|
Number of Documents: 4022
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
directs that the Petitiion for Modification of Decision 94-09-065 filed by XO
California, Inc. and ICG Telecom Group, Inc. on 8/6/2001 be filed as a new
application (Corrected)
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2001
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
This filing cancelled per ALJ Weishmehl's Ruling dated August 29, 2001. (This
filing originally appeared on the August 8, 2001 Daily Calendar.)
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
directs that the Petition for Modification of Decision 94-09-064 filed by XO
California, Inc. and ICG Telecom Group, Inc. on 8/6/2001 be filed as a new
application
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Summary: On August 2, 2001, Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel of the
Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), had a telephone conversation with Robert
Wullenjohn, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Lee-Whei Tan, ORA Regulatory Analyst, also
participated in the discussion. ORA stated that Pacific Bell (PacBell) has not
responded to discovery initiated by ORA. ORA stated that PacBell objected on
several grounds foremost of which being that ORA does not have discovery rights
in the absence of an open proceeding related to the audit.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Summary: On July 11, 2001, Cynthia Marshall, Senior Vice President ?
Regulatory & Constituency Relations of Pacific Bell Telephone Company
(PacBell), initiated a telephone communication to Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr.
Bilas. In the communication also participated Yvette Hogue, Executive Director
? Regultory Matters of PacBell. PacBell representatives stated that the Office
of Ratepayer Advocates has engaged in an unauthorized audit of PacBell, in that
they have made discovery requests that goes beyond the ?shadow? audit and the
scope of the Commission approved audit. PacBell urged the Commission to adopt
the alternate of Cmmr. Duque, which modifies that language in decision
01-02-041.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Summary: LATE FILED. On July 10, 2001, Cynthia Marshall, Senior Vice President
? Regulatory & Constituency Relations of Pacific Bell Telephone Company
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Brown in San Francisco. Also present was James Young,
General Attorney and Assistant to General Counsel of PacBell. PacBell
representatives stated that the Office of Ratepayer Advocates has engaged in an
unauthorized audit of PacBell, in that they have made discovery requests that
goes beyond the ?shadow? audit and the scope of the Commission approved audit.
PacBell urged the Commission to adopt the alternate of Cmmr. Duque, which
modifies that language in decision 01-02-041.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply; on the draft decision of ALJ Weismehl
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Summary: On July 5, 2001, Regina Birdsell, Director of the Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present was
Jonathan Lakritz, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, and Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General
Counsel, ORA. ORA representatives stated that ORA supports the draft decision
and opposes the alternate. ORA explained that Pacific Bell has declined to
discuss any specific objections it may have to ORA's discovery on the new
regulatory framework audit based on its interpretation of D01-02-041 that bars
ORA discovery prior to the commencement of a proceeding. ORA stated that the
alternate does not resolve this legal issue. ORA explained that the alternate
would limit ORA's pre-proceeding discovery on the audit. ORA maintained that,
to the extent Pacific Bell has a specific objection to ORA's discovery and such
dispute cannot be informally resolved, section 309.5(e) provides for formal
resolution of such disputes.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Duque
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Duque
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Summary: On July 3, 2001, Regina Birdsell, Director, Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Duque and Cmmr. Lynch in two separate meetings
in San Francisco. Also present at the meeting with Cmmr. Duque were Lynne
McGhee and Fassil Fenikile, advisors to Cmmr. Duque, and Lee-Whei Tan, Public
Utility Regulatory Analyst of ORA. At the meeting with Cmmr. Lynch also present
was Trina Horner, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch. Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General
Counsel of ORA, participated in both meetings. Written material (attached to
the notice) was used. ORA stated that it opposes the alternate decision
regarding ORA?s petition to modify D01-02-041. ORA explained that Pacific Bell
has declined to discuss any specific objections it may have to ORA?s discovery
on the new regulatory framework audit based on its interpretation of D01-02-041
that bars ORA discovery prior to the commencement of a proceeding. ORA stated
that the alternate does not resolve this legal issue. ORA explained that, to
the extent Pacific Bell has a specific objection to ORA?s discovery requests
and such dispute cannot be informally resolved, section 309.5(e) provides for
formal resolution of such disputes.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Summary: On July 3, 2001, Regina Birdsell, Director, Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Brown in San Francisco. Also present was Robert
Wullenjohn, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Thomas Lew, Program Manager, and Hallie
Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel, of ORA. Written material (attached to the
notice) was used. ORA stated that it supports the draft decision regarding
ORA?s petition to modify D01-02-041 and opposes the alternate decision. ORA
explained that Pacific Bell has declined to discuss any specific objections it
may have to ORA?s discovery on the new regulatory framework audit based on its
interpretation of D01-02-041 that bars ORA discovery prior to the commencement
of a proceeding. ORA stated that the alternate does not resolve the legal
issue, which is the issue raised by ORA?s petition. ORA stated that the
alternate would prohibit ORA from conducting discovery in the matter of the
audit of Pacific Bell. ORA stated that ORA is fully expected to litigate the
matter. ORA explained that its discovery is focused on matters of particular
ratepayer interest and not duplicative of the audit being conducted by the
Telecommunications Division.
|
|
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 2001
|
Filed By:
CMMR/DUQUE/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments are due by July 9, 2001; no reply comments accepted.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 2, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ granting Petition for Modification of Decision
No.01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 2, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the Draft Decision of ALJ Weismehl
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
Parties may file comments by July 2, 2001; reply comments - within 5 days after
comments are filed.
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 24, 2001
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to response of Pacific Bell to TURN's request for an award of compensation
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to The Utility Reform Network's Request for Compensation
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 2001
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for an award of compensation for substantial contribution to D.01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
OBJECTION
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
and response to the Petition of ORA to modify D01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 2001
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of the ORA to modify D01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 5, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
rules that responses to ORA's 3/1/2001 petition for modification of D.01-02-041
shall be filed by 3/8/2001.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
|
|
Description:
to request an Order shortening time for responses to its February 21, 2001
Petition to Modify D01-02-041 and expediting decision on the Petition to Modify
D01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
|
|
Description:
of Decision No. 01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to the supplement to joint application for rehearing of D00-02-047 of the ORA
and TURN
|
|
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to joint application for rehearing of D.00-02-047
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 2000
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
authorizing the filing of supplements to applications for rehearing [Text
(Summary only): On or before 11-3-2000, parties may file a supplement to their
application for rehearing of D.00-02-047 or an initial application for
rehearing if no prior application for rehearing was filed. Responses to any
supplements or initial applications for rehearing may be filed by 11-10-2000.
END. GML.]
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply Comments on ALJ Redd's Draft Decision dated 6/6/00
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on draft decision regarding Pacific's petition to modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 2000
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
on draft decision of ALJ Reed regarding PacBell's petition to modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
June 6, 2000
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion. Mailed 06/06/2000. [Comments are due no later than 06/26/2000; Reply
Comments are due no later than 07/03/2000.MMN.]
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments in Response to April 21, 2000 ALJ's Ruling.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Comments on the April 21, 2000 ALJ's Ruling.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2000
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
ALJ's Ruling. [Text: (1) On or before May 12, 2000, parties may file comments
indicating any significant reasons they believe exist to keep this docket open
and active other than consideration of the currently pending application for
rehearing of Decision 00-02-047; (2) On or before May 12, 2000, parties may
file comments responding to the questions above concerning the need and
repository for mailing lists currently derived from the service list for this
proceeding. END.MMN.]
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Response to the Joint Application for Rehearing of D00-02-047 of the Office of
Ratepayer Advocates and the Utility Reform Network.
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of D00-02-047
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 22, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
On February 16, 2000, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates caused to be
hand-delivered to Commissioners Bilas, Duque, Neeper, Wood and Lynch, to their
Telecommunications Advisors and to the Chief ALJ Lynn T. Carew, a three page
letter signed by Terry R. Mowrey, Senior Manager. A copy of said letter is
attached.
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 2000
|
Filed By:
ALJ/JONES/PUC
|
|
Description:
Draft Decision. [Comments are due no later than 03/06/2000; Reply Comments are
due no later than 03/13/2000.]
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: On February 1, 2000 @ 2:00 p.m., at the CPUC in San Francisco, the
following person(s) met with Lester Wong, Advisor to Commissioner Bilas, to
wit: Janice Grau, Esq., of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates ("ORA") and
Lee-Whei Tan, Project Coordinator, ORA.
ORA advised it opposed the Revised
Draft Decision ("RDD") and observed that it conflicted with Commissioner Bilas'
Ruling on the bias issue in the PG&E General Rate Case. Adoption of the RDD
could handicap ORA in future investigations and discredit statistical and other
analytical proposals presented by ORA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2000
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
On February 8, 2000, Thomas Long, Senior Telecommunications Attorney for The
Utility Reform Network ("TURN"), caused to be hand-delivered a letter addressed
to each of the five Commissioners with copies to each of the Commissioner's
telecommunications Advisors. A copy of said letter is attached.
Mr. Long
encouraged the Commission to avoid the appearance-of-bias analysis in the
Alternate Decision sponsored by Commissioner Duque in that the evidence relied
upon for the finding of bias would disqualify practically every consultant who
appears before the Commission. He also noted that the focus of D.96-05-036 was
to retain an auditor who lacked a conflict of interest with Pacific Bell, not
to screen out all auditors who could be deemed to have an appearance of bias
against it. He finally explained that the Commission is in danger of missing
its third statutory deadline for completing the audit.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
February 10, 2000
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Comments on the Alternate Draft Decision of Commssioner Lynch Regarding the
Audit of Pacific Bell that was Required over Five Years Ago in Decision
94-06-011.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 10, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 7, 2000, Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, initiated a written
ex parte contact with Commissioner Bilas and his Advisors, Dorothy Duda and
Lester Wong, by causing to be delivered to them at the CPUC in San Francisco a
transmittal note and a copy of a letter and attachments sent to Commissioner
Lynch on January 28, 2000, copies of which are attached. Said letter was sent
to Commissioner Lynch to provide her with background and material facts
relevant to the dispute around ORA's proposed Section 314.5 audit.
One of the
points made in said letter was that the advocacy audit which Ora seeks to
perform goes well beyond the statute and is not in compliance with the
Commission's specific directives, which ordered an independent audit of the
books and records on an accounting, not advocacy, basis.
The letter to
Commissioner Lynch also highlighted sections of Decision 96-05-036 and copies
of two previous correspondences with the Commission. One letter was dated July
13, 1999 from J.W. Callaway, President, Pacific Telesis Group, to Commissioner
Hyatt and the other, a letter dated July 22, 1999 from Bill Blase to
Commissioner Hyatt. Mr. Callaway's letter expressed concerns with the proposed
audit and asked that no audit be conducted because (1) The Commission has
exempted most providers from this requirement; (2) the scope of the audit goes
well beyond the guidelines set forth in Decision 96-05-036 and Section 314.5;
(3) Ora and its selected contractors cannot be objective in that they have
repeatedly taken positions adverse to Pacific Bell in the past; and (4) if an
audit should be performed, it should be done by the Telecommunications
Division. ...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 3, 2000 @ 10:00 a.m., at the CPUC in San Francisco, the following
persons met with Commissioner Wood and his Advisor, Jonathan Lakritz, to wit:
Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, who initiated the meeting, Cynthia
Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell and Dan McCarthy, General
Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group. A written handout, copy attached, was used at
the meeting.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Pacific Bell's concerns
with ORA's planned Section 314.5 audit and to support Commissioner Duque's
Revised Draft Decision. Mr. McCarthy indicated there was sufficient evidence in
the record to support reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications
Division. He also stated that Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision
properly concluded that Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D.94-06-011 was
timely and should be granted.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 2, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, initiated a contact with Commissioner
Lynch by causing to be delivered to her at the CPUC in San Francisco his letter
dated January 28, 2000, a copy of which , including all attachments, is
appended hereto. The purpose of said letter was to provide Commissioner Lynch
with background and material facts relevant to the current dispute around ORA's
proposed Section 314.5 audit of Pacific Bell.
The salient points of Mr.
Blase's letter and attachments were that the advocacy audit which ORA seeks to
perform goes well beyond the statute and is not in compliance with the
Commission' specific directives. The audit that the Commission ordered was an
independent audit of the books and records on an accounting basis, not an
advocacy audit. By Commission order, lengthy policy discussions were not
considered to be properly part of the audit. As demonstrated in an attached
summary and attached, highlighted (underlined) copies of ORA's RFP and Overland
Consulting's audit proposal, the advocacy audit that ORA proposes goes well
beyond the scope of the audit that the Commission ordered.
Mr. Blase's letter
also provided highlighted sections from Decision 96-05-036 and copies of two
previous correspondences with the Commission (both of which were timely
reported as ex parte communications) on this matter in the form of a letter
dated July 13, 1999 from J.W. Callaway, President, Pacific Telesis Group, to
Commissioner Hyatt and a letter dated July 22, 1999 from Bill Blase to
Commissioner Hyatt.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 1, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFI C BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 27, 2000, at 11:30 a.m., at the CPUC in San Francisco, the following
persons met with Commissioner Duque and his Advisors, Lynne McGhee and Tim
Sullivan, to wit: Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, who initiated the
meeting, Cynthia Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell and Dan
McCarthy, General Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group, A written handout (copy
attached) was used during the communication.
The purpose of the contact was to
discuss Pacific Bell's concerns with ORA's planned Section 314.5 audit of
Pacific Bell and to support Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision. Mr.
McCarthy indicated there was sufficent evidence in the record to support
reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications Division. He indicated
that Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision properly concluded that
Pacific Bell?s Petition to Modify D.94-06-011 was timely and should be granted.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 1, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 27, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, who
initiated this oral ex parte communication, met with Commissioner Lynch at the
CPUC in San Francisco. A written handout (copy attached) was used during the
communication.
The purpose of the contact was to discuss Pacific Bell's
concerns with the proposed Section 314.5 audit of Pacific Bell and to support
Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision. Mr. Blase reviewed the procedural
history of this matter and also indicated there was extensive evidence to
support the reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications Division. Using
the handout, he stated that extensive information (approximately 50,000 pages)
was already provided in this and other proceedings and was available for review
of affiliate transactions and other areas in the ORA proposed audit.
Mr. Blase
stated that this was a unique situation in that there are multiple instances
where ORA's proposed audit scope has exceeded that ordered by the Commission.
For the many reasons outlined in Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision,
he urged that Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify was timely filed and cited
evidence that was not available until 1999.
Finally, Mr. Blase noted that the
performance of an audit of the books and records of Pacific Bell should be an
objective review, which was not possible given the auditors selected by ORA.
The audit should also comport with the scope of the statute and evaluate the
books and records only of Pacific Bell. The Commission should select and
entrust the management of this audit to a staff organization within the
Commission that will be seen as objective and fair under the unique
circumstances of this case. Etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 26, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell,
Cynthia Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell and Dan McCarthy,
General Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group met Commissioner Bilas and Commissioner
Advisors Dorothy Duda and Lester Wong at the CPUC in San Francisco. The oral ex
parte communication was initiated by Mr. Blase and a written handout (copy
attached) was used during the communication.
The purpose of the contact was to
discuss Pacific Bell's concerns with ORA's planned section 314.5 audit of
Pacific Bell and to support Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision. Mr.
McCarthy indicated there was sufficient evidence in the record to support
reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications Division. He stated (using
the attached handout) that extensive information (approximately 50,000 pages)
was already provided in this and other proceedings and was available for review
of affiliate transactions and other areas in the planned audit. Mr. McCarthy
indicated that Commissioner's Duque's Revised Draft Decision properly concluded
that Pacific Bell's Petition To Modify D.94-06-011 was timely and should be
granted. He noted that the performance of the audit was the Commission's
responsibility and asked that the Commission consider which staff organization
within the Commission would have the ability to conduct a fair and objective
audit of Pacific Bell under the unique circumstances of this case.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Notice of Ex Parte Communication. On January 26, 2000 @ 9:30 a.m., Bill Blase,
President Pacific Bell, Cynthia Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific
Bell and Dan McCarthy, General Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group, met with
Commissioner Neeper at the CPUC in San Francisco. The oral ex parte
communication was initiated by Mr. Blase. The purpose of the contact was to
discuss Pacific Bell's concerns with ORA's planned section 314.5 audit of
Pacific Bell and to support Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision. Mr.
McCarthy indicated there was sufficient evidence in the record to support
reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications Division. Mr. McCarthy
indicated that Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision properly concluded
that Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D.94-06-011 was filed in a timely manner
and should be granted.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 26, 2000 @ 9:30 a.m., Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, Cynthia
Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell and Dan McCarthy, General
Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group, met with Commissioner Neeper at the CPUC in
San Francisco. The oral ex parte communication was initiated by Mr. Blase. The
purpose of the contact was to discuss Pacific Bell's concerns with ORA's
planned section 314.5 audit of Pacific Bell and to support Commissioner Duque's
Revised Draft Decision. Mr. McCarthy indicated there was sufficient evidence in
the record to support reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications
Division. Mr. McCarthy indicated that Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft
Decision properly concluded that Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D.94-06-011
was filed in a timely manner and should be granted.
|
|
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 2000
|
Filed By:
CMMR/LYNCH/PUC
|
|
Description:
Draft Decision of Commissioner Loretta Lynch (Mailed 01/21/00) Denying the
Petition for Modification of Decision D94-06-011 filed June 10, 1999 by Pacific
Bell. Parties to the proceeding may serve and file their comments to this
Alternate Draft Decision no later than 02/10/2000. Reply Comments should be
filed and served by 02/15/2000. An original and four (4) copies of the Comments
and Reply Comments with a Certificate of Service shall be filed with the
Commission's Docket Office with copies served on all parties on the same day of
filing. The Commissioners and ALJ Weismehl shall be served separately by
overnight service.
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 2000
|
Filed By:
COMMR/DUQUE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Revised Draft Decision of Commr Duque.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 14, 2000
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
On January 11, 2000, Thomas Long, Senior Telecommunications Attorney, for The
Utility Reform Network (TURN), met with Cmmr. Bilas, in San Francisco. Also
present were Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; and Paul Stein, Staff
Attorney, for TURN. Long made the following points in support of the draft
decision (DD) of ALJ Weismehl and in opposition to the DD of Cmmr. Duque. Long
also stated that as a matter of equity, supervision of the Pacific Bell audit
should remain with the Office of the Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) because the GTEC
audit already well underway, is being supervised by ORA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On January 7, 2000, Tom Lew, Project Manager, for the Office of the Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Wood, in San Francisco. Also present were
Jonathan Lakritz, advisor to Cmmr. Wood; Lee-Whei Tan, Project Coordinator and
Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel, for ORA. A written materials were
provided and attached to the notice. ORA representatives stated that the
Pacific Bell audit would be the first in more than ten years and would provide
cost information relevant to proceedings in which rates, prices of services, or
value of assets are at issue. ORA representatives also stated that the audit
scope in the Request of Proposal (RFP) complies with the instruction of the
Executive Director as reflected in the September 18, 1998, a letter from the
Executive Director to ORA's Director, which ORA provided and attached to the
notice
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on DD
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to comments of ORA, TURN, and UCAN on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on Alt. DD
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 31, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 28, 1999, Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel, representing
the Office of the Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Neeper and Fassil
Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper, in San Francisco. David Morse, Senior
Manager, representing ORA participated by telephone. A written material was
provided and attached to the notice. ORA representatives stated that it
supports the analysis and conclusion of Administrative Law Judge Weismehl's
Alternate Decision (AD) which would affirm that ORA should continue to perform
the audit of Pacific Bell. ORA representatives also stated that, although it
disagrees with the result of the Draft Decision (DD) of Cmmr. Duque, that would
transfer responsibility for the audit to the Telecommunications Division (TD),
that determination is one of policy and subject to the Commission's direction.
ORA representatives stated that, in relying on its determinations that ORA did
not comply with the Commission orders to reach its result, the DD grievously
errs as a matter of fact and law. ORA representatives that, if the Commission
determines to transfer the audit responsibility to TD, ORA will nonetheless
need to perform a "shadow" audit in order to effectively participate in this
proceeding.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on ALT DD of ALJ Weismehl
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the Alternate DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on DD of Cmmr. Duque
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1999
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 21, 1999, David Morse, Senior Manager, on behalf of the Office of
the Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Wood, in San Francisco. Also
present were Jonathan Lakritz, advisor to Cmmr. Wood; and Hallie Yacknin,
Assistant General Counsel, for ORA. ORA stated that it supports the analysis
and conclusion of ALJ Weismehl's Alternate Decision (AD), which affirm that ORA
should continue to perform the audit of Pacific Bell. ORA stated that the
scope issues the DD raises (the sale of Bellcore and the merger between SBC and
Ameritech) were not included in ORA's Request for Proposal or otherwise
included in ORA's audit plan. ORA also stated that if the audit is transferred
to TD, Pacific Bell should be required to reimburse the Commission for ORA's
consulting costs in conducting such a shadow audit.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1999
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1999
|
Filed By:
FILIPINOS FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
KOREAN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA
OAKLAND CHINESE COMMUNITY COUNCIL
OAKLAND CITIZENS' COM./URBAN RENEWAL
SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE
SPANISH SPEAKING CITIZENS' FOUNDATION
|
|
Description:
to Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
Joint; to Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 16, 1999, Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel, on behalf of
the Office of the Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), had a telephone communication with
Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, in San Francisco. ORA stated that it
stopped work on the Pacific Bell audit pending resolution of the Pacific Bell
motion to remove the audit to Telecommunications Division at the request of the
Executive Director and in consideration of the practical difficulty and
incremental costs that would be incurred in attempting to conduct the audit
over Pacific Bell's objections.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 14, 1999, David Morse, Project Manager and Hallie Yacknin,
Assistant General Counsel, on behalf of the Office of Ratepayer's (ORA), met
with Cmmr. Bilas, and Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas. And on the same
day, met with Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco. At
the meeting with Sullivan, Lynne McGhee, Staff Attorney for ORA, participated.
ORA stated that it supports the analysis and conclusion of ALJ Weismehl's
Alternate Draft Decision, which would affirm that ORA should continue to
perform the audit of Pacific Bell. ORA also stated that although it disagrees
with the result of the Draft Decision (DD) of Cmmr. Duque that would transfer
responsibility for the audit to the Telecommunications Division (TD), that
determination is appropriately one of policy and subject to the Commission's
discretion. ORA stated that, nonetheless, the DD grievously errs as a matter
of fact and law in its discussion and findings that ORA did not comply with
Commission direction regarding scope of the audit and consultant conflict of
interest. ORA also stated that, if the audit is transferred to TD, Pacific
Bell should be required to reimburse the Commission for ORA's consulting costs
in conducting such a shadow audit. In addition, during the meeting Sullivan,
ORA stated that the scope issues the DD raises (the sale of Bellcore and the
merger between SBC and Ameritech) were not included in ORA's Request for
Proposal or otherwise included in ORA's audit plan. ORA stated that DD claims
that D96-05-036's rejection of ORA's audit plan for lack of specificity
evidences ORA's failure to comply with Commission orders regarding scope of the
audit.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 13, 1999, Dr. Lee L. Selwyn of Economics and Technology, Inc. (ETI)
a subcontractor in the contract between California Public Utilities Commission
and Overland Consulting pursuant to the Office of Ratepayer's (ORA) Request for
Proposal (RFP), wrote a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Bilas, Cmmr.
Duque, Cmmr. Neeper, Cmmr. Hyatt, and Cmmr. Wood, in San Francisco. A copy of
the letter was also hand-delivered to Administrative Law Judge Phil J.
Weismehl. In the letter, Selwyn responds to allegation of bias made against
Selwyn and his firm by Pacific Bell which Selwyn stated are unfounded and
without merit. Selwyn states that ETI received ORA's RFPs and determined ETI
could contribute to the audit in the areas of affiliate relationships and
transactions and monitoring reports. Selwyn states that if the contract
between the Commission and Overland is abrogated, ETI, Overland and the other
team members will all have sustained economic harm which could have been
avoided had Pacific Bell filed its Petition for Modification earlier.
|
|
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
draft decision; comments are due 12/27; reply comments due 1/3/2000
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
CMMR/DUQUE/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments are due 12/27; reply comments due 1/3/2000
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/ULMER/PUC
|
|
Description:
On September 1, 1999, Andrew Ulmer, Attorney for the Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Norman Low, advisor to Cmmr. Wood. On the same day,
Ulmer met with Kim Malcolm, advisor to Cmmr. Hyatt, in San Francisco. Both
meetings, also present were Tommy Lew, Program Manager and Lee-Whei Tan,
Regulatory Analyst IV, both from ORA. Written materials were used and attached
to the notice. Ulmer stated at the meeting, that the August 6, 1999 Memorandum
from the Executive Director to the Commission misstated the requirements of the
Pacific Bell audit which ORA intends to conduct. Ulmer further stated that the
Commission never required an ?objective? audit. In the audit ordered in
Decision (D.) 94-06-011 and affirmed by D.96-05-036 is an advocacy audit to
protect ratepayers as Pacific Bell moves from cost of service regulation to an
incentive based regulatory framework. Ulmer stated that if the
Telecommunications Division provided the results of the audit in an advisory
capacity, the process would frustrate the purpose of the audit to protect the
public interest by removing the results from a public forum. Ulmer stated that
it is the Division best situated to conduct the audit because of the complexity
of Pacific Bell?s operations and the competitive framework in which it operates.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/ULMER/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On August 31, 1999, Andrew Ulmer, Attorney for the Office of
Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, in San
Francisco. Also present were Dorothy Duda, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; Tommy Lew,
Program Manager and Lee-Whei Tan, Regulatory Analyst IV, both from ORA.
Written materials were used and attached to the notice. Ulmer stated at the
meeting, that the August 6, 1999 Memorandum from the Executive Director to the
Commission misstated the requirements of the Pacific Bell audit which ORA
intends to conduct. Ulmer further stated that the Commission never required an
?objective? audit. In the audit ordered in Decision (D.) 94-06-011 and
affirmed by D.96-05-036 is an advocacy audit to protect ratepayers as Pacific
Bell moves from cost of service regulation to an incentive based regulatory
framework. Ulmer stated that if the Telecommunications Division provided the
results of the audit in an advisory capacity, the process would frustrate the
purpose of the audit to protect the public interest by removing the results
from a public forum. Ulmer stated that it is the Division best situated to
conduct the audit because of the complexity of Pacific Bell?s operations and
the competitive framework in which it operates.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1999
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
in support of ORA's motion for an order denying PacBell's petition for
modification of D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
for an order denying Pacific Bell's petition for modification of
D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED: On August 4, 1999, Terry Mowrey, Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA) Senior Manager, sent written materials (attached to the notice)
to Cmmr. Bilas. Identical materials were also sent to Cmmr. Duque, Cmmr.
Neeper, Cmmr. Hyatt, and Cmmr. Wood, and all of the Commissioner's advisors.
The materials states ORA's position that it has complied with each of the
Commission's directives in D96-05-036 and the Executive Director's additional
directives concerning the preparation of an audit plan and the selection of an
auditor for Pacific Bell (Pacific) New Regulatory Framework audit. ORA also
responds to Pacific's cencerns about ORA's handling of the audits as follows:
Overland is independent of Pacific. Overland's audit team is predominantly
CPAS, Oveland will adhere to GAAS and NARUC consultant standards, the majority
of Overland hours are budgeted to fulfill the Commission's requirements and
GAAS, the audit scope and objectives are consistent with the Executive
Director's and the Commission's directives, and the audit cost is reasonable.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: On August 3, 1999, Terry Mowrey, Office of Ratepayer Advocates
(ORA) Senior Manager, met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Also present
were: Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; Thomas Lew, Project Manager,
and Janice Grau, attorney, for ORA. Written materials (attached to the notice)
were used. ORA stated that the Pacific Bell (Pacific) new regulatory framework
audit was overdue and must start promptly in order to meet the deadline
established by the Commission, that ORA is the appropriate division to conduct
the audit, that the audit conforms with the Commission directives in D96-05-036
and with additional directives of the Executive Director, that both ORA and its
consultant intend that the audit be conducted in a professional manner, and
that a thorough and aggressive audit is necessary for the Commission to ensure
that Pacific is complying with Commission rules and regulations.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On August 2, 1999, Bill Blase, Vice-President-Regulatory, Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Also present were: Tim
Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; and Dan McCarthy, Senior Counsel, Pacific
Telesis Group. Blase expressed serious concerns with the audit that the Office
of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) and Overland Consulting propose to conduct. Blase
noted examples within the proposal, which demonstrated that the audit goes well
beyond the guidelines provided in D96-05-036 and Section 314.5. Blase also
stated PacBell's belief that ORA and its selected contractors could not perform
an objective Section 314.5 audit since ORA and its contractors have a conflict
of interest in that they have taken position adverse to PacBell. Blase asked
the Commission to reevaluate the public interest benefit of conducting any
audit of PacBell at this time. Blase suggested that if the Commission should
find that an audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be
transferred to the Telecommunications Division, the contract with Overland
Consulting should be cancelled and the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On July 27, 1999, Janice Grau, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates'
(ORA) attorney, met with Cmmr. Bilas in San Francisco. Also present were:
Dorothy Duda and Lester Wong, advisors to Cmmr. Bilas; and Terry Mowrey, Branch
Chief, and Thomas Lew, Project Manager, for ORA. Written materials (attached to
the notice) were used. Referring to the Pacific Bell new regulatory framework
audit, ORA representatives stated that it was overdue and must start promptly;
that ORA is the appropriate division to conduct the audit, that the audit
conforms with D96-05-036 and directives of the Executive Director, and that a
thorough and aggressive audit is necessary to ensure that Pacific Bell is
complying with Commission rules and regulations.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
On July 28, and July 29, 1999, Janice Grau, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates'
(ORA) attorney, met with Cmmr. Neeper and Cmmr. Wood, respectively, in two
separate meetings in San Francisco. Also present were: at the meeting with
Cmmr. Neeper - Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper; and with Cmmr. Wood -
Normal Low, advisor to Cmmr. Wood. In both meetings also participated Terry
Mowrey, Branch Chief, and Thomas Lew, Project Manager, for ORA. Written
materials (attached to the notice) were used. Referring to the Pacific Bell
new regulatory framework audit, ORA representatives stated that it was overdue
and must start promptly; that ORA is the appropriate division to conduct the
audit, that the audit conforms with D96-05-036 and directives of the Executive
Director, and that a thorough and aggressive audit is necessary to ensure that
Pacific Bell is complying with Commission rules and regulations.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 22, 1999, Bill Blase, Vice President Regulatory, Pacific Bell (Pacific)
sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Duque. An identical letter was
sent to Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque. The letter made the following
points: embarking on a costly and time consuming Section 314.5 audit of
Pacific does not appear to serve the pulic interest; Pacific's books and
records are already audited by a major independent accounting firm annually;
Pacific's achieved rates of return fell short of the sharing benchmark by over
$1.4 Billion over the years 1996-1998; though the Section 314.5 statute applies
to all telephone companies, the intent of the statute appears to be directed at
those utilities which are "rate of return" regulated, and the Commission has
exempted most telephone companies from the requirement, including our
competitors; customers and competitors are protected against cross-subsidies by
price regulation and Commission approved cost studies. The letter asked the
Commission to reevaluate the public interest benefit of conducting an audit of
Pacific at this time, given the changed circumstances since the Commission
originally ordered the audit. The letter added that if the Commission should
find that an audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be
transferred to the Telecommunications Division, and the audit should focus on
the literal wording of the 314.5 statute, "an inspection and audit of the books
and records".
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 26, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 21, 1999, Dennis Evans, Executive Director-Regulatory of Pacific Bell
(Pacific), sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Bob Lane, interim advisor
to Cmmr. Hyatt. Callaway's letter indicated that Pacific has serious concerns
with the audit the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) and Overland Consulting
(Overland) proposed to conduct. The letter noted that very few telephone
utilities are subject to such an audit since the Commission has exempted most
providers from the requirement. The letter stated that the scope of the audit
as requested by ORA, and as proposed by the selected bidder, goes well beyond
the guidelines provided by the Commission. The letter also stated Pacific's
belief that ORA and it's selected contractors can not perform an objective
Section 314.5 audit since ORA and the selected contractors have repeatedly
taken positions adverse to Pacific. Callaway's letter asked the Commission to
reevaluate the public interest benefit of conducting any audit of Pacific at
this time. The letter stated that if the Commission should find that an audit
should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be transferred to the
Telecommunications Division, the contract with Overland should be cancelled and
the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 19, 1999, Jim Callaway, President, Pacific Telesis Group (Pacific), met
with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were: Norman Low, interim
advisor to Cmmr. Wood; Bill Blase, Vice President Regulatory, Pacific Bell
(PacBell) and Dan McCarthy, Senior Counsel of Pacific. Blase expressed concern
with the Section 314.5 audit that the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA)
propose to conduct. McCarthy noted examples within the Proposal to Perform a
Regulatory Audit of Pacific Bell prepared by the selected bidder, Overland
Consulting (Overland), which demonstrated that the planned audit goes well
beyond the guidelines provided by D96-05-036 and the Section 314.5 statute.
McCarthy stated Pacific's belief that ORA and the selected contractor have a
conflict of interest in that they have taken positions adverse to PacBell.
Blase asked the Commission to reevaluate the benefit of conducting any audit of
PacBell at this time. Blase added that should the Commission find that an
audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be transferred
to the Telecommunications Division, and the contract with Overland should be
cancelled.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 20, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 15, 1999, Bill Blase, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Neeper in San Francisco. Also present was Dan
McCarthy, Senior Counsel, Pacific Telesis Group. Blase expressed serious
concerns with the audit that the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) and
Overland Consulting (Overland) propose to conduct. McCarthy noted that the
audit goes well beyond the guidelines provided in D96-05-036 and the Section
314.5 statute. McCarthy also stated PacBell's belief that ORA and its
contractors could not perform an objective audit since ORA and the contractors
clearly have a conflict of interest in that they have taken positions adverse
to PacBell. Blase asked that the Commission reevaluate the public interest
benefit of conducting any audit of PacBell at this time. Blase explained that
if the Commission should find that an audit should be performed, responsibility
for the audit should be transferred to the Telecommunications Division, the
contract with Overland should be cancelled and the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 14, 1999, Bill Blase, Vice President Regulatory, Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Bilas in San Francisco. Also present were: Dorothy
Duda and Lester Wong advisors to Cmmr. Bilas; and Dan McCarthy, Senior Counsel,
Pacific Telesis Group. Written material (attached to the notice) was used.
Blase expressed serious concerns with the audit that the Office of Rate
Advocates (ORA) and Overland Consulting (Overland) propose to conduct. McCarthy
noted examples, which demonstrated that the planned audit goes well beyond the
guidelines provided by D96-05-036 and the Section 314.5 statute. Blase stated
PacBell's belief that ORA and its selected contractors could not perform an
objective audit since ORA and the contractors have a conflict of interest.
Blase asked the Commission to reevaluate the public interest benefit of
conducting any audits of PacBell at this time and stated that if the Commission
should find that an audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit
should be transferred to the Telecommunications Division, the contract with
Overland cancelled and the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On July 13, 1999, Jim Callaway, President, Pacific Telesis Group,
sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Bilas. An identical letter was
also sent to Cmmrs. Duque, Hyatt, Neeper and Wood. The letter demonstrates the
fundamental flaws and unfairness of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates' planned
Section 314.5 audit of Pacific Bell. The letter asks the Commission to
re-evaluate the public interest benefit of conducting any audit of Pacific Bell
at this time. The letter states that if the Commission should find that an
audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be transferred
to the Telecommunications Division, the contract with Overland Consulting
should be cancelled and the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's Petition for Modification of D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
COMMR/DUQUE/PUC
|
|
Description:
denies PacBell's emergency motion to suspend the awarding of an auditing
contract pursuant to a request for proposal issued by ORA; as set forth
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's emergency motion to suspend the awarding of an auditing contract
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Emergency; to suspend the awarding of an auditing contract pursuant to a
request for proposal issued by the ORA on 3/29/99
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.C
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's application for rehearing
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's appl. for rehear. of D99-04-071
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
denies Pacific Bell's filing of 4/21/99 to extend the date for implementing
dialing parity; dismisses filing as moot
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to withdraw its Petition for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D99-04-071
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On April 20, 1999, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates ("ORA") told
Commissioner Neeper's advisor that ORA concurred with Administrative Law Judge
Walker's draft decision ("DD"). Counsel Janice Grau told Fassil Fenikile ORA
supported the DD which requires Pacific Bell to comply with the Federal
Communications Commission's dialing parity order and with D.97-04-083.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS/CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
on PacBell's Dialing Parity Plan for Implementing IntraLATA Presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Dialing Parity Plan for implementing intralata presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On April 16, 1999 AT&T Communications of California, Inc. ("AT&T") initiated an
ex parte meeting with Commissioner Duque. Present for AT&T were Rick
Witherington and Randy Deutsch, and they were accompanied by Richard Purkey
from Sprint and Richard Severy from MCI WorldCom. The attendees stated the
Commission should vote out ALJ Walker's proposed decision requiring Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on May 7, 1999 pursuant to the
requirements of the FCC. Advisor Timothy Sullivan was also in attendance.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On April 14, 1999 AT&T Communications of California, Inc. ("AT&T") initiated an
ex parte meeting with Commission President Bilas. Present for AT&T were Rick
Witherington and Randy Deutsch, and they were accompanied by Richard Purkey
from Sprint and Richard Severy from MCI WorldCom. The attendees stated the
Commission should vote out ALJ Walker's proposed decision requiring Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on May 7, 1999 pursuant to the
requirements of the FCC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
in support of the Petition for Modification of D94-09-065 by Pacific Bell
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
in opposition to PacBell's Petition for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of Pacific Bell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's Petition to Modifiy D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Petition of PacBell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of Pacific Bell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
to Petition of Pacific Bell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of Pacific Bell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On April 8, 1999 AT&T Communications of California, Inc. ("AT&T")
initiated an ex parte meeting with Commissioner Neeper. Present for AT&T were
Rick Witherington and Randy Deutsch, and they were accompanied by Richard
Purkey from Sprint and Richard Severy from MCI WorldCom. The attendees stated
the Commission should vote out ALJ Walker's proposed decision requiring Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on May 7, 1999 pursuant to the
requirements of the FCC.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS/CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATION COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply; in response to the DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the DD on dialing parity
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on DD of ALJ Walker
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on the DD of ALJ Walker on dialing parity
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
CMMR/NEEPER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments to the attached DD of ALJ Walker are due by 4/6/99; reply - 4/11/99
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments are due by 4/6/99; reply - 4/11/99; this decision is attached to the
March 25, 1999 ruling shortening time for comments
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On March 3, 1999 AT&T Communications of California, Inc. ("AT&T") initiated
three (3) ex parte meetings with PUC officials and engaged in oral and written
ex parte communications in each meeting, covering the same subject matter each
time. The PUC officials were, in order: (a) Commission President Bilas and
advisor Lester Wong, (b) Tim Sullivan, advisor to Commissioner Duque, and ( c )
Commissioner Neeper and advisor Fassil Fenikile. The AT&T contingent for the
first meeting included Rick Witherington, and accompanying him were Richard
Purkey of Sprint and Richard Severy of MCI. For the second and third
meetings, Bob Munoz was the MCI representative instead of Mr. Severy. The
attendees encouraged the PUC officials to issue an order requiring Pacific Bell
to implement 1+ presubscription on an expedited basis as this would, it was
stated, benefit consumers and small businesses. Five (5) briefing sheets were
provided the recipients in the first two meetings (but none in the meeting with
Commissioner Neeper). The sheets were headlined "Public Interest," "IntraLATA
1+ Presubscription," "8th Circuit is Done," "No Justification for Further
Delays," "Pacific Bell Contradicts Its Own Legal Position," and "Immediate
Action Required." The writings were attached to the filer's Notice of Ex
Parte Communications.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on dialing parity issues; pursuant to Assigned Commr.'s ruling of 2/3/99
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
pursuant to the 2/3/99 Assigned Commr.'s ruling
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L.P.
|
|
Description:
pursuant to Assigned Commr.'s ruling of 2/3/99
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 8, 1999, four (4) Pacfic Bell ("PacBell") representatives met with
and engaged in oral ex parte communications at CPUC with Commission President
Bilas and advisor Lester Wong. The PacBell representatives were Ed Mueller,
President and CEO of PacBell, and Jim Callaway, Ric Zamore, Bill Blase, and Jim
Young. Notwithstanding the recent Supreme Court decision in AT&T v Iowa
Utilities Board, Mr. Young stated there is no mandate to change PUC's earlier
decision that intraLATA pre-subscription should coincide with PacBell's entry
into long distance. He said no change is required because: (a) Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC") rules may be subject to further review by the
Eighth Circuit, (b) Section 271 authorizes states to address timing, and thus
FCC rules would be guidelines, ( c ) Section 251(d)(3) of the Act preserves
state access rules and decisions not inconsistent with the Act, (d)
simultaneous entry was the basis for the parties' settlement and Commission
decision, and hence AT&T and others cannot now unilaterally change that.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
pursuant to the February 3, 1999 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1999
|
Filed By:
CMMR/NEEPER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Directs PacBell to file comments on 2/8/99, as set forth; invites parties to
file briefs on 2/19/99, as set forth; withdraws the January 7, 1999 draft
decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 2, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 29, 1999, three (3) Pacfic Bell ("PacBell") representatives met with
and engaged in oral ex parte communications at CPUC with Commissioner Neeper
and his advisor, Fassil Fenikile. The PacBell representatives were Bill Blase,
Jim Young, and David Discher. PacBell initiated the contact. Notwithstanding
the recent Supreme Court decision in AT&T v Iowa Utilities Board, Mr. Young
stated there are four (4) reasons why the Commission need not change its
existing decision requiring simultaneous inter LATA and intraLATA entry. The
four (4) reasons stated were (a) the timing issue may be subject to further
consideration by the Eighth Circuit, (b) Section 271 confers on states the
right to address timing, ( c ) preemption applies only to state rules
inconsistent with the Act, and (d) simultaneous entry was the basis for the
parties' settlement and cannot now be changed by some of those same parties.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 1, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
reply; on DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPATION
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
January 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
DKT/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
the 12/17/98 Sprint Ex Parte Notice to include proceeding number, I87-11-033,
which was left out of the notice when it appeared in the 1/12/99 daily calendar
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
January 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments may be filed by 1/27/99; reply - 5 ds after comments are filed
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 18, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
pursuant to ALJ's ruling of 12/2/98
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
On December 14 and 15, 1998, Sprint Communications Co. L.P. ("Sprint")
conducted three (3) ex parte sessions with PUC officials, conducting the same
oral and written communications in each session. On 12/14/98 Sprint's Richard
A. Purkey met with Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Commissioner Duque, and then
with Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Commissioner Neeper. On 12/15/98, the Sprint
representative met with Lester Wong, advisor to Commission President Bilas. In
regard to "271" issues then scheduled to be discussed at the Commission's
12/17/98 meeting, Mr. Purkey stated Pacific will not be in compliance if
intraLATA equal access is not implemented on 2/8/99. He said the Commission's
procedure to allow further showing by parties after 2/8/99 is appropriate and
does not prejudge issues still under consideration in I87-11-033. Mr. Purkey
stated the Commission should explicitly require Pacific adopt procedures that
would ensure its employees not collect or disseminate the categories of carrier
information identified during the collaboratives by the Joint Presenters for
Pacific's own or its affiliate's marketing purposes. Mr. Purkey concluded by
saying the 15 day response time provided in the draft order to respond to
Pacific's .. etc..One was a one (1) page handout entitled "Suggested
Modifications to the Draft Order," and the second was a packet labeled
"confidential." The confidential packet was identified as selected portions of
"Sprint's Response to the 2/20/98 Joint Managing Commissioner's and
Administrative Law Judge's Ruling on Pacific Bell's Compliance with Section 271
of the Act." Sprint reports that included among the confidential material was
"Exhibit 17" to Sprint's response ...the ALJs ruling of 3/23/98 authorizes the
confidential status, and that Sprints "Motion ... Confidential information
under seal" filed 3/31/98 effects that status. Both the unsealed and sealed
written communications were filed by Sprint with its "Notice of Ex Parte
Communications.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
regarding PacBell's obligation to priovide intraLATA toll dialing parity by
2/8/99
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
pursuant to the December 2, 1998 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
CMMR/NEEPER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Joint; briefs are due on 12/15/98
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 16, 1998, Pacific Bell ("PacBell) representatives initiated an ex
parte meeting at CPUC with Commissioner Duque and his advisor, Tim Sullivan.
Oral communications were conveyed, and a written summary sheet was also
provided the recipients. The PacBell representatives were Jim Callaway,
President Pacific Telesis, and Bill Blase, David Discher, and Cynthia Marshall.
The following points were conveyed: Intralata presubscription ("ILP") should
not be implemented prior to long distance entry for PacBell's affiliate,
otherwise irreparable harm to the company would result; consumers will not
receive the best possible offers if PacBell is not able to joint market long
distance, local toll, and local exchange service at the start of ILP. The
first sentence of the one-page handout read: "Congress intended that ILP and
PBCOM entry occur simultaneously."
|
|
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Statement; pursuant to ALJ's 10/23/98 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
Statement; pursuant to ALJ's 10/23/98 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
Joint statement; pursuant to ALJ's 10/23/98 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to the motion of AT&T, et al
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1998
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Two (2) Ex parte Communications filed by AT&T Communications of CA, originally
filed on 10/27/98 and appeared on the 10/30/98 Daily Calendar in order to
include all proceeding numbers listed on the notice
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1998
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Ex parte Communication filed by AT&T Communications of CA, originally filed on
10/29/98 and appeared on the 11/2/98 Daily Calendar in order to include all
proceeding numbers listed on the notice
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On October 28, 1998, Rick Witherington, Vice President of Government Affairs
for AT&T Communications of California, Inc., met with Cmmr. Bilas in San
Francisco. Also present were: Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; Richard
Severy, Director of Public Policy for MCI; and Katherine Stokes Morehouse,
President of the California Association of Competitive Telecommunications
Companies. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Severy, speaking
on behalf of the long distance carriers, explained the basis for their recent
filing requesting that the intraLATA toll market be opened to 1+
presubscription. Severy noted that in light of changed circumstances since
D97-04-083, particularly Pacific Bell's failure to meet the requirements of the
271 checklist in 1997, the Commission should modify D97-04-083 to order Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on or before February 8, 1999 as
required by federal law.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On October 29, 1998, Rick Witherington, Vice President of Government Affairs
for AT&T Communications of California, Inc., met with Cmmr. Duque in San
Francisco. Also present were: Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; Richard
Severy, Director of Public Policy for MCI; and Katherine Stokes Morehouse,
President of the California Association of Competitive Telecommunications
Companies. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Severy, speaking
on behalf of the long distance carriers, explained the basis for their recent
filing requesting that the intraLATA toll market be opened to 1+
presubscription. Severy noted that in light of changed circumstances since
D97-04-083, particularly Pacific Bell's failure to meet the requirements of the
271 checklist in 1997, the Commission should modify D97-04-083 to order Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on or before February 8, 1999 as
required by federal law.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On October 23, 1998, representatives of AT&T Communications of California, Inc.
("AT&T") met for one hour in Mendocino with Commission President Bilas at the
company's initiation. The representatives were AT&T Chairman C. Michael
Armstrong, accompanied by AT&T's David Condit, and Rick Witherington. Mr.
Armstrong expressed his company's recommendations in the Final Staff Report
("FSR") regarding Pacific Bell's impementation of the Section 271 "competitive
checklist." He discussed the company's unsuccessful efforts in providing local
service through resale of incumbent LEC services around the country. Mr.
Armstrong emphasized that in order to avoid a similar failed effort through use
of unbundled network elements, the Commission should ensure proper
implementation of the competitive checklist prior to approval of any
application for interLATA authority by SBC/Pacific Bell (PacBell). He said
AT&T desires the commission to comply with the current schedule and vote on the
FSR before the end of the year. Mr. Armstrong concluded by asking PUC to
proceed as quickly as possible on the iner-exchange carriers' request to
implement intraLATA pre-subscription before 2/8/99. Consumers are the ultimate
beneficiaries, he said, of opening this market by eliminating the requirement
to dial seven (7) extra digits when using a carrier other than PacBell.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On October 26, 1998, representatives of AT&T Communications of California, Inc.
("AT&T") met in consecutive sessions with PUC officials and conducted oral and
written ex parte communications. The two (2) sessions were with,
respectively, Commissioner Knight and his advisors, Dorothy Duda and Robert
Lane, and Commissioner Neeper and his advisor, Fassil Fenikile. The AT&T
contingent was slightly different for each session. In the first session, Rick
Witherington, David Condit, and Richard Severy attended. Mr. Severy was
identified as the "MCI Director of Public Policy." For the second session,
Katherine Stokes Morehouse, President of the California Assoc. of Competitive
Telecommunications Companies ("CALTEL") attended in place of Mr. Condit. Mr.
