate reductions; the ability of the Commission to regulate PG&E on an integrated, cost-of-service basis; and environmental betterments. The ratepayer dollar settlement is fair and reasonable when compared to the claims PG&E would waive and release.
15. It is in the public interest that PG&E emerge from bankruptcy promptly.
16. To emerge from bankruptcy PG&E should pay its creditors. All allowed claims should be paid in full. PG&E Corp litigation costs, and PG&E shareholders owned gas hedging contract costs of $96 million, neither of which are related to claims of creditors, should not be paid by ratepayers. The dollar amount of the settlement, $7.0 billion, will achieve that result and is a reasonable compromise of the differences between PG&E and the Commission staff. The headroom revenue is part of the total revenue package which we find reasonable and in the public interest.
17. If this MSA is implemented, the initial revenue reduction in 2004 is projected to be approximately $ 400 million.
18. Paragraph 6 of the PSA is unreasonable and not in the public interest, because it requires the Commission not to restrict PG&E from paying dividends or repurchasing common stock, regardless of the circumstances, evidence or merit of any challenges to PG&E's dividend practices.
19. The MSA will result in a feasible plan to permit PG&E to emerge from bankruptcy.
20. The MSA is fair, just and reasonable and in the public interest. First, it adopts the regulatory asset and the cash allowances of the PSA except as delineated herein, and therefore will pay creditors in full, improving PG&E's credit metrics. Second, the MSA calls for the amortization of the regulatory asset "mortgage style" over five years. Third, it offers the State significant environmental benefits. Fourth, it provides for reduction of the regulatory asset by any refunds obtained from energy suppliers. Finally, it contains PG&E's commitment not to unilaterally disaggregate for the life of the plan.
21. On September 9, 2003, the ALJ encouraged the parties to resolve their differences with respect to the Land Conservation Commitment in Paragraph 17 and Appendix E to the PSA.
22. On September 25, 2003, PG&E, California Resources Agency, ORA, Association of California Water Agencies, California Farm Bureau Federation, California Hydropower Reform Coalition, Regional Council of Rural Counties, State Water Resources Control Board, Tuolumne Utility District, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service and non-parties California Forestry Association, California Wilderness Coalition, Central Valley Regional Water Control Board, Mountain Meadows Conservancy, Natural Resources Defense Council, Northern California Council Federation of Fly Fishers, The Pacific Forest Trust, Inc., Planning and Conservation League, Sierra Club California, Sierra Foothills Audobon Society, Sierra Nevada Alliance, Trust for Public Land and U.S. Department of Interior-Bureau of Land Management presented to the Commission a Stipulation Resolving Issues Regarding The Land Conservation Commitment (the "Land Commitment Stipulation") that implements Paragraph 17 and Appendix E of the PSA and constitutes an enforceable contract among those parties.
23. The Land Conservation Commitment Stipulation is reasonable in light of the whole record, consistent with law, and in the public interest.
24. Under the LCC, no lands will be transferred or encumbered unless PG&E first applies for and obtains approval from the Commission pursuant to § 851.
25. It is in the public interest for PG&E to provide $30 million for environmental enhancements benefiting ratepayers in its urban areas in addition to the $70 million of environmental enhancements, which PG&E has provided in the PSA (¶ 17) for rural areas.
26. It is in the public interest for PG&E to provide $30 million for clean energy technology.
27. TURN's proposal to use a securitized financing supported by a dedicated rate component cannot feasibly be done without express enabling legislation. To wait for legislation would entail unreasonable delay in resolving PG&E's Chapter 11 proceeding. Most of the savings claimed by TURN result from requiring PG&E to pay the taxes due on collections from ratepayers in violation of normal ratemaking principles.
Conclusions of Law
1. The PSA offered by PG&E and the Commission staff is unreasonable and not in the public interest unless it is modified. As modified herein, the MSA is reasonable in light of the whole record, consistent with law, and in the public interest (P.U. § 1701; Rules of Practice and Procedure § 51(c)).
2. When entering into the settlement agreements or contracts, the Commission may not act inconsistently with state law.
3. The Commission must strike the phrase "notwithstanding any contrary state law" in Paragraphs 21 and 32 of the PSA that provide that the Parties agree that the settlement agreement, the settlement plan and any court orders are intended to be binding and enforceable under federal law notwithstanding any contrary state law, because we can only enter into a settlement if it is consistent with state law.
4. In light of the constitutional requirement that the Commission actively supervise and regulate public utility rates and the statutory requirements under the §§451, 454, 728 that the Commission ensure that the public utilities' rates are just and reasonable, the Commission must retain its authority to set just and reasonable rates during the term of the settlement .
5. The Commission cannot be powerless to protect PG&E's ratepayers from unjust and unreasonable rates or practices during the term of the proposed settlement.
6. The government may not contract away its right to exercise the police power in the future.
7. Entering into the Modified Settlement Agreement (MSA) is fully consistent with the Commission's exercise of its ratemaking authority, because we find that the regulatory asset provision is reasonable and a necessary part of the settlement, and we will still decide the overall retail electric rates for PG&E's customers in pending and future proceedings.
8. Paragraph 6 of the PSA is unreasonable and contrary to the public interest, because it would restrict the Commission from ruling against PG&E concerning allegations of unreasonable dividend or stock repurchasing practices even though we do not have a record in this proceeding to support whether future dividend practices or stock repurchasing practices are reasonable or unreasonable.
9. Paragraph 2.g.'s commitment that the Commission will act to facilitate and maintain the investment grade credit ratings does not guarantee such a credit rating when there are other causes, besides the Commission's actions (e.g., PG&E's imprudent conduct resulting in a disallowance), which are responsible for any threats to PG&E's investment grade credit rating.
10. The Bankruptcy Court has jurisdiction over the plan of reorganization and over the parties to enforce the settlement agreement, settlement plan and the Court's own confirmation order, as well as jurisdiction over the implementation of the bankruptcy plan.
11. AB 6X made § 368(a) inapplicable to the utilities' unrecovered costs, and it is clear that the Commission's authority to allow PG&E to recover the balance in its TCBA is not limited by AB 1890.
12. TURN's proposed securitization financing cannot be achieved without legislation.
13. The MSA (the "Settlement Agreement" in Appendix C of this order) is not contrary to state law and is fair, just and reasonable and in the public interest; therefore, it should be approved and adopted.
14. The rulings of the presiding Administrative Law Judge are affirmed.
15. The Commission has inherent authority under the California Constitution and Public Utilities Code §§ 451 and 701 to enter into and execute a settlement agreement.
16. The Commission has authority under Public Utilities Code § 701 and Rule 51 to approve the Land Conservation Commitment (LCC) Stipulation.
