All Documents For Proceeding A0209043 Date Filed: September 30, 2002

Number of Documents: 175 Type: REHEARING REQUEST Filing Date: July 13, 2006 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: of D06-06-025. Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION Filing Date: April 17, 2006 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: of D06-04-018. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: April 19, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to WEM's third supplemental request for compensation. Type: SUPPLEMENT Filing Date: April 1, 2005 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: Third; to Request for Compensation. Type: REPLY Filing Date: December 2, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: CORRECTED; to the response of PG&E to request for award of intervenor compensation. Type: REPLY Filing Date: December 1, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: to PG&E's opposition to request for compensation. Type: REPLY Filing Date: December 1, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: to the response of PG&E to Request for Award of Intervenor Compensation. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: November 16, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to request for an award of compensation to the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: November 16, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to WEM's request for compensation. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 10, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/THORSON/PUC Description: Grants the motions of Women's Energy Matters both filed on October 27, 2004, to the extent set forth. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: November 1, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in response to Ordering Paragraph 14 of D04-08-046. Type: SUPPLEMENT Filing Date: November 1, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: to request for award of intervenor compensation. Type: SUPPLEMENTAL Filing Date: November 1, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: information for request for compensation. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: October 29, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: Correction of request for award of comepnsation. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: October 27, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: motion for protective order regarding personal financial information. Type: SUPPLEMENTAL Filing Date: October 27, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: PUBLIC VERSION; information for request for compensation. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: October 27, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: for leave to file confidential materials under seal; confidential materials attached and filed under seal. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: October 22, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: for Compensation. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: October 22, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: for Award of Intervenor Compensation. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: October 7, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: for Award of Compensation; supporting Declaration. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 24, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: LATE FILED. On August 18, 2004, Edward W. O'Neill, outside counsel for the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens (280 Citizens), met with Darwin Farrar, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, and Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. O'Neill discussed the proposed decision (PD) of ALJ TerKeurst and alternate decision (AD) of Pres. Peevey. O'Neill summarized the remaining concerns of 280 Citizens with the 1B Hybrid Route that would be approved by both the PD and AD and urged adoption of the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification. O'Neill explained the progress 280 Citizens has made resolving issues concerning the feasibility of the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 24, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: LATE FILED. On August 17, 2004, Edward W. O'Neill, outside counsel for the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens (280 Citizens), spoke with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, by conference call. Roosevelt Grant, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, also participated in the telephone conference. O'Neill discussed the proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst and alternate decision of Pres. Peevey. O'Neill explained the progress 280 Citizens has made resolving issues concerning the feasibility of the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification to the 1B Hybrid Route that 280 Citizens has advocated. O'Neill also explained that 280 Citizens has supported solutions to the reliability needs of San Francisco and the desire of Hunter Point residents to shut down the Hunters Point Power Plant that can be implemented without adversely affecting residential neighborhoods or the environment and stated that the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise could meet all of these objectives without affecting the date for final completion of the project. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 13, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: [CORRECTED] on ALJ's ruling proposing to reopen the record regarding National Park Service mitgation proposals. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 12, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Ruling proposing to reopen the record regarding Nat'l. Park Service mitigation proposals. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 12, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: On August 12, 2004, Edward O'Neill, counsel to 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens (280 Citizens), sent a letter (copy attached to the notice) by facsimile and mail to Pres. Peevey, Cmmr. Lynch, Cmmr. Brown, Cmmr. Wood, and Cmmr. Kennedy. The letter responds to two ex parte letters dated August 5, 2004 from Richard Raushenbush, Pacific Gas and Electric Company's counsel, regarding the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification to the 1B Hybrid Route and EMF mitigation measures. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 12, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: on the submission of the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Type: PETITION Filing Date: August 11, 2004 Filed By: SAN BRUNO MOUNTAIN COALITION Description: to intervene. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 10, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On August 5, 2004, Richard Raushenbush, Attorney for Pacific Gas and Electric Company, sent, via facsimile, two letters (copies attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Peevey, Wood, Lynch, Brown, and Kennedy. The letters responded to the two July 29, 2004, letters to the Commissioners from Mark Church, President of the San Mateo Board of Supervisors. Type: RULING Filing Date: August 9, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Proposes to reopen the record re. National Park Service Mitigation Proposals. Parties may file no later than August 12, 2004, any objections to receipt into the record of the documents set forth. Parties may file, not later than August 12, 2004, any comments on the mitigation proposals. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: August 6, 2004 Filed By: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Description: to Aug 3, 2004 ALJ TerKeurst Ruling. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 5, 2004 Filed By: COUNTY OF SAN MAETO Description: LATE FILED. On July 30, 2004, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo mailed two letters (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Peevey, Lynch, Brown, Kennedy, and Wood. The letters relate to information that was submitted by parties in their comments on the proposed decision and alternate proposed decision in late June and July 2004. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 4, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF SAN BRUNO Description: On August 2, 2004, Sky Woodruff, legal counsel for the City of San Bruno, sent a letter (copy attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Peevey, Wood, Lynch, Kennedy, and Brown. The letter concerns the proposed and alternate decisions and the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens' so-called West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise. Type: RULING Filing Date: August 3, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Directs the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to report the ex parte communications; and to file a Petition to Intervene and Motion to Late File Comments on the Proposed Decision and Alternate Decision, not later than August 6, 2004. Parties may file replies no later than 5 days after such a filing is made. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 28, 2004 Filed By: SAN BRUNO MOUNTAIN WATCH Description: On July 23, 2004, Philip Batchelder, Executive Director of San Bruno Mountain Watch, met with Cmmr. Lynch in San Francisco. Also present were Darwin Farrar, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, Anita Garcia, legal intern, and Jake Sigg, Conservation Chair of the California Native Plant Societyżs Yerba Buena Chapter, Doug Allshouse, President of the Friends of San Bruno Mountain, and Francisco Da Costa, Executive Director of Environmental Justice Advocacy. Batchelder, Sigg and Allshouse discussed the San Bruno Mountain (Mountain) Conservation Plan as it relates to the `Mountain Alternative' (Alternative) of the Project. Allshouse, Sigg and Batchelder described the Alternative's likely impacts to rare species' habitat and the mitigations for the damage. Allshouse, Sigg, and Batchelder described the poor state of the PG&E transmission lines on the Mountain, including the corridor to which the new 230kV line would be collocated under the Alternative. However, Allshouse, Sigg, Batchelder, and Da Costa acknowledged the substantial public health concerns over electromagnetic fields and all agreed to the benefits of a further study of the Alterative. Da Costa asserted that such a study should include a thorough examination of the proposal's potential impacts to archeological and sacred sites. Batchelder suggested that the study would benefit from a review of PG&E past mitigation efforts for damaging projects on the Mountain. Batchelder encouraged an examination of the feasibility of routing the transmission line through a directional bore at the base of the Mountain. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 23, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: On July 21, 2004, Laura Lighthouse, representative of 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens, sent an e-mail (copy attached to the notice) to Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Manuel Ramirez, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Darwin Farrar, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, Ross LaJeunesse, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Harriett Burt, Public Advisor. In her e-mail Lighthouse explained that the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise would eliminate construction delays and improve the watershed lands east of I-280. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 16, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: On July 7, 2004, Edward W. O'Neill, outside counsel for 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens (280 Citizens), met with Ross LaJeunesse, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Written materials that are part of the record in this proceeding were used. O'Neill summarized the concerns of 280 Citizens with regard to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's proposed project, the 1B Alternative route and the 1B Hybrid route. O'Neill explained that the proposed decision (PD) and alternate decision (AD) address many of the concerned raised by 280 Citizens regarding adverse impacts on residential areas, but do not address the potentially significant impacts on residents of the Loma Vista and Skyview neighborhoods in Burlingame. O'Neill stated that the 1B Hybrid route that both the PD and AD would