All Documents For Proceeding A0211017 Date Filed: November 8, 2002

Number of Documents: 299 Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 1, 2009 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Mapping Improvement Project Phase 2 (MIP2) Sixth Annual Report in compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 1, 2009 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Website Improvement Report in compliance with Decision 04-05-055 Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 1, 2009 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Line extension data collection filing in compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 1, 2008 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Line extension data collection filing in compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 1, 2008 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Mapping Improvement Project Phase 2 (MIP2) Fifth Annual Report in Compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 1, 2008 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Website Improvement Report in Compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: December 5, 2007 Filed By: The Utility Reform Network Description: Amendment to Request for an Award of Compensation for Substantial Contribution to Decision 07-09-041 and Resolution G-3372 (PG&E Billing and Collection Practices). Type: REQUEST Filing Date: November 21, 2007 Filed By: The Utility Reform Network Description: For An Award of Compensation for Substantial Contribution to Decision 07-09-041 and Resolution G-3372. Type: REPORT Filing Date: May 4, 2007 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Supplemental Line Extension Data Collection Filing in compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: RULING Filing Date: April 26, 2007 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/CPUC Description: modifying schedule of oral argument. Type: RULING Filing Date: April 12, 2007 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/CPUC Description: Setting Oral Argument. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: April 6, 2007 Filed By: CPSD/FOSS/CPUC Description: to PG&E's Appeal of the Presiding Officer's Decision. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: April 6, 2007 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: to Appeals of CPSD and the South San Joaquin Irrigation District. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: April 6, 2007 Filed By: The Utility Reform Network Description: to the Appeal of PG&E of the Presiding Officer's Decision. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: April 6, 2007 Filed By: The Utility Reform Network Description: to Motions of CPSD and PG&E for Oral Argument. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: April 5, 2007 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: in opposition to the motion of the South San Joaquin Irrigation District to reopen record. Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 2, 2007 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Mapping Improvement Project Phase 2 (MIP2) Fourth Annual Report in Compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 2, 2007 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Line Extension Data Collection Filing in compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: REPORT Filing Date: March 28, 2007 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: Website Improvement; in compliance with Decision 04-05-055. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 26, 2007 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: in the Billing and Collection Investigation Requesting Oral Argument. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 23, 2007 Filed By: CPSD/FOSS/CPUC Description: for Oral Argument with Points and Authorities. Type: APPEAL Filing Date: March 22, 2007 Filed By: CONSUMER PROTECTION AND SAFETY DIVISION - FOSS Description: of the Decision of the Presiding Officer. Type: APPEAL Filing Date: March 22, 2007 Filed By: South San Joaquin Irrigation District Description: of the Presiding Officer's Decision. Type: APPEAL Filing Date: March 22, 2007 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: of the Decision of the Presiding Officer in the Billing and Collection Investigation. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 21, 2007 Filed By: South San Joaquin Irrigation District Description: to Set Aside Submission and Reopen the Record for the Taking of Additional Evidence. Type: PROPOSED DECISION Filing Date: February 20, 2007 Filed By: ALJ/YACKNIN/CPUC Description: Presiding Officer's Decision. Any party may file an Appeal within 30 days of the date of issuance of this decision. Any Commissioner may file a Request for Review within 30 days of the date of issuance. Any party may file a Response to an Appeal or Request for Review no later than 15 days after the date the Appeal or Request for Review was filed. Type: AMENDMENT Filing Date: January 10, 2007 Filed By: The Utility Reform Network Description: to Opening Brief in the Billing and Collections Phase of I.03-01-012. (Table of Authorities added as Attachment A). Type: AMENDMENT Filing Date: January 10, 2007 Filed By: The Utility Reform Network Description: to Reply Brief in the Billing and Collections Phase of I.03-01-012. (Table of Authorities added as Attachment A). Type: TRANSCRIPT Filing Date: December 26, 2006 Filed By: REPORTING DIVISION Description: Submitted; Volume 48. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 20, 2006 Filed By: ALJ/Yacknin/CPUC Description: SETTING ASIDE SUBMISSION TO TAKE ORAL ARGUMENT. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: October 31, 2006 Filed By: ALJ/MINKIN/CPUC Description: O F R E A S S I G N M E N T. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: August 25, 2006 Filed By: CPSD/FOSS/CPUC Description: Reply to PG&E's August 15, 2006, Motion to Strike. Type: MOTION Filing Date: August 15, 2006 Filed By: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Description: to Strike Portions of the Reply Brief of CPSD. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 28, 2006 Filed By: CPSD/FOSS/CPUC Description: Reply; to the Opening Brief of PG&E in the Billing and Collection Investigation. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 28, 2006 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: Reply; in the billing and collections phase of I 03-01-012; pursuant to schedule established by ALJ Halligan. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 28, 2006 Filed By: SO. SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT Description: Reply; pursuant to the revised procedural schedule adopted by ALJ Halligan. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 28, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Reply; in the billing and collection investigation Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 7, 2006 Filed By: CPUC/CPSD/FOSS Description: Opening; regarding PG&E Billing and Collection Practices. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 7, 2006 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: opening; in the billing & collections phase of I03-01-012. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 7, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: opening; in the billing and collection investigation. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 7, 2006 Filed By: SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT Description: opening. Type: RULING Filing Date: July 3, 2006 Filed By: ALJ/Halligan/CPUC Description: ENTERING EXHIBITS INTO THE EVIDENTIARY RECORD. Type: TRANSCRIPT Filing Date: June 5, 2006 Filed By: REPORTING DIVISION Description: Submitted; Volume 47. Type: RULING Filing Date: May 16, 2006 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: on Request to Submit Surrebutal Testimony. Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 10, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to strike portions of the rebuttal testimony of the CPSD. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: April 25, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Motion to Strike Portions of Testimony. Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 10, 2006 Filed By: CPSD/FOSS/PUC Description: to strike portions of PG&E's testimony relating to Southern California Edison. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 3, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with D04-05-055: Mapping Improvement Project Phase 2 Third Annual Report. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 3, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with D04-05-055: Line Extension Data Collection Filing. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 3, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with D04-05-055: Website improvement report. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: March 6, 2006 Filed By: CPSD/FOSS/PUC Description: to PG&E's motion to strike. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: March 6, 2006 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: to the motion of PG&E to strike portions of the prepared testimony of the CPSD and TURN. Type: MOTION Filing Date: February 17, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. Description: To Strike Portions of the Prepared Testimony of CPSD and TURN Type: RULING Filing Date: February 16, 2006 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Revises a schedule for the proceeding, as follows: May 15, 2006 - prehearing conference; May 24th - evidentiary hearings, 7/7/6 - concurrent opening briefs filed, 7/28 - concurrent reply briefs filed; 9/26/6 - presiding officer's decision. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 19, 2005 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: On December 14, 2005, Dana Appling, Director of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Marc Pocta, Program Manager, and Harvey Morris, Assistant General Counsel, for the ORA. Morris stated that ORA is requesting the Commission adopt the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan. Morris explained that the alternate decision which grants PG&E a rate increase for pension contributions effective January 2006 is inconsistent with the terms of the last general rate case (GRC) settlement and four-year GRC cycle. Pocta expressed the concerns that the alternate adopts PG&E's opinion as the funding status of PG&E's pension trust without allowing other parties to express their views. Pocta noted that the appropriate level of funding is a complex policy matter that should be considered in the GRC. Pocta noted that PG&E has addressed pension funding for 2007-2009 in its current GRC. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 15, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On December 12, 2005, Jennifer Dowdell, Chief, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, had a telephone conversation with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Dowdell clarified that funding a 2006 pension contribution in 2006 rates subject to refund would result in lower costs to customers than if the Commission approved contributions for all years as part of the 2007 general rate case. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 14, 2005 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: On December 12, 2005, Marc Pocta, Program Manager of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, in San Francisco. Also present was Laura Tudisco, Staff Counsel, for the ORA. Tudisco stated that ORA is urging the Commission to adopt the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan and not to adopt the alternate decision which grants Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) rate increase for pension contributions in violation of basic due process protections. Pocta expressed his concerns that the alternate adopts PG&E's opinions as to the funding status of PG&E's pension trust without allowing other parties to express their views. Pocta and Appling noted that the appropriate level of funding is a complex policy matter that should be considered in the general rate case. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 13, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On December 9, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), sent by e-mail a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Peevey, Brown, Grueneich, Kennedy and Bohn. Copy of the letter was also e-mailed to Nilgun Atamturk and Aaron Johnson, advisors to Cmmr. Grueneich, Karl Bemesderfer and Brian Prusnek, advisors to Cmmr. Kennedy, David Gamson, Advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Rami Kahlon, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn. The letter concerned PG&E's petition to modify D04-05-055 on pension contributions. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 12, 2005 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: On December 9, 2005, Dana Appling, Director of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, in San Francisco. Also present were David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Mark Pocta, Program Manager, and Laura Tudisco, Staff Counsel, for the ORA. Tudisco stated that ORA is urging the Commission to adopt the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan and not to adopt the alternate decision which grants Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) rate increase for pension contributions in violation of basic due process protections. Pocta and Appling expressed their concerns that the alternate adopts PG&E's opinions as to the funding status of PG&E's pension trust without allowing other parties to express their views. Pocta and Appling noted that the appropriate level of funding is a complex policy matter that should be considered in the general rate case. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 12, 2005 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: On December 7, 2005, Dana Appling, Director of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, wrote a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Peevey, Kennedy, Brown, Grueneich, and Bohn. The letter asks the Commission to adopt the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan that denies the petition for modification of Pacific Gas and Electric Company relating to pension contributions. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 12, 2005 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan and the proposed alternate of Cmmr. Peevey on the petition to modify D04-05-055 regarding pension contributions. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 12, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on Draft Decision regarding pension contributions. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 5, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Draft Decision regarding pension contributions. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 5, 2005 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: on the Proposed Decision of ALJ Halligan and the Proposed Alternate of Cmmr. Peevey on the petition to modify D04-05-055 re pension contributions. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 17, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Grants the November 7, 2005 Motion of TURN for approval of a nondisclosure and protective agreement. Type: DRAFT DECISION Filing Date: November 15, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Comments are due December 4, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: ALTERNATE Filing Date: November 15, 2005 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Comments are due December 4, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: November 7, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: for approval of a nondisclosure and protective agreement. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 18, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On October 13, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and Dan Richard, Senior Vice President, Governmental and Regulatory Relations, PG&E, and Peter Corippo, Director, Investments and Benefit Finance, PG&E Corporation. Cherry discussed PG&E's petition for modification of the 2003 General Rate Case and explained that PG&E was seeking to modify the 2003 GRC to allow PG&E to file an application for a pension showing in 2006. Richard stated that the Commission specifically allowed PG&E to seek this authority in the last GRC due to changed circumstances and that the pension plan would continue to remain below funding levels over the next five years without a contribution. Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION Filing Date: October 14, 2005 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: of D05-08-028. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 6, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On October 3, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Robert Lane, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, and Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. At the meeting with Robert Lane also present was Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn. Jennifer Dowdell, Manager, Regulatory Relations, PG&E, also attended the meetings. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Cherry indicated that unlike its status at the time of the 2003 General Rate Case (GRC) decision, PG&E's pension was currently underfunded and that all PG&E was requesting in its Petition for Modification was an opportunity to make a showing in support of a 2006 pension contribution. Dowdell clarified that to begin pension contributions in 2006 would result in lower costs to customers than if the Commission waited to approve contributions in the 2007 GRC. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: September 30, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On September 27, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Karl Bemesderfer, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Also present was Jennifer Dowdell, Manager, Regulatory Relations, PG&E. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Cherry indicated that unlike its status at the time of the 2003 General Rate Case (GRC) decision, PG&E's pension was currently underfunded and that all PG&E was requesting in its Petition for Modification was an opportunity to make a showing in support of a 2006 pension contribution. Dowdell clarified that to begin pension contributions in 2006 would result in lower costs to customers than if the Commission waited to approve contributions in the 2007 GRC. Type: RULING Filing Date: August 26, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: on Notices of Intent to Claim Intervenor Compensation. Finds that the Greenlining Institute and TURN are eligible for an award of intervenor compensation. Type: REPLY Filing Date: August 22, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Responses to Petition to Modify D04-05-055 Regarding Pension Contributions. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: August 12, 2005 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: to the petition to modify D04-05-055 regarding pension contributions. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: August 12, 2005 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: to Petition of PG&E to Modify D04-05-005 Regarding Pension. Type: RULING Filing Date: August 11, 2005 Filed By: ALJ HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Joint Motion of PG&E and CPSD for an Extension of Time is granted. Evidentiary hearings will begin on 04/24/06 instead of 04/17/06. (The new schedule is set forth in the Ruling) Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: July 27, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: in support of the joint motion of PG&E and CPSD for an extension of the existing schedule in the Commission's billing investigation. Type: MOTION Filing Date: July 15, 2005 Filed By: CPSD/REIGER/PUC PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: joint; for an extension of the existing schedule in the Commission's Billing Investigation. Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION Filing Date: July 13, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: of D04-05-055 regarding penison contributions. Type: REPORT Filing Date: July 1, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Pursuant to D04-05-055. Type: MOTION Filing Date: June 16, 2005 Filed By: CPSD/REIGER/PUC Description: to withdraw a motion for an order compelling responses to data requests. Type: SCOPING RULING Filing Date: May 26, 2005 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Concerns Phase II of I03-01-012. Determines that the appropriate category for this proceeding is adjudicatory. Sets prehearing conference for January 5, 2006, and evidentiary hearings - for January 9, 2006. Final decision should issue approximately on June 1, 2006. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: May 20, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to CPSD's motion for an order compelling responses to data requests. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: May 13, 2005 Filed By: CPSD/REIGER/PUC Description: motion for an order compelling responses to data requests. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: April 20, 2005 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: of intent to seek compensation [in the billing and collection phase of the proceeding]. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: April 15, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: of intent to claim compensation [in the billing and collections phase]. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 1, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with D04-05-055: Mapping Improvement Project Phase 2 (MIP2) Second Annual Report. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: March 24, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with D04-05-055: Website Improvement Report. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: [in accordance with the Feb. 25, 2005 ruling]. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT Description: [in accordance with the Feb. 25, 2005 ruling]. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: [in accordance with the Feb. 25, 2005 ruling]. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: CPSD/REIGER/PUC Description: [in accordance with the Feb. 25, 2005 ruling]. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: for the March 22, 2005 prehearing conference. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: [pusuant to the February 25, 2005 ruling]. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: [in accordance with the Feb. 25, 2005 ruling]. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: [in accordance with the Feb. 25, 2005 ruling]. Type: RULING Filing Date: March 14, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/TRP/PUC Description: directing the Docket Office to retitle PG&E's submitted document. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 7, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for Clarification of Assigned Commissioner's Ruling. Type: RULING Filing Date: February 25, 2005 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Grants the November 9, 2004 motion of TURN for an investigation into PG&E's billing and collection practices. The investigation will be conducted in I03-01-012. Sets a prehearing conference for March 22, 2005. Prehearing conference statements should be filed by March 15, 2005. Type: REPORT Filing Date: February 4, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Delayed and Estimated Bills From 2000 through 2004. Type: REPORT Filing Date: January 28, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Line Extension Data Collection Report. Type: REPLY Filing Date: January 20, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: to PG&E's response to the motion for an investigation. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to San Francisco's Motion Regarding December 20, 2003 Electric Outage. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: January 6, 2005 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: for Award of Compensation. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: January 3, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: for compensation for substantial contributions to D04-05-055 and D04-10-034. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: December 30, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to motion of TURN for an investigation into billing and collection practices. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 20, 2004 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: requesting procedures to ensure implementation of CPSD recommendations and to determine appropriate fines and penalties. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 13, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On December 8, 2004, Gordon Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer, PG&E Utility (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch and Rami Kahlon, advisors to Pres. Peevey, and Tom Bottorff, Senior Vice-President, Customer Service and Revenue, and Karen Tomcala, Vice-President, Regulatory Relations, for PG&E. Smith emphasized that PG&E consistently operates within the CPUC's established billing policies. Bottorff discussed PG&E's transition to a new billing system resulted in higher than normal incidence of delayed bills. Bottorff noted that the number of delayed bills were now at historic lows. Tomcala stated that the proposed resolution approved PG&E's request to change its tariff prospectively, but erroneously sought to mandate additional changes retrospectively. Tomcala explained that retrospective treatment of these matters was unlawful. Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION Filing Date: December 10, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: of Decision 04-05-055 to extend due date for submission of Audited Data concerning Executive Compensation. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 3, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On November 30, 2004, Gordon Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer, PG&E Utility (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Kennedy in San Francisco. Also present were Brian Prusnek and Ross LaJeunesse, advisors to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Tom Bottorff, Senior Vice-President, Customer Service and Revenue, and Karen Tomcala, Vice-President, Regulatory Relations, for PG&E. Smith emphasized that PG&E consistently operates within the CPUC's established billing policies. Bottorff discussed PG&E's transition to a new billing system resulted in higher than normal incidence of delayed bills. Bottorff noted that the number of delayed bills were now at historic lows. Tomcala stated that the proposed resolution approved PG&E's request to change its tariff prospectively, but erroneously sought to mandate additional changes retrospectively. Tomcala explained that retrospective treatment of these matters was unlawful. Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 9, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: for an investigation into PG&E's billing and collection practices. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 28, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: On October 26, 2004, Mark Pocta, Program Manager with the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Pocta stated that ORA was concerned with the magnitude of the potential penalties and rewards of $41.6 million as set forth in the alternate proposed decisions of both Cmmr. Wood and Cmmr. Kennedy. Pocta stated that if the Commission intent is on adopting an incentive mechanism, he recommended that the mechanism be modified to incorporate more modest System Average Interruption Duration Index and System Average Interruption Frequency Index rewards and penalties totaling $24 million, as originally proposed by PG&E. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: October 26, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on alternate of Cmmr. Kennedy in the storm/reliability phase of the 2003 GRC. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: October 26, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: reply; on the alternate of Cmmr. Kennedy. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 26, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: On October 25, 2004, Mark Pocta, Program Manager of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Raminder Kahlon, advisor to Pres. Peevey. Pocta urged the adoption of the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan. Pocta explained that ORA was especially concerned with the magnitude of the potential penalties and rewards of $41.6 million in the alternate proposed decisions (APDs) of both Cmmr. Wood and Cmmr. Kennedy. Pocta stated that if the Commission intends to adopt an incentive mechanism, ORA recommends that the mechanism be modified to incorporate more modest System Average Interruption Duration Index and System Average Interruption Frequency Index rewards and penalties totaling $24 million, as originally proposed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company, rather than $41.6 million the APDs would adopt. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: October 21, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EIMPLOYEES Description: of Cmmr. Kennedy. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: October 21, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: of Cmmr. Kennedy. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: October 21, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: opening; on alternate of Cmmr. Kennedy on storm/reliability phase of the 2003 GRC. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: October 21, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: of Cmmr. Kennedy on storm and reliability issues. Type: ALTERNATE Filing Date: October 14, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/KENNEDY/PUC Description: Interim Opinion on Storm and Reliability Issues. Comments are due October 21, 2004; reply comments - October 26, 2004. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 6, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On October 1, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief of Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. Also present were Jeff Butler, Senior Vice President, Transmission and Distribution, Bill Blastic, Director, Electric Control Center Operations, and Jennifer Dowdell, Manager, Regulatory Relations, for PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Butler, Blastic and Jacobson emphasized the importance of adopting reasonable benchmarks for any reliability incentive mechanism. Butler described the impact of weather on PG&E's historical SAIDI performance and stated that PG&E was committed to improve its reliability. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 27, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On August 24, 2004, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Also present were Bill Blastic, Director, Electric Control Center Operations, and Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations, for PG&E. Cherry emphasized the importance of adopting the terms of the PG&E/CUE agreement to the greatest extent possible. Blastic described the parameters of an incentive mechanism for PG&E based on the mechanism adopted by the Commission for Southern California Edison in its general rate case. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: August 25, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to requests of the NRDC, Aglet and the Greenlining Institute for intervenor compensation. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 9, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On August 4, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were David Gamson and Peter Hanson, advisors to Cmmr. Brown, and Bill Blastic, Director, Electric Control Center, PG&E. Written material (copy attached to the notice) was used. Jacobson stated that PG&E recommends that the Commission adopt the reliability incentive mechanism agreed to by PG&E and CUE. Jacobson indicated that in the event that the Commission does not provide PG&E with the incremental revenues necessary to achieve the reliability benchmarks in the PG&E/CUE joint agreement, the benchmarks should be revised. Jacobson explained the importance of having a deadband large enough to account for performance variations due to weather. Blastic stated that reliability performance statistics are not comparable across utilities. Blastic compared and contrasted alternative incentive mechanisms. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: August 2, 2004 Filed By: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Description: for award of intervenor compensation. Type: SUPPLEMENT Filing Date: July 28, 2004 Filed By: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: to Request for Intervenor Compensation for substantial contribution to D04-05-055 and request for ruling. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: July 27, 2004 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: for Award of Compensation. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: July 26, 2004 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: for intervenor compensation for substantial contribution to D04-05-055. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 26, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 21, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Also present was Bill Blastic, Director, Electric Control Center Operations, PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Jacobson stated that PG&E recommends that the Commission adopt the reliability incentive mechanism agreed to by PG&E and CUE. Jacobson explained that in the event that the Commission does not provide PG&E with the incremental revenues necessary to achieve the reliability targets in PG&E/CUE joint agreement, PG&E recommends that the benchmarks be based on PG&E's average historical performance and that the deadband be large enough to account for performance variations. Blastic explained that reliability performance statistics are not comparable across utilities. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 20, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 20, 2004, Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cherry stated that PG&E was committed to improving its SAIDI and SAIFI response times, but that the revised Halligan decision and the alternate decision of Cmmr. Wood were unbalanced. Cherry stated that the Commission's recent approval of the CUE/Edison agreement should serve as a guide with regards to both SAIDI and SAIFI percentage targets and size of the dead band. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: July 19, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Mothers for Peace request for award of compensation for substantial contribution to D04-05-055. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 14, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 9, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief of Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Written materials (copies attached to the notice) were used. Jacobson explained that PG&E is opposed to the alternate proposed decision of Cmmr. Wood because it is unbalanced. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 14, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 9, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief of Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Jacobson explained that PG&E is opposed to the alternate proposed decision of Cmmr. Wood because it is unbalanced. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 9, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 6, 2004, Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and Jeff Butler, Senior Vice President, Transmission and Distribution, Lise Jordan, Attorney, and Eric Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations, for PG&E. Cherry stated that PG&E is opposed to the alternate proposed decision of Cmmr. Wood because it is unbalanced and punitive. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 7, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 1, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Jacobson explained that PG&E is opposed to the alternate proposed decision of Cmmr. Wood because it is unbalanced and punitive. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 7, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: On July 1, 2003, Marc Joseph, attorney for the Coalition of California Utility Employees (CUE), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present was Art Carter, representing CUE. Joseph stated that while CUE preferred the original agreement between CUE and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), if the Commission was not interested in providing additional revenue to PG&E even for reliability improvements, the Commission should adopt the Cmmr. Wood's alternate decision. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: reply; on the alternate of Cmmr. Wood on storm and reliability issues. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: reply; on the alternate of Cmmr. Wood. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: reply; [on alternate of Cmmr. Wood]. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 6, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on alternate of Cmmr. Wood in the storm/reliability peformance phase. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: July 2, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with D04-05-055: [Annual] Website Improvement Report. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: July 2, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with D04-05-055: [Annual] Mapping Improvement Project Phase 2 Report. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 1, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: of Cmmr. Wood. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 1, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: [of Cmmr. Wood]. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: July 1, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: of Cmmr. Wood in the storm/reliability performance Phase of the 2003 GRC. Type: ALTERNATE Filing Date: June 24, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/WOOD/PUC Description: Interim opinion on storm and reliability issues. Comments are due July 1, 2004; reply comments - July 6, 2004. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: June 17, 2004 Filed By: SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE Description: for award of compensation for substantial contribuion to D04-05-055. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 25, 2004 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: reply; on the alternate of Cmmr. Brown. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 25, 2004 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: reply; on alternate of Cmmr. Brown. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 25, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on Phase 1 issues [on the alternate of Cmmr. Brown]. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 20, 2004 Filed By: ORA/GILEAU/PUC Description: of Cmmr. Brown. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 20, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Phase I issues. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 20, 2004 Filed By: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: of Cmmr. Brown. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 20, 2004 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: On May 19, 2004, James Weil, Director of Aglet Consumer Alliance (Aglet), participated in a meeting with Cmmr. Lynch in San Francisco. Also present were Mike Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, Mark Pocta of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Eric Jacobson, Karen Tomcala, Patrick Golden, and Bruce Smith for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and Robert Finkelstein for The Utility Reform Network. Weil stated that Aglet supports the distribution and generation settlements that are the subject of the alternate proposed decision of Cmmr. Brown. Weil indicated that Aglet took a lead role in litigation of attrition issues. Weil noted that Aglet estimates that the two settlements will save ratepayers approximately $213 million during the years 2004, 2005 and 2006. Weil stated that the settlements are compromises of strongly held views. Weil explained that reliance on the Consumer Price Index rather than utility-specific escalation rates to calculate attrition allowances will benefit ratepayers. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 19, 2004 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: of Cmmr. Brown, on Phase I issues. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 19, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On May 19, 2004, Karen Tomcala, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Lynch in San Francisco. Also present were Michael Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, Mark Pocta, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), Patrick Golden, Attorney, Bruce Smith, Manager, Revenue Requirements, and Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations, for PG&E, Bob Finkelstein, The Utility Reform Network (TURN), and James Weil, Aglet Consumer Alliance (Aglet). Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Tomcala discussed the proposed decision in PG&E's general rate case. Tomcala and Golden stated that the Distribution and Generation settlements, including the attrition floors, represent a reasonable compromise of PG&E's, TURN's, ORA's, and Aglet's litigation positions and should be approved without modification. Golden stated that the settlement was negotiated after development of a full evidentiary record and that the settlement was reasonable based on this record. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 17, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On May 12, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Manuel Ramirez, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, in San Francisco. Also present was Lise Jordan, Attorney for PG&E. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Jordan stated that PG&E supports the California Coalition of Utility Employees/PG&E agreement (Agreement) that is based on a careful balancing of the reliability targets, dead bands, live bands, reward/penalty limits and the incremental revenue requirement. Jordan explained the difference between the 'adequate service' standard and the more stringent reliability targets in the Agreement. Jacobson stated that anticipated reliability improvements would be small compared to the annual fluctuations in SAIDI and SAIFI indices. Jacobson urged the Commission to adopt the Agreement as a whole. Type: ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 13, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/BROWN/PUC Description: Opinion: Phase 1 Issues. Comments are due May 20th; reply comments - May 25, 2004. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 10, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On May 5, 2004, Patrick Golden, Attorney, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), sent an email (attached to the notice) to ALJ Halligan. In the email, Golden stated that during the May 4, 2004 oral argument, he noted that PG&E now reports compliance with General Order 156 goals both with and without regard to so-called 'excludable' categories. The email clarified that the Commission had not directed PG&E to report achievements both ways. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 7, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON MAY 3, 2004, AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF MAY 10, 2004. On April 29, 2003, Marc Joseph, attorney for the Coalition of California Utility Employees (CUE), participated in an all-party meeting with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were Manuel Ramirez and Steven Weissman, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, Mark Pocta for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Karen Tomcala, Patrick Golden and Lise Jordan for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Bob Gnaizda for the Greenlining Institute, James Weil for Aglet Consumer Alliance, Matt Freedman for The Utility Reform Network, and Diane Fellman for the Diablo Canyon Independent Safety Committee. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Joseph stated that the proposed decision (PD) on storm and reliability issues should be modified to establish the standard of reasonable performance at the levels that the PD calculated based on the reliability improvements being funded in the general rate case, rather than at historic performance levels. Joseph also stated that PG&E should be given performance incentives analogous to those for Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, but that according to the PD, no additional revenue was required for PG&E to be able to improve its performance. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 5, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: LATE FILED. On April 29, 2004, Karen Tomcala, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), participated in an all-party meeting with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were Manuel Ramirez, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, Patrick Golden and Lise Jordan, Attorneys, for PG&E, and other participants. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Tomcala stated that the Distribution and Generation settlements in PG&E's general rate case, including the attrition floors, should be approved without modification to preserve the balance of settlement parties' interests. Jordan explained PG&E's opposition to the penalty only reliability benchmarks proposed by the Coalition of California Utility Employees and The Utility Reform Network. Type: REPLY Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: to Comments on Proposed Decision of ALJ Halligan on Phase 1 issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SAFETY COMMITTEE Description: reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on the proposed decision on Phase 1 issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on the storm/reliability performance phase. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: ORA/GILEAU/PUC Description: On April 29, 2004, Mark Pocta, Program Manager, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Wood in an all-party meeting in San Francisco. Also present were Manuel Ramirez and Steven Weissman, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, Laura Tudisco, Staff Counsel for ORA, Karen Tomcala, Vice President Regulatory Relations, and Patrick Golden and Lise Jordan, Attorneys, for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), James Weil of Aglet Consumer Alliance, Matthew Freedman of The Utility Reform Network, and Marc Joseph of the Coalition of California Utility Employees. Pocta stated that ORA supported the proposed decision (PD) of ALJ in PG&E 2003 General Rate Case except with respect to the elimination of the floors for attrition. Pocta indicated that ORA supported the PD's treatment of the pension contribution issue. ORA recommended that the PD be revised to adopt the attrition mechanism floors as set forth in the settlement. Pocta explained that the PD's elimination of the attrition floors disregards the fact that the CPI-based mechanism negotiated by the parties results in attrition increases substantially less than compared to the traditional methodology proposed by PG&E, and supported by ORA. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On April 29, 2003, Marc Joseph, attorney for the Coalition of California Utility Employees (CUE), participated in an all-party meeting with Cmmr. Wood. Also present were Manuel Ramirez and Steven Weissman, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, Mark Pocta for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Karen Tomcala, Patrick Golden and Lise Jordan for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Bob Gnaizda for the Greenlining Institute, James Weil for Aglet Consumer Alliance, Matt Freedman for The Utility Reform Network, and Diane Fellman for the Diablo Canyon Independent Safety Committee. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Joseph stated that the proposed decision (PD) on storm and reliability issues should be modified to establish the standard of reasonable performance at the levels that the PD calculated based on the reliability improvements being funded in the general rate case, rather than at historic performance levels. Joseph also stated that PG&E should be given performance incentives analogous to those for Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, but that according to the PD, no additional revenue was required for PG&E to be able to improve its performance. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On April 28, 2004, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Cherry discussed the proposed decision (PD) of ALJ Halligan. Cherry stated that the PD failed to include a reasonable pension contribution for PG&E's CPUC authorized rate case. Cherry stated that PG&E ratepayers would not be at risk of paying for a funded status of more than 100% and that any excess above 100% would be returned to ratepayers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: reply; to comments on ALJ Halligan's proposed decision on Phase I issues. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 30, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On April 26, 2004, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Brown in San Francisco. Also present were David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Mark Pocta for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), Karen Tomcala, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, Patrick Golden, Attorney, Bruce Smith, Manager, Revenue Requirements, and Janice Berman, Director, Rates & Tariffs, for PG&E, James Weil for Aglet Consumer Alliance (Aglet), and Robert Finkelstein for The Utility Reform Network (TURN). Written material (attached to the notice) was used. PG&E discussed the proposed decision. Tomcala stated that the distribution and generation settlements, including the attrition floors, represent a reasonable compromise of PG&E's, TURN's, ORA's, and Aglet's litigation positions and should be approved without modification, to preserve the balance of settlement parties' interests. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 29, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: On April 26, 2003, Marc Joseph, attorney for the Coalition of California Utility Employees (CUE), had two separate telephone conversations: with Bill Julian, advisor to Cmmr. Wood; and with Cmmr. Peevey. Art Carter, representing CUE, was participating in the communication with Cmmr. Peevey. Joseph stated that the proposed decision (PD) on storm and reliability issues should be modified to establish the standard of reasonable performance at the levels that the PD calculated based on the reliability improvements being funded in the general rate case, rather than at historic performance levels. Joseph also stated that Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) should be given performance incentives analogous to those for Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, but that according to the PD, no additional revenue was required for PG&E to be able to improve its performance. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 28, 2004 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: On April 26, 2004, James Weil, Director of Aglet Consumer Alliance (Aglet), participated in a meeting with Cmmr. Brown in San Francisco. Also present were David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Mark Pocta for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Brian Cherry, Karen Tomcala, Patrick Golden, Bruce Smith and Jennifer Berman for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and Robert Finkelstein for The Utility Reform Network. Weil stated that Aglet supports the distribution and generation settlements that are the subject of the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan. Weil indicated that Aglet took a lead role in litigation of attrition issues. Weil noted that Aglet estimates that the two settlements will save ratepayers approximately $213 million during the years 2004, 2005 and 2006. Weil stated that the settlements are compromises of strongly held views. Weil explained that reliance on the Consumer Price Index rather than utility-specific escalation rates to calculate attrition allowances will benefit ratepayers. Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 28, 2004 Filed By: SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE Description: for acceptance of late-filed comments; comments attached. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: ORA/GILEAU/PUC Description: on ALJ Halligan's proposed decision on Phase I issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: on the proposed decision on stom and reliability issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: on the draft decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on proposed decision of ALJ Halligan. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Description: on Section 10.2 of the Proposed Decision re: The Diablo Canyon Independent Safety Committee. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SAFETY COMMITTEE Description: on the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Opening [on proposed interim opinion of ALJ Halligan] in the Storm/Reliability Performance Phase of the proceeding. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan on storm and reliability issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 26, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: opening; on proposed decision. Type: RULING Filing Date: April 23, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Sets final oral argument for May 4, 2004. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 22, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On April 19, 2004, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Mark Pocta for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), Karen Tomcala, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, Patrick Golden, Attorney, Bruce Smith, Manager, Revenue Requirements, and Janice Berman, Director, Rates & Tariffs, for PG&E, James Weil for Aglet Consumer Alliance (Aglet), and Robert Finkelstein for The Utility Reform Network (TURN). Written material (attached to the notice) was used. PG&E discussed the proposed decision. Tomcala stated that the distribution and generation settlements, including the attrition floors, represent a reasonable compromise of PG&E's, TURN's, ORA's, and Aglet's litigation positions and should be approved without modification, to preserve the balance of settlement parties' interests. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 22, 2004 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: On April 19, 2004, James Weil, Director of Aglet Consumer Alliance (Aglet), participated in a meeting with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Mark Pocta for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Brian Cherry, Karen Tomcala, Patrick Golden, Bruce Smith and Jennifer Berman for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and Robert Finkelstein for The Utility Reform Network. Weil stated that Aglet supports the distribution and generation settlements that are the subject of the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan. Weil indicated that Aglet took a lead role in litigation of attrition issues. Weil noted that Aglet estimates that the two settlements will save ratepayers approximately $213 million during the years 2004, 2005 and 2006. Weil stated that the settlements are compromises of strongly held views. Weil explained that reliance on the Consumer Price Index rather than utility-specific escalation rates to calculate attrition allowances will benefit ratepayers. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 22, 2004 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: On April 19, 2004, James Weil, Director of Aglet Consumer Alliance (Aglet), participated in a meeting with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, Mark Pocta for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Brian Cherry, Karen Tomcala, Patrick Golden, Bruce Smith and Jennifer Berman for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and Robert Finkelstein for The Utility Reform Network. Weil stated that Aglet supports the distribution and generation settlements that are the subject of the proposed decision of ALJ Halligan. Weil indicated that Aglet took a lead role in litigation of attrition issues. Weil noted that Aglet estimates that the two settlements will save ratepayers approximately $213 million during the years 2004, 2005 and 2006. Weil stated that the settlements are compromises of strongly held views. Weil explained that reliance on the Consumer Price Index rather than utility-specific escalation rates to calculate attrition allowances will benefit ratepayers. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 15, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On April 12, 2004, Brian Cherry, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Cherry discussed the proposed decision and stated that the Distribution and Generation settlements, including the attrition floors, represent a reasonable compromise of PG&E's, The Utility Reform Network's, and Aglet Consumer Alliance's litigation positions and should be approved without modification. Cherry stated that capital investment plans are not driven by the rate of inflation, and that attrition floors are a fair means to provide minimal funding for capital investments PG&E must make even during periods of no inflation or deflation. Type: PROPOSED DECISION Filing Date: April 6, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Interim opinion on storm and reliability issues. Comments are due April 26, 2004; reply comments - 5 days thereafter. Type: PROPOSED DECISION Filing Date: April 6, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Opinion: Phase I Issues. Comments are due April 26, 2004; reply comments - 5 days thereafter. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: March 29, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On March 24, 2004, Erik Jacobson, Chief of Regulatory Relations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Mark Pocta, Manager, Energy Cost of Service, for the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Patrick Golden, Attorney, Jan Berman, Director of Rates & Tariffs, for PG&E, and Robert Finkelstein, Executive Director, The Utility Reform Network. Golden described the issues covered by the GRC distribution and generation settlements. Golden stated that the Distributing Settlement resolves a number of customer service, accounting, record keeping and other issues raised by the settling parties. Berman explained the magnitude of revenue requirement reductions made in the settlements compared to PG&E's request. Berman stated that overall PG&E reduced its requested revenue requirement by approximately $67 million in the Generation Settlement, and an additional $305 million in the Distribution Settlement. Berman explained that the Commission decision regarding the pension contribution issue could affect these numbers. Type: REPORT Filing Date: February 27, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: regarding executive compensation and bonuses Type: RULING Filing Date: February 23, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC ALJ/MATTSON/PUC Description: Directs PG&E to file and serve a verified supplemental report on executive compensation within 4 days of this ruling. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: February 20, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Reply Comments to Comments of the Greenlining Institute, pursuant to ALJ's Ruling of February 3, 2004 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: February 18, 2004 Filed By: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: pursuant to the ALJ's ruling of February 3, 2004. Type: REPORT Filing Date: February 10, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with ALJ Ruling regarding executive compensation Type: MOTION Filing Date: February 6, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to revise ALJ Ruling regarding executive compensation Type: RULING Filing Date: February 3, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC ALJ/MATTSON/PUC Description: setting aside submission and taking further evidence regarding executive compensation and bonuses. Schedule: 2/10 - PG&E files/serves verified report; 2/18 - parties file/serve verified comments; 2/20 - parties file/serve verified reply comments; 2/24 - parties file/serve motions for evidentiary hearings; parties file/serve motions to strike; resubmission date if no motions for hearings are filed; 2/26 - parties file/serve responses to motions. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: January 30, 2004 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: Of Withdrawal of Motion Type: RULING Filing Date: January 15, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Responses to Motion to Delay Phase 2 of PG&E Company's General Rate Case shall be January 20, 2004. Electronic service of Responses is mandatory. Type: MOTION Filing Date: January 15, 2004 Filed By: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: to take Official Notice of PG&E's Undisclosed $83 Million Executive Bonuses and to Reopen Phase 1 of PG&E's General Rate Case. Type: MOTION Filing Date: January 7, 2004 Filed By: ORA/PUC PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Joint; to delay Phase 2. Type: RULING Filing Date: December 30, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Adopts modeling procedures; adopts the modeling procedures set forth in Attachment 1 and the attendant protective order set forth in Attachment 2, to assure the confidentiality of the Commission deliberative process. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: October 8, 2003 Filed By: ORA/GILEAU/PUC Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: October 8, 2003 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: reply. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: October 8, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply. Type: REPLY Filing Date: October 7, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT ORA/PUC PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: to DWR "Memorandum" to ALJ Halligan. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 3, 2003 Filed By: DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SAFETY COMMITTEE Description: On September 30, 2003, Dr. Gail de Planque, Chair of the Diablo Canyon Independent Safety Committee (DCISC), met with Pres. Peevey and Mike Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, in two separate meetings in San Francsico. At the meeting with Pres. Peevey, also present was Peter Arth, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and with Mike Campbell ? David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Steve Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood. Robert Rathie, counsel, and Diane L. Fellman, regulatory counsel, for DCISC, and representatives of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), and the Mothers for Peace, participated in both meetings. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Dr. de Planque stated that the Stipulation allowed for the Mothers for Peace issues concerning possible modification of the DCISC structure. Fellman indicated that the DCISC initiated the ex parte meeting due to the recent filing by the Mothers for Peace that violated the terms of the Stipulation. Dr. de Planque affirmed the DCISC?s support for the terms of the Stipulation and continuation of the DCISC at least until the next PG&E general rate case. De Planque expressed concern that the proposals of the Mothers for Peace to modify the DCISC structure were unclear and, if implemented, would contradict the character of the DCISC, as created under the original Diablo Canyon rate treatment settlement in D88-12-083, to act as a technical review committee rather than as a public advocate. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 2, 2003 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: On September 30, 2003, Truman Burns, Public Utilities Regulatory Analyst in the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Pres. Peevey and Mike Campbell, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, in two separate meetings in San Francisco. At the meeting with Pres. Peevey also present was Peter Arth, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and with Mike Campbell - Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, and David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Representatives from the Diablo Canyon Independent Safety Committee (DCISC), the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOM4P), and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) participated in both meetings. Burns spoke about ORA's support for the continuation of the DCISC and about three of the four requests made by the SLOM4P: a fourth member on the DCISC from the public, removing PG&E from the selection process of committee membership, and expanded outreach by the DCISC. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: October 1, 2003 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: reply. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: September 25, 2003 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: On September 23, 2003, Marc Joseph, attorney for the Coalition of California Utility Employees (CUE), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Art Carter, representing CUE. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Joseph stated that CUE and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) had reached a compromise on reliability performance incentives. Joseph stated that PG&E's reliability was bad and that average response time was getting worse. Joseph noted that PG&E was not subject to any existing reliability performance incentives and that CUE/PG&E proposal would require PG&E to meet increasingly stringent reliability benchmarks, and would be subject to rewards or penalties based on its performance. Joseph also described the additional revenue to be placed on a one-way balancing account to enable PG&E to meet the more stringent benchmarks, and how the proposal would return this money to ratepayers if PG&E's reliability does not improve. Type: RULING Filing Date: September 23, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/HALLIGAN/PUC Description: Shortens time for filing comments on the motion for approval of settlement agreement: comments are due by October 1, and reply comments - October 7, 2003. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: September 17, 2003 Filed By: ORA/GILEAU/PUC Description: opening. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: September 17, 2003 Filed By: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: opening. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: September 17, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: opening. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: September 17, 2003 Filed By: ADAMS, WILLIAM Description: opening; on revenue requirements issues. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: September 17, 2003 Filed By: SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE Description: opening. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: September 17, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: opening. Type: MOTION Filing Date: September 15, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL ORA/POCTA/PUC PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: for approval of Settlement Agreement. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: September 15, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL ORA/POCTA/PUC PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: to Shorten Time to Respond to this Request and to Comment on Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 13, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: Reply; on Electric Service Reliability Issues. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 11, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: Reply; on Storm and Reliability Issues. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 11, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Reply; in the Storm/Reliability Performance Phase of the 2003 GRC. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 11, 2003 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: Reply; on Reliability and Safety. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: August 11, 2003 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: Reply; on Storm and Reliability issues. Type: MOTION Filing Date: July 31, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ORA/PUC PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: joint; for approval of settlement agreement; settlement agreement attached. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 22, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: Opening; on Electric Service Reliability Issues. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 21, 2003 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: Opening; on reliability and safety. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 21, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Opening; in the Storm/Reliability Performance Phase of the 2003 GRC. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 21, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: Opening; on Storm and Reliability Issues. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: July 21, 2003 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: Opening; on Storm and Reliability Issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 20, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Description: in support of the Mothers for Peace Petition to Modify Decision 88-12-083 and Revise Appendix C. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: June 20, 2003 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: Reply; responding to the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Revised Petition to Modify Decision 88-12-083, Appendix C. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: June 20, 2003 Filed By: DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SAFETY COMMITTEE Description: to Revised Petition to Modify Decision 88-12-083 of the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: June 20, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Mothers for Peace Revised Petition to Modify Decision 88-12-083 and Revise Appendix C. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: May 28, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Greenlining Institute's expedited motion for full Commission Decision on inclusion of philanthropy and supplier diversity testimony in this general rate case. Type: EXHIBIT Filing Date: May 23, 2003 Filed By: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: Further Exhibits to the Expedited Motion Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 22, 2003 Filed By: THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: Expedited; for full Commission decision on the inclusion of Philathropy and minority procurement testimony to ensure consistency with the Ruling of the Commission in [the General Rate case of [SoCal Edison]. Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION Filing Date: May 22, 2003 Filed By: SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE Description: Amended; of D88-12-083. Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 20, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Joint; for six-month delay in Phase 2 of PG&E's 2003 General Rate Case. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: May 19, 2003 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: For the May 21, 2003 PHC Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 19, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: to strike testimony of market valuation Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 19, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to strike Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: May 19, 2003 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: in support of the Motion of Aglet to strike testimony on market valuation Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: May 15, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Motion of ORA for authorization to publicly release unredacted versions of testimony Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: May 9, 2003 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: to the Motion to Strike of PG&E Type: NOTICE Filing Date: May 8, 2003 Filed By: ORA/GILEAU/PUC Description: Advance Notice of Individual Ex parte Meeting With Commissioner Peevey. Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 5, 2003 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: for authorization to publicly release unredacted versions of testimony Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 5, 2003 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: for an order shortening time to file written responses to Motion to Publicly Release Unredacted Versions of Testimony Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 2, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to strike portions of ORA's April 11, 2003 Report Type: MOTION Filing Date: May 2, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for order shortening time to file written responses to motion to strike Type: RULING Filing Date: April 29, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/PRESTIDGE/PUC Description: Denies Petition of ENRG for supplemental phase, etc. Type: RULING Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/WONG/PUC Description: The Petition to Modify D88-12-083 is transferred from A00-11-038 et al, to A02-11-017, et al. Directs the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Pease to update their petition by filing a supplemental brief on May 23, 2003 in A02-11-017, et al. Reply briefs shall be filed by June 20, 2003. Type: RULING Filing Date: April 25, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: modifying schedule as follows: opening testimony should be served on May 2, 2003; rebuttal testimony should be served on May 16, 2003; parrties should provide additional information to assist in case management as described herein. Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 24, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SAFETY COMMITTEE MOTHERS FOR PEACE ORA/PUC PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: To Adopt Stipulation Type: RULING Filing Date: April 11, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: regarding requests to intervene and other procedural matters. PG&E should serve supplemental testimony on April 18, 2003; ORA should serve responsive testimony on April 28, 2003; other parties should serve responsive testimony on May 2, 2003. Type: RULING Filing Date: April 9, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: Regarding Notices Of Intent To Claim Compensationi Type: PETITION Filing Date: April 1, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CABLE AND TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION Description: to intervene Type: OPPOSITION Filing Date: March 28, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: To Petition of ENRG For Supplemental Phase of Proceeding Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: March 28, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Description: To the Petition of ENRG For Supplemental Phase of Proceeding or, in the Alternative, Institution of New Proceeding Type: PETITION Filing Date: March 13, 2003 Filed By: ENRG Description: for supplemental phase of proceeding or, in the alternative, institution of new proceeding. Type: REPORT Filing Date: March 10, 2003 Filed By: CPSD/AJELLO/PUC Description: Informational Report describing and analyzing data collected during General Order compliance inspections and investigation of electrical incidents. Type: MOTION Filing Date: March 7, 2003 Filed By: ENRG Description: to Intervene. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: February 27, 2003 Filed By: AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMER ASSOCIATION Description: of intent to claim compensation Type: NOTICE Filing Date: February 27, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: of intent to claim compensation Type: NOTICE Filing Date: February 27, 2003 Filed By: ADAMS, WILLIAM P. Description: of intent to claim compensation Type: NOTICE Filing Date: February 26, 2003 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER COOPERATIVE Description: of intent to claim compensation Type: NOTICE Filing Date: February 26, 2003 Filed By: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Description: to claim compensation Type: NOTICE Filing Date: February 26, 2003 Filed By: SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE Description: of intent to claim compensation Type: NOTICE Filing Date: February 18, 2003 Filed By: AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE Description: of intent to claim compensation Type: SCOPING RULING Filing Date: February 13, 2003 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Consolidates A02-11-017, I03-01-012, and A02-09-005; affirms that these are ratesetting proceedings; sets the following schedule for Phase I: 5/28/03 - evidentiary hrgs begin; 7/7/03 - opening briefs, 7/21/03 - reply briefs filed; PD on PG&E reliability performance - 10/23/03, PD - 12/19/03; comments on PD - 1/8/04; reply comments 1/13/04; decision - 2/5/04. Establishes electronic service rules. Pleadings may be filed with the Docket Office one day after their otherwise applicable due date provided that service is accomplished on the due date. Notices of intent to claim intervenor's compensation are due by February 27, 2003. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: January 24, 2003 Filed By: LATINO ISSUES FORUM THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: of intent to seek compensation. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 24, 2003 Filed By: LATINO ISSUES FORUM THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: for the 1/28/03 PHC. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 24, 2003 Filed By: DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SAFETY COMMITTEE Description: Prehearing Conference Statement. Type: MOTION Filing Date: January 24, 2003 Filed By: LATINO ISSUES FORUM THE GREENLINING INSTITUTE Description: and petition to intervene. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 24, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Prehearing Conference Statement. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 24, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Description: pursuant to the January 3, 2003 ruling of ALJ Cooke Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 24, 2003 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: pursuant to 1/3/03 ALJ Ruling. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 24, 2003 Filed By: ORA/PELEO/PUC Description: in accordance with the 1/3/03 ALJ Ruling. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: January 23, 2003 Filed By: MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT Description: pursuant to ALJ's Ruling, dated January 3, 2003 Type: PETITION Filing Date: January 8, 2003 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE LATINO ISSUES FORUM Description: to intervene Type: NOTICE Filing Date: January 8, 2003 Filed By: GREENLINING INSTITUTE LATINO ISSUES FORUM Description: of intent to seek compensation Type: RULING Filing Date: January 3, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: setting Prehearing Conference on January 28, 2003; prehearing conference statements due on January 24, 2003; as set forth Type: RULING Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: regarding PG&E's motion for leave to file materials under seal and setting forth conditions for access to computer models, data bases, programs and input data Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: December 27, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Proof of Publication For the General Rate Case Proceeding Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 23, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for Order Shortening Time to Respond to Petition for Modification. Type: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION Filing Date: December 23, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: of D89-01-040 (Rate Case Plan) to Delay Phase 2. Type: REPLY Filing Date: December 23, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to protests Type: RESOLUTION ALJ-176 CATEGORIZATION Filing Date: December 17, 2002 Filed By: COMR/PUC Description: Resolution ALJ 176-3103; Ratification of preliminary determinations of category adopted Type: PROTEST Filing Date: December 13, 2002 Filed By: MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT Description: to Application. Type: PROTEST Filing Date: December 13, 2002 Filed By: ORA/TUDISCO/PUC Description: to Application. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: December 13, 2002 Filed By: DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SAFETY COMMITTEE Description: to Application. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: November 27, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On November 27, 2002, Gordon Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), wrote a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Lynch, Brown, Duque, Peevey and Wood. Copies of the letter were also sent to Wesley Franklin, Executive Director, Paul Clanon, Director of the Energy Division, Gary Cohen, General Counsel, Regina Birdsell, Director of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, Peter Arth, Kevin Coughlan and Julie Fitch, advisors to Cmmr. Peevey, David Gamson, Belinda Gatti and Peter Hanson, advisors to Cmmr. Brown, Trina Horner and Robert Kinosian, advisor to Pres. Lynch, Bill Julian, Manuel Ramirez and Steven Weissman, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, and Laura Krannawitter and Lynne McGhee, advisors to Cmmr. Duque. The letter urges the Commission to take immediate action on a motion that PG&E filed on August 27, 2002, related to PG&E's 2003 general rate case application. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: November 25, 2002 Filed By: ORA/GILEAU/PUC Description: to motion of PG&E for leave to file materials under seal Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: November 25, 2002 Filed By: ORA/GILEAU/PUC Description: to motion of PG&E for protective order Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: November 13, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On November 8, 2002, Gordon Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), wrote a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Lynch, Brown, Duque, Peevey and Wood. Copies of the letter were also sent to Peter Arth, Kevin Coughlan and Julie Fitch, advisors to Cmmr. Peevey, David Gamson, Belinda Gatti, and Peter Hanson, advisors to Cmmr. Brown, Trina Horner and Robert Kinosian, advisors to Pres. Lynch, Bill Julian, Manuel Ramirez and Steven Weissman, advisors to Cmmr. Wood, Laura Krannawitter and Lynne McGhee, advisors to Cmmr. Duque, Wesley Franklin, Executive Director, Paul Clanon, Director of the Energy Division, Gary Cohen, General Counsel, and Regina Birdsell, Martin Lyons, and Patrick Gileau, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates. The letter states, among other things, that notwithstanding PG&E's request for increases in authorized electric distribution and generation-related revenues, PG&E is not seeking any increase in overall electric rates at this time. The letter states further that PG&E is requesting a gas rate increase, which would raise a typical residential customer's total gas bill by 4.1 percent. Type: APPLICATION Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for authority, among other things, to increase revenue requirements for electric and gas service and to increase rates and charges for gas service effective January 1, 2003. [Public Version] Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for leave to file materials under seal; confidential materials attached and filed under seal, namely: confidential vendor pricing information and sales proposals. Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for protective order pursuant to Rule 74.7.

Top of Page      Back to Top of Page
2000 State of California. Gray Davis, Governor. Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy | E-mail Webmaster