17. Under the LCC, the Commission retains its existing authority under § 851 to approve or disapprove of any proposed disposition or encumbrance of PG&E's property.
18. Should PG&E agree to the Modified Settlement Agreement and the Bankrutcy Court approve it as part of the settlement plan, the Modified Settlement Agreement will be binding upon future Commissions.
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Proposed Settlement Agreement offered by PG&E and the Commission staff is modified by deleting Paragraph 6 ("Dividend Payments and Stock Repurchases modifying paragraph 2(g) to add a mutual commitment of PG&E, omitting any reference to payment by ratepayers directly or indirectly of bankruptcy-related costs for PG&E or Corp, deleting the phrase "notwithstanding any contrary state law" in Paragraphs 21 and 32, adding $30 million of environmental benefits for PG&E's urban ratepayers, and adding $15 million to assure adequate planning and funding of clean energy technology.
2. The Proposed Settlement Agreement is also modified, as discussed herein, by reducing the amortization period of the regulatory asset from nine years to five years
3. PG&E shall file an Advice Letter to propose to provide ratepayers with the present value of $96 million of shareholder-owned gas hedging contract costs.
4. PG&E shall file an Advice Letter to state actual cash on hand as compared to forecasted cash on hand in the PSA, and propose to adjust rates to reflect actual cash on hand. The cash on hand shall not include any reimbursement from PG&E to PG&E Corporation for PG&E Corporation's bankruptcy -related consulting and litigation fees or costs.F
5. The Modified Settlement Agreement (the "Settlement Agreement" in Appendix C) is approved and adopted by the Commission.
6. The rulings of the Presiding Administrative Law Judge are affirmed.
7. The Land Conservation Commitment Stipulation in Exhibit 181 is approved and adopted, as modified herein.
The Commission authorizes the Executive Director to sign the Modified Settlement Agreement (the "Settlement Agreement" in Appendix C) on behalf of the Commission.
SEE ALJ PD FOR APPENDIX A
MODIFIED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), PG&E Corporation (the "Parent" or "PG&E Corporation") (PG&E and PG&E Corporation are collectively referred to as the "PG&E Proponents"), and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, as of ___________, 2003 (each of which is individually referred to as a "Party," and collectively as the "Parties")
A. On April 6, 2001, PG&E filed a voluntary case under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, Case No. 01-30923 DM (the "Chapter 11 Case"), pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California (the "Court").
B. The PG&E Proponents filed a Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for Pacific Gas and Electric Company, dated April 19, 2002, as Modified by Modifications Dated July 9, 2002, October 18, 2002, December 13, 2002, December 26, 2002, February 21, 2003, February 24, 2003, and May 22, 2003 (the "PG&E Plan").
C. On April 15, 2002, the Commission filed its original plan of reorganization for PG&E. Subsequently, the Commission and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "OCC") appointed in the Chapter 11 Case filed a Second Amended Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for Pacific Gas and Electric Company, dated November 6, 2002. Then, on December 5, 2002, the Commission and the OCC filed their Third Amended Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the "Commission Plan").
D. The Court began trial on the competing plans of reorganization on November 18, 2002. During the trial on the PG&E Plan, the Court entered an order staying further confirmation and related proceedings for 60 days to facilitate a mandatory settlement process before the Honorable Randall J. Newsome, Bankruptcy Judge. On April 23, 2003, at the request of Judge Newsome, the Court issued an order staying further confirmation and related proceedings for an additional 30 days. On June 9, 2003, the Court issued an order staying further confirmation and related proceedings for an additional four days, with a status conference scheduled for June 20, 2003.
E. Neither PG&E nor PG&E Corporation has declared or paid any dividends to holders of their common stock since October 2000, and are agreeing in this Agreement not to do so before July 1, 2004. As a result, PG&E's and PG&E Corporation's shareholders have foregone and will forego dividends of approximately $1.7 billion.
F. The Parties desire to settle their differences with respect to the competing plans of reorganization and the other matters specified herein, and to jointly support a plan of reorganization for PG&E (the "Settlement Plan"), all as set forth more specifically below.
G. In the exercise of its police and regulatory powers, the Commission is entering into this Agreement and shall adopt such decisions and orders as necessary to implement and carry out the provisions of this Agreement, including but not limited to, establishing Retail Electric Rates to provide for payment in full of the Securities and the Regulatory Asset (each as defined below) in accordance with their respective terms.
Statement of Intent
(1) The Parties recognize that reliable electric and gas service is of the utmost importance to the safety, health, and welfare of California's citizenry and economy.
(2) The Parties expect that under the Settlement Plan, Retail Electric Rates (as defined below) will be reduced on January 1, 2004, with further reductions expected thereafter.
(3) As part of this Agreement, the PG&E Proponents will withdraw the PG&E Plan and no longer propose to disaggregate the historic businesses of PG&E. Instead, PG&E will remain a vertically-integrated utility subject to the Commission's jurisdiction to regulate in the public interest. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, the Settlement Plan, and the Confirmation Order (as defined below), PG&E shall continue to be regulated by the Commission in accordance with the Commission's policies and practices and the laws and regulations applicable to similarly situated investor-owned utilities in the State of California.
(4) The Parties enter into this settlement to enable PG&E to emerge from Chapter 11 and fully resume its traditional role of providing safe and reliable electric and gas service at just and reasonable rates, subject to Commission regulation.
(5) It is in the public interest to restore PG&E to financial health and to maintain and improve PG&E's financial health in the future to ensure that PG&E is able to provide safe and reliable electric and gas service to its customers at just and reasonable rates. The Parties intend that PG&E emerge from Chapter 11 as soon as possible with a Company Credit Rating of Investment Grade and that PG&E's Company Credit Rating will improve over time. Investment Grade Company Credit Ratings are necessary for PG&E to emerge from Chapter 11 and will directly benefit PG&E's ratepayers by reducing the cost of the financings (i) required for emergence and (ii) required to fund future operations and capital expenditures. In order to help accomplish these goals, it is fair and in the public interest to allow PG&E to recover, over a reasonable time, prior uncollected costs and to provide the opportunity for PG&E's shareholders to earn a reasonable rate of return on PG&E's utility business, all as described herein.
(6) Among other things, as part of this Agreement, PG&E will release claims against the Commission that would have been retained by PG&E or its Parent under the PG&E Plan. In lieu of those claims and the value that PG&E's shareholders would have received from the transactions provided for under the PG&E Plan, PG&E's shareholders will receive value over nine years through this Agreement, the Settlement Plan and the Confirmation Order (as defined below), including amortization of the Regulatory Asset as provided for herein.
