|
Number of Documents: 4022
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
directs that the Petitiion for Modification of Decision 94-09-065 filed by XO
California, Inc. and ICG Telecom Group, Inc. on 8/6/2001 be filed as a new
application (Corrected)
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
directs that the Petition for Modification of Decision 94-09-064 filed by XO
California, Inc. and ICG Telecom Group, Inc. on 8/6/2001 be filed as a new
application
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
August 29, 2001
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
This filing cancelled per ALJ Weishmehl's Ruling dated August 29, 2001. (This
filing originally appeared on the August 8, 2001 Daily Calendar.)
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 6, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Summary: On August 2, 2001, Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel of the
Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), had a telephone conversation with Robert
Wullenjohn, advisor to Cmmr. Brown. Lee-Whei Tan, ORA Regulatory Analyst, also
participated in the discussion. ORA stated that Pacific Bell (PacBell) has not
responded to discovery initiated by ORA. ORA stated that PacBell objected on
several grounds foremost of which being that ORA does not have discovery rights
in the absence of an open proceeding related to the audit.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Summary: LATE FILED. On July 10, 2001, Cynthia Marshall, Senior Vice President
? Regulatory & Constituency Relations of Pacific Bell Telephone Company
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Brown in San Francisco. Also present was James Young,
General Attorney and Assistant to General Counsel of PacBell. PacBell
representatives stated that the Office of Ratepayer Advocates has engaged in an
unauthorized audit of PacBell, in that they have made discovery requests that
goes beyond the ?shadow? audit and the scope of the Commission approved audit.
PacBell urged the Commission to adopt the alternate of Cmmr. Duque, which
modifies that language in decision 01-02-041.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Summary: On July 11, 2001, Cynthia Marshall, Senior Vice President ?
Regulatory & Constituency Relations of Pacific Bell Telephone Company
(PacBell), initiated a telephone communication to Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr.
Bilas. In the communication also participated Yvette Hogue, Executive Director
? Regultory Matters of PacBell. PacBell representatives stated that the Office
of Ratepayer Advocates has engaged in an unauthorized audit of PacBell, in that
they have made discovery requests that goes beyond the ?shadow? audit and the
scope of the Commission approved audit. PacBell urged the Commission to adopt
the alternate of Cmmr. Duque, which modifies that language in decision
01-02-041.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Duque
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of Cmmr. Duque
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Summary: On July 5, 2001, Regina Birdsell, Director of the Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present was
Jonathan Lakritz, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, and Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General
Counsel, ORA. ORA representatives stated that ORA supports the draft decision
and opposes the alternate. ORA explained that Pacific Bell has declined to
discuss any specific objections it may have to ORA's discovery on the new
regulatory framework audit based on its interpretation of D01-02-041 that bars
ORA discovery prior to the commencement of a proceeding. ORA stated that the
alternate does not resolve this legal issue. ORA explained that the alternate
would limit ORA's pre-proceeding discovery on the audit. ORA maintained that,
to the extent Pacific Bell has a specific objection to ORA's discovery and such
dispute cannot be informally resolved, section 309.5(e) provides for formal
resolution of such disputes.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 9, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
reply; on the draft decision of ALJ Weismehl
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Summary: On July 3, 2001, Regina Birdsell, Director, Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Brown in San Francisco. Also present was Robert
Wullenjohn, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Thomas Lew, Program Manager, and Hallie
Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel, of ORA. Written material (attached to the
notice) was used. ORA stated that it supports the draft decision regarding
ORA?s petition to modify D01-02-041 and opposes the alternate decision. ORA
explained that Pacific Bell has declined to discuss any specific objections it
may have to ORA?s discovery on the new regulatory framework audit based on its
interpretation of D01-02-041 that bars ORA discovery prior to the commencement
of a proceeding. ORA stated that the alternate does not resolve the legal
issue, which is the issue raised by ORA?s petition. ORA stated that the
alternate would prohibit ORA from conducting discovery in the matter of the
audit of Pacific Bell. ORA stated that ORA is fully expected to litigate the
matter. ORA explained that its discovery is focused on matters of particular
ratepayer interest and not duplicative of the audit being conducted by the
Telecommunications Division.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
Summary: On July 3, 2001, Regina Birdsell, Director, Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Duque and Cmmr. Lynch in two separate meetings
in San Francisco. Also present at the meeting with Cmmr. Duque were Lynne
McGhee and Fassil Fenikile, advisors to Cmmr. Duque, and Lee-Whei Tan, Public
Utility Regulatory Analyst of ORA. At the meeting with Cmmr. Lynch also present
was Trina Horner, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch. Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General
Counsel of ORA, participated in both meetings. Written material (attached to
the notice) was used. ORA stated that it opposes the alternate decision
regarding ORA?s petition to modify D01-02-041. ORA explained that Pacific Bell
has declined to discuss any specific objections it may have to ORA?s discovery
on the new regulatory framework audit based on its interpretation of D01-02-041
that bars ORA discovery prior to the commencement of a proceeding. ORA stated
that the alternate does not resolve this legal issue. ORA explained that, to
the extent Pacific Bell has a specific objection to ORA?s discovery requests
and such dispute cannot be informally resolved, section 309.5(e) provides for
formal resolution of such disputes.
|
|
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 2001
|
Filed By:
CMMR/DUQUE/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments are due by July 9, 2001; no reply comments accepted.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 2, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the Draft Decision of ALJ Weismehl
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 2, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on Draft Decision of ALJ granting Petition for Modification of Decision
No.01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
Parties may file comments by July 2, 2001; reply comments - within 5 days after
comments are filed.
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
May 24, 2001
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to response of Pacific Bell to TURN's request for an award of compensation
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to The Utility Reform Network's Request for Compensation
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 2001
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for an award of compensation for substantial contribution to D.01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 2001
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of the ORA to modify D01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
OBJECTION
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 2001
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
and response to the Petition of ORA to modify D01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 5, 2001
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
rules that responses to ORA's 3/1/2001 petition for modification of D.01-02-041
shall be filed by 3/8/2001.
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
|
|
Description:
of Decision No. 01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 1, 2001
|
Filed By:
ORA/FARRAR/PUC
|
|
Description:
to request an Order shortening time for responses to its February 21, 2001
Petition to Modify D01-02-041 and expediting decision on the Petition to Modify
D01-02-041
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to the supplement to joint application for rehearing of D00-02-047 of the ORA
and TURN
|
|
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to joint application for rehearing of D.00-02-047
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 4, 2000
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
authorizing the filing of supplements to applications for rehearing [Text
(Summary only): On or before 11-3-2000, parties may file a supplement to their
application for rehearing of D.00-02-047 or an initial application for
rehearing if no prior application for rehearing was filed. Responses to any
supplements or initial applications for rehearing may be filed by 11-10-2000.
END. GML.]
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply Comments on ALJ Redd's Draft Decision dated 6/6/00
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 2000
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
on draft decision of ALJ Reed regarding PacBell's petition to modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on draft decision regarding Pacific's petition to modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
June 6, 2000
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opinion. Mailed 06/06/2000. [Comments are due no later than 06/26/2000; Reply
Comments are due no later than 07/03/2000.MMN.]
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Comments on the April 21, 2000 ALJ's Ruling.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments in Response to April 21, 2000 ALJ's Ruling.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 2000
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
ALJ's Ruling. [Text: (1) On or before May 12, 2000, parties may file comments
indicating any significant reasons they believe exist to keep this docket open
and active other than consideration of the currently pending application for
rehearing of Decision 00-02-047; (2) On or before May 12, 2000, parties may
file comments responding to the questions above concerning the need and
repository for mailing lists currently derived from the service list for this
proceeding. END.MMN.]
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Response to the Joint Application for Rehearing of D00-02-047 of the Office of
Ratepayer Advocates and the Utility Reform Network.
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 30, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
of D00-02-047
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 22, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
On February 16, 2000, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates caused to be
hand-delivered to Commissioners Bilas, Duque, Neeper, Wood and Lynch, to their
Telecommunications Advisors and to the Chief ALJ Lynn T. Carew, a three page
letter signed by Terry R. Mowrey, Senior Manager. A copy of said letter is
attached.
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 2000
|
Filed By:
ALJ/JONES/PUC
|
|
Description:
Draft Decision. [Comments are due no later than 03/06/2000; Reply Comments are
due no later than 03/13/2000.]
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: On February 1, 2000 @ 2:00 p.m., at the CPUC in San Francisco, the
following person(s) met with Lester Wong, Advisor to Commissioner Bilas, to
wit: Janice Grau, Esq., of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates ("ORA") and
Lee-Whei Tan, Project Coordinator, ORA.
ORA advised it opposed the Revised
Draft Decision ("RDD") and observed that it conflicted with Commissioner Bilas'
Ruling on the bias issue in the PG&E General Rate Case. Adoption of the RDD
could handicap ORA in future investigations and discredit statistical and other
analytical proposals presented by ORA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 2000
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
On February 8, 2000, Thomas Long, Senior Telecommunications Attorney for The
Utility Reform Network ("TURN"), caused to be hand-delivered a letter addressed
to each of the five Commissioners with copies to each of the Commissioner's
telecommunications Advisors. A copy of said letter is attached.
Mr. Long
encouraged the Commission to avoid the appearance-of-bias analysis in the
Alternate Decision sponsored by Commissioner Duque in that the evidence relied
upon for the finding of bias would disqualify practically every consultant who
appears before the Commission. He also noted that the focus of D.96-05-036 was
to retain an auditor who lacked a conflict of interest with Pacific Bell, not
to screen out all auditors who could be deemed to have an appearance of bias
against it. He finally explained that the Commission is in danger of missing
its third statutory deadline for completing the audit.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
February 10, 2000
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
Comments on the Alternate Draft Decision of Commssioner Lynch Regarding the
Audit of Pacific Bell that was Required over Five Years Ago in Decision
94-06-011.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 10, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 7, 2000, Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, initiated a written
ex parte contact with Commissioner Bilas and his Advisors, Dorothy Duda and
Lester Wong, by causing to be delivered to them at the CPUC in San Francisco a
transmittal note and a copy of a letter and attachments sent to Commissioner
Lynch on January 28, 2000, copies of which are attached. Said letter was sent
to Commissioner Lynch to provide her with background and material facts
relevant to the dispute around ORA's proposed Section 314.5 audit.
One of the
points made in said letter was that the advocacy audit which Ora seeks to
perform goes well beyond the statute and is not in compliance with the
Commission's specific directives, which ordered an independent audit of the
books and records on an accounting, not advocacy, basis.
The letter to
Commissioner Lynch also highlighted sections of Decision 96-05-036 and copies
of two previous correspondences with the Commission. One letter was dated July
13, 1999 from J.W. Callaway, President, Pacific Telesis Group, to Commissioner
Hyatt and the other, a letter dated July 22, 1999 from Bill Blase to
Commissioner Hyatt. Mr. Callaway's letter expressed concerns with the proposed
audit and asked that no audit be conducted because (1) The Commission has
exempted most providers from this requirement; (2) the scope of the audit goes
well beyond the guidelines set forth in Decision 96-05-036 and Section 314.5;
(3) Ora and its selected contractors cannot be objective in that they have
repeatedly taken positions adverse to Pacific Bell in the past; and (4) if an
audit should be performed, it should be done by the Telecommunications
Division. ...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 3, 2000 @ 10:00 a.m., at the CPUC in San Francisco, the following
persons met with Commissioner Wood and his Advisor, Jonathan Lakritz, to wit:
Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, who initiated the meeting, Cynthia
Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell and Dan McCarthy, General
Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group. A written handout, copy attached, was used at
the meeting.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss Pacific Bell's concerns
with ORA's planned Section 314.5 audit and to support Commissioner Duque's
Revised Draft Decision. Mr. McCarthy indicated there was sufficient evidence in
the record to support reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications
Division. He also stated that Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision
properly concluded that Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D.94-06-011 was
timely and should be granted.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 2, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, initiated a contact with Commissioner
Lynch by causing to be delivered to her at the CPUC in San Francisco his letter
dated January 28, 2000, a copy of which , including all attachments, is
appended hereto. The purpose of said letter was to provide Commissioner Lynch
with background and material facts relevant to the current dispute around ORA's
proposed Section 314.5 audit of Pacific Bell.
The salient points of Mr.
Blase's letter and attachments were that the advocacy audit which ORA seeks to
perform goes well beyond the statute and is not in compliance with the
Commission' specific directives. The audit that the Commission ordered was an
independent audit of the books and records on an accounting basis, not an
advocacy audit. By Commission order, lengthy policy discussions were not
considered to be properly part of the audit. As demonstrated in an attached
summary and attached, highlighted (underlined) copies of ORA's RFP and Overland
Consulting's audit proposal, the advocacy audit that ORA proposes goes well
beyond the scope of the audit that the Commission ordered.
Mr. Blase's letter
also provided highlighted sections from Decision 96-05-036 and copies of two
previous correspondences with the Commission (both of which were timely
reported as ex parte communications) on this matter in the form of a letter
dated July 13, 1999 from J.W. Callaway, President, Pacific Telesis Group, to
Commissioner Hyatt and a letter dated July 22, 1999 from Bill Blase to
Commissioner Hyatt.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 1, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 27, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, who
initiated this oral ex parte communication, met with Commissioner Lynch at the
CPUC in San Francisco. A written handout (copy attached) was used during the
communication.
The purpose of the contact was to discuss Pacific Bell's
concerns with the proposed Section 314.5 audit of Pacific Bell and to support
Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision. Mr. Blase reviewed the procedural
history of this matter and also indicated there was extensive evidence to
support the reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications Division. Using
the handout, he stated that extensive information (approximately 50,000 pages)
was already provided in this and other proceedings and was available for review
of affiliate transactions and other areas in the ORA proposed audit.
Mr. Blase
stated that this was a unique situation in that there are multiple instances
where ORA's proposed audit scope has exceeded that ordered by the Commission.
For the many reasons outlined in Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision,
he urged that Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify was timely filed and cited
evidence that was not available until 1999.
Finally, Mr. Blase noted that the
performance of an audit of the books and records of Pacific Bell should be an
objective review, which was not possible given the auditors selected by ORA.
The audit should also comport with the scope of the statute and evaluate the
books and records only of Pacific Bell. The Commission should select and
entrust the management of this audit to a staff organization within the
Commission that will be seen as objective and fair under the unique
circumstances of this case. Etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 1, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFI C BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 27, 2000, at 11:30 a.m., at the CPUC in San Francisco, the following
persons met with Commissioner Duque and his Advisors, Lynne McGhee and Tim
Sullivan, to wit: Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, who initiated the
meeting, Cynthia Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell and Dan
McCarthy, General Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group, A written handout (copy
attached) was used during the communication.
The purpose of the contact was to
discuss Pacific Bell's concerns with ORA's planned Section 314.5 audit of
Pacific Bell and to support Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision. Mr.
McCarthy indicated there was sufficent evidence in the record to support
reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications Division. He indicated
that Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision properly concluded that
Pacific Bell?s Petition to Modify D.94-06-011 was timely and should be granted.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Notice of Ex Parte Communication. On January 26, 2000 @ 9:30 a.m., Bill Blase,
President Pacific Bell, Cynthia Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific
Bell and Dan McCarthy, General Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group, met with
Commissioner Neeper at the CPUC in San Francisco. The oral ex parte
communication was initiated by Mr. Blase. The purpose of the contact was to
discuss Pacific Bell's concerns with ORA's planned section 314.5 audit of
Pacific Bell and to support Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision. Mr.
McCarthy indicated there was sufficient evidence in the record to support
reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications Division. Mr. McCarthy
indicated that Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision properly concluded
that Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D.94-06-011 was filed in a timely manner
and should be granted.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 26, 2000 @ 9:30 a.m., Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell, Cynthia
Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell and Dan McCarthy, General
Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group, met with Commissioner Neeper at the CPUC in
San Francisco. The oral ex parte communication was initiated by Mr. Blase. The
purpose of the contact was to discuss Pacific Bell's concerns with ORA's
planned section 314.5 audit of Pacific Bell and to support Commissioner Duque's
Revised Draft Decision. Mr. McCarthy indicated there was sufficient evidence in
the record to support reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications
Division. Mr. McCarthy indicated that Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft
Decision properly concluded that Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D.94-06-011
was filed in a timely manner and should be granted.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 31, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 26, 2000, at 10:00 a.m., Bill Blase, President, Pacific Bell,
Cynthia Marshall, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell and Dan McCarthy,
General Attorney, Pacific Telesis Group met Commissioner Bilas and Commissioner
Advisors Dorothy Duda and Lester Wong at the CPUC in San Francisco. The oral ex
parte communication was initiated by Mr. Blase and a written handout (copy
attached) was used during the communication.
The purpose of the contact was to
discuss Pacific Bell's concerns with ORA's planned section 314.5 audit of
Pacific Bell and to support Commissioner Duque's Revised Draft Decision. Mr.
McCarthy indicated there was sufficient evidence in the record to support
reassignment of the audit to the Telecommunications Division. He stated (using
the attached handout) that extensive information (approximately 50,000 pages)
was already provided in this and other proceedings and was available for review
of affiliate transactions and other areas in the planned audit. Mr. McCarthy
indicated that Commissioner's Duque's Revised Draft Decision properly concluded
that Pacific Bell's Petition To Modify D.94-06-011 was timely and should be
granted. He noted that the performance of the audit was the Commission's
responsibility and asked that the Commission consider which staff organization
within the Commission would have the ability to conduct a fair and objective
audit of Pacific Bell under the unique circumstances of this case.
|
|
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 2000
|
Filed By:
CMMR/LYNCH/PUC
|
|
Description:
Draft Decision of Commissioner Loretta Lynch (Mailed 01/21/00) Denying the
Petition for Modification of Decision D94-06-011 filed June 10, 1999 by Pacific
Bell. Parties to the proceeding may serve and file their comments to this
Alternate Draft Decision no later than 02/10/2000. Reply Comments should be
filed and served by 02/15/2000. An original and four (4) copies of the Comments
and Reply Comments with a Certificate of Service shall be filed with the
Commission's Docket Office with copies served on all parties on the same day of
filing. The Commissioners and ALJ Weismehl shall be served separately by
overnight service.