Severy represented himself to be speaking on behalf of the long distance
carriers. He stated the basis for AT&T's recent filing requesting the
intraLATA toll market in California be opened to "1+" pre-subscription. He
added there were changed circumstances since the issuance of D97-04-083,
particularly Pacific Bells ("PacBell") failure to meet the requirements of the
"271" checklist in 1997 as anticipated in the decision. Therefore, he stated,
the Commission should modify D97-04-083 to order PacBell to implement intraLATA
pre-subscription before February 8, 1999 as required by federal law.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
reschedules PHC from 11/20/98 to 11/23/98
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP
|
|
Description:
for leave to file reply to PacBell's and ORA's petition to modify D97-04-083;
reply attached
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 23, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
sets PHC on 11/20/98
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to AT&T, et al.'s petition to modify D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to AT&T's, Caltel's, MCI's and Sprint's petition to modify D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
September 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Recalendar AT&T's petition for modification of D97-04-083 to include petition
for modification wording and C87-07-024 caption; which were cut off on the
9/16/98 daily calendar
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 11, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DEULLOA/PUC
|
|
Description:
Directs Docket Office to file AT&T, CALTEL, MCI, and Sprint's motion for an
order requiring PacBell to implement intraLATA presubscription as petition for
modification of D97-04-083; AT&T to serve Petition in I87-11-033; responses to
Petition due 30 days after Petitioners properly serve parties in I87-11-033
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
of D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 6, 1998
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to accept late-filed response; response attached
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1998
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
to ALJ 2/23/98 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
pursuant to 2/23/98 ruling of ALJ Reed
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1998
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
in response to the ALJ ruling of 2/23/98 soliciting comments on GTE's motion to
delay its 1998 triennial NRF review in view of Pacific Bell's NRF application
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments on 1998 Triennial Review of the new regulatory framework are due 3/3/98
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 1998
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to response of TURN
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to the responses of TURN, ORA, AT&T/MCI/Nextlink/California Cable Television
Association to the motion of GTE California Incorporated to delay the 1998
triennial review of the new regulatory framework until 1999
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIOM
NEXTLINK CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
to the motion of GTE California Incorporated to delay the 1998 triennial review
of the new regulatory framework until 1999
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 1998
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to the motion of GTE California to defer the 1998 review of the new regulatory
framework
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the December 19, 1997 motion of GTE California Incorporated (GTEC) to delay
its portion of the 1998 triennial review of the new regulatory framework (NRF)
until 1999
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to delay the 1998 Triennial Review *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 21, 1997, Michael Sasser, attorney for Pacific Bell (PacBell), sent
a letter (attached to notice) to Cmmrs. Conlon, Neeper, Knight, Duque, and
Bilas in San Francisco. A copy was also sent to Thomas MacBride, attorney for
CALTEL. Sasser stated that the Commission correctly denied CALTELs Petition
for Modification of the IRD decision, and its application for rehearing should
be denied as well. Sasser stated that CALTEL is wrong in arguing that the
Commissions discussion of revenue neutrality in D97-07-024 does not apply to
the issue of revenue neutrality raised by CALTEL in its Petition for
Modification and Application for Rehearing. Sasser stated that in denying
CALTELs Petition to Modify the IRD decision, the Commission correctly rejected
CALTELs argument that PacBells use of the surcharge/surcredit mechanism was
inconsistent with the IRD decision. Sasser stated that the Commission found
the effect of which CALTEL complains was not unanticipated and that if the
Commission had intended a change in the bill date method of applying surcharges
and surcredits it would have addressed that issue in the IRD decision which it
did not.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
CA ASSN OF COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATION
|
|
Description:
On November 13, 1997, Thomas MacBride, counsel for the California Association
of Competitive Telecommunications Carriers (CALTEL) sent a letter (attached to
notice) to Cmmrs. Conlon, Duque, Bilas, Neeper, and Knight. A copy of the
letter was also sent to: Izetta Jackson, counsel for the Commission; and
Michael Sasser, for Pacific Bell. MacBride stated that CALTEL's presently
pending application for rehearing of D96-03-021 raised issues different than
that raised by Pacific Bell (PacBell) in its application for rehearing of
D97-02-049...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On August 27, 1997, Robert Kargoll, Regulatory Director for AT&T Communications
of California, Inc. (AT&T), met with Cmmr. Bilas in San Francisco. Also
present were: Lester Wong, advisor for Cmmr. Bilas; Rick Witherington,
Government Affairs Vice President for AT&T; and William Harrelson, Senior
Attorney for MCI. Kargoll and Harrelson requested that Cmmr. Bilas seriously
consider the points outlined in the "Joint Petition to Modify D9704083,"
particularly with respect to how Pacific Bell markets intraLATA toll service
once intraLATA presubscription is implemented.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Description:
for acceptance of late-filed response; response attached
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to the joint petition of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint to modify D9704093
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Joint Petition to modify D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
to ALJ ruling of 6/26/97
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF COMPETITIVE
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
of D97-06-104
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
invites parties to file, by 7/18/97, comments on whether to continue any of
these dockets, other than I87-11-033
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER AXS OF CALIFORNIA, LP
TIME WARNER CONNECT
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 1997
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS TELECOM. COMPANY/GOLDEN STATE
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO./TUOLUMNE
|
|
Description:
to ORA's response to motion for temporary suspension of toll dialing parity
requirements
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
n/a
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
Reply; to proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1997
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Concerning the proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
n/a
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments due 6/12/97; reply comments due 6/17/97
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 22, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Citizens Telecommunications Company of Tuolumne and of Citizens
Telecommunications Company of the Golden State's petition for temporary
suspension of toll dialing parity requirements
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments due 6/2/97; Reply Comments due 6/9/97
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1997
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS TELECOM. CO./GOLDEN STATE
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO./TUOLUMNE
|
|
Description:
of the Golden State for temporary suspension of toll dialing parity requirements
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CARD SERVICES INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules of CLCs, pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules; pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules, pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESELLERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules for CLCs
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
COX CALIFORNIA TELCOM, INC.
|
|
Description:
regarding proposed intraLATA rules for CLCs
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed rules for CLCs for implementation of intraLATA presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER AXS OF CALIFORNIA, LP
TIME WARNER CONNECT
|
|
Description:
pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
in response to a 4/14/97 ruling requesting comments on proposed intraLATA rules
for CLCs
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules for CLCs
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on proposed rules for intraLATA presubscription by CLC, pursuant to 4/14/97
ruling
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1997
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for an award of compensation
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D97-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to application for rehearing of D97-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/16/97, Lynn Mowery, PacBell, met with Dorothy Duda, adv. to Cmmr. Knight,
in SF. Also present were: Ed Kolto-Wininger, Pacific Telesis, and Ronnie
Thierman, PacBell. Written material (attached) was used. Thierman asked the
Commission to modify the proposed decision to clarify that PacBell is allowed
to tell customers that it offers intraLATA toll service. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/16/97, Lynn Mowevery, PacBell, met with Cmmr. Conlon in SF. Also present
were: Jose Jimenez, adv. to Cmmr. Conlon; and David Dorman, and John Gueldner,
PacBell. Written material (attached) was used. Dorman asked the Commission to
modify the proposed decision to clarify that PacBell is allowed to tell
customers that it offers intraLATA toll service. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/16/97, Lynn Mowery, PacBell, met with Lester Wong, adv. to Cmmr. Bilas, in
SF. Also present were: Ed Kolto-Wininger, Pacific Telesis, and Ronnie
Thierman, PacBell. Written material (attached) was used. Thierman asked the
Commission to modify the proposed decision to clarify that PacBell is allowed
to tell customers that it offers intraLATA toll service. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 4/15/97, Natalie Billingsley of ORA participated in two separate meetings:
with Cmmr. Duque and with Cmmr. Conlon in SF. Also present at the first
meeting were: Timothy Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque; Helen Mickiewicz, staff
counsel for ORA; and other parties listed on the attachment to the notice. In
the meeting with Cmmr. Conlon also participated: Jose Jimenez, adv. to Cmmr.
Conlon; and Pat van Midde, and Rick Witherington, AT&T.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 1997, Lynn Mowery, Director of Regulatory Relations for Pacific
Bell (PacBell), met with Fassile Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper, in San
Francisco. Also present were: Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; and
John Gueldner, Vice President Regulatory, and Ronnie Thierman, Executive
Director, of PacBell
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 1997, Robert Kargoll, Regulatory Advocate for AT&T Communications
of California, Inc. (AT&T), met with Cmmr. Conlon in San Francisco. Also
present were: Jose Jimenez, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon; Patricia vanMiddle, State
Regulatory District Manager of AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On April 17, 1997, Rick Witherington, Chief Regulatory Advocate for AT&T
Communications of California, Inc. (AT&T), met with Cmmr. Bilas in San
Francisco. Also present were: Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; and
Patricia vanMiddle, State Regulatory District Manager of AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 4/10/97, Helen Mickiewicz, Commission's ORA, met on separate occasions with
Fassil Fenikile, advisor for Cmmr Neeper, in SF. Mickiewicz stated that ORA
had read PacBell's ex parte notices, and did not agree that the
competitively-neutral business office practices set forth in the PD would
prohibit PacBell from affirmatively informing its customers that it provides
intraLATA toll service..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's application for rehearing of D97-02-049
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
directs CLCs and other parties to file comments on the proposed rules for
implementing intraLATA presubscription for CLCs; comments are due by 5/4/97
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's application for rehearing of D97-02-049
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
of D97-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Knight in San Francisco. Also present were: Dorothy
Duda, advisor to Cmmr. Knight, and John Polumbo, President of Consumer Market
Group for PacBell
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Neeper, in San Francisco. Also present were: Fassil
Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper; David Dorman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, PacBell; and Richard Odgers, Executive Vice President - General
Counsel, Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Also present were: Tim
Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; David Dorman, President and Chief Executive
Officer for PacBell; and Richard Odgers, Executive Vice President - General
Counsel, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Bilas in San Francisco. Also present were: David
Dorman, President and Chief Executive Officer for PacBell; and Richard Odgers,
Executive Vice President - General Counsel, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Jose Jimenez, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon, in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 4, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice President, Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell) met with Timothy Sullivan, advisor for Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco.
David Discher, Senior Counsel for Pacific Telesis Group, was also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 4, 1997, David Discher, Senior Counsel for Pacific Telesis Group, sent
a letter to Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 4, 1997, Mary Vanderpan, Vice President, Regulatory Regulations for
Pacific Bell (PacBell) met with Dorothy Duda, advisor for Cmmr. Knight, in San
Francisco. David Discher, Senior Counsel for Pacific Telesis Group, and Ronnie
Thierman, Executive Director, Regulatory Proceedings for PacBell, were also
present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/2/97, Mary Vanderpan, PacBell, met with Fassil Fenikile, adv. to Cmmr.
Neeper, in SF. Also present were: David Discher, Pacific Telesis Legal Group;
and Ronnie Thierman, PacBell. Vanderpan explained that PacBell is concerned
with the ORA claims for script review and the fact that the Commission did not
order cost recovery for notices to customers with existing interLATA PIC
freezes ..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D97-02-049
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision concerning intraLATA toll dialing parity
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
Opening; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICNA G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 3/5/97, Mark Savage, American G.I. Forum and Latino Issues Forum, forwarded
to Cmmrs. Conlon, Knight, Duque, Neeper, and Bilas a letter (attached). The
letter addressed the proposed decision and alternate decision, and stated that
they are contrary to D95-08-051, as well as the statute and the record. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
Opening; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE COMPANY
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On 3/4/97, Walter Mosley, AT&T, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Fassil Fenikile,
adv. for Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Fassil Fenikile, adv. to Cmmr. Neeper, was also
present. Written material (attached) was used.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On February 26, 1997, Mark Savage, counsel for the Intervenors, met with Bob
Lane, advisor for Cmmr. Knight, in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 2/18/97, Mark Savage, Counsel for Intervenors, spoke with Fessil Fenikile,
advisor for Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Savage stated that the questions raised about
Intervenors' request for compensation continue to have ready answers, many of
which have already been provided in the request, the supplemental report, and
in D95-08-051.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On February 13, 1997, Mark Savage, counsel for Intervenors, met with Cmmr.
Neeper in San Francisco. Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper, was also
present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On February 18, 1997, Mark Savage, counsel for Intervenors, spoke with Jose
Jimenez, advisor for Cmmr. Conlon in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 2/19/97, Mark Savage, for Intervenors, left a voice mail message for Bob
Lane, adv. for Cmmr. Knight in SF. Savage stated that the hours included in
the request for compensation were incurred between D93-09-076 and D94-09-065 to
produce the "settlement" and protest the "advice letter" cited in D94-09-065.
Savage stated that the ordering paraphaphs of D95-08-051 had already found that
Pacific Bell should pay for the hours incurred on the settlement.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 2/13/97, Mary Vanderpan, PacBell, met with Cmmr. Bilas, in SF. Also present
were Lester Wong, interim advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, and John Gueldner, PacBell.
A copy of pages (attached) from a 9/28/92 ex parte communication was used.
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due by 3/10/97
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 11, 1997, Lynn Mowery, Director Regulatory Relations at Pacific
Bell (PacBell), met with President Conlon in San Francisco. Also present were:
Jose Jimenez, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon; and John Gueldner, Vice President
Regulatory for PacBell
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 13, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 2/11/97, Alan Gardner, for CCTA, met with Cmmr. Conlon in SF. Jose Jimenez,
adv. for Cmmr. Conlon, was also present. Gardner stated that at this stage in
the proceeding the record was confusing and stale given the technological
developments which clearly made ISDN a Category II service. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/CAREW/PUC
|
|
Description:
Orders that proceeding I87-11-033 identified by PacBell as a candidate
proceeding for the SB experiment not be included in the SB 960 experiment at
this time
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 5, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Conlon in San
Francisco. A copy of the letter was also sent to Jose Jimenez, advisor for
Cmmr. Conlon
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 5, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Conlon in San Francisco. Jose Jimenez, advisor for
Cmmr. Conlon, was also present
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
PACIFIC BELL
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Joint; to adopt settlement agreement
|
|
|
Type:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of identification of candidate proceeding (petition for modification of
D89-10-031) for SB960 experiment
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
|
|
|
Description:
On January 30, 1997, Alan J. Gardner, Regulatory and Legal Affairs Vice
President for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with
Cmmr. Knight in San Francisco. Bob Lane and Dorothy Duda, advisors for Cmmr.
Knight, and Cynthia Walker, Regulatory Manager for CCTA, were also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On January 30, 1997, Alan J. Gardner, Regulatory and Legal Affairs Vice
President for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Tim
Sullivan, advisor for Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Cynthia Walker, Regulatory
Manager for CCTA, was also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 1/29/97, Alan J. Gardner, for the CCTA, met with Bob Lane, adv. for Cmmr.
Knight in SF. Spencer R. Kaitz, of CCTA, was also present. Gardner stated
that CCTA believes that the record is confusing and stale given the
technological developments since the August hearing which clearly made ISDN a
Category II service with competition in California. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 1/30/97, Lynn Mowery, Pacific Bell, met with Cmmr. Bilas in SF. Also
present were: Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; John Gueldner, PacBell, and
Dick Odgers, PacBell. Gueldner stated that the IRD decision was intended to be
revenue neutral.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 1/30/97, Alan J. Gardner, CCTA, met with Cmmr. Knight in SF. Bob Lane and
Dorothy Duda, advisors for Cmmr. Knight, and Cynthia Walker, CCTA, were also
present. Gardner and Walker stated that CCTA believes that the record is
confusing and stale given the technological developments since the August
hearing which clearly made ISDN a Category II service with competition in
California.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 1/22/97, Dick Odgers, Executive V.P. - General Counsel and External Affairs
for Pacific Bell, had a telephone conversation with Cmmr. Duque. Also
participating in the conversation were: Tim Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque; and
John Gueldner, V.P. Regulatory of Pacific. Odgers urged the Commission to
approve the proposed alternate decision of Cmmr. Neeper.
|
|
|
Type:
IDENTIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Identification of candidate proceeding (petition for modification of
D89-10-031) for SB960 experiment
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1997
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
On January 22, 1997, Thomas Long, Senior Telecommunications Attorney for The
Utility Reform Network (TURN), wrote a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr.
Conlon. Copies of the letter were also delivered to Cmmrs. Knight, Duque,
Neeper and Bilas; and to the Cmmrs.' advisors Fassil Fenikile, Jose Jimenez,
Robert Lane, Dorothy Duda, Timothy Sullivan, and Lester Wong
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN.
|
|
Description:
On 1/21/97, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal Affairs of
CCTA, met with Jose Jimenez, Advisor to Cmmr. Conlon, in SF. Gardner stated
that the record is confusing and stale given the technological developments
since the August hearing which clearly made ISDN a category II service.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN.
|
|
Description:
On 1/21/97, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal Affairs of
CCTA, met with Lester Wong, Advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, in SF. Gardner stated that
the record is confusing and stale given the technological developments since
the August hearing which clearly made ISDN a category II service.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 1/15/97, Mark Savage, councel for Latino Issues Forum and the American GI
Forum (Intervenors), wrote and delivered a letter (attached) to Fassil
Fenikile, adv. to Cmmr. Neeper, in SF. The letter stated that both the draft
decision on Intervenors' request for compensation and D95-08-051 had compared
Intervenors' hours with TURN's hours. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 15, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
Augmentation Required. On 1/13/97, Mark Savage, counsel for the Latino Issues
Forum and American G.I. Forum (Intervenors), met with Jose Jimenez, advisor for
Cmmr. Conlon, in SF. Also present were: Fassil Fenikile, advisor for Cmmr.
Neeper; Dorothy Duda, advisor for Cmmr. Knight; and Rob Feraru, the
Commission's Public Advisor. Savage distributed a letter dated 12/6/96
addressing the draft decision, and a copy of the "Intervenors' Supplemental
Report." Written material was used, but was not attached to the notice.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 2, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
semi-annual multilingual report - 7/1/96 - 12/31/96, in compliance with
D87-12-067
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On December 17, 1996, Lynn Mowery, Director for Regulatory Relations for
Pacific Bell (PacBell), met with Fassil Fenikile, advisor for Cmmr. Neeper in
San Francisco. Ed Kolto-Wininger, attorney for PacBell, and Ronnie Thierman,
Executive Director of Regulatory Proceeding for PacBell, were also present
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
CMMR/FESSLER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Discloses and makes available for public inspection the reports, findings,
requests for opinion of counsel, and the opinion of counsel
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On December 6, 1996, Mark Savage, counsel for Latino Issues Forum and the
American G. I. Forum, sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Conlon,
Fessler, Knight, Duque, and Neeper in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
GTE WEST COAST INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
Concurrent reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Reply; on issues relating to intraLATA presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; concerning intraLATA equal access issues
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On 12/4/96, Timothy McCallion, for GTE, met with Cmmr. Knight in SF. Also
present were: Dorothy Duda, adv. to Cmmr. Knight; and Carol Lam, for GTE.
McCallion stated that GTE would like to be heard on the joint petition filed by
PacBell and GTE in Sept. 1995,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
On 12/4/96, Timothy McCallion, for GTE, met with Lester Wong, adv. to Cmmr.
Conlon, in SF. McCallion stated that GTE would like to be heard on the joint
petition filed by PacBell and GTE in Sept. 1995,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On 12/4/96, Timothy McCallion, for GTE, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Also
present was Fassil Fenikile, adv. to Cmmr. Neeper. McCallion noted that GTE
felt that there may be an overlap between issues that would be considered in
the franchise impact proceeding,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
on the PD of ALJ Walker
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
on PD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On November 25, 1996, Thomas Long, Senior Telecommunications Attorney for
Toward Utility Rate Normalization, met with Cmmr. Knight in San Francisco.
Also present was Dorothy Duda, advisor to Cmmr. Knight
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; concerning intraLATA equal access issues
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
Concurrent opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; phase III intraLATA presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Opening; on issues relating to intraLATA presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the implementation of intraLATA toll dialing parity in California
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE COMPANY
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; on intraLATA equal access issues
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 15, 1996, John Gueldner, Vice President of Regulatory for Pacific
Bell (PacBell), met with Cmmr. Knight in San Francisco. Also present was David
Discher, Senior Counsel of Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due on 12/05/96
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
n 11/8/96, Thomas Long, for TURN, met with Cmmr. Conlon, in SF. Lester Wong,
adv. for Cmmr. Conlon, was also present. Long stated that the alternate
improperly used a summary judgement standard for deciding whether to reopen a
final decision. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/5/96, Thomas Long, TURN, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Fassil Fenikile,
adv. to Cmmr. Neeper, was also present. Long argued that the proper standard
for the alternate to decide whether to reopen a previous decision..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/5/96, Thomas Long, TURN, met Jose Jimenez, adv. to Cmmr. Fessler. Long
argued that the proper standard for the alternate to decide whether to reopen a
previous decision.., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/5/96, Thomas Long, TURN, met with Cmmr. Duque in SF. Tim Sullivan, adv.
to Cmmr. Duque, was also present. Long argued that the proper standard for the
alternate to decide whether to reopen a previous decision..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 7, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 11/4/96, Lynn Mowwery of PacBell, spoke with Jose Jimenez, adv. to Cmmr.
Fessler, in SF. Also present were: John Gueldner, for PacBel; and David P.
Discher, Pacific Telesis Legal Group. Gueldner stated that three aspsects of
the alternate needed modification or clarification,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 7, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 11/4/96, Lynn Mowwery of PacBell, met with Cmmr. Duque, in SF. Also present
were Tim Sullivan, adv. for Cmmr. Duque; John Gueldner, for PacBel; and David
P. Discher, Pacific Telesis Legal Group. Gueldner stated that three aspsects
of the alternate needed modification or clarification,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Thomas Long, TURN, wrote a letter (attached), delivered to Cmmrs.
Conlon, Fessler, Knight, Duque, and Neeper. The letter states that the
alternate order of Cmmrs. Conlon and Neeper used the wrong standard in deciding
whether to allow the Pet. for Mod. of PacBell and GTE to go to hearing...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 1, 1996, John Gueldner, Vice President of Regulatory for Pacific
Bell (PacBell), met with Cmmr. Neeper in San Francisco. Also present were:
Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper; Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon;
Mary Vanderpan, Regulatory Vice President of PacBell; and David Discher, Senior
Counsel of Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 1, 1996, John Gueldner, Vice President of Regulatory for Pacific
Bell (PacBell), spoke with Cmmr. Conlon. Also participating in the
conversation were: Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon; Mary Vanderpan,
Regulatory Vice President of PacBell
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Helen Mickiewicz, counsel for ORA, met with Cmmr. Duque, in SF.
Tim Sullivan, adv. for Cmmr. Duque, was also present. Mickiewicz urged Cmmr.
Duque not to support the alternate,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Alan Gardner, CCTA, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Gardner,
referring to the Cmmr. Neeper's alternate, stated that the summary judgment
standard is not appropriate,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Alan Gardner, CCTA, spoke to Lester Wong, adv. to Cmmr. Conlon.
Gardner, referring to the Cmmr. Neeper's alternate, stated that the summary
judgment standard is not appropriate.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Alan Gardner, CCTA, met with Tim Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque, in
SF. Gardner, referring to the Cmmr. Neeper's alternate, stated that the
summary judgment standard is not appropriate.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Alan Gardner, CCTA, met with Dorothy Duda, adv. to Cmr. Knight in
SF. Gardner, referring to the Cmmr. Neeper's alternate, stated that the
summary judgment standard is not appropriate.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Late filed. On 10/28/96, Helen Mickiewicz, for ORA, initiated two separated ex
parte communications. In the first communication, Mickiewicz met with Jose
Jimenez, adv. for Cmmr. Fessler. In the second communication, Mickiewicz met
with Fassile Fenikile, adv. for Cmmr. Neeper. Both communications took place
in SF.
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
October 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
Submittal; volume 241
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 16, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Cmmr.
Neeper in San Francisco. Also present were: Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr.
Neeper; Spencer Kaitz, President and General Counsel, and Glenn Semow, Director
of State Regulatory Affairs for CCTA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 17, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Fassil
Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper, in San Francisco. Also present was Cynthia
Walker, Regulatory Manager for CCTA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 17, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Cmmr.
Knight in San Francisco. Also present was Dorothy Duda, advisor to Cmmr.
Knight.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 17, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Cmmr.
Conlon in San Francisco. Also present were Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr.
Conlon, and Glenn Semow, Director of State Regulatory Affairs for CCTA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 16, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Jose
Jimenez, advisor to Cmmr. Fessler, in San Francisco. Also present were Glenn
Semow, Director of State Regulatory Affairs, and Cynthia Walker, Regulatory
Manager, for CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 10/15/96, Alan J. Gardner, CCTA, met with Cmmr. Duque in SF. Also present
were: Tim Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque, and Glenn Semow, CCTA. Gardner
suggested that the proposed decision should be adopted due to the failure by
PacBell and GTE to comply with the Commission's procedure,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On October 15, 1996, Helen Mickiewicz, counsel for the Office of Ratepayer
Advocates, wrote a letter to Cmmr. Knight, and she also delivered her July 15,
1996 letter to Cmmr. Fessler
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1996
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
corrects the ORA's ex parte filing, dated 10/11/96, calendared 10/15/96, to
show all proceedings on the daily calendar
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Late filed. On 10/3/96, Norman Low, for ORA, had three separate meetings with
Cmmr. Knight; Tim Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque; and Fassile Fenikele, adv. to
Cmmr. Neeper, in SF. Helen Michiewicz, for ORA was also present. Written
summary of ORA's position was used and is attached. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On October 7, 1996, John Gueldner, at PacBell, met w/Tim Sullivan, advisor for
Cmmr Duque, in SF. Richard W. Odgers, Pacific Telesis Group, & David P.
Discher, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group, were also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On October 4, 1996, John Gueldner, at PacBell, met w/Cmmr Neeper, in SF.
Fassil Fenikile, advisor for Cmmr Neeper, & David P. Discher, for Pacific
Telesis Legal Group, were also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On October 7, 1996, John Gueldner, at PacBell, met w/Cmmr Knight, in SF. Also
present were: Bob Lane, advisor for Cmmr Knight; Richard W. Odgers, Pacific
Telesis Group; & David P. Discher, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On October 4, 1996, John Gueldner, at PacBell, met w/Cmmr Conlon, in SF. Also
present were: Lester Wong, advisor for Cmmr Conlon; Robert J. Mazique, for
Pacific Telesis Legal Group; & David P. Discher, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CA, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
DRA/MICKIEWICZ
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
GTE WEST COAST INC.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP
|
|
Description:
Joint; to adopt Settlement Agreement pursuant to Article 13.5 of the
Commissions' Rules of Practice and Procedure
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 12, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On September 10, 1996, Richard Odgers, of Pacific Telesis Group, wrote a ltr to
Cmmr Knight transmitting PacBell's September, 1995 petition to modify & the
amendment filed in January of 1996, w/certain portions highlighted (copies of
the documents are attached to the notice)
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on ILP workshop report
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Sets procedural schedule; hearing - 10/7/96
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On 7/16/96, William C. Harrelson, MCI, met with Timothy Sullivan,
adv. for Cmmr. Duque in SF. Also present were Helen Mickiewicz, DRA; and
Walter Mosley, AT&T. Harrelson urged the Commission to reject GTEC Card
Services' Advice Letter #2,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On July 16, 1996, William C. Harrelson, for MCI, met w/Jose
Jimenez, advisor for Cmmr Fessler, & Richard Smith, advisor to Cmmr Conlon in SF
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On 7/16/96, William C. Harrelson, MCI, met with Fassil Fenikile,
adv. for Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Also present were: Helen Mickiewicz, DRA; and
Walter Mosley, of AT&T. Hareelson urged the Commission to Reject GTEC Card
Services' Advice Letter #2,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On 7/16/96, Walter Mosley, AT&T, met with Richard Smith, adv. for Cmmr. Conlon,
and Jose Jimenez, adv. for Cmmr. Fessler in SF. Others present were: Helen
Mickiewicz, DRA; and Bill Harrelson, MCI. Mosley, Mickiewicz, and Harrelson
stated that Commission approval of GTEC's Advice Letter 8114, etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On 7/16/96, Walter Mosley, AT&T, met with Tim Sullivan, adv. for Cmmr. Duque in
SF. Also present were: Helen Mickiewicz, DRA; and Bill Harrelson, MCI.
Mosley, Mickiewicz, and Harrelson stated that Commission approval of GTE's
Advice Letter 8114, etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On 7/16/96, Walter Mosley, AT&T, met with Fassil Fenikile, adv. for Cmmr.
Neeper in SF. Others present were: Helen Mickiewicz, DRA, and Bill Harrelson,
MCI. Mosley, Mickiewicz, and Harrelson stated that Commission approval of
GTEC's Advice Letter 8114, etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 7/15/96, Helen Mickiewicx for DRA, wrote a letter (attached) to Cmmr.
Fessler in SF. Mickiewicz stated that the Commission could not examine in
isolation the revenue losses PacBell and GTE claim to have suffered as a result
of toll stimulation lower than the ..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
CACD workshop set for 7/18/96; workshop reports due 7/31/96; cmmts on report
due 8/9/96
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 7/1/96, Norman Low of DRA met with Cmmr. Fessler in SF. Jose Jimenez, adv.
to Cmmr. Fessler; Helen Mickiewicz for DRA; Cynthia Morelli and Jim Brennan,
law clerks for Cmmr. Fessler were also present. DRA stated that the Commission
could not examine in isolation the revenue losses ..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED EX PARTE NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WHICH WAS
FILED 7/1/96 AND APEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF 7/5/96. On 6/28/96, Dick Odgers,
PacBell, met with Cmmr. Conlon in SF. Karen Jones of CACD was also present.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 1, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On 6/28/96, Dick Odgers, for PacBell, met with Cmmr.
Conlon in SF. Karen Jones of CACD was also present.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 27, 1996
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 6/24/96, Mark Savage for Intervenors, met with Cmmr. Fessler in SF. Also
present was Cmmr. Fessler's adv. Jose Jimenez,...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 25, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 6/20/96, Lynn Mowery, PacBell, met with Cmmr. Fessler in SF. Also present
were: Cmmr. Fessler's adv. Jose Jimenez; Cynthia Morelli and Jim Brennen,
summer interns; and John Gueldner, VP of PacBell. PacBell said that its total
intrastate revenues decreased by $350 million in 1995. Written materials were
used and are attached.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 6/17/96, Mary Vanderpan, PacBell, sent a letter to Cmmrs. Fessler, Conlon,
Knight, Duque and Neeper. Vanderpan requested that the Comm. reject CalTel's
arguments and continue their implemetation of the PSSC,.. written materials
used and attached.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Written cmmts due on 8/9/96
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 3, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: On May 15, May 16 & during the week of May 20th, the following
communications took place. On May 15, Janice Grau, for DRA, spoke w/ALJ
Bushey. On May 16, Grau spoke w/Cmmr Duque's advisor Tim Sullivan
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
June 3, 1996
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Correction to Daily Calendar of 06/4/96. The following docket numbers were
inadvertently omitted: A87-01-002, C96-11-028, C87-07-024, & I87-02-025
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 24, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 5/24/96, Mary L. Vanderpan, Reg. VP at PacBell, wrote a letter to Cmmr.
Fesler. Also receiving copies of the letter were Cmmrs. Conlon, Knight, Duque
and Neeper; ALJ Weismehl; Cmmr. Fessler's Adv. Jose Jimenez; Cmmr. Conlon's
adv. Richard Smith; Cmmr. Knight's advisor Robert Lane; Cmmr. Duque's adv. Tim
Sullivan; and Cmmr. Neeper's adv. Fassil T. Fenikile. PacBell expressed
concerns to the Commissioners on recent advice letters and motions that
requested rehearing and stay of Resolution T-15782 filed by the CALTEL, MCI,
and Sprint,...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
PHC is on 6/12/96. Motion of PacBell for procedural order commencing the
intraLATA presubscription phase of this proceeding & the joint petition for an
order requiring GTEC to immediately implement intraLATA equal access are
consolidated
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 15, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to motion of GTE California to modify Appendix A to D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 14, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Roseville Telephone Company's motion to establish memorandum accounts
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIS, INC.
|
|
Description:
to GTEC's petition to modify Appendix A of D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to CALDT's application for rehearing of D96-03-021
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to establish memorandum account relating to the implementation rate design
decision
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to Motion of MCI and Sprint for stay of Resolution T-15782
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to Applications of MCI and California Association of Long Distance Telephone
Companies for rehearing of Resolution T-15782
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 4/23/96, Norman Low, Project Manager for the DRA, met with Cmmr. Conlon in
SF. Also present were Helen Mickiewicz, staff counsel for DRA, and Cmmr.
Conlon's advisor Richard Smith. DRA stated that the Commission could not
examine in isolation the revenue losses PacBell and GTEC claim to have suffered
as a result of lower toll stimulation than anticipated in D94-09-065,...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CA. ASSOC. OF LONG DISTANCE TEL. COMP.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
Joint; to PacBell's motion for a procedural order commencing an intraLATA
presubscription phase
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to amended joint petition for an order requiring GTE California to immediately
implement intraLATA equal access; & to motion of PacBell for a procedural order
commencing the intraLATA presubscription phase of this proceeding
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to Joint Petition for an order requiring GTE California to immediately
implement intraLATA equal access
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to Joint Petition to require it to implement intraLATA equal access immediately
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On 4/12/96, Mary Vanderpan, Regulatory Vice President for PacBell,
met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Also present were John Gueldner, Vice
President Regulatory for PacBell, and Cmmr. Duque's advisor Tim Sullivan. A
handout(attached) ws provided. PacBell argued the following: the actual
increase in toll and switched access calling was more than $200 million below
that predicted by IRD; the data is straightforward; and there was to have been
a balance between revenue increases and decreases which, because the estimate
was too high, was not reached.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to GTEC's Motion for continuance of stay of 1996 price cap adjustment and to
establich memorandum account
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to joint Motion of GTEC and PacBell for establishment of memorandum account
relating to IRD decision
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the Joint Motion of GTE California and Pacific Bell for establishment of
memorandum account relating to the implementation rate design decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 4/15/96, Helen Mickiewicz of DRA, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Others were
present. DRA explained that the Commission could not examine in isolation the
revenue losses that PacBel and GTE claim to have suffered as a result of lower
toll..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
Appendix A to D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 16, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISHMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
Response to the Amended Joint Petition for an Order Requiring GTE California to
Immediately Implement IntraLATA Equal Access are due 4/26/96; & Responses to
the Joint Petition & the Motion of PacBell for a Procedural Order Commencing
the IntraLATA Presubscription Phase may be submitted in a single response
provided that parties doing so note the dual response in the title & clearly
indicate their positions & recommendations for each of the two pleadings to
which they are responding
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
|
|
Description:
of D96-03-021
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
for a procedural order commencing the intraLATA presubscription phase of the
proceeding
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP
|
|
Description:
Amended Joint; for an order requiring GTE California to immediately implement
intraLATA equal access
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 5, 1996, Lynn Mowery, for Pacific, met w/Cmmr Conlon in SF. Also
present were: John Gueldner, at Pacific; & Cmmr Conlon's advisor Richard Smith
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/3/96, Richard Odgers, Executive V.P. and General Counsel for Pacific
Telesis Group (PacBell), met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Also present were David
Discher, Senior Counsel for PacBell, and Cmmr. Neeper's advisor Fassil
Fenikile. A handout (attached) was used. PacBell stated that the actual
increase in toll and switched access calling was more than $200 million below
that predicted by IRD, and that there was to have been a balance of revenue
increases and decreases, but that was not reached because the estimate of
stimulation was too high,...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Joint; for establishment of memorandum account relating to the implementation
rate design decision
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
Joint; for an order requiring GTE California immediately to implement intraLATA
equal access
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Petition of GTEC to correct calculations in D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants GTE's motion for protective order
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 3/15/96, Brian Chang, Project manager for the DRA, met with Cmmr. Fessler in
SF. Also present were: Helen Mickiewicz, staff atty for DRA; Glenn Stover for
AT&T; Lee Burdick for CCTA; Peter Casciato for Time Warner; Michael Golabek and
Don Eachus for GTEC; and Cmmr. Conlon's advisor, Richard Smith. DRA stated
that it does not dispute that the Commission can modify D93-09-038, but argued
that the Commission must hold a hearing to do so.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 3/14/96, Brian Chang, Project Mgr. for the DRA, met with Cmmr. Conlon in SF.
Also present were Helen Mickiewicz, staff counsel for DRA, and Cmmr. Conlon's
advisor Richard Smith. DRA urged that GTE California not be relieved of its
settlement obligations, because GTEC was aware of the risks it was taking..,etc.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to accept late-filed petition & motion
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 3/7/96, Brian Chang of DRA, met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Others
were present. DRA urged the Commission not to relieve GTE of its settlement
obligations. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
of D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to place exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Donald C. Eachus under seal
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 3/7/96, Martin Mattes of CPA, delivered a letter to Cmmr. Fessler. The
letter concerned the intrLATA non-coin calls routing from pay telephones as
addressed in the Commission's recent decision in the above-captioned matter.
etc.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Motion of GTE California, Inc., to stay portion sof D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 3/6/96, Brian Chang of DRA, met with Cmmr. Knight in SF. Helen Mickiewicz
was also present. DRA explained the history of the settlement reached by
twelve parties to the 1992 NRF review, and the request by GTEC to modify the
decision adopting the settlement
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 28, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
requesting acceptance for filing of Request to Amendment of PacBell to Joint
Petition of PacBell and GTEC for Modification of D94-09-065; Response attached
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Late filed. On 2/20/96, Brian Chang of DRA met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Others
were present
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to stay portions of D96-02-023 on A-38 tariff adjustments
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 2/20/96, Thomas Keane, President of California Payphone Association (CPA),
met with Cmmr. Neeper's advisor, Fassil Fenikile, in SF. Also present was
Martin Mattes, attorney for CPA. Mattes stated that the decision denying
rehearing of the language addressing the routing of intraLATA "0+"
customer-owned pay telephones (COPT), might adversely affect the availability
of competitive service by local carriers,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 2/20/96, Thomas Keane, President of California Payphone Association (CPA),
met with Cmmr. Neeper's advisor, Jose Jimenez, in SF. Also present was Martin
Mattes, attorney for CPA. Mattes stated that the decision denying rehearing of
the language addressing the routing of intraLATA "0+" customer-owned pay
telephones (COPT), might adversely affect the availability of competitive
service by local carriers,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to reply of GTE California Incorporated (GTEC) to response to petition of GTEC
for modification of D93-09-038
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
grants motion of Pacific Bell to accept proprietary information under seal to
the extent as set forth
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 30, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 1/29/96, Lynn Mowery, Director of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Bell
(Pacific), met with Cmmr. Neeper's advisor, Fassil Fenikile in SF. Also
present were: Larry Taylor, Project Manager for Public Communications; Lenore
Alpert, Regulatory Mgr for Pacific
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 30, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 1/29/96, Lynn Mowery, Director of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Bell
(Pacific), met with Cmmr. Duque's advisor, Tim Sullivan in SF. Also present
were: Larry Taylor, Project Manager for Public Communications; Lenore Alpert,
Regulatory Mgr for Pacific; and Dan Jacobsen, Director-Network & Exchange
Services for Pacific.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to file information under seal
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
in opposition to GTE's petition for modification of D.93-09-038
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
CP NATIONAL
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
GTE CALIFORNIA
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
PACIFIC BELL
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY (THE)
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Amendment to Joint; of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Petition of C.P. National Corp.; Citizens Telecommunication Co. of
California, Inc.; Contel of California; Evan Telephone Co.; Foresthill
Telephone; GTE California Inc.; Kerman Telephone Co.; Pacific Bell; Ponderosa
Telephone Co.; Roseville Telephone Co.; and Tuolumne Telephone Co.; for
Modification of D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants petitioners' motion to accept their financial data under seal for
purposes of their joint petition to modify D94-09-065 as set forth
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. OF CA
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CP NATIONAL CORPORATION
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
PACIFIC BELL
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to accept their financial data under seal for purposes of their Joint Petition
to Modify D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
C.P. NATIONAL CORPORATION
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. OF CA
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
PACIFIC BELL
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ ECONOME-PUC
|
|
Description:
grants motion of PacBell and GTEC to accept proprietary information under seal
to the extent as set forth*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CORP.
|
|
Description:
On 9/28/95, Roy Lathrop, Mgr. of Reg. Affairs, MCI, met with Richard Smith,
advisor to Cmmr. Conlon, in SF.,etc.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
On September 28, 1995, Roy Lathrop of MCI, met w/Cmmr Duque's advisor Tim
Sullivan in SF *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CORP.
|
|
Description:
On 9/28/95, Roy Lathrop, Mgr. of Reg. Afffairs, MCI, met with Jose Jiminez,
advisor to Cmmr. Fessler, in SF.,etc*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
WILSON-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
to petition of GTE of California for modification of D94-09-065.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
GTE WEST COAST, INC.
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
to joint petition of Pacific Bell and GTE of California to modify D94-09-065.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
in opposition to joint petition of Pacific Bell and GTE of California for
modification of D94-09-065.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 1995
|
Filed By:
CAL. COMMTE. FOR LRGE. TELECOM. CNSMRS.
|
|
Description:
on joint petition of PacBell and GTEC for modification of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
MICKIEWICZ-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
to joint petition of PacBell and GTEC for modification of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
MICKIEWICZ-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
to joint petition of PacBell and GTEC for modification of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
On 9/20/95, Tim McCallion & Jenny Wong, GTE, met w/Cmmr Duque's advisor Tim
Sullivan in SF. Etc
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
On 9/20/95, Tim McCallion & Jenny Wong, GTE, met w/Cmmr Conlon & his advisor
Richard Smith in SF. Etc *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Of; To The Petition Of GTEC For Modification Of D.94-09-065.*
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
of D95-08-051 *
|
|
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENTAL
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
Filing of; Report Pursuant To D.95-08-051 In Support Of Their Request For
Compensation.*
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Of; To comments on intraLATA presubscription.*
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Joint; to accept proprietary information under seal*
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Joint; of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Of; Request for Official Notice Regarding GTEC's Petition for Modification of
D.89-10-031.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
reply; of intraLATA equal access.*
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
of DRA-Mickiewicz in response to ALJ's ruling *
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to opening comments filed on 7/31/95 *
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
reply*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES - GRAU
|
|
Description:
Of; In opposition to the petition of GTEC, Inc. for modification of D94-06-011*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
Of; In opposition to the petition of GTE California, Inc. for modification of
D94-06-011*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Of; Pacific Bell to the petition of GTEC for modification of D94-06-011.*
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
WEISMEHL/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Of; Denies motion of California Telecommunications Coalition to eliminate reply
comments concerning intraLATA equal access filed 7/31/95.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to motion of the California Telecommunications Coalition to eliminate reply
comments & to shorten time to respond to this motion.*
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
to motion of California Telecommunications Coalition to eliminate reply
comments & to shorten time to respond to this motion.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF LONG DISTANCE TEL.
|
|
Description:
In opposition to the motion of California Payphone Asso. to dismiss the
application of the California Asso. of Long Distance Telephone Companies for
rehearing of D.95-06-062.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMJUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
to the motion of California Payphone Asso. to dismiss the application of MCI
for rehearing of D.95-06-062.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On August 8, 1995, Richard Bromley, Vice-President - Government Affairs of AT&T
Communications of California, Inc., met with Cmmr. Fessler and Jose Jimenez,
Cmmr. Fessler's advisor, in San Francisco, etc*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On August 8, 1995, Richard Bromley, Vice-President - Government Affairs of AT&T
Communications of California, Inc., met with Cmmr. Knight and Jody London,
Cmmr. Knight's advisor, in San Francisco*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOC.
|
|
Description:
to applications of MCI & California Assoc. of Long Distance Telephone Companies
for rehearing of D.95-06-062.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
for rehearing filed by MCI & California Asso. of Long Distance Telephone
Companies.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
petition for modification of D.94-06-011 by GTEC.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ
|
|
Description:
to motion of the California Telecommunications Coalition to eliminate reply
comments.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
to eliminate reply comments & to shorten time to respond to this motion.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES - THAYER
|
|
Description:
On July 27, 1995, Kelly Boyd, Project Manager for the Commission's Division of
Ratepayer Advocates, and Rufus Thayer, Staff Attorney, met with Jose Jimenez,
Cmmr. Fessler's advisor, and Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San
Francisco, etc*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS'ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALIFORNIA-OREGON TEL. CO.
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO.
FORESTHILL TEL. CO.
HAPPY VALLEY TEL. CO.
HORNITOS TEL. CO.
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO.
THE PONDEROSA TEL. CO.
WINTERHAVEN TEL. CO.
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural scchedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALL OTHER FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES
U.S. DEPT. OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL (U 11 C)
EVANS TELEPHONE CO. (U 1009 C)
GTE WEST COAST INC. (U 1020 C)
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO. (U 1012 C)
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO. (U 1013 C)
SISKIYOU TELEPHON CO. (U 1017 C)
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO. (U 1018 C)
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO. (U 1019 C)
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to dismiss application of MCI Telecommunications Corporation for Rehearing of
D.95-06-062.*
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
of D.94-06-011.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to dismiss application of California Association of Long Distance Companies for
rehearing of D.95-06-062.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Exp DRA *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Application for Rehearing of D95-06-062 by California Association of Long
Distance Companies*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Application for Rehearing of D95-06-062 by MCI Telecommunications *
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
CA ASSN OF LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
of D95-06-062 *
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
of D95-06-062*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA
|
|
Description:
Jeffrey O'Donnell for DRA contacted Cmmrs Fessler, Conlon, Knight, & Duque by
ltr on 7/14/95. Etc. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Exp-GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1995
|
|
|
|
Description:
*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
on 7/3/95, Timothy J. McCallion, of GTE, wrote a letter (attached) to Cmmr.
Fessler. Copies of the letter were provided to others. The purpose of the
letter was to respond to the joint CACD/DRA "Report to the Commission....Tariff
A-41 Premise Visit Charge" GTE urged the Commission to take no action,...etc*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
On 7-3-95, Timothy J. McCallion, regulatory and governmental Affairs V.P-west,
for GTE, wrote a letter to Cmmr. Fessler (attached). Copies of the letter were
provided to Cmmrs. Conlon, Knight, and Duque; and administrative law judge
Weismehl. The purpose to the letter was to respond to the joint CACD/DRA
"Report to the commision regarding GTE's Practices in Assessing its Tariff A-41
Premise Visit Charge"... etc. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Exp SUROC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
exp; CBCH *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On 6/29/95, C. Edward Wolfe of Senior Utility Ratepayers of California wrote a
ltr. (attached to notice) to Cmmr. Conlon. The communication objected to the
low hourly rate used to compute SUROC's award as erroneously published in
D.95-06-034 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 30, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS LEARING HOUSE
|
|
Description:
On 6-30-95, Gerard F. Milano, of CBCH, sent a letter to Cmmr. Fessler
(attached). The letter commended the commission for moving forward on local
competition and universal issues and urged that the universal service docket
should be moved along quickly. In, addition, the letter expressed that the CBCH
had excercised and independent position on all telecommunications issues while
working with other interested parties in the Ca. Committee for Large Tele.
communications...etc *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC MCI
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: MCI *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CPA
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CPA *
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
the distribution of a document having the purported decision number,
D.95-06-058, was inaduertent and not reflect an official commision action *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
A.J. "TONY" DI TIRRO AND THOMAS MC DONALD OF MCI CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER & HIS
ADVISOR JOSE JIMENEZ ON 6/19/95 IN S.F. DI TIRRO DISCUSSED THE DRAFT "OPINION
ON PETITIONS OF MCI, SPRINT, CALTEL, AND PAC BELL TO MODIFY D94-09-065." THE D
RAFT OPINION INVOLVES THE REQUESTS OF MCI, SPRINT, AND CALTEL TO DELETE CONCLUS
ION OF LAW 132 FROM THE CAPTIONED DECISION, WHICH ADDRESSED ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CPA
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CPA *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOC.
|
|
Description:
ON JUNE 20, 1995, MARTIN MATTES OF CPA CALLED ADVISORS TO CMMR. FESSLER & CMMR.
KNIGHT, JOSE JIMENEZ & JODY LONDON, RESPECTIVELY, IN S.F. MATTES LEFT MESSAGES
ON BOTH ADVISORS' VOICEMAIL. MATTES SAID CPA SUPPORTED THE DRAFT DECISION ON T
HE JUNE 21 COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA THAT DENIES THE PORTIONS OF THE PETITIONS
FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 THAT ADDRESSED THE PSSC. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOC.
|
|
Description:
MARTIN MATTES OF CPA TELEPHONED CMMR. CONLON'S ADVISOR RICHARD SMITH ON 6/16/95
IN S.F. MATTES REFERRED TO A DRAFT DECISION ON THE AGENDA FOR THE COMMISSION'S
MEETING OF 6/21/95, WHICH WOULD DENY PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF THOSE PORTIO
NS OF D94-09-065 THAT ADDRESSED THE PSSC. MATTES EXPRESSED CPA'S SUPPORT FOR T
HE DRAFT DECISION AS PROPERLY SUSTAINING THE COMMISSION'S PRIOR ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 3-GTEC
|
|
Description:
3 EX-PARTE NOTICES: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
ON 6/13/95, JENNY WONG & FREDERICK HESS, GTE, MET WITH RICHARD SMITH, CMMR. CON
LON'S ADVISOR; IN A 2ND MEETING WONG & HESS MET WITH JOSE JIMENEZ, CMMR. FESSLE
R'S ADVISOR IN SF. ALSO ON 6/13 WONG & HESS MET WITH TIM SULLIVAN, ADVISOR TO
CMMR. DUQUE, AT 711 VAN NESS AVE., IN SF. THE SAME HANDOUT (ATTACHED) WAS DISC
USSED IN ALL 3 MEETINGS, WHICH SUMMARIZED THE KEY POINTS OF A 5/24 FILING,.ETC*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EXP-Sprint
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC SPRINT
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DICK ODGERS, PAC TELESIS, MET WITH CMMR. FESSLER AND HIS ADV. JOSE JIMENEZ, ON
6/7/95 AT THE OFFICE OF GOV'T AFFAIRS IN SACRAMENTO. ODGERS POINTED OUT THAT I
T IS IMPORTANT THAT THE NRF REVIEW BE COMPLETED THIS YEAR AND THAT THE TIME HAS
COME TO DO AWAY WITH THE NRF STRUCTURE,....ODGERS PROVIDED WRITTEN MATERIAL SH
OWING PACBELL'S ANNUALIZED ANNUAL REVENUE REDUCTIONS,....ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
Patrick McMahon of Sprint, contacted Cmmr. Conlon on 6/8/95 in SF. Others were
present. the Sprint reps noted that Sprint has an interest in a joint venture
with TCI, and that the venture would be offering local service in CA in
competitino with PacBell and GTE,...etc.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
RICHARD PURKEY, SPRINT, WROTE A LETTER(ATTACHED) TO CMMRS. CONLON ON 6/6/95. T
HE LETTER ADDRESSED SPRINT'S POSITION REGARDING THE RBOCS ENTRY INTO THE INTERL
ATA MARKET. SPRINT BELIEVED THAT THE RBOCS, INCLUDING PACBELL SHOULD BE ALLOWE
D TO ENTER ONLY AFTER THEIR POWER TO HARM THE COMPETITIVE LONG DISTANCE MARKET
HAS BEEN ELIMINATED,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 2-PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 EX-PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 4-PACBELL
|
|
Description:
4 EX-PARTES; PACIFIC BELL *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/31/95, DICK ODGERS, PACIFIC TELESIS, WROTE A LETTER TO CMMR. CONLON. COPI
ES OF THE LETTER WERE ALSO PROVIDED TO RICHARD SMITH & JOSE JIMENEZ, ADVISORS F
OR CMMRS. CONLON & FESSLER. THE PURPOSE OF THE LETTER WAS TO EXPLAIN WHY PACBE
LL NEEDS MORE PRICING FLEXIBILITY THAN THE PROPOSED INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION R
ULES PROVIDE,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/31/95, JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, WROTE A LETTER TO CMMR. CONLON (ATTACHED) A
COPY WAS PROVIDED TO RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. CONLON. THE PURPOSE OF
THE LETTER WAS TO PROVIDE WRITTEN MATERIAL (ATTACHED) ON THE BELL ATLANTIC-AT&T
LAWSUIT WHICH HAD BEEN DISCUSSED EARLIER ON 5/30/95 (SEE NOTICE FILED 6/2/95)
THE WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED EXCERPTS FROM THE 5/10/95 COURT OPINION,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DAVE DOREMAN, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 5/30/95 IN SF. DICK ODGERS,
PACIFIC TELESIS, AND RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON, WERE ALSO PRESENT.