(7) The Commission acknowledges and agrees that the benefit of this Agreement to PG&E's shareholders requires that the Commission provide timely and full recovery of PG&E's reasonable costs of providing utility service, including return of and return on investment in utility plant and recovery of operating expenses, including power procurement costs, over the full five-year amortization period of the Regulatory Asset. The Commission intends to provide PG&E with the opportunity to recover all of its prudently incurred costs as well as a return of and return on its investment in utility plant. The Commission also intends that any operational mandate it imposes that requires PG&E to expend funds or incur costs, including demand reduction or energy conservation programs, include a timely rate recovery mechanism for the costs of such mandate.
In consideration of the respective covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Definitions. When used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
a. "96C Bonds" means those certain Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds (Pacific Gas and Electric) 1996 Series C issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority in the aggregate principal amount of $200,000,000.
b. "96E Bonds" means those certain Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds (Pacific Gas and Electric) 1996 Series E issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority in the aggregate principal amount of $165,000,000.
c. "96F Bonds" means those certain Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds (Pacific Gas and Electric) 1996 Series F issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000.
d. "97B Bonds" means those certain Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds (Pacific Gas and Electric) 1997 Series B issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority in the aggregate principal amount of $148,550,000.
e. "Administrative Expense Claim" means a Claim against PG&E constituting a cost or expense of administration of the Chapter 11 Case under sections 503(b) and 507(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, and any fees or charges assessed against the estate of PG&E under section 1930 of chapter 123 of title 28 of the United States Code.
f. "Agreement" has the meaning set forth in the introduction.
g. "ATCP Application" means PG&E's Annual Transition Cost Proceeding, Application No. 01-09-003, presently pending before the Commission.
h. "Business Day" means any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or any other day on which commercial banks in San Francisco, California, or New York, New York, are required or authorized to close by law or executive order.
i. "Carizzo Plains" has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 17.
j. "Cash" means legal tender of the United States.
k. "Cause of Action" means, without limitation, any and all actions, causes of action, liabilities, obligations, rights, suits, damages, judgments, claims and demands whatsoever, whether known or unknown, existing or hereafter arising, in law, equity or otherwise, based in whole or in part upon any act or omission or other event occurring prior to April 6, 2001 or during the course of the Chapter 11 Case, including through the Effective Date.
l. "Chapter 11 Case" has the meaning set forth in Recital A.
m. "Commission" means the California Public Utilities Commission, or any successor agency, and the commissioners thereof in their official capacities and their respective successors.
n. "Commission-DWR Rate Agreement" means the agreement dated March 8, 2002, between the Commission and DWR relating to the establishment of DWR's revenue requirements and charges in connection with power sold by DWR under Division 27, commencing with section 80000, of the California Water Code.
o. "Commission Plan" has the meaning set forth in Recital C.
p. "Company Credit Rating" means a long-term issuer credit rating from S&P and an issuer rating from Moody's.
q. "Confirmation Order" means the order of the Court confirming the Settlement Plan pursuant to section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.
r. "Court" has the meaning set forth in Recital A.
s. "DWR" means the California Department of Water Resources.
t. "DWR Contracts" means the contracts entered into by DWR for the purchase of electric power and associated goods and services pursuant to California Assembly Bill No. 1X, signed into law by the Governor on February 1, 2001.
u. "Effective Date" means the date designated in the Settlement Plan as the Effective Date.
v. "ESP" means energy service provider.
w. "FERC" means the United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
x. "Fixed Transition Amount" has the meaning set forth in section 840(d) of the Public Utilities Code.
y. "Forecast Average Equity Ratio" means the proportion of equity in the forecast of PG&E's average capital structure for calendar year 2004 and 2005 to be filed by PG&E in its 2003 cost of capital proceeding, Application No. 02-05-022, and its 2005 cost of capital proceeding, respectively, or such other CPUC proceedings as may be appropriate.
z. "Headroom" means PG&E's total net after-tax income reported under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, less earnings from operations, plus after-tax amounts accrued for bankruptcy-related administration and bankruptcy-related interest costs, all multiplied by 1.67, provided that the calculation will reflect the outcome of PG&E's 2003 general rate case (A.02-09-005 and A.02-11-067).
aa. "Investment Grade" means both a credit rating from S&P of BBB- or better and a credit rating from Moody's of Baa3 or better.
bb. "Land Conservation Commitment" has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 17a.
cc. "Letter of Credit Backed PC Bonds" means, collectively, any series of 96C Bonds, 96E Bonds, 96F Bonds and/or 97B Bonds that are outstanding as of the Effective Date.
dd. "Long-Term Notes" means the long-term notes proposed to be issued to creditors pursuant to the PG&E Plan.
ee. "MBIA Insured PC Bonds" means those certain Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds (Pacific Gas and Electric Company) 1996 Series A issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority in the aggregate principal amount of $200,000,000.
ff. "Moody's" means Moody's Investor's Service Inc.
gg. "NRC" means the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
hh. "OCC" has the meaning set forth in Recital C.
ii. "Parent" has the meaning set forth in the introduction.
jj. "Person" has the meaning set forth in section 101(41) of the Bankruptcy Code.
kk. "PG&E Plan" has the meaning set forth in Recital B.
ll. "Preferred Stock" means the issued and outstanding shares of PG&E's First Preferred Stock, par value $25.00 per share. PG&E's First Preferred Stock comprises: (a) 6% Non-Redeemable First Preferred; (b) 5.5% Non-Redeemable First Preferred; (c) 5% Non-Redeemable First Preferred; (d) 5% Redeemable First Preferred Series D; (e) 5% Redeemable First Preferred Series E; (f) 4.80% Redeemable First Preferred; (g) 4.50% Redeemable First Preferred; (h) 4.36% Redeemable First Preferred; (i) 6.57% Redeemable First Preferred; (j) 7.04% Redeemable First Preferred; and (k) 6.30% Redeemable First Preferred.
mm. "QFs" means qualifying facilities operating pursuant to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 and related regulations enacted thereunder.
nn. "Rate Recovery Litigation" means Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Plaintiff, v. Loretta M. Lynch, et al., Defendants, Case No. C-01-3023-VRW, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and all appellate proceedings arising therefrom.
oo. "Rate Reduction Bonds" has the meaning set forth in section 840(e) of the Public Utilities Code.
pp. "Regulatory Asset" has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 2.
qq. "Retail Electric Rates" means any and all charges authorized by the Commission to be collected from PG&E's retail electric customers.
rr. "ROE" has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 2b.
ss. "S&P" means Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
tt. "SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
uu. "Securities" means the debt and Preferred Stock to be issued or reinstated by PG&E, as the case may be, in accordance with the Settlement Plan, from time to time, including any and all interest thereon or associated costs as provided under such debt or Preferred Stock instruments, agreements or certificates.
vv. "Settlement Plan" has the meaning set forth in Recital F.
ww. "State" means the State of California.
xx. "Tax Tracking Account" has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 2c.
yy. "TCBA" means Transition Cost Balancing Account.
zz. "URG" means utility retained generation.
aaa. "URG Rate Base" means the rate base amounts set forth in PG&E Advice Letter 2233-E implementing Commission Decision (D.) No. 02-04-016.
bbb. "Watershed Lands" has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 17.
