Proceeding I0606014
Date Filed: June 15, 2006
Status: Closed


Documents    Decisions    Main Index

LIST
Filer Requested Category:
Preliminary Category: Adjudicatory
Commission Designated Category: Adjudicatory
Filed By:
CPUC - EDISON

DOCUMENTS
Number of Documents: 65

Type: PROPOSED DECISION

Filing Date: April 7, 2009
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: Decision Adopting the Performance-Based Ratemaking Phase 2 Settlement Agreement. Opening Comments, which shall not exceed 15 pages, are due April 27, 2009. Reply Comments which shall not exceed 5 pages are due within 5 days after the last day to file Comments.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: January 27, 2009
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: Granting the Motion of Southern California Edison Company and Settling Parties to Shorten Time to File Comments on the Motion for Adoption of PBR Phase 2 Settlement Agreement. Schedule for filing comments is set forth in this ruling.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: January 22, 2009
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: for adoption of PBR Phase 2 Settlement Agreement (Settlement Agreement attached).

Type: REQUEST

Filing Date: November 24, 2008
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network
Description: for intervenor compensation for contributions to D.08-09-038.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: October 8, 2008
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: Setting Phase 2 Prehearing Conference for October 31, 2008.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: November 26, 2007
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: Regarding Pending Motions.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: November 15, 2007
Filed By:
DRA/HEIDEN/CPUC
Description: To Southern California Edison Company's Appeal of the Presiding Officer's Decision.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: November 15, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: To the Appeals of the Consumer Protection and Safety Division and the Greenlining Institute of the Presiding Officer's Phase 1 Decision.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: November 15, 2007
Filed By:
Consumer Protection and Safety Division
Description: In Opposition to Appeal of Southern California Edison Company of Presiding Officer's Phase I Decision.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: November 15, 2007
Filed By:
Greenlining Institute
Description: to Appeals of the Presiding Officer's Decision regarding Performance Based Ratemaking (PBR), Finding Violations of PBR Standards, Ordering Refunds, and Imposing a Fine.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: November 14, 2007
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network
Description: To Appeal of the Presiding Officer's Decision.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: November 9, 2007
Filed By:
CPSD/SHER/CPUC
Description: requesting that the Commission bar Southern California Edison Company from including in its response to appeals proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: November 6, 2007
Filed By:
CPSD/SHER/CPUC
Description: to Southern California Edison Company's Motion for Assigned Commissioner's Ruling barring modification of the scope of this proceeding to include the issue of whistleblower compensation.

Type: APPEAL

Filing Date: October 31, 2007
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: of the Presiding Officer's Decision regarding Performance Based Ratemaking (PBR), Finding Violations of PBR Standards, Ordering Refunds, and Imposing a Fine.

Type: APPEAL

Filing Date: October 31, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: of Presiding Officer's Phase 1 Decision.

Type: APPEAL

Filing Date: October 31, 2007
Filed By:
CPSD/SHER/CPUC
Description: of the Presiding Officer's Decision.

Type: NOTICE

Filing Date: October 24, 2007
Filed By:
CALJ/MINKIN/CPUC
Description: of Removal from Calendar.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: October 22, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: for Assigned Commissioner's ruling barring modification of the scope of this proceeding to include the issue of whistleblower compensation.

Type: REPLY

Filing Date: October 19, 2007
Filed By:
Consumer Protection and Safety Division
Description: To Response of Southern California Edison Company.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: October 18, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: For Oral Argument Before Commission on Its Appeal of the Presiding Officer's Phase 1 Decision.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: October 12, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: To CPSD Motion for Indefinite Suspension of Phase 2.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: October 5, 2007
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: Regarding Consumer Protection and Safety Division's Letter of October 4, 2007. Parties may file and serve responses on or before October 12, 2007. All parties may reply to responses on or before October 19, 2007.

Type: PRESIDING OFFICERS DECISION

Filing Date: October 1, 2007
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: Decision Regarding Performance Based Ratemaking (PBR), Finding Violations of PBR Standards, Ordering Refunds, and Imposing a Fine. Any party to this adjudicatory proceeding may file and serve an Appeal of the Presiding Officer's Decision within 30 days of the date of issuance (i.e., the date of mailing) of this decision. In addition, any Commissioner may request review of the Presiding Officer's Decision by filing and serving a Request for Review within 30 days of the date of issuance.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: June 15, 2007
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: Setting Phase 2 Prehearing Conference for September 27, 2007.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: March 29, 2007
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: in Opposition to Motion of SCE to Strike Portions of the Opening and Reply Briefs of the Greenlining Institute.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: March 23, 2007
Filed By:
CPSD/SHER/CPUC
Description: in Opposition to Motion to Strike Portions of the Reply Brief of CPSD.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: March 20, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: to Strike Portions of the Opening and Reply Briefs of the Greenlining Institute.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: March 15, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: to Strike Portions of the Reply Brief of CPSD.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: March 6, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: in Opposition to Motion of Division of Ratepayer Advocates to Strike.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: February 26, 2007
Filed By:
DRA/HEIDEN/CPUC
Description: to Strike Portions of the Reply Brief of Southern California Edison Company or, alternatively, to File the Accompanying Two-Page Supplement to the DRA Reply Brief (Supplement attached).