ODGERS EXPRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF CONCLUDING THE NRF OII PRIOR TO THE 10/1/96
PRICE CAP FILING,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORTED
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO THE PROTEST OF CTC AND DRA TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR
ODIFICATION OF D94-12-053; REPLY ATTACHED *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, PACBEL, CONTACTED JOSE JIMENEZ, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER ON 5/31
/95 IN SF. LYNN MOWERY OF PACBELL WAS ALSO PRESENT. PACKBELL DISCUSSED THE RE
ACTION OF THE INVESTMENT COMMUNITY TO THE PROPOSED INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION RU
LES....,ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DAVE DOREMAN, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT ON 5/31/95 IN SF. DICK ODGERS,
PACIFIC TELESIS, AND JODY LONDON, ADVISOR TO CMMR. KNIGHT WERE ALSO PRESENT.
ODGERS EXPRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF CONCLUDING THE NRF OII PRIOR TO THE 10/1/96
PRICE CAP FILING,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DAVE DOREMAN, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. DUQUE ON 5/30/95 IN SF. DICK ODGERS,
PACIFIC TELESIS, AND TIM SULLIVAN, ADV. TO CMMR. DUQUE, WERE ALSO PRESENT.
ODGERS EXPRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF CONCLUDING THE NRF OII PRIOR TO THE 10/1/96
PRICE CAP FILING,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC MCI
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
respondants and interested parties to file issues relating to the
implesentation of intra-Local Acces & Transport Area equal acces on or before
7-31-95; responces to the issue and achedule proposals due by 8-31-95 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 30, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
ON 5/25/95, JENNY M. WONG, WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO CMMRS. FESSLER, CONLON,
KNIGHT, AND DUQUE. COPIES OF LETTER WERE ALSO PROVIDED TO OTHERS ADVS. IN THE L
ETTER WOND INDICATED ATH AN EDITED VERSION OF APPENDIX A AND B WAS ATTACHED TO
FACILITATE THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW OF GTEC'S COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION'S PROPO
SED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPETITION FILED ON 5/24/95. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CWA/AFL-CIO
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO DIST. 9
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ANN GRESSANI, MCI, DELIVERED WRITTEN MATERIAL (ATTACHED) TO TIM SU
LLIVAN, RICHARD SMITH, JOSE JIMENEZ, AND ROBERT LANE, ADVISORS TO CMMRS. DUQUE,
CONLON, FESSLER AND KNIGHT. THE WRITTEN MATERIAL CONSISTED OF A COPY OF "A BL
UEPRINT FOR ACTION: THE TRANSITION TO LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPETITION" IT IDENTIFI
ED AND PROVIDED SOLUTIONS TO 8 MAJOR BARRIERS TO LOCAL EXCHANGE,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMER
|
|
Description:
JANICE WOOD, CWA, WROTE IDENTICAL LETTERS TO CMMRS. FESSLER, DUQUE, CONLON AND
KNIGHT ON 5/19/95. THE LETTER ADDRESSED THE INTERIM RULES ON LOCAL COMPETI
TION IN CALIFORNIA AND THE NEED FOR NRF REFORM. WOOD STATED THAT THE INTERIM R
ULES CANNOT PROMOTE FAIR COMPETITION WITHOUT PROMPT AND SIGNIFICANT REFORM OF N
RF; THE COMMENCEMENT OF NRF REFORM HAS ALREADY BEEN GREATLY DELAYED,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 22, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LEE BAUMAN, MET WITH RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON AND OTHER ADVS. ON
5/17/95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE ALSO PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE PROPOSED LOCAL C
OMPETITION RULE. PACBELL INDICATED THAT COMPARED TO OTHER STATES, CALIFORNIA IS
MORE VULNERABLE TO CREAM-SKIMMING BY COMPETITORS AND LOSSES WILL OCCUR MUCH FAS
TER HERE. COMPETITORS ARE RAPIDLY TAKING LOCAL TOLL MARKET SHARE. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF GTEC FOR MODIFICATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR CLARIFICATION
OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF GTEC FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
TO ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHIL QUIGLEY, PT AND PACBELL, MET WITH CMMR. KNIGHT ON 5/12/95 AT THE VILLA TAV
ERNA RESTAURANT IN SF. QUIGLEY DISCUSSED THE FINANCIAL IMPACT ON PACBELL OF TH
E NRF STRUCTURE, THE COMMISSION'S PRPOSED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION,
AND INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION. QUIGLEY POINTED OUT THE COMPOUNDING EFFECT OF
THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR, THE LACK OF VOLUME INCREASES AND REVENUES,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 15, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/1/95, DICK ODGERS WROTE IDENTICAL LETTERS TO CMMRS CONLON, DUQUE, FESSLER
AND KNIGHT, COPIES WERE PROVIDED TO THE ADVISORS. THE LETTER EMPHASIZED THE CR
ITICAL ISSUES CURRENTLY FACING PACIFIC BELL AND REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION INI
TIATE ITS 1995 NRF REVIEW AT THE 5/25/95 MEETING AND CONCLUDE THE PROCEEDING AT
BY THE END OF SUMMER. ODGERS SAID THAT THE PACE OF CHANGE HAD QUICKENED, ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 15, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/12/95, JOHN A. GUELDNER, WROTE A LETTER, WITH ATTACHMENTS (ATTACHED) TO CM
MR. DUQUE AND COPIED THE SAME TO TIM SULLIVAN, ADV. TO CMMR. DUQUE. THE LETTER
SUMMARIZED THE ATTACHMENTS WHICH CONSISTED OF A TWO-PART REPORT ON BYPASS. THE
FIRST PART OF THE REPORT IS A ONE PAGE DOCUMENT TITLED "CPUC BYPASS REPORT." TH
E REPORT SHOWS THE EXTENT OF COMPETITION IMPACTING PACBELL. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL -
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL - SEE RECALENDARED NOTICE 5/12/95 FOR CORRECT ENTRY
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
IN COMPLIANCE WITH O.P. II, D93-05-062 MANAGEMENT AUDIT REPORT *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9412053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
CORRECTED NOTICE OF AN EXPARTE COMMUNICATION FILED ON 5/10 AND IN 5/11/95 D.C.
PHIL QUIGLEY, PACIFIC TELESIS, MET WITH CMMR DUQUE ON 5/5/95 AT THE ACT IV REST
AURANT IN SF. LYNN MOWERY, OF PACBELL INITIATED THE MEETING. THE PURPOSE OF T
HE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE FINANCIAL IMPACTON PACBELL OF THE NRF STRUCTURE,
THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSAL INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION,...ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 LATE FILED EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHIL QUIGLEY, COMMUNICATED WITH CMMR. FESSLER ON 5/4/95 AT VILLA TAVERNA RESTAU
RANT IN SF. LYNN MOWERY OF PG&E WAS ALSO PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE FINANCI
AL IMPACT OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK STRUCTURE, THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSED
INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, AND INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION. QUIGLEY PO
INTED OUT THE COMPOUNDING EFFECT OF THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR AND THE..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: ON 5/3/95, PHIL QUIGLEY WROTE THE SAME LETTER TO CMMRS FESSLER & D
UQUE. INCLUDED IN THE LETTER WAS A COVER NOTE DATED 5/4/95 FROM DICK ODGERS.
THE COVER NOTE STATED THAT PACBELL HAD BEEN DOWNGRADED BY DUFF & PHELPS. IN TH
E LETTER, QUIGLEY MADE THE FF POINTS: THE COMMISSION'S 4/26/95 PROPOSED RULES
FOR LOCAL COMPETITION WERE RECEIVED WITH SUCH UNIVERSAL ALARM, ETC..*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/4/95, PHIL QUIGLEY, WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO CMMR. KNIGHT. QUIGLEY POI
NTED OUT THAT THE CMMR.'S 4/26/95 PROPOSED RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION WERE REC
EIVED WITH SUCH UNIVERSAL ALARM BY THE INVESTMENT COMMUNITY THAT STANDARD AND P
OOR'S PUT PACBELL ON CREDITWATCH AND MOODY'S PUT PACBELL IN THE CATEGORY OF "NE
GATIVE OUTLOOK," AND THAT DUFF & PHELPS ACTUALLY DOWNGRADED PACBELL. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON THE PETITION OF GTEC RE PREAPPROVAL FOR FIBER BEYOND THE FEEDER *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
REPLY; *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN OPPOSITION TO PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF D8911031 *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN SUPPORT OF ITS PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031 TO REMOVE THE FIBER
PREAPPROVAL REQUIREMENT *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO PETITION OF GTEC FOR REMOVAL OF PROAPPROVAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FIBER
BEYOND THE FEEDER *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 2-PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL (2) FILED 5/4 AND 5/5/95
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHIL QUIGLEY OF PTG WROTE A LTR. (ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE) TO CMMR. CONLON ON 5
/3/95. THE LTR. REFERENCED QUIGLEY'S MEETING W/COMMR. CONLON ON 5/1/95 ) SEE N
OTICE OF EX PARTE FILED 5/4/95), & DISCUSSED PACBELL'S POSITION ON OPENING ALL
MARKETS TO COMPETITION. QUIGLEY STATED THAT PACBELL SHOULD MOVE AS QUICKLY AS
POSSIBLE TO THE POINT WHERE ALL COMPANIES CAN OFFER THE SAME SERVICES ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHIL QUIGLEY, PACIFIC TELESIS WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) WITH ATTACHMENTS TO CMM
R. CONLON ON 5/2/95. THE PURPOSE OF THE LETTER WAS TO EMPHASIZE THE CRITICAL I
SSUES CURRENTLY FACING THE COMMISSION AND PTG WHICH HAD BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE
COMMISSIONER ON 5/1/95 AND THE EFFECT OF THOSE ISSUES ON PACBELL'S COMMITMENT
TO CALIFORNIA INVESTMENT. THE LETTER POINTED OUT THE REACTION.,,,ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: ROSEVILLE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, PACBELL, MET WITH CMMR. CONLON ON 5/1/95 AT THE INN OF THE OPERA I
N SF. PHIL QUIGLEY, PTG WAS ALSO PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIALS USED AND ATTACHED
THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE IMPACT OF THE NRF STRUCTURE AND
THE RESULTS OF INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION ON PACBELL'S FIRST QUARTER EARNINGS,
AND THE PROPOSED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
MICHAEL D. CAMPBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 5/1/
95 IN SF. GREG GIERCZAK. LATER ON THE SAME DAY, CAMPBELL AND GIERCZAK ALSO CONT
ACTED CMMR. FESSLER AND HIS ADV, JOSE JIMINEZ, IN SF. THE SUBSTANCE OF THE COMM
UNICATIONS DURING BOTH MEETINGS WAS THE SAME. THE ROSEVILLE REPS. STATED THAT R
OSEVILLE SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO COMPLETE ITS RATE CASE BEFORE THE ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC AT&T
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE: AT&T - AUGMENTED NOTICE ORIGINALLY FILED ON 4/25/95 AND IN 4/27/95 DC
*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF AT&T FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PROTESTS OF GTEC AND PACBELL TO
PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 2-MCI
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: 2 MCI - LATE FILED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCTA
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED NOTICE ORIGINALLY FILED ON 4/25/95 AND IN 4/27/95 D.C. ON 4/20/95, R
ICHARD BROMLEY, AT&T MET WITH CMMR. KNIGHT OF SF. OTHERS WERE ALSO PRESENT. A
T&T DISCUSSED ROCHESTER TELEPHONE'S OPEN MARKET PLAN, THE LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPET
ITION TRIAL IN ROCHESTER, NY. AT&T CLAIMED THAT THE ROCHESTER TRIAL EMPHASIZED
THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUED COMMISSION OVERSIGHT OF LOCAL EXCHANGE,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC GTEC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: GTEC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC SCLC/NCLR/FAA/
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE, NCLR, FAA, FCRA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC MCI
|
|
Description:
2 LATE FILED EX PARTE NOTICES: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION, GTEC, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT ON 4/26/95 IN SF. JEFFREY KISS
EL, OF GTEC, WAS ALSO PRESENT. THE GTEC REPS DISCUSSED GTEC'S PROPOSAL FOR LOC
AL COMPETITION, THE KEY ELEMENTS OF ITS PLAN, AND THE NEED FOR THE CPUC TO ADOP
T A SOUND UNIVERSAL SERVICE PLAN PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPETITI
ON. GTEC NOTED THAT IT HAS DEVELOPED A COMPREHENSIVE UNIVERSAL,..ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH -SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH -SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
KOREAN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH -SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
FILIPINOS FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTI
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH-SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
FILIPINO CIVIL RIGHTS ADVOCATE
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH-SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
MEETING WITH CMMR CONLON AND ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 4/25/95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE
PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO INFORM THE COMMISSION OF TIME-WARNE
R'S AND TCI'S DESIRE TO ENTER INTO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMMON CARRIERS, THE COMPANIES' VIEWS ON LOCAL COMPETITION RULES AUTHORIZED BY
THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FOR ROCHESTER, NY, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 4/24/95, NATE DAVIS, OF MCI, CONTACTED CMMR KNIGHT IN SF. OTH
ERS WERE PRSENT. DAVIS EXPLAINED THE MISSION OF MCI METRO, ITS DESIRE TO EXPAN
D INTO LOCAL SWITCHED SERVICE, THE LEVEL OF ITS COMMITTED AND PLANNED INVESTMEN
T, AND THE NUMBER OF CITIES IN WHICH IT IS BUILDING AND PLANS TO BUILD FIBER RI
NGS AND INSTALL SWITCHES. DAVIS INDICATED THAT TRUE NUMBER PORTABILITY,.ETC..*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 4/24/95, NATE DAVIS, OF MCI, CONTACTED CMMRS FESSLER AND CONLO
N IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. DAVIS DESCRIBED MCI METRO'S INTENTION TO BE A W
IRELINE LOCAL SERVICE PROVIDER IN CALIFORNIA AND OTHER STATES AND PROVIDED A DE
SCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY'S CURRENT INVESTMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND BUSINESS PLANS.
DAVIS INDICATED THAT CERTAIN REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC GTEC-2
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: 2 GTEC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PROTEST OF DRA OF AT&T'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
OF D9409065; REPLY ATTACHED *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 4/24/95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE P
RESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE SUBSIDY FLOWS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN PLACE AND HO
W THEY WILL BE EFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPETITION. PACBELL AL
SO INDICATED THAT THE INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION SHOULD BE MODIFIED RU
LES FOR ENTRY, INTERCONNECTION, INTERIM NUMBER PORTABILITY,....ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC AT&T
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: AT&T * AUGMENTATION REQUIRED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC DEPT.
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: DEPT. OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: 4/20/95, WILLIAM HARRELSON MET WITH RICHARD SMITH, CMMR CONLON'S A
DV. IN SF. HARRELSON PRAISED THE COMMISSION FOR STICKING WITH ITS PREVIOUSLY A
NNOUNCED SCHEDULE BY ISSUING DRAFT PROPOSED RULES OF LOCAL COMPETITION ON APRIL
14/95. HARRELSON COMMUNICATED MCI'S CONCURRENCE WITH THE DRAFT RULE7S APPROAC
H. BOWEN STATED THAT THE DRAFT RULE'S PROPOSAL TO CHARGE, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/21/95, JOHN GUELDNER, SENT WRITTEN MATERIAL (ATTACHED) TO CMMRS. FESSLER,
CONLON, KNIGHT, DUQUE AND THEIR ADVS. PACBELL DISCUSSED FACTORS THAT IT BELIEVE
S AFFECTS SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPETITION. THEY STATED THAT THE
RE IS A LARGE AMOUNT OF INTRALATA TOLL CALLS IN CALIFORNIA, ABOUT A THIRD OF AL
L TOLL CALLS IN THE U.S. ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, TIMOTHY MCCALLION AND MICHAEL MCDONOUGH FOR GTE MET WITH CMMR. FESS
LER AND HIS ADVISOR, JOSE JIMENEZ, IN SF. IN A SEPARATE MEETING, ON 4/24/95, MC
CALLION AND MCDONOUGH MET WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADVISOR, RICHARD SMITH, ALS
O IN SF. THE GTEC REPRESENTATIVES DISCUSSED THE NEED FOR THE COMMISSION TO ADO
PT A SOUND UNIVERSAL SERVICE PLAN PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: 4/20/95, WILLIAM HARRELSON MET WITH JOSE JIMENEZ, CMMR FESSLER'S A
DV. AT STARS CAFE IN SF. HARRELSON PRAISED THE COMMISSION FOR STICKING WITH IT
S PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED SCHEDULE BY ISSUING DRAFT PROPOSED RULES OF LOCAL COMPET
ITION ON 4/14/95. HARRELSON COMMUNICATED MCI'S CONCURRENCE WITH THE DRAFT RULE
'S APPROACH. BOWEN STATED THAT THE DRAFT RULE'S PROPOSAL TO CHARGE, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. ON 4/20/95, RICHARD BROMLEY, AT&T MET WITH CMMR. KNIGHT
IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. AT&T CLAIMED THAT THE ROCHESTER TRIAL EMPHASIZED
THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUED COMMISSION OVERSIGHT OF LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPETITION.
AT&T PROVIDED THE PARTICIPANTS WITH A PRINTED DESCRIPTION OF THE LESSONS LEARNE
D. WRITTEN MATERIALS WERE USED AND ARE ATTACHED, ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
|
|
Description:
ON 4/21/95, RICHARD A. ELBRECHT, AND VIRGINIA J. TAYLOR, MET WITH CMMR. KNIGHT,
AND OTHERS, IN S.F. ELBRECHT DISCUSSED THE ECONOMIC POLICIES WHICH ARE THE BASI
S FOR THE DEPARTMENT'S RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING LOCAL COMPETITION, SAYING THAT
MANY THINK MANAGED COMPETITION HAS NOT WORKED WELL FOLLOWING THE AT&T DEVESTURE
. HE STATED THAT THE ALL REGULATION SHOULD BE PRO-COMPETITIVE, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/20/95, LEE BAUMAN, MARLIN ARD & LYNN MOWERY MET WITH CMMR KNIGHT IN SF. O
THERS WERE PRESENT. PACIFIC CLARIFIED AT&T'S PRESENTATION ON ITS EXPERIENCE IN
THE NEW YORK LOCAL COMPETITION TRIAL WITH ROCHESTER. AT&T IMPLIED THAT IT COU
LD NOT MAKE MONEY ON THE RESALE OF LOCAL SERVICE BECAUSE RESALE WAS NOT PRICED
LOW ENOUGH BY ROCHESTER. PACIFIC STATED THIS WAS IMPROPER, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCTA
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ/PULSIFER/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES GTEC'S MOTION TO OBTAIN A RULING ON THEIR PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF
D9412053 PRIOR TO THE COMMISSION'S ISSUANCE OF PROPOSED INTERIM RULES FOR COMME
NT *
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PROTEST OF DRA TO PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO DRA TO PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D94050
65 *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PROTEST OF DRA TO PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATIO
N OF D9409065 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/19/95, LYNN MOWERY, INITIATED A TELEPHONE CONTACT WITH JOSE JIMENEZ, CMMR.
FESSLER'S ADV. LEE BAUMAN OF PACBELL WAS PRESENT. PACIFIC DISCUSSED PREFIX ASSI
GNMENT, UNBUNDLING, AND INTERCONNECTION POINTS. THEY URGED THAT DRAFT RULES ON
LOCAL COMPETITION MUST MAKE CLEAR THAT THE NXX SERVICE AREA DEFINITION WILL MAI
NTAIN THE CURRENT PRACTICE; ETC... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/19/95, JOHN GUELDNER SENT WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE TO CMMRS FESSLER, CONLON,
KNIGHT & DUQUE. THE MATERIAL WAS PACIFIC'S FIRST QUARTER EARNINGS RELEASE, WH
ICH DISCUSSED PACIFIC'S VIEW OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS REFORM AND THE EFFECT OF THE
IRD AND THE 1995 ANNUAL NRF PRICE ADJUSTMENT ON REVENUES. THE RELEASE STATED
THAT REVENUES DECLINED BY 2.7% PRIMARILY FROM THE RATE BALANCING, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 2 PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND HIS ADV. JOSE JIMENEZ ON 4/18/95 IN SF
. LEE BAUMAN WAS PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED ITS PLAN FOR COMPETITION, "COMPET
ITION TO THE CORE". THE PLAN INTRODUCES LOCAL COMPETITION WITH UNBUNDLED ELEME
NTS ON 1/1/96, REFORMS REGULATION ALLOWING DOWNWARD PRICING FLEXIBILITY, FREEZE
S CUSTOMER PRICES FOR 3 YEARS, AND CONTINUES PACBELL'S COMMITMENT, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S MOTION TO OBTAIN RULING ON GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF
D94-12-053 PRIOR TO COMMISSION ISSUANCE OF INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
SPENCER KAITZ CONTACTED CMMR KNIGHT AND HIS ADV BOB LANE ON 4/19/95 IN SF FOR T
HE PURPOSE OF INFORMING THE COMMISSION OF COMCAST'S DESIRE TO ENTER INTO BUSINE
SS IN CALIFORNIA AS A TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIER, THE COMPANY'S VIEWS ON
LOCAL COMPETITION RULES AUTHORIZED BY THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMIS
SION FOR ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, ETC.. OTHERS WERE PRESENT... *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 20, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC GTEC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; IN SUPPORT OF ITS PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031 TO REMOVE THE FIBER
PREAPPROVED REQUIREMENT *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 BY GTEC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CUCC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED EX PARTE NOTICE: CUCC
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE PETITION OF GTEC REGARDING PREAPPROVAL FOR FIBER BEYOND THE FEE
DER *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO GTEC'S AND PA BELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D89-10-031;
UN-REDACTED VERSION ATTACHED UNDER SEAL *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
OPENING; *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
OPENING; *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OPENING; *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
OPENING; RESPONDING TO THE PETITION OF GTEC TO MODIFY D8910031 FOR REMOVAL OF
FIBER PREAPPROVAL REQUIREMENTS *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND TO SET PROCEDUR
AL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULE FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, CMMR. CONLON'S ADV., ON 4/13/95 IN SF.
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE CUSTOMER CONFUSION THAT WILL OCCUR I
F NEW COMPETITORS DO NOT FOLLOW THE EXISTING INDUSTRY NUMBER ASSIGNMENT PROCEDU
RES. CURRENTLY THE FIRST THREE DIGITS OF THE TELEPHONE NUMBER, THE NXX CODE, AR
E ASSOCIATED WITH A UNIQUE RATE CENTER TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN LOCAL AND ...,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILTIES COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: ON 4/12/95, SUSAN REDNER WROTE A LETTER TO CMMRS FESSLER, CONLON,K
NIGHT & DUQUE, COPIES TO THEIR ADVISORS. CITIZENS NOTED THAT IT HAD PARTICIPAT
ED ACTIVELY IN THE CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS ON VARIOUS TELECOMMUNICA
TIONS ISSUES THAT TOOK PLACE DURING JANUARY THROUGH MARCH, 1995. CITIZENS AFFI
RMED ITS COMMITMENT TO CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE PROCESS OF, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
JENNY WONG, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON; AND JOSE JIMENEZ, AD
V. TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 4/13/95 IN SF. FREDERICK HESSE OF GTEC WAS ALSO PRESENT
. GTEC'S REPS. ALSO CONTECTED ROBERT LANE, ADV. TO CMMR. KNIGHT, LATER ON THE S
AME DAY IN SF. GTEC DISCUSSED ITS PROPOSAL FOR LOCAL COMPETITION; THE KEY ELEME
NTS OF ITS PLAN; AND HOW IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTERIM RULES..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO. (CALTEL) AND
PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORTED
|
|
Description:
OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PROTESTS OF GTEC AND PACBELL TO PETITION OF AT&T F
OR MODIFICATION OF D9409065; REPLY ATTACHED *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 BY ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 NOTICES OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON 4/14/95, KATHRYN A FUGERE, COUNSEL FOR CALTEL, WROTE A LETTER WITH ATTACHMEN
TS (ATTACHED) TO CMMR. CONLON. COPIES OF THE LETTER AND ATTACHMENTS WERE ALSO
DELIVERED TO ALJS CAREW, CRAGG AND WEISMEHL. THE WRITTEN MATERIAL SUMMARIZED C
ALTEL'S POSITION ON THE PAY STATION SERVICE CHARGE (PSSC) CALTEL STATED THAT T
HE PSSC WAS THE MOST BURDENSOME FORM OF COMPENSATION BECAUSE IT REQUIRES,.ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, PACBELL, CONTACTED ROBER LANE, ADVISOR TO CMMR. KNIGHT, AND JOSE J
IMENEZ, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 4/12/95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE
PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS PACBELL'S 3/21 EX PARTE SUBMISSION TO THE
FCC ON ITS PENDING SECTION 214 APPLICAITONS. PACBELL DESCRIBED THE TECHNICAL
FUNCTIONALITY OF THE COMPONENTS OF HYBRID FIBER-COAX NETWORKS,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: 2 CALTEL; 1 PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT ON 4/10/95 IN SF., OTHERS WERE PRESENT. O
N THE SAME DAY GUELDNER ALSO CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH.
THE SAME SUBJECT MATTER WS DISCUSSED IN BOTH MEETINGS. PACBELL DISCUSSED ITS PL
AN FOR COMPETITION, "COMPETITION TO THE CORE". PACBELL INDICATED THAT THE COMMI
SSIONIS PURSUING TWO CONTRADICTORY, BUT IMPORTANT OBJECTIVES: ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: DRA/KALINSKY/PUC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC GTEC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9412053 BY GTEC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/KALINSKY/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE MEETING DISCUSS THE JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET
PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, FILED BY COALITION
ON 4/3/95. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSICIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON 4/10/95, THOMAS J. MACBRIDE, JR. AND KATHRYN A FUGERE, ATTYS FOR CALTEL, CON
TACTED JOSE JIMENEZ, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. CAL
TEL'S REPS DISCUSSED PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE $.25 PAY ST
ATION SERVICE CHARGE WHICH WAS ADDRESSED IN D94-09-065 AND AT SUBSEQUENT CACD W
ORKSHOPS. CALTEL URGED THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER ALL OF THE ISSUES,ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSICIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON 4/10/95, THOMAS J. MACBRIDE, JR. AND KATHRYN A FUGERE, ATTYS FOR CALTEL, CON
TACTED CMMR. CONLON & HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. CAL
TEL'S REPS DISCUSSED PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE $.25 PAY ST
ATION SERVICE CHARGE WHICH WAS ADDRESSED IN D94-09-065 AND AT SUBSEQUENT CACD W
ORKSHOPS. CALTEL URGED THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER ALL OF THE ISSUES,ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, LYNN MOWERY, PACBELL, CONTACTED ROBERT LANE, ADVISOR TO CMMR. KNIGHT
, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED ITS PLAN FOR LOCAL COMPETITIO
N, TITTLED "COMPETITION TO THE CORE." PACBELL INDICATED THAT THE PLAN WOULD AL
LOW LOCAL COMPETITION TO START 1/1/96. THE PLAN INTEGRATES UNIVERSAL SERVICE A
ND NRF REFORM WITH LOCAL COMPETITION. PACBELL ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED,...ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCLTC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CCLTC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCLTC ET AL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE TELECOMMUNCIATIONS; AT&T;
MFS INTELENET; TURN; CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN; MCI; SPRINT; DRA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CCLTC, AT&T, MFS, TURN, CCTA EX PARTE NOTICE: CCLTC, TCG, MCI,
CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCLTC, ET AL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE FILED BY CCLTC, TCG, CCTA, TURN, SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
OF D9412053 *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO OBTAIN RULING OF GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9412053 PRIOR TO COMMI
SSION'S ISSUANCE OF INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
MFS INTELENET
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIOSN CORP.
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS L.P.
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/KALINSKY/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
MFS INTELENET
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
4/5/95 MEETING WITH CMMR FESSLER & ADV JOSE JIMINEZ IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITI
ONS OF A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTI
CIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN P
ROVIDING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS THE C
OMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
4/5/95 MEETING WITH CMMR FESSLER & ADV JOSE JIMINEZ IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITI
ONS OF A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTI
CIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN P
ROVIDING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS THE C
OMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATION GROUP
|
|
Description:
4/5/95 MEETING WITH CMMR FESSLER & ADV JOSE JIMINEZ IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITI
ONS OF A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTI
CIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN P
ROVIDING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS THE C
OMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
4/5/95 MEETING WITH CMMR FESSLER & ADV JOSE JIMINEZ IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITI
ONS OF A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTI
CIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN P
ROVIDING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS THE C
OMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
ON 4/5/95, JOSEPH FABER WROTE IDENTICAL LETTERS TO CMMRS FESSLER, CONLON, KNIGH
T AND DUQUE. COPIES WERE PROVIDED TO THEIR ADVISORS. FABER, WRITING ON BEHALF
OF A COALITION OF PARTIES, EXPRESSED WILLINGNESS OF COALITION MEMBERS TO WORK
WITH THE COMMISSION IN COMMENCING LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPETITION IN CALIFORNIA. T
HE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED INCLUDED A LIST OF COALITION MEMBERS; JOINT MOTION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LIMITED; TO PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURE SCHEDULE ON
INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
OF AT&T'S PETITION TO MODIFY D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
ON 4/3/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH IN S
F. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE JOINT MOT
ION FILED BY A COALITION OF PARTIES REQUESTING THAT THE COMMISSION OPEN A RULEM
AKING INTO LOCAL COMPETITION AND THAT IT SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THE ISSU
ANCE OF INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION RULES BY THE SUMMER OF 1995. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
ON 4/3/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH IN S
F. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE JOINT MOT
ION FILED BY A COALITION OF PARTIES REQUESTING THAT THE COMMISSION OPEN A RULEM
AKING INTO LOCAL COMPETITION AND THAT IT SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THE ISSU
ANCE OF INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION RULES BY THE SUMMER OF 1995. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON 4/3/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH IN S
F. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE JOINT MOT
ION FILED BY A COALITION OF PARTIES REQUESTING THAT THE COMMISSION OPEN A RULEM
AKING INTO LOCAL COMPETITION AND THAT IT SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THE ISSU
ANCE OF INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION RULES BY THE SUMMER OF 1995. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
ON 4/3/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH IN S
F. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE JOINT MOT
ION FILED BY A COALITION OF PARTIES REQUESTING THAT THE COMMISSION OPEN A RULEM
AKING INTO LOCAL COMPETITION AND THAT IT SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THE ISSU
ANCE OF INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION RULES BY THE SUMMER OF 1995. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNCIATIONS
|
|
Description:
ON 4/3/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH IN S
F. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE JOINT MOT
ION FILED BY A COALITION OF PARTIES REQUESTING THAT THE COMMISSION OPEN A RULEM
AKING INTO LOCAL COMPETITION AND THAT IT SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THE ISSU
ANCE OF INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION RULES BY THE SUMMER OF 1995. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER CONTACTED CMMR KNIGHT & ADVS BOB LANE & JODY LONDON ON 4/4/95 IN
SF. GUELDNER REVIEWED THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN PACBELL'S "COMPETITION
TO THE CORE" PLAN ANNOUNCED 4/3/95: INTRODUCE LOCAL COMPETITION AS SOON AS 1/1/
96; UNBUNDLE THE LOOP FROM SWITCHIG ELEMENTS AT VERY REASONABLE RATES TO FACILI
TATE COMPETITION; ALLOW RESALE OF BASIC LOCAL SERVICE TO COMPETITORS, ETC....
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC DETERMINE PROCEDURE FOR FILING NOTICES OF INTENT TO CLAIM COMPENSATION
IN LOCAL COMPETITION PROCEEDING *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA,
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC DETERMINE PROCEDURE FOR FILING NOTICES OF INTENT TO CLAIM COMPENSATION
IN LOCAL COMPETITION PROCEEDING *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
KOREAN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CEN
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC DETERMINE PROCEDURE FOR FILING NOTICES OF INTENT TO CLAIM COMPENSATION
IN LOCAL COMPETITION PROCEEDING *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
FILIPINOS FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTI
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC DETERMINE PROCEDURE FOR FILING NOTICES OF INTENT TO CLAIM COMPENSATION
IN LOCAL COMPETITION PROCEEDING *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
FILIPINO CIVIL RIGHTS ADVOCATE
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC DETERMINE PROCEDURE FOR FILING NOTICES OF INTENT TO CLAIM COMPENSATION
IN LOCAL COMPETITION PROCEEDING *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES (1 LATE FILED): CPA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/3/95, JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, WROTE IDENTICAL LETTERS, (ATTACHED) TO CMMRS
FESSLER, CONLON & KNIGHT. IN ADDITION TO THE LETTER, ON 4/3/95, GUELDNER AND
LEE BAUMAN, FROM PACBELL, SPOKE BY PHONE WITH JOSE JIMENEZ, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FE
SSLER, AT 10:30 AND WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADVISOR, RICHARD SMITH AT 3 PM.
THE ABOVE CONTACTS ALL DISCUSSED PACBELL'S PLAN FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
ICG ACCESS SERVICES INC
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MFS INTELENET INC.
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO., L.P
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER AXS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DE
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETW
|
|
Description:
JOINT; TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM
RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
THOMAS KEANE CONTACTED JOSE JIMENEZ, ADV. TO CMMR FESSLER ON 3/30/95 IN SF. OT
HERS WERE PRESENT. CPA'S REPS DISCUSSED ISSUES RELATING TO THE PAY STATION SER
VICE CHARGE AS IT WAS ADDRESSED IN D9409065. THEY DESCRIBED THE HISTORICAL BAC
KGROUND OF PSSC AND EMPHASIZED ITS IMPORTANCE AS A MEANS OF REQUIRING ALL WHO P
LACE REVENUE-GENERATING INTRALATA CALLS TO CONTINUE TOWARD THE COST, ETC.......
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: THOMAS KEANE CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR CONLON ON 3/28/
95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. CPA'S REPS DISCUSSED ISSUES RELATING TO THE PAY
STATION SERVICE CHARGE AS IT WAS ADDRESSED IN D9409065. THEY DESCRIBED THE HIS
TORICAL BACKGROUND OF PSSC AND EMPHASIZED ITS IMPORTANCE AS A MEANS OF REQUIRIN
G ALL WHO PLACE REVENUE-GENERATING INTRALATA CALLS TO CONTINUE TOWARD THE, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE; SPRINT*
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REPORT OF THE PARTIES ON NEGOTIATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO INTERIM OPINION
D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT ITS RESPONSE TO PETITION'S MADE BY AT&T AND MCI IN SUPPORT OF CALTEL'
S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS L.P.
|
|
Description:
ON 3/27/95, RICHARD PURKEY, SPRINT, WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO CMMR. FESSLER.
THE LETTER DISCUSSED ISSUES REGARDING THE PAY STATION SERVICE CHARGE (PSSC), AN
D THE DRAFT OPINION TO MODIFY D94-09-065. SPRINT POINTED OUT THAT THE DO MAKES
IT CLEAR THAT THE COMMISSION HAVE NOT YET DETERMINED WHETHER EXPLICIT COMPENSA
TION IS NECESSARY, OR WHETHER THE PSSC MECHANISM IS THE APPROPRIATE,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATIO
N OF D94-09-065; RESPONSE ATTACHED*
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
March 20, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CALTEL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
March 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CALTEL'S PM OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
March 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF CALTEL FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
March 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
TO CALTEL PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT ITS SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065; SUPPORT ATTAC
HED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIR ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON 3/15/95, THOMAS J. MACBRIDE, JR., WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO CMMR. FESSLER
. COPIES OF THE LEETER WERE DELIVERED TO ALJS CAREW, CRAGG AND WEISMEHL. THE LE
TTER WAS IN RESPONSE TO EARLIER EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS FROM PACBELL, CPS, MCI,
AND G-FIVE RE THE DRAFT DECISION RULING ON THE PETITIONS TO MODIFY D94-09-065.
MACBRIDE URGED THE COMMISSION TO ADOPT THE DRAFT OPINION CURRENTLY HELD...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, CONTACTED JOSE JIMENEZ, ADV. TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 3/14/95 IN SF.
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL EXPRESSED CONCERNS ON THE DRAFT OPINION OF THE CMM
N'S RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR MODIFICATION BY CALTEL, MCI, AND SPRINT. PACBELL
OBJECTED TO THE DRAFT DECISION'S REVISION OF CONCLUSION OF LAW 132 OF D9409065.
PACBELL EXPLAINED THAT THE OWNERS OF PUBLIC PAYPHONES ARE ENTITLED...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL & G-FIVE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
G-FIVE CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
ON 3/8/95, MICHAEL THOMPSON WROTE A LETTER TO CMMR FESSLER (ATTACHED) TO CMMR F
ESSLER, AND COPIED SAME TO CMMRS CONLON & KNIGHT; ALJS CRAGG & WEISMEHL. THE L
ETTER RELATED TO RECENT COMMUNICATIONS BY MCI AND CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN WITH
MEMBERS OF CACD WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE, PER D9409065, FOR CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS AN
D PREPARING A REPORT TO THE COMMISSION RE: PAY STATION SERVICE CHARGE, ETC.....
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
SUBMITTAL; VOLUME 233
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV TO CMMR CONLON ON 3/10/95 IN SF. OTHE
RS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL EXPRESSED CONCERNS ON THE DRAFT OPINION OF THE COMMIS
SION'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION BY THE CALIFORNIA ASSN OF LONG DI
STANCE TELEPHONE COMPANIES, MCI AND SPRINT. PACBELL OBJECTED TO THE DRAFT DECI
SION'S REVISION OF CONCLUSION OF LAW 132 OF D9409065, ETC......................
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 BY AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETW
|
|
Description:
OF INTENT TO CLAIM COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. NOTICE OF EX PARTE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CPA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 2/27/95 THOMAS E. MCDONALD, WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO S. ROBE
RT WEISSMAN, OF CACD. COPIES OF THE LETTER WERE DELIVERED TO CMMRS. FESSLER, CO
NLON AND KNIGHT. THE LETTER ADDRESSED WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE PAY S
TATION SERVICE CHARGE AND STATED MCI'S POSITION THAT LATE FILED COMMENTS FROM
PACBELL AND CALIF. PAYPHONE RE A DRAFT WORKSHOP REPORT SHOULD BE DISREGARDED..
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FROM CMMR. SHUMWAY TO CMMR. FESSLER
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
ON 3/2/95, MARTIN A MATTES, WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO S. ROBERT WEISSMAN, OF
CACD. COPIES OF THE LETTER WERE ALSO PROVIDED TO CMMRS. FESSLER, CONLON, KNIGHT
, AND ALJS CRAGG AND WEISMEHL. THE LETTER ANSWERED CHARGES BY MCI AND OTHER INT
EREXCHANGE CARRIERS THAT ABUSES OF DUE PROCESS EITHER HAD OCCURRED OR MIGHT OCC
UR IN CONNECTION WITH THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER AND..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
February 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ALJS CRAGG AND WEISMEHL ASSIGNED TO PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL & AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
RICHARD BROMLEY DELIVERED WRITTEN MATERIALS TO CMMRS FESSLER, CONLON AND KNIGHT
ON 2/23/95 IN SF. THE MATERIALS OUTLINED THE FOLLOWING AT&T POSITIONS; AT&T
AGREES WITH THE FCC'S ORDER REQUIRING THE LECS TO OFFER EXPANDED INTERCONNECTIO
N FOR SPECIAL ACCESS; AT&T SUPPORTS COST-BASED RATES FOR LOCAL TRANSPORT; AT&T
SUPPORTS THE NINE CONDITIONS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF, ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO DRA'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO REQUEST AN EXPEDITED DECISION ON ITS 10/14/94 PM
OF D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
TO DRA'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO REQUEST AN EXPEDITED DECISION ON ITS 10/14/94 PM
OF D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 2/23/95, JOHN GUELDNER SENT A LETTER TO CMMR FESSLER WITH COPIES TO CMMRS CO
NLON AND KNIGHT AND THEIR ADVISORS, CHIEF ALJ CAREW AND ALJS CRAGG AND WEISMEHL
. THE LETTER EXPRESSED PACBELL'S CONCERNS ON THE DRAFT OPINION OF THE COMMISSI
ON'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 BY CALTEL, MCI AND SPRI
NT. PACBELL OBJECTED TO THE DRAFT DECISION'S REVISION OF CONCLUSION OF, ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
February 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE REQUEST OF CALTEL THAT THE COMMISSION SHORTEN THE PERIOD OF TIME IN WHIC
H TO RESPOND TO THIS PETITION TO 15 DAYS, WHICH REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN PARAGRA
PH 25 OF CALTEL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISSMEHL/CRAGG/PUC
|
|
Description:
THE BAN ON EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS ON PHASE III, IRD, SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT ON
LY FOR SUBJECTS OF APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065; ELIMINATES THE BA
N ON EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS ESTABLISHED BY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 BY CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANC
E TELEPHONE COMPANIES
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO INTEREXCHANGE ACCESS COALITION'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST AN EXPEDITED DECISION ON 10/14/95 PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9406
011 BY DRA
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF INTERIM OPINION FILED BY INTEREXCHANGE ACCESS C
OALITION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN
|
|
Description:
ON 2/6/95, MARTIN MATTES WROTE A LETTER TO CMMR FESSLER AND COPIED CMMRS SHUMWA
Y, CONLON, KNIGHT; CHIEF ALJ CAREW; AND ALJS CRAGG AND WEISMEHL. THE LETTER EX
PRESSED CONCERN ABOUT ASPECTS OF A DRAFT OPINION INCLUDED AS AGENDA ITEM 2 FOR
THE COMMISSION AGENDA FOR THE 2/8/95 MEETING, RESPONDING TO THE PETITIONS OF MC
I AND CALTEL FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065. THE LETTER OBJECTED TO, ETC........
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO IAC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS CCTA'S 1/23/95 REQUST TO POSTPONE THE HEARINGS INTO THE PETITION TO MODI
FY D89-10-031 FILED BY GTEC; RESETS HEARINGS DATES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
January 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-12-053 BY INTEREXCHANGE ACCESS COALITION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
INTEREXCHANGE ACCESS COALITION
|
|
Description:
REQUESTING SHORTENED TIME FOR FILING PROTESTS
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
INTEREXCHANGE ACCESS COALITION
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-12-053
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9412053 BY INTEREXCHANGE ACCESS COALITION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
January 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
JOHN SUMPTER TELEPHONED RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR CONLON ON 1/10/95 IN SF. S
UMPTER STATED THAT BOTH PACIFIC BELL AND GTE WERE BLOCKING INTRALATA TOLL DIREC
TORY ASSISTANCE CALLS WHEN THE CUSTOMER ATTEMPTS TO USE AN INTEREXCHANGE CARRIE
R FOR THE CALLS BY DIALING 10XXX-1-NPA-555-1212. HE FURTHER STATED THAT THE IR
D DECISION ALLOWS CUSTOMERS TO PLACE SUCH DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE CALLS, ETC......
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
January 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
INTEREXCHANGE ACCESS COALITION
|
|
Description:
OF D9412053
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S AND GTEC'S OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN G.I. FORUM AND LATINO ISSUES FOR
UM'S REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S AND GTEC'S OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN G.I. FORUM AND LATINO ISSUES FOR
UM'S REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ALAN J. GARDNER CONTACTED CMMR CONLON & HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 1/5/95 IN SF.
GARDNER ASKED THE COMMISSION HOW HE THOUGHT THE SCHEDULING ORDER MIGHT BE IMPL
EMENTED AND HOW HE THOUGHT THE 90-DAY NEGOTIATION PERIOD MIGHT WORK. GARNER AD
VISED THAT CCTA INTENDED TO EXERT ITS BEST EFFORTS, WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE A
NNOUNCED COALITION, TO MAKE THE ORDER WORK
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ALAN J. GARDNER CONTACTED CMMR SHUMWAY ON 1/6/95 IN SF. GARDNER ASKED THE COMM
ISSION HOW HE THOUGHT THE SCHEDULING ORDER MIGHT BE IMPLEMENTED AND HOW HE THOU
GHT THE 90-DAY NEGOTIATION PERIOD MIGHT WORK. GARNER ADVISED THAT CCTA INTENDE
D TO EXERT ITS BEST EFFORTS, WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE ANNOUNCED COALITION, TO
MAKE THE ORDER WORK
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
January 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
January 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ALAN J. GARDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER AND HIS ADV, JOSE JIMENEZ, ON 1/3/95
IN SF. GARDNER ASKED THE COMMISSIONER HOW HE THOUGHT THE SCHEDULING ORDER MIGHT
BE IMPLEMENTED AND HOW HE THOUGHT THE 90-DAY NEGOTIATION PERIOD MIGHT WORK.
GARDNER STATED THAT CCTA INTENDED TO EXERT ITS BEST EFFORTS, WHIN THE CONTEXT
OF THE ANNOUNCED COALITION, TO MAKE THE ORDER WORK
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ALAN J. GARDNER CONTACTED CMMR KNIGHT ON 12/29/94 IN SF. GARDNER ASKED THE COM
MISSIONER HOW HE THOUGHT THE SCHEDULING ORDER MIGHT BE IMPLEMENTED AND HOW HE T
HOUGHT THE 90-DAY NEGOTIATION PERIOD MIGHT WORK
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS CABLE COMPANIES' MOTION TO QUASH; GRANTS CABLE COMPANIES' MOTIONS FOR LE
AVE TO FILE REPLIES TO PACBELL'S RESPONSE; FILE REPLIES TO PACBELL'S RESPONSE
TO MOTION TO QUASH AS OF TODAY'S DATE (12/28/94)
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
3 EX PARTE NOTICES: COUNTY OF LA/CBCH
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISSMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS TURN AND HISPANIC PARTIES TO FILE THEIR REPLIES RE COMPENSATION REQUEST,
DUE 1/6/95
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT ITS REPLY TO GTEC'S RESPONSE TO TURN'S, LATINO ISSUES FORUM'S AND AME
RICAN G.I. FORUM'S REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION; REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED NOTICE OF EX PARTE: TURN
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF PACBELL TO MODIFY D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D949065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D949065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D949065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D949065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D949065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D949065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOULUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALLIED PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF PACBELL TO MODIFY D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE DIRECTORIES CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF PETITION OF PACBELL TO MODIFY D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. THOMAS LONG, MET WITH CMMR.CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 12
/16/94 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. LONG RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION NOT ORD
ER THE PARTIES INTO A "GLOBAL SETTLEMENT" EFFORT ON THE VARIOUS ISSUES RELATED
TO EXPANDED COMPETITION UNTIL THE COMMISSION HAS LAUNCHED THE PROCEEDINGS AND
ESTABLISHED THE SCHEDULES THAT WILL GOVERN THOSE PROCEEDINGS. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
ON 12/21/94, JOSEPH FABER AND OTHERS CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND HIS ADVISOR RICH
ARD SMITH IN SF. LATER THEY CONTACTED ROBERT LANE, ADV. TO CMMR KNIGHT AND JOS
E JIMENEZ, ADV. TO CMMR FESSLER IN SEPARATE MEETINGS. LA/CBCH EXPRESSED A CONC
ERN THAT THE COMMISSION SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN ANY SETTLEMENT DISCUSSION; THAT T
HE SETTLEMENT PROCESS NOT USED TO DRIVE WEDGES BETWEEN COALITION MEMBERS, ETC..
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
ON 12/21/94, JOSEPH FABER AND OTHERS CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND HIS ADVISOR RICH
ARD SMITH IN SF. LATER THEY CONTACTED ROBERT LANE, ADV. TO CMMR KNIGHT AND JOS
E JIMENEZ, ADV. TO CMMR FESSLER IN SEPARATE MEETINGS. LA/CBCH EXPRESSED A CONC
ERN THAT THE COMMISSION SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN ANY SETTLEMENT DISCUSSION; THAT T
HE SETTLEMENT PROCESS NOT USED TO DRIVE WEDGES BETWEEN COALITION MEMBERS, ETC..
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: DRA
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF PACBELL TO MODIFY D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DENNIS EVANS, CONTACTED JOSE JIMENEZ, ADV. TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 12/20/94 IN SF.
LYNN MOWERY FROM PACBELL WAS PRESENT. THE PACBELL REPS DISCUSSED THE PRODUCTIVI
TY FACTOR AND THE NEED FOR NRF REFORM. EVANS STATED THAT THE COMMISSION SHOULD
KEEP TO THE NRF REVIEW SCHEDULE, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADJUSTIN
G THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR AND MOVING TO PURE PRICE REGULATION. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DENNIS EVANS, CONTACTED JOSE JIMENEZ, ADV. TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 12/20/94 IN SF.