2. Regulatory Asset. The Commission shall establish a regulatory asset of Two Billion Two Hundred and Ten Million Dollars ($2,210,000,000) as a new, separate and additional part of PG&E's rate base (the "Regulatory Asset").
a. The Regulatory Asset shall be amortized in PG&E's Retail Electric Rates on a "mortgage-style" basis over five years starting on January 1, 2004. The details and mechanics of the amortization and earnings of the Regulatory Asset shall be similar to as set forth in Appendix A, Technical Appendix, jointly prepared by the Commission and PG&E.
b. The Regulatory Asset shall earn PG&E's authorized return on equity ("ROE") on the equity component of PG&E's capital structure as set in PG&E's annual cost of capital proceedings, provided that the ROE on the Regulatory Asset shall be no less than 11.22 percent per year for the life of the Regulatory Asset and that, once the equity component of PG&E's capital structure reaches 52 percent, the authorized equity component for the Regulatory Asset shall be no less than 52 percent for the life of the Regulatory Asset.
c. The Commission will use its usual methodology for tax-effecting the ROE component for purposes of setting PG&E's revenue requirements associated with the unamortized portion of the Regulatory Asset. The Commission will apply the same method of tax-effecting to the scheduled amortization of the Regulatory Asset. The Commission shall authorize PG&E to establish a Tax Tracking Account to be used as follows: In the event that it is finally determined that PG&E is required to pay income taxes on the Regulatory Asset any earlier than the Regulatory Asset is amortized pursuant to Paragraph 2a, PG&E shall record in the Tax Tracking Account the difference between (1) the taxes incurred on account of the Regulatory Asset plus any interest imposed by the federal or state taxing authorities with respect to such earlier recognition of taxable income and (2) the taxes that would have been incurred on account of the Regulatory Asset had it been subject to tax as it was amortized pursuant to Paragraph 2a. The Tax Tracking Account shall earn PG&E's authorized rate of return in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 2b. PG&E shall amortize the Tax Tracking Account in Retail Electric rates over the greater of the remaining life of the Regulatory Asset or five years.
d. PG&E shall continue to cooperate with the Commission and the State in seeking refunds from generators and other energy suppliers. The net after-tax amount of any refunds, claim offsets or other credits from generators or other energy suppliers relating to PG&E's PX, ISO, QF or ESP costs that PG&E actually realizes in Cash or by offset of creditor claims in the Chapter 11 Case shall be applied by PG&E to reduce the outstanding balance of the Regulatory Asset dollar for dollar. To the extent that any consideration actually received by PG&E in Cash under the Master Settlement Agreement that resolves the litigation in Public Utilities Commission of California v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., et al., FERC Docket No. RP00-241-000, et al., and related litigation in state and federal courts, is in settlement of damages claimed by PG&E that caused PG&E to incur high costs of electricity from March 1, 2000 to date, PG&E shall apply the net after-tax amount of such consideration to reduce the outstanding balance of the Regulatory Asset dollar for dollar, provided that such a reduction is consistent with the rules or orders adopted by the Commission concerning the consideration paid by El Paso under the Master Settlement Agreement. These reductions shall reduce the remaining amortization of the Regulatory Asset, as set forth in Appendix A, Technical Appendix.
e. Balances in PG&E's TCBA, determined in accordance with Commission Decision No. 01-03-082, as of January 1, 2004 shall have no further impact on PG&E's Retail Electric Rates and shall be subject to no further review by the Commission except for verification of recorded balances, and PG&E's current Retail Electric Rates will be replaced by the Retail Electric Rates resulting from this Agreement, the Settlement Plan and the Confirmation Order as of January 1, 2004. This is not intended to affect PG&E's pending application (Application No. 00-07-013) to recover electric restructuring costs booked into the Electric Restructuring Cost Account pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 376 or to otherwise affect recovery of QF and other nonbypassable costs going forward.
f. The Commission agrees that PG&E should receive the benefit of this Agreement over the entire life of the Regulatory Asset. To ensure this, the Commission agrees that the URG Rate Base for PG&E already established by the Commission in D.02-04-016 shall be deemed just and reasonable and not subject to modification, adjustment or reduction, except as necessary to reflect capital expenditures and any change in authorized depreciation. (This shall not preclude the Commission from determining the reasonableness of any capital expenditures made on URG after the Effective Date.) The Commission further agrees that it shall not in any way reduce or impair the value of the Regulatory Asset or the URG Rate Base by taking the Regulatory Asset or the URG Rate Base, their amortization or earnings into account when setting other revenue requirements and resulting rates for PG&E. Nor shall the Commission take this Agreement or the Regulatory Asset into account in establishing PG&E's authorized ROE or capital structure.
g. The Commission recognizes that the establishment, maintenance and improvement of Investment Grade Company Credit Ratings is vital for PG&E to be able to continue to provide safe and reliable service to its customers. The Commission further recognizes that the establishment, maintenance and improvement of PG&E's Investment Grade Company Credit Ratings directly benefits PG&E's ratepayers by reducing PG&E's immediate and future borrowing costs, which, in turn, will allow PG&E to finance its operations and make capital expenditures on its distribution, transmission, and generation assets at lower cost to its ratepayers. In furtherance of these objectives, the Commission agrees to act to facilitate and maintain Investment Grade Company Credit Ratings for PG&E.
h. As part of ensuring that PG&E has the opportunity to recover all its prudently incurred costs of providing service, including return of and return on utility investment, the Commission agrees that it shall timely act upon PG&E's applications to collect in rates its prudently incurred costs (including return of and return on) of any new, reasonable investment in utility plant and assets.
i. The Commission shall promptly adjust PG&E's rates consistent with AB 57/SB 1976 and the Commission-DWR Rate Agreement to ensure that PG&E's collection of the following is not impaired: (1) Fixed Transition Amount to service existing Rate Reduction Bonds; (2) Regulatory Asset amortization and return; and (3) base revenue requirements (e.g., electric and gas distribution, URG, gas commodity procurement, existing QF contract costs and associated return).
j. The Commission agrees that, in the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, PG&E's expected regulatory outcomes and financial performance should be similar to those of the other investor-owned energy utilities in California under similar circumstances. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Commission shall not discriminate against PG&E by reason of the Chapter 11 Case, the Rate Recovery Litigation, this Agreement, the Regulatory Asset or any other matters addressed or resolved herein.