adopt could easily be modified to address the remaining impacts on residents by adoption of the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification to the 1B Hybrid. OżNeill noted that throughout this proceeding, 280 Citizens has sought solutions to meet the reliability needs of San Francisco and the desire of Hunters Point residents to shut down the Hunters Point Power Plant without adversely affecting residential neighborhood or the environment of the Peninsula. O'Neill explained that the Commission has ample legal authority to require the collocation and undergrounding of both the existing 60kV and new 230 kV lines in this area and urged the Commission to support the PD with the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 16, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: LATE FILED. On July 7, 2004, Edward W. O'Neill, outside counsel for 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens (280 Citizens), met with Ross LaJeunesse, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Written materials that are part of the record in this proceeding were used. O'Neill summarized the concerns of 280 Citizens with regard to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's proposed project, the 1B Alternative route and the 1B Hybrid route. O'Neill explained that the proposed decision (PD) and alternate decision (AD) address many of the concerned raised by 280 Citizens regarding adverse impacts on residential areas, but do not address the potentially significant impacts on residents of the Loma Vista and Skyview neighborhoods in Burlingame. O'Neill stated that the 1B Hybrid route that both the PD and AD would adopt could easily be modified to address the remaining impacts on residents by adoption of the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification to the 1B Hybrid. O'Neill noted that throughout this proceeding, 280 Citizens has sought solutions to meet the reliability needs of San Francisco and the desire of Hunters Point residents to shut down the Hunters Point Power Plant without adversely affecting residential neighborhood or the environment of the Peninsula. O'Neill explained that the Commission has ample legal authority to require the collocation and undergrounding of both the existing 60kV and new 230 kV lines in this area and urged the Commission to support the PD with the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification. Type: RULING Filing Date: July 8, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Makes transcript corrections. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 7, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: On July 2, 2004, Jeanne B. Armstrong of Goodin, MacBride, Squeri, Ritchie & Day, counsel to the City of Burlingame (City), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present was Larry Anderson, City Attorney for the City. Armstrong and Anderson indicated the City's support for the proposed decision (PD) of ALJ TerKeurst over the alternate decision (AD) which had been proffered by Cmmr. Peevey. Finally, Anderson stressed the City's intent to work with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) to implement all the mitigation measures which are set forth in both the PD and AD and was not attempting, as had been implied by certain PG&E's submissions, to usurp the jurisdiction of the Commission. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: July 7, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to ALJ's July 2, 2004 ruling requesting additional information. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: July 7, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens' motion to reopen the record. Type: OBJECTION Filing Date: July 7, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: to PG&E's response to ALJ's July 2, 2004 ruling requiring additional information. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 7, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: On July 2, 2004, Jeanne B. Armstrong of Goodin, MacBride, Squeri, Ritchie & Day, counsel to the City of Burlingame (City), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Roosevelt Grant, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Larry Anderson, City Attorney for the City. Armstrong and Anderson indicated the City's support for the proposed decision (PD) of ALJ TerKeurst over the alternate decision (AD) which had been proffered by Cmmr. Peevey. Finally, Anderson stressed the City's intent to work with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) to implement all the mitigation measures which are set forth in both the PD and AD and was not attempting, as had been implied by certain PG&E's submissions, to usurp the jurisdiction of the Commission. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: reply; on proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP Description: Additional Route Alternatives Analysis for PG&E Jefferson-Martin 230 KV Transmission Project [pursuant to the June 8, 2004 ruling]. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 1, 2004, John Clarke, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Wood, in San Francisco. Also present were Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, and Jennifer Dowdell, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Kevin Dasso, Director, Electric Transmission & Distribution Engineering, and Richard Raushenbush, Attorney, Latham Watkins, for PG&E. Clarke explained why PG&E supports Cmmr. Peevey's alternate proposed decision (APD), stating that it appropriately selects a northern route consistent with the record and findings in the environmental impact report, and accurately reflects the Commission's policies. Dasso explained why PG&E needs to complete construction of the Jefferson-Martin transmission line upgrade before the end of 2005. Raushebush stated that the record evidence shows that there is no specific basis to conclude that EMF exposure causes adverse human health effects. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: On July 1, 2004, Katie Carlin, representative of 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens (280 Citizens), met with Cmmr. Lynch in San Francisco. Also present were Darwin Farrar, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, and Edward W. O'Neill, outside counsel for 280 Citizens. Written materials that are part of the record were used. Carlin explained that the proposed decision (PD) and alternate decision (AD) address many of the concerns raised by 280 Citizens regarding adverse impacts on residential areas, but do not address potentially significant impacts on residents in the Loma Vista and Skyview neighborhoods in Burlingame. O'Neill stated that the 1B Hybrid route that both the PD and AD would adopt could easily be modified to address the remaining impacts on residents by adoption of the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification to the 1B Hybrid. O'Neill stated noted that throughout this proceeding, 280 Citizens has sought solutions to meet the reliability needs of San Francisco and the desire of Hunters Point residents to shut down the Hunters Point Power Plant without adversely affecting residential neighborhood or the environment of the Peninsula. Carlin also explained the basis for 280 Citizens' concerns regarding health and safety risks associated with exposure to EMFs from high voltage transmission lines. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: On July 1, 2004, Edward W. O?Neill, outside counsel for 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens (280 Citizens), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Christopher A. Hilen, outside counsel for 280 Citizens. Written materials that are part of the record were used. O'Neill and Hilen explained that the proposed decision (PD) and alternate decision (AD) address many of the concerns raised by 280 Citizens regarding adverse impacts on residential areas on the San Francisco Peninsula, but do not address potentially significant land use conflicts, construction impacts, visual impacts, or EMF concerns of residents of the Loma Vista and Skyview neighborhoods in Burlingame. O'Neill and Hilen stated that the 1B Hybrid route that both the PD and AD would adopt could easily be modified to address the remaining impacts on residents by adoption of the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification to the 1B Hybrid. O'Neill stated noted that throughout this proceeding, 280 Citizens has sought solutions to meet the reliability needs of San Francisco and the desire of Hunters Point residents to shut down the Hunters Point Power Plant without adversely affecting residential neighborhood or the environment on the Peninsula. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: On July 1, 2004, Katie Carlin, representative of 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens (280 Citizens), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Edward W. O'Neill and Christopher A. Hilen, outside counsel for 280 Citizens, and Laura Lighthouse and Tallula Lighthouse, representatives of 280 Citizens. Written materials that are part of the record were used. Carlin explained that the proposed decision (PD) and alternate decision (AD) address many of the concerns raised by 280 Citizens regarding adverse impacts on residential areas, but do not address potentially significant impacts on residents in the Loma Vista and Skyview neighborhoods in Burlingame. O'Neill stated that the 1B Hybrid route that both the PD and AD would adopt could easily be modified to address the remaining impacts on residents by adoption of the West of Skyline Boulevard Compromise modification to the 1B Hybrid. O'Neill stated noted that throughout this proceeding, 280 Citizens has sought solutions to meet the reliability needs of San Francisco and the desire of Hunters Point residents to shut down the Hunters Point Power Plant without adversely affecting residential neighborhood or the environment of the Peninsula. Carlin and Laura Lighthouse also explained the basis for 280 Citizens? concerns regarding health and safety risks associated with exposure to EMFs from high voltage transmission lines. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on the alternate of Cmmr. Peevey granting a CPCN. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: reply; on Alternate of Cmmr. Peevey. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst and the proposed alternate decision of Cmmr. Peevey. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst granting a CPCN. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst and alternate of Cmmr. Peevey granting a CPCN. Type: RULING Filing Date: July 2, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Requires additional information to be filed by July 6, 2004. Objections to the receipt into evidence of the filed information by July 7, 2004. Grants Edison's motion to intervene. Responses to July 1, 2004 motion of the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens to reopen the record are due July 6, 2004. Responses to PG&E's request to take official notice of the documents contained in its comments on alternate decision are due July 6, 2004. Type: MOTION Filing Date: July 1, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: to reopen the record for receipt of five photographs. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 30, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: of Pres. Peevey; Request to Take Official Notice of Documents in Appendix B. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 30, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: of Cmmr. Peevey. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 30, 2004 Filed By: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Description: of Cmmr. Peevey. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 30, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: [of Cmmr. Peevey.] Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 30, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: of Cmmr. Peevey. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 30, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: of Cmmr. Peevey. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 30, 2004 Filed By: TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH Description: of Cmmr. Peevey. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: on the proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst. Type: MOTION Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: to Intervene. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: [on the proposed decision of AL TerKeurst]. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: on the proposed decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH Description: to proposed decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: on the proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on the proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR Description: opening; on the ALJ's proposed decision and the alternate decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: GENENTECH, INC. Description: on ALJ's proposed decision and alternate proposed decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: opening; on the proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF DALY CITY Description: on proposed decision and proposed alternate decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONCERNED BUSINESSES EAST OF 101 Description: joint; on proposed decision of ALJ TerKeurst. Type: ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 22, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Opinion granting a CPCN. Comments are due on June 30, and reply comments - July 6, 2004. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 18, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF SAN BRUNO CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Description: on the Proposed Decision of ALJ TerKeurst. Type: PROPOSED DECISION Filing Date: June 8, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Opinion granting a CPCN. Comments are due June 28, 2004; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: RULING Filing Date: June 8, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/LYNCH/PUC Description: Orders Asopen to undertake an analysis of PG&E's Route Option 2A and the San Bruno Mountain alternatives and submit the results to the Commission by July 6, 2004. Type: RULING Filing Date: June 4, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Denies CARE's and WEM's motions to reopen the record; grants CAISO's petition for the receipt of additional evidence, as set forth; receives certain evidence; submits the record. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: May 25, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to ALJ's ruling setting aside submission and requiring additional information. Type: REPLY Filing Date: May 24, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: to Opposition to Renewed Motion to Reopen the Record. Type: RULING Filing Date: May 19, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Sets aside submission. Directs PG&E to file a document containing additional information by May 15, 2004; parties may file objections to the receipt into evidence of the filed information, by June 1, 2004 Type: RULING Filing Date: May 10, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Addresses the supplemental statement of CARE in support of its notice of intent to claim compensation. Determines that CARE is eligible to claim intervenor compensation. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: April 28, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: to renewed motion of Californians for Renewable Energy to reopen the record. Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: Renewed; to Reopen the Record. Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 16, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: to reopen the record. [Motion served on March 3, 2004] Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 12, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC. Description: to reopen the record, or in the alternative request the briefing schedule be extended ten business days. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 30, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to strike the opening and reply briefs of Women's Energy Matters. Type: STATEMENT Filing Date: March 25, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: Supplemental; in support of Notice of Intent to Claim Compensation. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 19, 2004 Filed By: GENENTECH, INC. Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 19, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 18, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 18, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: closing; post-hearing, in support of PG&E's application. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 18, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 18, 2004 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 18, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 18, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 18, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF DALY CITY Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 18, 2004 Filed By: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 17, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: reply. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: March 17, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR Description: to WEM's motion to reopen the record. Type: PETITION Filing Date: March 17, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR Description: to set aside submission and reopen the proceeding. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: March 17, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Women's Energy Matters' Motion to reopen the record. Type: RULING Filing Date: March 11, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Finds that WEM will be eligible to claim compensation, subject to conditions set forth. Directs CARE to amend its NOI to claim compensation by March 25, 2004, as set forth. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Description: closing. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: Opening Brief Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF SAN BRUNO Description: Opening Brief; on behalf of the City of San Bruno City Council and Redevelopment Agency Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: Opening Brief on the Jefferson-Martin Transmission Project Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR Description: Opening Brief Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: DALY CITY Description: Opening Brief Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: Opening Brief Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: Opening Brief regarding the construction of the Jefferson-Martin 230 kV Transmission Project Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Description: Opening Brief Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: Opening Brief Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Opening Brief regarding the Jefferson-Martin 230 kV Transmission Project Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 4, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY Description: opening, post-hearing brief in favor of PG&E's application. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: February 10, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF DALY CITY Description: Joinder in Motion for an Order to Recirculate the Final EIR of South San Francisco and Concerned Businesses East of Highway 101. Type: REPLY Filing Date: February 10, 2004 Filed By: CITY OF DALY CITY Description: to PG&E's opposition to Joinder in Motion for an Order to Recirculate the Final EIR of South San Francisco and Concerned Businesses East of Highway 101. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: February 10, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Joinder of City of Daly City in Motion for an Order to Recirculate the Final EIR of South San Francisco and Concerned Businesses East of Highway 101. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: January 28, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to the Burlingame Elementary School District's motion to intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: January 22, 2004 Filed By: BURLINGAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Description: to intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: January 8, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in Limine to Strike January 5, 2003 Statement of the County of San Mateo and to Exclude all Testimony and evidence related thereto. [includes Proposed Order and Proof of Service]. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: January 6, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to the City of South San Francisco and Concerned Businesses East of Highway 101's Motion for an Order to Recirculate the Final Environmental Impact Report. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: December 29, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to WEM's amended petition to intervene and amended motion for acceptance of late-filed notice of intent to claim compensation. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: December 17, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Motion for Leave to Submit Confidential Materials Under Seal; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Proprietary Land Cost Information and Sensitive Biology Information contained in PG&E's Direct Testimony on issues other than need consisting of (i)Unredacted Direct Testimony on Issues other than need (ii) Volume 1 of 3 (iii) Volume 2 of 3; and (iv) Volume 3 of 3. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: December 17, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: of Availability of Testimony regarding issues other than need. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 15, 2003 Filed By: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONCERNED BUSINESSES EAST OF HIGHWAY 101 Description: for an order to recirculate the final environmental impact report. Type: PETITION Filing Date: December 15, 2003 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: AMENDED Petition to intervene; comments attached. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 15, 2003 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: AMENDED Motion for acceptance of late-filed notice of intent to claim compensation. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: December 11, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to WEM's motion to intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 5, 2003 Filed By: CITY OF MILLBRAE Description: to Intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 5, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC. Description: to Intervene; ATTACHED: Notice of Intent to Claim Compensation. Type: RULING Filing Date: December 3, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Grants requests to intervene and modifies the schedule. Re-sets evidentiary hearings for January 12, 2004. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 2, 2003 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: for acceptance of late-filed notice of intent to claim compensation; notice attached. Type: PETITION Filing Date: December 2, 2003 Filed By: WOMEN'S ENERGY MATTERS Description: to intervene. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: November 19, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to motion of the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens to compel discovery from PG&E. Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: November 13, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to motion of 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens for an order shortening time to respond to motion to compel discovery responses. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: November 12, 2003 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: to compel discovery responses from PG&E. Type: PETITION Filing Date: November 12, 2003 Filed By: GOLDEN GATE PRODUCE TERMINAL, LTD. Description: to intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 12, 2003 Filed By: GENENTECH, INC. Description: to intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 12, 2003 Filed By: CONCERNED BUSINESSES EAST OF 101 HMS OYSTER POINT BLVD., LLC. Description: joint; to intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 12, 2003 Filed By: TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH Description: to Intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 12, 2003 Filed By: GATEWAY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION Description: to Intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 12, 2003 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS Description: for an order shortening time to respond to motion to compel discovery responses from PG&E. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 10, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Grants requests to intervene of the City of Burlingame filed October 22, and of the City of South San Francisco filed October 29, 2003. Suspends a schedule for submission of testimony. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: November 3, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to the City of Burlingame's motion to intervene. Type: PETITION Filing Date: October 29, 2003 Filed By: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Description: to intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: October 22, 2003 Filed By: CITY OF BURLINGAME Description: to Intervene. Type: REPLY Filing Date: June 6, 2003 Filed By: CITY OF DALY CITY Description: to Response Brief of PG&E to Daly City's Petition to Intervene; filing authorized by ALJ Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: May 27, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to City of Daly City's Petition to Intervene Type: PETITION Filing Date: May 14, 2003 Filed By: CITY OF DALY CITY Description: to intervene. Type: PETITION Filing Date: May 12, 2003 Filed By: CITY OF DALY CITY Description: to Intervene. Type: RULING Filing Date: May 6, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: Regarding Notice of Intent to Claim Compensation and Other Procedural Matters Type: PETITION Filing Date: April 15, 2003 Filed By: CITY OF SAN BRUNO Description: to intervene Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 10, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On April 7, 2003, John Clarke, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, in San Francisco. Also present were Billie Blanchard, Project Manager, Energy Division, Pamela Nataloni, Attorney, Legal Division, and David Kraska, Attorney, and Kevin Dasso, Director, Electric T&D Engineering, for PG&E. Kraska stated that several parties commenting on the scope of the Commission's Environmental Impact Report for the Jefferson-Martin 230 kV Transmission Project (Project) had requested the inclusion of separate projects to relocate existing 60 kV lines in the Project area, but have not established the necessary legal 'nexus' between any impacts caused by the Project and the requested relocation of existing facilities. Kraska and Clarke explained that any decision to condition approval of the Project on PG&E's agreement to implement these relocation projects would, in addition to violating applicable standards under the California Environmental Quality Act, create a significant and unnecessary ratepayer cost burden. Dasso expressed the necessity of meeting the California Independent System Operator's deadline for completing the Project. Type: SUPPLEMENT Filing Date: March 27, 2003 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS GROUP Description: To Notice Of Intent To Claim Compensation Type: SCOPING RULING Filing Date: March 19, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC CMMR/LYNCH/PUC Description: Affirms the preliminary categorization of ratesetting. Sets the following schedule: draft EIR - July 2003; final EIR - October 2003; hrgs: 12/4-10; concurrent opening briefs - 1/9/2004; reply briefs and submission - 1/23; PD - 4/4; final decision - 5/4. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: February 7, 2003 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS GROUP Description: of intent to claim compensation Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 7, 2003 Filed By: TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH Description: Prehearing Conference Statement. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 7, 2003 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: pursuant to ALJ Terkeurst's Ruling of 12/13/02 Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 7, 2003 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS GROUP Description: pursuant to ALJ Terkeurst's Ruling of 12/13/02. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 7, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: pursuant to ALJ Terkeurst's Ruling of 12/13/02 Type: RULING Filing Date: December 13, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/TERKEURST/PUC Description: sets a prehearing conference for January 10, 2003; PHC statements are due by January 7, 2003. Type: REPLY Filing Date: November 21, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Consolidated Reply to Protests, Request for Hearings, and Comments filed by interested parties Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 13, 2002 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS GROUP Description: for leave to file late file protest; protest attached Type: PROTEST Filing Date: November 12, 2002 Filed By: TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH Description: and request for hearing. Type: PROTEST Filing Date: November 12, 2002 Filed By: 280 CORRIDOR CONCERNED CITIZENS GROUP Description: to the application Type: PROTEST Filing Date: November 12, 2002 Filed By: ORA/SCARFF/PUC Description: to application Type: PROTEST Filing Date: November 6, 2002 Filed By: DR. MARIO RABINOWITZ LAVERNE RABINOWITZ Description: to the application Type: PROTEST Filing Date: October 30, 2002 Filed By: DR. CHEOL HOON LEE Description: and Request for Hearing. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 15, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Declarations of mailing and posting of notice of an application for CPCN Type: RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION Filing Date: October 3, 2002 Filed By: COMR/PUC Description: Resolution ALJ 176-3096; Ratification of preliminary determination of category adopted. Type: APPLICATION Filing Date: September 30, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (U 39-M) Description: for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Authorizing the Construction of the Jefferson-Martin 230 kV Transmission Project. Type: FEES Filing Date: September 30, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: One-Third Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Fee Deposit per Rule 17.1(j).

Top of Page      Back to Top of Page
2000 State of California. Gray Davis, Governor. Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy | E-mail Webmaster