LYNN MOWERY FROM PACBELL WAS PRESENT. THE PACBELL REPS DISCUSSED THE PRODUCTIVI
TY FACTOR AND THE NEED FOR NRF REFORM. EVANS STATED THAT THE COMMISSION SHOULD
KEEP TO THE NRF REVIEW SCHEDULE, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADJUSTIN
G THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR AND MOVING TO PURE PRICE REGULATION. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/KALINSKY/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON 12/19/94, TIM SULLIVAN AND IRA KALINSKY MET WITH CMMR KNIGHT IN SF. OTHERS
WERE PRESENT. HELEN MICKIEWICZ INITIATED THE MEETING AS A FOLLOW-UP TO THE FUL
L PANEL HEARING OF 12/15/94. DRA URGED THAT A SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS AS DESCR
IBED IN THEIR COMMENTS FILED 11/17/94 BE ADOPTED. WRITTEN MATERIALS WERE USED
AND ATTACHED.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, MET WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADVISOR, RICHARD SMITH,
ON 12/20/94. JENNY WONG WAS ALSO PRESENT. GUELDNER STATED THAT NRF REFORM IS
LINKED TO THE ISSUES OF LOCAL COMPETITION, UNBUNDLING, INTERCONNECTION, PRESUBS
CRIPTION, AND INTERLATA RELIEF, AND THAT THESE ISSUES MUST BE RESOLVED IN AN IN
TEGRATED MANNER.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: COUNTY OF LA/CBCH
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 12/16/94, DAVE DORMAN WROTE IDENTICAL LETTERS TO CMMRS FESSLER, ECKERT, CONL
ON, SHUMWAY AND KNIGHT. DORMAN EMPHASIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COMMISSION'S U
PCOMING DECISION ON ITS PROCEDURAL APPROACH TO LOCAL COMPETITION AND REGULATORY
REFORMS. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE ISSUES OF UNBUNDLING, INTERCONNECTION, NRF R
EFORM AND UNIVERSAL SERVICE ARE INEXTRICABLY RELATED, AS ARE INTERLATA, ETC....
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
A GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR. CONLON WAS HELD ON 12/16/94. JOSEPH S. FABER, COUNS
EL FOR CO. OF LA AND CBCH ADDRESSED THE FOLLOWING 3 SUBJECTS: 1) COMMR. CONLON'
S PUBLIC SUGGESTION AT THE 12/15 FULL PANEL HEARING THAT THE PARTIES TO VARIOUS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROCEEDINGS SHOULD ATTEMPT A GLOBAL SETTLEMENT; 2) THE LACK
OF ANY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ISSUES OF NRF REFORM AND PRESUBSCRIPTION,.ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
A GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR. CONLON WAS HELD ON 12/16/94. JOSEPH S. FABER, COUNS
EL FOR CO. OF LA AND CBCH ADDRESSED THE FOLLOWING 3 SUBJECTS: 1) COMMR. CONLON'
S PUBLIC SUGGESTION AT THE 12/15 FULL PANEL HEARING THAT THE PARTIES TO VARIOUS
TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROCEEDINGS SHOULD ATTEMPT A GLOBAL SETTLEMENT; 2) THE LACK
OF ANY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ISSUES OF NRF REFORM AND PRESUBSCRIPTION,.ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION BY TURN
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION BY LATINO ISSUES FORUM AND AMERICAN G.I
. FORUM
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION BY TURN
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION BY LATINO ISSUES FORUM AND AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 AUGMENTED NOTICES OF 12/12/94 EX PARTE IN 12/13/94 D.C. BY PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
3 AUGMENTED NOTICES OF 12/12/94 EX PARTE AND IN 12/14/94 D.C. BY PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. 3 NOTICES OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF 12/12/94 EX PARTE IN 12/13/94 D.C. PHIL QUIGLEY,
MET WITH CMMRS. KNIGHT AND CONLON AND THEIR ADVS. IN 2 SEPARATE MEETINGS.
WRITTEN MATERIALS WERE USED (ATTACHED). QUIGLEY REFERRED TO GOVERNOR WILSON'S
EXPECTATION THAT THE COMMISSION MOVE QUICKLY TO IMPLEMENT ITS INFRASTRUCTURE
REPORT AND STATED THAT PACBELL IS COMMITTED TO ASSIST. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF 12/12/94 EX PARTE AND IN 12/14/94 D.C. PHIL QUIG
LEY, MET WITH CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER AND THEIR ADVS. IN 3 SEPARATE
MEETINGS ON 12/7/94 IN SF. WRITTEN MATERIALS WERE USED AND ATTACHED. QUIGLEY RE
FERRED TO GOVERNOR WILSON'S EXPECTATION THAT THE COMMISSION MOVE QUICKLY TO IMP
LEMENT ITS INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT AND STATED THAT PACBELL IS COMMITTED ...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED NOTICE OF EX PARTE FILED 12/12/94 AND CALENDARED 12/13/94. PHIL QUIG
LEY AND DICK ODGERS MET WITH CMMR FESSLER AND HIS ADV. JOSE JIMENEZ ON 12/7/94
IN SF. LYNN MOWERY WAS ALSO PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIALS WERE USED (ATTACHED).
QUIGLEY REFERRED TO GOV. WILSON'S EXPECTATION THAT THE COMMISSION MOVE QUICKLY
TO IMPLEMENT ITS INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT AND SAID THAT PACBELL IS COMMITTED, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. (3 NOTICES) PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. PHIL QUIGLEY, AND LYNN MOWERY, AND OTHERS MET WITH CMMRS
KNIGHT, CONLON, FESSLER AND THEIR ADVS., IN 3 SEPARATE MEETINGS ON 12/7/94.
WRITTEN MATERIALS WERE USED (ATTACHED). QUIGLEY REFERRD TO GOVERNOR WILSON'S
EXPECTATION THAT THE COMMISSION MOVE QUICKLY TO IMPLEMENT ITS INFRASTRUCTURE RE
PORT AND STATED THAT PACBELL IS COMMITTED TO ASSISTING THE COMMISSION..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. LYNN MOWREY, PACBELL, INITIATED A CONVERSATION WITH CMM
RS. FESSLER, CONLON AND KNIGHT IS 3 SEPARATE COMMUNICATIONS. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. WRITTEN MATERIAL USED. PHIL QUIGLEY, PACIFIC TELESIS, ALSO PARTICIPATED I
N THE 3 MEETINGS AND REFERRED TO GOVERNOR WILSON'S EXPECTATION THAT THE COMMISS
ION MOVE QUICKLY TO IMPLEMENT ITS INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT AND STATED THAT,..ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION TO MODIFY D9409065 BY PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS PACBELL'S 12/7/94 MOTION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME; PROTESTS TO
PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065, FILED 12/7/94, DUE 12/23/94
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CMMR/SHUMWAY/PUC
|
|
Description:
RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSED PROCEDURAL PLAN
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN A. GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY AND HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 12/2/
94 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE STATE OF COMPETITION IN TH
E TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY AND THE NEED FOR REGULATORY REFORM. PACBELL STAT
ED ITS SUPPORT FOR THE OPENING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKET AND PRESUBSCRIPTION
WITH THE PROVISION THAT PRESUBSCRIPTION BE PHASED TO ALLOW FULL ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN A. GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY AND HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 12/2/
94 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE STATE OF COMPETITION IN TH
E TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY AND THE NEED FOR REGULATORY REFORM. PACBELL STAT
ED ITS SUPPORT FOR THE OPENING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKET AND PRESUBSCRIPTION
WITH THE PROVISION THAT PRESUBSCRIPTION BE PHASED TO ALLOW FULL ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARY VANDERPAN, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY AND HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 12/1/94
IN SF. PHIL QUIGLEY, OF PACIFIC TELESIS, WAS PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETIN
G WAS TO DISCUSS IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMISSION'S INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT, PRESUBSC
RIPTION, AND THE SCHEDULE FOR THE 1995 REVIEW OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK.
QUINGLEY EXPLAINED THAT PACBELL SUPPORT THE OPENING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARY VANDERPAN, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY AND HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 12/1/94
IN SF. PHIL QUIGLEY, OF PACIFIC TELESIS, WAS PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETIN
G WAS TO DISCUSS IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMISSION'S INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT, PRESUBSC
RIPTION, AND THE SCHEDULE FOR THE 1995 REVIEW OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK.
QUINGLEY EXPLAINED THAT PACBELL SUPPORT THE OPENING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JAY BENNETT, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 11/30/94 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. BENNETT AND HARRIS DISCUSSED THE POSITION PACBELL HAS
TAKEN BEFORE THE FCC ON VIDEO DIALTON COST ALLOCATION, SPECIFICALLY THAT THE AL
LOCATION OF COMMON COSTS SHOULD BE BASED ON DIRECT INVESTMENTS. THEY ALSO EXPLA
INED THAT CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION IS WRONG IN ITS..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF PACBELL FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
ASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
CMMR. SHUMWAY; ALJS CRAGG AND WEISMEHL TO PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-09-
065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO PACBEL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
OF PACBELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
December 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAY PHONE ASSOCIATI
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF CALTEL TO MODIFY D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 30, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-09-065 BY CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA,INC.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC LIGHTWAVE, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO THE ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING DATED 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON 11/4/94 ASSIGN CMMR'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORTED
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING OF 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
REPLY; PROPOSING A SCHEDULE TO OPEN ALL MARKETS TO COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING OF 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING OF 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING DATED 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
ELECTRIC LIGHT WAVE, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED CMMR.'S 11/4/94 RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSN OF LONG DISTAN
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMER
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
PROJECT CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER AXS OF CALIFORNIA,
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR RESELLERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATION CORP.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; RE PROCESS FOR INSTITUTING FULL COMPETITION FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROCEDURAL PLAN FOR OPENING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS TO COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALL OTHER FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AG
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROCEDURAL PLAN FOR OPENING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS TO COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
LD SERVICES, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CCTV
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO PETITIONS TO MODIFY D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 AUGMENTED EXPARTE NOTICES ORIGINALLY FILED ON 11/16/94 & IN THE 11/17 DC.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO PM OF D.94-09-065 BY MCI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EXPARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EXPARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9406065 BY CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANC
E TELEPHONE COMPANIES
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 11/15/94 AT THE RENO HILTON
HOTEL, RENO, NEVADA DURING THE NARUC MEETING. LYNN MOWREY, PAC BELL, WAS ALSO
PRESENT. GUELDNER EXPLAINED IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE CPUC TO PROCEED WITH THE R
EFORM OF THE PRICE CAP MECHANISM CURRENTLY APPLIED TO PACBELL DURING 1995 FOR I
MPLEMENTATION. HE ALSO SAID THAT PACIFIC WISHES TO ACCELERATE LOCAL, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 11/15/94 AT THE RENO HILTON
HOTEL, RENO, NEVADA DURING THE NARUC MEETING. LYNN MOWREY, PAC BELL, WAS ALSO
PRESENT. GUELDNER EXPLAINED IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE CPUC TO PROCEED WITH THE R
EFORM OF THE PRICE CAP MECHANISM CURRENTLY APPLIED TO PACBELL DURING 1995 FOR I
MPLEMENTATION. HE ALSO SAID THAT PACIFIC WISHES TO ACCELERATE LOCAL, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
DENNIS MANGERS, CONTACTD CCTA'S OPERATOR/MEMBERS AND ASKED THEM TO WRITE THE
CPUC ABOUT THE DENIAL OF A HEARING TO ESTABLISH COST ALLOCATION RULES FOR DEPLO
YMENT BY PACBELL OF COAXIAL CABLE IN ITS NETWORK. ATTACHMENT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED EXPARTE NOTICE ORIGINALLY FILED ON 11/16/94 & IN 11/17/94 D.C. WILLI
AM HARRELSON, MCI, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT BY LETTER ON 11/10/94; AND SENT ANOTH
ER LETTER ON 11/11/94. THE 11/10 LETTER EXPLAINED THE CONTENTS OF THE JOINT MO
TION FOR IMPLEMENTATINO OF IEA FILED BY MCI, AT&T & CALTEL ON 7/18/94. THE 11/
11 LETTER EXPLAINED PACBELL'S CLAIMS CONCERNING LONG DISTANCE PRICE,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED - (2 NOTICES) MCI
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MCI'S AND SPRINT'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PM OF D.94-06-011 BY DRA
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
PROPOSING A PLAN FOR OPENING ALL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS TO COMPETITION BY 1
/1/97
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC LIGHTWAVE, INC.
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
L. D. SERVICES, INC.
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 11/4/94 REGARDING PROPOSED SCHEDULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONERF'S RULING OF 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON 11/4/94 ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING DATED 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CONTEL CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING: TO ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING OF 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
OPENING; RE PROCESS FOR INSTITUTING FULL COMPETITION FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
OPENING; PROPOSING A SCHEDULE TO OPEN ALL MARKETS TO COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROCEDURAL
ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROCEDURAL
ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROCEDURAL
ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROCEDURAL
ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROCEDURAL
ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROCEDURAL
ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROCEDURAL
ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SEEKING COMMENTS ON PROCEDURAL
ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
OPENING; TO ASSIGNED CMMR.'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORY PUBLI
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE ASSIGNED COMMR. RULING DATED 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER AXS OF CALIFORNIA,
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
|
|
Description:
OPENING; TO THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING DATED 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES SMSA L.P.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; TO THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING DATED 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
SACRAMENTO VALLEY L.P.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; TO THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING DATED 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
MODOC RSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
|
Description:
OPENING; TO THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING DATED 11/4/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE, INC.
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S 11/4/94 RULING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DE
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROCEDURAL PLAN FOR OPENING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS TO COMPETITI
ON
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
OF D9406065
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
ON 11/11/94, RICHARD A. BROMLEY, WROTE A LETTER TO CMMR. SHUMWAY. THE LETTER RE
FERENCED A PRESENTATION BY PACBELL AND GTEC REGARDING THE IMPACT 800 EQUAL ACCE
SS HAD ON THEIR INTRALATA 800 SERVICE MARKET; AND PACBELL AND GTEC CLAIMED THAT
THEY HAVE BEEN VIRTUALLY "DRIVEN FROM THE 800 MARKET" BY THE DEVASTATING IMPACT
OF 800 EQUAL ACCESS ON THEIR REVENUES AND WOULD SUFFER A SIMILAR FATE ...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED - (2 NOTICES) ON 11/10/94 WILLIAM HARRELSON, ATTY FOR MC
I, SENT A LETTER TO CMMR KNIGHT WHICH CONSISTED OF MCI'S OPENING STATEMENT AND
POSITION ON THE ISSUE OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS. ON 11/11/94 HARRELSON SENT A
LETTER TO CMMR. KNIGHT WHICH RESPONDED TO CLAIMS REGARDNG INCREASED PRICES FOR
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CITIZENS UTILITIES
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICES: SPRINT, TURN, PACBELL, MCI, DRA, INDEPENDENT LECS, SMALL LECS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: 2 AT&T AND 1 GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 - EX PARTE NOTICES: DRA
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR PETITION OF PACIFIC BELL FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH, AT&T, PROVIDED CMMR. KNIGHT AND HIS ADV. EVELYN LEE, A ONE-PA
GE SUMMARY OF AT&T'S POSITIONS ON THE ISSUE OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS. AT&T RE
FUTED THE FOLLOWING THREE "MYTHS" VOICED BY PACBELL IN OPPOSITION TO IEA: NAME
LY THAT EQUAL ACCESS WOULD: 1) CONSTITUTE ASYMETRIC REGULATION SINCE PACBELL IS
NOT ALLOWED IN THE INTERLATA TOLL MARKET, 2) DRIVE PACBELL FROM THE TOLL,.ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. CUCC STATED ITS POSITION THAT THE COMMISSION SHOULD MOVE FORWARD W
ITH A PROCEEDING TO IMPLEMENT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 BY ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND HIS ADV. EVELYN LEE IN SF, OTHERS PRESENT.
MCI DISCUSSED THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN THE JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING
REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS AND URGED THAT THE PR
OPOSED ORDER BE ISSUED IMMEDIATELY TO SPEED IMPLEMENTATION OF IEA FOR 4 REASONS
; 1) IEA IS ESSENTIAL TO EFFECTIVE INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION, ETC............
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. SPRINT SUPPORTS THE JOINT MOTION
AND SAID THAT MEANINGFUL COMPETITION IN INTRALATA TOLL CALLS WOULD NOT DEVELOP
IN THE RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL BUSINESS MARKET UNTIL PRESUBSCRIPTION WAS IMPLEMEN
TED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. TURN SUPPORTS EQUAL INTRALATA ACC
ESS. TURN DOES NOT BELIEVE THE LEC'S CLAIM THAT UNIVERSAL SERVICE IS AT RISK I
F EQUAL ACCESS IS APPROVED. TURN DOES NOT BELIEVE LOST MARKET SHARE DOES NOT E
QUATE TO LOST REVENUES
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. PACIFIC BELL SAID IT DID NOT OPPO
SE PRESUBSCRIPTION BUT SAID IT SHOULD BE EFFECTIVE WHEN LECS OBTAIN INTERLATA A
UTHORITY. (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. DRA SAID CUSTOMERS BENEFIT FROM M
ORE, NOT FEWER CHOICES. HEARINGS SHOULD BEGIN PROMPTLY TO HAVE TIME TO RESOLVE
ALL ISSUES. DRA DOES NOT ADVOCATE LINKING IMPLEMENTATION OF INTRALATA EQUAL A
CCESS WITH ENTRY OF THE LECS INTO THE INTERLATA MARKET
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE SMALL LECS SAID THAT THE JOIN
T MOTION WAS PROCEDURALLY INAPPROPRIATE IN THAT THE MOVING PARTIES WERE SUGGEST
ING THE CPUC ADOPT A DOCUMENT PREPARED BY INTERESTED PARTIES AS AN OII. THEY A
LSO SAID THAT THE COST OF INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE HIGH FOR SMALL COM
PANIES, (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE SMALL LECS SAID THAT THE JOIN
T MOTION WAS PROCEDURALLY INAPPROPRIATE IN THAT THE MOVING PARTIES WERE SUGGEST
ING THE CPUC ADOPT A DOCUMENT PREPARED BY INTERESTED PARTIES AS AN OII. THEY A
LSO SAID THAT THE COST OF INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE HIGH FOR SMALL COM
PANIES, (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE SMALL LECS SAID THAT THE JOIN
T MOTION WAS PROCEDURALLY INAPPROPRIATE IN THAT THE MOVING PARTIES WERE SUGGEST
ING THE CPUC ADOPT A DOCUMENT PREPARED BY INTERESTED PARTIES AS AN OII. THEY A
LSO SAID THAT THE COST OF INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE HIGH FOR SMALL COM
PANIES, (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE SMALL LECS SAID THAT THE JOIN
T MOTION WAS PROCEDURALLY INAPPROPRIATE IN THAT THE MOVING PARTIES WERE SUGGEST
ING THE CPUC ADOPT A DOCUMENT PREPARED BY INTERESTED PARTIES AS AN OII. THEY A
LSO SAID THAT THE COST OF INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE HIGH FOR SMALL COM
PANIES, (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE SMALL LECS SAID THAT THE JOIN
T MOTION WAS PROCEDURALLY INAPPROPRIATE IN THAT THE MOVING PARTIES WERE SUGGEST
ING THE CPUC ADOPT A DOCUMENT PREPARED BY INTERESTED PARTIES AS AN OII. THEY A
LSO SAID THAT THE COST OF INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE HIGH FOR SMALL COM
PANIES, (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE SMALL LECS SAID THAT THE JOIN
T MOTION WAS PROCEDURALLY INAPPROPRIATE IN THAT THE MOVING PARTIES WERE SUGGEST
ING THE CPUC ADOPT A DOCUMENT PREPARED BY INTERESTED PARTIES AS AN OII. THEY A
LSO SAID THAT THE COST OF INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE HIGH FOR SMALL COM
PANIES, (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOULUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE SMALL LECS SAID THAT THE JOIN
T MOTION WAS PROCEDURALLY INAPPROPRIATE IN THAT THE MOVING PARTIES WERE SUGGEST
ING THE CPUC ADOPT A DOCUMENT PREPARED BY INTERESTED PARTIES AS AN OII. THEY A
LSO SAID THAT THE COST OF INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE HIGH FOR SMALL COM
PANIES, (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE SMALL LECS SAID THAT THE JOIN
T MOTION WAS PROCEDURALLY INAPPROPRIATE IN THAT THE MOVING PARTIES WERE SUGGEST
ING THE CPUC ADOPT A DOCUMENT PREPARED BY INTERESTED PARTIES AS AN OII. THEY A
LSO SAID THAT THE COST OF INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WOULD BE HIGH FOR SMALL COM
PANIES, (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT AND OTHERS. THE INDEPENDENT LECS SAID THEIR G
REATEST CONCERNS WERE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, THE SCO
PE AND TERMS OF THE PROPOSED EXEMPTION FOR SMALLER LECS, AND ANY DISADVANTAGE T
HAT INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS WOULD CREATE FOR PACBELL, THE CARRIER WITH WHO THE I
NDEPENDENT LECS JOINTLY PROVIDE INTRALATA SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
11/7/94 MEETING WITH CMMR. KNIGHT AND OTHER PUC & UTILITY REPS, AT&T SAID IMPLE
MENTATION OF INTRALATA ACCESS WOULD HAVE NO EFFECT ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE. AT&T
DOES NOT BELIEVE INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS WOULD GAIN A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE BECA
USE OF INTRALATA ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON 11/7/94 A GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR. KNIGHT WAS HELD AT THE CPUC IN SF. GTEC
SAID THAT 1+ PRESUBSCRIPTION SHOULD NOT BE AUTHORIZED UNTIL GTEC IS ABLE TO PRO
VIDE INTERLATA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES. GTEC ALSO URGED CAREFUL SCHEDULING
OF ANY 1+ PRESUBSCRIPTION HEARING TO RESOLVE THE COMPLEX AND INTERRELATED ISSU
ES CONCERNING PRESUBSCRIPTION (ATTACHMENT)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ED TEXEIRA, DIRECTOR-DRA, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 11/4/94 IN S.F. OTHERS WER
E PRESENT. MR. TEXEIRA ALSO CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 11/7/94 IN SF. OTHERS
WERE ALSO PRESENT. IN BOTH CONTACTS, TEXEIRA REQUESTED THAT THE CPUC DEFER COM
MENCEMENT OF THE NEXT REVIEW OF NRF FROM 1/95 TO 1/96.
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS PACIFIC BELL'S REQUEST TO POSTPONE HEARINGS; GRANTS PACIFIC BELL'S 9/21/
94 MOTION TO REQUIRE CCTA TO FILE LATE-FILED NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS;
CCTA SHOULD FILE SUCH NOTICE BY 11/18/94
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
CMMR/SHUMWAY/PUC
|
|
Description:
WITH CONCURRENCE OF CMMR. CONLON; COMMENTS DUE 11/17/94, NO MORE THAN 10 PAGES
INCLUDING ATTACHMENTS; REPLY COMMENTS DUE 11/23/94, NO MORE THAN 5 PAGES INCLUD
ING ATTACHMENTS; 12/5/94 CMMR. REPORT; 12/21/94 COMMISSION DETERMINATION OF
PROCEDURAL PLAN; SETS PROCEDURE FOR CREATING NEW SERVICE LIST
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 BY CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9406011 BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 BY SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
RICHARD BROMLEY CONTACTED CMMR SHUMWAY & HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 10/31/94
IN SF. RANDOLPH DEUTSCH WAS PRESENT. AT&T EMPHASIZED THE NECESSITY OF MOVING
FORWARD TO MEET THE GOALS ESTABLISHED BY THE REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR FOR BRINGIN
G TELEOCMMUNICATIONS COMPETITION TO CALIFORNIA BY 1997. AT&T ALSO REQUESTED CO
MMISSION ACTION ON 1+EQUAL ACCESS AND REFERENCED THE COSTA BILL'S, ETC.........
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARY VANDERPAN CONTACTED CMR SHUMWAY & HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 10/31/94 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL INDICATED ITS OBJECTION TO THE JOINT MOTION
OF SEVERAL INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS TO IMPLEMENT INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WITHOU
T EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND VIRTUALLY NO CONSIDERATION OF THE IMPACT OF PRESUBSC
RIPTION ON THE LECS. PACBELL PROVIDED CHARTS ON 800 SERVICES AND POINTED, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 1994
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OF D9406011
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTEC CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING OF TURN, MCI, CPA OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNCIATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING BY GTEC, MCI, AND TURN
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATION CO. L.P.
|
|
Description:
ON THE APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D9409065 BY TURN
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
TO MCI'S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 BY GTE WEST COAST INC., PINNACLES TELEPHO
NE COMPANY, SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY AND VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 BY CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, CALIFORNI
A-OREGON TELEPHONE COMPANY, DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY AND WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE C
OMPANY
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 NOTICES OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DAVE DORMAN CONTACTED CMMR KNIGHT ON 10/26/94 IN SF. DICK ODGERS & DORMAN ALSO
CONTACTED CMMR ECKERT AT A RESTAURANT IN SF ON THE SAME DAY. THE SAME SUBJECT
WAS DISCUSSED IN BOTH MEETINGS. DORMAN & ODGERS STATED THAT IT WAS IMPORTANT
THAT THE 1995 REVIEW OF THE NRF NOT BE DELAYED, THAT THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR IN
HIBITS PACBELL'S ABILITY TO INVEST AND THE CUSTOMER PRICES CAN BE, ETC.........
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARY VANDERPAN CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 10/26/94 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL INDICATED ITS OBJECTION TO THE JOINT MOTION
OF SEVERAL IECS TO IMPLEMENT INTRALATA PRESUBSCRIPTION WITHOUT EVIDENTIARY HEAR
ING AND VIRTUALLY NO CONSIDERATION OF THE IMPACT ON THE LECS. PACBELL PROVIDED
DATA ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF 800 SERVICES IN CALIFORNIA AND DISPLAYED, ETC......
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: DRA/MICKIEWICZ
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION OF GTEC FOR REHEARING OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION OF GTEC FOR REHEARING OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 10/25/94, JOHN A. GUELDNER, AND DAVE DORMAN, CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER AND HIS
ADV, JOSE JIMENEZ. GUELDNER ALSO CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD
SMITH, ON THE SAME DAY. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETINGS WERE TO DISCUSS THE STATE
OF COMPETITION IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY AND THE NEED FOR REGULATORY
REFORM. GUELDNER POINTED OUT THE IMPORTANCE OF KEEPING THE 1995 NEW ...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED EX PARTE NOTICE: DRA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: MEETING ON 10/20/94 WITH CMMR KNIGHT & OTHERS. DRA STATED THAT IF
THE NEXT NRF REVIEW BEGINS IN 1995, THE COMMISSION WILL NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT DA
TA FROM THE PERIOD FOLLOWING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES TO NRF AUTHORIZED BY
D9406011 AND D9309038. IT EXPLAINED THAT RESULTS OF THE AUDIT THE COMISSION O
RDERED THE DRA TO UNDERTAKE IN D9406011 WOULD NOT BE COMPLETED BY EARLY, ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ED TEXEIRA, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 10/21/94 IN SF. OHTERS WERE PRESENT.
THE MEETING DISCUSSED DRA'S REPORT ENTITLED TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS, TECHNOL
OGY AND REGULATION RELEASED ON 8/3/94. DRA RECOMMENDS THAT NO MAJOR TELECOMMUNI
CATIONS PROCEEDINGS COMMENCE UNTIL THE OPEN NETWORK ARCHITECTURE PROCEEDING, TH
E PRESUBSCRIPTION PHASE OF IRD AND THE PETITION TO MODIFY ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: TURN
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKT/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON 10/20/94, A MEETING WAS HELD IN SF WITH CMMR KNIGHT. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
GTEC PROPOSED THAT THE COMMISSION DELAY UNTIL MID-1995 AN OII FOR THE NEXT NRF
REVIEW AND STATED THAT THIS PROPOSAL FOR A SHORT DELAY WOULD EXPEDITE THE OVERA
LL PROCESS BY ALLOWING THE COMMISSION TO HOLD WORKSHOPS OR FULL PANEL HEARINGS
IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH GUIDELINES AND IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR THE PARTICIPANTS..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & OTHERS IN SF ON 10/20/94. TURN STATED THAT IT IS NEC
ESSARY TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT TIME TO DO A MEANINGFUL AUDIT OF PACB
ELL AND GTEC AND THAT THE RESULTS ARE AVAILABLE PRIOR TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF TES
TIMONY IN THE NEXT REVIEW. TURN ADDED THAT THE COMMISSION SHOULD INVITE ALL PA
RTIES TO SUGGEST THE TOPICS FOR THE NEXT REVIEW BEFORE DECIDING THE, ETC.......
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 10/20/94, A MEETING WAS HELD IN SF WITH CMMR. KNIGHT. ATTENDEES INCLUDED RE
PS FROM THE CPUC AND UTILITY COMPANIES. MARY VANDERPAN AND DANIEL MCCARTHY FOR
PACBELL STATED THAT THE 1995 REVIEW OF NRF SHOULD NOT BE DEFERRED AND POINTED O
UT THAT WHILE PACBELL RECOGNIZED THAT THE DECISION CONCERNING THE 1992 REVIEW O
F NRF WAS JUST RECENTLY RELEASED, THE RECORD AND DATA UPON WHICH THE 1992,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
ASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ALJ CRAGG; TO PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 9/28/94, DENNIS MANAGERS, WROTE A LETTER TO CMMR. FESSLER AND CO
PIED THE SAME TO CMMRS. ECKERT, SHUMWAY, CONLON AND KNIGHT IN SF. THE LETTER
EXPRESSED THE CABLE INDUSTRY'S CONCERN OVER THE ALJ'S ORDER OF 9/20/94 WHICH
DENIED CCTA THE OPPORTUNITY TO RAISE COST-ALLOCATION ISSUES AS THEY RELATE TO
THE DEPLOYMENT OF COAXIAL TECHNOLOGY BY THE LECS IN THE FORTHCOMING ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D94-09-065 BY CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING BY MCI OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING BY ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING BY TURN OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D9409065 BY GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D94-09-065 BY CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO; CALIF-OREGON
TELEPHONE CO.; DUCOR TELEPHONE CO.; FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO.; HAPPY VALLEY;
HORNITOES; PONDEROSA; SIERRA; AND WINTERHAVEN
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-06-011 BY DRA/GRAU
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
OF D9409065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
OF D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
October 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
G-FIVE CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
TO INTERVENE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 10/10/94 PHIL QUIGLEY, CHAIRMAN AND CEO OF PACIFIC TELESIS, ADDRESSED THE 97
TH ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE US TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION HELD IN SAN DIEGO. CMMRS.
CONLON AND ECKERT WERE IN ATTENDANCE. IN HIS SPEECH, QUIGLEY DISCUSSED THE NE
W REGULATORY FRAMEWORK'S 5% PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR, AND STATED THAT IT IS EVER-INC
REASING AND UNATTAINABLE, THAT IT IS NOT THE RIGHT INCENTIVE,.......ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE REQUESTS OF COMCAST, VIACOM AND TCI FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND TO THEIR REQUE
STS TO FILE REPLIES TO PACBELL'S RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO QUASH
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 10/10/94 PHIL QUIGLEY, CHAIRMAN AND CEO OF PACIFIC TELESIS, ADDRESSED THE 97
TH ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE US TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION HELD IN SAN DIEGO. CMMRS.
CONLON AND ECKERT WERE IN ATTENDANCE. IN HIS SPEECH, QUIGLEY BRIEFLY REFERRED
TO THE TOPIC OF COST ALLOCATION FOR BROADBAND SERVICES AND SAID THAT THE ONLY
FEASIBLE WAY TO SET THE WRONG INCENTIVE RIGHT IS PURE PRICE CAPS,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND TO THE REQUEST TO FILE REPLIES TO PACBELL'
S RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO QUASH
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER OPERATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA,
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
|
Description:
TO REPLY TO PACBELL'S RESPONSE; REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; AND REPLY BRIEF IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM OF PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
COMCAST CABLEVISION OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT ITS REPLY TO THE OPPOSITION OF PACBELL RE COMCAST'S MOTION TO QUASH
SUBPOENA DECES TECUM AND REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
COMCAST CABLEVISION OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT ITS REPLY TO THE OPPOSITION OF PACBELL RE COMCAST'S MOTION TO QUASH
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
COX CABLE SAN DIEGO, INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND TO FILE REPLY TO PACBELL'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO QUASH;
REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION, INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AND TO GRANT ORAL ARGUMENT ON ITS MOTION TO QUASH
PURSUANT TO RULE 76; REPLY BRIEF ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO REQUIRE FILING OF LATE-FILED NOTICES OF EX-PARTE
COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO REQUIRE THE CCTA TO FILE LATE FILED NOTICES OF EX
PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: DRA-MICKIEWICZ
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE: DRA/MICKIEWICZ
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ED TEXEIRA, DRA, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT ON 9/28/94 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
THE MEETING DISCUSSED DRA'S REPORT ENTITLED TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS, TECHNO
LOGY AND REGULATION RELEASED ON 8/3/94. DRA RECOMMENDS THAT NO MAJOR TELECOMMU
NICATIONS PROCEEDINGS COMMENCE UNTIL THE OPEN NETWORK ARCHITECTURE PROCEEDING,
THE PRESUBSCRIPTION PHASE OF IRD AND THE PETITION TO MODIFY THE IRD,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 30, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICHIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ED TEXEIRA, DIRECTOR OF DRA, CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER ON 9/27/94 IN S.F. OTHERS
WERE PRESENT. DRA DISCUSSED ITS REPORT ENTITLED "TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS, T
ECHNOLOGY AND REGULATION" AND INFORMED THAT IT HAD MAILED THE REPORT TO THE ENT
IRE IRD SERVICE LIST TO AVOID ANY APPEARANCE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION IN TH
AT PROCEEDING,....ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: DRA/MICHIEWICZ
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 9/22/94, JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, WROTE A LETTER TO CMMRS. FESSLER, CONLON, E
CKERT, KNIGHT & SHUMWAY; AND COPIED SAME TO THEIR ADVISORS. THE LETTER RESPOND
ED TO THE 9/6/94 LETTER TO THE COISSIONERS FROM MCI, AT&T AND THE CALDTC RE;
PACBELL'S 8/22/94 RESPONSES TO THEIR JOINT MOTION. THE LETTER URGED THE COMMIS
SION TO CONSIDER TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY CHANGES IN A COMPREHENSIVE,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICHIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ED TEXEIRA, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH, ON 9/22/94 IN SF
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. DRA DISCUSSED ITS REPORT ENTITLED "TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARK
ETS, TECHNOLOGY AND REGULATION", AND INFORMED THAT IT HAD MAILED THE REPORT TO
THE ENTIRE IRD SERVICE LIST TO AVOID ANY APPEARANCE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATIO
N IN THAT PROCEEDING. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS TO QUASH BY CONTINENTAL, TIME WARNER, TCI, VIACOM, COX AND COMCAST
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO FILE A THIRD ROUND PLEADING; REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D94-08-029
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTEC CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D94-08-029
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO REQUIRE CCTA TO FILE LATE-FILED NOTICES OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
REGARDING REQUEST FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES CCTA'S 8/10/94 MOTION TO ESTABLISH A HEARING SCHEDULE; DENIES PACBELL'S
8/25/94 MOTION TO STRIKE; DENIES GTEC'S REQUEST TO STRIKE A PORTION OF GABEL'S
TESTIMONY; SETS HEARING FOR 10/31/94; SETS PROCEDURE FOR SERVICE LIST FOR THE F
IBER PREAPPROVAL PROCEEDING
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
COMCAST CABLEVISION
|
|
Description:
TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MCI'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
TCI CABLEVISION OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
TO QUASH SUBPOENA
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
VIACOM INERNATIONAL INC.
|
|
Description:
TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM OF PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
COX CABLE SAN DIEGO, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO QUASH
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER OPERATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO QUASH
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
CONTINENTAL CABLEVISION (NON-P
|
|
Description:
TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-08-029 BY CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH, WILLIAM HARRELSON AND THOMAS LONG WROTE A LETTER TO CMMRS FES
SLER, ECKERT, SHUMWAY, CONLON AND KNIGHT ON 9/6/94 IN SF, URGING THE COMMISSION
TO ESTABLISH A SEPARATE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR ADDRESSING THE ISSUE OF INTRAL
ATA EQUAL ACCESS, AND EXPRESSED BEWILDERMENT OVER PACIFIC BELL'S EFFORTS TO DEL
AY MEANINGFUL DIALOGUE ON THE ISSUE ESPECIALLY IN LIGHT OF PROPOSED STATE, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES (THE)
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE TESTIMONY OF THE CBCHA/CITY
OF LA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF PACBELL TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE TESTMONY OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE TESTIMONY OF THE CBCHA/CITY
OF LA
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
OF D.94-08-029
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE REQUEST OF TURN FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE REQUEST OF TURN FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
DANIEL RHINEHART, AT&T, COMMUNICATED BY PHONE WITH PHEOBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO
CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON 8/26/94 IN SF. RHINEHART URGED THE COMMISSION TO ESTABLISH A
SEPARATE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS A
ND TO DISCOUNT PACBELL'S EFFORTS TO HAVE THE ISSUE INCLUDED IN AN OMNIBUS LOCAL
COMPETITION PROCEEDING,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MCI'S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D9406011
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION TO MODIFY D9406011 BY DRA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
WILLIAM C. HARRELSON (MCI) CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 8/22/94 IN SF. OTHERS WE
RE PRESENT. HARRELSON EXPLAINED THAT THERE ARE IMPORTANT CONSUMER BENEFITS WHI
CH WOULD BE BROUGHT ABOUT BY IMPLEMENTATION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS, AND THAT
THE COMMISSION WOULD NOT ATTAIN ITS INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT GOALS TO OPEN ALL MA
RKETS TO TRUE COMPETITION, ENCOURAGE EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION AND,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE TESTIMONY OF CCTA, BCH/LA, TURN AND DRA
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF CCTA TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE FOR CONSIDERATON OF COST ALLOCATION I
SSUES RELATED TO COAXIAL DEPLOYMENT IN THE FIBER PRE-APPROVAL PROCEEDING
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S MOTION TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE FOR CONSIDERATON OF COST ALLOCATION
ISSUES RELATED TO COAXIAL DEPLOYMENT IN THE FIBER PRE-APPROVAL PROCEEDING
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO DRA'S PETITION TO MODIFY D.94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF CCTA TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE FOR CONSIDERATON OF COST ALLOCATION I
SSUES RELATED TO COAXIAL DEPLOYMENT IN THE FIBER PRE-APPROVAL PROCEEDING
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE JOINT MOTION OF MCI, AT&T, AND CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
TELEPHONE COMPANIES
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCEHDULE FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATEPAYER NORMA
|
|
Description:
TO THE JOINT MOTION FOR AN ORDER RE IMPLEMENTATION OF EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
ON JOINT MOTION OF MCI, AT&T AND CALTEL
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
WINERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTA
TION OF INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
DANIEL RHINEHART, AT&T, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/12/94 IN SF. OTHERS WERE P
RESENT. REHINEHART INDICATED THAT THE INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS REQUESTED IN A JO
INT MOTION, WHICH WAS FILED BY MCI, AT&T AND CALTEL, WAS TECHNICALLY FEASIBILIT
Y AND CURRENTLY AVAILABLE. HE PREDICTED THAT THE EXPENDITURES PRIMARILY WOULD
INVOLVE SOFTWARE CHANGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION'S DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON 7/20/94 DRAFT IRD DECISION AND THE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CMMR. CONLON
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON 7/20/94 DRAFT IRD DECISION AND THE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CMMR. CONLON
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON IRD DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO COMMISSION'S DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
ACCESS AMERICA TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON 7/20/94 DRAFT PHASE III DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION OF 7/21/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION IN PHASE III IRD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DE
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON COMMISSION'S DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
INTELLICAL, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON THE DRAFT DECISION AND ISSUES POSED IN COMMISSIONER CONLON'S MEMORAND
UM IN THE INTRALATA COMPETITION AND IRD PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
WILLIAM C. HARRELSON, CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT AND HER ADV. JAMES GREIG,ON 8/9/94
IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. HARRELSON EXPLAINED THAT THERE ARE IMPORTANT CONSUM
ER BENEFITS WHICH WOULD BE BROUGHT ABOUT BY IMPLEMENTATION OF INTRALATA EQUAL
ACCESS. HE NOTED THAT THE EXISTENCE OF THE TEN LARGE AND IRREGULARLY-SHAPED LAT
AS AND THE MULTIPLE NPAS WITHIN LATAS THAT MAKE CONSUMER EDUCATION ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS MOTIONS OF INTELLICAL AND CCAC FOR AUTHORITY TO LATE-FILE OPENING
COMMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE FOR CONSIDERATION OF COST ALLOCATION ISSUES RELATED TO
COAXIAL DEPLOYMENT IN THE FIBER PRE-APPROVAL PROCEEDING
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
INTELLICALL, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO LATE FILE COMMENTS ON D93-09-076; COMMENTS ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE-FILED COMMENTS; COMMENTS ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE 7/20/94 DRAFT IRD DECISION AND THE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CMMR.
CONLON
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE 7/20/94 DRAFT IRD DECISION AND THE SEPARATE STATEMENT OF CMMR.
CONLON
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
LCI INTERNATIONAL TELECOM CORP
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DE
|
|
Description:
ON THE IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OF CMMR. CONLON
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T
|
|
Description:
OPENING; TO CMMR. CONLON'S ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION RATE
DESIGN DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L.P.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE DRAFT DECISION AND THE ISSUES POSED IN CMMR. CONLON'S MEMORANDU
M IN THE INTRALATA COMPETITION AND IRD PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT CO.
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUE FORUM
|
|
Description:
UPON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
UPON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
ACCESS AMERICA TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
ON 7/20/94 DRAFT DECISION PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CMMR.'S PROPOSED DECISION IN IRD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONWS OF CALIFO
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE IRD DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT DECISION IN PHASE III IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS
|
|
Description:
ON THE DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
OPENING; RE: INTERIM OPINION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
TELPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE EMERGENCY MOTION OF THE SMALLER INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXCHANGE TELEPHONE COM
PANIES TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/CRAGG/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES THE SMALLER INDEPENDENT LECS' "EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PEND
ING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS"
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-06-011 BY DRA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO EMERGENCY MOTION OF VARIOUS INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
TO THE EMERGENCY MOTION OF VARIOUS SMALL INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR A ST
AY OF THE IRD COMMENT PERIOD
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1994
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING ACCESS TO WORKPAPERS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.94-06-011 FILED BY MCI AND TURN
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION OF TURN AND MCI FOR REHEARING OF D.94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING OF D9406011 FILED BY TURN AND MCI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRAFT DECISION BY THE COMMISSION; ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OF CMMR CONLON
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
COM/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRAFT DECISION; ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OF CMMR CONLON
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF
INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF
INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF
INTRALATA EQUAL ACCESS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D9406011
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 11, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
OF D9406011
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 24, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
REFERS CCTA'S APPEAL OF ALJ RAMSEY'S RULING OF 4/1/94 TO COMMISSION FOR DETERMI
NATION; GRANTS CCTA'S MOTION FOR STAY OF ALJ RAMSEY'S RULING UNTIL COMMISSION
ADDRESSES THE MERITS OF THE APPEAL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 6/20/94, GREGORY L. CASTLE, WROTE A LETTER TO ALJ WONG, WITH COPIES TO ELAIN
E LUSTIG, AND CARRINGTON PHILLIP. IN THE LETTER, CASTLE DESCRIBED THE PROCEDURA
L HISTORY THAT LED TO A RULING BY ALJ RAMSEY COMPELLING CCTA TO ANSWER DATE
REQUEST QUESTIONS FROM PACBELL AND CCTA'S APPEAL OF RULING. CASTLE SAID THAT
PACBELL AND CCTA HAD MET BUT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL IN RESOLUTION THEIR DISPUTES.ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, SENT A LETTER AND KEY ISSUE SSUMMARY (ATTACHED) TO CMMRS. SHUMWA
Y AND KNIGHT ON 5/20/94/ PACBELL STATED THAT THE ACR'S RECOMMENDATIONS INCREASE
BOTH ITS INCENTIVES AND RISKS, WHILE THE PROPOSED DECISION ERODES THOSE INCENTI
VES BY ADOPTING A PRODUCTIVITY MEASURE BASED PRIMARILY ON PACBELL'S ACTUAL RESU
LTS. PACBELL ALSO STATED THAT PROPOSALS BY DRA AND CARE TO TRUE-UP/REBENCH ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EXPARTE NOTICE: LATE FILED. CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 5/9/94 A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. FESSLER IN S.F. OTHER CPU
C REPS AND UTILITY REPS WERE PRESENT. CARRINGTON PHILLIP & GLEN SEMOW, REPRESE
NTING CCTA, AGREED WITH CARE THAT THERE IS INSUFFICIENT SUPPORT IN THE RECORD F
OR A PROPOSED DECISION'S ELIMINATION OF THE 50/50 SHARING MECHANISM, ELIMINATIO
N OF THE EARNINGS CEILING,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
ELAINE M. LUSTIG, WROTE A LETTER TO ALJ WONG ON 5/18/94 IN SF., WITH COPIES TO
CMMRS. FESSLER, ECKERT, SHUMWAY, CONLON, AND KNIGHT; LYNN CAREW, CHIEF ALJ; AND
PETER ARTH, JR., GENERAL COUNSEL. THE LETTER RESPONDED TO LETTERS SENT TO ALJ
WONG FROM SPENCER R. KAITZ, ATTORNEY FOR CCTA, AND GREGORY L. CASTLE, OF PACBEL
L, REGARDING CCTA'S MOTION TO STAY AND APPEAL OF ALJ RAMSEY'S RULING..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI (LATE FILED)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
GREGORY L CASTLE, SENT A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO ALJ WONG, WITH COPIES TO CMMRS.