3. Ratemaking Matters.
a. The Commission agrees to maintain PG&E's Retail Electric Rates at current levels through December 31, 2003. As of January 1, 2004, the Commission may adjust PG&E's Retail Electric Rates prospectively consistent with this Agreement, the Settlement Plan, the Confirmation Order and California law.
b. The Commission shall set PG&E's capital structure and authorized ROE in PG&E's annual cost of capital proceedings in its usual manner; provided that, from January 1, 2004 until either S&P confers on PG&E a Company Credit Rating of at least "A-" or Moody's confers on PG&E a Company Credit Rating of at least "A3," the authorized ROE shall be no less than 11.22 percent per year and the authorized equity ratio for ratemaking purposes shall be no less than 52 percent, except for a transition period as provided below. The Commission recognizes that, at the Effective Date, PG&E's capital structure will likely not contain 52 percent equity. Accordingly, for 2004 and 2005, the authorized equity ratio shall equal the Forecast Average Equity Ratio, but in no event shall it be less than 48.6 percent. PG&E agrees not to pay any dividend on common stock before July 1, 2004.
c. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create a rate freeze or rate cap for PG&E's electric or gas business.
4. Implementation of Ratemaking. To ensure that all conditions to the Effective Date are met as soon as possible following issuance of the Confirmation Order, as soon as practicable after the Commission decision approving this Agreement, PG&E shall file an advice letter to implement all the rate and tariff changes necessary to implement the Settlement Plan. The Commission shall act promptly on the advice filing and revised rates and tariffs. The Commission shall also review and issue a decision promptly on the merits of any application for rehearing of the approval of the advice filing.
5. Timely Decisions on Ratemaking Matters. The Commission and PG&E agree that timely applications by PG&E and timely action by the Commission on such applications are essential to the achievement of the objectives of this settlement. The Commission agrees that it will promptly act on the pending PG&E ratemaking proceedings listed in Appendix B hereto.
6. [Intentionally Omitted]
7. DWR Contracts. If the Commission desires it, PG&E agrees to accept an assignment of or to assume legal and financial responsibility for the DWR Contracts, provided that (a) PG&E's Company Credit Rating, after giving effect to such assignment or assumption, shall be no less than "A" from S&P and "A2" from Moody's; (b) the Commission shall first have made a finding that, for purposes of assignment or assumption, the DWR Contracts to be assigned or assumed are just and reasonable; and (c) the Commission shall have acted to ensure that PG&E will receive full and timely recovery in its Retail Electric Rates of all costs of such DWR Contracts over their life without further review. The Commission agrees not to require PG&E to assume or accept an assignment of legal or financial responsibility for the DWR Contracts unless conditions (a), (b) and (c) are all met. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the discretion of the Commission to review the prudence of PG&E's administration and dispatch of the DWR Contracts, consistent with applicable law.
8. Headroom Revenues.
a. The Commission acknowledges and agrees that the Headroom, surcharge, and base revenues accrued or collected by PG&E through and including December 31, 2003 are property of PG&E's Chapter 11 estate, have been or will be used for utility purposes, including to pay creditors in the Chapter 11 Case, have been included in PG&E's Retail Electric Rates consistent with state and federal law, and are not subject to refund.
b. The Headroom revenues accrued by PG&E during calendar year 2003 shall not exceed $775 million, on a pre-tax basis. If the amount of Headroom PG&E accrues in 2003 is greater or less than thisamount, the Commission shall take such action in 2004 as is necessary to require PG&E to refund any Headroom accrued in excess of $775 million or, if the accrued Headroom is less than $775 million, to allow PG&E to collect in rates the difference between the Headroom accrued and $775 million.
9. Dismissal of the Rate Recovery and Other Litigation. On or as soon as practicable after the later of the Effective Date or the date on which the Commission approval of this Agreement is no longer subject to appeal, PG&E shall dismiss with prejudice the Rate Recovery Litigation, foregoing any recovery from ratepayers of costs sought in such litigation not otherwise provided for in this Agreement and the Settlement Plan; withdraw the PG&E Plan; dismiss other pending proceedings, as specified herein; and provide the other consideration described herein. In exchange, on or before January 1, 2004, the Commission shall establish and authorize the collection of the Regulatory Asset and the URG Rate Base, and on or as soon as practicable after the Effective Date, the Commission shall resolve Phase 2 of the presently pending ATCP Application with no adverse impact on PG&E's cost recovery as filed, and provide the other consideration described herein. PG&E's motion to dismiss the Rate Recovery Litigation shall be in form and substance satisfactory to the Commission.
10. Dismissal of Other Proceedings. On or as soon as practicable after the later of the Effective Date or the date on which the Commission approval of this Agreement is no longer subject to appeal, PG&E and PG&E Corporation, on the one hand, and the Commission, on the other, will execute full mutual releases and dismissals with prejudice of all claims, actions or regulatory proceedings arising out of or related in any way to the energy crisis or the implementation of A.B. 1890 listed on Appendix C hereto. All such releases and dismissals with prejudice shall be in form and substance satisfactory to PG&E, PG&E Corporation and the Commission.
11. Withdrawal of Certain Applications.
a. Promptly upon the Effective Date, PG&E shall withdraw all of its applications previously filed with the FERC, the NRC, the SEC and elsewhere in connection with the PG&E Plan. A full and complete list of such applications is set forth in Appendix D hereto. Upon execution of this Agreement, PG&E and PG&E Corporation shall move to obtain or otherwise request a stay of all actions before the FERC, NRC, SEC or a similar agency initiated by PG&E and/or PG&E Corporation to implement the PG&E Plan. In addition, upon execution of this Agreement by all Parties, PG&E and PG&E Corporation shall suspend all actions to obtain or transfer licenses, permits and franchises to implement the PG&E Plan. On the Effective Date or as soon thereafter as practicable, PG&E and PG&E Corporation shall withdraw or abandon all such applications for licenses, permits and franchises.
b. In addition to withdrawing its pending applications at FERC, PG&E and PG&E Corporation agree that, for the life of the Regulatory Asset, neither they nor any of their affiliates or subsidiaries will make any filing under Sections 4, 5 or 7 of the Natural Gas Act to transfer ownership of or ratemaking jurisdiction over PG&E's intrastate natural gas pipeline and storage facilities, and to keep such natural gas pipeline and storage facilities subject to the regulation of the Commission. In addition, PG&E and PG&E Corporation agree that the Commission has jurisdiction under existing Public Utilities Code section 851 to review and approve any proposal by PG&E to dispose of property necessary or useful in the performance of PG&E's duties to the public.