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 2000
|
Filed By:
COMMR/DUQUE/PUC
|
|
Description:
Revised Draft Decision of Commr Duque.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 14, 2000
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
On January 11, 2000, Thomas Long, Senior Telecommunications Attorney, for The
Utility Reform Network (TURN), met with Cmmr. Bilas, in San Francisco. Also
present were Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; and Paul Stein, Staff
Attorney, for TURN. Long made the following points in support of the draft
decision (DD) of ALJ Weismehl and in opposition to the DD of Cmmr. Duque. Long
also stated that as a matter of equity, supervision of the Pacific Bell audit
should remain with the Office of the Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) because the GTEC
audit already well underway, is being supervised by ORA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On January 7, 2000, Tom Lew, Project Manager, for the Office of the Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Wood, in San Francisco. Also present were
Jonathan Lakritz, advisor to Cmmr. Wood; Lee-Whei Tan, Project Coordinator and
Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel, for ORA. A written materials were
provided and attached to the notice. ORA representatives stated that the
Pacific Bell audit would be the first in more than ten years and would provide
cost information relevant to proceedings in which rates, prices of services, or
value of assets are at issue. ORA representatives also stated that the audit
scope in the Request of Proposal (RFP) complies with the instruction of the
Executive Director as reflected in the September 18, 1998, a letter from the
Executive Director to ORA's Director, which ORA provided and attached to the
notice
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on Alt. DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
reply; on DD
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 3, 2000
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to comments of ORA, TURN, and UCAN on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 31, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 28, 1999, Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel, representing
the Office of the Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Neeper and Fassil
Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper, in San Francisco. David Morse, Senior
Manager, representing ORA participated by telephone. A written material was
provided and attached to the notice. ORA representatives stated that it
supports the analysis and conclusion of Administrative Law Judge Weismehl's
Alternate Decision (AD) which would affirm that ORA should continue to perform
the audit of Pacific Bell. ORA representatives also stated that, although it
disagrees with the result of the Draft Decision (DD) of Cmmr. Duque, that would
transfer responsibility for the audit to the Telecommunications Division (TD),
that determination is one of policy and subject to the Commission's direction.
ORA representatives stated that, in relying on its determinations that ORA did
not comply with the Commission orders to reach its result, the DD grievously
errs as a matter of fact and law. ORA representatives that, if the Commission
determines to transfer the audit responsibility to TD, ORA will nonetheless
need to perform a "shadow" audit in order to effectively participate in this
proceeding.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the Alternate DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on DD of Cmmr. Duque
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on ALT DD of ALJ Weismehl
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1999
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 24, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 21, 1999, David Morse, Senior Manager, on behalf of the Office of
the Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Cmmr. Wood, in San Francisco. Also
present were Jonathan Lakritz, advisor to Cmmr. Wood; and Hallie Yacknin,
Assistant General Counsel, for ORA. ORA stated that it supports the analysis
and conclusion of ALJ Weismehl's Alternate Decision (AD), which affirm that ORA
should continue to perform the audit of Pacific Bell. ORA stated that the
scope issues the DD raises (the sale of Bellcore and the merger between SBC and
Ameritech) were not included in ORA's Request for Proposal or otherwise
included in ORA's audit plan. ORA also stated that if the audit is transferred
to TD, Pacific Bell should be required to reimburse the Commission for ORA's
consulting costs in conducting such a shadow audit.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1999
|
Filed By:
FILIPINOS FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
KOREAN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA
OAKLAND CHINESE COMMUNITY COUNCIL
OAKLAND CITIZENS' COM./URBAN RENEWAL
SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE
SPANISH SPEAKING CITIZENS' FOUNDATION
|
|
Description:
to Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 23, 1999
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
December 22, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
Joint; to Pacific Bell's Petition to Modify D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 16, 1999, Hallie Yacknin, Assistant General Counsel, on behalf of
the Office of the Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), had a telephone communication with
Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, in San Francisco. ORA stated that it
stopped work on the Pacific Bell audit pending resolution of the Pacific Bell
motion to remove the audit to Telecommunications Division at the request of the
Executive Director and in consideration of the practical difficulty and
incremental costs that would be incurred in attempting to conduct the audit
over Pacific Bell's objections.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 13, 1999, Dr. Lee L. Selwyn of Economics and Technology, Inc. (ETI)
a subcontractor in the contract between California Public Utilities Commission
and Overland Consulting pursuant to the Office of Ratepayer's (ORA) Request for
Proposal (RFP), wrote a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Bilas, Cmmr.
Duque, Cmmr. Neeper, Cmmr. Hyatt, and Cmmr. Wood, in San Francisco. A copy of
the letter was also hand-delivered to Administrative Law Judge Phil J.
Weismehl. In the letter, Selwyn responds to allegation of bias made against
Selwyn and his firm by Pacific Bell which Selwyn stated are unfounded and
without merit. Selwyn states that ETI received ORA's RFPs and determined ETI
could contribute to the audit in the areas of affiliate relationships and
transactions and monitoring reports. Selwyn states that if the contract
between the Commission and Overland is abrogated, ETI, Overland and the other
team members will all have sustained economic harm which could have been
avoided had Pacific Bell filed its Petition for Modification earlier.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 16, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/YACKNIN/PUC
|
|
Description:
On December 14, 1999, David Morse, Project Manager and Hallie Yacknin,
Assistant General Counsel, on behalf of the Office of Ratepayer's (ORA), met
with Cmmr. Bilas, and Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas. And on the same
day, met with Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco. At
the meeting with Sullivan, Lynne McGhee, Staff Attorney for ORA, participated.
ORA stated that it supports the analysis and conclusion of ALJ Weismehl's
Alternate Draft Decision, which would affirm that ORA should continue to
perform the audit of Pacific Bell. ORA also stated that although it disagrees
with the result of the Draft Decision (DD) of Cmmr. Duque that would transfer
responsibility for the audit to the Telecommunications Division (TD), that
determination is appropriately one of policy and subject to the Commission's
discretion. ORA stated that, nonetheless, the DD grievously errs as a matter
of fact and law in its discussion and findings that ORA did not comply with
Commission direction regarding scope of the audit and consultant conflict of
interest. ORA also stated that, if the audit is transferred to TD, Pacific
Bell should be required to reimburse the Commission for ORA's consulting costs
in conducting such a shadow audit. In addition, during the meeting Sullivan,
ORA stated that the scope issues the DD raises (the sale of Bellcore and the
merger between SBC and Ameritech) were not included in ORA's Request for
Proposal or otherwise included in ORA's audit plan. ORA stated that DD claims
that D96-05-036's rejection of ORA's audit plan for lack of specificity
evidences ORA's failure to comply with Commission orders regarding scope of the
audit.
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
CMMR/DUQUE/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments are due 12/27; reply comments due 1/3/2000
|
|
|
Type:
ALTERNATE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
draft decision; comments are due 12/27; reply comments due 1/3/2000
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/ULMER/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On August 31, 1999, Andrew Ulmer, Attorney for the Office of
Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, in San
Francisco. Also present were Dorothy Duda, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; Tommy Lew,
Program Manager and Lee-Whei Tan, Regulatory Analyst IV, both from ORA.
Written materials were used and attached to the notice. Ulmer stated at the
meeting, that the August 6, 1999 Memorandum from the Executive Director to the
Commission misstated the requirements of the Pacific Bell audit which ORA
intends to conduct. Ulmer further stated that the Commission never required an
?objective? audit. In the audit ordered in Decision (D.) 94-06-011 and
affirmed by D.96-05-036 is an advocacy audit to protect ratepayers as Pacific
Bell moves from cost of service regulation to an incentive based regulatory
framework. Ulmer stated that if the Telecommunications Division provided the
results of the audit in an advisory capacity, the process would frustrate the
purpose of the audit to protect the public interest by removing the results
from a public forum. Ulmer stated that it is the Division best situated to
conduct the audit because of the complexity of Pacific Bell?s operations and
the competitive framework in which it operates.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/ULMER/PUC
|
|
Description:
On September 1, 1999, Andrew Ulmer, Attorney for the Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA), met with Norman Low, advisor to Cmmr. Wood. On the same day,
Ulmer met with Kim Malcolm, advisor to Cmmr. Hyatt, in San Francisco. Both
meetings, also present were Tommy Lew, Program Manager and Lee-Whei Tan,
Regulatory Analyst IV, both from ORA. Written materials were used and attached
to the notice. Ulmer stated at the meeting, that the August 6, 1999 Memorandum
from the Executive Director to the Commission misstated the requirements of the
Pacific Bell audit which ORA intends to conduct. Ulmer further stated that the
Commission never required an ?objective? audit. In the audit ordered in
Decision (D.) 94-06-011 and affirmed by D.96-05-036 is an advocacy audit to
protect ratepayers as Pacific Bell moves from cost of service regulation to an
incentive based regulatory framework. Ulmer stated that if the
Telecommunications Division provided the results of the audit in an advisory
capacity, the process would frustrate the purpose of the audit to protect the
public interest by removing the results from a public forum. Ulmer stated that
it is the Division best situated to conduct the audit because of the complexity
of Pacific Bell?s operations and the competitive framework in which it operates.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1999
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
in support of ORA's motion for an order denying PacBell's petition for
modification of D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 17, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
for an order denying Pacific Bell's petition for modification of
D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: On August 3, 1999, Terry Mowrey, Office of Ratepayer Advocates
(ORA) Senior Manager, met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Also present
were: Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; Thomas Lew, Project Manager,
and Janice Grau, attorney, for ORA. Written materials (attached to the notice)
were used. ORA stated that the Pacific Bell (Pacific) new regulatory framework
audit was overdue and must start promptly in order to meet the deadline
established by the Commission, that ORA is the appropriate division to conduct
the audit, that the audit conforms with the Commission directives in D96-05-036
and with additional directives of the Executive Director, that both ORA and its
consultant intend that the audit be conducted in a professional manner, and
that a thorough and aggressive audit is necessary for the Commission to ensure
that Pacific is complying with Commission rules and regulations.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED: On August 4, 1999, Terry Mowrey, Office of Ratepayer
Advocates (ORA) Senior Manager, sent written materials (attached to the notice)
to Cmmr. Bilas. Identical materials were also sent to Cmmr. Duque, Cmmr.
Neeper, Cmmr. Hyatt, and Cmmr. Wood, and all of the Commissioner's advisors.
The materials states ORA's position that it has complied with each of the
Commission's directives in D96-05-036 and the Executive Director's additional
directives concerning the preparation of an audit plan and the selection of an
auditor for Pacific Bell (Pacific) New Regulatory Framework audit. ORA also
responds to Pacific's cencerns about ORA's handling of the audits as follows:
Overland is independent of Pacific. Overland's audit team is predominantly
CPAS, Oveland will adhere to GAAS and NARUC consultant standards, the majority
of Overland hours are budgeted to fulfill the Commission's requirements and
GAAS, the audit scope and objectives are consistent with the Executive
Director's and the Commission's directives, and the audit cost is reasonable.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 5, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On August 2, 1999, Bill Blase, Vice-President-Regulatory, Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Also present were: Tim
Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; and Dan McCarthy, Senior Counsel, Pacific
Telesis Group. Blase expressed serious concerns with the audit that the Office
of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) and Overland Consulting propose to conduct. Blase
noted examples within the proposal, which demonstrated that the audit goes well
beyond the guidelines provided in D96-05-036 and Section 314.5. Blase also
stated PacBell's belief that ORA and its selected contractors could not perform
an objective Section 314.5 audit since ORA and its contractors have a conflict
of interest in that they have taken position adverse to PacBell. Blase asked
the Commission to reevaluate the public interest benefit of conducting any
audit of PacBell at this time. Blase suggested that if the Commission should
find that an audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be
transferred to the Telecommunications Division, the contract with Overland
Consulting should be cancelled and the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
On July 28, and July 29, 1999, Janice Grau, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates'
(ORA) attorney, met with Cmmr. Neeper and Cmmr. Wood, respectively, in two
separate meetings in San Francisco. Also present were: at the meeting with
Cmmr. Neeper - Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper; and with Cmmr. Wood -
Normal Low, advisor to Cmmr. Wood. In both meetings also participated Terry
Mowrey, Branch Chief, and Thomas Lew, Project Manager, for ORA. Written
materials (attached to the notice) were used. Referring to the Pacific Bell
new regulatory framework audit, ORA representatives stated that it was overdue
and must start promptly; that ORA is the appropriate division to conduct the
audit, that the audit conforms with D96-05-036 and directives of the Executive
Director, and that a thorough and aggressive audit is necessary to ensure that
Pacific Bell is complying with Commission rules and regulations.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On July 27, 1999, Janice Grau, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates'
(ORA) attorney, met with Cmmr. Bilas in San Francisco. Also present were:
Dorothy Duda and Lester Wong, advisors to Cmmr. Bilas; and Terry Mowrey, Branch
Chief, and Thomas Lew, Project Manager, for ORA. Written materials (attached to
the notice) were used. Referring to the Pacific Bell new regulatory framework
audit, ORA representatives stated that it was overdue and must start promptly;
that ORA is the appropriate division to conduct the audit, that the audit
conforms with D96-05-036 and directives of the Executive Director, and that a
thorough and aggressive audit is necessary to ensure that Pacific Bell is
complying with Commission rules and regulations.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 22, 1999, Bill Blase, Vice President Regulatory, Pacific Bell (Pacific)
sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Duque. An identical letter was
sent to Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque. The letter made the following
points: embarking on a costly and time consuming Section 314.5 audit of
Pacific does not appear to serve the pulic interest; Pacific's books and
records are already audited by a major independent accounting firm annually;
Pacific's achieved rates of return fell short of the sharing benchmark by over
$1.4 Billion over the years 1996-1998; though the Section 314.5 statute applies
to all telephone companies, the intent of the statute appears to be directed at
those utilities which are "rate of return" regulated, and the Commission has
exempted most telephone companies from the requirement, including our
competitors; customers and competitors are protected against cross-subsidies by
price regulation and Commission approved cost studies. The letter asked the
Commission to reevaluate the public interest benefit of conducting an audit of
Pacific at this time, given the changed circumstances since the Commission
originally ordered the audit. The letter added that if the Commission should
find that an audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be
transferred to the Telecommunications Division, and the audit should focus on
the literal wording of the 314.5 statute, "an inspection and audit of the books
and records".
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 26, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 21, 1999, Dennis Evans, Executive Director-Regulatory of Pacific Bell
(Pacific), sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Bob Lane, interim advisor
to Cmmr. Hyatt. Callaway's letter indicated that Pacific has serious concerns
with the audit the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) and Overland Consulting
(Overland) proposed to conduct. The letter noted that very few telephone
utilities are subject to such an audit since the Commission has exempted most
providers from the requirement. The letter stated that the scope of the audit
as requested by ORA, and as proposed by the selected bidder, goes well beyond
the guidelines provided by the Commission. The letter also stated Pacific's
belief that ORA and it's selected contractors can not perform an objective
Section 314.5 audit since ORA and the selected contractors have repeatedly
taken positions adverse to Pacific. Callaway's letter asked the Commission to
reevaluate the public interest benefit of conducting any audit of Pacific at
this time. The letter stated that if the Commission should find that an audit
should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be transferred to the
Telecommunications Division, the contract with Overland should be cancelled and
the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 19, 1999, Jim Callaway, President, Pacific Telesis Group (Pacific), met
with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were: Norman Low, interim
advisor to Cmmr. Wood; Bill Blase, Vice President Regulatory, Pacific Bell
(PacBell) and Dan McCarthy, Senior Counsel of Pacific. Blase expressed concern
with the Section 314.5 audit that the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA)
propose to conduct. McCarthy noted examples within the Proposal to Perform a
Regulatory Audit of Pacific Bell prepared by the selected bidder, Overland
Consulting (Overland), which demonstrated that the planned audit goes well
beyond the guidelines provided by D96-05-036 and the Section 314.5 statute.
McCarthy stated Pacific's belief that ORA and the selected contractor have a
conflict of interest in that they have taken positions adverse to PacBell.
Blase asked the Commission to reevaluate the benefit of conducting any audit of
PacBell at this time. Blase added that should the Commission find that an
audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be transferred
to the Telecommunications Division, and the contract with Overland should be
cancelled.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 20, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 15, 1999, Bill Blase, Vice-President Regulatory, Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Neeper in San Francisco. Also present was Dan
McCarthy, Senior Counsel, Pacific Telesis Group. Blase expressed serious
concerns with the audit that the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) and
Overland Consulting (Overland) propose to conduct. McCarthy noted that the
audit goes well beyond the guidelines provided in D96-05-036 and the Section
314.5 statute. McCarthy also stated PacBell's belief that ORA and its
contractors could not perform an objective audit since ORA and the contractors
clearly have a conflict of interest in that they have taken positions adverse
to PacBell. Blase asked that the Commission reevaluate the public interest
benefit of conducting any audit of PacBell at this time. Blase explained that
if the Commission should find that an audit should be performed, responsibility
for the audit should be transferred to the Telecommunications Division, the
contract with Overland should be cancelled and the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On July 14, 1999, Bill Blase, Vice President Regulatory, Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Bilas in San Francisco. Also present were: Dorothy
Duda and Lester Wong advisors to Cmmr. Bilas; and Dan McCarthy, Senior Counsel,
Pacific Telesis Group. Written material (attached to the notice) was used.
Blase expressed serious concerns with the audit that the Office of Rate
Advocates (ORA) and Overland Consulting (Overland) propose to conduct. McCarthy
noted examples, which demonstrated that the planned audit goes well beyond the
guidelines provided by D96-05-036 and the Section 314.5 statute. Blase stated
PacBell's belief that ORA and its selected contractors could not perform an
objective audit since ORA and the contractors have a conflict of interest.