FESSLER, SHUMWAY, ECKERT, CONLON, KNIGHT, CHIEF ALJ LYNN CAREW, AND PETER ARTH,
JR., CPUC GENERAL COUNSEL. PACBELL RESPONDED TO CCTA'S LETTER TO ALJ WONG
REGARDING CCTA'S MOTION FOR A STAY OF ALJ RAMSEY'S ORDER. PACBELL STATED THAT A
SECOND ALJ DECISION ON THIS DISCOVERY ISSUE WOULD ONLY DELAY THE ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE - DRA/MICHIEWICZ
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 5/9/94 A MEETING WAS HELD IN S.F. REGARDING NRF 1992 REVIEW PR
OCEEDING RELATIVE TO THE PROPOSED DECISION RELEASED ON 3/7/94. MARK BROWN, ATT
Y, AND TONY DITIRRO REPRESENTING MCI STATED THAT MCI BELIEVES THAT MOFIDIFICATI
ONS SHOULD BE MADE TO THE CURRENT MONITORING PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR
PACBELL IN THE AREA OF SERVICE-SPECIFIC TRACKING REPORTS BECAUSE,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE - PACIFIC BELL, SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/9/94 A MEETING WAS HELD REGARDING THE NEW NRF '92 REVIEW PROCEEDING RELATI
VE TO THE PROPOSED DECISION OF 3/7/94. CMMR. FESSLER AND OTHER CPUC STAFF ALON
G WITH MAJOR UTILITY REPS WERE PRESENT. DAN MCCARTHY, WILLIAM TAYLOR & DENNIS
EVANS REPRESENTING PACBELL MADE THE FOLLOWING POINTS: TWO KEY PRINCIPLES OF NR
F ARE THAT IT DELINKED PRICES FROM COSTS AND IT ESTABLISHED BOTH INCENTIVES,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON 5/9/94 A MEETING WAS HELD REGARDING THE NEW NRF '92 REVIEW PROCEEDING RELATI
VE TO THE PROPOSED DECISION OF 3/7/94. CMMR. FESSLER AND OTHER CPUC STAFF ALON
G WITH MAJOR UTILITY REPS WERE PRESENT. RICHARD PURKEY OF SPRINT STATED THAT P
ACBELL['S EARNINGS LEVELS DURING THE FIRST NRF PERIOD DID NOT INDICATE THAT THE
4.5% PRODUCTIVITY TARGET WAS CORRECT,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
CORRECTED NOTICE FILED UNDER A9205002,A9205004,A8705049 ON 5/11/94 AND APPEARED
ON 5/12/94 CALENDAR: ON 5/9/94, TIMOTHY MCCALLION CONTACTED CMMR SHUMWAY AND
HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD IN SF. GTEC REQUESTED THAT SCHEDULED HEARINGS REGARDI
NG GTEC'S PETITION TO REMOVE THE PRE-APPROVAL REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF
FIBEROPTIC CABLE BEYOND THE FEEDER PROCEED WITHOUT POSTPONEMENTS, ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON 5/9/94 A MEETING WAS HELD REGARDING THE NEW NRF '92 REVIEW PROCEEDING RELATI
VE TO THE PROPOSED DECISION OF 3/7/94. CMMR. FESSLER AND OTHER CPUC STAFF ALON
G WITH MAJOR UTILITY REPS WERE PRESENT. DRA'S REPRESENTATIVE EXPRESSED SUPPORT
FOR SADJUSTING THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR TO 6% AND FOR THE POSITION S PUT FORTH
BY REPRESENTATIVES OF CARE,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 11, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 11, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
ON 5/9/94, TIMOTHY MCCALLION AND FREDERICK HESSE CONTACTED CMMR SHUMWAY AND HIS
ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD IN SF. GTEC REQUESTED THAT SCHEDULED HEARINGS REFARDING
GTEC'S PETITION TO REMOVE THE PRE-APPROVAL REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF FI
BEROPTIC CABLE BEYOND THE FEEDER PROCEED WITHOUT POSTPONEMENTS. GTEC ALSO STAT
ED THAT THEY DO NOT OPPOSE HAVING THE ASSIGNED ALJ RULE ON LAW & MOTION, ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 11, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORTED
|
|
Description:
A MEETING WAS HELD ON 5/9/95 IN S.F. REGARDING NRF 1992 REVIEW RELATIVE TO PRO
POSED DECISION RELEASED 3/7/94. GTEC, REPRESENTED BY TIMOTHY MCCALLION AND F
REDERICK HESSE, STATED THAT IT REACHED A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ON THE ECONOMIC I
SSUES, BUT DID NOT COMENT ON THE ISSUES ... AND INDICATED THE ISSUES RAISED IN
THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED (ATTACHMENT),...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ALAN GARDNER, CCTA, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY AND HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 5/6
/94 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. CCTA STATED THAT IT SUPPORTS ALJ WONG'S PROP
OSAL TO CONSIDER BOTH CCTA'S AND GTEC'S PETITION S IN A PHASED CONSOLIDATED PRO
CEEDING BECAUSE IT ENSURES THAT THE DECISION ISSUED BY THE COMMISSION ON BOTH P
ETITIONS IS CONSISTENT,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
RICHARD SEVERY, MCI, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY, AND HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD, ON
5/5/94 IN SF. MCI STATED THAT THERE WAS NO LONGER A NEED FOR IMMEDIATE COMMIS
SION ACTION ON MCI'S PETITION SINCE SACRAMENTO COUNTY HAD MADE ITS SELECTION OF
BIDDERS IN A MANNER WHICH AVOIDED THE ISSUES RAISED IN THE PETITION
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF D.88-09-059
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO APPEAL BY CCTA OF ALJ RULING COMPELLING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR RESELLERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S APPEAL OF THE ALJ'S RULING COMPELLING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND
CALTEL'S JOINDER THEREOF
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
CONSOLIDATED; TO THE CCTA APPEAL OF THE ALJ'S RULING COMPELLING PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS, CCTA'S MOTION TO STAY THE ALJ'S RULING AND CAL TEL'S JOINDER IN
CCTA'S APPEAL
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
INMATE CALLING SERVICE PROVIDE
|
|
Description:
PARTIAL; TO PETITION OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS COPR. FOR MODIFICATION OF
D88-09-059
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. FOR MODIFICATION OF D.88-09-059
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER CONTACTED CMMR SHUMWAY ON 4/20/94 IN SF, MARY VANDERPAN WAS ALSO
PRESENT. ALJ GALVIN'S 4/4/94 RULING WAS PROVIDED (ATTACHED). PACBELL ASSERTED
THAT GTEC'S PETITION TO MODIFY D8910031 TO ELIMINATE THE PREAPPROVAL REQUIREME
NT FOR FIBER BEYOND THE FEEDER SHAOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED WITH CCTA'S PETITION
TO MODIGY D8910031 TO ADD PREAPPROVAL REQUIREMENT TO COAXIAL CABLE...ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
|
|
Description:
RICHARD PURKEY, TELEPHONED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV. TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON 4/22/94
IN SF. PURKEY STATED THAT IN COMMENTS TO BE FILED IN RESPONSE TO THE ASSIGNED
COMMISSIONER'S RULING (ACR) DATED 4/5/94, PARTIES INCLUDING SPRINT WOULD RECOMM
END THAT THE COMMISSION ACT AT ITS 5/4/94 CONFERENCE TO SET PACBELL INTRASTATE
RATES SUBJECT TO REFUND TO ACCOUNT FOR ANY ADJUSTMENTS ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED EX PARTE NOTICE: COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
JOINDER IN CCTA'S APPEAL OF ALJ'S RULING COMPELLING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE ASSIGNED COMMR'S RULING OF 4/5/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON THE ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING OF 4/5/94
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED CMMR. RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON ASIIGNED CMMR. RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSION'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATINS CO. L.P.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER RULING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERI
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED NOTICE; FILED 4/15/94 & CALENDARED 4/18/94: JANICE WOOD CONTACTED CM
MR CONLON ON 4/12/94 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. CWA REVIEWED ITS POSITION ON
THE PROPOSED DECISION REGARDING PRODUCTIVITY FACTORS AND ITS RESOLUTION OF THE
QUALITY SERVICE ISSUES. CWA ASKED THAT THE PROPOSED 6% PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR BE
REJECTED AND CURRENT 4.5% BE MAINTAINED OR REDUCED; AND NEXT NRF REVIEW, ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DE
|
|
Description:
ON THE ASIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY CONTACTED COMMR CONLON & HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 4/15/94 IN SF. O
THERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL PROVIDED AN OVERVIEW OF THE PRICE CAP REGULATION,
AND EXPLAINED THAT THE 6% PRODUCTIVITY "X" FACTOR IN THE PROPOSED DECISION IS F
INANCIALLY HARMFUL, COUNTER TO THE PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED BY THE COMMISSION IN
NRF, AND SUPPORTED BY INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS, & TO MEET THE 4.5% FACTOR, ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
MARK BROWN CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 4/14/94 IN SF.
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. MCI STATED THAT THE MCI SPONSORED TESTIMONY OF CARE ON RA
TE OF RETURN AND PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR TARGET ISSUES IS ACCURATE AND RECOMENDED T
HAT THE MARKET BASED RATE-OF-RETURN FOR PACBELL UNDER THE NRF FRAMWORK BE REDUC
ED TO 9.75% AND ANY ADJUSTMENTS SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY REFLECTED VIA...ETC
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FROM ALJ GALVIN TO ALJ WONG ON PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.89-10-031 RE:
FIBER TO THE FEEDER ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 NOTICES OF EX PARTE: (1) DRA (2) AUGMENTATION REQUIRED - COMMUNICATION
WORKERS OF AM ERICA DISTRICT 9
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMER
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED: JANICE WOOD CONTACTED CMMR CONLON ON 4/12/94 IN SF. OT
HERS WERE PRESENT. CWA REVIEWED ITS POSITION ON THE PROPOSED DECISION REGARDIN
G PRODUCTIVITY FACTORS AND ITS RESOLUTION OF THE QUALITY SERVICE ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ED TEXEIRA COMMUNICATED WITH CMMR CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 4/12/94
IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. DRA SUPPORTED THE ALJ FINDINGS THAT PACBELL'S PRO
DUCTIVITY FACTOR SHOULD BE INCREASED AND STATED THAT THIS WOULD OFFSET THE PROP
OSED DECISION'S PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE THE 50/50 SHARING. DRA NOTED THAT THE PR
OPOSED DECISION'S FAILURE TO REBENCH PACBELL'S MARKET-BASED RATE OF RETURN..ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
WILLIAM C. HARRELSON, ATTY FOR MCI, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONL
ON ON 4/11/94. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. MCI DESCRIBED THE BACKGROUND OF THE CO. O
F SACRAMENTO'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR SERVICE TO THE COUNTY'S CORRECTIONAL FA
CILITIES, AND MCI'S PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION OF D88-09-059, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
ON 4/11/94, THOMAS SWEET CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH IN ON
E MEETING; CMMR ECKERT AND HIS ADV. JAMES GREIG IN A SECOND MEETING; AND JOE DE
ULLOA IN A THIRD MEETING, ALL IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. GTEC STATED THAT FI
BER-TO-CURB DEPLOYMENT IS ECONOMICALLY JUSTIFIED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES NO
W, AND THE TREND INDICATES THAT FIBER COSTS WILL CONTINUE,....ETC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
TO STAY ALJ'S RULING COMPELLING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION REVIEW OF THE ALJ'S RULING COMPELLING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED-A MEETING WAS HELD IN SF ON 3/29/94 WITH CMMR ECKERT AND HER ADV. JA
MES GREIG, ALJ REED, JAMES BOOTHE, ADV. TO CMMR FESSLER, AND OTHERS. SPRINT URG
ED THE COMMISSION TO INCREASE THE NRF PRODUCTIVITY ADJUSTMENT FOR PACBELL TO AT
LEAST 6%; TO ADOPT A MARKET ROR FOR PACBELL OF BETWEEN 9.75% & 10%; TO RESET T
HE EARNINGS FLOORS AND CEILINGS AND ADJUST PACBELL'S RATES TO REFLECT...ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D8809059 OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1994
|
Filed By:
CMMR/SHUMWAY/PUC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS DUE 4/22/94, NOT TO EXCEED 20 PAGES
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
GREG CASTLE, PHONED ALJ GALVIN ON 3/31/94. PACBELL STATED THAT IT HAD BEEN GIVE
N LESS THAN 24 HOURS NOTICE OF THE REQUEST FOR A PREHEARING CONFERENCE AND
OPPOSED THE REQUEST
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GALVIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
SUSPENDS THE SCHEDULE FOR ALL ASPECTS CONCERNING GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATI
ON TO REMOVE THE PREAPPROVAL REQUIREMENT FOR FIBER EXTENSION; SETS HEARING DATE
S
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ALJ PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON THE PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ REED
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON THE PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ REED
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: AT&T AND GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: DRA/WILSON
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED EX PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/RAMSEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS PACBELL'S MOTION TO COMPEL TO THE EXTENT SET FORHT IN THIS RULING
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
SF MEETING 3/29/94 WITH CMMR ECKERT, HER ADV. JAMES GREIG, ALJ REED, AND OTHERS
. GTEC REAFFIRMED ITS COMMITMENT TO SERVICE QUALITY AND ASKED THE COMMISSION TO
REMOVE THE STTEMENT IN THE PROPOSED DECISION WHICH ALLEGES SERVICE PROBLEMS AN
D ADVOCATES SANCTIONS. GTEC ALSO STATED THAT THE COMMISISON SHOULD REAFFIRM TH
AT Z FACTORS ARE SYMMETRIC, THAT THE BURDEN OF PROOF MUST REST WITH...ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. ECKERT ON 3/29/94 IN SF. COMMISSION STAFF AND UT
ILITY REPRESENTATIVES WERE IN ATTENDANCE. MCI EXPRESSED SUPPORT FOR POSITIONS
TAKEN BY THE CARE ON THE ISSUES OF APPROPRIATE ADJUSTMENTS TO PACBELL'S TOTAL F
ACTOR PRODUCTIVITY AND MARKET-BASED RATE OF RETURN TARGETS. MCI STATED THAT IT
SUPPORTED THE PROPOSED APPROACH TO INFRASTRUCTURE,..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
SF MEETING 3/29/94 WITH CMMR ECKERT, HER ADV. JAMES GREIG, ALJ REED AND OTHERS.
AT&T STATED THAT THE PROPOSED DECISION NEEDED TO BE MODIFIED TO RECOGNIZE THAT
SHARING ABOVE RATE OF RETURN CAPS BY THE LECS WILL CONTINUE AND THAT ACCESS CH
ARGES SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN SHARING. AT&T RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION ENSU
RE THAT ANY PRODUCTIVITY ADJUSTMENTS, ADOPTED IN 1994 FOR PACBELL...ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. ECKERT AND HER ADV, JAMES GREIG, ON 3/29/94 IN SF
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. DRA SUPPORTED THE 6% PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR PROPOSED IN THE
PROPOSED DECISION; INDICATED THAT THE MARKET-BASED RATE OF RETURN SHOULD BE
RESET FROM THE CURRENT 11.50% TO 10.00%; AND OPPOSED USING THE REVENUE REDUCTIO
N TO FINANCE PACBELL'S INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
A MEETING WAS HELD WITH CMMR. ECKERT AND HER ADV, JAMES GREIG, ON 3/29/94 IN SF
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACELL EXPRESSED CONCERN WITH A 33% INCREASE IN THE X FACT
OR; THAT PABELL HAD TAKEN MEASURES TO INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY AND THAT THE NRF
HAS WORKED AS INTENDED AND DISCUSSED THE CUMULATIVE REVENUE REDUCTIONS THAT HAV
E OCCURRED UNDER NRF WITH A 4/5% X FACTOR, ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED-ALAN GARDNER CONTACTED JAMES BOOTHE, ADV. TO CMMR FESSLER ON 3/23/94
IN SF. CCTA STATED THAT THE SHARING AND EARNINGS CAP FEATURES OF THE NRF PROVI
DE PACBELL AND GTEC WITH INCENTIVES TO INVEST IN COMPETITIVE SERVICES AT RATEPA
YER EXPENSE, AND THAT THE REVENUE-NEUTRAL RATE REBALANCING PERMITTED UNDER NRF
ALSO PROVIDES INCENTIVES FOR CROSS-SUBSIDY; THAT THE RATE REBALANCING...ETC
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
OF D8809059
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR AN EMERGENCY PHC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
FOR AN EMERGENCY PHC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO SHORTEN NOTICE FOR PHC FROM 10 TO 2 DAYS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO SHORTEN NOTICE FOR PHC FROM 10 DAYS TO 2 DAYS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO SHORTEN NOTICE FOR PHC FROM 10 DAYS TO 2 DAYS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO SHORTEN NOTICE FOR PHC FROM 10 DAYS TO 2 DAYS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
FOR AN EMERGENCY PHC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 29, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
FOR AN EMERGENCY PHC
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
CCTA
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT REPLY TO PACBELL'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO SUSPEND PROCEDURAL DATES;
REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GALVIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES CCTA'S 3-15-94 MOTION TO SUSPEND PROCEDURAL DATES AND FOR SANCTIONS AGAI
NST PACBELL; GRANTS CCTA AN EXTENSION TO SUBMIT TESTIMONY RE GTEC BY 4/8/94; GR
ANTS CCTA AN EXTENSION TO SERVE ITS TESTIMONY RE PACBELL BY 5/27/94
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S MOTION TO COMPEL A RESPONSE TO DATA REQUESTS RE: CCTA'S PM OF D891003
1
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR ABUSE OF DISCOVERY PROCESS AND VIOLATION OF
RULE 1 OF COMMISSION'S RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 22, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S MOTION TO SUSPEND PROCEDURAL DATES AND EXTEND TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF
PREPARED TESTIMONY AND HEARING DATES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
THOMAS SWEET CONTACTED CMMR KNIGHT AND HIS ADV. ROERT LANE ON 3/18/94 IN SF. TI
M MCCALLION AND CAROL LAM WERE ALSO PRESENT. GTEC STATED THAT FIBER-TO-THE-CUR
B DEPLOYMENT IS ECONOMICALLY JUSTIFIED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES NOW, AND THA
T THE TREND INDICATES THAT FIBER COSTS WILL CONTINUE TO FALL RELATIVE TO THOSE
OF COPPER DEPLOYMENT OVER THE YEARS. GRAPHS ATTACHED...
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
THOMAS R. SWEET, MADE A PRESENTATION TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON THE STATE OF GTEC'S
NETWORK. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. GTEC DISCUSSED THE ECONOMICS OF FIBER-TO-THE-CURB
DELOPMENT. GTEC STATED THAT THE DEPLOYMENT IS ECONOMICALLY JUSTIFIED UNDER CERT
AIN CIRCUMSTANCES NOW, AND THAT THE TREND INDICATES THAT FIBER COSTS WILL CONTI
NUE TO FALL RELATIVE OT THOSE OF COPPER OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S MOTION TO SUSPEND PROCEDURAL DATES AND EXTEND TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF
PREPARED TESTIMONY AND HEARING DATES
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO COMPEL PACBELL TO RESPOND TO CCTA'S DATA REQUESTS REGARDING CCTA'S PETITION
TO MODIFY D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GALVIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES CCTA'S MOTION TO REPLY TO THE OPPOSITIONS OF PACBELL; GTEC AND AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/ROOD/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031 BY PACBELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, SENT A LETTER (ATTACHED) DATED 3/8/94 TO CMMRS. FESSLER, CONLON,
SHUMWAY, ECKERT, AND KNIGHT AND CHIEF ALJ CAREW. PACBELL RESPONSED TO THE 3/4/9
4 LETTER FROM DRA, CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE, TURN, UCAN, MCI, SPRINT,
AND CENTEX TO THE CMMRS. PACBELL STATES THAT IT HAS NOT ASKED THE COMMISSION IN
ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATION TO ELIMINATE THE NRF PRODUCTIVITY ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
ASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ALJ CAREW ASSIGNED TO PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D8910031 ONLY
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
FOR SANCTIONS FOR ABUSE OF DISCOVERY PROCESS AND VIOLATION OF RULE 1 OF COMMISS
ION'S RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO SUSPEND PROCEDURAL DATE AND EXTEND TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF PREPARED TESTIMONY
AND HEARING DATES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ REED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF
|
|
Description:
FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ALAN GARDNER AND GLEN SEMOW MET WITH ALJ CHIEF CAREW ON 3/1/94 IN SF. CCTA STA
TED THAT THE DEPLOYMENT OF BOTH FIBER AND COAXIAL CABLE BEYOND THE LECS' FEEDER
SYSTEM IS CURRENTLY NOT COST EFFECTIVE AND THAT IF PACBELL AND GTEC ARE PERMIT
TED TO INVEST IN THESE TECHNOLOGIES AT RATEAYER EXPENSE, THE LECS WILL BE POSIT
IONED TO PRICE VIDEO SERVICES BELOW COST AND DRIVE EXISTING CABLE...ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
JOINT PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.89-10-031 BY PACBELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF 2/23/94 EX PARTE. GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF CCTA TO ACCEPT ITS CONSOLIDATED REPLY TO THE OPPOSITIONS OF
PACIFIC BELL, GTEC AND AT&T TO CCTA'S PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. EXPARTE NOTICE - GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 24, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF 2/23/94 EX PARTE. THOMAS SWEET, MADE A FORMAL
PRESENTATION AT THE COMMISSION'S HEARING ROOM IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. GTEC
STATED THAT FIBER-TO-THE-CURB DEPLOYMENT WAS ECONOMICALLY JUSTIFIED UNDER
CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES NOW, AND THAT THE TREND INDICATED THAT FIBER COSTS WILL
CONTINUE TO FALL RELATIVE TO THOSE OF COPPER DEPLOYMENT OVER THE NEXT ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. ON 2/17/94, THOMAS R. SWEET, REPRESENTING GTEC, MADE A
FORMAL PRESENTATION AT THE COMMISSION'S HEARING ROOM IN SF. ALSO OTHERS WERE P
RESENT. GTEC STATED THAT FIBER-TO-THE-CURB DEPLOYMENT WAS ECONOMICALLY JUSTIF
IED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES NOW, AND THAT THE TREND INDICATED THAT FIBER CO
STS WILL CONTINUE TO FALL RELATIVE TO THOSE OF COPPER DEPLOYMENT..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT ITS CONSOLIDATED REPLY TO THE OPPOSITIONS OF PACBELL, GTEC AND AT&T
TO CCTA'S PETITION TO MODIFY; REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 2/14/94, JOHN GUELDNER SENT A WRITTEN PACKAGE (ATTACHED) TO CMMRS FESSLER, C
ONLON, SHUMWAY, KNIGHT AND ECKERT; JOE DEULLOA, ADV. TO CMMR FESSLER; RICHARD S
MITH, ADV. TO CMMR CONLON; PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV. TO CMMR SHUMWAY; JAMES GREIG,
ADV. TO CMMR ECKERT; ROBERT LANE, ADV. TO CMMR KNIGHT; ALJ LYNN CAREW. PART OF
THE PACKAGE DISCUSSED THE IMPLICATIONS OF PACBELL'S INFRASTRUCTURE....ETC
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
February 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
REJ. LTR. TO CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN. RE. CONSOLIDATED REPLY TO OPPOSI
TIONS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 17, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER SENT A WRITTEN PACKAGE OF MATERIAL (ATTACHED) TO CMMR FESSLER AND
HIS ADV. JOSEPH DEULLOA; CMMR CONLON AND HIS ADVISOR RICHARD SMITH; CMMR SHUMW
AY AND HIS ADV. PHEBE GREENWOOD; CMMR ECKERT AND HER ADV. JAMES GRIEG; CMMR KNI
GHT AND HIS ADV. ROBERT LANE AND ALJ CAREW. PACBELL ASSERTED THAT THE CPUC SHO
ULD ESTABLISH A "PURE" PRICE CAPS STRUCTURE TO FACILITATE ...ETC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 16, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF ALJ RULING
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
JOINT; D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOINT; D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT, INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR CLARIFICATION OF ALJ'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
FOR CLARIFICATION OF ALJ'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
FOR CLARIFICATION OF ALJ'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FOR CLARIFICATION OF ALJ'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
FOR CLARIFICATION OF ALJ'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTE
|
|
Description:
FOR CLARIFICATION OF ALJ'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1994
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
FOR CLARIFICATION OF ALJ'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
MARK BROWN, CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 2/4/94 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
BROWN EXPLAINED MCI'S SUPPORT FOR THE RATE-OF-RETURN RECOMMENDATION CONTAINED
IN THE TESTIMOY OF CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE FOR RATEPAYER EQUITY (CARE) WITNESS
TERRY MURRY, SPECIFICALLY THAT OF THE MARKET-BASED RATE-OF-RETURN APPLICABLE TO
PACIFIC BELL UNDER THE NRF FRAMEWORK BE REDUCED TO 9/75%. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 1994
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
SPENCER R. KAITZ, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT AND HIS ADV. ROBERT LANE ON 2/1/94 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. CCTA DISCUSSED ITS POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE IMPACT
OF CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR, AND LABOR SAVINGS ON
DETERMINING PACIFIC BELL'S OVER-EARNINGS, AND HOW THOSE MONIES SHOULD NOT BE
GIVEN TO PACBELL TO SUBSIDIZED COMPETITIVE NETWORK CONSTRUCTION & SERVICES.ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 2, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GALVIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS CCTA'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE PREPARED TESTIMONY BY 3/31/
94; REBUTTAL TESTIMONY SHALL BE EXTENDED TO APRIL 7, 1994
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE ALJ'S RULING DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE PETITIONS F
OR MODIFICATION OF D8910031
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF CCTA TO MODIFY D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION TO MODIFY D.89-10-031 BY CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION TO MODIFY D8910031 BY CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF CCTA TO ACCEPT ITS CONSOLIDATED REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 28, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJS/CRAGG/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
ABOLISHES PROPRIETARY TEAM PROCEDURE; ACCORDS CACD ACCESS TO UTILITY MODELS,
DATA AND OTHER INFO; PROHIBITION ON EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS REMAINS IN FORCE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 25, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT ITS CONSOLIDATED REPLY TO THE OPPOSITIONS OF PACBELL AND GTEC TO ITS
APPEAL OF THE ALJ'S RULING ON EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TESTIMONY; REPLY
ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN.
|
|
Description:
On 1/21/97, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal Affairs of
CCTA, met with Cmmr. Neeper, in SF. Also present was Fassil Fenikile, advisor
to Cmmr. Neeper. Gardner stated that the record is confusing and stale given
the technological developments since the August hearing which clearly made ISDN
a category II service.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 1994
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND DATA REQUEST
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 1994
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GALVIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF D8911031
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 11, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO COMPEL CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION TO RESPOND TO DATA REQUESTS
AND PRODUCE DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF THE CCTA TO CONSOLIDATE ITS PETITION TO MODIFY D8910031 WITH
GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION FILED 8/4/93
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF CCTA RE CCTA'S MOTION FOR TIME EXTENSION TO
FILE OPENING TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION TO CONSOLIDATE ITS
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D8910031
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
January 10, 1994
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BY THE CCTA OF THE ALJ'S RULING ON CCTA'S
MOTION FOR TIME EXTENSION TO FILE OPENING TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 31, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.89-10-031 BY THE CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASS
OCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE ALJ'S RULING ON THE CCTA MOTION FOR TIME EXTENSION
TO FILE OPENING TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
OF D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO CONSOLIDATE ITS PETITION TO MODIFY D.89-10-031 WITH GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODI
FICATION FILED 8/4/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076 AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELEASED BY THE COMMISSION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED ORDER, D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076; CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL ATTACHED UNDER SEAL
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN RESPONSE TO D.93-10-033 AND D.93-11-022
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
REPLY; UPON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
REPLY; UPON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO COMMISSION D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO., L.P
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON THE DOCUMENT ISSUED IN D.93-09-076 AND OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS IN
INTRALATA COMPETITION AND IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN, PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO ORDER ESTABLISHING REVISED SCHEDULE FOR COMMENTS BY PARTIES IN RESPON
SE TO D.93-10-033 AND CLARIFYING THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF COMMENTS SOLICITED
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON THE DOCUMENT ISSUED AS D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON THE DOCUMENT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED AS D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 21, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 12/16/93 BY LETTER. A COPY OF THAT LETTE
R (ATTACHED) WAS PROVIDED TO RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON. MOWERY STATED
PACBELL'S POSITION REGARDING RATE OF RETURN ISSUES RAISED IN THE 1992 REVIEW.
THE FOLLOWING POINTS WERE MADE: NO CHANGE SHOULD BE MADE TO THE ADOPTED 11/5%
MARKET-BASED RATE OF RETURN; ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: MCI TELECOMMUNICTIONS CORPORATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
MARK BROWN CONTACTED CMMR CONLON ON 12/10/93 IN S.F. R. SEVERY, T. DITIRRO AND
RICHARD SMITH WERE ALSO PRESENT AND WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND ATTACHED TO
THE NOTICE. DITIRRO SAID MCI SUPPORTED THE RATE-OF-RETURN RECOMMENDATIONS MADE
IN CARE'S WITNESS TERRY MURRAY, SPECIFICALLY THAT THE MARKET-BASED ROR APPLICAB
LE TO PACBELL UNDER NRF SHOULD BE REDUCED TO 9.75%
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 12/9/93 IN SF
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL MADE THE FOLLOWING POINTS: NRF IS WORKING AS INTEN
DED; A TRUE-UP OF REVENUES BASED ON AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE RATE OF RETURN WOULD
BE DOUBLE COUNTING; PACBELL'S TFP RESULTS DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ORIGINAL SELECTI
ON OF 4.5% FOR "X" WAS REASONABLE AND SHOULD NOT BE INCREASED AT THIS TIME.ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
MARK BROWN CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADV. TO FESSLER, ON 12/9/93 IN S.F WITH TO
NY DITIRRO PRESENT. MCI STATED THAT ITS TESTIMONY TO ASSURES CHGS IN NRF FORMU
LA REFLECTING EXOGENOUS CHG IN ECON. INDICATORS ARE ACCURATE AND MCI SUPPORTS
MARKET-BASED RATE OF RETURN FOR PACBELL REDUCED TO 9.75%; MODIFICATIONS NEEDED
IN SELF-SVC TRACKING REPORTS; ALSO REVERSAL OF IXC EXCLUSION IN POLICY DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY OF PACBELL CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 12/8/93 IN S.F. OTHERS WERE P
RESENT INCLUDING DENNIS EVANS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & TAYLOR FROM NERA. EVANS AN
D TAYLOR DISCUSSED PACBELL'S POSITION IN THE 1992 REVIEW OF THE NRF AND STATED
THAT NO CHANGES ARE NEEDED TO THE NRF MECHANSIM (SEE ATTACHED)...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF CCTA TO EXTEND DATE FOR PHC
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
ON THE RESCINDED IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
ON THE RESCINDED IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
PURSUANT TO ORDERING PARAGRAPH 2 OF D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE RESCINDED ORDER D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
ON D. 93-09-076 PURSUANT TO THE ORDER RESCINDING DECISION DATED 10/6/93 AND
SUBSEQUENT ORDERS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ALARM ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS
|
|
Description:
ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF
|
|
Description:
ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. (THE)
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO D.93-10-033 AND D.93-11-022
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
ON D.93-09-076; CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL ATTACHED UNDER SEAL
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
INTELLICALL, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES (THE)
|
|
Description:
ON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L.P.
|
|
Description:
OPENING;ON DOCUMENT ISSUED AS D.93-09-076; OTHER RELATED DOCUMETNS IN INTRALATA
COMPETITION AND IRD PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON RESCINED D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON RESCINDED IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTE
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076 AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
ON DOCUMENTS ISSUED AS D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF CCTA TO EXTEND DATE FOR A PHC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO EXTEND DATE FOR A PHC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOURTH CORRECTION OF A NOTICE ORIGINALLY FILED ON 9/27/93 AND APPEARING IN THE
CALENDAR OF 9/28/93, FIRST CORRECTED ON 10/5/93 APPEARED IN 10/7/93 CALENDAR, S
ECOND CORRECTION OF 11/17/93 APPEARED ON 11/22/93 AND THIRD CORRECTION FILED ON
11/22/93 APPEARED IN CALENDAR OF 11/23/93. ALL CORRECTIONS WERE GENERATED UNIQ
UELY BY THE COMPANY AND INCLUDED DOCUMENTS DETAILING PACBELL'S PROPRIETARY TEAM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
UPON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
WITHDRAWAL
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATION
|
|
Description:
OF NOTICES OF DEPOSITION AND OF DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS
|
|
|
Type:
WITHDRAWAL
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
OF NOTICES OF DEPOSITION AND OF DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS
|
|
|
Type:
WITHDRAWAL
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
OF NOTICES OF DEPOSITION AND OF DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/GALVIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
SETS PREHEARING CONFERENCE FOR 12/14/93 TO DISCUSS ISSUES RELATED TO GTEC'S PET
ITION TO MODIFY D.89-10-031; ESTABLISHES SEPARATE SVC LIST APPLICABLE SOLELY TO
GTEC'S 8/6/93 PETITION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S MOTION TO QUASH
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE REQUEST OF TURN FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
UPON D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/AMAROLI/PUC .
|
|
Description:
SHORTENS TIME FOR RESPONSES TO CMMR SHUMWAY'S, PHEBE GREENWOOD'S AND JOHN
LEUTZA'S MOTION TO QUASH NOTICE OF DEPOSITION AND/OR SUBPENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED
BY SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS; RESPONSES DUE 11/30/93
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.93-11-022
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
MURRAY, MICHAEL
|
|
Description:
ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076 AND RELATED COMMISSION DUE-PROCESS VIOLATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
RICE, MARYBETH A.
|
|
Description:
ON RESCINDED D.93-09-076 AND RELATED COMMISSION DUE-PROCESS VIOLATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENDED NOTICE OF 9/27/93 EX PARTE. GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
CORRECTED NOTICE OF AN EXPARTE ORIGINALLY FILED 9/27/93 & APPEARED IN CALENDAR
9/28/93; IT WAS THEN CORRECTED ON 10/5/93 AND CORRECTION APPEARED 10/7/93; 2ND
CORRECTION MADE 11/17/93 AND THAT APPEARED 11/19/93. THIS CORRECTS 11/17/93
NOTICE AND IS INITIATED PURELY BY PACBELL; THIS CORRECTED NOTICE PROVIDES HAND
WRITTEN LIST OF G. OLIVER W/RATIONALE THEREFOR AND OTHER WRITTEN ITEMS INCLUDED
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CORP.
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.93-11-022 BY SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
COMMISSIONER SHUMWAY
|
|
Description:
WITH GREENWOOD AND LEUTZA TO QUASH NOTICES OF DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS ISSUED BY SH
ARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., TURN, AND THE CITY OF LOS ANGELS; AND RE
QUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO THIS MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
PHEBE GREENWOOD
|
|
Description:
W/CMMR SHUMWAY AND LEUTZA TO QUASH NOTICES OF DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS ISSUED BY SH
ARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., TURN, AND THE CITY OF LOS ANGELS; AND RE
QUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO THIS MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
JACK LEUTZA
|
|
Description:
W/CMR SHUMWAY & GREENWOOD TO QUASH NOTICES OF DEPOSITION SUBPOENAS ISSUED BY SH
ARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., TURN, AND THE CITY OF LOS ANGELS; AND RE
QUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO THIS MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
AUGMENDED NOTICE OF 9/27/93 EX PARTE. GARY LAW, COMMUNICATED WITH PHEBE GREENWO
OD, ADV. TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 9/16/93, IN SF. GTEC CLARIFIED HOW ITS PRICE CAP
FILING WOULD AFFECT THE IRD RATE DESIGN. GTEC STATED THAT IT HAS PETITIONED
THE COMMISSION TO IMPLEMENT THE 1994 PRICE CAP FILING VIA GTEC'S A-38(A) SURCHA
RGE TARIFF. ON 9/20/93 GTEC PROVIDED A COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
THIS IS A 2ND CORRECTED EX PARTE OF 9/27/93: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/AMAROLI/PUC
|
|
Description:
SHORTENS TIME FOR RESPONSE TO PACBELL'S MOTION TO QUASH NOTICE OF DEPOSITION AN
D/OR SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED BY SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS;
RESPONSES DUE 11/30/93
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY,
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO THE EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.93-11-022 BY
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST OF PACBELL FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO RESPOND TO PACBELL'S MOTION
TO QUASH
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO QUASH NOTICE OF DEPOSITION AND/OR SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED BY SHARED COMM
UNICATIONS SYSTEM, INC., TURN, AND CITY OF LOS ANGELES; REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SH
ORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO PACIFIC'S MOTION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.93-11-022 BY SHARED TELECOMMUNICATI
ONS SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.93-11-022 BY SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
INC.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.93-11-022 BY SHARED TELECOMMUNICATI
ONS SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THIS IS A 2ND CORRECTED EX PARTE OF 9/27/93. ON APPROXIMATELY 9/10/93, G.L. OLI
VER, PROVIDED TO PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, A HANDWRITTEN CHECK LIS
T OF IRD ISSUES NOT YET ADDRESSED WHICH OLIVER PREPARED FOR HIS OWN USE. THE
CHECKLIST INCLUDES ISSUES SUCH AS SCOPE OF COMPETITION; TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
COMPETITION; ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D.93-11-022
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO THE APPLICATION OF REHEARING OF D.93-11-022 OF SHARED TELECOMMUNICATI ONS
SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FROM ALJS AMAROLI, LEE AND REED TO ALJS AMAROLI, CRAGG, WEISMEHL AND REED; ALJ
GALVIN TO PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.89-10-031 ONLY
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 12, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST OF TURN FOR AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY APPLICATION OF REHEARING OF D.93-11-022 BY SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO SHORTEN TIME FOR RESPONSE TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF
D.93-11-022
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
November 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; OF D.93-11-022
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TWO EX PARTE NOTICES: GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION CONTACTED CMMR SHUMWAY AND EMPHASIZED THAT GTEC'S REQUESTED
MODIFICATION WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH PUBLIC POLICY TO IMPROVE THE IN
FRASTRUCTURE, WITH FIBER BECOMING THE TECHNOLOGY OF CHOICE FOR BOTH LECS AND
COMPETITIVE COMPANIES AND NRF HAS ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS TO PREVENT CROSS SUBSIDIZ
ATION. GTEC NOTED ITS RATE OF CHG IS INDEPENDENT OF LEVEL OF INVESTMENT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADVISOR AND EMPHASIZED THAT GTEC'S
REQUESTED MODIFICATION WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH PUBLIC POLICY TO IMPROVE THE IN
FRASTRUCTURE, WITH FIBER BECOMING THE TECHNOLOGY OF CHOICE FOR BOTH LECS AND
COMPETITIVE COMPANIES AND NRF HAS ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS TO PREVENT CROSS SUBSIDIZ
ATION. SUMMARY OF PRESENTATION AND NOTICE RE VENTURA CO. CABLEVISION ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE RESPONSE TO DRA'S EMERGENCY PETITION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033; RESP
ONSE ATTACHED.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE RESPONSE TO DRA'S EMERGENCY PETITION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033; RESP
ONSE ATTACHED.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
TO EMERGENCY PETITIONS OF DRA AND MCI
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF DRA TO MODIFY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF DRA TO MODIFY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO (THE)
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
TO DRA PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO DRA PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTE
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF DRA'S EMERGENCY PETITION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033 AND IN OPPOSITION
TO MCI'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO (THE)
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
TO DRA PETITIONFOR MODIFICATION OF D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO DRA PETITIONFOR MODIFICATION OF D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO DRA PETITIONFOR MODIFICATION OF D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. (THE)
|
|
Description:
TO DRA PETITIONFOR MODIFICATION OF D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO DRA PETITIONFOR MODIFICATION OF D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO THE EMERGENCY PETITION OF DRA AND THE EMERGENCY MOTION OF MCI
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
TO EMERGENCY PETITION OF DRA TO MODIFY D93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO DRA'S EMEGENCY PETITION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033, RESCINDING D.93-09-076 AND TO
MCI'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
TO DRA'S EMERGENCY PETITION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF THE EMERGENCY PETITION OF DRA TO MODIFY D.93-10-033 AND IN OPPOSI
TION TO THE EMERGENCY MOTION OF MCI
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO MCI'S EMERGENCY PETITION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO MCI'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO DRA'S EMERGENCY PETITION TO MODIFY D93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,
|
|
Description:
AND COMMENTS ON EMERGENCY PETITION OF DRA AND MOTION OF MCI
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON 10/25/93 TIMOTHY MCCALLION MET WITH CMMR CONLON IN S.F. REGARDING THE PETITI
ON OF GTEC TO MODIFY D.89-10-031. WRITTEN MATERIALS WERE USED AND ARE ATTACHED
TO THE NOTICE. THE REQUESTED MODIFICATION'S CONSISTENCY WITH PUBLIC POLICY TO
IMPROVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACT THAT FIBER IS BECOMING THE TECHNOLOGY OF CH
OICE FOR LECS, ETC WAS EMPHASIZED; GTEC OPPOSES UBIQUITOUS ISDN BEING MANDATED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; PM OF D.93-10-033 BY MCI
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
TO DRA'S EMERGENCY PETITION TO MODIFY D.93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L.P.
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO THE EMERGENCY PETITION OF DRA TO MODIFY D.93-10-033, ORDER
RESCINDING D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY PM OF D.93-10-033, ORDER RESCINDING D.93-09-076 BY DRA STAFF WILSON,
THAYER AND MICKIEWICZ
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/AMAROLI/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
PACBELL EMPLOYEES OLIVER AND HOWARD ARE RELIEVED OF OBLIGATIONS SET FORTH IN
NONDISCLOSURE CERTIFICATES; THESE EMPLOYEES SHALL REFRAIN FROM ANY PROPRIETARY
TEAM ACTIVITIES AND EX PARTE CONTACTS; RESPONSE TO DRA'S PETITION TO MODIFY &
MCI'S PETITION TO MODIFY ARE DUE 10/28/93
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION OF EMERGENCY PETITION OF DRA TO MODIFY D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION TO STRIKE FILED BY GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; FOR AN ORDER LIFTING THE EX PARTE BAN SOLELY FOR THE 10/21/93 LEGISL
ATIVE HEARING
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; OF D.93-10-033 WITH REGARD TO THE PROCEDURE FOR FILING COMMENTS ON
D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR RESPONSE TO DRA'S PETITION TO MODIFY D93-10-033
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/THAYER/MICKIEWICZ/
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; D.93-10-033, ORDER RESCINDING D.93-09-076
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY; TO RELIEVE CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE PROPRIETARY TEAM FROM THE RESTRICT
IONS IMPOSED BY THE NONDISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: GTEC LATE FILED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: (2) CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/FESSLER/PUC
|
|
Description:
OF PRESIDENT; DENIES 9/27/93 MOTIONS OF PACBELL AND GTEC FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS;
THE COMMISSION WILL UNSEAL DOCUMENTS APPENDED TO THESE MOTIONS AND PLACE THEM
IN THE FORMAL FILE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC; THE TIER II AND TIER III DOCUMENTS
SHALL BE MADE AVAILABE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION BY CACD IN ROOM 3206
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 9/16/93, GARY LAW FOR GTEC SPOKE WITH RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CM
MR. CONLON IN S.F. LAW GAVE SMITH A COPY OF A BILL IMPACT ANALYSIS (ATTACHED)
ON 9/17/93. LAW DIDN'T BELIEVE THIS WAS AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION BUT GTEC FILE
D THIS NOTICE PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FROM THE COMMISSION'S LEGAL DIVISION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 12, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON 10/6/93, SPENCER R. KAITZ FOR CCTA, MET WITH CMMR. SHUMWAY IN S.F. OTHERS W
ERE PRESENT. ON 10/8/93, KAITZ, GARDNER AND PHILLIPS OF CCTA MET WITH CMMR. FE
SSLER. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. IN BOTH MEETINGS CCTA DISCUSSED THEIR POSITION WI
TH RESPECT TO GTEC'S PETITION TO MODIFY THE NRF ORDER OF 10/31/93..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
CORRECTED NOTICE OF 9/28/93 EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE OPENING BRIEF OF KENNETH BATES, JR.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
CORRECTED NOTICE OF 9/28/93 EX PARTE. THE CORRECTIONS CHANGE TWO DATES ON WHICH
J. LECHTENBERG CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, AND ADDS THE
NAME OF ONE OF THE PACIFIC BELL MEMEBERS OF THE PROPRIETARY TEAM
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND A
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. LP
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
REPLY;
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS BY PACBELL AND GTEC FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/WILSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF PACBELL AND GTEC PROTECTIVE ORDER UDNER GO 66-C
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSO.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93 AND OPPOSITION OF CPA TO MOTIONS
OF PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO. (THE)
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO., INC.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/ALJ
|
|
Description:
TO THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
METRO FIBER SYSTEMS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93 AND OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS OF
PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR PROTECTI VE ORDERS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING OF 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
INTELLICALL, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING DATED 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING DATED 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
October 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING DATED 9/27/93
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
G.L. OLIVER OF PACIFIC BELL CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 9/30/93 BY LETTER. WRIT
TEN MATERIAL USED AND ATTACHED. THE LETTER DESCRIBED OLIVER'S PERSONAL FEELING
S ABOUT THE ALLEGATIONS THAT HE ACTED IMPROPERLY IN THE IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: GTEC AUGMENTED NOTICE ORIGINALL FILED 9/27/93 AND ON 9/28/93
D.C.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: TURN
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: GTEC - 3
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: PACIFIC BELL AND GTEC-AUGMENTATION REQUIRED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ALAN GARDNER OF CCTA CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 9/23/93 IN S.F. OTHERS WERE PRE
SENT. THE CCTA REPS DISCUSSED THE CABLE INDUSTRY POSITION ON GTEC AND PACBELL'
S PETITION TO MODIFY THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ORDER OF 10/31/89 TO ELIMINA
TE THE PREAPPROVAL REQUIREMETN FOR THE DEPLOYMENT OF FIBER.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
GARY LAW FOR GTEC CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 9/16/93 IN S.F. LAW ALSO CONTACTED
PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV. TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON THE SAME DATE. WRITTEN MATERIAL USE
D AND AND HAS BEN FILED UNDER SEAL BECAUSE GTEC BELIEVES IT IS COVERED BY A PRO
TECTIVE ORDER AUGMENTED NOTICE ORIGINALLY FILED ON 9/27 AND APPEARED IN 9/28
D.C.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
BATES, KENNETH JR.
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
CMMR/SHUMWAY/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICES PLACEMENT OF AN ORDER STAYING D.93-09-076 ON THE COMMISSION'S 10/6/93
AGENDA TO GIVE THE COMMISSION OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS
CONCERNS; PARTIES WISHING TO COMMENT ON THIS ISSUES SHALL FILE COMMENTS WITH
THE DOCKET OFFICE ON OR BEFORE 10/4/93
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER UNDER GO 66-C
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER UNDER GO 66-C
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
J. LECHTENBERG, W. HAMPEL, & J. OLIVER-STAFF OF PACBELL, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENW
OOD, ADV. TO CMMR. SHUMWAY AND JAMES GRIEG, ADV. TO CMMR. ECKERT ON VARIOUS DAT
ES ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS AT THE CPUC IN S.F. AND BY PHONE AND FAX BETWEEN 7/13 AN
D 9/17/93. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS BEING FILED UNDER SEAL BECAUSE PAC
BELL BELIEVES IT IS COVERED BY A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. AN UNNAMED STAFF MEMBER OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. CONTACT
ED AN UNNAMED DECISION MAKER ON 9/16/93. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS BEIN
G FILED UNDER SEAL BECAUSE GTEC BELIEVES IT IS COVERED BY A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: MCI, INDEPENDENT LECS, AND TURN- AUGMENTED NOTICE FILED ON
9/22/93 AND IN 9/23/93 D.C.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
FREDERICK HESS OF GTEC, IN 3 SEPARATE MEETINGS ON 9/22/93, CONTACTED JOSEPH DEU
LLOA, ADV. TO CMMR. FESSLER; RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON; AND JAMES GRI
EG, ADV. TO CMMR. ECKERT; ALL IN S.F. HESSE DISCUSSED GTEC'S PETITION TO MODIF
Y D. 89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TOM LONG FOR TURN CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 9/21/93 IN S.F. RICHARD SMITH, ADV
. TO CMMR. CONLON WAS ALSO PRESENT. LONG SAID TURN BELIEVED THAT MOST CALIFORN
IA RATEPAYERS WOULD BE HARMED BY THE RATES ADOPTED IN THE IRD DECISION BECAUSE
2/3 OF CUSTOMERS HAD LESS THAN AVERAGE TOLL USAGE AND THAT MEDIAN BILL IMPACTS
WERE MUCH MORE REFLECTIVE OF THE IMPACT ON THE TYPICAL CUSTOMER
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALL OTHER FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AG
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED NOTICE FILED ON 9/22/93 AND APPEARED IN THE 9/23/93 CALENDAR. AUDIRI
E KRAUSE, OF TURN CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADV. OF CMMR. FESSLER ON 9/17/93.
WRITTEN MATERIAL USED AND ATTACHED. KRAUSE EXPRESSED TURN'S DISAPPOINTMENT WIT
H CMMR FESSLER'S FAVORABLE VOTE ON IRD
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
INDEPENDENT LEC
|
|
Description:
MARK SCHREIBER COUNSEL FOR INDEPENDENT LECS CONTACTED CHIEF ALJ LYNN CAREW ON 9
/22/93 IN S.F. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. SCHREIBER DISCUSSED THE SCOPE AND TIMING
OF REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY LECS IN 1994 AS THEY RELATED TO THE FINA
L IRD DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
WILLIAM HARRELSON, COUNSEL FOR MCI, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONL
ON AND ALJ LEE ON 9/16/93 AND 9/13/93, RESPECTIVELY. WRITTEN MATERIAL USED AND
ATTACHED. THE LETTER TO SMITH DISCUSSED UNBUNDLING AND DEFINITIONS OF LONG-RU
N INCREMENTAL COST. THE LETTER TO LEE DISCUSSED CALTEL'S POSITION ON REDUCTION
OF ACCESS CHARGES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 NOTICES OF EXPARTE: TURN
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE: PACIFIC TELESIS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQ.; AUDRIE KRAUSE, CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA, ADV TO CMMR. FESSLER
ON 9/17/93. KRAUSE EXPRESSED HER DISAPPOINTMENT IN CMMR. FESSLER'S VOTE IN FAVO
R OF THE DECISION AND PROVIDED DEULLOA WITH A COPY OF THE STATEMENT TURN ISSUED
TO NEWS REPORTERS IN RESPONSE TO THE COMMISSION'S VOTE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
AUDRIE KRAUSE, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 9/17/93 IN SF. KRAUSE EXPRESSED HER
DISAPPOINTMENT IN CMMR. CONLON'S VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE DECISION AND INFORMED HIM
THAT DESPITE STATEMENTS TO THE CONTRARY IN THE COMMISSION'S PRESS RELEASE, A
MAJORITY OF CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CUSTOMERS WOULD SEE THEIR OVERALL BILL
INCREASE AS A RESULT OF THE COMMISSION'S ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
EXPARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE: CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC TELESIS
|
|
Description:
RICHARD ODGERS, PACIFIC TELESIS, CONTACTED CMMR CONLON ON 9/16 BY TELEPHONE. O
DGERS URGED A 9/17/93 ADOPTION OF IRD.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO THE COMMENTS OF PACBELL ON THE PETITION OF GTEC TO MODIFY D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
CARRINGTON PHILLIP, CCTA, CONTACTED SMITH ADV TO CMMR CONLON ON 9/20 IN SF. PH
ILLIP ALSO CONTACTED DEULLOA ADV TO CMMR FESSLER IN A SEPARATE MEETING ON 9/15/
93. PHILLIP SAID THAT GTEC'S PETITION WAS PRECEDURALLY DEFECTIVE AND SHOULD HA
VE BEEN FILED AS AN APPLICATION.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
MCCALLION CONTACTED SMITH ADV TO CMMR CONLON ON 9/14/93 IN SF. HE ALSO CONTACT
ED GRIEG, ADV TO CMMR ECKERT IN A SEPARATE MEETING ON THE SAME DATE. HE SAID
GTEC SUPPORTS ELIMINATION OF THE CCL AND DISCUSSED ELASTICITY OF DEMAND. LATE
FILED.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
GTEC'S MECCALLION CONTACTED SMITH ADV TO CMMR CONLON IN 9/14/93 IN SF. HE ALSO
CONTACTED GRIEG ADV TO CMMR ECKERT IN A SEPARATE MEETING ON THE SAME DATE. HE
SAID THAT GTEC SUPPORTED ELIMINATION OF THE CCL AND DISCUSSED ELASTICITY OF DEM
AND. LATE FILED.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
MCCALLION OF GTEC CONTACTED COMMR CONLON ON 9/16 BY TELEPHONE. MCCALLION DISCU
SSED THE COST OF PROVIDING ALL OF GTEC'S CUSTOMERS CALL WAITING AND THREE WAY C
ALLING AS PART OF THE BASIC SERVICE.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED; NOTICE OF EXPARTE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE PROTEST OF CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
September 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTIONS OF PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REJ. LTR. TO KENNETH BATES, JR. RE: OPENING BRIEF
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, PACIFIC BELL, CONTACTED CMMR CONLON ON 9/14 IN SF. HE ALSO CONT
ACTED GREIG ADV TO CMMR ECKERT AND DEULLOA ADV TO CMMR FESSLER IN SEPARATE MEET
INGS ON THE SAME DATE. WRITTEN MATERIAL USED AND ATTACHED. GUELDNER REQUESTED
A DECISION ON THE IRD BY 9/17/93.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: DRA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: 3 PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
WILLIAM HARRELSON, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON ON 9/10/93 IN
SF. HARRELSON SAID THAT MCI GENERALLY SUPPORTED THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S
RULING EXCEPT FOR ITS PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE LEC'S PROPOSED PRICE FLOORS (LATE
FILED)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 15, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
HELEN MICKIEWICZ CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADV TO CMMR. FESSLER ON 9/10/93 BY
PHONE. MICKIEWICZ DISCUSSED DRA'S RECOMMENDATION FOR A TEMPORARY AND TRANSITION
AL ALL END-USER SURCHARGE
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDER OF PACBELL CONTACTED JAMES GRIEG, ADV. TO CMMR ECKERT ON 9/9/93 IN
SF. ALSO OTHERS PRESENT. PACBELL REPS DISCUSSED REVENUE NEUTRALITY CHANGES.