12. Interest Rate Hedging. In order to take advantage of the current favorable interest-rate climate, the Commission agrees that the actual reasonable cost of PG&E's interest rate hedging activities with respect to the financing necessary for the Settlement Plan shall be reflected and recoverable in PG&E's retail gas and electric rates without further review.
a. It is anticipated that all of PG&E's existing trade and financial debt, except for the MBIA Insured PC Bonds and the Letter of Credit Backed PC Bonds, shall be paid in Cash under the Settlement Plan. It is further anticipated that the MBIA Insured PC Bonds, the Letter of Credit Backed PC Bonds and the Preferred Stock shall be reinstated under the Settlement Plan. The Settlement Plan will detail the proposed financing and creditor treatment.
b. The financing of the Settlement Plan shall not include any new preferred or common stock.
c. All financing shall be arranged and placed by a financing team led by PG&E that includes representatives of the Commission and PG&E and shall be duly authorized by the Commission and subject to the authority and duty of the boards of directors of PG&E and PG&E Corporation to approve such financing. The financing shall be designed and accomplished so as to minimize the cost to ratepayers consistent with achieving an appropriate and financially flexible capital structure.
d. In consideration for the agreement by UBS Warburg LLC and Lehman Brothers each to (i) limit its consummation and/or advisory fee to $20 million (in the case of Lehman Brothers inclusive of advisory fees already paid by PG&E Corporation and further subject to the crediting provisions contained in Lehman Brothers' engagement letter, and, in the case of UBS Warburg LLC, in lieu of the full consummation fee calculated pursuant to section 2(d) of UBS Warburg LLC's engagement letter with the Commission and the OCC), which shall be payable on the Effective Date, and (ii) jointly provide the bank facilities determined by PG&E to be necessary under the Settlement Plan (subject to negotiation of satisfactory terms and conditions), PG&E agrees to name UBS Warburg LLC and Lehman Brothers as exclusive book runners, lead managers and hedging providers of all financings pursuant to the Settlement Plan with equal economics for 80 percent of the aggregate of total fees and commissions payable on such financings, and otherwise on customary terms as agreed among them. To the extent that PG&E adds co-managers, the Commission shall have the right to appoint one additional co-manager at the highest level of economics available to co-managers.
e. All documents used or prepared by PG&E in connection with the financing, including prospectuses, indentures and notes, shall be in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Commission.
f. The cost of the financing, including principal, interest, any fees or discounts payable to investment bankers, capital markets arrangers or book runners, including the fees to be paid to UBS Warburg LLC and Lehman Brothers pursuant to Paragraph 13d, as well as any past or future call premiums on reacquired debt, shall be fully recoverable as part of the cost of debt to be collected in PG&E's retail gas and electric rates without further review.
14. Treatment of Creditors. The treatment of creditors under the Settlement Plan will be consistent with that provided in the PG&E Plan, except that those creditors that were to receive Long-Term Notes or a combination of Cash and Long-Term Notes will be paid entirely in Cash.
15. Fees and Expenses. As of the Confirmation Date, and pursuant to the Settlement Plan and the Confirmation Order, PG&E shall reimburse PG&E Corporation and the Commission for all of their respective professional fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Chapter 11 Case (such fees and expenses of the Commission to include those of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, UBS Warburg LLC and Chanin Capital Partners), without the need for any application under Section 330 or 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. If it is determined by court order that such an application is required for all or any part of such fees and expenses, then the Parties shall support such application in a written pleading to be filed with the Court and such fees and expenses shall be allowed and treated as an Administrative Expense Claim under the Settlement Plan in the amount approved by the Court. The Commission shall authorize PG&E to recover the amounts so paid or reimbursed to the Commission in retail rates over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed four years. PG&E shall not recover any portion of the amounts so paid or reimbursed to PG&E Corporation in retail rates; rather, such costs shall be borne solely by shareholders through a reduction in retained earnings.
16. Conditions Precedent to Effective Date. Among other conditions to be contained in the Settlement Plan, the following shall be conditions precedent to the Effective Date:
a. S&P and Moody's shall have issued Investment Grade Company Credit Ratings for PG&E.
b. The Commission shall have given final, nonappealable approval for all rates, tariffs and agreements necessary to implement the Settlement Plan. The PG&E Proponents shall have the right to waive this provision with respect to any appeal from the Commission's approvals.
17. Preservation and Environmental Enhancement of PG&E Land. PG&E owns approximately 140,000 acres of watershed lands ("Watershed Lands") associated with its hydroelectric generating system and the approximately 655 acre Carizzo Plains property in San Luis Obispo County ("Carizzo Plains"). Of the Watershed Lands, approximately 95,000 acres are lands that are either included in the project boundaries, contain essential project elements related to the operations of the hydro facilities, or are part of legal parcels that contain major FERC project facilities. The remaining 44,000 acres are lands completely outside the FERC project boundaries and do not contain FERC project features. The Watershed Lands and Carizzo Plains are worth an estimated $300 million.
a. PG&E agrees to the land conservation commitment set forth in Appendix E hereto, by which the Watershed Lands and Carizzo Plains will be subject to conservation easements or donated in fee simple to public agencies or non-profit conservation organizations ("Land Conservation Commitment").
b. On the Effective Date or as soon thereafter as practicable, PG&E shall establish PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation, a California non-profit corporation, to oversee the Land Conservation Commitment and to carry out environmental enhancement activities. The governing board of PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation will consist of one representative each from PG&E, the Commission, the California Department of Fish and Game, the State Water Resources Control Board, the California Farm Bureau Federation, and three public members to be named by the Commission. The Commission shall retain its regulatory power over ratepayer funds paid by PG&E into the EEC and LCC.
c. PG&E shall fund PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation with $100 million in Cash: $70 million of which will cover administrative expenses and the costs of environmental enhancements to the Watershed Lands and Carizzo Plains, provided that no such enhancement may at any time interfere with PG&E's hydroelectric operations, maintenance or capital improvements; and $30 million of which will be dedicated to the Environmental Opportunity for Urban Youth Program. The funds, subject to Commission review, will be paid in equal installments over ten years on the Effective Date and on January 2 of each year thereafter. The Commission shall authorize PG&E to recover these payments in retail rates without further review.