Blase asked the Commission to reevaluate the public interest benefit of
conducting any audits of PacBell at this time and stated that if the Commission
should find that an audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit
should be transferred to the Telecommunications Division, the contract with
Overland cancelled and the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On July 13, 1999, Jim Callaway, President, Pacific Telesis Group,
sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Bilas. An identical letter was
also sent to Cmmrs. Duque, Hyatt, Neeper and Wood. The letter demonstrates the
fundamental flaws and unfairness of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates' planned
Section 314.5 audit of Pacific Bell. The letter asks the Commission to
re-evaluate the public interest benefit of conducting any audit of Pacific Bell
at this time. The letter states that if the Commission should find that an
audit should be performed, responsibility for the audit should be transferred
to the Telecommunications Division, the contract with Overland Consulting
should be cancelled and the process should be begun anew.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's Petition for Modification of D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
COMMR/DUQUE/PUC
|
|
Description:
denies PacBell's emergency motion to suspend the awarding of an auditing
contract pursuant to a request for proposal issued by ORA; as set forth
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's emergency motion to suspend the awarding of an auditing contract
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Emergency; to suspend the awarding of an auditing contract pursuant to a
request for proposal issued by the ORA on 3/29/99
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
June 10, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D94-06-011
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's appl. for rehear. of D99-04-071
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.C
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's application for rehearing
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
denies Pacific Bell's filing of 4/21/99 to extend the date for implementing
dialing parity; dismisses filing as moot
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to withdraw its Petition for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D99-04-071
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On April 20, 1999, the Office of Ratepayer Advocates ("ORA") told
Commissioner Neeper's advisor that ORA concurred with Administrative Law Judge
Walker's draft decision ("DD"). Counsel Janice Grau told Fassil Fenikile ORA
supported the DD which requires Pacific Bell to comply with the Federal
Communications Commission's dialing parity order and with D.97-04-083.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS/CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
on PacBell's Dialing Parity Plan for Implementing IntraLATA Presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Dialing Parity Plan for implementing intralata presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On April 16, 1999 AT&T Communications of California, Inc. ("AT&T") initiated an
ex parte meeting with Commissioner Duque. Present for AT&T were Rick
Witherington and Randy Deutsch, and they were accompanied by Richard Purkey
from Sprint and Richard Severy from MCI WorldCom. The attendees stated the
Commission should vote out ALJ Walker's proposed decision requiring Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on May 7, 1999 pursuant to the
requirements of the FCC. Advisor Timothy Sullivan was also in attendance.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On April 8, 1999 AT&T Communications of California, Inc. ("AT&T")
initiated an ex parte meeting with Commissioner Neeper. Present for AT&T were
Rick Witherington and Randy Deutsch, and they were accompanied by Richard
Purkey from Sprint and Richard Severy from MCI WorldCom. The attendees stated
the Commission should vote out ALJ Walker's proposed decision requiring Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on May 7, 1999 pursuant to the
requirements of the FCC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On April 14, 1999 AT&T Communications of California, Inc. ("AT&T") initiated an
ex parte meeting with Commission President Bilas. Present for AT&T were Rick
Witherington and Randy Deutsch, and they were accompanied by Richard Purkey
from Sprint and Richard Severy from MCI WorldCom. The attendees stated the
Commission should vote out ALJ Walker's proposed decision requiring Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on May 7, 1999 pursuant to the
requirements of the FCC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
in opposition to PacBell's Petition for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
|
|
Description:
to Petition of PacBell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's Petition to Modifiy D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of Pacific Bell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
in support of the Petition for Modification of D94-09-065 by Pacific Bell
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of Pacific Bell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the Petition of Pacific Bell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
to Petition of Pacific Bell for Modification of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply; in response to the DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the DD on dialing parity
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS/CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATION COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on the DD of ALJ Walker on dialing parity
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
on the DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1999
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO.
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on DD of ALJ Walker
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
CMMR/NEEPER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments to the attached DD of ALJ Walker are due by 4/6/99; reply - 4/11/99
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
March 25, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments are due by 4/6/99; reply - 4/11/99; this decision is attached to the
March 25, 1999 ruling shortening time for comments
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 15, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 8, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On March 3, 1999 AT&T Communications of California, Inc. ("AT&T") initiated
three (3) ex parte meetings with PUC officials and engaged in oral and written
ex parte communications in each meeting, covering the same subject matter each
time. The PUC officials were, in order: (a) Commission President Bilas and
advisor Lester Wong, (b) Tim Sullivan, advisor to Commissioner Duque, and ( c )
Commissioner Neeper and advisor Fassil Fenikile. The AT&T contingent for the
first meeting included Rick Witherington, and accompanying him were Richard
Purkey of Sprint and Richard Severy of MCI. For the second and third
meetings, Bob Munoz was the MCI representative instead of Mr. Severy. The
attendees encouraged the PUC officials to issue an order requiring Pacific Bell
to implement 1+ presubscription on an expedited basis as this would, it was
stated, benefit consumers and small businesses. Five (5) briefing sheets were
provided the recipients in the first two meetings (but none in the meeting with
Commissioner Neeper). The sheets were headlined "Public Interest," "IntraLATA
1+ Presubscription," "8th Circuit is Done," "No Justification for Further
Delays," "Pacific Bell Contradicts Its Own Legal Position," and "Immediate
Action Required." The writings were attached to the filer's Notice of Ex
Parte Communications.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
pursuant to the 2/3/99 Assigned Commr.'s ruling
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM, INC.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L.P.
|
|
Description:
pursuant to Assigned Commr.'s ruling of 2/3/99
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on dialing parity issues; pursuant to Assigned Commr.'s ruling of 2/3/99
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 11, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 8, 1999, four (4) Pacfic Bell ("PacBell") representatives met with
and engaged in oral ex parte communications at CPUC with Commission President
Bilas and advisor Lester Wong. The PacBell representatives were Ed Mueller,
President and CEO of PacBell, and Jim Callaway, Ric Zamore, Bill Blase, and Jim
Young. Notwithstanding the recent Supreme Court decision in AT&T v Iowa
Utilities Board, Mr. Young stated there is no mandate to change PUC's earlier
decision that intraLATA pre-subscription should coincide with PacBell's entry
into long distance. He said no change is required because: (a) Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC") rules may be subject to further review by the
Eighth Circuit, (b) Section 271 authorizes states to address timing, and thus
FCC rules would be guidelines, ( c ) Section 251(d)(3) of the Act preserves
state access rules and decisions not inconsistent with the Act, (d)
simultaneous entry was the basis for the parties' settlement and Commission
decision, and hence AT&T and others cannot now unilaterally change that.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 8, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
pursuant to the February 3, 1999 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1999
|
Filed By:
CMMR/NEEPER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Directs PacBell to file comments on 2/8/99, as set forth; invites parties to
file briefs on 2/19/99, as set forth; withdraws the January 7, 1999 draft
decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 2, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On January 29, 1999, three (3) Pacfic Bell ("PacBell") representatives met with
and engaged in oral ex parte communications at CPUC with Commissioner Neeper
and his advisor, Fassil Fenikile. The PacBell representatives were Bill Blase,
Jim Young, and David Discher. PacBell initiated the contact. Notwithstanding
the recent Supreme Court decision in AT&T v Iowa Utilities Board, Mr. Young
stated there are four (4) reasons why the Commission need not change its
existing decision requiring simultaneous inter LATA and intraLATA entry. The
four (4) reasons stated were (a) the timing issue may be subject to further
consideration by the Eighth Circuit, (b) Section 271 confers on states the
right to address timing, ( c ) preemption applies only to state rules
inconsistent with the Act, and (d) simultaneous entry was the basis for the
parties' settlement and cannot now be changed by some of those same parties.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
February 1, 1999
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
reply; on DD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPATION
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1999
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the draft decision
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
January 14, 1999
|
Filed By:
DKT/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
the 12/17/98 Sprint Ex Parte Notice to include proceeding number, I87-11-033,
which was left out of the notice when it appeared in the 1/12/99 daily calendar
|
|
|
Type:
DRAFT DECISION
|
Filing Date:
January 7, 1999
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
comments may be filed by 1/27/99; reply - 5 ds after comments are filed
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 18, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
pursuant to ALJ's ruling of 12/2/98
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
On December 14 and 15, 1998, Sprint Communications Co. L.P. ("Sprint")
conducted three (3) ex parte sessions with PUC officials, conducting the same
oral and written communications in each session. On 12/14/98 Sprint's Richard
A. Purkey met with Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Commissioner Duque, and then
with Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Commissioner Neeper. On 12/15/98, the Sprint
representative met with Lester Wong, advisor to Commission President Bilas. In
regard to "271" issues then scheduled to be discussed at the Commission's
12/17/98 meeting, Mr. Purkey stated Pacific will not be in compliance if
intraLATA equal access is not implemented on 2/8/99. He said the Commission's
procedure to allow further showing by parties after 2/8/99 is appropriate and
does not prejudge issues still under consideration in I87-11-033. Mr. Purkey
stated the Commission should explicitly require Pacific adopt procedures that
would ensure its employees not collect or disseminate the categories of carrier
information identified during the collaboratives by the Joint Presenters for
Pacific's own or its affiliate's marketing purposes. Mr. Purkey concluded by
saying the 15 day response time provided in the draft order to respond to
Pacific's .. etc..One was a one (1) page handout entitled "Suggested
Modifications to the Draft Order," and the second was a packet labeled
"confidential." The confidential packet was identified as selected portions of
"Sprint's Response to the 2/20/98 Joint Managing Commissioner's and
Administrative Law Judge's Ruling on Pacific Bell's Compliance with Section 271
of the Act." Sprint reports that included among the confidential material was
"Exhibit 17" to Sprint's response ...the ALJs ruling of 3/23/98 authorizes the
confidential status, and that Sprints "Motion ... Confidential information
under seal" filed 3/31/98 effects that status. Both the unsealed and sealed
written communications were filed by Sprint with its "Notice of Ex Parte
Communications.
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
pursuant to the December 2, 1998 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 15, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
regarding PacBell's obligation to priovide intraLATA toll dialing parity by
2/8/99
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 2, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
CMMR/NEEPER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Joint; briefs are due on 12/15/98
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 19, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 16, 1998, Pacific Bell ("PacBell) representatives initiated an ex
parte meeting at CPUC with Commissioner Duque and his advisor, Tim Sullivan.
Oral communications were conveyed, and a written summary sheet was also
provided the recipients. The PacBell representatives were Jim Callaway,
President Pacific Telesis, and Bill Blase, David Discher, and Cynthia Marshall.
The following points were conveyed: Intralata presubscription ("ILP") should
not be implemented prior to long distance entry for PacBell's affiliate,
otherwise irreparable harm to the company would result; consumers will not
receive the best possible offers if PacBell is not able to joint market long
distance, local toll, and local exchange service at the start of ILP. The
first sentence of the one-page handout read: "Congress intended that ILP and
PBCOM entry occur simultaneously."
|
|
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
Statement; pursuant to ALJ's 10/23/98 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI WORLDCOM TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
Joint statement; pursuant to ALJ's 10/23/98 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT
|
Filing Date:
November 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Statement; pursuant to ALJ's 10/23/98 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
November 10, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to the motion of AT&T, et al
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1998
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Ex parte Communication filed by AT&T Communications of CA, originally filed on
10/29/98 and appeared on the 11/2/98 Daily Calendar in order to include all
proceeding numbers listed on the notice
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1998
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Two (2) Ex parte Communications filed by AT&T Communications of CA, originally
filed on 10/27/98 and appeared on the 10/30/98 Daily Calendar in order to
include all proceeding numbers listed on the notice
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On October 29, 1998, Rick Witherington, Vice President of Government Affairs
for AT&T Communications of California, Inc., met with Cmmr. Duque in San
Francisco. Also present were: Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; Richard
Severy, Director of Public Policy for MCI; and Katherine Stokes Morehouse,
President of the California Association of Competitive Telecommunications
Companies. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Severy, speaking
on behalf of the long distance carriers, explained the basis for their recent
filing requesting that the intraLATA toll market be opened to 1+
presubscription. Severy noted that in light of changed circumstances since
D97-04-083, particularly Pacific Bell's failure to meet the requirements of the
271 checklist in 1997, the Commission should modify D97-04-083 to order Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on or before February 8, 1999 as
required by federal law.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 2, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On October 28, 1998, Rick Witherington, Vice President of Government Affairs
for AT&T Communications of California, Inc., met with Cmmr. Bilas in San
Francisco. Also present were: Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; Richard
Severy, Director of Public Policy for MCI; and Katherine Stokes Morehouse,
President of the California Association of Competitive Telecommunications
Companies. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Severy, speaking
on behalf of the long distance carriers, explained the basis for their recent
filing requesting that the intraLATA toll market be opened to 1+
presubscription. Severy noted that in light of changed circumstances since
D97-04-083, particularly Pacific Bell's failure to meet the requirements of the
271 checklist in 1997, the Commission should modify D97-04-083 to order Pacific
Bell to implement intraLATA presubscription on or before February 8, 1999 as
required by federal law.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 28, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On October 23, 1998, representatives of AT&T Communications of California, Inc.
("AT&T") met for one hour in Mendocino with Commission President Bilas at the
company's initiation. The representatives were AT&T Chairman C. Michael
Armstrong, accompanied by AT&T's David Condit, and Rick Witherington. Mr.
Armstrong expressed his company's recommendations in the Final Staff Report
("FSR") regarding Pacific Bell's impementation of the Section 271 "competitive
checklist." He discussed the company's unsuccessful efforts in providing local
service through resale of incumbent LEC services around the country. Mr.
Armstrong emphasized that in order to avoid a similar failed effort through use
of unbundled network elements, the Commission should ensure proper
implementation of the competitive checklist prior to approval of any
application for interLATA authority by SBC/Pacific Bell (PacBell). He said
AT&T desires the commission to comply with the current schedule and vote on the
FSR before the end of the year. Mr. Armstrong concluded by asking PUC to
proceed as quickly as possible on the iner-exchange carriers' request to
implement intraLATA pre-subscription before 2/8/99. Consumers are the ultimate
beneficiaries, he said, of opening this market by eliminating the requirement
to dial seven (7) extra digits when using a carrier other than PacBell.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On October 26, 1998, representatives of AT&T Communications of California, Inc.
("AT&T") met in consecutive sessions with PUC officials and conducted oral and
written ex parte communications. The two (2) sessions were with,
respectively, Commissioner Knight and his advisors, Dorothy Duda and Robert
Lane, and Commissioner Neeper and his advisor, Fassil Fenikile. The AT&T
contingent was slightly different for each session. In the first session, Rick
Witherington, David Condit, and Richard Severy attended. Mr. Severy was
identified as the "MCI Director of Public Policy." For the second session,
Katherine Stokes Morehouse, President of the California Assoc. of Competitive
Telecommunications Companies ("CALTEL") attended in place of Mr. Condit. Mr.