GUELDER SENT A LETTER, WITH WRITTEN MATERIAL ATTACHED, TO CMMRS. FESSLER, ECKER
T, SHUMWAY & CONLON ON 9/9/93. IT DETAILED PACBELL'S PREFERENCE FOR THE ASSIGN
ED CMMRS. RULING WHICH WAS PRESENTED AT THE 8/30/93 EN BANC HEARING.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
BRAD WICKES FOR PACBELL, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV. TO SMMR SHUMWAY ON
9/10/93 BY LETTER. WRITTEN MATERIAL USED AND ATTACHED. THE LETTER DESCRIBED C
HANGES TO THE PROPOSED DECISION REFLECTING PACBELL'S POSITION THAT MONOPOLOY BU
ILDING BLOCKS USED BY COMPETITORS BE IMPUTED IN PACBELL'S PRICE FLOORS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/MICKIEWICZ/THAYER/P
|
|
Description:
TO THE IRD IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP REPORT BY THE CACD
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: (2) CPA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION AND COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
MARTIN MATTES, COUNSEL FOR CPA CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV. TO CMMR. SHUMWAY
ON 9/10/93 BY PHONE. WRITTEN MATERIAL USED AND ATTACHED. MATTES DISCUSSED TH
E COSTS OF PROVIDING MEASURED BUSINESS SERVICE AND SEMI-PUBLIC SERVICE. HE ALS
O DISCUSSED THE TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY TO CONNECT A COPT TO A WATS LINE.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
CAPLIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATI
|
|
Description:
THOMAS KEANE OF CPA CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON ON 9/9/93 IN
S.F. JULIA RUSSON AND MARTIN MATTES FOR CPA WERE ALSO PRESENT. THE CPA REPS A
LSO CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV. TO CMMR. SHUMWAY IN A SEPARATE MEETING ON T
HE SAME DATE. THE CPA REPS DISCUSSED THEIR CONCERNS ABOUT THE PRICING OF CERTA
IN CATEGORY 1 MONOPOLY SERVICES THAT COPT PROVIDERS PURCHASE FROM LECS...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIA
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH FABER, COUNSEL FOR BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION AND FOR THE COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES, CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND HIS ADVISOR, RICHARD SMITH, ON 9/7/93
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE; MR. FABER DISCUSSED
MOVING ELASTICITY ESTIMATES UP FROM -.5 TO -.723, MEASUREMENTS OF TOLL ELASTICI
TY, FINANCIAL EFFECTS OF ADOPTION OF VARIOUS TOLL ELASTICITY ESTIMATES, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE COMPANIES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: EVANS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
POST HEARING;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
OPENING;
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
MICHAEL MORRIS, CONTACTED JAMES CREIG, ADV. TO CMMR. ECKERT ON 9/3/93 IN SF.
MORRIS EXPRESSED TCG'S SUPPORT FOR THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING ANS STRES
SED SUPPORT FOR AUTHORIZATION OF CENTREX COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
THOMAS MACBRIDE, COUNSEL FOR CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE
COMPANIES, CONTACTED CMMR CONLON ON 09/08/93 IN S.F., CA. ALSO PRESENT WAS RI
CHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR CONLON. MACBRIDE SAID THAT THE PROPOSAL TO REQUIR
E NONDOMINANT INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS TO FLOW THROUGH ANY REDUCTION IN ACCESS CH
ARGES TO THEIR USERS WAS SERIOUSLY FLAWED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
D.C. WILLIAMS, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 9/3/93 BY LETTER. WRITTEN MATERIAL ATT
ACHED. THE LETTER PROVIDED INFORMATION ON BUSINESS AND RESIDENCE CUSTOMER
AVERAGE BILLING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE AND THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EXPARTE NOTICE: INTELLICALL,
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON GTEC'S PETITION TO MODIFY D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJS/AMAROLI/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
CACD'S WORKSHOP AGENDA AND REPORT WILL BE DEEMED A LATE-FILED EXHIBIT, EXHIBIT
NUMBER 939; OBJECTIONS TO THE CONTENTS OF THE EXHIBIT MUST BE FILED WITH THE
DOCKET OFFICE WITH A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY 9/14/93
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
INTELLICALL, INC.
|
|
Description:
REID PEARSON OF INTELLICALL, INC. CONTACTED CMMR CONLON ON 9/1/93 IN SF. ALSO
OTHERS PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. THE INTELLI- CALL
REPS DISCUSSED THEIR CONCERN ABOUT THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED DECISION TH AT
WOULD PROHIBIT STATE AND FORWARD COPT PROVIDERS FROM COMPLETING 0-PLUS 7 DIG ITS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
MICHAEL MORRIS OF TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVI
SOR TO CMMR SHUMWAY, BY TELEPHONE 9/3/93. MR. MORRIS EXPRESSED TCG'S SUPPORT
FOR THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND STRESSED SUPPORT FOR THE
AUTHORIZATION OF CENTREX COMPETITION.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH FABER, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 9/1/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
FABER DISCUSSED THE NEED TO ADJUST THE ELASTICITY ESTIMATE FOR INTRALATA TOLL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH FABER, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 9/1/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
FABER DISCUSSED THE NEED TO ADJUST THE ELASTICITY ESTIMATE FOR INTRALATA TOLL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF GTEC FOR MODIFICATION OF D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
September 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REJECTION LETTER SENT TO AT&T RE: THEIR SUPPORT OF GTEC'S PETITION FOR
MODIFICATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CP NATIONAL; EVANS TELEPHONE CO; GTE WEST COAST INC.; KERMAN T
ELEPHONE CO; PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO; SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO; & TUOLUMNE TELEPHON
E CO.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
J.A. GUELDNER OF PACBELL SENT A LETTER TO CMMR ECKERT WITH COPIES TO CMMRS. FES
SLER, CONLON, KNIGHT, AND SHUMWAY ON 8/30/93. THE LETTER REFERENCED AN ATTACHM
ENT WHICH WAS LEFT OFF AND SENT 8/31/93. PACBELL STATED THAT THE AMOUNT OF TOL
L STIMULATION BEING PREDICTED FOR REVENUE REBALANCING IS UNREALISTIC..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
JEFFREY BECK, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 8/27/93 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. BECK AND WILLIAMS EXPRESSED THE CONCERNS OF THESE SMAL
L LECS WIHT THE IRD DECISION, INCLUDING THE NEED FOR THE DECISION TO RECOGNIZE
THE MAGNITUDE OF RATE AND REVENUE CHANGES AND THE NEED TO PROVIDE CALIFORNIA HI
GH COST FUNDS TO OFFSET REVENUE LOSSES. THEY ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED.., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
JEFFREY BECK, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 8/27/93 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. BECK AND WILLIAMS EXPRESSED THE CONCERNS OF THESE SMAL
L LECS WIHT THE IRD DECISION, INCLUDING THE NEED FOR THE DECISION TO RECOGNIZE
THE MAGNITUDE OF RATE AND REVENUE CHANGES AND THE NEED TO PROVIDE CALIFORNIA HI
GH COST FUNDS TO OFFSET REVENUE LOSSES. THEY ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED.., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
JEFFREY BECK, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 8/27/93 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. BECK AND WILLIAMS EXPRESSED THE CONCERNS OF THESE SMAL
L LECS WIHT THE IRD DECISION, INCLUDING THE NEED FOR THE DECISION TO RECOGNIZE
THE MAGNITUDE OF RATE AND REVENUE CHANGES AND THE NEED TO PROVIDE CALIFORNIA HI
GH COST FUNDS TO OFFSET REVENUE LOSSES. THEY ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED.., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
JEFFREY BECK, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 8/27/93 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. BECK AND WILLIAMS EXPRESSED THE CONCERNS OF THESE SMAL
L LECS WIHT THE IRD DECISION, INCLUDING THE NEED FOR THE DECISION TO RECOGNIZE
THE MAGNITUDE OF RATE AND REVENUE CHANGES AND THE NEED TO PROVIDE CALIFORNIA HI
GH COST FUNDS TO OFFSET REVENUE LOSSES. THEY ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED.., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
JEFFREY BECK, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 8/27/93 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. BECK AND WILLIAMS EXPRESSED THE CONCERNS OF THESE SMAL
L LECS WIHT THE IRD DECISION, INCLUDING THE NEED FOR THE DECISION TO RECOGNIZE
THE MAGNITUDE OF RATE AND REVENUE CHANGES AND THE NEED TO PROVIDE CALIFORNIA HI
GH COST FUNDS TO OFFSET REVENUE LOSSES. THEY ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED.., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
JEFFREY BECK, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 8/27/93 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. BECK AND WILLIAMS EXPRESSED THE CONCERNS OF THESE SMAL
L LECS WIHT THE IRD DECISION, INCLUDING THE NEED FOR THE DECISION TO RECOGNIZE
THE MAGNITUDE OF RATE AND REVENUE CHANGES AND THE NEED TO PROVIDE CALIFORNIA HI
GH COST FUNDS TO OFFSET REVENUE LOSSES. THEY ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED.., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
JEFFREY BECK, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 8/27/93 IN
SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. BECK AND WILLIAMS EXPRESSED THE CONCERNS OF THESE SMAL
L LECS WIHT THE IRD DECISION, INCLUDING THE NEED FOR THE DECISION TO RECOGNIZE
THE MAGNITUDE OF RATE AND REVENUE CHANGES AND THE NEED TO PROVIDE CALIFORNIA HI
GH COST FUNDS TO OFFSET REVENUE LOSSES. THEY ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED.., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI (2) LATE FILED NOTICES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV TO CMMR. CONLON AND JAMES CREIG, ADV
TO CMMR. ECKERT, ON 8/25/93 IN SF. DENNIS EVANS, OF PACBELL WAS PRESENT. WRITTE
N MATERIAL IS ATTACHED. PACBELL MADE THE FOLLOWING POINTS: A "TRUE-UP IS A RETU
RN TO RATE OF RETURN REGULATION; A TRUE-UP WOULD RESULT IN DOUBLE COUNTING; THE
COMMISSION SET AN ROR REVIEW TRIGGER MECHANISM OF A 250 BASIC POINTS.., ECT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY MET WITH RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON ON 8/25/93 IN SF.
JERRY OLIVER OF PACBELL WAS PRESENT. A SUMMARY AND CHARTS ARE ATTACHED. PACBELL
NOTED THAT ITS FINANCIALS HAVE BEEN FLAT OVER THE LAST 6 YEARS, THAT GROWTH RA
TES ARE DECLINING, AND AS A CONSEQUENCE, REAL REVENUE NEUTRALITY IS OF UTMOST
IMPORTANCE. PACBELL EXPLAINED ITS GENERAL SUPPORT FOR THE ASSIGNED ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHILIP J. QUIGLEY, CONTACTED CMMRS. CONLON, ECKERT, FESSLER &SHUMWAY ON 8/25/93
AND CMMR. KNIGHT ON 8/27/93. PACBELL DELIVERED A WRITTEN PACKAGE OF "SOLUTIONS"
ENTITLED "REVITALIZING CALIFORNIA: TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTRE FOR GLOBAL
LEADERSHIP" (ATTACHED) TO EACH OF THE COMMISSIONERS. PACBELL MAKES THE
FOLLOWING POINTS: IN MOST REGARDS NRF HAS WORKED AS INTENDED ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. RICHARD SEVERY OF MCI CONTACTED CMMR CONLON ON 8/19/93 IN S.F. AL
SO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL PRESENTED AND ATTACHED. MCI URGED TH
E COMMISSION TO EMBRACE A FULLER MEASURE OF COMPETITIVE ENTRY AND ELIMINATE ALL
BLOCKING AND HOLDING OUT RESTRICTIONS FOR IXC TOLL CALLING..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 27, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. WILLIAM C. HARRELSON OF MCI MET WITH AND PHONED JAMES GREIG, ADVIS
OR TO CMMR. ECKERT ON 8/19/93 IN S.F. WRITTEN MATERIALS ATTACHED. HARRELSON
EMPHASIZED THE IMPORTANCE TO FAIR COMPETITION THAT LECS BE REQUIRED TO IMPUTE
THE TARIFFED RATE FOR MONOPOLY BUILDING BLOCKS IN THEIR TOLL PRICE FLOORS AND
THAT THERE IS NO REASON THAT THE COST OF THE VARIABLES..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
RICHARD PURKEY AND SETH LUBIN OF SPRINT SPOKE WITH PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO
CMMR. SHUMWAY, BY PHONE ON 8/23/93. SPRINT FOLLOWED UP WITH WRITTEN MATERIAL
REGARDING THE RATES AND METHODOLOGY USED TO CALCULATE A PER MINUTE SWITCHED ACC
ESS COST INCURRED BY SPRINT. TWO TABLES COMPARE THE EXPENSE TO IEC'S FOR A TYP
ICAL PHONE CALL AT CURRENT TARIFF RATES AND AT THE RATES ADOPTED, ..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: TURN
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA AND PACIFIC BELL TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.89-10-031 OF GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
MICHAEL MORRIS AND ART AMMON, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/19/93 IN SF. KAREN JO
NES OF CACD WAS PRESENT. THE TELEPORT REPS DISCUSSED THEIR SUPPORT FOR THE ASSI
GNED COMMISSIONERS RULING AND THEIR OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
|
|
Description:
RICHARD PURKEY, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/19/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. THE SPRINT REPS DISCUSSED THE BENEFI
TS OF UNRESTRICTED INTRALATA COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
THOMAS LONG, CONTACTED CMMRS. FESSLER, ECKERT, SHUMWAY AND CONLON BY LETTER ON
8/19/93. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. THE LETTER STATED THAT THE
ISSUE OF ALLOCATING JOINT AND COMMON COSTS OF THE TELEPHONE NETWORK WAS
CRITICAL TO THE CPUC'S REGULATORY DELIBERATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 NOTICES OF EXPARTE: CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWREY, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/18/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. THE PACBELLL REPS DISC
USSED THE BENCHMARK RATE OF RETURN, THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR AND PACIFIC'S CAPIT
AL INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
CARRINGTON PHILLIP CONTATED JAMES CRIEG, ADV TO CMMR. ECKERT ON 8/18/93 IN SF.
GLEN SEMOV, OF CCTA WAS PRESENT. THE CTA REPS ALSO CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD,
ADV TO CMMR. SHUMWAY IN A SEPARATE MEETING ON THE SAME DATE. THE CCTA REPS DISC
USSED THEIR INTENTION TO FILE A PROTEST TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF
D.89-10-031, SAYING THAT GTEC SHOULD HAVE FILED AN APPL. W/SUPPORTING TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF C
|
|
Description:
EDWARD WOLFE, CONTACTED ALJ AMAROLI AND ALJ LEE BY LETTER ON 8/18/93. WRITTEN M
ATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. WOLFE EXPRESSED SUPPORT FOR THE
PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWREY, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/18/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
GUELDNER SAID THAT WHATEVER RATE DESIGN THE CPUC ADOPTS, IT MUST BE REVENUE
NEUTRAL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/18/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
THE AT&T REPS DISCUSSED THEIR SUPPORT FOR THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AN
D THE NEED FOR UNRESTRICTED INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
JAMES MILES AND JEFFREY CUTHERELL CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/12/93 IN SF.
OTHERS WERE PRESENT.THE CONTEL REPS DISCUSSED CONTEL'S COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED
DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING. THEY SAID THAT THE DECISION SHOUL
D SHOW A REVENUE REQUIREMENT OF $13 MILLION, NOT $9.4 MILLION. THEY ALSO SAID
THAT THE CHCF SHOULD BE REACTIVATED AND THE DECISION SHOULD ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON BY LETTER ON 8/18/93. WRITTEN MATERIAL
WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. GUELDNER'S LETTER SAID THAT PACBELL
SUPPORTS THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND IS CONCERNED ABOUT THE ALJ'S
DRAFT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY: ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY: ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY: ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
REPLY: ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY: ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALL OTHER FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AG
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
(2)REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER' RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER' RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER' RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/MICKIEWICZ/THAYER/P
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER' RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
THE VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION AND ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. (THE)
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(2) REPLY; TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING AND PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKT/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: (2) TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS & CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TIM MCCALLION, CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT AND HER ADV JAMES GREIG ON 8/16/93 IN SF.
GTEC POINTED OUT THAT IRD IS THE FIRST OVERALL RATE DESIGN FOR GTEC'S RATES
SICNE 1984 AND AN INEVITABLE RESULT OF IRD IS THAT GTEC WILL LOSE MARKET SHARE.
GTEC NOTED THAT THE DECISION IS NOT REVENUE NEUTRAL IN THAT IT ELIMINATES THE
WITHOUT OFFSETTING REVENUES; NEITHER THE DECISION NOR THE RULING ..., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJS AMAROLI AND LEE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: DRA/MICKIEWICZ
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: DRA AND AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA DISCUSSED THE CORRECTION OF THE IRD REVENUE REQUIREMENT
IMPACT ON CONTEL AND THE NEED TO ALLOW SMALL AND MID-SIZED LECS TO CONCUR IN
PACBELL'S TOLL DISCOUNT PLANS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PACIFIC BELL SAID IF FAVORED THE APPROACH IN THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
SAYING THAT BASIC RATES SHOULD BE INCREASED AND TOLL RATES MUST BE DECREASED.
IT ALSO SAID THAT ITS COST STUDIES WERE ACCURATE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
JOHN CHAN CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/18/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE DRA
REPS SAID THAT HTE ASSIGNED COMMR'S RULING WOULD ENCOURAGE COMPETITION. THEY
EXPLAINED THEIR END-USER SURCHARGE PROPOSAL. THEY DISCUSSED POTENTIAL IMPACTS
ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND INDICATED THEIR SUPPORT FOR REACTIVATION OF THE CALIFO
RNIA HIGH COST FUND FOR A ONE-YEAR PERIOD
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
IN A GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR. ECKERT ON 8/16/93 IN S.F. TELEPORT COMMUNICATIO
NS GROUP STATED ITS DISSATISFACTION WITH THE PROPOSED DECISION AND EXPRESSED IT
S SUPORT FOR THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING. IT EMPHASIZED THE NEED FOR
CENTREX COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
IN A GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR. ECKERT ON 8/16/93 IN S.F. CENTEX SAID THAT SMAL
L AND MEDIUM BUSINESSES ARE WILLING TO PAY COSTBASED RATES FOR LEC SERVICES AND
SAID THAT THE LECS SHOULD PROVIDE PROPER LRIC STUDIES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES BY: (1 EA.) CENTEX, TURN, PACBELL, & CPA ON 8/12/93 MEETINGS
AND EX-PARTE NOTICES BY: (1 EA) MCI, CPA, AND TURN NOTICES FOR MEETING ON
8/16/93 ALSO ONE EX-PARTE NOTICE - TURN FROM 8/14/93 MAILING
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRA PARTICIPATED IN GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR ECKERT ON 8/16/93 IN SF. DRA STATE
D THAT THE SASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING WOULD ENCOURAGE COMPETITION BUT FELT
THAT BOTH THE RULING AND THE PROPOSED DECISION FILED TO DEMONSTRATE REVENUE NE
UTRALITY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
AT&T PARTICIPATED IN GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR ECKERT ON 8/16/93 IN SF. AT&T SAI
D THE CPUC SHOULD NOT RESTRICT COMPETION OF IEC TOLL CALLING WITHIN THE LATA, S
UPPORTED ELIMINATION OF CARRIER COMMON LINE CHARGE AND ADVOCATED THE MERGER OF
PRIVATE LINE AND SPECIAL ACCESS TARIFFS. WRITTEN MATERIAL USED AND ATTACHED.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PJ QUIGLEY, PRESIDENT OF PACBELL CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND JAMES GRIEG, ADVISO
R TO CMMR. ECKERT ON 8/12/93 IN S.F. OTHERS ALSO PRESENT. PACBELL REPS DISCUSS
ED THEIR SUPPORT FOR CMMR. SHUMWAY'S PROPOSAL FOR THE $13 RESIDENTIAL FLAT RATE
CHARGE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARDS UTILITY RATE NORMALIZA
|
|
Description:
AUDRIE KRAUSE OF TURN CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND JAMES GRIEG, ADVISOR CMMR ECKE
RT ON 8/12/93 IN S.F. OTHERS ALSO PRESENT. THETURN REPS SAID THAT THE LARGE
TOLL RATE DECREASES SOUGHT BY PACBELL AND GTEC ARE UNNECESSARY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
JULIA RUSSO, EXEC DIRECTOR OF CPA CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON & JAMES GRIEG, ADVISOR
TO CMMR. ECKERT ON 8/12/93 IN S.F. OTHERS ALSO PRESENT. THE CPA REPS DISCUSSE
D INCREASES IN PACBELL'S RATES FOR COPT SERVICES..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TURN REPS PARTICIPATED IN 8/16/93 GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR. ECKERT, ET AL, AND
SAID THAT THE LECS HAD FIALED TO SUPPORT THEIR CLAIM THAT RESIDENTIAL BASIC EXC
HANGE SERVICE IS RECEIVING A LARGE SUBSIDY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TURN REPS REQUESTED THAT SOME OF ITS MEMBERS CONTACT CMMRS. FESSLER, ECKERT, SH
UMWAY AND CONLON BY SENDING THEM A POSTCARD PROVIDED BY TURN WHICH URGES THAT B
ASIC TELEPHONE SERVICE AFFORDABLE FOR ALL CALIFORNIANS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
MARTIN MATTES CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 8/16/93 AND DISCUSSED THE ASSIGNMENT OF
NON-TRAFFIC-SENSITIVE COSTS OF LOCAL LOOP PLANT, SAYING THAT THOSE COSTS ARE I
NCURRED PRIOR TO ANY REQUEST FOR SERVICE.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
WALTER MCGEE OF CENTEX CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON, AND JAMES GREIG, ADVISOR TO CMMR
ECKERT ON 8/12/93 IN S.F. OTHERS ALSO PRESENT. THE CENTEX REPS SAID THAT THE
ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING MET THE NEEDS OF SMALL BUSINESS BETTER THAN THE
PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
MCI REPS PARTICIPATED IN GROUP MEETING WITH CMMR. ECKERT ON 8/16/93. MCI DISCU
SSED PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CPUC UNBUNDLING, IMPUTATION AND NONDISCRIMIN
ATORY ACCESS REQUIREMENTS AS A PREREQUISITE TO LEC PRICING FLEXIBILITY AND THE
PROPOSED DECISION'S REQUIREMENT FOR IECS TO FLOW THROUGH ACCESS CHARGE REDUCTIO
NS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. EX-PARTE NOTICE: CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION OF GTEC CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 8/12/93 IN S.F. OTHERS WER
E ALSO PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. THE GTEC REPS SAID
THAT THE COMPANY WOULD HAVE A REVENUE SHORTFALL UNLESS THE TOLL ELASTICITY FIG
URE WAS MODIFIED..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. JAMES MILES & JEFFREY CUTHERELL OF CONTEL CONTACTED CM
MR. CONLON ON 8/12/93 IN S.F. OTHERS ALSO PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL USED AND
ATTACHED. CONTEL REPS DISCUSSED CONTEL'S COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AND
ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJS/LEE/AMAROLI/PUC
|
|
Description:
SETS SCHEDULE FOR PRESENTATIONS; SETS PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS; DENIES
ALLIED RADIOTELEHPNE AND LA CELLULAR 10 MINUTES TO ADDRESS COMMISSION; GRANTS
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENT COMMENTS AND LA CELLU
LAR AND ALLIED RADIOTELEPHONES LATE FILED COMMENTS; ALL REPLY COMMENTS SHALL BE
FILED BY 8/23/93
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 12, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 12, 1993
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE COMMENTS ON ALJ'S PROPOSED DECISION; COMMENTS ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 12, 1993
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE COMMENTS ON ALJ'S PROPOSED DECISION; COMMENTS ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: AT&T AND CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
TERRY MURRAY OF CENTEX CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 8
/6/93 IN SF. STEVEN BOWEN FOR CENTEX WAS ALSO PRESENT. THE CENTEX REPRES SOUGH
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE PROPOSED PRICING RULES FOR CATE
GORY I AND II SERVICES.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CELLUALR CARRIERS OF CALIFORNI
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAEMENT
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO (THE)
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO. (THE)
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
OPEING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
INTELLICALL, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ALARM ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
TO THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALLIED RADIO TELEPHONE UTILITI
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCCAWCELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS I
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTE
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIAITON OF LONG
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
MURRAY, MICHAEL
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
RICE, MARYBETH
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALL OTHER FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AG
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L.P.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJS AMAROLI AND LEE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: MICHAEL MURRAY AND MARYBETH RICE (LATE FILED)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF
|
|
Description:
CHARLES MILLER OF AT&T CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR CONLON ON
8/5/93 IN S.F. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. SMITH SAID AT&T SUP
PORTED THE IDEAS IN CMMR. SHUMWAY'S RULING..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
TERRY MURRAY OF CENTEX CONTACTED PHOEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR SHUMWAY ON
8/5/93 IN S.F. MURRAY ASKED ABOUT THE EXTRA MATERIAL FILED BY PACBELL IN ITS O
PENING COMMENTS ON THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
JOHN RAPOSA FOR GTEC CONTACTED ALJ REED BY PHONE ON 8/5/93. RAPOSA INFORMED AL
J REED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD PARAGRAPH 10 OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT TO MEAN THAT
UPON ISSUANCE OF BLS INDEX AND A REQUEST FROM ANY INTERESTED PARTY, IT WOULD B
E APPROPRIATE FOR CACD TO CONVENE A WORKSHOP TO INVESTIGATE..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PM OF D.89-10-031 BY PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CA PAYPHONE ASSN
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
MARTIN MATTES FOR CPA CONTACTED ALJ LEE ON 8/2/93 IN S.F. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS
USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. MATTES DELIVERED A COPY OF CPA'S SUMMARY
OUTLINE OF POSITION IN THE IRD POSITION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACIFIC TELESIS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
FOR ACCEPTANCE OF LATE-FILED COMMENTS RE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING:
COMMENTS ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALLIED RADIOTELEPHOEN UTILITIE
|
|
Description:
FOR ACCEPTANCE OF LATE-FILED COMMENTS RE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING:
COMMENTS ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
MURRAY, MICHAEL
|
|
Description:
JOTHAM STEIN, COUNSEL OF MURRAY AND RICE, CONTACTED ALJ LEE ON 7/30/93 BY LETTE
R. WRITTEN MATERIAL IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. THE LETTER PROVIDED A SUMMARY
OUTLINE OF MURRAY AND RICE'S IRD POSITION WHICH THAT THE CPUC SHOULD INCORPORAT
E ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS FOR CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL TELEPHONE CONSUMERS RECEIVING
TELEPHONE SERVICE FROM PBX RESELLERS (LATE FILED)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
RICE, MARYBETH
|
|
Description:
JOTHAM STEIN, COUNSEL OF MURRAY AND RICE, CONTACTED ALJ LEE ON 7/30/93 BY LETTE
R. WRITTEN MATERIAL IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. THE LETTER PROVIDED A SUMMARY
OUTLINE OF MURRAY AND RICE'S IRD POSITION WHICH THAT THE CPUC SHOULD INCORPORAT
E ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS FOR CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL TELEPHONE CONSUMERS RECEIVING
TELEPHONE SERVICE FROM PBX RESELLERS (LATE FILED)
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.89-10-031 BY GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE: DRA - MICKIEWICZ
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OF D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENT TO COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S
RULING: APPENDIX A ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
OF D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
MIKE AMATO AND BRIAN CHANG OF DRA CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. S
HUMWAY ON 7/30/93 IN S.F. ALSO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL USED AND
ATTACHED. DRA REPS EXPLAINED ITS RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CPUC INCREASE PACBEL
L'S PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR FROM 4.5 TO 5.5 PERCENT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC TELESIS
|
|
Description:
RICHARD ODGERS, CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 7/30/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. HAUSMAN SAID THAT IT WOULD BE A MIST
AKE TO PERIODICALLY RECALIBRATE PACIFIC'S RATE-OF-RETURN OR PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR
SINCE THAT WOULD AMOUNT TO A RETURN TO RATE BASE, RATE-OF-RETURN REGULATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CITIZENS UTILITIES CO
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL AND GTE
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FROM ALJ-MALCOLM TO CMMR-SHUMWAY & ALJ-LEE PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF
D89-10-031 BY GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO
|
|
Description:
DONALD ROBERTON, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV TO CMMR. CONLON, JAMES GREIG, ADV
TO CMMR. ECKERT, AND JOE DEULLOA, ADV TO CMMR. FESSLER ON 7/27/93 IN SF. OTHERS
WERE PRESENT. THE CITIZENS REPS SAID CITIZENS GENERALLY SUPPORTED THE POLICY DI
RECTION OF THE ASSIGNED COMMR'S RULING, BUT SUGGESTED THAT NEW RATES AND INTROD
UCTION OF COMPETITION INTO ITS SERVICE AREA SHOULD BE DELAYED.., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, CONTACTED PHOEBE GREENWOOD, ADV TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 7/28/93 IN SF.
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. THE PACBELL
REPS DISCUSSED IRD IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS AUGMENTED NOTICE OF 8/2/93
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JERRY OLIVER FOR PACBELL CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADV. TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 7/
29/93 BY PHONE. OLIVER SOUGHT CLARIFICATION OF THE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RUL
ING ON CCL ELIMINATION, PRICING POLICIES FOR AREAS NOT ADDRESSED IN IRD, THE NA
TURE OF THE COMPETITION FOR CENTREX..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
REGARDING ASSIGNED CMMR'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION OF GTEC CONTACTED PHEOBE GREENWOOD , ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY
ON 7/29/93 BY PHONE. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE.
MCCALLION DISCUSSED THE ASSIGNED COMMRS. RULING PRO POSAL TO ELIMINATE THE CCLC
AND GTEC'S ATTEMPT TO QUANTIFY THE IMPACT OF THE RA TES..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY OF PAC BELL CONTACTED PHEOBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON
7/28/93 IN S.F. OTHERS ALSO PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS
ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. THE PACBEEL REPS DISCUSSED IRD IMPLEMENTATION PROBL
EMS.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO. (THE)
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT, INC.
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYST
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L.P
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSEUS FORUM
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I.FORUM
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATION
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP,
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIAITO
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSION'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSION'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSION'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND ALL
|
|
Description:
ON ASSIGNED COMMISSION'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 26, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PM OF D89-10-031 BY GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 23, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJS/AMAROLI/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
SETS FULL PANEL HEARING FOR 8/30/93 IN LA; REQUESTS TO SPEAK AT FPH DUE 8/2/93;
SETS WORKSHOP FOR 8/24/93; REPEALS THE PROHIBITION AGAINST EX PARTE COMMUNICATI
ONS; ETC AS SET FORTH
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE-FILED COMMENTS; COMMENTS ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES TURN'S MOTION TO ADMIT EXHIBIT 28 INTO EVIDENCE; OPENING BRIEFS DUE 9/10
/93; REPLY BRIEFS DUE 10/5/93; BRIEF SHOULD INCLUDE SUBJECT MATTER INDEX OF
TESTIMONY AND BE 3 HOLE PUNCHED
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
OF D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
AIRPORTS COMMISSION'S PETITION TO INTERVENE AND PETITION FOR MODIFICATION SHALL
BE DOCKETED IN OII84 ONLY; PARTIES WHO PLAN TO RESPOND SHALL USE THE OII84
CAPTION HEADING AND SHALL SERVE PLEADINGS ON OII84 SERVICE LIST
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJS AMAROLI AND LEE
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BY MFS
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/AMAROLI/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
COMMR/SHUMWAY/PUC
|
|
Description:
IDENTIFIES KEY AREAS OF DISAGREEMENT WITH ALJS' PROPOSED DECISION; COMMENTS ON
THIS RULING DUE BY 8/2/93; REPLY COMMENTS ON THIS RULING DUE 8/23/93 AND MAY BE
APPENDED TO REPLY COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED BY METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BY METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 NOTICES OF EXPARTE: COMMUNICATIONS WORKER OF AMERICA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: DRA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKER OF AMERI
|
|
Description:
JANICE WOOD, AND ANTONIO SALAZAR-HOBSON, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AT 1:30 PM AND
CMMR. SHUMWAY AT 11 AM ON 7/9/93 IN SF. THE CWA REPS REITERATED THEIR POSITION
THAT THE 4.5. PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR CURRENTLY ESTABLISHED BY THE NRF SHOULD BE
MAINTAINED RATHER THAN INCREASED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 7/12/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. GUELDNER DISCUSSED THE PURPOSED OF
THE REVIEW OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. HE STATED THAT PACBELL'S FINANCIAL
RESULTS DURING THE PAST THREE YEARS SUPPORT PACBELL'S POSITION THAT NO CHANGE
TO THE PRODUCTIVITY OR ROR TARGETS ARE NEEDED AT THIS TIME
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
SUBMITTAL; VOLUME 24
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ED TEXEIRA, CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 7/12/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. DRA EXPLAINED ITS
RECOMMENDATION THAT PACIFIC BELL'S PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR INCREASE FROM 4.5%
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 12, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 12, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 7/8/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. GUELDNER DISCUSSED THE PURPOSED OF
THE REVIEW OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. HE STATED THAT PACBELL'S FINANCIAL
RESULTS DURING THE PAST THREE YEARS SUPPORT PACBELL'S POSITION THAT NO CHANGE
TO THE PRODUCTIVITY OR ROR TARGETS ARE NEEDED AT THIS TIME
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 7/2/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED. GUELDNER DISCUSSED THE PURPOSED OF
THE REVIEW OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. HE STATED THAT PACBELL'S FINANCIAL
RESULTS DURING THE PAST THREE YEARS SUPPORT PACBELL'S POSITION THAT NO CHANGE
TO THE PRODUCTIVITY OR ROR TARGETS ARE NEEDED AT THIS TIME
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 7/2/93 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT.
GUELDNER DISCUSSED THE PURPOSED OF THE VIEW OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. HE
STATED THAT PACBELL'S FINANCIAL RESULTS DURING THE PAST THREE YEARS SUPPORT
PACBELL'S POSITION THAT NO CHANGE TO THE PRODUCTIVITY OR ROR TARGETS ARE NEEDED
AT THIS TIME
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FOR PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D92-01-023 AND D93-05-014 FROM ALJ-CAREW,
ALJ-WALKER, AND ALJ-AMAROLI TO ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMER
|
|
Description:
JANICE WOOD, V.P., JOHN HOWARD, AND ANTONIO SALAZAR-HOBSON, ALL OF THE COMMUNIC
ATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 6/29/93 IN S.F. THE CWA R
EPS REITERATED THEIR POSITION THAT THE 4.5 PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR CURRENT ESTABLIS
HED BY THE NRF SHOULD BE MAINTAINED RATHER THAN INCREASED.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D93-05-014 AND D92-01-023 OF THE CITY AND COUNTY O
F SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORTS COMMISSION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 28, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE BY THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT
S COMMISSION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ACCOMPANYING PETITION FOR MODIFICATIO
N AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031 OF PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
|
|
Description:
FOR A RULING SHORTENING TIME TO RESPOND AND EXPEDITED COMMISSION ACTION
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/LEE AND AMAROLI/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENYING MOTION OF METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR AN
EXPEDITED INTERIM ORDER REQUIRING CATEGORY II TREATMENT OF, AND AUTHORIZING
COMPETITION FOR, CENTREX LOOP SERVICES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION OF GTEC CONTACTED PHOEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWA Y
ON 6/2/93 IN S.F. MCCALLION DISCUSSED THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE 1992 N
RF REVIEW..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 24, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REJ. LTR. TO METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS, RE: OPPOSITION
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES PACIFIC BELL'S 4/22 AND 4/26 MOTIONS TO STRIKE ALL OR PORTIONS OF DIRECT
TESTIMONY OF VARIOUS WITNESSES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES - PAC BELL & GTE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 5/10/93 IN SF. ALSO OTHERS WERE PR
ESENT. GTEC REPS DISCUSSED THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REACHED IN THE 1992 NRF RE
VIEW..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER OF PACBELL CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 5/11/93 IN WASHINGTON D.C.
GUELDNER DISCUSSED A SPEECH HE DELIVERED ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY ISSU
ES..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER OF PACBELL SENT A LETTER TO PHOEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR OF CMMR. SH
UMWAY ON 5/7/93 WHICH DISCUSSED A SPEECH GUELDNER WAS TO GIVE ON 5/11/93. THE
SPEECH DISCUSSED CA'S INCENTIVE FRAMEWORK..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE FOR RATEPA
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO PAC BELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
JOINT: FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
JOINT: FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
JOINT: FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS REQUEST OF TURN AND KENNETH BATES FOR ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE FURTHER PARTS OF THE PREPARED TESTIMONY OF CALIFORNIA BANKERS
CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION, ET AL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE PRE-FILED TESTIMONY OF CBCHA/COUNTY/TCA WITNESS LEE
L. SELWYN
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE ALL OR PARTS OF THE PREPARED TESTIMONY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
AND ALL OTHER FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES, ET AL.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE RESPONSE; RESPONSE ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/RAMSEY/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS MC CAW'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXHIBIT A TO ITS LETTER TO COMMR.
ECKERT DATED 12/8/92 UNDER SEAL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
CONFIRMS ACTIONS TAKEN IN 4/6/93 PHC; PACIFIC GIVEN LEAVE TO SUBMIT OPENING
TESTIMONY REGARDING THE GTEC SETTLEMENT AND DENIES LEAVE TO SUBMIT TESTIMONY ON
FRAMEWORK MODIFICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS FOR AN EXPEDITED INTERIM ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMER
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND ALL
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY,
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
JOINT
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G. I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL OF EDITH ADAME
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1993
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
OF NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL EDITH ADAME
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE FOR AT&T --- (AND; DRA, TURN, MCI, CENTEX, GTEC)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER & LYNN MOWERY, BOTH FOR PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON
4/1/93 IN SAN FRANCISCO. PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, WAS ALSO
PRESENT. PACBELL EXPLAINED ITS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF
A PORTION OF THE ALJ'S RULING OF MARCH 25, 1993, DEFINING ISSUES TO BE ADDRESS
ED IN THE 1992 NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK REVIEW. PACBELL HAS REQUESTED ..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CAIFORN
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH FOR AT&TC, ETC.(DRA, MCI, TURN, GTEC, CENTREX) CONTACTED JOE D
EULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER ON 4/2/93 IN SF. ALSO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. T
HE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO EXPLAIN A SETTLEMENT REACHED ON ISSUES 1-7 OF
THE ISSUES SCHEDULED FOR HEARING..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DANIEL MCCARTHY, FOR PACBELL, CONTACTED ALJ JACQUELINE REED ON 3/31/93 BY PHONE
IN S.F. MCCARTHY TOLD ALJ REED THAT PACIFIC WOULD BE FILING A MOTION FOR RECON
SIDERATION OF AN ALJ RULING. THE MOTION WILL DISCUSS WHY PACBELL BELIEVES IT
IS INAPPROPRIATE TO APPLY THE TERMS DISCUSS WHAT CHANGES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED T
O ACCELERATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF CALIFORNIA'S TELECOMMUNICATIONS ..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ALJ'S RULING
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION, FOR GTEC, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON, ON 3/26/93, IN SAN FRANCIS
CO. ALSO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. GTEC DISCUSSED THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
GTEC AND ALL PARTIES TO THE "1992 NRF REVIEW" OF INCENTIVE REGULATION. MCCALLI
ON GAVE SPECIFICS OF THE SETTLEMENT ITSELF INCLUDING THE SETTLED PRODUCTIVITY
FACTORS OF 5.0% FOR 1994, 4.8% FOR 1995 AND 4.6% FOR 1996. IN ADDITION, ..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 1993
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
FOR AN EXPEDITED INTERIM ORDER REQUIRING CATEGORY II TREATMENT OF, AND AUTHORIZ
ING COMPETITION FOR, CENTREX LOOP SERVICES
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENYING PACBELL'S REQUESTS; REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE SET FORTH IN 3/2/93 RUL
ING REMAINS UNCHANGED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN A. GUELDNER, OF PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON 3/16/93 IN SAN FRANCI
SCO. OTHER PERSON PRESENT WAS PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY. GUEL
DNER STATED THAT PACBELL IS VERY CONCERNED THAT THE PROCEDURES CURRENTLY CONTEM
PLATED FOR REVIEWING THE GTEC SETTLEMENT COULD IMPROPERLY INFLUENCE PACBELL'S
NRF REVIEW. HE ADDED THAT PACBELL BELIEVES THAT EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT FOR ..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 16, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION, OF GTEC, AND ED TEXEIRA, OF DRA, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH,
ADVISOR TO CMMR. CONLON; A SECOND MEETING WITH CMMR. ECKERT; A THIRD WITH CMMR.
FESSLER, BARBARA HALE AND JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISORS TO CMMR. FESSER AND A 4TH M
EETING WITH CMMR. SHUMWAY AND HIS ADVISOR, PHEBE GREENWOOD, ON 3/11/93 IN S.F.
GTEC INFORMED THE COMMISSIONERS OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REACHED ..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WHICH
WAS FILED ON 3/9/93 AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF 3/10/93. PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
CONTEL FO CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL AND THIRTEEN OTHER PARTIES FOR AN ORDER EXTENDI
NG THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AND ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES
FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WHICH WAS FILED ON 3/9/93
AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF 3/10/93. DANIEL J. MC CARTHY ATTY FOR PACBELL
CONTACTED ALJ REED BY PHONE AT 4:00 PM ON 3/5/93. MCCARTHY DISCUSSED PACBELL'S
PRELIMINARY POSITION ON THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT BETWEEN GTE CALIFORNIA AND CERT
AIN PARTIES IN THE PROCEEDING. MC CARTHY'S COMMUNICATION WAS CONFIRMED..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 9, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DANIEL J. MC CARTHY, ATTORNEY FOR PAC BELL CONTACTED ALJ REED BY PHONE AT 4:00
PM ON 3/5/93. MCCARTHY DISCUSSED PAC BELL'S PRELIMINARY POSITION ON THE
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT BETWEEN GTE CALIFORNIA AND CERTAIN PARTIES IN THE PROCEEDIN
G. MCCARTHY'S COMMUNICATION WAS CONFIRMED IN A LETTER SENT TO ALJ REED ON 3/8/
93, WITH COPIES TO ALL PARTIES. LETTER ATTACHED. AUGMENTATION REQUIRED.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AND
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTEC OF CLAIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
THE VLOCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1993
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE PERIOD TO COMMENT ON THE PROPOSED DECISION AN
ALLOWING ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF AN EXPARTE COMMUNICATION WHICH WAS FILED ON 2/26
/93 AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF 3/1/93. LYNN MOWERY, OF PACBELL, PROVIDED
BRIEFING MATERIAL FOR AN UPCOMING NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REG. UTILITY COMMISSI
ONERS MEETING TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 2/17/93; JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMR. FESS
LER, ON 2/18/93; PETER O'DONNELL, ADVISOR TO CMMR. ECKERT, ON 2/9/93; ..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
CHANGING SCHEDULE FOR SUBMITTING TESTIMONY; PHC AND EVIDENTIARY HEARING
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 2, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER BY AND BETWEEN GTEC AND CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 1993
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 26, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. LYNN MOWERY, PACIFIC BELL'S MGR. OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
PROVIDED BRIEFING MATERIAL FOR AN UPCOMING NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY U
TILITY COMMISSIONERS MEETING TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 2/17/93; JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVIS
OR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 2/18/93; PETER O'DONNELL, ADVISOR TO CMMR. ECKERT, ON 2
/9/93; RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON 2/23/93; PHEBE ..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 22, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CCTA'S MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND DATA RESPONSES
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR ENTRY OF A STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
JOINT; FOR ENTRY OF A STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 1993
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR RESELLERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS,
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE CELLULAR RESELLER ASSOCIATION INC'S OPPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR
SANCTIONS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 5, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE AMENDED REQUEST FOR FINDING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION OF KENNETH
BATES, JR.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 1993
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTIONS OF PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. TO ASSIGN
ED COMMR. SHUMWAY TO EXCLUDE FROM CONSIDERATION IN IRD EX PARTE CONTACTS MADE
12/8/92
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
January 29, 1993
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR RESELLERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF MCCAW ELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 26, 1993
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO ASSIGNED COMMR. SHUMWAY TO EXCLUDE FROM
CONSIDERATION IN IRD IMPROPER EX PARTE CONTACTS MADE 12/8/92 OR ALLOW ADVERSE
PARTIES TO SUBMIT RESPONSIVE INFORMATION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 1993
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER SHUMWAY TO EXCLUDE FROM CONSIDERATION IN IRD IMPROPER
EX PARTE CONTACTS MADE 12/8/92, OR ALLOW ADVERSE PARTIES TO SUBMIT RESPONSIVE I
NFORMATION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 14, 1993
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS,
|
|
Description:
FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING MCCAW TO FILE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION UNDERSEAL;
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ATTACHED; RESPONSES DUE 1/29/93 PER ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1993
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
SETS CURRENT SERVICE LIST FOR A92-05-002 AND A92-05-004
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
ALJ/CAREW/PUC
|
|
Description:
SETS SCHEDULE FOR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
WILLIAM HARRELSON OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO
CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON 12/8/92 BY PHONE. HARRELSON DISCUSSED PACBELL'S NOTICE OF
EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION FILED ON 12/3/92.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GRP
|
|
Description:
GAIL SCHWARTZ, OF TELEPORT, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 12/8/92 IN SAN FRANCISCO
SCHWARTZ STATED THAT COMPETITORS SHOULD BE EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED TO OFFER LOCAL
EXCHANGE SERVICES, ESPECIALLY CATERGORY II SERVICES AND EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT
DURATION OF THIS PROCEEDING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS (TWO EX-PARTE NOTICES - ENTERED SAME
DAY/FILED SAME DAY)
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: BAY AREA URBAN LEAGUE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: SAN MATEO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CHICANO FEDERATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
SETH LUBIN OF SPRINT CONTACTED CMMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT AND SHUMWAY, AND
ALJ'S AMAROLI AND LEE ON 12/8/92 BY LETTER. THE LETTER DISCUSSED SPRINT'S
INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE, THE ASPECTS OF THE
IRD DECISION THAT WOULD ALTER SPRINT'S INVESTMENT DECISIONS, AND THE AMOUNT OF
MONEY INVOLVED IN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT DECISIONS.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
SETH LUBIN OF SPRINT CONTACTED CMMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT AND SHUMWAY, AND
ALJ'S AMAROLI AND LEE ON 12/8/92 BY LETTER. THE LETTER DISCUSSED THE IMPACT OF
EXPANDED INTRALATA COMPETITION ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA URBAN LEAGUE
|
|
Description:
GEORGE MIX OF BAY AREA URBAN LEAGUE, CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
FESSLER, ON 12/7/92 BY PHONE. PRIOR TO THIS CONTACT, PACBELL HAD DISCUSSED ITS
POSITION IN THE IRD PROCEEDING WITH MR. MIX AND RECOMMENDED THAT HE MAKE HIS
VIEWS ON IRD KNOWN TO THE CPUC. MIX SUPPORTED PACBELL'S RATE REBALANCING
PROPOSAL.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
SAN MATEO COUNTY ECONOMIC
|
|
Description:
GLENN SMITH OF SAN MATEO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION CONTACTED
JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 12/7/92 BY PHONE. PRIOR TO THIS
CONTACT, PACBELL HAD DISCUSSED ITS POSITION IN THE IRD PROCEEDING WITH SMITH
AND RECOMMENDED THAT HE MAKE HIS VIEWS ON IRD KNOWN TO THE CPUC. SMITH SUPPORT
PACBELL'S RATE REBALANCING PROPOSAL.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
CHICANO FEDERATION
|
|
Description:
JESS HARO, A MEMBER OF THE CHICANO FEDERATION CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR
TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 12/7/92 BY PHONE. PRIOR TO THIS CONTACT, PACBELL HAD
DISCUSSED ITS POSITION IN THE IRD PROCEEDING WITH HARO AND RECOMMENDED THAT HE
MAKE HIS VIEWS ON IRD KNOWN TO THE CPUC. HARO SUPPORTED PACBELL'S RATE
REBALANCING PROPOSAL.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF
|
|
Description:
MANNY ROSALES OF CALIFORNIA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONTACTED JOSEPH
DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 12/7/92 BY PHONE. PRIOR TO THIS CONTACT,
PACBELL HAD DISCUSSED ITS POSITION IN THE IRD PROCEEDING WITH ROSALES AND
RECOMMENDED THAT HE MAKE HIS VIEWS ON IRD KNOWN TO THE CPUC. ROSALES SUPPORTED
PACBELL'S IRD PROPOSAL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THOMAS BALLO OF PACIFIC BELL, RESPONDED TO QUESTIONS ASKED BY THE COMMISSIONERS
AT THE ENBANC HELD ON 12/1/92. REGARDING INVESTMENT IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE, THE
LETTER ADVISED THAT PACBELL SPENT $1.6 BILLION IN CALIF IN 1991, INCREASING TO
AN EXPECTED $1.8 BILLION IN 1993. REGARDING PRICE FLOOR IMPUTATION, BALLO
ASSERTS THAT AT&T'S METHOD IS INCORRECT. AND THE PACBELL'S,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHILIP J. QUIGLEY OF PACIFIC BELL (PACBELL), CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 12/7/92
IN S.F. ALSO PRESENT WAS RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY. QUIGLEY
DISCUSSED THE 1992 NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK (NRF) REVIEW. HE POINTED OUT THAT
NRF IS NOT FINISHED IN CREATION AND IMPLEMENTATION; RECOMMENDED THAT THE 1992
NRF REVIEW BE LIMITED IN SCOPE; AND SUGGESTED THAT IT WOULD BE,..ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: SOUTH OF MARKET BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MISSION HIRING HALL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CELLULAR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
SOUTH OF MARKET BUSINESS
|
|
Description:
TRICIA JAMES, SOUTH OF MARKET BUSINESS ASSN., CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER, ON 12/4/
92 BY PHONE. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. PRIOR T
O THIS CONTACT, PACBELL HAD DISCUSSED ITS POSITION IN THE IRD PROCEEDING WITH J
AMES AND RECOMMENDED THAT SHE MAKE HER VIEWS ON IRD KNOWN TO THE CPUC. JAMES U
RGED THE CPUC TO ADOPT PACBELL'S PROPOSAL IN IRD.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, OF PACIFIC BELL, CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 12/4/92 IN SAN FRANCIS
CO. ALSO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE PACBELL REPRESENTATIVES DISCUSSED THE APPLI
CATION WHICH SEEKS LIMITED AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE MTS, WATS AND 800 CONTRACTS TO
CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE INDICATED TO PACBELL THAT THEY WILL BYPASS PACBELL'S PUBLIC
NETWORK AND OBTAIN THESE SERVICES FROM ALTERNATIVE PROVIDERS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
MISSION HIRING HALL
|
|
Description:
RICK SORRO, MISSION HIRING HALL, CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FES
SLER, ON 12/4/92 BY PHONE. PRIOR TO THIS CONTACT, PACBELL HAD DISCUSSED ITS PO
SITION IN THE IRD PROCEEDING WITH SORRO AND RECOMMENDED THAT HE MAKE HIS VIEWS
ON IRD KNOWN TO THE CPUC. SORRO SUPPORTED PACBELL'S RATE REBALANCING PROPOSAL
IN IRD.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
GERALD OLIVER, PACBELL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR. OHANIAN, AND
PHEBE GREENWOOD AND RICHARD SMITH, ADVISORS TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON 12/7/92 BY LE
TTER. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. OLIVER'S LETTE
R RESPONDED TO AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION BY BT NORTH AMERICA ON 11/10/92 IN WHI
CH BTNA DISCUSSED RESTRUCTURING OF THE LOCAL SWITCHING ELEMENT..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
MARTIN MATTES, OF CPA, CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 12/8/92 BY LETTER. WRITTEN MA
TERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. THE LETTER DISCUSSED INVESTMENT
S BY INDEPENDENT PAYPHONE PROVIDERS IN CALIFORNIA'S TELECOMMUNICATIONS
INFRASTRUCTURE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR CARRIERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
MARY CRANSTON, OF CCAC, CONTACTED CMMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT, AND SHU,WAY
ON 12/8/92 BY LETTER. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE
THE LETTER DISCUSSED THE IMPACT OF DRA'S PROPOSED END USER SURCHARGE ON THE
CELLULAR NMARKET IN CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
ROBERT GLOISTEIN, OF CONTEL, CONTACTED CMMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT, AND SH
UMWAY ON 12/7/92 BY LETTER. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE
NOTICE. THE LETTER DISCUSSED THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IRD AND INVESTMENT
DECISIONS, CONTEL'S VIEW OF ELASTICITY STUDIES, AND CONTEL'S EXPERIENCE IN EXIT
ING POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
MAGGIE WILDEROTTER, OF MCCAW CELLULAR, CONTACTED CMMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKER
T, AND SHUMWAY ON 12/18/92 BY LETTER. THE LETTER DISCUSSED INVESTMENTS BY
CELLULAR CARRIERS IN CALIFORNIA'S TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: UC-DAVIS CO-OP EXTENSION SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: DRA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH OF AT&T CONTACTED COMMISSIONERS FESSLER, ECKERT, AND OHANIAN
ON 12/8/92 IN S.F. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE.