18. Clean Energy Technology Commitment.
a. On the Effective Date or as soon thereafter as practicable, PG&E shall establish a new, California non-profit corporation dedicated to supporting research and investment in clean energy technologies primarily in PG&E's service territory. The non-profit corporation will be governed by a board consisting of nine members, three each appointed by the Commission and PG&E, and the remaining three to be selected jointly by the Commission appointees and the PG&E appointees.
b. PG&E shall fund the non-profit corporation with $30 million in Cash paid over five years, as follows: $2 million in the first year, $4 million in the second year, $6 million in the third year, $8 million in the fourth year, and $10 million in the fifth year, each amount payable on January 2 of each year after the Effective Date. The Commission shall not include any portion of this funding in PG&E's retail rates.
c. PG&E and the Commission shall work together to attract additional funding for the non-profit corporation.
19. Cooperation. The Parties will cooperate fully and in good faith to obtain timely confirmation of the Settlement Plan and to effectuate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Settlement Plan. The Parties will support this Agreement, the Settlement Plan, and the Confirmation Order in all judicial, administrative and legislative forums. PG&E, PG&E Corporation and the Commission will cooperate in all presentations to credit rating agencies in connection with the consummation of the Settlement Plan.
20. Waiver of Sovereign Immunity. In connection with any action or proceeding concerning the enforcement of this Agreement, the Settlement Plan or the Confirmation Order or other determination of the Parties' rights under this Agreement, the Settlement Plan or the Confirmation Order, the Commission hereby knowingly and expressly waives all existing and future rights of sovereign immunity, and all other similar immunities, as a defense. Accordingly, the Commission hereby consents to the jurisdiction of any court or other tribunal or forum for such actions or proceedings including, but not limited to, the Court. This waiver is irrevocable and applies to the jurisdiction of any court, legal process, suit, judgment, attachment in aid of execution of a judgment, attachment prior to judgment, set-off or any other legal process with respect to the enforcement of this Agreement, the Settlement Plan or the Confirmation Order or other determination of the Parties' rights under this Agreement, the Settlement Plan or Confirmation Order. It is the intention of this Agreement that neither the Commission nor any other California entity acting on the Commission's behalf may assert immunity in an action or proceeding, as discussed herein, concerning the Parties' rights under this Agreement, the Settlement Plan or the Confirmation Order.
21. Validity and Binding Effect. The Parties agree not to contest the validity and enforceability of this Agreement, the Settlement Plan or any order entered by the Court contemplated by or required to implement this Agreement and the Settlement Plan. This Agreement, the Settlement Plan and any such orders are intended to be enforceable under federal law. This Agreement and the Settlement Plan, upon becoming effective, and the orders to be entered by the Court as contemplated hereby and under the Settlement Plan, shall be irrevocable and binding upon the Parties and their successors and assigns, notwithstanding any future decisions and orders of the Commission.
22. Enforcement. The Parties agree that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Parties for all purposes relating to enforcement of this Agreement, the Settlement Plan and the Confirmation Order.
23. Specific Performance. It is understood and agreed by each of the Parties hereto that money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for any material breach of any provision of this Agreement by any Party, and each non-breaching Party shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable relief as a remedy for any such breach, without the necessity of securing or posting a bond or other security in connection with such remedy.
24. Releases. The "Releases by Debtor" provided for in the Settlement Plan shall include PG&E Corporation, its present and former officers, directors, management (in each case, who were such on or after April 6, 2001), and professionals; the present or former members of the OCC, the present or former officers and directors and management of any present or former member of the OCC; and the Commission, its present and former commissioners and employees, as well as the advisors, consultants and professionals of or to the OCC, the members of the OCC, and the Commission, in each case in their respective capacities as such. These releases specifically do not include court claims of the People of the State of California and the City and County of San Francisco, collectively referred to as the "Business and Professions Code §17200 Law Enforcement Actions", even to the extent that there are underlying facts alleged that may be similar, coextensive, or identical to claims made by the Commission in its various actions involving PG&E and Corp.
25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
26. Captions and Paragraph Headings. Captions and paragraph headings used herein are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement and shall not be used in construing it.
27. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with the Settlement Plan and the Confirmation Order, contains the entire understanding of the Parties concerning the subject matter of this Agreement and, except as expressly provided for herein, supersedes all prior understandings and agreements, whether oral or written, among them with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof. There are no representations, warranties, agreements, arrangements or understandings, oral or written, between the Parties hereto relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and such other documents and instruments which are not fully expressed herein or therein. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by an agreement in writing signed by each of the Parties hereto which is filed with and, if necessary, approved by, the Court.
28. Time of Essence. Time is hereby expressly made of the essence with respect to each and every term and provision of this Agreement upon its effectiveness. The Parties acknowledge that each will be relying upon the timely performance by the others of their obligations hereunder as a material inducement to each Party's execution and approval of this Agreement.
29. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Except as may be specifically set forth in this Agreement or the Settlement Plan, nothing in this Agreement, whether express or implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement on any Persons other than the Parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns, nor is anything in this Agreement intended to relieve or discharge the obligation or liability of any third Persons to any Party, nor give any third Persons any right of subrogation or action against any Party.
30. Authority; Enforceability. Each Party represents and warrants to the others that this Agreement has been duly authorized by all action required of such Party to be bound thereby, and that this Agreement, when effective, constitutes valid, binding and enforceable obligations of such Party.
31. Waiver of Compliance. To the extent permitted by applicable law, any failure of any of the Parties to comply with any obligation, covenant, agreement or condition set forth herein may be waived by the Party entitled to the benefit thereof only by a written instrument signed by such Party, but any such waiver shall not operate as a waiver of, or estoppel with respect to, any prior or subsequent failure to comply therewith. The failure of a Party to this Agreement to assert any of its rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of such rights.
32. California Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof, except that this Agreement, the Settlement Plan and any orders of the Court (including the Confirmation Order) are intended to be enforceable under federal law.
33. Admissions. This Agreement is a compromise believed by the Parties to be in the best interests of all concerned parties. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed or deemed to be an admission by any of the Parties of any liability or any material fact in connection with any other litigation or proceeding.
34. Confirmation Order. The Confirmation Order shall, among other things, order the Parties to perform under and in accordance with this Agreement and the Settlement Plan. The Confirmation Order shall be in form and substance satisfactory to each of the Parties.
35. Plan Documents. This Agreement is expressly conditioned on the preparation and approval by the Court of the Settlement Plan, the disclosure statement for the Settlement Plan, and the Confirmation Order, each of which shall be in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to each of the Parties.
36. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate at the end of five (5)years from the Effective Date, provided that all rights of the Parties under this Agreement that vest on or prior to such termination, including any rights arising from any default under this Agreement, shall survive such termination for the purpose of enforcing such vested rights.