Severy represented himself to be speaking on behalf of the long distance
carriers. He stated the basis for AT&T's recent filing requesting the
intraLATA toll market in California be opened to "1+" pre-subscription. He
added there were changed circumstances since the issuance of D97-04-083,
particularly Pacific Bells ("PacBell") failure to meet the requirements of the
"271" checklist in 1997 as anticipated in the decision. Therefore, he stated,
the Commission should modify D97-04-083 to order PacBell to implement intraLATA
pre-subscription before February 8, 1999 as required by federal law.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 27, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
reschedules PHC from 11/20/98 to 11/23/98
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
October 26, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALTEL
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP
|
|
Description:
for leave to file reply to PacBell's and ORA's petition to modify D97-04-083;
reply attached
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 23, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
sets PHC on 11/20/98
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to AT&T, et al.'s petition to modify D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 14, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to AT&T's, Caltel's, MCI's and Sprint's petition to modify D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
September 17, 1998
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Recalendar AT&T's petition for modification of D97-04-083 to include petition
for modification wording and C87-07-024 caption; which were cut off on the
9/16/98 daily calendar
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
September 11, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/DEULLOA/PUC
|
|
Description:
Directs Docket Office to file AT&T, CALTEL, MCI, and Sprint's motion for an
order requiring PacBell to implement intraLATA presubscription as petition for
modification of D97-04-083; AT&T to serve Petition in I87-11-033; responses to
Petition due 30 days after Petitioners properly serve parties in I87-11-033
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
September 8, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
of D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 6, 1998
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to accept late-filed response; response attached
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
pursuant to 2/23/98 ruling of ALJ Reed
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1998
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
in response to the ALJ ruling of 2/23/98 soliciting comments on GTE's motion to
delay its 1998 triennial NRF review in view of Pacific Bell's NRF application
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1998
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
to ALJ 2/23/98 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1998
|
Filed By:
ALJ/REED/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments on 1998 Triennial Review of the new regulatory framework are due 3/3/98
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 1998
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to response of TURN
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 20, 1998
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to the responses of TURN, ORA, AT&T/MCI/Nextlink/California Cable Television
Association to the motion of GTE California Incorporated to delay the 1998
triennial review of the new regulatory framework until 1999
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 1998
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to the motion of GTE California to defer the 1998 review of the new regulatory
framework
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 1998
|
Filed By:
ORA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the December 19, 1997 motion of GTE California Incorporated (GTEC) to delay
its portion of the 1998 triennial review of the new regulatory framework (NRF)
until 1999
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
January 12, 1998
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIOM
NEXTLINK CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
to the motion of GTE California Incorporated to delay the 1998 triennial review
of the new regulatory framework until 1999
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to delay the 1998 Triennial Review *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 24, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 21, 1997, Michael Sasser, attorney for Pacific Bell (PacBell), sent
a letter (attached to notice) to Cmmrs. Conlon, Neeper, Knight, Duque, and
Bilas in San Francisco. A copy was also sent to Thomas MacBride, attorney for
CALTEL. Sasser stated that the Commission correctly denied CALTELs Petition
for Modification of the IRD decision, and its application for rehearing should
be denied as well. Sasser stated that CALTEL is wrong in arguing that the
Commissions discussion of revenue neutrality in D97-07-024 does not apply to
the issue of revenue neutrality raised by CALTEL in its Petition for
Modification and Application for Rehearing. Sasser stated that in denying
CALTELs Petition to Modify the IRD decision, the Commission correctly rejected
CALTELs argument that PacBells use of the surcharge/surcredit mechanism was
inconsistent with the IRD decision. Sasser stated that the Commission found
the effect of which CALTEL complains was not unanticipated and that if the
Commission had intended a change in the bill date method of applying surcharges
and surcredits it would have addressed that issue in the IRD decision which it
did not.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
CA ASSN OF COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATION
|
|
Description:
On November 13, 1997, Thomas MacBride, counsel for the California Association
of Competitive Telecommunications Carriers (CALTEL) sent a letter (attached to
notice) to Cmmrs. Conlon, Duque, Bilas, Neeper, and Knight. A copy of the
letter was also sent to: Izetta Jackson, counsel for the Commission; and
Michael Sasser, for Pacific Bell. MacBride stated that CALTEL's presently
pending application for rehearing of D96-03-021 raised issues different than
that raised by Pacific Bell (PacBell) in its application for rehearing of
D97-02-049...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On August 27, 1997, Robert Kargoll, Regulatory Director for AT&T Communications
of California, Inc. (AT&T), met with Cmmr. Bilas in San Francisco. Also
present were: Lester Wong, advisor for Cmmr. Bilas; Rick Witherington,
Government Affairs Vice President for AT&T; and William Harrelson, Senior
Attorney for MCI. Kargoll and Harrelson requested that Cmmr. Bilas seriously
consider the points outlined in the "Joint Petition to Modify D9704083,"
particularly with respect to how Pacific Bell markets intraLATA toll service
once intraLATA presubscription is implemented.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
August 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
|
|
Description:
for acceptance of late-filed response; response attached
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to the joint petition of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint to modify D9704093
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Joint Petition to modify D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
to ALJ ruling of 6/26/97
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF COMPETITIVE
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
of D97-04-083
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 16, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
of D97-06-104
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 26, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
invites parties to file, by 7/18/97, comments on whether to continue any of
these dockets, other than I87-11-033
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER AXS OF CALIFORNIA, LP
TIME WARNER CONNECT
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 1997
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS TELECOM. COMPANY/GOLDEN STATE
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO./TUOLUMNE
|
|
Description:
to ORA's response to motion for temporary suspension of toll dialing parity
requirements
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1997
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
n/a
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
Reply; to proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Concerning the proposed decision of ALJ Wong
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
n/a
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1997
|
Filed By:
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
May 23, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments due 6/12/97; reply comments due 6/17/97
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 22, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Citizens Telecommunications Company of Tuolumne and of Citizens
Telecommunications Company of the Golden State's petition for temporary
suspension of toll dialing parity requirements
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
May 13, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WONG/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments due 6/2/97; Reply Comments due 6/9/97
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
May 7, 1997
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS TELECOM. CO./GOLDEN STATE
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO./TUOLUMNE
|
|
Description:
of the Golden State for temporary suspension of toll dialing parity requirements
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules; pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules, pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules for CLCs
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
ICG TELECOM GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed rules for CLCs for implementation of intraLATA presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
in response to a 4/14/97 ruling requesting comments on proposed intraLATA rules
for CLCs
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on proposed rules for intraLATA presubscription by CLC, pursuant to 4/14/97
ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
GTE CARD SERVICES INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules of CLCs, pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed intraLATA rules for CLCs
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
TIME WARNER AXS OF CALIFORNIA, LP
TIME WARNER CONNECT
|
|
Description:
pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
COX CALIFORNIA TELCOM, INC.
|
|
Description:
regarding proposed intraLATA rules for CLCs
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESELLERS ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
pursuant to a 4/14/97 ruling
|
|
|
Type:
REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1997
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
for an award of compensation
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D97-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to application for rehearing of D97-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/16/97, Lynn Mowevery, PacBell, met with Cmmr. Conlon in SF. Also present
were: Jose Jimenez, adv. to Cmmr. Conlon; and David Dorman, and John Gueldner,
PacBell. Written material (attached) was used. Dorman asked the Commission to
modify the proposed decision to clarify that PacBell is allowed to tell
customers that it offers intraLATA toll service. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/16/97, Lynn Mowery, PacBell, met with Dorothy Duda, adv. to Cmmr. Knight,
in SF. Also present were: Ed Kolto-Wininger, Pacific Telesis, and Ronnie
Thierman, PacBell. Written material (attached) was used. Thierman asked the
Commission to modify the proposed decision to clarify that PacBell is allowed
to tell customers that it offers intraLATA toll service. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/16/97, Lynn Mowery, PacBell, met with Lester Wong, adv. to Cmmr. Bilas, in
SF. Also present were: Ed Kolto-Wininger, Pacific Telesis, and Ronnie
Thierman, PacBell. Written material (attached) was used. Thierman asked the
Commission to modify the proposed decision to clarify that PacBell is allowed
to tell customers that it offers intraLATA toll service. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 1997, Lynn Mowery, Director of Regulatory Relations for Pacific
Bell (PacBell), met with Fassile Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper, in San
Francisco. Also present were: Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; and
John Gueldner, Vice President Regulatory, and Ronnie Thierman, Executive
Director, of PacBell
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On April 17, 1997, Rick Witherington, Chief Regulatory Advocate for AT&T
Communications of California, Inc. (AT&T), met with Cmmr. Bilas in San
Francisco. Also present were: Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; and
Patricia vanMiddle, State Regulatory District Manager of AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 4/15/97, Natalie Billingsley of ORA participated in two separate meetings:
with Cmmr. Duque and with Cmmr. Conlon in SF. Also present at the first
meeting were: Timothy Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque; Helen Mickiewicz, staff
counsel for ORA; and other parties listed on the attachment to the notice. In
the meeting with Cmmr. Conlon also participated: Jose Jimenez, adv. to Cmmr.
Conlon; and Pat van Midde, and Rick Witherington, AT&T.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On April 15, 1997, Robert Kargoll, Regulatory Advocate for AT&T Communications
of California, Inc. (AT&T), met with Cmmr. Conlon in San Francisco. Also
present were: Jose Jimenez, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon; Patricia vanMiddle, State
Regulatory District Manager of AT&T
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 4/10/97, Helen Mickiewicz, Commission's ORA, met on separate occasions with
Fassil Fenikile, advisor for Cmmr Neeper, in SF. Mickiewicz stated that ORA
had read PacBell's ex parte notices, and did not agree that the
competitively-neutral business office practices set forth in the PD would
prohibit PacBell from affirmatively informing its customers that it provides
intraLATA toll service..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's application for rehearing of D97-02-049
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
directs CLCs and other parties to file comments on the proposed rules for
implementing intraLATA presubscription for CLCs; comments are due by 5/4/97
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
to PacBell's application for rehearing of D97-02-049
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
of D97-03-020
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Bilas in San Francisco. Also present were: David
Dorman, President and Chief Executive Officer for PacBell; and Richard Odgers,
Executive Vice President - General Counsel, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Also present were: Tim
Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque; David Dorman, President and Chief Executive
Officer for PacBell; and Richard Odgers, Executive Vice President - General
Counsel, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Neeper, in San Francisco. Also present were: Fassil
Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper; David Dorman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, PacBell; and Richard Odgers, Executive Vice President - General
Counsel, Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Jose Jimenez, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon, in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 7, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice-President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Knight in San Francisco. Also present were: Dorothy
Duda, advisor to Cmmr. Knight, and John Polumbo, President of Consumer Market
Group for PacBell
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 4, 1997, David Discher, Senior Counsel for Pacific Telesis Group, sent
a letter to Timothy Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 4, 1997, Mary Vanderpan, Vice President, Regulatory Regulations for
Pacific Bell (PacBell) met with Dorothy Duda, advisor for Cmmr. Knight, in San
Francisco. David Discher, Senior Counsel for Pacific Telesis Group, and Ronnie
Thierman, Executive Director, Regulatory Proceedings for PacBell, were also
present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 9, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 4, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice President, Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell) met with Timothy Sullivan, advisor for Cmmr. Duque, in San Francisco.
David Discher, Senior Counsel for Pacific Telesis Group, was also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/2/97, Mary Vanderpan, PacBell, met with Fassil Fenikile, adv. to Cmmr.
Neeper, in SF. Also present were: David Discher, Pacific Telesis Legal Group;
and Ronnie Thierman, PacBell. Vanderpan explained that PacBell is concerned
with the ORA claims for script review and the fact that the Commission did not
order cost recovery for notices to customers with existing interLATA PIC
freezes ..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
March 28, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of D97-02-049
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 17, 1997
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
Reply; on proposed decision concerning intraLATA toll dialing parity
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
Opening; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICNA G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 3/5/97, Mark Savage, American G.I. Forum and Latino Issues Forum, forwarded
to Cmmrs. Conlon, Knight, Duque, Neeper, and Bilas a letter (attached). The
letter addressed the proposed decision and alternate decision, and stated that
they are contrary to D95-08-051, as well as the statute and the record. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
Opening; on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 10, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE COMPANY
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
on proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On 3/4/97, Walter Mosley, AT&T, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Fassil Fenikile,
adv. for Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Fassil Fenikile, adv. to Cmmr. Neeper, was also
present. Written material (attached) was used.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
March 7, 1997
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On February 26, 1997, Mark Savage, counsel for the Intervenors, met with Bob
Lane, advisor for Cmmr. Knight, in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On February 13, 1997, Mark Savage, counsel for Intervenors, met with Cmmr.
Neeper in San Francisco. Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper, was also
present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On February 18, 1997, Mark Savage, counsel for Intervenors, spoke with Jose
Jimenez, advisor for Cmmr. Conlon in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 2/19/97, Mark Savage, for Intervenors, left a voice mail message for Bob
Lane, adv. for Cmmr. Knight in SF. Savage stated that the hours included in
the request for compensation were incurred between D93-09-076 and D94-09-065 to
produce the "settlement" and protest the "advice letter" cited in D94-09-065.
Savage stated that the ordering paraphaphs of D95-08-051 had already found that
Pacific Bell should pay for the hours incurred on the settlement.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 19, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 2/18/97, Mark Savage, Counsel for Intervenors, spoke with Fessil Fenikile,
advisor for Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Savage stated that the questions raised about
Intervenors' request for compensation continue to have ready answers, many of
which have already been provided in the request, the supplemental report, and
in D95-08-051.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 2/13/97, Mary Vanderpan, PacBell, met with Cmmr. Bilas, in SF. Also present
were Lester Wong, interim advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, and John Gueldner, PacBell.
A copy of pages (attached) from a 9/28/92 ex parte communication was used.
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
February 18, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due by 3/10/97
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 14, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 11, 1997, Lynn Mowery, Director Regulatory Relations at Pacific
Bell (PacBell), met with President Conlon in San Francisco. Also present were:
Jose Jimenez, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon; and John Gueldner, Vice President
Regulatory for PacBell
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 13, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 2/11/97, Alan Gardner, for CCTA, met with Cmmr. Conlon in SF. Jose Jimenez,
adv. for Cmmr. Conlon, was also present. Gardner stated that at this stage in
the proceeding the record was confusing and stale given the technological
developments which clearly made ISDN a Category II service. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 6, 1997
|
Filed By:
ALJ/CAREW/PUC
|
|
Description:
Orders that proceeding I87-11-033 identified by PacBell as a candidate
proceeding for the SB experiment not be included in the SB 960 experiment at
this time
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 5, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), met with Cmmr. Conlon in San Francisco. Jose Jimenez, advisor for
Cmmr. Conlon, was also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 5, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On February 5, 1997, John Gueldner, Vice President Regulatory for Pacific Bell
(PacBell), sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr. Conlon in San
Francisco. A copy of the letter was also sent to Jose Jimenez, advisor for
Cmmr. Conlon
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 4, 1997
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
PACIFIC BELL
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Joint; to adopt settlement agreement
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
|
|
|
Description:
On January 30, 1997, Alan J. Gardner, Regulatory and Legal Affairs Vice
President for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with
Cmmr. Knight in San Francisco. Bob Lane and Dorothy Duda, advisors for Cmmr.
Knight, and Cynthia Walker, Regulatory Manager for CCTA, were also present
|
|
|
Type:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
of identification of candidate proceeding (petition for modification of
D89-10-031) for SB960 experiment
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 1/29/97, Alan J. Gardner, for the CCTA, met with Bob Lane, adv. for Cmmr.
Knight in SF. Spencer R. Kaitz, of CCTA, was also present. Gardner stated
that CCTA believes that the record is confusing and stale given the
technological developments since the August hearing which clearly made ISDN a
Category II service with competition in California. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On January 30, 1997, Alan J. Gardner, Regulatory and Legal Affairs Vice
President for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Tim
Sullivan, advisor for Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Cynthia Walker, Regulatory
Manager for CCTA, was also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 1/30/97, Lynn Mowery, Pacific Bell, met with Cmmr. Bilas in SF. Also
present were: Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Bilas; John Gueldner, PacBell, and
Dick Odgers, PacBell. Gueldner stated that the IRD decision was intended to be
revenue neutral.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 3, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 1/30/97, Alan J. Gardner, CCTA, met with Cmmr. Knight in SF. Bob Lane and
Dorothy Duda, advisors for Cmmr. Knight, and Cynthia Walker, CCTA, were also
present. Gardner and Walker stated that CCTA believes that the record is
confusing and stale given the technological developments since the August
hearing which clearly made ISDN a Category II service with competition in
California.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1997
|
Filed By:
UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
|
|
Description:
On January 22, 1997, Thomas Long, Senior Telecommunications Attorney for The
Utility Reform Network (TURN), wrote a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmr.
Conlon. Copies of the letter were also delivered to Cmmrs. Knight, Duque,
Neeper and Bilas; and to the Cmmrs.' advisors Fassil Fenikile, Jose Jimenez,
Robert Lane, Dorothy Duda, Timothy Sullivan, and Lester Wong
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 1/22/97, Dick Odgers, Executive V.P. - General Counsel and External Affairs
for Pacific Bell, had a telephone conversation with Cmmr. Duque. Also
participating in the conversation were: Tim Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque; and
John Gueldner, V.P. Regulatory of Pacific. Odgers urged the Commission to
approve the proposed alternate decision of Cmmr. Neeper.
|
|
|
Type:
IDENTIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
January 27, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Identification of candidate proceeding (petition for modification of
D89-10-031) for SB960 experiment
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN.
|
|
Description:
On 1/21/97, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal Affairs of
CCTA, met with Lester Wong, Advisor to Cmmr. Bilas, in SF. Gardner stated that
the record is confusing and stale given the technological developments since
the August hearing which clearly made ISDN a category II service.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 23, 1997
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN.
|
|
Description:
On 1/21/97, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal Affairs of
CCTA, met with Jose Jimenez, Advisor to Cmmr. Conlon, in SF. Gardner stated
that the record is confusing and stale given the technological developments
since the August hearing which clearly made ISDN a category II service.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 21, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 1/15/97, Mark Savage, councel for Latino Issues Forum and the American GI
Forum (Intervenors), wrote and delivered a letter (attached) to Fassil
Fenikile, adv. to Cmmr. Neeper, in SF. The letter stated that both the draft
decision on Intervenors' request for compensation and D95-08-051 had compared
Intervenors' hours with TURN's hours. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 15, 1997
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
Augmentation Required. On 1/13/97, Mark Savage, counsel for the Latino Issues
Forum and American G.I. Forum (Intervenors), met with Jose Jimenez, advisor for
Cmmr. Conlon, in SF. Also present were: Fassil Fenikile, advisor for Cmmr.
Neeper; Dorothy Duda, advisor for Cmmr. Knight; and Rob Feraru, the
Commission's Public Advisor. Savage distributed a letter dated 12/6/96
addressing the draft decision, and a copy of the "Intervenors' Supplemental
Report." Written material was used, but was not attached to the notice.
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
January 2, 1997
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
semi-annual multilingual report - 7/1/96 - 12/31/96, in compliance with
D87-12-067
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On December 17, 1996, Lynn Mowery, Director for Regulatory Relations for
Pacific Bell (PacBell), met with Fassil Fenikile, advisor for Cmmr. Neeper in
San Francisco. Ed Kolto-Wininger, attorney for PacBell, and Ronnie Thierman,
Executive Director of Regulatory Proceeding for PacBell, were also present
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
December 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
CMMR/FESSLER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Discloses and makes available for public inspection the reports, findings,
requests for opinion of counsel, and the opinion of counsel
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On December 6, 1996, Mark Savage, counsel for Latino Issues Forum and the
American G. I. Forum, sent a letter (attached to the notice) to Cmmrs. Conlon,
Fessler, Knight, Duque, and Neeper in San Francisco
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
GTE WEST COAST INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
Concurrent reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Reply; on issues relating to intraLATA presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Reply; concerning intraLATA equal access issues
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
December 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Reply;
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
On 12/4/96, Timothy McCallion, for GTE, met with Lester Wong, adv. to Cmmr.
Conlon, in SF. McCallion stated that GTE would like to be heard on the joint
petition filed by PacBell and GTE in Sept. 1995,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On 12/4/96, Timothy McCallion, for GTE, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Also
present was Fassil Fenikile, adv. to Cmmr. Neeper. McCallion noted that GTE
felt that there may be an overlap between issues that would be considered in
the franchise impact proceeding,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
December 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On 12/4/96, Timothy McCallion, for GTE, met with Cmmr. Knight in SF. Also
present were: Dorothy Duda, adv. to Cmmr. Knight; and Carol Lam, for GTE.