THE LETTER DISCUSSED AT&T'S INVESTMENT IN CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS
INFRASTRUCTURE IN 1991, 1992 AND THE PROJECTED AMOUNT IN 1993, ASPECTS OF IRD
THAT COULD AFFECT AT&T'S INVESTMENT DECISIONS..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARLIN ARD OF PACIFIC BELL CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 12/7/92 BY LETTER. THE
LETTER RESPONDED TO CONCERNS RAISED BY CMMR. ECKERT AT AN EX PARTE CONTACT OF
10/2/92. THE LETTER DISCUSSED NEUTRAL REBALANCING OF RATES, DRA'S PROPOSAL TO
ELIMINATE THE CARRIER COMMON LINE CHARGE, MCI'S POSITION ON UNBUNDLING AND
PACBELL'S LONG RUN INCREMENTAL COST ESTIMATES.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARLIN ARD OF PACIFIC BELL CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON
12/3/92 IN S.F. ALSO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL REPRESENTATIVES DISCUSSED
PACBELL'S INCREMENTAL COST METHODS AND ESTIMATES, AND HOW PACBELL HAS UNBUNDLED
ITS COSTS.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN
|
|
Description:
THOMAS KEANE OF CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA,
ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 12/7/92 IN S.F. ALSO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. MATTES
EXPLAINED CPA'S GENERAL POSITION THAT THE CPUC SHOULD SEEK A MODERATE RATE
REBALANCING, PLACING THE BURDEN OF PROOF ON ADVOCATES OF DRASTIC RATE
REDUCTIONS AND DRASTIC RATE INCREASES. HE NOTED THAT MODERATING .., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
UC-DAVIS CO-OP EXTENSION
|
|
Description:
NICELMA KING OF UC-DAVIS CO-OP EXTENSION SERVICE CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA,
ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 12/3/92 BY PHONE AND BY LETTER. KING DISCUSSED
REDUCED INSTALLATION CHARGES, COMPETITIVE TOLL PRICES, PACBELL'S ABILITY TO
MAKE INVESTMENTS AND UNIVERSAL SERVICE.., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY
|
|
Description:
ANNI CHUNG OF SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 12/2/92 BY
LETTER. PACBELL HAD DISCUSSED ITS POSITION IN THE IRD PROCEEDING WITH CHUNG AND
RECOMMENDED THAT SHE MAKE HER VIEWS ON IRD KNOWN TO CPUC. CHUNG DISCUSSED
REDUCED TOLL PRICE PROPOSALS, AND LIFELINE SERVICE.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE: AT&T AND PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
BRIAN STROM, CONTACTED CMMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT AND SHUMWAY BE LETTER ON
12/7/92. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. THE LETTER D
ISCUSSED ROSEVILLE'S AGREEMENT WITH PACBELL TO EXIT THE SETTLEMENT POOLS ON 1/1
93 AND EXPLAINED HOW THIS WILL IMPACT BUSINESS BY REQUIRING ROSEVILLE TO CONSI
DER THE IMPACTS OF INTRALATA COMPETITION ON A STAND-ALONE BASIS WITHOUT..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
DRA/LOW & CHAN/PUC
|
|
Description:
NORMAN LOW AND JOHN CHAN, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON
12/4/92 IN S.F. ALSO PRESENT WERE HELEN MICKIEWICZ AND RUFUS THAYER, DRA. WRI
TTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. THE DISCUSSION CONCERNED
DRA'S POSITION AS STATED IN ITS IRD BRIEF. ISSUES DISCUSSED WERE COMPETITION
IN THE LATA AS IT NOW EXISTS; THE REQUIREMENT OR REVENUE NEUTRALITY..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXHIBIT
|
Filing Date:
December 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING
|
|
Description:
MICHAEL WINTER OF THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING, CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON
12/2/92 BY PHONE. PRIOR TO THIS CONTACT, PACBELL HAD DISCUSSED ITS POSITION IN
THE IRD PROCEEDING WITH WINTER AND RECOMMENDED THAT HE MAKE HIS VIEWS ON IRD
KNOWN TO THE CPUC. WINTER TOLD FESSLER THAT PACBELL'S IRD PROPOSAL IS A
REASONABLE PLAN AND THAT DISABLED CUSTOMERS MAKE MANY INTRALATA CALLS.., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION AND COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
SUBMITTAL; VOLUME 220
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
ATTACHES CORRECTED SERVICE LIST
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH OF AT&T & MARLIN ARD, OF PACIFIC BELL CONTACTED ALJ GEORGE
AMAROLI AND ALJ EVELYN LEE ON 12/4/92 BY LETTER. THE LETTER REQUESTED WITHDRAW
AL FROM CONSIDERATION IN IRD OF AT&T INTRASTATE TOLL REDUCTIONS AND PACBELL ACC
ESS REDUCTIONS SET FORTH IN AT&T'S OPENING BRIEF AND PACBELL'S REPLY BRIEF
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATION OF CALIFORN
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH OF AT&T & MARLIN ARD, OF PACIFIC BELL CONTACTED ALJ GEORGE
AMAROLI AND ALJ EVELYN LEE ON 12/4/92 BY LETTER. THE LETTER REQUESTED WITHDRAW
AL FROM CONSIDERATION IN IRD OF AT&T INTRASTATE TOLL REDUCTIONS AND PACBELL ACC
ESS REDUCTIONS SET FORTH IN AT&T'S OPENING BRIEF AND PACBELL'S REPLY BRIEF
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH FABER, COUNSEL FOR CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE AND COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY. ALSO PRESENT WAS
LEE SELWYN, CONSULTANT TO CBCHA. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO
NOTICE. DISCUSSION CONCERNED RATES DESIGN PROPOSALS IN IRD.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH FABER, COUNSEL FOR CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE AND COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY. ALSO PRESENT WAS
LEE SELWYN, CONSULTANT TO CBCHA. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO
THE NOTICE. THE DISCUSSION CONCERNED RATES DESIGN PROPOSALS IN IRD.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH, OF AT&T, CONTACTED CMMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT AND SHUMWA
Y BY LETTER ON 12/1/92. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTIC
E. THE LETTER SAID THAT PACBELL HAD ERRED IN ALLEGING THAT IT HAD REDUCTED ACC
ESS CHARGES TO INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS BY $300 MILLION BEYOND THE MANDATED SPF-T
O-SLU REDUCTIONS AND THAT THE INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS, SPECIFICALLY AT&T..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST OF KENNETH BATES, JR. FOR FINDING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 25, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
ANN PONGRACZ, CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 11/20/92
IN S.F. ALSO PRESENT WERE RICHARD PURKEY, STAFF DIRECTOR-REGULATORY AND MARK
SIEVERS, DIRECTOR, REGULATORY POLICY. SIEVERS DISCUSSED RECENT RESEARCH STUDIES
WHICH SHOW THAT THERE IS NO STATISTICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN AUTHORIZATION OF
INTRALATA COMPETITION & INCREASES IN LOCAL SERV. RATES OR HARM TO UNIVERSAL SER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
TO THE REQUEST FOR FINDING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION OF KENNETH BATES, JR
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1992
|
Filed By:
ALJ/AMAROLI/LEE/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENYING PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC MOTION REQUESTING THAT THE DECEMBER 1, 1992 ORAL
ARGUMENT BEFORE THE COMMISSION EN BANC BE HELD IN CENTRAL LOS ANGELES INSTEAD
OF SAN FRANCISCO
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 23, 1992
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
SETS CORRECT TEMPORARY SERVICE LIST; NEW SERVICE LIST TO BE ISSUED AFTER
12/15/92, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: DRA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE : CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL ON 11-18-92
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF
|
|
Description:
(REPLY)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO., INC.
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ALVIN H. PELAVIN AND MARK P. SCHRIEBER OF COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, REPRESENTING
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, BY TELEPHONE ON 11/17/92. PELAVIN AND SCHRIEBER OBJESTED TO THE ALLOCA
TION OF ONE MINUTE TO EACH OF THE ABOVE LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS FOR PRESENTATIO
N OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL CASES AT THE EN BANC SCHEDULED FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
DRA/LOW & CHAN/PUC
|
|
Description:
LOW & CHAN OF DRA CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVSIOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON 11/18/9
2 IN S.F. ALSO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED
TO THE NOTICE. THE DISCUSSION CONCERNED DRA'S POSITION AS STATED IN ITS IRD BR
IEF. ISSUES DISCUSSED WERE COMPETITION IN THE LATA AS IT NOW EXISTS; THE REQUI
REMENT OF REVENUE NEUTRALITY; AN OVERVIEW OF DRA'S OBJECTIVES AND..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE; MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION TO INTERVENE BY VISA U.S.A. INC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX-PARTE: CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT CO
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
WALTER MCGEE CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, ON 11/13/92 IN
S.F. ALSO OTHERS WERE PRESENT. MCGEE DESCRIBED CENTEX AND ITS INTEREST IN THE
CASE. HE STATED THAT CENTEX HAD DEVELOPED AN OVERALL RATE DESIGN APPROACH
WHICH ADDRESSED LEC SERVICES, NOT JUST THOSE LEC SERVICES USED BY CENTEX'S
CLIENTS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
RICHARD SVERY, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 10/8/92 I
N S.F. ALSO PRESENT WERE WILLIAM HARRELSON, MCI AND RICHARD SMITH, CACD.
WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. MCI REPRESENTATIVE
EXPLAINED THE BUILDING BLOCK PROPOSAL OF MCI AND EXPLAINED THE DIFFERENCE BETWE
EN THE TOTAL SERVICE LONG RUN OR AVERAGE INCREMENTAL COST METHOD AND A..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
RICHARD SEVERY, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 10/13/92
IN S.F. ALSO PRESENT WERE WILLIAM HARRELSON, MCI AND RICHARD SMITH, CACD. WRI
TTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. MCI REPRESENTATIVES EXPL
AINED THE BUILDING BLOCK PROPOSAL OF MCI AND EXPLAINED THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN T
HE TOTAL SERVICE LONG RUN OR AVERAGE INCREMENTAL COST METHOD AND A..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
WILLIAM HARRELSON, RICHARD B SEVERY AND DR. MARK BRYANT OF MCI, CONTACTED PHEBE
GREENWOOD AND RICHARD SMITH, ADVISORS TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, AND KEVIN COUGHLAND, AD
VISOR TO CMMR. OHANIAN ON 10/26/92 IN S.F. THE MCI REPRESENTATIVES DESCRIBED M
CI'S INTEREST IN IRD AS ONE OF THE LARGEST MONOPLOY RATEPAYER AND A POTENTIAL C
OMPETITOR OF THE LECS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE ; PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
DANIEL RINEHART AND CHARLES MILLER, CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR.
OHANIAN, AND JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER ON 11/13/92 IN S.F.
MILLER DISCUSSED THE NEED FOR UNBLOCKING INTRALATA CALLING WITHIN THE LOCAL,ZUM
AND EAS CALLING AREAS, ESPECIALLY FOR CALLING CARD AND OPERATOR ASSISTED CALLS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARLIN ARD, AND RAY RUIZ, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD AND RICHARD SMITH, ADVISORS
TO CMMR. SHUMWAY, AND JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 11/10/92 IN
SF. ALSO PRESENT WAS LYNN MOWERY OF PACBELL. ARD DISCUSSED THE PAYPHONE INDUSTR
Y AND URGED ADOPTION OF THE LOCAL MEASURED RATE INCREASE TO COPT PROVIDERS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 12, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDER, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 11-9-92 IN
S.F. ALSO PRESENT WAS LYNN A MOWERY, OF PACBELL. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND
IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. GUELDNER DISCUSSED THE NEED FOR IRD REVENUE NEUTRALI
TY, POTENTIAL IMPAIRMENT OF INCENTIVE REGULATION, APPROPRIATE DEMAND ELASTICITI
ES, THE NEED FOR COMPETITIVE PRICES AND PRICE FLEXIBILITY, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); PHASE III IRD
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
VISA U.S.A. INC.
|
|
Description:
(INTERVENE) AND FILE A REPLY BRIEF; REPLY BRIEF ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
(REPLY)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
REPLY BRIEF; PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN IRD
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC
|
|
Description:
POST-HEARING REPLY BRIEF
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/WILSON/MICKIWEICZ/STAFF
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); IN THE IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN PHASE OF THE COMMISSIONS INVESTIGATI
ON OF THE ALTERNATIVE REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE
|
|
Description:
(CONCURENT REPLY BRIEF);IN THE IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN PHASE
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSN. OF LONG
|
|
Description:
(REPLY)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND ALL
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); ON PHASE III-IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFONRIA ALARM ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); ON IRD-PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEM OF
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR RESELLERS ASSN., INC.
|
|
Description:
(REPLY)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
(CONCRUUENT REPLY)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR CARRIERS ASSN. OF CAL
|
|
Description:
(REPLY);
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); RE END USER AND OTHER SURCHARGE PROPOSALS
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); IN SUPPORT OF UNIVERSAL TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR ALL COMMUNITIES OF COLOR
AND IN OPPOSITION TO MASSIVE RATE INCREASES FOR PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSULES FORUM
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); IN SUPPORT OF UNIVERSAL TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR ALL COMMUNITIES OF COLOR
AND IN OPPOSITION TO MASSIVE RATE INCREASES FOR PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); RE COMPETITION IMPLEMENTATION AND RATE DESIGN
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
(REPLY)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
(REPLY)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); IN THE INTRALATA COMPETITION & IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN PHASE
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); PHASE III IRD
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); PHASE III IRD
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); PHASE III IRD
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); PHASE III IRD
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); PHASE III IRD
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(REPLY); PHASE III IRD
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
P.J. QUIGLEY CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 11/2/92. RE: QUIGLEY AND J.A. GULDNER R
EVIEWED PACBELL'S PROPOSED THIRD YEAR IFR RATES AND ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE FILINGS OF AT&T ON 11-3-92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF CA
|
|
Description:
CHARLES MLLER, CONTACTED CMMR. OHANIAN ON 11-3-92 BY LETTER. THE LETTER IS ATT
ACHED TO THE NOTICE. IT LISTS AT&T'S COMPETITIVE TOLL RATE REDUCTIONS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT& T COMMUNICATIONS OF CA.
|
|
Description:
CHARLES MILLER, CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT AND JOE DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR.FESSLER
ON 11-3-92 BY LETTER. THE LETTER IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. IT DISCUSSES THE
THREE MOST CRITICAL ISSUES TO AT&T IN THE IRD PROCEEDING. THEY ARE: 1. CPUC
APPROVAL OF UNRESTRICTED 10XXX0+ CALLING; 2. THE IMPORTANCE OF A "LEVEL PLAYING
FIELD" FOR INTRALATA COMPETITION, AND ..., ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
GAIL SCHWARTZ CONTACTED CMMR. OHANIAN, PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 10/26/92. RE: ISSUES
IMPORTANT TO TCG IN THE IRD PROCEEDING, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
RICHARD BROMLEY CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 10/29/92. RE: NEED FOR INTRALATA UNB
LOCKING INCLUDING CALLING WITH THE LOCAL ZUM AND EAS CALLING AREA, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICES OF EX PARTE BY TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS,
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC HOLD ITS HEARING EN BANC IN CENTRAL LOS ANGELES TO PERMIT VITAL PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC HOLD ITS HEARING EN BANC IN CENTRAL LOS ANGELES TO PERMIT VITAL PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC
|
|
Description:
GAIL SCHWARTZ CONTACTED CMMR. OHANIAN ON 10/26/92. RE: CPUC SHOULD AFFIRATIVE
LY AUTHORIZE COMPETITIN FOR THOSE SERVICE WHICH ARE CATEGORIZED IN CATEGORY II
BY EXPANDING THE CERTIFICATED AUTHORITY OF THOSE CARRIERS ALREALY AUTHORIZED TO
PROVIDE LIMITED INTRALATA SERVICES
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIA-
|
|
Description:
THOMAS KEANE, PRES., JULIA RUSSO, EXEC DIR., OF ABOVE AND MARTIN MATTES, COUNSE
L FOR CPA, CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER ON 10/26/92 IN SF. THE CPA REPS. DISCUSSED
THEIR CONCERNS ABOUT PROPOSALS FOR REDUCTIONS IN EXCHANGE CARRIER TOLL RATES,
FOR REDUCTIONS IN PBX TRUNK RATES..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
JOHN GAMBOA & ROBERT GNAIZDA CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 10/26/92. RE: DISCUSSED
THE NEED FOR MINORITY INVOLVEMENT, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MICHAEL MILLER CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 10/26/92. RE: PACBELL'S INTERNTION TO
FILE AN APPLIAITON REQUESTING EXPEDITED MODIFICATION OF THE PHASE I NRF DECISI
ON, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL/PACIFIC TELESIS G
|
|
Description:
SAM GINN & PHILLIP J. QUIGLEY CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 10/26/92. RE: FORTHCOM
ING DECISION ON IRD
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC
|
|
Description:
GAIL SCHWARTZ CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 10/23/92. RE: THAT CPUC SHOULD AFFIRMA
TIVELY AUTHORIZE COMPETITION FOR THOSE SERVICE WHICH ARE CATEGORIZED IN CATEGOR
Y II BY EXPANDING THE CERTIFICATED AUTHORITY OF THOSE CARRIERS ALREADY AUTHORIZ
ED TO PROVIDE LIMITED INTRALATA SERVICES
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS, INC
|
|
Description:
GAIL SCHWARTZ CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 10/26/92. RE: CPUC SHOULD AFFIRATIVE
LY AUTHORIZE COMPETITIN FOR THOSE SERVICE WHICH ARE CATEGORIZED IN CATEGORY II
BY EXPANDING THE CERTIFICATED AUTHORITY OF THOSE CARRIERS ALREALY AUTHORIZED TO
PROVIDE LIMITED INTRALATA SERVICES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF THAYER-DRA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MICHAEL MILLER CONTACTED CMR. OHANIAN ON 10/21/92. RE: PACBELL'S INTENTION TO F
ILE AN APPLICATION REQUESTING EXPEDITED MODIFICATION OF THE PHASE I NRF DECISIO
N, ETC (SECOND MEETING WITH CMR. SHUMWAY ON THE SAME DAY)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 23, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/STAFF/PUC/DRA
|
|
Description:
NORMAN LOW AND JOHN CHAN OF DRA, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO COMR SHU
MWAY ON 10/22/92 IN SF. ALSO PRESENT WERE HELEN MICKIEWICZ & RUFUS THAYER, STAF
F COUNSEL, DRA. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED & IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. THE DISC
USSION CONCERNED DRA'S POSITION AS STATED IN ITS IRD BRIEF. ISSUES DISCUSSED WE
RE COMPETITION IN THE LATA AS IT NOW EXISTS;...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 22, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 22, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILING OF CPA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
CHARLES R. MILLER, AT&T CALIF. STATE REGULATORY MANAGER, CONTACTED KEVIN
COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR OHANIAN ON 10/16/92 AT PUC. MILLER STATED THAT THE
COMMISSION'S ACCEPTANCE OF THE LEC BLOCKING REQUEST IN IRD WOULD PERPETUATE
CUSTOMER FRUSTRATION AND CONFUSION..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
ANN PONGRACZ, DIR., STATE REGULATORY AFFAIRS, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISO
R TO CMMR SHUMWAY ON 10/16/92 AT PUC. SETH LUBIN, SR. ATTY. FOR SPRINT, WAS
ALSO PRESENT. SPRINT ADDRESSED THE BENEFITS OF UNRESTRICTED INTRALATA COMPETITI
ON AND DISCUSSED THE POSSIBLE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF ADOPTING THE LECS PROPOSALS
FOR CONTINUED BLOCKING..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF MCI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILING OF CENTEX ON 10/19/92
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
CACD/PUC
|
|
Description:
WORKSHOP REPORT; UNIVERSAL SERVICE ISSUES IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY,
FINAL REPORT ON 6/29/92 WORKSHOP
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
RICHARD SEVERY CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER ON 10/19/92 @ PUC. ALSO PRESENT WERE:
JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR FESSLER; AND WILLIAM HARRELSON, OF MCI. WRITTEN
MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE. MCI REPS STATED THAT INTRALATA
TOLL COMPETITION WAS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST. HARRELSON DISCUSSED THE PUC BUILDI
NG BLOCK PROGRAM. MCI DOES NOT OBJECT TO..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
JULIA RUSSO, EXEC.DIR.OF CPA; MARTIN MATTES, COUNSEL TO CPA CONTACTED PHEBE GRE
ENWOOD AND RICHARD SMITH SDVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY; AND KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR
TO CMMR. OHANIAN ON 10/16/92 IN S.F. MATTES PRESENTED CPA'S CONCERN ABOUTN THE
POSSIBLE EFFECT OF TOLL PRICING FLEXIBILITY UPON THE CEILINGS APPLICABE TO PRIV
ATE PAYPHONE PROVIDERS' PRICING OF COIN-PAID TOLL CALLS. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE FILING BY PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY LATINO ISSURES FORUM
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCEKT/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILING OF CENTEX
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
WALTER MCGEE CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 10/15/92. OTHERS PRESENT WERE JOE DEULL
OA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER; TERRY MURRAY CONSULTANT TO CENTEX; JEFFREY BLUMEN
FELD, ATTY FOR CENTEX. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE
THE DISCUSSION COVERED CENTEX'S RATE DESIGN APPROACH INCLUDING: ENSURING THAT
THE MONOPOLY RATES BE SET TO COVER LONG RUN INCREMENTAL COSTS; ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
EDITH ADAME AND MARK SAVAGE CONTACTED CMMR. OHANIAN ON 10/13/92. RE: FUNDAMENTA
L CHANGES IN THE TECHNOLOGY AN DSTRUCTURE OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY, E
TC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LESTER D. TAYLOR CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR.SHUMWAY ON 10/14/92
GERALD L. OLIVER OF PACIFIC BELL. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO
THE NOTICE. TAYLOR EXPLAINED HOW THE TOLL PRICE ELASTICITY VAIRES DIRECTLY WIT
H DISTANCE, NOT WITH PRICE. HE DESCRIBED THE PROCESS BY WHICH PROF. HAUSMAN HA
D CALCULATED HIS ESTIMATES OF TOLL PRICE ELASTICITY DURING THE HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
STEPHEN BOWEN CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 10/5/92. OTHERS PRESENT WERE AUDRIE KRA
USE, THOMAS LONG, REGINA COSTA, OF TURN; MARLIN ARD AND J. GUELDNER OF PACBELL;
TIM MCCALLION OF GTE; BILL HARRELSON OF MCI; SETH LUBIN AND ANN PONGRACZ OF SPR
INT; DRUV KHANNA OF MCCAW CELLULAR; LIONEL WILSON, HELEN MICKIEWCZ OF DRA; JOE
FABER OF CBCH; BOWEN SAID THAT CALIFORNIA CONSUEMRS WOULD BENEFIT FROM.., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICES OF EX PARTE BY MCI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI & LEE/ ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NO EX PARTE CONTACT AFTER 12/8/92; EN BANC SET FOR 12/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
RICHARD SEVERY CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 10/8/92 & 10/13/92. RE: MCI'S POSIT
IONS ON IRD, WRITTEN MATERIAL ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC
|
|
Description:
RICHARD SEVERY CONTACTED CMMR. OHANIAN ON 10/13/92. RE: MCI RESPONDING TO CMMR.
OHANIAN'S QUESTIONS, STATED THAT SOME LEVEL OF LOCAL EXCHANGE RATE INCREASES M
AY BE JUSTIFIED BASED ON COST AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY CONSIDERATIONS, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PROF. JERRY HAUSMAN FOR PAC BELL, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO COMR SH
UMWAY ON 10/8/92 IN SF. OTHERS PRESENT - GERALD L. OLIVER & LYNN MOWERY, OF PAC
BELL AND RICHARD SMITH, CACD. HAUSMAN DISCUSSED TOLL ELASTICITY ISSUES. HE EXPL
AINED WHY THE CORRECT ELASTICITY VALUE IS IMPORTANT TO REVENUE NEUTRAL RATE
REBALANCING..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILING OF CENTEX ON 10/9/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF C
|
|
Description:
TO MATTERS ENUMERATED IN THE COMMON BRIEFING OUTLINE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
(LATE-FILED) TIM MCCALLION, DIR-REVENUE & EARNINGS MANAGEMENT, CONTACTED CMMR.
ECKERT ON 10/5/92 AT CPUC. OTHERS WERE PRESENT-SEE NOTICE. MCCALLION ADDRESSED
THE ISSUE OF INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION,...ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
GERALD L. OLIVER, DIR-COMPETITION PROCEEDINGS, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVIS
OR TO COMR SHUMWAY ON 10/7/92 AT PUC. RICHARD L. SCHOLL AND LYNN MOWERY, OF PAC
BELL WERE ALSO PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED AND IS ATTACHED TO NOTICE.
SCHOLL COMPARED DIRECT EMBEDDED COST AND LONG RUN INCREMENTAL COST THEORIES &
COMPARED PAC BELL'S LRIC TO OTHER PARTIES' METHODOLOGIES..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
(LATE-FILED) MARLIN ARD, SR ATTY., CONTACTED CMMR ECKERT ON 10/5/92 AT PUC. OTH
ERS WERE PRESENT-SEE NOTICE FOR LISTING. (WRITTEN MATERIAL USED & ATTACHED TO
NOTICE) THE PAC BELL REPS COVERED THE FOLLOWING TOPICS; REVENUE NEUTRALITY, EFF
ECT OF RATE CHANGES ON THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE, CARRIER COMMON LI
NE ELIMINATION, BASIC RATE INCREASES, LONG RUN INCREMENTAL COST..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHILIP QUIGLEY, PRES., CONTACTED CMMRS FESSLER & OHANIAN ON 10/7/92 AT PUC. JOH
N A. GUELDNER, VP, PAC BELL; JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR FESSLER; AND KEVIN
COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR OHANIAN WERE ALSO PRESENT.(WRITTEN MATERIAL WAS USED
AND IS ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE) QUIGLEY EXPLAINED HOW PAC BELL'S IRD PROPOSAL BA
LANCES THE NEED FOR LOWER TOLL RATES AND SUBSIDY ELIMINATION WHILE..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TIM MCCALLION, DIR-REVENUE & EARNINGS MANAGEMENT, CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD,
ADVISOR TO CMMR SHUMWAY; RICHARD SMITH, ACTING ADVISOR TO CMMR SHUMWAY; AND
KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR OHANIAN ON 10/8/92 AT PUC. ALSO PRESENT WERE
JUDITH ENDJEAN, AND DR. GREGORY M. DUNCAN, BOTH OF GTEC. THE REPS. REVIEWED TOL
L PRICE ELASTICITY ISSUES WHICH INCLUDED A RESPONSE ...., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
(AUGMENTATION OF EXP ON CALENDAR OF 10/9/92)
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC_
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILING OF GTE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
RICHARD BROMLEY, VP, CONTACTED COMR OHANIAN ON 10/8/92 @ PUC. OTHERS PRESENT-KE
VIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO COMR OHANIAN; RANDOLPH DEUTSCH, SR. ATTY.; & CHARLES M
ILLER, STATE REGULATORY MNGR, BOTH OF AT&T. (WRITTEN MATERIAL USED-ATTACHED TO
NOTICE) DEUTSCH URGED PUC APPROVAL OF UNRESTRICTED 10XXX INTRALATA CALLING, INC
LUDING CALLS WITHIN LOCAL, ZUM AND EAS CALLING AREAS. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
CARRINGTON F. PHILLIP CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 10/6/92. RE: THE INADEQUACY OF
THE CURRENT COSTING METHODOLOGIES IN ALLOCATION COSTS TO FUTURE SERVICES, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
KEITH KRAMER CONTACTED CMMR. OHANIAN ON 10/7/92. RE: IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN
PROPOSAL, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
(AUGMENTATION OF EXP ON CALENDAR OF 10/9/92)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
STEPHEN BOWEN, CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 10/5/92 AT 10:30. OTHERS PRESENT WERE
WALTER MCGEE OF CENTEX; PETER O'DONNELL ADVISOR TO CMMR. ECKERT; JOE DEULLOA AD
VISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER; PREPRESENTATIVE OF PACBELL, MCI,AT&T, ETC. BOWEN
SUGGESTED THAT CUSTOMERS WOULD BENEFIT MOST FROM A INFRASTRUCTURE OF INTE
RCONNECTED NETWORKS OF A NUMBER OF PROVIDERS AND THAT THE COMMR SHOULD.., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF TURN
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF TURN
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICAITONS, INC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY DRA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TIM MCCALLION, OF GTE CONTACTED CMMR ECKERT ON 10/5/92 AT THE CPUC. OTHERS PRES
ENT WERE KEITH KRAMER OF GTE; PETER O'DONNELL, ADVISOR TO CMMR. ECKERT; JOSEPH
DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER; RE: ISSUE OF THE INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION
AND THE NEED TO REDUCE TOLL RATES AND TO INCREASE BASIC RATES CLOSER TO THE
ACTUAL COST OF PROVIDING SERVICE. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
KEITH KRAMER OF GTE CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER ON 10/6/92 AT THE CPUC. OTHERS PRESE
NT WERE TIM MCCALLION OF GTE; JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER; THE
COMMUNICATION DEALT WITH GTEC'S PROPOSAL. GTEC REVIEWED THE "OVERVIEW OF THE IS
SUES, CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITION, AND PRICE ELASTICITIES" OUTLINED IN THE ATTA
CHED MATERIALA DN DISCUSSED QUESTIONS RELATING TO NON-TRAFFIC SENSITIVE COST...
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARLIN D. ARD, SR. ATTY., CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 10/5/92 AT PUC. SEE COPY OF
NOTICE FOR OTHERS PRESENT. PAC BELL STRESSED THAT PROPOSALS FOR UNREASONABLE EL
ASTICITY ESTIMATES, THE ELIMINATION OF THE CCL, THE FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE COMPET
ITIVE LOSS AS AN OFFSET TO TOLL STIMULATION, AND THE FAILURE OF DRA TO PERMIT
SHIFTED REVENUES FOR NECESSARY TOLL REDUCTIONS..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
(AUGMENTATION REQUIRED) THOMAS LONG, STAFF ATTY., CONTACTED COMR ECKERT ON 10/5
/92 AT PUC. SEE NOTICE FOR LIST OF OTHERS PRESENT. LONG EXPLAINED THAT THE LECS
' RATE DESIGNS WILL FRUSTRATE THE COMMISSSION'S PROGRESS TOWARD ACHIEVING UNIVE
RSAL SERVICE AND THAT THE RATE DESINGS OF PAC BELL AND GTEC WOULD INCREASE
BASIC RESIDENTIAL RATES APPROX. 60% AND WOULD DECREASE TELEPHONE..., ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
AUDRIE KRAUSE, EXEC. DIR, CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER ON 10/6/92 AT PUC. THOMAS LONG
, TURN STAFF ATTY. & JOE DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR FESSLER WERE ALSO PRESENT. US
ING THE PIE CHARTS PREPARED BY PAC BELL, THE TURN REPS. SHOWED THAT, EVEN THOUG
H IRD WILL (IN THEORY) BE REVENUE NEUTRAL TO PAC BELL, PAC BELL'S RATE DESIGN
WOULD CAUSE A MASSIVE SHIFT OF THE REVENUE BURDEN TO RESIDENTIAL..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
ANN PONGRACZ, DIR, STATE REGULATORY AFFAIRS DEPT., CONTACTED CMMR ECKERT ON 10/
5/92 AT PUC. (SEE NOTICE FOR OTHERS PRESENT) SPRINT ARGUED FOR UNRESTRICTED
INTRALATA COMPETITION, SAYING IT WILL PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE PROVIDERS TO EXPAND &
UPGRADE CALIFORNIA'S TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE. SPRINT SUPPORTED DRA'S
PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE THE CCLC & TO IMPLEMENT AN ALL-END-USER SURCHARGE...,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
ANN PONGRACZ, DIR, STATE REGULATORY AFFAIRS DEPT., CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER ON 10
/7/92 AT PUC. JOE DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR FESSLER WAS ALSO PRESENT. SPRINT
ARGUED FOR UNSTRICTED INTRALATA COMPETITION AND STATED THAT IT'S COMPATIBLE WIT
H CONTINUING PROTECTION OF UNIVERSAL SERVICE. SPRINT ALSO URGED THAT LECS S/B
PREVENTED FROM (1) INFLATING THEIR REVENUE REQUIREMENT AND..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS,
|
|
Description:
DHRUV KHANNA & OTHERS CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 10/5/92. RE: MCCAW'S OPPOSITION
TO DRA'S END USER SURCHARGE PROPOSAL, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
DHRUV KHANNA & OTHERS CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 10/5/92. RE: EMPHASIZED THAT TC
G PROVIDES ITS OWN NETWORK WHICH PROVIDES CUSTOMER BENEFITS SUCH AS REDUNDANCY,
ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF CBCHA/COUNTY OF L.A.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
WILSON/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
LIONEL B. WILSON & OTHERS CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 10/5/92. RE: DRA ARGUED THA
T THIER RATE DESIGN PROPOSALS STRIKE A BALANCE BETWEEN COMPELLING INTERESTS GIV
EN THE NEED TO ESTABLISH RATES ON A REVENUE REQUIREMENT NEUTRALITY BASIS AND EN
COURAGE USED OF THE PUBLIC SWITCHED NETWORK, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH S. FABER, COUNSEL, CONTACTED CMMR ECKERT ON 10/5/92 @ PUC. MANY OTHERS W
ERE PRESENT (SEE NOTICE). CBCHA/COUNTY OF LA ARGUED THAT TOLL RATE DECREASES PR
OPOSED BY THE LECS ARE TOO GREAT AND WILL BE MORE THAN OFF-SET BY THE CORRESPON
DING RATE INCREASE IN OTHER SERVICES, RESULTING IN A NET RATE INCREAE FOR
RATEPAYERS..., ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH S. FABER, COUNSEL, CONTACTED CMMR ECKERT ON 10/5/92 @ PUC. MANY OTHERS W
ERE PRESENT (SEE NOTICE). CBCHA/COUNTY OF LA ARGUED THAT TOLL RATE DECREASES PR
OPOSED BY THE LECS ARE TOO GREAT AND WILL BE MORE THAN OFF-SET BY THE CORRESPON
DING RATE INCREASE IN OTHER SERVICES, RESULTING IN A NET RATE INCREAE FOR
RATEPAYERS..., ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATION OF CALIFORN
|
|
Description:
RANDOLPH DEUTSCH AND OTHERS CONTACTED CMMR. ECKERT ON 10/5/92. RE: RECOMMENDATI
ONS: APPROVE UNRESTRICTED 10XXX0+-AND 10XXX1+ CALLING; ADOPT LRIC AS THE COST S
TANDARD; ADOPT AT&T 'S LECT TOLL PRICE FLOORS INCLUDING IMPUTATION OF ACCESS UN
SED Y LEC; ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE & COUNTY OF L.A.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH FABER CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER ON 10/2/92. RE: LECS PROPOSALS, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JANEEN K. FISHER CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 9/29/29. RE: SWITCHED ACCESS AND
PRESENTED PACBELL'S SWITCHED ACCESS PROPOSAL, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/STAFF/PUC/DRA
|
|
Description:
RUFUS THAYER CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER ON 10/2/92 @ PUC. OTHERS PRESENT-NORMAN LOW
& JOHN CHAN, DRA; HELEN MICKIEWICZ, STAFF COUNSEL & JOE DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO COM
R FESSLER. WRITTEN MATERIALS USED (ATTACHED). DRA SUMMARIZED ITS PROPOSALS MADE
IN ITS OPENING BRIEF. THESE INCLUDED A DISCUSSION OF COMPETITION WITH THE LATA,
THE REQUIREMENT OF REVENUE NEUTRALITY AS IT APPLIES TO THE LECS UNDER..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA ON 9/28/92. RE: PACBELL'S POSITION ON ACTII
ONS THE CPUC SHOULD TAKIE IN AN IRD ORDER, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PUBLIC ADVOCATES
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF TURN
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
PUBLIC ADVOCATES
|
|
Description:
CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO COMR FESSLER, ON 9/23/92 AT THE OFFICE OF THE
BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO. THE CONTACT OCCURRED IN THE CONTEXT OF A MEET
ING OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SF CALLED TO CONSIDER A
MOTION THAT THE BAR ASSOCIATION SEND AN AMICUS LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED W/CPUC ON 9/18/92. ROBERT GNAIZDA, REPRESENTING..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 25, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 25, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
AUDRIE KRAUSE, EXEC DIR, CONTACTED COMR OHANIAN ON 9/22/92 AT PUC. OTHERS PRESE
NT-KEVIN COUGHLIN, ADVISOR TO COMR OHANIAN; THOMAS LONG AND REGINA COSTA, BOTH
OF TURN. TURN REPS EXPLAINED THAT THE RECORD IN IRD DOES NOT SUPPORT THE BASIC
EXCHANGE RATE INCREASES SOUGHT BY PACIFIC BELL AND GTEC. THE REPS EXPLAINED THA
T THE LEC'S HAD COMPLETELY FAILED TO SUPPORT THEIR CLAIM THAT RESIDENTIAL..,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 9/23/92. RE: IRD MUST BE REVENUE NEU
TRAL, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTING MOTION OF L.A. CELLULAR REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE COMMENTS LATE
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
September 22, 1992
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE OPENING BRIEF; OPENING BRIEF RE END USER SURCHARGE PROPO
SED ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
(OPENING9
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REJECTION LETTER TO MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, RE: REPLY TO AT&TS PET. FOR MOD. OF
D89-10-031 (RETURNED)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN.
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
(CONCURRENT OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
(OPENING); IN IRD
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
(OPENING) - ON IRD ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
(OPENING) - ON IRD ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL;
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY THE
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/WILSON/MICKIEWICZ/STAFF
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
(OPENING); AND ALL OTHER FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES: PHASEIII-IMPLEMENTATION
RATE DESIGN
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
(CONCURRENT OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
(POST-HEARING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF CALI
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
METROPOLITAN FIBER SYSTEMS OF
|
|
Description:
(INITIAL)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
INTELLICALL, INC.
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ALARM ASSN.
|
|
Description:
(OPENING); ON ORD-PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATION OF CALIFORN
|
|
Description:
OPENING
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
(POST-HEARING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CELLULAR CARRIERS ASSN. OF CAL
|
|
Description:
(OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
RICE, MARYBETH A.INTERESTED PA
|
|
Description:
(CONCURRENT OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I.FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATAINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
September 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
MURRAY, MICHAEL. INTERESTED PA
|
|
Description:
(CONCURRENT OPENING)
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REJECTION LETTER TO SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF CALIFORNIA; RE: RESPONSE OF
SUROC TO MATERS ENUMERATED IN THE COMMON BRIEFING OUTLINE
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEE/AMAROLI/ALJS/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION'S 7/24/92 MOTION; DENIES PEOPLE'S TELEPH
ONE COMPANY'S REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE; UPDATES SERVICE LIST
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REJECTION LETTER TO PACIFIC BELL. RE: MOTION TO ACCEPT THE OPPOSITION; OPPOSITI
ON ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILING OF CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
September 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FROM ALJ-WONG TO ALJ-REED ALJ ASSIGNED TO ORDER GRANTING REHEARING
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY CALIFORNIA BANKER CLEARING HOUSE ASSN/COUNTY OF L.A.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
WALTER MCGEE, ASST. VP. CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR. SHUMWAY ON
9/9/92 IN S.F., OTHERS PRESENT WERE TERRY MURRAY, CONSULTANT TO CENTEX, ET AL.