Type: RULING

Filing Date: February 21, 2007
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: regarding Greenlining Institute's motion for reconsideration of ALJ Barnett's denial of motion to offer documents into evidence and motion to compel.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: February 14, 2007
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: Reply

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: February 14, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: Reply

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: February 14, 2007
Filed By:
CPUC/DRA/HEIDEN
Description: Reply

Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING

Filing Date: February 14, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: Executive Summary of Reply Brief.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: February 14, 2007
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network
Description: Reply;

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: February 14, 2007
Filed By:
UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 246
Description: Reply;

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: February 14, 2007
Filed By:
CPSD/MOLDAVSKY/CPUC
CPSD/SHER/CPUC
Description: Reply

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: February 13, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: Opposition to the Greenlining Institute Motion for Reconsideration of ALJ Barnett's Denial of Motion to Offer Documents into Evidence and Motion to Compel.

Type: AMENDMENT

Filing Date: February 1, 2007
Filed By:
DRA/MOLDAVSKY
DRA/SHER/CPUC
Description: to the Opening Brief of CPSD.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: February 1, 2007
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: re motions of the Greenlining Institute. Greenlining Institute's motion to file an amended opening brief is granted. This ruling memorializes ALJ's ruling of January 29, 2007, which denied Greenlining Institute's motion to compel filed Decembeer 19, 2006 and Greenlining Institute's motion to offer documents in evidence filed December 21, 2006.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: February 1, 2007
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: for Reconsideration of ALJ Barnett Denial of Greenlining Institute Motion to Offer Documents into Evidence and Motion to Compel.

Type: REPLY

Filing Date: February 1, 2007
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: to Opposition of its Amended Opening Brief.

Type: REPLY

Filing Date: January 30, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison
Description: Opposition to Motion of the Greenlining Institute to File an Amended Opening Brief.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: January 26, 2007
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: Amended, Opening.

Type: AMENDMENT

Filing Date: January 23, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: to Opening Brief.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: January 18, 2007
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: Opening. (Late-Filing approved by ALJ Barnett).

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: January 17, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: Opening.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: January 17, 2007
Filed By:
DRA/HEIDEN/CPUC
Description: Opening

Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING

Filing Date: January 17, 2007
Filed By:
Southern California Edison Company
Description: Executive Summary of Opening Brief.

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: January 17, 2007
Filed By:
CPSD/MOLDOVSKY/CPUC
CPSD/SHER/CPUC
Description: Opening

Type: BRIEF

Filing Date: January 17, 2007
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network
Description: Opening; concerning thr Fraud and Manipulation of Edison Customer Satisfaction Survey Results.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: December 21, 2006
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: to Offer Documents Into Evidence.

Type: LAW & MOTION

Filing Date: December 19, 2006
Filed By:
The Greenlining Institute
Description: MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES FROM O'MELVENY & MEYERS AND EDISON TO GREENLINING'S REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS AT THE NOVEMBER 20, 2006 HEARING.

Type: TRANSCRIPT

Filing Date: December 4, 2006
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
Description: Submitted; Volume 10.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: November 15, 2006
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: THAT TURN AND GREENLINING INSTITUTE ARE ELIGIBLE FOR COMPENSATION IN THIS PROCEEDING.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: October 23, 2006
Filed By:
The Utility Reform Network
Description: for an Extension in Due Date for Rebuttal Testimony.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: August 24, 2006
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: Setting Hearing.

Type: NOTICE

Filing Date: August 24, 2006
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
Description: of Intent to Seek Compensation.

Type: NOTICE

Filing Date: August 17, 2006
Filed By:
GREENLINING INSTITUTE
Description: of Intent to Claim Compensation.

Type: RULING

Filing Date: July 10, 2006
Filed By:
ALJ/BARNETT/CPUC
Description: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING GRANTING MOTION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U-338 E) REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE CPSD REPORT AND OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS.

Type: RESPONSE

Filing Date: July 6, 2006
Filed By:
CPUC/CPSD/SHER
Description: RESPONSE OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION AND SAFETY DIVISION (CPSD) TO MOTION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE CPSD REPORT AND OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS.

Type: MOTION

Filing Date: June 29, 2006
Filed By:
Southern California Edison
Description: REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF CPSD REPORT AND OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS [in compliance with the OII]

Type: NOTICE

Filing Date: June 21, 2006
Filed By:
CALJ/MINKIN/PUC
Description: of prehearing conference.

Type: COMMISSION INVESTIGATION

Filing Date: June 15, 2006
Filed By:
CPUC - EDISON
Description: Investigation on the Commission's Own Motion into the practices of Southern California Edison Company to determine the violations of the laws, rules and regulations governing performance based ratemaking, its monitoring and reporting to the Commission, refunds to customers and other relief, and future performance based ratemaking for this utility.

DECISIONS
Number of Decisions: 6

Decision Number: D0905027

Rendered Date: May 21, 2009
Effective Date: May 21, 2009
Description: Adopts the performance-based ratemaking Phase 2 Settlement Agreement; and closes proceeding.

Decision Number: D0903022

Rendered Date: March 12, 2009
Effective Date: March 12, 2009
Description: Grants request of the Utility Reform Network for intervenor compensation for substantial contribution to Decision 08-09-038.

Decision Number: D0811022

Rendered Date: November 6, 2008
Effective Date: November 6, 2008
Description: Extends statutory deadline.

Decision Number: D0809038

Rendered Date: September 18, 2008
Effective Date: September 18, 2008
Description: Regards Performance Based Ratemaking (PBR), finds violations of PBR standards, orders refunds, and imposes a fine.

Decision Number: D0711044

Rendered Date: November 16, 2007
Effective Date: November 16, 2007
Description: Extends statutory deadline until December 19, 2008.

Decision Number: D0706008

Rendered Date: June 7, 2007
Effective Date: June 7, 2007
Description: Extends statutory deadline until December 20, 2007.

Top of Page    Documents    Decisions    Main Index