McCallion stated that GTE would like to be heard on the joint petition filed by
PacBell and GTE in Sept. 1995,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
on PD
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
December 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
on the PD of ALJ Walker
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On November 25, 1996, Thomas Long, Senior Telecommunications Attorney for
Toward Utility Rate Normalization, met with Cmmr. Knight in San Francisco.
Also present was Dorothy Duda, advisor to Cmmr. Knight
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
November 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
on the proposed decision
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
Concurrent opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; phase III intraLATA presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Opening; on issues relating to intraLATA presubscription
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
Opening; on the implementation of intraLATA toll dialing parity in California
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; concerning intraLATA equal access issues
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE COMPANY
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Opening; on intraLATA equal access issues
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
November 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
Opening;
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 15, 1996, John Gueldner, Vice President of Regulatory for Pacific
Bell (PacBell), met with Cmmr. Knight in San Francisco. Also present was David
Discher, Senior Counsel of Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
PROPOSED DECISION
|
Filing Date:
November 15, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Comments are due on 12/05/96
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 13, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
n 11/8/96, Thomas Long, for TURN, met with Cmmr. Conlon, in SF. Lester Wong,
adv. for Cmmr. Conlon, was also present. Long stated that the alternate
improperly used a summary judgement standard for deciding whether to reopen a
final decision. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/5/96, Thomas Long, TURN, met Jose Jimenez, adv. to Cmmr. Fessler. Long
argued that the proper standard for the alternate to decide whether to reopen a
previous decision.., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/5/96, Thomas Long, TURN, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Fassil Fenikile,
adv. to Cmmr. Neeper, was also present. Long argued that the proper standard
for the alternate to decide whether to reopen a previous decision..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/5/96, Thomas Long, TURN, met with Cmmr. Duque in SF. Tim Sullivan, adv.
to Cmmr. Duque, was also present. Long argued that the proper standard for the
alternate to decide whether to reopen a previous decision..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 7, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 11/4/96, Lynn Mowwery of PacBell, met with Cmmr. Duque, in SF. Also present
were Tim Sullivan, adv. for Cmmr. Duque; John Gueldner, for PacBel; and David
P. Discher, Pacific Telesis Legal Group. Gueldner stated that three aspsects
of the alternate needed modification or clarification,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 7, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 11/4/96, Lynn Mowwery of PacBell, spoke with Jose Jimenez, adv. to Cmmr.
Fessler, in SF. Also present were: John Gueldner, for PacBel; and David P.
Discher, Pacific Telesis Legal Group. Gueldner stated that three aspsects of
the alternate needed modification or clarification,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 1, 1996, John Gueldner, Vice President of Regulatory for Pacific
Bell (PacBell), met with Cmmr. Neeper in San Francisco. Also present were:
Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper; Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon;
Mary Vanderpan, Regulatory Vice President of PacBell; and David Discher, Senior
Counsel of Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Thomas Long, TURN, wrote a letter (attached), delivered to Cmmrs.
Conlon, Fessler, Knight, Duque, and Neeper. The letter states that the
alternate order of Cmmrs. Conlon and Neeper used the wrong standard in deciding
whether to allow the Pet. for Mod. of PacBell and GTE to go to hearing...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Helen Mickiewicz, counsel for ORA, met with Cmmr. Duque, in SF.
Tim Sullivan, adv. for Cmmr. Duque, was also present. Mickiewicz urged Cmmr.
Duque not to support the alternate,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 6, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On November 1, 1996, John Gueldner, Vice President of Regulatory for Pacific
Bell (PacBell), spoke with Cmmr. Conlon. Also participating in the
conversation were: Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr. Conlon; Mary Vanderpan,
Regulatory Vice President of PacBell
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Alan Gardner, CCTA, spoke to Lester Wong, adv. to Cmmr. Conlon.
Gardner, referring to the Cmmr. Neeper's alternate, stated that the summary
judgment standard is not appropriate.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Alan Gardner, CCTA, met with Tim Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque, in
SF. Gardner, referring to the Cmmr. Neeper's alternate, stated that the
summary judgment standard is not appropriate.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Alan Gardner, CCTA, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Gardner,
referring to the Cmmr. Neeper's alternate, stated that the summary judgment
standard is not appropriate,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 4, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 11/1/96, Alan Gardner, CCTA, met with Dorothy Duda, adv. to Cmr. Knight in
SF. Gardner, referring to the Cmmr. Neeper's alternate, stated that the
summary judgment standard is not appropriate.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
November 1, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Late filed. On 10/28/96, Helen Mickiewicz, for ORA, initiated two separated ex
parte communications. In the first communication, Mickiewicz met with Jose
Jimenez, adv. for Cmmr. Fessler. In the second communication, Mickiewicz met
with Fassile Fenikile, adv. for Cmmr. Neeper. Both communications took place
in SF.
|
|
|
Type:
TRANSCRIPT
|
Filing Date:
October 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
REPORTING DIVISION
|
|
Description:
Submittal; volume 241
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 17, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Fassil
Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr. Neeper, in San Francisco. Also present was Cynthia
Walker, Regulatory Manager for CCTA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 17, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Cmmr.
Knight in San Francisco. Also present was Dorothy Duda, advisor to Cmmr.
Knight.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 17, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Cmmr.
Conlon in San Francisco. Also present were Lester Wong, advisor to Cmmr.
Conlon, and Glenn Semow, Director of State Regulatory Affairs for CCTA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 16, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Cmmr.
Neeper in San Francisco. Also present were: Fassil Fenikile, advisor to Cmmr.
Neeper; Spencer Kaitz, President and General Counsel, and Glenn Semow, Director
of State Regulatory Affairs for CCTA.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On October 16, 1996, Alan J. Gardner, Vice President of Regulatory and Legal
Affairs for the California Cable Television Association (CCTA), met with Jose
Jimenez, advisor to Cmmr. Fessler, in San Francisco. Also present were Glenn
Semow, Director of State Regulatory Affairs, and Cynthia Walker, Regulatory
Manager, for CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On October 15, 1996, Helen Mickiewicz, counsel for the Office of Ratepayer
Advocates, wrote a letter to Cmmr. Knight, and she also delivered her July 15,
1996 letter to Cmmr. Fessler
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 10/15/96, Alan J. Gardner, CCTA, met with Cmmr. Duque in SF. Also present
were: Tim Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque, and Glenn Semow, CCTA. Gardner
suggested that the proposed decision should be adopted due to the failure by
PacBell and GTE to comply with the Commission's procedure,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
October 16, 1996
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
corrects the ORA's ex parte filing, dated 10/11/96, calendared 10/15/96, to
show all proceedings on the daily calendar
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
ORA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Late filed. On 10/3/96, Norman Low, for ORA, had three separate meetings with
Cmmr. Knight; Tim Sullivan, adv. to Cmmr. Duque; and Fassile Fenikele, adv. to
Cmmr. Neeper, in SF. Helen Michiewicz, for ORA was also present. Written
summary of ORA's position was used and is attached. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On October 4, 1996, John Gueldner, at PacBell, met w/Cmmr Neeper, in SF.
Fassil Fenikile, advisor for Cmmr Neeper, & David P. Discher, for Pacific
Telesis Legal Group, were also present
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On October 7, 1996, John Gueldner, at PacBell, met w/Cmmr Knight, in SF. Also
present were: Bob Lane, advisor for Cmmr Knight; Richard W. Odgers, Pacific
Telesis Group; & David P. Discher, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On October 4, 1996, John Gueldner, at PacBell, met w/Cmmr Conlon, in SF. Also
present were: Lester Wong, advisor for Cmmr Conlon; Robert J. Mazique, for
Pacific Telesis Legal Group; & David P. Discher, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On October 7, 1996, John Gueldner, at PacBell, met w/Tim Sullivan, advisor for
Cmmr Duque, in SF. Richard W. Odgers, Pacific Telesis Group, & David P.
Discher, for Pacific Telesis Legal Group, were also present
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 13, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CA, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
DRA/MICKIEWICZ
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
GTE WEST COAST INC.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP
|
|
Description:
Joint; to adopt Settlement Agreement pursuant to Article 13.5 of the
Commissions' Rules of Practice and Procedure
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 12, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On September 10, 1996, Richard Odgers, of Pacific Telesis Group, wrote a ltr to
Cmmr Knight transmitting PacBell's September, 1995 petition to modify & the
amendment filed in January of 1996, w/certain portions highlighted (copies of
the documents are attached to the notice)
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
on ILP workshop report
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 2, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Sets procedural schedule; hearing - 10/7/96
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On July 16, 1996, William C. Harrelson, for MCI, met w/Jose
Jimenez, advisor for Cmmr Fessler, & Richard Smith, advisor to Cmmr Conlon in SF
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On 7/16/96, William C. Harrelson, MCI, met with Timothy Sullivan,
adv. for Cmmr. Duque in SF. Also present were Helen Mickiewicz, DRA; and
Walter Mosley, AT&T. Harrelson urged the Commission to reject GTEC Card
Services' Advice Letter #2,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On 7/16/96, William C. Harrelson, MCI, met with Fassil Fenikile,
adv. for Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Also present were: Helen Mickiewicz, DRA; and
Walter Mosley, of AT&T. Hareelson urged the Commission to Reject GTEC Card
Services' Advice Letter #2,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On 7/16/96, Walter Mosley, AT&T, met with Tim Sullivan, adv. for Cmmr. Duque in
SF. Also present were: Helen Mickiewicz, DRA; and Bill Harrelson, MCI.
Mosley, Mickiewicz, and Harrelson stated that Commission approval of GTE's
Advice Letter 8114, etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On 7/16/96, Walter Mosley, AT&T, met with Fassil Fenikile, adv. for Cmmr.
Neeper in SF. Others present were: Helen Mickiewicz, DRA, and Bill Harrelson,
MCI. Mosley, Mickiewicz, and Harrelson stated that Commission approval of
GTEC's Advice Letter 8114, etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On 7/16/96, Walter Mosley, AT&T, met with Richard Smith, adv. for Cmmr. Conlon,
and Jose Jimenez, adv. for Cmmr. Fessler in SF. Others present were: Helen
Mickiewicz, DRA; and Bill Harrelson, MCI. Mosley, Mickiewicz, and Harrelson
stated that Commission approval of GTEC's Advice Letter 8114, etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 7/15/96, Helen Mickiewicx for DRA, wrote a letter (attached) to Cmmr.
Fessler in SF. Mickiewicz stated that the Commission could not examine in
isolation the revenue losses PacBell and GTE claim to have suffered as a result
of toll stimulation lower than the ..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
July 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
CACD workshop set for 7/18/96; workshop reports due 7/31/96; cmmts on report
due 8/9/96
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 7/1/96, Norman Low of DRA met with Cmmr. Fessler in SF. Jose Jimenez, adv.
to Cmmr. Fessler; Helen Mickiewicz for DRA; Cynthia Morelli and Jim Brennan,
law clerks for Cmmr. Fessler were also present. DRA stated that the Commission
could not examine in isolation the revenue losses ..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
THIS IS AN AUGMENTED EX PARTE NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION WHICH WAS
FILED 7/1/96 AND APEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF 7/5/96. On 6/28/96, Dick Odgers,
PacBell, met with Cmmr. Conlon in SF. Karen Jones of CACD was also present.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 1, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On 6/28/96, Dick Odgers, for PacBell, met with Cmmr.
Conlon in SF. Karen Jones of CACD was also present.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 27, 1996
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
On 6/24/96, Mark Savage for Intervenors, met with Cmmr. Fessler in SF. Also
present was Cmmr. Fessler's adv. Jose Jimenez,...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 25, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 6/20/96, Lynn Mowery, PacBell, met with Cmmr. Fessler in SF. Also present
were: Cmmr. Fessler's adv. Jose Jimenez; Cynthia Morelli and Jim Brennen,
summer interns; and John Gueldner, VP of PacBell. PacBell said that its total
intrastate revenues decreased by $350 million in 1995. Written materials were
used and are attached.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 6/17/96, Mary Vanderpan, PacBell, sent a letter to Cmmrs. Fessler, Conlon,
Knight, Duque and Neeper. Vanderpan requested that the Comm. reject CalTel's
arguments and continue their implemetation of the PSSC,.. written materials
used and attached.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
Written cmmts due on 8/9/96
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 3, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: On May 15, May 16 & during the week of May 20th, the following
communications took place. On May 15, Janice Grau, for DRA, spoke w/ALJ
Bushey. On May 16, Grau spoke w/Cmmr Duque's advisor Tim Sullivan
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
June 3, 1996
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Correction to Daily Calendar of 06/4/96. The following docket numbers were
inadvertently omitted: A87-01-002, C96-11-028, C87-07-024, & I87-02-025
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 24, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 5/24/96, Mary L. Vanderpan, Reg. VP at PacBell, wrote a letter to Cmmr.
Fesler. Also receiving copies of the letter were Cmmrs. Conlon, Knight, Duque
and Neeper; ALJ Weismehl; Cmmr. Fessler's Adv. Jose Jimenez; Cmmr. Conlon's
adv. Richard Smith; Cmmr. Knight's advisor Robert Lane; Cmmr. Duque's adv. Tim
Sullivan; and Cmmr. Neeper's adv. Fassil T. Fenikile. PacBell expressed
concerns to the Commissioners on recent advice letters and motions that
requested rehearing and stay of Resolution T-15782 filed by the CALTEL, MCI,
and Sprint,...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WALKER/PUC
|
|
Description:
PHC is on 6/12/96. Motion of PacBell for procedural order commencing the
intraLATA presubscription phase of this proceeding & the joint petition for an
order requiring GTEC to immediately implement intraLATA equal access are
consolidated
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 15, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to motion of GTE California to modify Appendix A to D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 14, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Roseville Telephone Company's motion to establish memorandum accounts
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIS, INC.
|
|
Description:
to GTEC's petition to modify Appendix A of D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 30, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to CALDT's application for rehearing of D96-03-021
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to establish memorandum account relating to the implementation rate design
decision
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to Applications of MCI and California Association of Long Distance Telephone
Companies for rehearing of Resolution T-15782
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 29, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to Motion of MCI and Sprint for stay of Resolution T-15782
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to Joint Petition for an order requiring GTE California to immediately
implement intraLATA equal access
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CA. ASSOC. OF LONG DISTANCE TEL. COMP.
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
|
|
Description:
Joint; to PacBell's motion for a procedural order commencing an intraLATA
presubscription phase
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 4/23/96, Norman Low, Project Manager for the DRA, met with Cmmr. Conlon in
SF. Also present were Helen Mickiewicz, staff counsel for DRA, and Cmmr.
Conlon's advisor Richard Smith. DRA stated that the Commission could not
examine in isolation the revenue losses PacBell and GTEC claim to have suffered
as a result of lower toll stimulation than anticipated in D94-09-065,...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to Joint Petition to require it to implement intraLATA equal access immediately
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to amended joint petition for an order requiring GTE California to immediately
implement intraLATA equal access; & to motion of PacBell for a procedural order
commencing the intraLATA presubscription phase of this proceeding
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to GTEC's Motion for continuance of stay of 1996 price cap adjustment and to
establich memorandum account
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. On 4/12/96, Mary Vanderpan, Regulatory Vice President for PacBell,
met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Also present were John Gueldner, Vice
President Regulatory for PacBell, and Cmmr. Duque's advisor Tim Sullivan. A
handout(attached) ws provided. PacBell argued the following: the actual
increase in toll and switched access calling was more than $200 million below
that predicted by IRD; the data is straightforward; and there was to have been
a balance between revenue increases and decreases which, because the estimate
was too high, was not reached.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to the Joint Motion of GTE California and Pacific Bell for establishment of
memorandum account relating to the implementation rate design decision
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
to joint Motion of GTEC and PacBell for establishment of memorandum account
relating to IRD decision
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 4/15/96, Helen Mickiewicz of DRA, met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Others were
present. DRA explained that the Commission could not examine in isolation the
revenue losses that PacBel and GTE claim to have suffered as a result of lower
toll..., etc.
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
Appendix A to D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 16, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISHMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
Response to the Amended Joint Petition for an Order Requiring GTE California to
Immediately Implement IntraLATA Equal Access are due 4/26/96; & Responses to
the Joint Petition & the Motion of PacBell for a Procedural Order Commencing
the IntraLATA Presubscription Phase may be submitted in a single response
provided that parties doing so note the dual response in the title & clearly
indicate their positions & recommendations for each of the two pleadings to
which they are responding
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
April 15, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
|
|
Description:
of D96-03-021
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP
|
|
Description:
Amended Joint; for an order requiring GTE California to immediately implement
intraLATA equal access
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
for a procedural order commencing the intraLATA presubscription phase of the
proceeding
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On April 5, 1996, Lynn Mowery, for Pacific, met w/Cmmr Conlon in SF. Also
present were: John Gueldner, at Pacific; & Cmmr Conlon's advisor Richard Smith
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 8, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 4/3/96, Richard Odgers, Executive V.P. and General Counsel for Pacific
Telesis Group (PacBell), met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Also present were David
Discher, Senior Counsel for PacBell, and Cmmr. Neeper's advisor Fassil
Fenikile. A handout (attached) was used. PacBell stated that the actual
increase in toll and switched access calling was more than $200 million below
that predicted by IRD, and that there was to have been a balance of revenue
increases and decreases, but that was not reached because the estimate of
stimulation was too high,...etc.
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG DISTANCE
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
|
|
Description:
Joint; for an order requiring GTE California immediately to implement intraLATA
equal access
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Joint; for establishment of memorandum account relating to the implementation
rate design decision
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants GTE's motion for protective order
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
March 27, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Petition of GTEC to correct calculations in D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 20, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 3/15/96, Brian Chang, Project manager for the DRA, met with Cmmr. Fessler in
SF. Also present were: Helen Mickiewicz, staff atty for DRA; Glenn Stover for
AT&T; Lee Burdick for CCTA; Peter Casciato for Time Warner; Michael Golabek and
Don Eachus for GTEC; and Cmmr. Conlon's advisor, Richard Smith. DRA stated
that it does not dispute that the Commission can modify D93-09-038, but argued
that the Commission must hold a hearing to do so.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 19, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 3/14/96, Brian Chang, Project Mgr. for the DRA, met with Cmmr. Conlon in SF.