CENTEX URGED THE COMM. TO ADOPT A PRINCIPLE EMPOWERING CONSUMERS BY GIVING THEM
THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHICH INTRALATA SERVICES (OFFERED BY LECS AND OTHERS) BEST
MEET THEIR NEEDS. CENTEX POINTED OUT THAT AN EFFECTIVE INTRALATA MARKET..,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKER CLEARING HOU
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH S. FABER CONTACTED CMMR. OHANIAN ON 9/9/92. RE: WHETHER LECS' PROPOSALS
FOR RATE CHANGES GO BEYOND THOSE NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE INTROCUTION OF IN
TRALATA TOLL COMPETITION, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKER CLEARING HOU
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH S. FABER CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 9/9/92. RE: WHETHER LECS' PROPOSALS
FOR RATE CHANGES GO BEYOND THOSE NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE INTROCUTION OF IN
TRALATA TOLL COMPETITION, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
September 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
PEOPLES TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC
|
|
Description:
TO FILE A REPLY TO OPPOSITION OF PACBELL TO REQUEST OF PEOPLE TO PARTICIPATE
WITHOUT INTERVENTION; REPLY ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
SHUMWAY/COMMR/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON THE MOTION FOR REVIEW OF ALJ'S RULING EXCLUDING LEC COST STUDIES FROM THE RE
CORD BY CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC; MOTION WILL BE ADDRESSED IN A SUBSEQUENT DE
CISION IN THIS PROCEEDING
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THOMAS J. BALLO CONTACTED CMMR. SHUMWAY ON 9/3/92. RE: HIS LETTER URGED CMMR. S
HUWAY TO DENY CENTAX'S SUGGETION THAT PARTIES BE PERMITTED TO BRIEF THE WORKPAP
ERS, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
September 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIV.
|
|
Description:
SUBMITTAL, VOLUME 219
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO PACBELL'S RESPONSE TO AT&T'S PROTEST OF PACBELL'S PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-
031 AND AT&T'S PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
MATCHETT/STAFF/PUC/DRA
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S AND PACBELL'S PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
TO THE PROTEST OF THE CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION AND THE COU
NTY OF LA TO ITS PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO REQUEST OF PEOPLES TELEPHONE CO, INC. TO PARTICIPATE WITHOUT INTERVENTION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE-FILED RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D89-10-031 OF
AT&T, TO AT&T'S PROTEST OF PACBELL'S PETITION TO MODIFICATION OF D89-10-031, A
ND TO PROTEST OF THE CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSN AND THE COUNTY OF L
.A. TO PACBELL'S AND GTEC'S PET. TO MODIFY D89-11-031; RESPONSE AND DECLARATION
OF ANTHONY A.J. 'TONY' DITIRRO ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE PROTESTS OF AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. AND CALIFORNIA
BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION/COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO PAC BELL'S PETITION
TO MODIFY D89-10-031, AND PROTEST TO AT&T'S PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/STAFF/PUC/DRA
|
|
Description:
NORMAN LOW, DRA, CONTACTED ALJ AMAROLI ON 8/26/92 IN SF. KELLY BOYD, JOHN CHAN,
DRA STAFF; RUFUS G. THAYER, DRA STAFF COUNSEL; AND JUDITH ENDEJAN, ATTORNEY FOR
GTEC, WERE ALSO PRESENT. DRA STAFF INDICATED THEIR CONCERN TO ALJ AMAROLI THAT
COMMENTS THEY BELIEVED THAT GTEC WAS ABOUT TO FILE REGARDING DRA'S REVS'D TABLE
1.2 TO EXHIBIT 582 WOULD BE A PROTEST BASED UPON A MISUNDERTANDING..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
JUDITH A. ENDEJAN CONTACTED BY ALJ AMAROLI BY PHONE ON 8/26/92. RE: GTE NOT WIL
LING TO WAIVE ITS OBJECTION TO DRA'S ACTION IN REVISING ITS BUSINESS LINE VOLUM
E, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILING OF GTEC ON 8/25/92
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEE/AMAROLI/ALJS/PUC
|
|
Description:
PROHIBITING FURTHER EX PARTE CONTACTS IN THESE PROCEEDINGS AFTER TUESDAY,
10/27/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEUTZA/CACD/PUC
|
|
Description:
NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: 1991 PROCEDURAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
DONALD EACHUS, REVENUE & EARNINGS STAFF MANAGER OF GTE CONTACTED ALJ AMAROLI ON
8/25/92 IN S.F. BY PHONE; OTHER PRESENT WAS DAVE SKELTON, DISTRICT MANAGER OF
GTEC; GTEC REPRESENTATIVES GAVE ALJ AMAROLI INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR AUTOMATED
TESTING SYSTEM CAPABILITIES. THEY STATED THAT THE SYSTEM..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILED BY CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY DRA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
(LATE FILED) WALTER MCGEE, ASSISTANT VP OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, CENTEX CONTACTED
PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO CMMR SHUMWAY ON 8/17/92 IN S.F. OTHERS PRESENT WERE
TERRY MURRAY, CONSULTANT TO CENTES; STEPHEN BOWEN, COUNSEL TO CENTEX. REPRESEN
TATIVES OF CENTEX REQUESTED GREENWOOD'S ADVICE & ASSISTANCE IN ARRANGING A MEET
ING WITH CMMR SHUMWAY TO PRESENT THEIR VIEWS. THEY INQUIRED ABOUT..., ECT.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD ON 8/19/92. RE: KEY POINTS OF DRA'S IMPLEMENTATION RA
TE DESIGN (IRD) PROPOSALS, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D89-10-031 OF AT&T AND TO AT&T'S PROTEST OF
PACBELL'S PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
FESSLER/COMMISSIONER/PUC
|
|
Description:
ORDERING AN INVESTIGATION OF POSSIBLE EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BY PAC BELL'S SAM
GINN AND A SECOND INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT SHUMWAY USED ANY
COMMISSION RESOURCES (OFFICES, OR PERSONNEL) FOR HIS 7/8/92 U.S. ENGLISH PRESS
CONFERENCE HELD IN THE STATE BLDG. COURTYARD; REPRIMANDS EDITH ADAME & MARK SAV
AGE FOR THEIR REQUEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT COMR SHUMWAY'S POSITIONS..ETC
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S AND GTEC'S PETITIONS TO MODIFY D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S AND GTEC'S PETITIONS TO MODIFY D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
PEOPLES TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC
|
|
Description:
TO PARTICIPATE WITHOUT INTERVENTION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
PEOPLES TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW PORTIONS OF
THE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES KEANE AND RENARD ADDRESSING OPERATOR-MINUS COMPETITI
ON
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/LEE/ALJS/PUC
|
|
Description:
THAT I87-11-033 WILL BE REOPENED FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF HEARING THE SURREBU
TTAL TESTIMONY OF DR. MARK BRYANT ON BEHALF OF MCI; MCI SHALL STRIKE SPECIFIC
PARTS OF THE TESTIMONY; PAC BELL'S REQUEST FOR PRESENTATION OF JERRY HAUSMAN'S
REBUTTAL TESTIMONY IS DENIED; HEARING WILL BE HELD 8/20/92
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
August 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S PETITION TO MODIFY D.89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF TURN
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO PACIFIC BELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE PROPOSED SURREBUTTAL TESTI
MONY OF DR. BRYANT ON BEHALF OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE MCI'S SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO PAIFIC BELL'S MOITON TO STRIKE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
AUDRIE KRAUSE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO COMR FESSL
ER, ON 8/6/92 IN SAN FRANCISCO. KRAUSE STATED THAT TURN HAD NO OBJECTION TO
THE COMMISSION'S PLANNED RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FILED 7/29/92 BY PUBLIC
ADVOCATES, INC. AND LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF DRA-THAYER
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MARLIN D. ARD, ATTY., CONTACTED ALJ AMAROLI ON 8/6/92 IN SF. ARD PROPOSED MODIF
ICATION TO THE WORDING PROPOSED IN PAC BELL'S 8/4/92 LETTER TO ALJ AMAROLI (ATT
ACHED). IN THE LETTER, ARD ADDS LANGUAGE TO THE NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT MAKING
CLEAR THAT SIGNING THE AGREEMENT DOES NOT FORECLOSE A PERSON FROM ASSISTING HIS
OR HER EMPLOYER WITH IRD AS LONG AS PROTECTED MATERIAL IS NOT...,ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/STAFF/PUC/DRA
|
|
Description:
THAYER CONTACTED KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO COMR OHANIAN, ON 8/6/92 IN SF. NORM
AN LOW & JOHN CHAN, DRA; HELEN MICKIEWCZ, DRA STAFF COUNSEL; JOSEPH DEULLOA, AD
VISOR TO COMR FESSLER; PHEBE GREENWOOD, ADVISOR TO COMR SHUMWAY; DIRK PALOUTZIA
N & VALERIE MCSWAIN, SUMMER INTERNS WERE ALSO PRESENT. DRA REPS. REVIEWED THE M
AIN POINTS (ATTACHED) OF THEIR PROPOSAL..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI & LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
CLARIFYING PRIOR RULING ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO PACIFIC BELL'S MOTION TO PERMIT PROFESSOR HAUSMAN'S PREVIOUSLY
STICKEN REBUTTAL TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
AUDRIE KRAUSE/TURN CONTACTED ALJ GEORGE AMAROLI ON 8/5/92 IN SAN FRANCISCO RE:
KRAUSE INFORMED ALJ AMAROLI BY LETTER (ATTACHED) THAT TURN HAD SUBMITTED AP
PROXIMATELY 3000 PETITIONS REQUESTING THAT PUC GIVE FULL CONSIDERATION TO TURN'
S PROPOSALS IN THE IRD PHASE OF THE ALTERNATIVE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MIKE MILLER, REG VP, CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR FESSLER ON 7/31/92
IN SF. MILLER INDICATED THAT PACIFIC HAD RECEIVED A 7/29/92 "MOTION BY LATINO I
SSUES FORUM AND THE AMERICAN G.I. FORUM AND THAT THE PUC INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE A
DDITIONAL EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BY PAC BELL'S SAM GINN", AND PLANNED TO FILE
A RESPONSE THAT WOULD POINT OUT THAT THE ONLY MATTER DISCUSSED..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE OF CBCHA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
SHUMWAY/COMR/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES THE "MOTION OF LATINO ISSUES FORUM AND THE AMERICAN G.I. FORUM THAT COMR
SHUMWAY DISCLOSE HIS ROLE WITH U.S. ENGLISH DUE TO APPEARANCES OF IMPROPRIETY
OR BIAS" DATED 6/9/92
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEE & AMAROLI/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
RESPONSE TO PACIFIC BELL'S MOTION TO STRIKE SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF DR. BRYANT
FOR MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP. OR ALTERNATIVELY TO PRESENT ADDITIONAL TESTIMO
NY DUE 8/10/92
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEE & AMAROLI/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
CLARIFIES PRIOR RULING REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PREPARED TESTIMONY & BRIEFS ON
ELECTRONIC FORMAL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION BY LATINO ISSUES FORUM AND THE AMERICAN G.I. FORUM THAT THE PUC
INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BY PACIFIC BELL'S SAM
GINN
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH S. FABER, COUNSEL, CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR FESSLER ON
8/3/92 IN SF. OTHERS PRESENT-DR. LEE SELWYN, PRES OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY,
INC.; KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR OHANIAN AND PETER O'DONNELL, ADVISOR TO
CMMR ECKERT. FABER & SELWYN PROVIDED A COPY OF SELWYN'S SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY
AND EXHIBIT(ATTACHED)AND DISCUSSED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ELASTICITY EST., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
JOSEPH S. FABER, COUNSEL, CONTACTED JOSEPH DEULLOA, ADVISOR TO CMMR FESSLER ON
8/3/92 IN SF. OTHERS PRESENT-DR. LEE SELWYN, PRES OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY,
INC.; KEVIN COUGHLAN, ADVISOR TO CMMR OHANIAN AND PETER O'DONNELL, ADVISOR TO
CMMR ECKERT. FABER & SELWYN PROVIDED A COPY OF SELWYN'S SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY
AND EXHIBIT(ATTACHED)AND DISCUSSED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ELASTICITY EST., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PM OF PAC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PM OF GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT INC.'S APPEAL OF ALJ RULING EXCLUDING EXHIBITS 859A,
860A, AND 861A FROM THE RECORD
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO THE APPEAL BY CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC. OF THE ALJ'S RULING EXCLUDING LEC
COST STUDIES FROM THE RECORD
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC'S APPEAL OF THE ALJ'S RULING EXCLUDING THE COST
STUDIES FROM THE RECORD
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE THE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF DR. BRYANT ON BEHALF OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATI
ONS CORPORATION; ALTERNATIVELY; TO PRESENT ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY OF PROFESSOR
HAUSMAN; REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
KEITH KRAMER CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA ON 8/3/92. RE: IRD ASSUMPTIONS, GOALS, PROPO
SED RATES FOR SELECTED SERVICES, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OF D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OF D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM/AMERICAN G
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC INVESTIGATE ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER SHUMWAY'S ANTI-HISPANIC PRESS CONFER
ENCE IN PUC'S COURTYARD WITH PUC STAFF
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
SUPPORT OF MOTION OF CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM/AMERICAN G
|
|
Description:
THAT PUC INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BY PACBELL'S S
AM GINN
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
SUBMITTAL; VOLUME 218
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
TO CENTEX INC'S APPEAL OF ALJ RULING EXCLUDING COST STUDIES FROM THE RECORDS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
TO CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC'S APPEAL OF ALJ RULING EXCLUDING LEC COST STUDIES
FROM THE RECORD
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEE/AMAROLI/ALJS/PUC
|
|
Description:
ADOPTING THE COMMON BRIEFING OUTLINE FOR I87-11-033, PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
TO CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC'S APPEAL OF ALJ RULING EXCLUDING LEC COST STUDIES
FROM THE RECORD
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW PORTIONS OF THE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES KEANE AND RENARD A
DDRESSING "OPERATOR-MINUS" COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 23, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
RICHARD BROMLEY/AT&T CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER, ECKERT, OHANIAN & SHUMWAY ON 7/20/
92 IN SAN FRANCISCO RE: INFORMATION & CURRENT STATUS OF LOCAL TRANSPORT
(ATTACHED); AT&T'S COST-EFF ECTIVE ACCESS ARRANGEMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
ROOD/STAFF/PUC/DRA
|
|
Description:
TO THE JOINT PETITION OF PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. FOR A STAY OF
THE BUILDING INDUSTRY NOTIFICATION REQUIREMNTS UNDER THE DEMARCATION SETTLE-
MENT AGREEMENT ADOPTED BY D92-01-023
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT
|
|
Description:
FOR REVIEW OF ALJ LEE'S RULING EXCLUDING LEC COST STUDIES FROM THE RECORD
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXP PARTE BY PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
MARTIN MATES CONTACTED COMRS. FESSLER, ECKERT OHANIAN & SHUMWAY. RE: 6/15/92 TE
LEPHONY ARTICLE 'MARKET-BASED PUBLIC POLICY', ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THOMAS BALLO/PACBELL CONTACTED ALJS AMAROLI & LEE ON 7/7/92, IN S.F. BY LETTER
RE: BALLO STATES THAT PACBELL HAS DETERMINED THAT NO CHANGES TO ITS PROPOSED IR
D RATE DESIGN ARE REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THE COMMISSION'S ADOPTION OF THE SETT
LEMENT AGREEMENT AND THEREFORE REVISIONS WILL NOT BE SUBMITTED. BALLO ADDS THAT
CONTEMPLATED RATE CHANGES WILL BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THE DECISION'S TIME FRAME
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO LP
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE REBUTTAL
RESTIMONY OF RICHARD A. PURKEY ON BEHALF OF SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. AND PACIFIC BELL REGARDING ALJ'S RULING ADOP
TING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/STAFF/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTIONS OF PACIFIC BELL, GTE CALIFORNIA INC.; AND CONTEL CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION TO STRIKE REBUTTAL TESTIMON
Y OF PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI & LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTING THE MOTION OF DRA FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT LIMITED SURREBUTTAL T
ESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI AND LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
THAT DRA MAY OFFER ITS REVISED TABLES AS A LATE FILED EXIBIT NOT LATER THAN 8/
20/92; OBJECTIONS DUE 9/4/92; DRA'S RESPONSE DUE 9/18/92 AND GIVING OTHER DIREC
TIONS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE RE
BUTTAL TESTIMONY OF LUIGI F. PINNA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
WILSON/STAFF/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION OF CP NATIONAL, EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY, AND KERMAN
TELEPHONE CO. TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATION GROUP
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION TO STRIKE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF J. SCOTT BONNEY FILED BY DRA AND PACI
FIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTIONS TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PACIFIC BELL'S REBUTTAL TESTIMONY FILED BY
AT&T, MCI, TURN AND CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
JOINT PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D.92-01-023 BY PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFORN
IA CORP
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO RECONSIDER OR CLARIFY ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES' RULING ADOPTING PROTECTIVE
ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF PACIFIC BELL AND GTE OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO RECONSIDER OR CLARIFY ALJ RULING ADOPTI
NG PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS,
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION BY DRA FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO FILE SURREBUTTAL TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIA-
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE A PORTION OF IRD REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF R.L. SCHOLL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTION OF DRA REBUTTAL TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTION OF DRA REBUTTAL TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTION OF DRA REBUTTAL TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JERRY OLIVER (PACIFIC BELL), JANEEN
FISCHER (PACIFIC BELL) AND LUIGI F. PINNA (GTEC)
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
WILSON/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE THE TESTIMONY OF J. SCOTT BONNEY, TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF RICHARD A. PURKEY SUBMITTED ON
BEHALF OF SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE THE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF J. SCOTT BONNEY SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE FILING OF GTE CALILFORNIA, INC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING ADMITTEDLY VITAL PUBLIC
TESTIMONY DURING THESE EVIDENTIARY PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
(JOINT) OF D.92-01-023, FOR STAY OF THE BUILDING INDUSTRY NOTIFICATION REQUIREM
ENTS UNDER THE DEMARCATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ADOPTED BY D.92-01-023
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
(JOINT) OF D.92-01-023, FOR STAY OF THE BUILDING INDUSTRY NOTIFICATION REQUIREM
ENTS UNDER THE DEMARCATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ADOPTED BY D.92-01-023
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
KEITH KRAMER, AREA VP - REG & GOV'T AFFAIRS, GTEC, CONTACTED COMRS. SHUMWAY,
ECKERT, OHANIAN ON 7/1/92 IN SF. TIM MCCALLION, DIR REVENUE & EARNIGS MGMT,GTE
C, WAS ALSO PRESENT. GTEC REPS. STATED THAT GTEC'S RATE DESIGN PROPOSAL RESULTE
D IN INTRALATA TOLL RATES STILL BEING PRICED WELL ABOVE COST AND THAT LOCAL SER
VICE RATES WOULD STILL BE SUPPORTED BY INTRALATA TOLL RATES, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
MICKIEWICZ/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
FOR OPPORTUNITY TO FILE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY IN RESPONSE TO REPLY TETIMONY OF CEL
LULAR CARRIERS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
P.J. QUIGLEY CONTACTED COMRS. FESSLER, ECKERT, OHANIAN, SHUMWAY ON 6/30/92. RE
'TELEPHONY MAGAZINE' 6/15/92 PAGE 72 ENTITLED 'MARKET-BASED PUBLIC POLICY, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO RECONSIDER OR CLARIFY ALJS' RULING ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE OF PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 29, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA,INC
|
|
Description:
TO HAVE ATTACHMENTS TO LUIGI PINNA'S REBUTTAL TESTIMONY ADMITTED UNDER SEAL; RE
BUTTAL TESTIMONY ATTACHED UNDER SEAL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DAVID P. DISCHER, ATTY FOR PAC BELL, CONTACTED ALJS AMAROLI & LEE ON 6/25/92 IN
SF BY LETTER DATED 6/25/92. DISCHER EXPRESSED RESENTMENT ABOUT MCI'S LETTER DA
TED 6/22/92 ADDRESSED TO ALJ'S AMAROLI & LEE. DISCHER STATES THAT MCI'S LETTER
IS ESSENTIALLY A PREEMTIVE MOTION TO STRIKE PACIFIC'S AS YET UNWRITTEN TESTIMON
Y. PACIFIC OBJECTS TO MCI'S LETTER, BECAUSE IT WILL PREDISPOSE THE ALJS, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ESTABLISHING THE ORDER OF WITNESSES FOR PRESENTATION OF IRD REBUTTAL TESTIMONY,
RESPONSES TO MOTIONS TO STRIKE ARE DUE 7/9/92; REBUTTAL HEARINGS WILL BEGIN
7/13/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 23, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION BY LATINO ISSUES FORUM AND THE AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI & LEE/ALJS/PUC
|
|
Description:
DIRECTING GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED AND PACIFIC BELL TO PROVIDE TWO COPIES O
F THE DATA AND EXPLANATORY MATERIALS REQUESTED THEREIN TO THE ASSIGNED ALJ(S) A
ND ONE COPY UPON EACH PARTY DUE 7/9/92
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
June 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING ADMITTEDLY VITAL PUBLIC TESTIMONY DURING
THESE EVIDENTIARY PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI & LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BY THE MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL ASSOCIATION
, LATINO ISSUES FORUM, AND THE AMERICAN G.I. FORUM THAT THESE MOTIONS WILL BE
ADDRESSED BY THE COMMISSION IN A SUBSEQUENT DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
June 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING ADMITTEDLY VITAL PUBLIC TESTIMONY DURING
THESE EVIDENTIARY PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT INC'S SUBMISSION OF LARGE PORTIONS OF PACBEL'S
COST STUDY WORKPAPERS INTO EVIDENCE AND TO SHORTEN TIME FOR RESPONSE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MORLIN D. ARD CONTACTED ALJ AMAROLI & LEE ON 6/10/92. RE: LETTER SENT TO ROBERT
GNAIZDA AND MARK SAVAGE, APOLOGIZED FOR HIS COMMENTS DURING AN ARGUMENT IN TH E
IRD HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
MOTIONS TO STRIKE REBUTTAL TESTIMONY DUE 7/6/92; RESPONSES TO MOTIONS TO STRIKE
REBUTTAL TESTIMONY DUE 7/8/92; OPENING BRIEFS DUE 60 DAYS AFTER CLOSE OF EH;
REPLY BRIEFS DUE 45 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF OPENING BRIEFS (I.E., EH ENDS 7/24/92
, OPENING BRIEFS DUE 9/21/92 AND CLOSING BRIEFS DUE 11/6/92)
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
June 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES
|
|
Description:
REJECTION LETTER
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
THOMAS R. KEANE AND BRUCE RENARD CONTACTED COMR. SHUMWAY ON 6/8/92. RE: PROPOSA
LS IN THE IRD PROCEEDING TO RAISE LOCAL USAGE RATES DO NOT HELD CUSTOMER-OWNED
PAY TELEPHONE (COPT) PROVIDERS, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
THAT COMMISSIONER SHUMWAY DISCLOSE HIS ROLE WITH U.S. ENGLISH DUE TO
APPEARANCES OF IMPROPRIETY OR BIAS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
THE AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
THAT COMMISSIONER SHUMWAY DISCLOSE HIS ROLE WITH U.S. ENGLISH DUE TO
APPEARANCES OF IMPROPRIETY OR BIAS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I FORUM
|
|
Description:
AND LATINO ISSUES FORUM TO COMPEL FULL DISCLOSURE OF MERVIN FIELD'S STUDY OF
LIFELINE AWARENESS BY PACIFIC BELL CUSTOMERS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO THE HISPANIC PARTIE'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DE
NYING SANCTIONS AGAINST PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
AND THE AMERICAN G.I. FORUM TO COMPEL FULL DISCLOSURE OF MERVIN FIELD'S STUDY
OF LIFELINE AWARENESS BY PACIFIC BELL CUSTOMERS
|
|
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL
|
|
Description:
OF WITHDRAWAL AS INTERVENOR
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
SR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
(AMENDED) FOR FINDING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/LEE/ALJS
|
|
Description:
ADOPTING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CERTAIN CACD DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT,
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TERRY
L. MURRAY ON BEHALF OF CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING SANCTIONS AGAINST PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING SANCTIONS AGAINST PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 28, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING SANCTIONS AGAINST PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
ON THE DRA'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 22, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKERT/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL ON 5/21/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THOMAS J. BELLO WROTE A LETTER ON 5/18/92 TO ALJS AMAROLI & LEE. RE: PACBELL'S
OUTREACH TO MINORITY COMMUNITIES
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL
|
|
Description:
AND OF LATINO ISSUES FORUM AND AMERICAN G.I. FORUM FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE RESPONSE TO DRA MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION HEARINGS, WITH
DECLARATION OF MARK SAVAGE IN SUPPORT THEREOF; RESPONSE ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
AND OF MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN G.I. FORUM FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DRA MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION HEARINGS, WITH DECLARATION OF MARK SAVAGE IN SUPPORT THEREOF;
RESPONSE ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
AND OF MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL ASSOCIATION AND LATINO ISSUES FORUM FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DRA MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION HEARINGS, WITH DECLARATION OF MARK SAVAGE IN SUPPORT THEREOF;
RESPONSE ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE DIRECT TESTIMONY OF YVETTE
SMILEY SMITH FILED 12/16/91
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TERRY L. MURRAY ON BEHALF OF CENT
EX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION BY THE DRA FOR AN ORDER SETTING DATES FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO THE DRA MOTION FOR AN ORDER SETTING RATES FOR ADDITIONAL PPH
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF DRA FOR ADDITIONAL PPH HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING
|
|
Description:
MOTION FILED BY DRA REQUESTING ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
AND OF THE CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION TO MOTION FILED BY DRA
REQUESTING ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL ON 5/13/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 14, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION BY MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL ASSN, LATINO ISSUES R
FORUM, AND AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY GTE CALIFORNIA, INC ON 5/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
NOTICE
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OF WITHDRAWAL OF PETITION TO MODIFY ORDERING PARAGRAPH 6 OF D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MIKE MILLER CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA ON 5/8/92. RE: MOTION BY MEXICAN-AMERICAN POL
ITICAL ASSN ET AL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY LATINO ISSUES FORUM, MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL ASSN, AME
RICAN G.I. FORUM ON 5/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
KEVIN PAYNE CONTACTED JOE DUELLOA ON 5/11/92 BY LETTER. RE: UNIVERSAL LIFELINE
TELEPHONE SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL
|
|
Description:
ROBERT GNAIZDA & MARK SAVAGE RECEIVED LETTER FROM JOE DEULLOA ON 5/8/92. RE:
SACTIONS AGAINST PACBEL FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMM.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
ROBERT GNAIZDA & MARK SAVAGE RECEIVED LETTER FROM JOE DEULLOA ON 5/8/92. RE:
SACTIONS AGAINST PACBEL FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMM.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
ROBERT GNAIZDA & MARK SAVAGE RECEIVED LETTER FROM JOE DEULLOA ON 5/8/92. RE:
SACTIONS AGAINST PACBEL FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMM.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI&LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
CALENDAR DATED 5/11/92 SUPERSEDES THE CALENDAR ATTACHED TO THE ALJ'S RULING OF
4/10/92. THE CALENDAR SHELL BE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS FILED IN THIS RULING.
RESPONSES TO "MOTION BY MEXICAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ASSIC., ET AL" ARE DUE 5/22/
92
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
MICKIEWICZ/STAFF/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
FOR AN ORDER SETTING DATES FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF GTE CALIFORNIA TO ESTABLISH A SEPARATE PROCEEDING REGARDING LIFELI
NE
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED'S MOTION TO ESTABLISH A LIFELINE PROG
RAM WORKSHOP
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED TO ESTABLISH A SEPARATE PROCEEDING
OR WORKSHOP TO INVESTIGATE CONCERNS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LIFELINE PROGRAM
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
WILSON/STAFF/PUC/DRA
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC. TO ESTABLISH A SEPARATE PROCEEDING OR
WORKSHOP TO INVESTIGATE CONCERNS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LIFELINE PROGRAM
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO GTE'S MOTION TO SEGREGATE THE ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO GTE'S MOTION TO SEGREGATE THE ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL
|
|
Description:
TO GTE'S MOTION TO SEGREGATE THE ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF GTE TO ESTABLISH A SEPARATE PROCEEDING TO INVESTIGATE LIFELINE PRO
GRAM
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL ASS
|
|
Description:
FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF TESTIMONY OF YVETTE SMITH ON BEHALF OF CALIFORNIA CABLE
TV ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
MALCOLM/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
SEPARATING OII 84 FROM REMAINING PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL ON 5/1/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY UNIVERSAL LIFELINE TELE. SERV. TRUST ADV.COMM ON 4/30/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
J.A. GUELDNER CONTACTED COMRS. FESSLER, ECKERT, SHUMWAY & SHUMWAY BY LETTER ON
5/1/92. RE: LETTER DATED 3/12/92 WHICH ADDRESSED UNIVERSAL SERVICE AMONG MINORI
TY HOUSEHOLDS
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
PAIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
M.J. MILLER CONTACTED COMR. FESSLER BY LETTER ON 4/30/92 RE: HISPANIC/ASIAN MA
RKET GROUP, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEUTZA/CACD/PUC
|
|
Description:
RE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK MONITORING REPORT ASSESSMENT
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER'S RULING RE: INSIDE WIRE MAINTENANCE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO ESTABLISH A SEPARATE PROCEEDING OR WORKSHOP TO INVESTIGATE CONCERNS RE:
LIFELINE PROGRAM
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
UNIVERSAL LIFELINE TELE. SERVI
|
|
Description:
AUDRIE KRAUSE CONTACTED CORM. FESSLER ON 4/27/92. RE: STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FO
R NEXT YEAR'S ULTS SURCHARGE RATE & ETC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MS. H.H. DERWINGSON CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA ON 4/30/92. RE: HISPANIC ASIAN MARKET
GROUP (HAMG)
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL ON 4/24/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
J.A. GUELDNER AND M.J. MILLER CONTACTED JOE DEULLOA ON 4/21/92. RE: INTRALATA C
OMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY LATINO ISSUES FORUM, MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLICAL ASSN AND AM
ERICAN G.I. FORUM ON 4/17/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY CALIFORNIA COMPETITIVE ACCESS PROVIDERS ON 4/16/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
EDITH ADAME CONTACTED COMR. FESSLER ON 4/14/92. RE: COMMISSION'S COMMITTMENT TO
ADDRESSING THE LACK OF TELEPHONE SERVICE AND POOR TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFOR
NIA HISPANICS COMMUNITY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLLITICAL
|
|
Description:
EDITH ADAME CONTACTED COMR. FESSLER ON 4/14/92. RE: COMMISSION'S COMMITTMENT TO
ADDRESSING THE LACK OF TELEPHONE SERVICE AND POOR TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFOR
NIA HISPANICS COMMUNITY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
EDITH ADAME CONTACTED COMR. FESSLER ON 4/14/92. RE: COMMISSION'S COMMITTMENT TO
ADDRESSING THE LACK OF TELEPHONE SERVICE AND POOR TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFOR
NIA HISPANICS COMMUNITY
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMPETITIVE ACESS
|
|
Description:
JOHN BOERSMA CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD & JOSEPH DEULLOA ON 4/13/9. RE: OVERALL
LEVEL OF LOCAL EXCHANGE AN DACCESS COMPETITION IN VALIORNIA, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PROVIDES CALENDAR FOR SCHEDULING TOOL; SETS HEARING DATES, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL ON 4/6/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
MIKE MILLER AND MAURY ROSAS CONTACTED COMR FESSLER ON 4/1/92. RE BACKGROUND INF
ORMATION ABOUT HISPANIC/ASIAN MARKET GROUP, OUTREACH PLANS FOR THE HISPANIC AND
ASIAN COMMUNITIES
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ASS
|
|
Description:
FOR FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE IN THE CONSUMER INTERVENOR PROGRAM
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G. I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE IN THE CONSUMER INTERVENOR PROGRAM
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 3, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE IN THE CONSUMER INTERVENOR PROGRAM
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY DRA ON 3/31/92
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
April 1, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF GTE CALIFORNIA TO MODIFY ORDERING PARAGRAPH SIX OF D89-10-03
1
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 31, 1992
|
Filed By:
MICKIEWICZ/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
JACK LEUTZA AND CYNTHIA WALKER CONTACTED ALJ AMAROLI ON 3/26/92. RE UNIVERSAL L
IFELINE TELEPHONE SERVICE POLICIES OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY GTE CALIFORNIA ON 3/27/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY AMERICAN G.I. FORUM, LATINO ISSUES FORUM AND MEXICAN-AMER
ICAN POLITICAL ASSN ON 3/27/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY GTE ON 3/27/92
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC
|
|
Description:
ELAINE LUSTIG AND JUDITH ENDEJAN CONTACTED ALJ AMAROLI ON 3/24/92. RE REHEARING
ON ALJ'S 3/23/92 RULING WHICH ALLOWED THE DISCLOSURE OF A GTE PROPRIETARY NUMB
ER IN A CROSS-EXAMINTION QUESTION TO REMAIN ON THE RECORD
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
CONTACTED COMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT, SHUMWAY AND DIR. SHULMAN BY LETTER O
N 3/12/92. RE PACIFIC BELL'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO LATINO HOUSEHOLDS IN
CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
CONTACTED COMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT, SHUMWAY AND DIR. SHULMAN BY LETTER O
N 3/12/92. RE PACIFIC BELL'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO LATINO HOUSEHOLDS IN
CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL
|
|
Description:
CONTACTED COMRS. FESSLER, OHANIAN, ECKERT, SHUMWAY AND DIR. SHULMAN BY LETTER O
N 3/12/92. RE PACIFIC BELL'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO LATINO HOUSEHOLDS IN
CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALFIORNIA INC
|
|
Description:
JUDITH ENDEJAN CONTACTED ALJ AMAROLI ON 3/26/92. RE ANTI-TRUST
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF GTE CALIFORNIA, INC TO MODIFY ORDERING PARAGRAPH OF D.89-10-
031
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/LEE/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE COMMENTS OF PUBLIC ADVOCATES ARE NOT ACCEPTED; PUBLIC ADVOCATES TO TO FILE
NOTICE OF EX PARTE CONTACT; NO MOTION OR OTHER REQUEST FOR RELIEF BY PUBLIC
ADVOCATES WILL BE HEARD UNTIL THEY COMPLY WITH RULE 1.4; SETS TESTIMONY AND
HEARING SCHEDULE
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
WATSON/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
GRANTS MOTION OF AMERICAN G.I. FORUM, LATINO ISSUES FORUM & THE MEXICAN -
AMERICAN POLITAL ASSOCIATION TO EXTEND TIME TO SUPPLY SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL
DATA TO 4/3/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 23, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY CITIZENS UTILITIES CO ON 3/19/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL ON 3/19/92
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. COMMENTS CONCERNING ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92 ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. COMMENTS CONCERNING ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92 ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 20, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL
|
|
Description:
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. COMMENTS CONCERNING ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92 ATTACHED
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO
|
|
Description:
PRESIDENT OF CUC CONTACTED COMR SHUMWAY ON 3/12/92. RE CALLER ID; IRD PHASE OF
THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK PROCEEDING AND ISSUES RELATING TO THE DEPRECIATION OF
OUTSIDE PLANT AND DEPLOYMENT OF FIBER OPTICS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT INC
|
|
Description:
TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES` RULING
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT INC
|
|
Description:
TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES` RULING
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF GTE CALIFORNIA TO MODIFY ORDERING PARAGRAPH OF D89-10-031
REGARDING DEPRECIATION APPLICATION
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
P.J. QUIGLEY CONTACTED COMR. FESSLER ON 3/16/92. RE UNIVERSAL SERVICE TO MINORI
TY HOUSEHOLDS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ALARM ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
ON THE ALJ`S 3/12/92 RULING REGARDING SCHEDULING
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING DATED 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
WILSON/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
REGARDING THE ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
ON THE ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
ON THE ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATIO
|
|
Description:
IN RESPONSE TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES RULING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 18, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
ON ALJ RULING OF 3/12/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY PACIFIC BELL ON 3/16/92
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE-M.J. MILLER CONTACTED COMR. FESSLER, ECKERT, OHANIAN, SHUMWA
Y, ADVISORS, CHIEF ALJ BY LETTER ON 3/11/92. RE PACBELL'S OUTREACH EFFORTS IN T
HE ASIAN AND HISPANIC COMMUNITIES
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT INC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL TO COMPEL CENTEX TO PROVIDE ANSWERS TO PAC BELL`S DAT
A REQUESTS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
WATSON/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
REQUIRING SUBMISSION OF FURTHER FINANCIAL DATA FROM THE AMERICAN G.I. FORUM,THE
MEXICAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ASSN AND THE LATINO ISSUES FORUM BY 3/20/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE BY CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT INC ON 3/11/92
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D92-01-023 BY GTE CALIFORNIA INC
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/LEE-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
RE REVISION OF SCHEDULE
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT INC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EXPARTE-TERRY L. MURRAY CONTACTED PHEBE GREENWOOD BY PHONE ON 3/8/92.
RE PROPOSED ELIMINATION OF THE SCHEDULED ONE-WEEK BREAK IN THE IMPLEMENTATION
AND RATE DESIGN HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D89-10-031 BY GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
March 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE BY TURN ON 3/5/92
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
March 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE-REGINA COSTA CONTACTED PHOEBE GREENWOOD ON 3/2/92. RE PROPOS
ALS BY PACIFIC BELL AND GTEC IN PHASE III TO ASSUME THAT MOST OF OR ALL COSTS O
F THE LOCAL EXCHANGE NETWORK SHOULD BE ALLOCATED TO BASIC LOCAL SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OF D92-01-023
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OF D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO COMPEL CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC. TO PROVIDE ANSWERS TO PACIFIC BELL'S DATA
REQUESTS
|
|
|
Type:
ASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 1992
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ORDER GRANTING REHEARING: ALJ WHEATLAND
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO CENTEX MANAGEMENT MOTION TO COMPEL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 7, 1992
|
Filed By:
MICKIEWICZ/DRA/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF CENTEX TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEE-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
SETTING FORTH INFORMATION THAT SHALL BE PROVIDED NO LATER THAN 2-25-92 BY PARTI
ES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT TO THIS RULING; PARTIES FAILING TO RESPOND OR PROVIDE E
XPLANATION FOR LACK OF RESPONSE BY 2-20-92 SHALL WAIVE RIGHTS FOR CROSS-EXAMINA
TION
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
SETTING FORTH INFORMATION THAT SHALL BE PROVIDED NO LATER THAN 2-25-92 BY PARTI
ES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT TO THIS RULING; PARTIES FAILING TO RESPOND OR PROVIDE E
XPLANATION FOR LACK OF RESPONSE BY 2-20-92 SHALL WAIVE RIGHTS FOR CROSS-EXAMINA
TION
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
February 5, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF GTEC TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF TESTIMONY OF REGINA COSTA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF DR. LEE L. SELWYN
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIF. BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF DR. LEE L. SELWYN
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 1992
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC
|
|
Description:
TO COMPEL PACIFIC BELL`S RESPONSE TO QUESTION 3 OF CENTEX`S THIRD SET OF DATA R
EQUESTS AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
January 30, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION OF GTE CALIFORNIA INC TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE REPORT OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
FOR A FINDING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENTAL
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
FILING IN RESPONSE TO ALJ RULING SOLICITING COMMENTS REGARDING DESIGNATION OF
COMMON LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM (THE)
|
|
Description:
FOR A FINDING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN AMERICAN POLITICAL ASS
|
|
Description:
FOR A FINDING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 24, 1992
|
Filed By:
SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF
|
|
Description:
FOR FINDING OF ELIGIBILITY FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 1992
|
Filed By:
UCAN
|
|
Description:
FOR AWARD OF INTERVENOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE AND/OR OBJECTION TO RECEIPT INTO EVIDENCE OF PAGES 46-52, PARAGRAPH
II, PAGES 56-57 OF THE DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINA COSTA AND PAGES 154-157 OF
THE DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LEE L. SELWYN
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
ESTABLISHING FURTHER PROCEDURES FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEE-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
ESTABLISHING FURTHER PROCEDURES FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
RESPONSE TO DRA MOTION THAT ALL CERTIFICATED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS BE FOR
MALLY NOTIFIED OF DRA`S RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPOSE END-USER SURCHARGE
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 1992
|
Filed By:
LEE-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
RESPONSE TO DRA MOTION THAT ALL CERTIFICATED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS BE FOR
MALLY NOTIFIED OF DRA`S RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPOSE END-USER SURCHARGE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE AND/OR OBJECTION TO RECEIPT INTO EVIDENCE OF CHAPTER 1, ET AL, OF
REPORT OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 17, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACTEL CELLULAR
|
|
Description:
TO DRA PROPOSED RATE DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON PETITION OF GTE CALIFORNIA FOR MODIFICATION OF D91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
ESTABLISHES PROCEDURES TO UTILIZE HEARING TIME IN PHASE III OF IMPLEMENTATION R
ATE DESIGN (IRD)
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 16, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
REQUESTS FOR COMPENSATIONTO BE FILED BY 1/27/92; PARTIES WHO HAVE REQUESTED COM
PENSATION TO DISCUSS PRIOR TO 2/5/92 VOLUNTARY COMMON LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND
ADVISE THE ALJ BY 2/7/92 IF THEY DESIRE SUCH
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 15, 1992
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES CELLULAR TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
SMALLER INDEPENDENT LEC'S
|
|
Description:
TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF ALJ RULING
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS,
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF DRA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TES
TIMONY BY ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 13, 1992
|
Filed By:
THAYER-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF ALJ`S RULING BY THE INDEPENDENT LECS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TEL CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 8, 1992
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
EMERGENCY FOR MODIFICATION OF THE ALJ`S RULING RE SUBMISSION OF REPLY TESTIMONY
AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PAC BELL FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT REPLY TESTIMONY AND FOR A
DELAY IN THE START OF IRD HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
VACATING HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF JANUARY 13, 1992 AND CONFIRMING REV
ISED HEARING SCHEDULE
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO REQUESTS FOR AN INTERIM DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
MEXICAN-AMERICAN POLITICAL
|
|
Description:
TO REQUESTS FOR AN INTERIM DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 2, 1992
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
|
|
Description:
TO REQUESTS FOR AN INTERIM DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 31, 1991
|
Filed By:
DRA/WILSON/PUC
|
|
Description:
THAT THE COMMISSION FORMALLY NOTIFY ALL CERTIFICATED TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CARRIERS OF THE POSSIBILITY OF IMPOSITION OF A SURCHARGE ON END USERS OF THEIR
SERVICE
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 30, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF PACIFIC BELL FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT REPLY TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 30, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL`S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND REQUEST FOR AN INTERIM DECIS
ION
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT REPLY TESTIMONY AND FOR A DELAY IN THE START OF
IRD HEARINGS
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
December 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D91-07-056 BY GTE CALIFORNIA INC
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 12, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO RESPONSES TO IT'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO D91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OF D91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COS
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROOD-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
TO COMMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
November 26, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE WEEK OF 1/6/92 RESCHEDULED TO BEGIN 1/13/92; REVISED
SCHEDULED FOR PHASE III (IRD) AS SET FORTH IN THIS RULING
|
|
|
Type:
AMENDED APPLICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUDISCO-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL`S AND GTE CALIFORNIA, INC`S MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ADU PURSUANT
TO D91-07-056, ORDERING PARAGRAPH 8
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S AND GTEC'S MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO D91-07-05
6, ORDERING PARAGRAPH 8
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S AND GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED'S MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDE
R PURSUANT TO D91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNIATIONS OF CALIFORN
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROOD/STAFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRA - ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ADDITIONAL, IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
November 20, 1991
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
CONCURRENCE WITH COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
RE THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
RE THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT'T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROOD/STAFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRA-IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CAIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
PINNACLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
RE THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
RE THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
RE THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
RE THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
RE THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
RE THE INSIDE WIRE COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 1991
|
Filed By:
FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 1991
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
TO THE MOTION FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO DRA'S OPPOSITION TO PACIFIC BELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF DECISIONS 89
-12-048, 90-02-053, 90-03-075 AND 90-11-058
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
October 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FROM ALJ AMAROLI & ALJ WONG TO ALJ AMAROLI, ALJ WONG & ALJ LEE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
THAYER-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL`S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D89-12-048; D90-02-053; D90-03-0
75 AND D90-11-058
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TEL CO
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIF-OREGON TEL CO
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TEL CO
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TEL CO
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TEL CO
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSE TEL CO (THE)
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TEL CO (THE)
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TEL CO
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROOD-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
FOR COMMISSION TO ADOPT SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF DECISIONS 89-12-048, 90-02-053, 90-03-075 & 90-11-
058 BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
October 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
TO RESPONSE OF GTEC RE COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
October 8, 1991
|
Filed By:
CABLE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATI
|
|
Description:
OF AT&T MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF TESTIMONY OF PACIFIC BELL'S WITNESS GLENN
SULLIVAN
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF NINE W. CORNELL`S TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
ALL PARTIES SHALL RESPOND TO PACIFIC BELL`S AND GTEC`S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE OR
DER BY 11-22-91; PACIFIC BELL AND GTEC SHALL REPLY TO RESPONSES BY 12-12-91
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OF DECISIONS 89-12-048, 90-02-053, 90-03-075 AND 90-11-058
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON-STAFF-PUC
|
|
Description:
FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS OF PACIFIC BELL AND GTE FOR PROTECTIV
E ORDERS
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO RECEIVE PORTIONS OF DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JERRY HAUSMAN, JANEEN K FISCHER AND
RICHARD L. SCHOLL INTO EVIDENCE UNDER SEAL
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO TURN`S REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
September 25, 1991
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIV.
|
|
Description:
SUBMITTAL, VOLUME 98
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO ORDERING PARAGRAPH 8 OF DECISION 91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 23, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
September 20, 1991
|
Filed By:
THAYER, JR-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
TO CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATIONS` MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF TESTI
MONIES OF RAMESH JOSHI AND DAVID BOWMAN
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 19, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIAITON TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PRE-
FILED TESTIMONIES OF RAMESH JOSHI AND DAVID BOWMAN
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PRE FILED D
IRECT TESTIMONIES OF RAMESH JOSHI AND DAVID BOWMAN
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MCI`S RESPONSE TO PACIFIC BELL`S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
September 11, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OF D91-07-044
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
IN SUPPORT OF TURN`S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO TURN`S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
September 9, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO TURN'S APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 6, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF TESTIMONIES OF RAMESH JOSHI AND DAVID BOWMAN
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 4, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO PACIFIC BELL'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 4, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
ALL PARTIES SERVING TESTIMONY ON 9/23/91 SHALL SEGREGATE SPECIFIC WITNESSES AND
TESTIMONIES ON ISSUE OF "COMPETITION" FOR HEARING OF 10/7/91 FROM ALL OTHER IR
D WITNESSES AND TESTIMONIES OF 9/23/91
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 30, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE-FILED REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION AND REQUEST FOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-07-056 BY TURN
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
August 26, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
OF D91-07-056
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO ALJ WONG FOR LIMITED REHEARING OF D89-10-031 GRANTED PER D90-04-031
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 20, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF DRA REQUESTING A PROCEDURAL ORDER BY THE FULL COMMISSION FOR PHASE
III
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TIME FROM NOW UNTIL 9-23-91 SHALL BE USED BY THE SMALL & MID-SIZED LECS, WHICH
TOGETHER INCLUDE ALL CALIFORNIA LECS, OTHER THAN PACIFIC BELL & GTEC, TO ANALYZ
THEIR CUSTOMERS' RECENT BILLS FOR BASIC LOCAL, AND INTRALATA MESSAGE TOLL SERV
ICE USAGE, ETC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION BY DRA REQUESTING A PROCEDURAL ORDER BY THE FULL COMMISSION SETTING A
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN WHICH CONFORMS TO
PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILK-COMMISSIONER-
|
|
Description:
AND OF ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER SHUMWAY-THE SCHEDULE OF PHASE III FOR THE
"IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN" SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A, HERETO.
PARTIES TO PHASE III OF I87-11-033 SHALL HEREAFTER USE THE CORRECTED LIST
CONTAINED IN APPENDIX B HERETO FOR SERVICES OF ANY PLEADINGS, FOR TENDERING
EXHIBITS, TESTIMONIES, AND OTHER OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE AND NOTICES
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
SHUMWAY-COMMISSIONER-
|
|
Description:
AND OF ASSIGNED COMMISSIONER WILK-THE SCHEDULE OF PHASE III FOR THE
"IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN" SHALL BE AS SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A, HERETO.
PARTIES TO PHASE III OF I87-11-033 SHALL HEREAFTER USE THE CORRECTED LIST
CONTAINED IN APPENDIX B HERETO FOR SERVICES OF ANY PLEADINGS, FOR TENDERING
EXHIBITS, TESTIMONIES, AND OTHER OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE AND NOTICES
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 12, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO DRA`S MOTION REQUESTING A PROCEDURAL ORDER BY THE FULL COMMISSION SETTING A
SCHEDULE FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN PROCEEDING
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
THAYER-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
REQUESTING A PROCEDURAL ORDER BY THE FULL COMMISSION SETTING A SCHEDULE FOR COM
PLETION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RATE DESIGN WHICH CONFORMS TO PROCEDURAL AND SUBS
TANTIVE DUE PROCESS
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE IIIA ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE IIIA ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE IIIA ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE IIIA ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE IIIA ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE IIIA ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE IIIA ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE IIIA ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
ASSOCIATED COMMUNICATIONS OF L
|
|
Description:
POST-HEARING CONFERENCE
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
July 30, 1991
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
RE PREHEARING CONFERENCE
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
PARTIES TO PHASE III OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK INVESTIGATION OF
I87-11-033 SHALL HEREAFTER USE THE 7-18-91 UPDATED "MASTER SERVICE LIST"
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
RE PREHEARING CONFERENCE
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
July 23, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FROM COM WILK TO COM WILK AND SHUMWAY
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
THAYER-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF GTE CALIFORNIA TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF GTE CALIFORNIA INC TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENTS OF UTILITY CONSUMERS ACTION NETWORK AND
TURN RE INSIDE WIRE PRICING AND POLICY CHANGES
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE FILING
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
PROPOSED COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI IN PHASE III A
|
|
|
Type:
REASSIGNED
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
FROM ALJ AMAROLI AND CAREW TO ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
REJECTION OF REPLY COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI BY MCI TELECOMM
UNICATIONS CORP
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI ADDRESSING POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISIONS OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISIONS OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISIONS OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISIONS OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISIONS OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISIONS OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI RE PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
THAYER/STAFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRA- COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON/STAFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRA- COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI ON PHASE III OF I87-11-033
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 11, 1991
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
July 11, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON/STAFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES, ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
ON THE PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF
|
|
Description:
ON THE PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OPENING REGARDING PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSN
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 28, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF GTE CALIFORNIA TO MODIFY D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 27, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE TO BE HELD JULY 10, 1991
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 25, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 25, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D89-10-031 BY GTE CALIFORNIA INC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-05-016 BY CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO ET AL
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO THE APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-05-016 BY CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY,
ET AL
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
June 20, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
June 20, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OF D89-10-031
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 19, 1991
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON/STAFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS OF DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES-ON THE PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ
AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
REPLY REGARDING PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-05-016 BY CALAVERAS TEL CO; CALIFORNIA-OREGON
TEL CO; DUCON TEL CO; FORESTHILL TEL CO; HAPPY VALLEY TEL CO; HORNITOS TEL CO;
THE PONDEROSA TEL CO; THE VOLCANO TEL CO AND WINTERHAVEN TEL CO
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 11, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNCATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ ON LEC MONITORING PROGRAMS
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ RE MONITORING PROGRAM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI ADOPTING MONITORING PROGRAM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI RE MONITORING
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
ON THE PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI ON THE MONITORING PROGRAM FOR PACIFIC
BELL AND GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1991
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TEL CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OF D91-05-016
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PROPOSED DECISION OD ALJ AMAROLI
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
May 21, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 1991
|
Filed By:
THAYER/STAFF/PUC
|
|
Description:
DRA-TO APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING OF D91-03-020 OF PACIFIC BELL AND GTE CALIFOR
NIA, INC.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1991
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
IN PHASE IIIA
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
TO THE APPLICATIONS OF GTE CALIFORNIA AND PACIFIC BELL FOR REHEARING OF
D91-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1991
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF
|
|
Description:
TO APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCCAW CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS,
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
CONCURRENT BRIEF
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON-STAFF-PUC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON THE PROPOSED DECISION
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROOD-STAFF-PUC
|
|
Description:
ON PACIFIC BELL`S PETITION TO MODIFY D91-02-018
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON POLICY ISSUES IN PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPA
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TEL CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
THAYER-STAFF-PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON-STAFF-PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
REPLY AND OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REGARDING PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF
|
|
Description:
REPLY AND OF THE CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION REGARDING PHASE
III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
REPLY ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENTS ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON-STAFF-PUC
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TEL CO
|
|
Description:
ON PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1991
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1991
|
Filed By:
AMAROLI-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
DENYING MOTION OF MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION TO ACCEPT LATE-FILED OPENI
NG BRIEF OF MCI
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OF D91-03-020 BY GTE CALIFORNIA INC
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1991
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
TO ACCEPT LATE FILED OPENING BRIEF AND PROPOSED BRIEF
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL CORP
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO, INC
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OPENING
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
BAY AREA TELEPORT
|
|
Description:
OPENING IN PHASE IIIA OF I87-11-033
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AND OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III SETTLEMENT AN OTHER POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
THAYER-STAFF-PUC
|
|
Description:
CONCURRENT OPENING ON POLICY PHASE PRECEEDING HEARINGS ON INTRALATA COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
WILSON-STAFF-PUC
|
|
Description:
CONCURRENT OPENING ON POLICY PHASE PRECEEDING HEARINGS ON INTRALATA COMPETITION
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
OPENING
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OPENING
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO OF CALIF
|
|
Description:
OPENING RE POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
CONCURRENT OPENING
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENIGN ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
TURN
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON POLICY ISSUES IN PHASE III
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TEL CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1991
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
OPENING ON PHASE III POOLING AND SETTLEMENT ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF
|
|
Description:
OPENING REGARDING PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
OF D91-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1991
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS CLEARING HO
|
|
Description:
OPENING REGARDING PHASE III POLICY ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OF D91-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1991
|
Filed By:
MALCOLM-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
DOCKET-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
PETN FOR MODIF OF D91-02-018 BY PACIFIC BELL
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
April 2, 1991
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIV
|
|
Description:
SUBMITTAL, VOLUME 96
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1991
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OF D91-02-018
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 21, 1991
|
Filed By:
MALCOLM-ALJ-PUC
|
|
Description:
SCHEDULING 4-12-91 PREHEARING CONFERENCE; ESTABLISHING NEW SERVICE LIST, AND SU
SPENDING DATE ESTABLISHED IN D91-02-018 FOR SUBMITTAL OF TESTIMONY
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
March 4, 1991
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC
|
|
Description:
COMMENTS REGARDING COST STUDIES WORKSHOPS
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 1991
|
Filed By:
MALCOLM/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PHC SET FOR 3-19-91
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
February 28, 1991
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
ON HIGH COST FUND ISSUES
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
February 28, 1991
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
RE RULE CHANGES FOR THE CALIFORNIA HIGH COST FUND
|
|
|