37. Conditions Precedent to Effectiveness. This Agreement shall only be binding upon the Parties and their respective successors and assigns and enforceable in accordance with its terms upon: (1) approval by the boards of directors of PG&E and PG&E Corporation, (2) approval by the Commission, and (3) execution of this Agreement by all Parties on or before December 31, 2003.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
LIST OF PROCEEDINGS
A.00-05-002, -003, -004; -005; A.01-05-003, -009, -017, -018; A.02-05-002, -003, -005, -007, Annual Earnings Assessment Proceeding (AEAP) applications.
A.01-09-003, PG&E 2001 Annual Transition Cost Proceeding, Phase 1 cost recovery issues.
A.02-06-019, PG&E's 2002 Attrition Proceeding.
A.99-03-039, Public Utilities Code Section 368(e) proceeding.
A.00-07-013, PG&E Electric Restructuring Cost Account application.
A.02-11-017 and A.02-09-005, PG&E 2003 General Rate Case applications.
OTHER PROCEEDINGS TO BE DISMISSED
Various market valuation applications under AB 1890, Public Utilities Code Section 367(b), including Docket Nos. A.99-09-053, A.00-05-034.
A.00-06-046, PG&E application to implement benefit sharing ratemaking for Diablo Canyon pursuant to CPUC Diablo Canyon restructuring decisions. (Probably superseded by D.02-04-016, URG decision.)
I.01-04-002, CPUC investigation into past holding company actions during energy crisis (but only as to past actions, not prospective matters).
(a) Applications to Transfer Regulatory Assets filed with the FERC in Docket Nos. EC02-3 1, EL02-36, ES02-17, ER02-456, and ER02-455
(b) Applications to Transfer Hydro Assets filed with FERC in Project Nos. 77-116, 96-031, 137-031, 175-018, 178-015, 233-082, 606-020, 619-095, 803-055, 1061-056, 1121-058, 1333-037, 1354-029, 1403-042, 1962-039, 1988-030, 2105-087, 2106-039, 2107-012, 2130-030, 2155-022, 2310-120, 2467-016, 2661-016, 2687-022, 2735-071, 2118-006, 2281-005, 2479-003, 2678-001, 2781-004, 2784-001, 4851-004, 5536-001, 5828-003, 7009-004, and 10821-002.
(c) Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity filed with FERC in Docket Nos. CP02-38, CP02-39, CP02-40, CP02-41, and CP02-42.
(d) License Transfer Application filed with the NRC in Docket Nos. 50-275-LT, and 50-323-LT.
(e) Filing with the SEC for Approval under the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 to create Electric Generation LLC, ETrans LLC, and GTrans LLC.APPENDIX E
LAND CONSERVATION COMMITMENT
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
PG&E shall ensure that the Watershed Lands it owns and Carizzo Plains are conserved for a broad range of beneficial public values, including the protection of the natural habitat of fish, wildlife and plants, the preservation of open space, outdoor recreation by the general public, sustainable forestry, agricultural uses, and historic values. PG&E will protect these beneficial public values associated with the Watershed Lands and Carizzo Plains from uses that would conflict with their conservation. PG&E recognizes that such lands are important to maintaining the quality of life of local communities and all the people of California in many ways, and it is PG&E's intention to protect and preserve the beneficial public values of these lands under the terms of any agreements concerning their future ownership or management.
PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation will develop a plan for protection of these lands for the benefit of the citizens of California. Protecting such lands will be accomplished through either (1) PG&E's donation of conservation easements to one or more public agencies or qualified conservation organizations consistent with these objectives, or (2) PG&E's donation of lands in fee to one or more public entities or qualified conservation organizations, whose ownership would be consistent with these conservation objectives.
1. PG&E Shall Place Permanent Conservation Easements on or Donate Watershed Lands: The Watershed Lands and Carizzo Plains shall (1) be subject to permanent conservation easements restricting development of the lands so as to protect and preserve their beneficial public values, and/or (2) be donated in fee simple to one or more public entities or qualified non-profit conservation organizations, whose ownership will ensure the protection of these beneficial public values. PG&E will not be expected to make fee simple donations of Watershed Lands that contain PG&E's or a joint licensee's hydroelectric project features. In instances where PG&E has donated land in fee, some may be sold to private entities subject to conservation easements and others, without significant public interest value, may be sold to private entities with few or no restrictions.
The conservation easements shall provide for the preservation of land areas for the protection of the natural habitat of fish, wildlife and plants, the preservation of open space, outdoor recreation by the general public, sustainable forestry, agricultural uses, and historic values and, shall prevent any other uses that will significantly impair or interfere with those values. Conservation easements on the Watershed Lands will include an express reservation of a right for continued operation and maintenance of hydroelectric facilities and associated water delivery facilities, including project replacements and improvements required to meet existing and future water delivery requirements for power generation and consumptive water use by existing users, compliance with any FERC license, FERC license renewal or other regulatory requirements. In addition, easements will honor existing agreements for economic uses, including consumptive water deliveries. The conservation easements shall be donated to and managed by one or more non-profit conservation trustees, qualified conservation organizations or public agencies with the experience and expertise to fully and strictly implement the conservation easements.
2. Process For Development of the Conservation Easements and Land Donation Plan: PG&E will work with PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation and the Commission in the development and implementation of the conservation easements and land donation plan. PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation will recommend to PG&E (1) conservation objectives for the properties, including identification of conservation values, (2) criteria for ultimate disposition of the properties, (3) conservation easements guidelines, and (4) land disposition plans.
3. Reporting Responsibilities: PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation will prepare a report to the Commission within 18 months of the Effective Date describing the status of the conservation easement and land disposition plan. PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation will make the report available to the public upon request. Every two years following the first report, PG&E Environmental Enhancement Corporation will prepare a report to the Commission on the implementation of the conservation easement and land disposition plan.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that I have by mail, and by electronic mail to the parties to which an electronic mail address has been provided, this day served a true copy of the original attached Commissioner Brown's Proposed Alternate Decision on all parties of record in this proceeding or their attorneys of record.
Dated December 4, 2003, at San Francisco, California.
/s/ Vana White
Parties should notify the Process Office, Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 2000,
San Francisco, CA 94102, of any change of address to insure that they continue to receive documents. You must indicate the proceeding number on the service list on which your name appears.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The Commission's policy is to schedule hearings (meetings, workshops, etc.) in locations that are accessible to people with disabilities. To verify that a particular location is accessible, call: Calendar Clerk (415) 703-1203.
If specialized accommodations for the disabled are needed, e.g., sign language interpreters, those making the arrangements must call the Public Advisor at (415) 703-2074,
TTY 1-866-836-7825 or (415) 703-5282 at least three working days in advance of the event.