Also present were Helen Mickiewicz, staff counsel for DRA, and Cmmr. Conlon's
advisor Richard Smith. DRA urged that GTE California not be relieved of its
settlement obligations, because GTEC was aware of the risks it was taking..,etc.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 13, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to accept late-filed petition & motion
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
to place exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Donald C. Eachus under seal
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
of D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 12, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 3/7/96, Brian Chang of DRA, met with Cmmr. Duque in San Francisco. Others
were present. DRA urged the Commission not to relieve GTE of its settlement
obligations. etc.
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Motion of GTE California, Inc., to stay portion sof D96-02-023
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
On 3/6/96, Brian Chang of DRA, met with Cmmr. Knight in SF. Helen Mickiewicz
was also present. DRA explained the history of the settlement reached by
twelve parties to the 1992 NRF review, and the request by GTEC to modify the
decision adopting the settlement
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
March 11, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 3/7/96, Martin Mattes of CPA, delivered a letter to Cmmr. Fessler. The
letter concerned the intrLATA non-coin calls routing from pay telephones as
addressed in the Commission's recent decision in the above-captioned matter.
etc.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 28, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
requesting acceptance for filing of Request to Amendment of PacBell to Joint
Petition of PacBell and GTEC for Modification of D94-09-065; Response attached
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 26, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Late filed. On 2/20/96, Brian Chang of DRA met with Cmmr. Neeper in SF. Others
were present
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
February 23, 1996
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to stay portions of D96-02-023 on A-38 tariff adjustments
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 2/20/96, Thomas Keane, President of California Payphone Association (CPA),
met with Cmmr. Neeper's advisor, Jose Jimenez, in SF. Also present was Martin
Mattes, attorney for CPA. Mattes stated that the decision denying rehearing of
the language addressing the routing of intraLATA "0+" customer-owned pay
telephones (COPT), might adversely affect the availability of competitive
service by local carriers,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
February 21, 1996
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
On 2/20/96, Thomas Keane, President of California Payphone Association (CPA),
met with Cmmr. Neeper's advisor, Fassil Fenikile, in SF. Also present was
Martin Mattes, attorney for CPA. Mattes stated that the decision denying
rehearing of the language addressing the routing of intraLATA "0+"
customer-owned pay telephones (COPT), might adversely affect the availability
of competitive service by local carriers,..etc.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
February 15, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
to reply of GTE California Incorporated (GTEC) to response to petition of GTEC
for modification of D93-09-038
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
February 9, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
grants motion of Pacific Bell to accept proprietary information under seal to
the extent as set forth
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 30, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 1/29/96, Lynn Mowery, Director of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Bell
(Pacific), met with Cmmr. Duque's advisor, Tim Sullivan in SF. Also present
were: Larry Taylor, Project Manager for Public Communications; Lenore Alpert,
Regulatory Mgr for Pacific; and Dan Jacobsen, Director-Network & Exchange
Services for Pacific.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
January 30, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
On 1/29/96, Lynn Mowery, Director of Regulatory Relations for Pacific Bell
(Pacific), met with Cmmr. Neeper's advisor, Fassil Fenikile in SF. Also
present were: Larry Taylor, Project Manager for Public Communications; Lenore
Alpert, Regulatory Mgr for Pacific
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to file information under seal
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
AT&T
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZATION
|
|
Description:
in opposition to GTE's petition for modification of D.93-09-038
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
January 22, 1996
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA
CP NATIONAL
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
GTE CALIFORNIA
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
PACIFIC BELL
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY (THE)
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
Amendment to Joint; of D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
January 18, 1996
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
to Petition of C.P. National Corp.; Citizens Telecommunication Co. of
California, Inc.; Contel of California; Evan Telephone Co.; Foresthill
Telephone; GTE California Inc.; Kerman Telephone Co.; Pacific Bell; Ponderosa
Telephone Co.; Roseville Telephone Co.; and Tuolumne Telephone Co.; for
Modification of D.94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
January 5, 1996
|
Filed By:
ALJ/ECONOME/PUC
|
|
Description:
Grants petitioners' motion to accept their financial data under seal for
purposes of their joint petition to modify D94-09-065 as set forth
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
C.P. NATIONAL CORPORATION
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. OF CA
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
PACIFIC BELL
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
December 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. OF CA
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
CP NATIONAL CORPORATION
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATED
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
PACIFIC BELL
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
to accept their financial data under seal for purposes of their Joint Petition
to Modify D94-09-065
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
October 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ ECONOME-PUC
|
|
Description:
grants motion of PacBell and GTEC to accept proprietary information under seal
to the extent as set forth*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
|
|
Description:
On September 28, 1995, Roy Lathrop of MCI, met w/Cmmr Duque's advisor Tim
Sullivan in SF *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CORP.
|
|
Description:
On 9/28/95, Roy Lathrop, Mgr. of Reg. Afffairs, MCI, met with Jose Jiminez,
advisor to Cmmr. Fessler, in SF.,etc*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
October 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CORP.
|
|
Description:
On 9/28/95, Roy Lathrop, Mgr. of Reg. Affairs, MCI, met with Richard Smith,
advisor to Cmmr. Conlon, in SF.,etc.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
GTE WEST COAST, INC.
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
THE VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
to joint petition of Pacific Bell and GTE of California to modify D94-09-065.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
in opposition to joint petition of Pacific Bell and GTE of California for
modification of D94-09-065.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
October 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
WILSON-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
to petition of GTE of California for modification of D94-09-065.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 29, 1995
|
Filed By:
CAL. COMMTE. FOR LRGE. TELECOM. CNSMRS.
|
|
Description:
on joint petition of PacBell and GTEC for modification of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
MICKIEWICZ-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
to joint petition of PacBell and GTEC for modification of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
MICKIEWICZ-DRA-PUC
|
|
Description:
to joint petition of PacBell and GTEC for modification of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
On 9/20/95, Tim McCallion & Jenny Wong, GTE, met w/Cmmr Conlon & his advisor
Richard Smith in SF. Etc *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
September 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
On 9/20/95, Tim McCallion & Jenny Wong, GTE, met w/Cmmr Duque's advisor Tim
Sullivan in SF. Etc
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
September 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Of; To The Petition Of GTEC For Modification Of D.94-09-065.*
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
of D95-08-051 *
|
|
|
Type:
SUPPLEMENTAL
|
Filing Date:
September 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
AMERICAN G.I. FORUM
LATINO ISSUES FORUM
|
|
Description:
Filing of; Report Pursuant To D.95-08-051 In Support Of Their Request For
Compensation.*
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
September 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Of; To comments on intraLATA presubscription.*
|
|
|
Type:
MISCELLANEOUS FILING
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
Of; Request for Official Notice Regarding GTEC's Petition for Modification of
D.89-10-031.*
|
|
|
Type:
LAW & MOTION
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Joint; to accept proprietary information under seal*
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
September 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Joint; of D94-09-065*
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
of DRA-Mickiewicz in response to ALJ's ruling *
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
reply*
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
to opening comments filed on 7/31/95 *
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
August 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
reply; of intraLATA equal access.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
Of; In opposition to the petition of GTE California, Inc. for modification of
D94-06-011*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES - GRAU
|
|
Description:
Of; In opposition to the petition of GTEC, Inc. for modification of D94-06-011*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
Of; Pacific Bell to the petition of GTEC for modification of D94-06-011.*
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
August 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
WEISMEHL/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Of; Denies motion of California Telecommunications Coalition to eliminate reply
comments concerning intraLATA equal access filed 7/31/95.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 15, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
to motion of the California Telecommunications Coalition to eliminate reply
comments & to shorten time to respond to this motion.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF LONG DISTANCE TEL.
|
|
Description:
In opposition to the motion of California Payphone Asso. to dismiss the
application of the California Asso. of Long Distance Telephone Companies for
rehearing of D.95-06-062.*
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
to motion of California Telecommunications Coalition to eliminate reply
comments & to shorten time to respond to this motion.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMJUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
to the motion of California Payphone Asso. to dismiss the application of MCI
for rehearing of D.95-06-062.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On August 8, 1995, Richard Bromley, Vice-President - Government Affairs of AT&T
Communications of California, Inc., met with Cmmr. Knight and Jody London,
Cmmr. Knight's advisor, in San Francisco*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
August 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
On August 8, 1995, Richard Bromley, Vice-President - Government Affairs of AT&T
Communications of California, Inc., met with Cmmr. Fessler and Jose Jimenez,
Cmmr. Fessler's advisor, in San Francisco, etc*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
for rehearing filed by MCI & California Asso. of Long Distance Telephone
Companies.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOC.
|
|
Description:
to applications of MCI & California Assoc. of Long Distance Telephone Companies
for rehearing of D.95-06-062.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
petition for modification of D.94-06-011 by GTEC.*
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
August 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ
|
|
Description:
to motion of the California Telecommunications Coalition to eliminate reply
comments.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
to eliminate reply comments & to shorten time to respond to this motion.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALIFORNIA-OREGON TEL. CO.
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE CO.
DUCOR TELEPHONE CO.
FORESTHILL TEL. CO.
HAPPY VALLEY TEL. CO.
HORNITOS TEL. CO.
SIERRA TELEPHONE CO.
THE PONDEROSA TEL. CO.
WINTERHAVEN TEL. CO.
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
UTILITY CONSUMERS'ACTION NETWORK
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural scchedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILITIES COMPANY
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL (U 11 C)
EVANS TELEPHONE CO. (U 1009 C)
GTE WEST COAST INC. (U 1020 C)
KERMAN TELEPHONE CO. (U 1012 C)
PINNACLES TELEPHONE CO. (U 1013 C)
SISKIYOU TELEPHON CO. (U 1017 C)
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE CO. (U 1018 C)
VOLCANO TELEPHONE CO. (U 1019 C)
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DIVISION OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES - THAYER
|
|
Description:
On July 27, 1995, Kelly Boyd, Project Manager for the Commission's Division of
Ratepayer Advocates, and Rufus Thayer, Staff Attorney, met with Jose Jimenez,
Cmmr. Fessler's advisor, and Tim Sullivan, advisor to Cmmr. Duque, in San
Francisco, etc*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CONTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COALITION
|
|
Description:
*
|
|
|
Type:
COMMENTS
|
Filing Date:
July 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALL OTHER FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES
U.S. DEPT. OF DEFENSE
|
|
Description:
regarding intraLATA equal access issues & procedural schedule.*
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
of D.94-06-011.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to dismiss application of California Association of Long Distance Companies for
rehearing of D.95-06-062.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
July 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOCIATION
|
|
Description:
to dismiss application of MCI Telecommunications Corporation for Rehearing of
D.95-06-062.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Exp DRA *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Application for Rehearing of D95-06-062 by MCI Telecommunications *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Application for Rehearing of D95-06-062 by California Association of Long
Distance Companies*
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
of D95-06-062*
|
|
|
Type:
REHEARING REQUEST
|
Filing Date:
July 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
CA ASSN OF LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
of D95-06-062 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA
|
|
Description:
Jeffrey O'Donnell for DRA contacted Cmmrs Fessler, Conlon, Knight, & Duque by
ltr on 7/14/95. Etc. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Exp-GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
on 7/3/95, Timothy J. McCallion, of GTE, wrote a letter (attached) to Cmmr.
Fessler. Copies of the letter were provided to others. The purpose of the
letter was to respond to the joint CACD/DRA "Report to the Commission....Tariff
A-41 Premise Visit Charge" GTE urged the Commission to take no action,...etc*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1995
|
|
|
|
Description:
*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
On 7-3-95, Timothy J. McCallion, regulatory and governmental Affairs V.P-west,
for GTE, wrote a letter to Cmmr. Fessler (attached). Copies of the letter were
provided to Cmmrs. Conlon, Knight, and Duque; and administrative law judge
Weismehl. The purpose to the letter was to respond to the joint CACD/DRA
"Report to the commision regarding GTE's Practices in Assessing its Tariff A-41
Premise Visit Charge"... etc. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
Exp SUROC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
July 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
exp; CBCH *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
July 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
SENIOR UTILITY RATEPAYERS OF CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
On 6/29/95, C. Edward Wolfe of Senior Utility Ratepayers of California wrote a
ltr. (attached to notice) to Cmmr. Conlon. The communication objected to the
low hourly rate used to compute SUROC's award as erroneously published in
D.95-06-034 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 30, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA BANKERS LEARING HOUSE
|
|
Description:
On 6-30-95, Gerard F. Milano, of CBCH, sent a letter to Cmmr. Fessler
(attached). The letter commended the commission for moving forward on local
competition and universal issues and urged that the universal service docket
should be moved along quickly. In, addition, the letter expressed that the CBCH
had excercised and independent position on all telecommunications issues while
working with other interested parties in the Ca. Committee for Large Tele.
communications...etc *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC MCI
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: MCI *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
A.J. "TONY" DI TIRRO AND THOMAS MC DONALD OF MCI CONTACTED CMMR. FESSLER & HIS
ADVISOR JOSE JIMENEZ ON 6/19/95 IN S.F. DI TIRRO DISCUSSED THE DRAFT "OPINION
ON PETITIONS OF MCI, SPRINT, CALTEL, AND PAC BELL TO MODIFY D94-09-065." THE D
RAFT OPINION INVOLVES THE REQUESTS OF MCI, SPRINT, AND CALTEL TO DELETE CONCLUS
ION OF LAW 132 FROM THE CAPTIONED DECISION, WHICH ADDRESSED ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
June 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
the distribution of a document having the purported decision number,
D.95-06-058, was inaduertent and not reflect an official commision action *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 23, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CPA
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CPA *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 22, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CPA
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CPA *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOC.
|
|
Description:
MARTIN MATTES OF CPA TELEPHONED CMMR. CONLON'S ADVISOR RICHARD SMITH ON 6/16/95
IN S.F. MATTES REFERRED TO A DRAFT DECISION ON THE AGENDA FOR THE COMMISSION'S
MEETING OF 6/21/95, WHICH WOULD DENY PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF THOSE PORTIO
NS OF D94-09-065 THAT ADDRESSED THE PSSC. MATTES EXPRESSED CPA'S SUPPORT FOR T
HE DRAFT DECISION AS PROPERLY SUSTAINING THE COMMISSION'S PRIOR ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA PAYPHONE ASSOC.
|
|
Description:
ON JUNE 20, 1995, MARTIN MATTES OF CPA CALLED ADVISORS TO CMMR. FESSLER & CMMR.
KNIGHT, JOSE JIMENEZ & JODY LONDON, RESPECTIVELY, IN S.F. MATTES LEFT MESSAGES
ON BOTH ADVISORS' VOICEMAIL. MATTES SAID CPA SUPPORTED THE DRAFT DECISION ON T
HE JUNE 21 COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA THAT DENIES THE PORTIONS OF THE PETITIONS
FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 THAT ADDRESSED THE PSSC. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 3-GTEC
|
|
Description:
3 EX-PARTE NOTICES: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
ON 6/13/95, JENNY WONG & FREDERICK HESS, GTE, MET WITH RICHARD SMITH, CMMR. CON
LON'S ADVISOR; IN A 2ND MEETING WONG & HESS MET WITH JOSE JIMENEZ, CMMR. FESSLE
R'S ADVISOR IN SF. ALSO ON 6/13 WONG & HESS MET WITH TIM SULLIVAN, ADVISOR TO
CMMR. DUQUE, AT 711 VAN NESS AVE., IN SF. THE SAME HANDOUT (ATTACHED) WAS DISC
USSED IN ALL 3 MEETINGS, WHICH SUMMARIZED THE KEY POINTS OF A 5/24 FILING,.ETC*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EXP-Sprint
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC SPRINT
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DICK ODGERS, PAC TELESIS, MET WITH CMMR. FESSLER AND HIS ADV. JOSE JIMENEZ, ON
6/7/95 AT THE OFFICE OF GOV'T AFFAIRS IN SACRAMENTO. ODGERS POINTED OUT THAT I
T IS IMPORTANT THAT THE NRF REVIEW BE COMPLETED THIS YEAR AND THAT THE TIME HAS
COME TO DO AWAY WITH THE NRF STRUCTURE,....ODGERS PROVIDED WRITTEN MATERIAL SH
OWING PACBELL'S ANNUALIZED ANNUAL REVENUE REDUCTIONS,....ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
Patrick McMahon of Sprint, contacted Cmmr. Conlon on 6/8/95 in SF. Others were
present. the Sprint reps noted that Sprint has an interest in a joint venture
with TCI, and that the venture would be offering local service in CA in
competitino with PacBell and GTE,...etc.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
RICHARD PURKEY, SPRINT, WROTE A LETTER(ATTACHED) TO CMMRS. CONLON ON 6/6/95. T
HE LETTER ADDRESSED SPRINT'S POSITION REGARDING THE RBOCS ENTRY INTO THE INTERL
ATA MARKET. SPRINT BELIEVED THAT THE RBOCS, INCLUDING PACBELL SHOULD BE ALLOWE
D TO ENTER ONLY AFTER THEIR POWER TO HARM THE COMPETITIVE LONG DISTANCE MARKET
HAS BEEN ELIMINATED,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 2-PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 EX-PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 4-PACBELL
|
|
Description:
4 EX-PARTES; PACIFIC BELL *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/31/95, DICK ODGERS, PACIFIC TELESIS, WROTE A LETTER TO CMMR. CONLON. COPI
ES OF THE LETTER WERE ALSO PROVIDED TO RICHARD SMITH & JOSE JIMENEZ, ADVISORS F
OR CMMRS. CONLON & FESSLER. THE PURPOSE OF THE LETTER WAS TO EXPLAIN WHY PACBE
LL NEEDS MORE PRICING FLEXIBILITY THAN THE PROPOSED INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION R
ULES PROVIDE,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/31/95, JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, WROTE A LETTER TO CMMR. CONLON (ATTACHED) A
COPY WAS PROVIDED TO RICHARD SMITH, ADVISOR TO CMMR. CONLON. THE PURPOSE OF
THE LETTER WAS TO PROVIDE WRITTEN MATERIAL (ATTACHED) ON THE BELL ATLANTIC-AT&T
LAWSUIT WHICH HAD BEEN DISCUSSED EARLIER ON 5/30/95 (SEE NOTICE FILED 6/2/95)
THE WRITTEN MATERIAL CONTAINED EXCERPTS FROM THE 5/10/95 COURT OPINION,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORTED
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO THE PROTEST OF CTC AND DRA TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR
ODIFICATION OF D94-12-053; REPLY ATTACHED *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, PACBEL, CONTACTED JOSE JIMENEZ, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER ON 5/31
/95 IN SF. LYNN MOWERY OF PACBELL WAS ALSO PRESENT. PACKBELL DISCUSSED THE RE
ACTION OF THE INVESTMENT COMMUNITY TO THE PROPOSED INTERIM LOCAL COMPETITION RU
LES....,ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DAVE DOREMAN, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. DUQUE ON 5/30/95 IN SF. DICK ODGERS,
PACIFIC TELESIS, AND TIM SULLIVAN, ADV. TO CMMR. DUQUE, WERE ALSO PRESENT.
ODGERS EXPRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF CONCLUDING THE NRF OII PRIOR TO THE 10/1/96
PRICE CAP FILING,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DAVE DOREMAN, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT ON 5/31/95 IN SF. DICK ODGERS,
PACIFIC TELESIS, AND JODY LONDON, ADVISOR TO CMMR. KNIGHT WERE ALSO PRESENT.
ODGERS EXPRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF CONCLUDING THE NRF OII PRIOR TO THE 10/1/96
PRICE CAP FILING,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
June 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
DAVE DOREMAN, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 5/30/95 IN SF. DICK ODGERS,
PACIFIC TELESIS, AND RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON, WERE ALSO PRESENT.
ODGERS EXPRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF CONCLUDING THE NRF OII PRIOR TO THE 10/1/96
PRICE CAP FILING,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
June 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC MCI
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. EX-PARTE NOTICE: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
May 31, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ/WEISMEHL/PUC
|
|
Description:
respondants and interested parties to file issues relating to the
implesentation of intra-Local Acces & Transport Area equal acces on or before
7-31-95; responces to the issue and achedule proposals due by 8-31-95 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 30, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INC.
|
|
Description:
ON 5/25/95, JENNY M. WONG, WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO CMMRS. FESSLER, CONLON,
KNIGHT, AND DUQUE. COPIES OF LETTER WERE ALSO PROVIDED TO OTHERS ADVS. IN THE L
ETTER WOND INDICATED ATH AN EDITED VERSION OF APPENDIX A AND B WAS ATTACHED TO
FACILITATE THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW OF GTEC'S COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION'S PROPO
SED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPETITION FILED ON 5/24/95. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CWA/AFL-CIO
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO DIST. 9
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ANN GRESSANI, MCI, DELIVERED WRITTEN MATERIAL (ATTACHED) TO TIM SU
LLIVAN, RICHARD SMITH, JOSE JIMENEZ, AND ROBERT LANE, ADVISORS TO CMMRS. DUQUE,
CONLON, FESSLER AND KNIGHT. THE WRITTEN MATERIAL CONSISTED OF A COPY OF "A BL
UEPRINT FOR ACTION: THE TRANSITION TO LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPETITION" IT IDENTIFI
ED AND PROVIDED SOLUTIONS TO 8 MAJOR BARRIERS TO LOCAL EXCHANGE,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMER
|
|
Description:
JANICE WOOD, CWA, WROTE IDENTICAL LETTERS TO CMMRS. FESSLER, DUQUE, CONLON AND
KNIGHT ON 5/19/95. THE LETTER ADDRESSED THE INTERIM RULES ON LOCAL COMPETI
TION IN CALIFORNIA AND THE NEED FOR NRF REFORM. WOOD STATED THAT THE INTERIM R
ULES CANNOT PROMOTE FAIR COMPETITION WITHOUT PROMPT AND SIGNIFICANT REFORM OF N
RF; THE COMMENCEMENT OF NRF REFORM HAS ALREADY BEEN GREATLY DELAYED,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 22, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LEE BAUMAN, MET WITH RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON AND OTHER ADVS. ON
5/17/95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE ALSO PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE PROPOSED LOCAL C
OMPETITION RULE. PACBELL INDICATED THAT COMPARED TO OTHER STATES, CALIFORNIA IS
MORE VULNERABLE TO CREAM-SKIMMING BY COMPETITORS AND LOSSES WILL OCCUR MUCH FAS
TER HERE. COMPETITORS ARE RAPIDLY TAKING LOCAL TOLL MARKET SHARE. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
TO PETITION OF GTEC FOR MODIFICATION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR CLARIFICATION
OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO THE PETITION OF GTEC FOR MODIFICATION OF D.94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
TO ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHIL QUIGLEY, PT AND PACBELL, MET WITH CMMR. KNIGHT ON 5/12/95 AT THE VILLA TAV
ERNA RESTAURANT IN SF. QUIGLEY DISCUSSED THE FINANCIAL IMPACT ON PACBELL OF TH
E NRF STRUCTURE, THE COMMISSION'S PRPOSED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION,
AND INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION. QUIGLEY POINTED OUT THE COMPOUNDING EFFECT OF
THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR, THE LACK OF VOLUME INCREASES AND REVENUES,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 16, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 15, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/12/95, JOHN A. GUELDNER, WROTE A LETTER, WITH ATTACHMENTS (ATTACHED) TO CM
MR. DUQUE AND COPIED THE SAME TO TIM SULLIVAN, ADV. TO CMMR. DUQUE. THE LETTER
SUMMARIZED THE ATTACHMENTS WHICH CONSISTED OF A TWO-PART REPORT ON BYPASS. THE
FIRST PART OF THE REPORT IS A ONE PAGE DOCUMENT TITLED "CPUC BYPASS REPORT." TH
E REPORT SHOWS THE EXTENT OF COMPETITION IMPACTING PACBELL. ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 15, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/1/95, DICK ODGERS WROTE IDENTICAL LETTERS TO CMMRS CONLON, DUQUE, FESSLER
AND KNIGHT, COPIES WERE PROVIDED TO THE ADVISORS. THE LETTER EMPHASIZED THE CR
ITICAL ISSUES CURRENTLY FACING PACIFIC BELL AND REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION INI
TIATE ITS 1995 NRF REVIEW AT THE 5/25/95 MEETING AND CONCLUDE THE PROCEEDING AT
BY THE END OF SUMMER. ODGERS SAID THAT THE PACE OF CHANGE HAD QUICKENED, ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
RECALENDARED
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL -
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
May 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/GRAU/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL - SEE RECALENDARED NOTICE 5/12/95 FOR CORRECT ENTRY
|
|
|
Type:
COMPLIANCE FILING
|
Filing Date:
May 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
IN COMPLIANCE WITH O.P. II, D93-05-062 MANAGEMENT AUDIT REPORT *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 LATE FILED EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
CORRECTED NOTICE OF AN EXPARTE COMMUNICATION FILED ON 5/10 AND IN 5/11/95 D.C.
PHIL QUIGLEY, PACIFIC TELESIS, MET WITH CMMR DUQUE ON 5/5/95 AT THE ACT IV REST
AURANT IN SF. LYNN MOWERY, OF PACBELL INITIATED THE MEETING. THE PURPOSE OF T
HE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE FINANCIAL IMPACTON PACBELL OF THE NRF STRUCTURE,
THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSAL INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION,...ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9412053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHIL QUIGLEY, COMMUNICATED WITH CMMR. FESSLER ON 5/4/95 AT VILLA TAVERNA RESTAU
RANT IN SF. LYNN MOWERY OF PG&E WAS ALSO PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE FINANCI
AL IMPACT OF THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK STRUCTURE, THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSED
INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, AND INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION. QUIGLEY PO
INTED OUT THE COMPOUNDING EFFECT OF THE PRODUCTIVITY FACTOR AND THE..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: ON 5/3/95, PHIL QUIGLEY WROTE THE SAME LETTER TO CMMRS FESSLER & D
UQUE. INCLUDED IN THE LETTER WAS A COVER NOTE DATED 5/4/95 FROM DICK ODGERS.
THE COVER NOTE STATED THAT PACBELL HAD BEEN DOWNGRADED BY DUFF & PHELPS. IN TH
E LETTER, QUIGLEY MADE THE FF POINTS: THE COMMISSION'S 4/26/95 PROPOSED RULES
FOR LOCAL COMPETITION WERE RECEIVED WITH SUCH UNIVERSAL ALARM, ETC..*
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
REPLY; *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 5/4/95, PHIL QUIGLEY, WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) TO CMMR. KNIGHT. QUIGLEY POI
NTED OUT THAT THE CMMR.'S 4/26/95 PROPOSED RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION WERE REC
EIVED WITH SUCH UNIVERSAL ALARM BY THE INVESTMENT COMMUNITY THAT STANDARD AND P
OOR'S PUT PACBELL ON CREDITWATCH AND MOODY'S PUT PACBELL IN THE CATEGORY OF "NE
GATIVE OUTLOOK," AND THAT DUFF & PHELPS ACTUALLY DOWNGRADED PACBELL. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
REPLY; ON THE PETITION OF GTEC RE PREAPPROVAL FOR FIBER BEYOND THE FEEDER *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN OPPOSITION TO PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION OF D8911031 *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; IN SUPPORT OF ITS PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031 TO REMOVE THE FIBER
PREAPPROVAL REQUIREMENT *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO.
|
|
Description:
REPLY; *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
REPLY; TO PETITION OF GTEC FOR REMOVAL OF PROAPPROVAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FIBER
BEYOND THE FEEDER *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
May 9, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
REPLY; *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 2-PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACIFIC BELL (2) FILED 5/4 AND 5/5/95
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
CP NATIONAL
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE WEST COAST INC.
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
EVANS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
TUOLUMNE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHIL QUIGLEY OF PTG WROTE A LTR. (ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE) TO CMMR. CONLON ON 5
/3/95. THE LTR. REFERENCED QUIGLEY'S MEETING W/COMMR. CONLON ON 5/1/95 ) SEE N
OTICE OF EX PARTE FILED 5/4/95), & DISCUSSED PACBELL'S POSITION ON OPENING ALL
MARKETS TO COMPETITION. QUIGLEY STATED THAT PACBELL SHOULD MOVE AS QUICKLY AS
POSSIBLE TO THE POINT WHERE ALL COMPANIES CAN OFFER THE SAME SERVICES ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
SISKIYOU TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 8, 1995
|
Filed By:
KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 5, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
PHIL QUIGLEY, PACIFIC TELESIS WROTE A LETTER (ATTACHED) WITH ATTACHMENTS TO CMM
R. CONLON ON 5/2/95. THE PURPOSE OF THE LETTER WAS TO EMPHASIZE THE CRITICAL I
SSUES CURRENTLY FACING THE COMMISSION AND PTG WHICH HAD BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE
COMMISSIONER ON 5/1/95 AND THE EFFECT OF THOSE ISSUES ON PACBELL'S COMMITMENT
TO CALIFORNIA INVESTMENT. THE LETTER POINTED OUT THE REACTION.,,,ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: ROSEVILLE
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 4, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, PACBELL, MET WITH CMMR. CONLON ON 5/1/95 AT THE INN OF THE OPERA I
N SF. PHIL QUIGLEY, PTG WAS ALSO PRESENT. WRITTEN MATERIALS USED AND ATTACHED
THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE IMPACT OF THE NRF STRUCTURE AND
THE RESULTS OF INTRALATA TOLL COMPETITION ON PACBELL'S FIRST QUARTER EARNINGS,
AND THE PROPOSED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 3, 1995
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
MICHAEL D. CAMPBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, ON 5/1/
95 IN SF. GREG GIERCZAK. LATER ON THE SAME DAY, CAMPBELL AND GIERCZAK ALSO CONT
ACTED CMMR. FESSLER AND HIS ADV, JOSE JIMINEZ, IN SF. THE SUBSTANCE OF THE COMM
UNICATIONS DURING BOTH MEETINGS WAS THE SAME. THE ROSEVILLE REPS. STATED THAT R
OSEVILLE SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO COMPLETE ITS RATE CASE BEFORE THE ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
May 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO MOTION OF AT&T FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PROTESTS OF GTEC AND PACBELL TO
PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 2-MCI
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: 2 MCI - LATE FILED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 2, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC AT&T
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE: AT&T - AUGMENTED NOTICE ORIGINALLY FILED ON 4/25/95 AND IN 4/27/95 DC
*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC GTEC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: GTEC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC SCLC/NCLR/FAA/
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE, NCLR, FAA, FCRA
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTED NOTICE ORIGINALLY FILED ON 4/25/95 AND IN 4/27/95 D.C. ON 4/20/95, R
ICHARD BROMLEY, AT&T MET WITH CMMR. KNIGHT OF SF. OTHERS WERE ALSO PRESENT. A
T&T DISCUSSED ROCHESTER TELEPHONE'S OPEN MARKET PLAN, THE LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPET
ITION TRIAL IN ROCHESTER, NY. AT&T CLAIMED THAT THE ROCHESTER TRIAL EMPHASIZED
THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUED COMMISSION OVERSIGHT OF LOCAL EXCHANGE,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
May 1, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCTA
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC GTEC-2
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: 2 GTEC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA
|
|
Description:
TIMOTHY MCCALLION, GTEC, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT ON 4/26/95 IN SF. JEFFREY KISS
EL, OF GTEC, WAS ALSO PRESENT. THE GTEC REPS DISCUSSED GTEC'S PROPOSAL FOR LOC
AL COMPETITION, THE KEY ELEMENTS OF ITS PLAN, AND THE NEED FOR THE CPUC TO ADOP
T A SOUND UNIVERSAL SERVICE PLAN PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPETITI
ON. GTEC NOTED THAT IT HAS DEVELOPED A COMPREHENSIVE UNIVERSAL,..ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH -SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC MCI
|
|
Description:
2 LATE FILED EX PARTE NOTICES: MCI
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH -SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
FILIPINOS FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTI
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH-SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
MEETING WITH CMMR CONLON AND ADV. RICHARD SMITH ON 4/25/95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE
PRESENT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO INFORM THE COMMISSION OF TIME-WARNE
R'S AND TCI'S DESIRE TO ENTER INTO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMMON CARRIERS, THE COMPANIES' VIEWS ON LOCAL COMPETITION RULES AUTHORIZED BY
THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION FOR ROCHESTER, NY, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 4/24/95, NATE DAVIS, OF MCI, CONTACTED CMMRS FESSLER AND CONLO
N IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. DAVIS DESCRIBED MCI METRO'S INTENTION TO BE A W
IRELINE LOCAL SERVICE PROVIDER IN CALIFORNIA AND OTHER STATES AND PROVIDED A DE
SCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY'S CURRENT INVESTMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND BUSINESS PLANS.
DAVIS INDICATED THAT CERTAIN REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS,...ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED. ON 4/24/95, NATE DAVIS, OF MCI, CONTACTED CMMR KNIGHT IN SF. OTH
ERS WERE PRSENT. DAVIS EXPLAINED THE MISSION OF MCI METRO, ITS DESIRE TO EXPAN
D INTO LOCAL SWITCHED SERVICE, THE LEVEL OF ITS COMMITTED AND PLANNED INVESTMEN
T, AND THE NUMBER OF CITIES IN WHICH IT IS BUILDING AND PLANS TO BUILD FIBER RI
NGS AND INSTALL SWITCHES. DAVIS INDICATED THAT TRUE NUMBER PORTABILITY,.ETC..*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
FILIPINO CIVIL RIGHTS ADVOCATE
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH-SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 28, 1995
|
Filed By:
KOREAN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, MARK SAVAGE & CARMELA CASTELLANO CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND ADV. JO
SE JIMENEZ IN SF. LATER, THEY ALSO CONTACTED CMMR CONLON AND ADV RICHARD SMITH
. SAVAGE/CASTELLANO DISCUSSED THE INTERVENOR'S POSITIONS ON THE TELECOMMUNICAT
ION UTILITIES' OBLIGATIONS TO MEET THE COMMISSION'S UNIVERSAL-SERVICE GOAL-95%
PENETRATION IN POOR, MINORITY, AND NON-ENGLISH -SPEAKING HOUSEHOLDS, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC AT&T
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: AT&T * AUGMENTATION REQUIRED
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC DEPT.
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: DEPT. OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS.
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PROTEST OF DRA OF AT&T'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
OF D9409065; REPLY ATTACHED *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 27, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, PACBELL, CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON ON 4/24/95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE P
RESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE SUBSIDY FLOWS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN PLACE AND HO
W THEY WILL BE EFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPETITION. PACBELL AL
SO INDICATED THAT THE INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION SHOULD BE MODIFIED RU
LES FOR ENTRY, INTERCONNECTION, INTERIM NUMBER PORTABILITY,....ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/21/95, JOHN GUELDNER, SENT WRITTEN MATERIAL (ATTACHED) TO CMMRS. FESSLER,
CONLON, KNIGHT, DUQUE AND THEIR ADVS. PACBELL DISCUSSED FACTORS THAT IT BELIEVE
S AFFECTS SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPETITION. THEY STATED THAT THE
RE IS A LARGE AMOUNT OF INTRALATA TOLL CALLS IN CALIFORNIA, ABOUT A THIRD OF AL
L TOLL CALLS IN THE U.S. ETC...
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED
|
|
Description:
ON 4/24/95, TIMOTHY MCCALLION AND MICHAEL MCDONOUGH FOR GTE MET WITH CMMR. FESS
LER AND HIS ADVISOR, JOSE JIMENEZ, IN SF. IN A SEPARATE MEETING, ON 4/24/95, MC
CALLION AND MCDONOUGH MET WITH CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADVISOR, RICHARD SMITH, ALS
O IN SF. THE GTEC REPRESENTATIVES DISCUSSED THE NEED FOR THE COMMISSION TO ADO
PT A SOUND UNIVERSAL SERVICE PLAN PRIOR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: 4/20/95, WILLIAM HARRELSON MET WITH RICHARD SMITH, CMMR CONLON'S A
DV. IN SF. HARRELSON PRAISED THE COMMISSION FOR STICKING WITH ITS PREVIOUSLY A
NNOUNCED SCHEDULE BY ISSUING DRAFT PROPOSED RULES OF LOCAL COMPETITION ON APRIL
14/95. HARRELSON COMMUNICATED MCI'S CONCURRENCE WITH THE DRAFT RULE7S APPROAC
H. BOWEN STATED THAT THE DRAFT RULE'S PROPOSAL TO CHARGE, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 26, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: 4/20/95, WILLIAM HARRELSON MET WITH JOSE JIMENEZ, CMMR FESSLER'S A
DV. AT STARS CAFE IN SF. HARRELSON PRAISED THE COMMISSION FOR STICKING WITH IT
S PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED SCHEDULE BY ISSUING DRAFT PROPOSED RULES OF LOCAL COMPET
ITION ON 4/14/95. HARRELSON COMMUNICATED MCI'S CONCURRENCE WITH THE DRAFT RULE
'S APPROACH. BOWEN STATED THAT THE DRAFT RULE'S PROPOSAL TO CHARGE, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. ON 4/20/95, RICHARD BROMLEY, AT&T MET WITH CMMR. KNIGHT
IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. AT&T CLAIMED THAT THE ROCHESTER TRIAL EMPHASIZED
THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTINUED COMMISSION OVERSIGHT OF LOCAL EXCHANGE COMPETITION.
AT&T PROVIDED THE PARTICIPANTS WITH A PRINTED DESCRIPTION OF THE LESSONS LEARNE
D. WRITTEN MATERIALS WERE USED AND ARE ATTACHED, ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
|
|
Description:
ON 4/21/95, RICHARD A. ELBRECHT, AND VIRGINIA J. TAYLOR, MET WITH CMMR. KNIGHT,
AND OTHERS, IN S.F. ELBRECHT DISCUSSED THE ECONOMIC POLICIES WHICH ARE THE BASI
S FOR THE DEPARTMENT'S RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING LOCAL COMPETITION, SAYING THAT
MANY THINK MANAGED COMPETITION HAS NOT WORKED WELL FOLLOWING THE AT&T DEVESTURE
. HE STATED THAT THE ALL REGULATION SHOULD BE PRO-COMPETITIVE, ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 25, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/20/95, LEE BAUMAN, MARLIN ARD & LYNN MOWERY MET WITH CMMR KNIGHT IN SF. O
THERS WERE PRESENT. PACIFIC CLARIFIED AT&T'S PRESENTATION ON ITS EXPERIENCE IN
THE NEW YORK LOCAL COMPETITION TRIAL WITH ROCHESTER. AT&T IMPLIED THAT IT COU
LD NOT MAKE MONEY ON THE RESALE OF LOCAL SERVICE BECAUSE RESALE WAS NOT PRICED
LOW ENOUGH BY ROCHESTER. PACIFIC STATED THIS WAS IMPROPER, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/19/95, LYNN MOWERY, INITIATED A TELEPHONE CONTACT WITH JOSE JIMENEZ, CMMR.
FESSLER'S ADV. LEE BAUMAN OF PACBELL WAS PRESENT. PACIFIC DISCUSSED PREFIX ASSI
GNMENT, UNBUNDLING, AND INTERCONNECTION POINTS. THEY URGED THAT DRAFT RULES ON
LOCAL COMPETITION MUST MAKE CLEAR THAT THE NXX SERVICE AREA DEFINITION WILL MAI
NTAIN THE CURRENT PRACTICE; ETC... *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC 2 PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 EX PARTE NOTICES: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCTA
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
REPLY
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO PROTEST OF DRA TO PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D9409065 *
|
|
|
Type:
RULING
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
ALJ/PULSIFER/PUC
|
|
Description:
DENIES GTEC'S MOTION TO OBTAIN A RULING ON THEIR PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF
D9412053 PRIOR TO THE COMMISSION'S ISSUANCE OF PROPOSED INTERIM RULES FOR COMME
NT *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/19/95, JOHN GUELDNER SENT WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE TO CMMRS FESSLER, CONLON,
KNIGHT & DUQUE. THE MATERIAL WAS PACIFIC'S FIRST QUARTER EARNINGS RELEASE, WH
ICH DISCUSSED PACIFIC'S VIEW OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS REFORM AND THE EFFECT OF THE
IRD AND THE 1995 ANNUAL NRF PRICE ADJUSTMENT ON REVENUES. THE RELEASE STATED
THAT REVENUES DECLINED BY 2.7% PRIMARILY FROM THE RATE BALANCING, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO DRA TO PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D94050
65 *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 24, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PROTEST OF DRA TO PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATIO
N OF D9409065 *
|
|
|
Type:
OPPOSITION
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
TO GTEC'S MOTION TO OBTAIN RULING ON GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF
D94-12-053 PRIOR TO COMMISSION ISSUANCE OF INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
SPENCER KAITZ CONTACTED CMMR KNIGHT AND HIS ADV BOB LANE ON 4/19/95 IN SF FOR T
HE PURPOSE OF INFORMING THE COMMISSION OF COMCAST'S DESIRE TO ENTER INTO BUSINE
SS IN CALIFORNIA AS A TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIER, THE COMPANY'S VIEWS ON
LOCAL COMPETITION RULES AUTHORIZED BY THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMIS
SION FOR ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, ETC.. OTHERS WERE PRESENT... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 21, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER CONTACTED CMMR FESSLER AND HIS ADV. JOSE JIMENEZ ON 4/18/95 IN SF
. LEE BAUMAN WAS PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED ITS PLAN FOR COMPETITION, "COMPET
ITION TO THE CORE". THE PLAN INTRODUCES LOCAL COMPETITION WITH UNBUNDLED ELEME
NTS ON 1/1/96, REFORMS REGULATION ALLOWING DOWNWARD PRICING FLEXIBILITY, FREEZE
S CUSTOMER PRICES FOR 3 YEARS, AND CONTINUES PACBELL'S COMMITMENT, ETC...*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 20, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC GTEC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: GTEC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 BY GTEC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
OPENING; ON THE PETITION OF GTEC REGARDING PREAPPROVAL FOR FIBER BEYOND THE FEE
DER *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CUCC
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED EX PARTE NOTICE: CUCC
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
OPENING; *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
OPENING; IN SUPPORT OF ITS PETITION TO MODIFY D89-10-031 TO REMOVE THE FIBER
PREAPPROVED REQUIREMENT *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
OPENING; *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP
|
|
Description:
OPENING; *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 19, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO GTEC'S AND PA BELL'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D89-10-031;
UN-REDACTED VERSION ATTACHED UNDER SEAL *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, CMMR. CONLON'S ADV., ON 4/13/95 IN SF.
OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED THE CUSTOMER CONFUSION THAT WILL OCCUR I
F NEW COMPETITORS DO NOT FOLLOW THE EXISTING INDUSTRY NUMBER ASSIGNMENT PROCEDU
RES. CURRENTLY THE FIRST THREE DIGITS OF THE TELEPHONE NUMBER, THE NXX CODE, AR
E ASSOCIATED WITH A UNIQUE RATE CENTER TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN LOCAL AND ...,ETC
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
IN OPPOSITION TO JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND TO SET PROCEDUR
AL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
BRIEF
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/THAYER/PUC
|
|
Description:
OPENING; RESPONDING TO THE PETITION OF GTEC TO MODIFY D8910031 FOR REMOVAL OF
FIBER PREAPPROVAL REQUIREMENTS *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
CITIZENS UTILTIES COMPANY
|
|
Description:
LATE FILED: ON 4/12/95, SUSAN REDNER WROTE A LETTER TO CMMRS FESSLER, CONLON,K
NIGHT & DUQUE, COPIES TO THEIR ADVISORS. CITIZENS NOTED THAT IT HAD PARTICIPAT
ED ACTIVELY IN THE CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS ON VARIOUS TELECOMMUNICA
TIONS ISSUES THAT TOOK PLACE DURING JANUARY THROUGH MARCH, 1995. CITIZENS AFFI
RMED ITS COMMITMENT TO CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE PROCESS OF, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO.
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULE FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
JENNY WONG, CONTACTED RICHARD SMITH, ADV. TO CMMR. CONLON; AND JOSE JIMENEZ, AD
V. TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 4/13/95 IN SF. FREDERICK HESSE OF GTEC WAS ALSO PRESENT
. GTEC'S REPS. ALSO CONTECTED ROBERT LANE, ADV. TO CMMR. KNIGHT, LATER ON THE S
AME DAY IN SF. GTEC DISCUSSED ITS PROPOSAL FOR LOCAL COMPETITION; THE KEY ELEME
NTS OF ITS PLAN; AND HOW IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTERIM RULES..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA-OREGON TELEPHONE
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE CO
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION OT OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 18, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON IN
TERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-12-053 BY ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE CO. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICE: CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE CO. (CALTEL) AND
PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INCORPORTED
|
|
Description:
OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 17, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PROTESTS OF GTEC AND PACBELL TO PETITION OF AT&T F
OR MODIFICATION OF D9409065; REPLY ATTACHED *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC PACBELL
|
|
Description:
2 NOTICES OF EX PARTE: PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON 4/14/95, KATHRYN A FUGERE, COUNSEL FOR CALTEL, WROTE A LETTER WITH ATTACHMEN
TS (ATTACHED) TO CMMR. CONLON. COPIES OF THE LETTER AND ATTACHMENTS WERE ALSO
DELIVERED TO ALJS CAREW, CRAGG AND WEISMEHL. THE WRITTEN MATERIAL SUMMARIZED C
ALTEL'S POSITION ON THE PAY STATION SERVICE CHARGE (PSSC) CALTEL STATED THAT T
HE PSSC WAS THE MOST BURDENSOME FORM OF COMPENSATION BECAUSE IT REQUIRES,.ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 14, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LYNN MOWERY, PACBELL, CONTACTED ROBER LANE, ADVISOR TO CMMR. KNIGHT, AND JOSE J
IMENEZ, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER, ON 4/12/95 IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. THE
PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS PACBELL'S 3/21 EX PARTE SUBMISSION TO THE
FCC ON ITS PENDING SECTION 214 APPLICAITONS. PACBELL DESCRIBED THE TECHNICAL
FUNCTIONALITY OF THE COMPONENTS OF HYBRID FIBER-COAX NETWORKS,..ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: DRA/KALINSKY/PUC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX-PARTE NOTICES: 2 CALTEL; 1 PACBELL
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
ROSEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY
|
|
Description:
OF D94-12-053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 13, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
JOHN GUELDNER, CONTACTED CMMR. KNIGHT ON 4/10/95 IN SF., OTHERS WERE PRESENT. O
N THE SAME DAY GUELDNER ALSO CONTACTED CMMR. CONLON AND HIS ADV. RICHARD SMITH.
THE SAME SUBJECT MATTER WS DISCUSSED IN BOTH MEETINGS. PACBELL DISCUSSED ITS PL
AN FOR COMPETITION, "COMPETITION TO THE CORE". PACBELL INDICATED THAT THE COMMI
SSIONIS PURSUING TWO CONTRADICTORY, BUT IMPORTANT OBJECTIVES: ..., ETC.
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/KALINSKY/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE MEETING DISCUSS THE JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET
PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ON INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, FILED BY COALITION
ON 4/3/95. ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSICIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON 4/10/95, THOMAS J. MACBRIDE, JR. AND KATHRYN A FUGERE, ATTYS FOR CALTEL, CON
TACTED JOSE JIMENEZ, ADVISOR TO CMMR. FESSLER IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. CAL
TEL'S REPS DISCUSSED PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE $.25 PAY ST
ATION SERVICE CHARGE WHICH WAS ADDRESSED IN D94-09-065 AND AT SUBSEQUENT CACD W
ORKSHOPS. CALTEL URGED THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER ALL OF THE ISSUES,ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, LYNN MOWERY, PACBELL, CONTACTED ROBERT LANE, ADVISOR TO CMMR. KNIGHT
, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. PACBELL DISCUSSED ITS PLAN FOR LOCAL COMPETITIO
N, TITTLED "COMPETITION TO THE CORE." PACBELL INDICATED THAT THE PLAN WOULD AL
LOW LOCAL COMPETITION TO START 1/1/96. THE PLAN INTEGRATES UNIVERSAL SERVICE A
ND NRF REFORM WITH LOCAL COMPETITION. PACBELL ALSO DISCUSSED THE NEED,...ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA ASSICIATION OF LONG
|
|
Description:
ON 4/10/95, THOMAS J. MACBRIDE, JR. AND KATHRYN A FUGERE, ATTYS FOR CALTEL, CON
TACTED CMMR. CONLON & HIS ADV, RICHARD SMITH, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESENT. CAL
TEL'S REPS DISCUSSED PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE $.25 PAY ST
ATION SERVICE CHARGE WHICH WAS ADDRESSED IN D94-09-065 AND AT SUBSEQUENT CACD W
ORKSHOPS. CALTEL URGED THE COMMISSION TO CONSIDER ALL OF THE ISSUES,ETC. *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 12, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC GTEC
|
|
Description:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9412053 BY GTEC *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCLTC ET AL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE: CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE TELECOMMUNCIATIONS; AT&T;
MFS INTELENET; TURN; CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION ASSN; MCI; SPRINT; DRA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CCLTC, AT&T, MFS, TURN, CCTA EX PARTE NOTICE: CCLTC, TCG, MCI,
CCTA
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 11, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCLTC
|
|
Description:
EX PARTE NOTICE: CCLTC
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC CCLTC, ET AL
|
|
Description:
NOTICE OF EX PARTE FILED BY CCLTC, TCG, CCTA, TURN, SPRINT
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
MFS INTELENET
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIOSN CORP.
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/KALINSKY/PUC
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
PETITION FOR MODIFICATION
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
OF D9412053 *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFOR
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
ON 4/5/95, JOSEPH FABER WROTE IDENTICAL LETTERS TO CMMRS FESSLER, CONLON, KNIGH
T AND DUQUE. COPIES WERE PROVIDED TO THEIR ADVISORS. FABER, WRITING ON BEHALF
OF A COALITION OF PARTIES, EXPRESSED WILLINGNESS OF COALITION MEMBERS TO WORK
WITH THE COMMISSION IN COMMENCING LOCAL TELEPHONE COMPETITION IN CALIFORNIA. T
HE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED INCLUDED A LIST OF COALITION MEMBERS; JOINT MOTION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORA
|
|
Description:
4/5/95 MEETING WITH CMMR FESSLER & ADV JOSE JIMINEZ IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITI
ONS OF A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTI
CIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN P
ROVIDING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS THE C
OMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
TELEPORT COMMUNICATION GROUP
|
|
Description:
4/5/95 MEETING WITH CMMR FESSLER & ADV JOSE JIMINEZ IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITI
ONS OF A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTI
CIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN P
ROVIDING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS THE C
OMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
4/5/95 MEETING WITH CMMR FESSLER & ADV JOSE JIMINEZ IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITI
ONS OF A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTI
CIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN P
ROVIDING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS THE C
OMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
4/5/95 MEETING WITH CMMR FESSLER & ADV JOSE JIMINEZ IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITI
ONS OF A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTI
CIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN P
ROVIDING LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS THE C
OMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
MFS INTELENET
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE FOR LARGE
|
|
Description:
4/7/95 MEETING WITH CMMR KNIGHT & ADV BOB LANE IN SF TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS O
F A COALITION OF PARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATION MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANT
S EXPLAINED THAT VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDI
NG LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE IN CALIFORNIA AND THAT THEY WOULD DO SO AS SOON AS T
HE COMMISSION ISSUED INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION, ETC.... *
|
|
|
Type:
MOTION
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.
|
|
Description:
TO OBTAIN RULING OF GTEC'S PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF D9412053 PRIOR TO COMMI
SSION'S ISSUANCE OF INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS L.P.
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
CALIFORNIA CABLE TELEVISION AS
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
EXPARTE
|
Filing Date:
April 10, 1995
|
Filed By:
TOWARD UTILITY RATE NORMALIZAT
|
|
Description:
ON 4/7/95, A MEETING WAS HELD WITH JODY LONDON, BOB LANE, RICHARD SMITH AND JOS
E JIMINEZ, ADVS. TO CMMRS. KNIGHT, CONLON AND FESSLER, IN SF. OTHERS WERE PRESE
NT. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING WAS TO DISCUSS THE POSITIONS OF A COALITION OF P
ARTIES ON PENDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS MATTERS. THE PARTICIPANTS EXPLAINED THAT
VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THIS COALITION STOOD READY TO BEGIN PROVIDING..., ETC.*
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
OF AT&T'S PETITION TO MODIFY D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
PROTEST
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
PACIFIC BELL
|
|
Description:
LIMITED; TO PETITION OF AT&T FOR MODIFICATION OF D94-09-065 *
|
|
|
Type:
RESPONSE
|
Filing Date:
April 7, 1995
|
Filed By:
DRA/MICKIEWICZ/PUC
|
|
Description:
TO JOINT MOTION TO OPEN RULEMAKING PROCEEDING AND SET PROCEDURE SCHEDULE ON
INTERIM RULES FOR LOCAL COMPETITION *
|
|
|
Type:
CALENDAR
|
Filing Date:
April 6, 1995
|
Filed By:
DOCKET/ALJ/PUC
|
|