All Documents For Proceeding R0206001 Date Filed: June 6, 2002

Number of Documents: 419 Type: REPORT Filing Date: November 13, 2006 Filed By: Southern California Edison Company Description: Filing in compliance with O.P.13 of Decision 05-11-009. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: July 6, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 14 of D05-11-009: Completed Research Report. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: June 9, 2006 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Refrigerant Based Energy Storage for Air Conditionng Report per O.P. 13 of Decision 05-11-009. Type: REPORT Filing Date: May 25, 2006 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Completed Research Report Not Previously Filed in Accordance with Ordering Paragraph 14 of D05-11-009. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: May 9, 2006 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: (Pursuant to O.P.13 of Decision 05-11-009) - Evaluation of 2005 statewide large nonresidential day-ahead and reliability demand response program report. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: May 2, 2006 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: (Per D.05-11-009, O.P. 13) Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 24, 2006 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: (pursuant to O.P.13 of D.05-11-009). Type: AMENDMENT Filing Date: April 18, 2006 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: 2nd; to Request for Compensation. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 10, 2006 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: per O.P.13 of D.05-11-009 (Demand Response Research Reports). Type: AMENDMENT Filing Date: March 22, 2006 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: to Request for Compensation for Substantial Contribution to Phase 2 Rulings and Decisions. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: February 24, 2006 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Per Decision 05-11-009, O.P. 13. - Air conditioner cycling summer discount program evaluation study. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: January 20, 2006 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: for compensation for substantial contribution to Phase 2 rulings and decisions. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: December 1, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: per O.P 13 of D.05-11-009. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: December 1, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with D05-11-009: Filing of a List of Completed Researh Reports and Completed Researh Reports Not Previously Filed. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: November 21, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs (for October 2005). Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 14, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: reply; on the draft decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 14, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on Draft Decision of ALJ Cooke. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Draft Decision of ALJ Cooke. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on the proposed decision closing the Rulemaking. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on the draft decision of ALJ Cooke closing this Rulemaking. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on Draft Decision closing Rulemaking and identifying future activities related to Demand Response. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 31, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Residential Automated Demand Response System (ADRS) Pilot Economic Analysis Report. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 31, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: of Completed Research Report entitled "Impact Evaluation of the California Statewide Pricing Pilot." [Report may be downloaded at www.energy.ca.gov/demandresponse/documents/index.html ] Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 31, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Final Report + Program Impact Evaluation + Post SPP Rate Choice Assessment Research. Type: MOTION Filing Date: October 27, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for authorization to continue to operate 2005 demand response programs for first three months of 2006. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 21, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for September 2005. Type: DRAFT DECISION Filing Date: October 19, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: Comments are due November 8, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: MOTION Filing Date: October 6, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: for Authorization to continue to operate 2005 Demand Response Programs in the First Quarter of 2006 pending a Final Decision on (this) Application. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 5, 2005 Filed By: USCL CORPORATION Description: On October 1, 2005, Tom D. Tamarkin, President of USCL Corporation, sent an email with four documents attached to ALJ Cooke. On the same day of October 1, 2005, Tamarkin sent the same documents to Cmmrs. Kennedy and Peevey, via Federal Express, to deliver on October 3, 2005. Copies of the written materials and the text of the email are attached to the notice. Type: REPLY Filing Date: September 23, 2005 Filed By: USCL CORPORATION Description: to PG&E's response to motion to add minimum functionality requirement. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: September 21, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for August 2005. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: September 21, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Motion of USCL Corp. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: September 20, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to USCL Motion to Add Minimum Functionality Requirement Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: September 9, 2005 Filed By: USCL CORPORATION Description: On September 6, 2005, Brian Cragg, counsel for USCL Corporation (USCL), spoke by telephone with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey. Cragg stated that USCL was filing a petition to intervene and a motion requesting the Commission to add another functionality requirement to the six advanced metering infrastructure functions currently identified in this proceeding. Cragg described how the motion asked the Commission to require installation of a universal, nonproprietary, interactive interface in the customer meter and how such an interface would greatly enhance the Commission's program. Type: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Filing Date: September 7, 2005 Filed By: USCL CORPORATION Description: Amended; (of Petition to Intervene; and Motion to Add Minimum Functionality Requirement, filed 9/6/05.) Type: MOTION Filing Date: September 6, 2005 Filed By: USCL CORPORATION Description: to Add Minimum Functionality Requirement. (Per ALJ Cooke - Responses should be filed no later than 09/22/05. MMN) Type: PETITION Filing Date: September 6, 2005 Filed By: USCL CORPORATION Description: to intervene. (Per ALJ Cooke - Responses should be filed no later than 09/22/05. MMN) Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: August 22, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for July 2005. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: July 21, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for June 2005. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: July 5, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Joint; on Draft Opinion dated June 14, 2005. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: June 21, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for May 2005. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: June 17, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On June 15, 2005, Bill Stock, Director, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Peter Hanson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Jana Corey, Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. PG&E representatives asked that the Commission continue to resolve issues and proceedings associated with AMI in order to keep the project on a timely schedule. Type: RULING Filing Date: June 14, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: Opinion adopting an incremental budget for the statewide pricing pilot, advanced demand response system, and information display pilot. Comments are due July 4, 2005; and reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: June 10, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: On June 7, 2005, Bruce C. Foster of Southern California Edison Company (Edison) met with Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Grueneich, and Stephen St. Marie, advisor to Cmmr. Bohn, and Michael R. Hoover, Lynda Ziegler, Gene E. Rodrigues, Mark Wallenrod, Jennifer Hasbrouck and Don Arambula, for Edison. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Edison's representatives presented an overview of Edison's application for approval of demand response programs, goals and budgets for 2006-2008, filed June 1, 2005, and Edison's application for approval of 2006-2008 energy efficiency program plans and public goods charge and procurement funding requests, filed June 2, 2005. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: May 20, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for April 2005. Type: RULING Filing Date: April 29, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: Grants SDG&E's January 15, 2005 motion for protective order and motion to file under seal and PG&E's March 15, 2005 motion to file under seal, as set forth. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 21, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for March 2005. Type: RULING Filing Date: April 18, 2005 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: on the budget for the statewide pricing pilot, advanced demand response system, and information display pilot. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: April 13, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On April 11, 2005, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Kennedy in San Francisco. Also present were Robert Bemesderfer, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Tom King, Executive Vice President, Tom Bottorff, Senior Vice President, Customer Service and Revenue, Jana Corey, Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Bottorff stated that PG&E's business case has been updated and is considerably stronger that the one filed last October. Bottorff stated that the case is so strong that nearly 80 percent of the costs are now being offset by operational savings. Bottoff explained the significance of the much-improved business case and stated that AMI has been successfully deployed in more than 20 utility service areas nationwide. Bottorff also described PG&E's request for the Commission approval to launch an initial deployment for an AMI project at a cost of $49 million. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: March 21, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on interruptible load programs, rotating outage activities, and demand response programs for Feb 2005. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: March 18, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On March 15, 2005, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, and Tom Bottorff, Senior Vice President, Customer Service and Revenue, Jana Cory, Director, AMI Initiative, and Michael Wiebe, Consultant, for PG&E. Bottorff stated that PG&E's business case has been updated and is considerably stronger than the one filed last October. Bottorff also reported on the status of PG&E's Request for Proposals on AMI. Bottorff also described PG&E's request for the Commission approval to launch an initial deployment for an AMI project at a cost of $49 million. Type: BRIEF Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: Initial; concerning implementation of critical peak pricing. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER Description: for Compensation. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for Leave to File Confidential Material Under Seal; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Unredacted Version of Updated Preliminary AMI Business Case Analysis. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: March 15, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Updated Preliminary AMI Business Case Analysis (PUBLIC VERSION). Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: February 23, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: THIS IS A CORRECTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON FEBRUARY 2, 2005, AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF FEBRUARY 4, 2005. On January 27, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Jana Cory, Director, AMI Initiative, and Susan Dowling, Manager, ETS, for PG&E. A document titled - Preliminary AMI Timing Estimate' (attached to the notice) was used. Cory discussed PG&E's proposed AMI pre-deployment schedule, the product evaluation process and the steps PG&E is taking to evaluate due diligence. Dowling discussed the project budget and the recording of costs in the AMDRA account. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: February 22, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Report on Interruptible Load Programs, Rotating Outage Activities and Demand Response Programs for January 2005. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: February 18, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to SDG&E's motion for clarification. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: February 15, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Comments on Proposed Management Agreement between PG&E and the California Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority in connection with the Demand Response Partnership Program. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: February 15, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: [in compliance with D04-11-034, Ordering Paragraph 3] Cost Effectiveness Analysis of the Demand Reserve Partnership Program. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: February 11, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Description: Budget Request concerning 2005 Statewide Pricing Pilot for Residential and small Commercial Customers. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: February 11, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Corrections to January 12, 2005 Supplemental Filing (PUBLIC VERSION). Type: MOTION Filing Date: February 11, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for Clarification of Decision 05-01-056. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: February 11, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Motion for Protective Order; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Attachment 1 to the Corrections to January 12, 2005 Supplemental Filing, filed concurrently herewith. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: February 4, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Proposed Management Services Agreement Between PG&E and the California Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority in connection with the demard reserves partnership program [in accordance with D04-11-034, Ordering Paragraph 2]. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: February 2, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: LATE FILED. On January 27, 2005, Brian Cherry, Director of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Jana Cory, Director, AMI Initiative, and Susan Dowling, Manager, ETS, for PG&E. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. Cory discussed PG&E's proposed AMI pre-deployment schedule, the product evaluation process and the steps PG&E is taking to evaluate due diligence. Dowling discussed the project budget and the recording of costs in the AMDRA account. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 25, 2005 Filed By: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION Description: REPLY; Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 24, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Reply Type: REPLY Filing Date: January 24, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Comments on Draft Decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 24, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: reply; on Draft Decision approving demand response programs for 2005. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 24, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on December 28, 2004 draft decision adopting 2005 demand response programs. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: January 21, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 19, 2005 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: on Proposed Decision of ALJ Cooke. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 19, 2005 Filed By: THE ENERGY COALITION Description: Reply; on Draft Decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Draft Decision of Cmmr Peevey and ALJ Cooke. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION Description: On January 12, 2005, William Booth for California Manufacturers & Technology Association met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Pres. Peevey in two separate meetings in San Francisco. Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, participated in the meeting with Pres. Peevey. Also present was Keith McCrea for California Large Energy Consumers Association. Booth and McCrea discussed the assigned commissioner¿s ruling issued on December 8, 2004. Booth and McCrea expressed their concerns about the need for mandatory CPP programs for the upcoming summer and explained that many of the largest customers engaged in manufacturing and process industries were not in a position to shift load. Booth stated that any proposal to terminate the interruptible program would be detrimental to maintaining system reliability. McCrea emphasized that the largest customers over 500kW tended to have flatter loads and that demand response programs would be directed at customer classes which drive the peak. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on draft decision approving demand response program for 2005. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR Description: opening; on the draft decision of Cmmr. Peevey and ALJ Cooke approving 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Description: on the draft opinion approving 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION Description: on Draft Decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on the draft decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 18, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on December 28, 2004 draft decision adopting 2005 demand response programs. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 14, 2005 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER Description: on the draft decision of Cmmr. Peevey and ALJ Cooke. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: January 12, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case Supplemental Filing (PUBLIC VERSION). Type: SUPPLEMENTAL Filing Date: January 12, 2005 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Supplemental Preliminary Business Case Filing [pursuant to the November 24, 2004 ruling]. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: January 12, 2005 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for protective order; confidential materials attached and filed under seal, namely, Appendices A and B to the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case Supplemental Filing, filed concurrently herewith. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: January 12, 2005 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Revised Preliminary Analysis of Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case. Type: REPORT Filing Date: January 11, 2005 Filed By: ENERGY/CHAN/PUC Description: Final; Working Group 2 demand response program evaluation - program year 2004. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: December 31, 2004 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER Description: LATE FILED. On December 23, 2004, Steven Moss, Executive Director of San Francisco Community Power (SF Power), sent to ALJ Cooke comments, via email (copies attached to the notice). The comments related to Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) `Proposal Concerning Working Group 2 Programs and Related Issues'. SF Power noted that the utility does not provide sufficient details to fully comment on its proposal. SF Power noted that SF Power is currently implementing energy efficiency, demand-response, and renewable programs in the City. Moss indicated that it is unclear how PG&E is defining `cooperative'. SF Power explained that there are conflicting state and federal statutes relating to what constitutes a cooperative structure, which makes it difficult for large number of parties to participate in `traditional' cooperative arrangements. Moss also stated that, by willfully ignoring SF Power's current activities, PG&E seems to be using this initiative both to obtain load shifts, and to disrupt the operations of an existing, community-based and the CPUC-funded entity. SF Power commented that, in this respect, it would seem as if PG&E should be required to follow similar `affiliate' rules as those proposed for energy efficiency measures. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 30, 2004 Filed By: ENERGY PRODUCERS AND USERS COALITION Description: to intervene. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 30, 2004 Filed By: COGENERATION ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA Description: to intervene. Type: DRAFT DECISION Filing Date: December 28, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Opinion approving 2005 demand response goals, programs and budgets. Comments are due January 17, 2005; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: December 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 15, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; to TURN's comments on 20/20 program proposals. Type: REPLY Filing Date: December 15, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Comments of TURN. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 8, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on utility 20/20 program proposals for 2005. Type: RULING Filing Date: December 8, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Directs the filing of rate design proposals for large customers. Applications should be filed by January 20, 2005. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: December 1, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Proposal for a 20/20 Incentive Program for Residential and Small Commercial Customers who enroll in Power Pledge for Summer 2005. Type: SUPPLEMENT Filing Date: December 1, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: to additional demand response program proposals for 2005. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: December 1, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to November 5, 2004 ruling: 20/20 program proposal. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: November 30, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Term Sheet Between PG&E and the California Power Authority [pursuant to D04-11-034]. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 24, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Calls for a technical conference, delays filing date of utility advanced metering infrastructure applications to March 15, 2005, and directs the filing of rate design proposals for large customers by January 12, 2005. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: November 23, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Errata to Response filed October 15, 2004. [Filed per authorization from ALJ Cooke.] Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: November 22, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 22, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on additional demand response programs proposed for 2005-2008 [pursuant to November 5, 2004 ruling]. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: November 18, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: to PG&E Motion for extension of time to file advanced metering infrastructure application. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 16, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Reply; on demand response programs proposals for 2005-2008. Type: REPLY Filing Date: November 16, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to Comments on its Oct 15, 2004 and Oct 29, 2004 Demand Response Program Proposals. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 16, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: reply; on utility demand response programs proposed for 2005-2008. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 16, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; regarding summer 2005 demand response proposals. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 16, 2004 Filed By: SILICON VALLEY MANUFACTURING GROUP Description: reply; on proposal of PG&E concerning working group 2 programs and related issues. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: November 15, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Proposal for a 20/20 Incentive Program for Commercial and Industrial Customers to address system reliability needs in Summer 2005. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: November 15, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to November 5, 2004 assigned commissioner's ruling: Additional Demand Response Program Proposals. Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 15, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for extension of time to file advanced metering infrastructure application. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: November 15, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Additional Demand Response Program Proposals for 2005 as required by ACR issued Nov 5, 2004. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 9, 2004 Filed By: ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES Description: on utility filings concerning working group 2 programs and related issues. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: November 8, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: (PUBLIC and CONFIDENTIAL VERSIONS) Supplemental filing regarding Preliminary AMI Business Case Analysis - Appendix B. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 5, 2004 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: on PG&E, Edison, and SDG&E's demand response program proposals for 2005-2008 [pursuant to th June 2, 2004 ruling]. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 5, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Directs utilities to file additional 2005 programs, budgets, and megawatt goals. Filings are due by November 15, 2004. Comments on the filings may be filed by November 22, 2004; reply comments - November 29, 2004. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 5, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: PUBLIC VERSION. (CONFIDENTIAL VERSION CONTAINS PROTECTED MATERIALS [filed under seal].) Comments on utility demand response programs proposed for 2005-2008. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 2, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: Grants in part PG&E and SDG&E leave to file under seal. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 29, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Filing to Propose 2005-2008 Reliability Triggered Demand Response Programs. Type: RULING Filing Date: October 29, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Continues availability of tariffs and programs under the statewide pricing pilot, as set forth. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 22, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Preliminary Analysis of Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: October 22, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Motion for Protective Order; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Appendix C to the Preliminary Analysis Regarding Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case filed concurrently herewith. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 22, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: (PUBLIC VERSION) Preliminary Analysis regarding Advanced Metering Infrastructure Business Case. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 15, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: (PUBLIC VERSION) Proposal concerning Working Group 2 Programs and Related Issues. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: October 15, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: REDACTED. Preliminary AMI bisuness case analysis [pursuant to the July 21, 2004 ruling]. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: October 15, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: for protective order; confidential material attached and filed under seal, namely, Appendix B - Case Results (Cases B1-B19) to preliminary AMI business case analysis. Type: LAW & MOTION Filing Date: October 15, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Motion for Protective Order; Confidential Materials Attached and Filed Under Seal, namely, Appendix C to the Proposal filed concurrently herewith. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 15, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Response to ALJ's Ruling approving 2004 Schedule and Plan for the Statewide Pricing Pilot Evaluation and Customer Research Activities and establishing process for evaluation of proposed 2005 Price Respondive Demand. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 15, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Demand Response Program Proposals for 2005-2008. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: October 14, 2004 Filed By: ENERGY/CHAN/PUC Description: Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation - Process Evaluation Update. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 12, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On October 6, 2004, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Thomas Bottorff, Senior Vice President of Customer Service and Revenue, for PG&E. Tomcala and Bottorff updated the Commission on the status of PG&E's AMI business planning and also reported on the issuance of PG&E's Request for Proposals on AMI. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: October 8, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & EECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: to ALJ Ruling regarding Statewide Pricing Pilot Decommissioning and Reply to Comments of ORA on the Joint Utilities Formal Strategy to close the Statewide Pricing Pilot for Residential and Small Commercial Customers. Type: RULING Filing Date: September 29, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: Regarding Statewide Pricing Pilot Decommissioning. Responses to the Ruling should be filed not later than October 1, 2004. [EXTENSION GRANTED - On Sept 29, 2004, ALJ Cooke orally granted the request of PG&E to extend the Response deadline to Oct 8, 2004. MMN] Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: September 22, 2004 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: on the joint utilities formal strategy to close the statewide pricing pilot for residential and small commercial customers. [EXTENSION GRANTED - On Sept 29, 2004, ALJ Cooke orally granted the Request of PG&E to extend the time to file Reply Comments hereto to Oct 8, 2004. MMN] Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: September 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: September 2, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Joint Utilities Formal Strategy to close the Statewide Pricing Pilot for Residential and Small Commercial customers. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: August 23, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: REPORT Filing Date: August 11, 2004 Filed By: ENERGY/CHAN/PUC Description: Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation - Nonparticipant Market Survey Report. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: July 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: RULING Filing Date: July 21, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Directs the utilities to file their preliminary analysis in this, or its successor, docket, as set forth. The filing is due October 15, 2004. The utilities shall file applications that finalize their analysis set forth, no later than December 15, 2004. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: June 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: RULING Filing Date: June 4, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Invites filing of Advice Letters to implement additional demand response programs in Summer 2004. Type: RULING Filing Date: June 2, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: approving 2004 schedule and plan for the statewide pricing pilot evaluation and customer research activities and establishing process for evaluation of proposed 2005 price responsive demand programs. Utilities shall file detailed 2005 program descriptions and budgets on October 15, 2004; comments on the proposed programs shall be filed on November 5, 2004, with reply comments filed November 16, 2004. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: May 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: May 7, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On May 4, 2004, William Stock, Chief of Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Thomas Bottorff, Senior Vice President of Customer Service and Revenue, Karen Tomcala, Vice President of Regulatory Relations, and Anlin Ting-Mason, Vice President of Business Systems and Energy Programs, for PG&E. Bottorff stated that PG&E is continuing its business case development. Bottorff noted that the Commission should decide cost recovery issues concurrent with decisions regarding AMI deployment. Ting-Mason stated that PG&E was concerned about the capacity value as well as the additional demand reduction issues that the recent draft AMI Workshop report suggested. Tomcala highlighted the fact that the process going forward needs to be very focused so that the Commission can make a timely decision. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on staff draft report - Recommended analysis framework for the business case analysis of advanced metering infrastructure. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on staff's recommended analysis framework for business case analysis of advanced metering infrastructure. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on draft report regarding recommended analysis framework for business case analysis of advanced metering infrastructure. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2004 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: on draft staff report on recommended framework for the business case analysis of advanced metering infrastructure. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION Description: Reply; on Modifications to Utility Demand Response Programs. Type: RULING Filing Date: May 3, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Clarifies direction to utilities to implement the demand reserve partnership. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 30, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Reply; on Comments addressing utility plans to achieve demand response goals. Type: REPLY Filing Date: April 30, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: to Comments of parties regarding its plan to achieve Demand Response Goals for 2004 and 2005. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 30, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: reply; on utility demand response targets. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 30, 2004 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: reply; to the comments re modifications to demand response programs for 2004 and new programs for 2005, and working group 2 demand response program evaluation filed April 8, 2004. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 30, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; re PG&E's proposed modifications to demand response programs for 2004 and new programs for 2005. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 30, 2004 Filed By: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Description: reply; on utility plans to achieve demand response goals. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 29, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: reply; on March 31 plans proposing working group 2 program modifications [pursuant to February 25, 2004 ruling]. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: April 28, 2004 Filed By: ENERGY/KANESHIRO/PUC Description: Errata to Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation filed April 13, 2004. [Filed per instructions from ALJ Cooke]. Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 22, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: for acceptance of late-filed comments [on March 31 Plans Proposing Working Group 2 Program Modifications]; comments attached. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on demand Response programs. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 21, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: on the March 31, 2004 utility filings re modifications to demand response programs for 2004 and new programs for 2005. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 21, 2004 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: regarding modifications to demand response programs for 2004, etc. [pursuant to the February 25, 2004 ruling]. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 21, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on utility demand response targets. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 21, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION Description: on utility plans to achieve demand response goals. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on the Plan of PG&E and SDG&E to achieve Demand Response Goals for 2004 and 2005. Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 20, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ENERGY/CHAVEZ/PUC Description: [mailed 4/14/04]. DRAFT. Recommended analysis framework for the business case analysis of advanced metering infrastructure. Type: REPORT Filing Date: April 13, 2004 Filed By: ENERGY/KANESHIRO/PUC Description: Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 9, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Reply; Type: REPLY Filing Date: April 9, 2004 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/CPUC Description: To the Comments of Parties on the ALJ's Ruling Seeking Input on Real-Time Pricing Design Issues Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 9, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: Reply Comments on the March 15, 2004 ALJ Ruling Seeking Input on Real-Time Pricing Design Issues Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 9, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Reply Comments in Response to ALJ's Ruling Seeking Input on Real-Time Pricing Design Issues Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 9, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Reply; Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 1, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Opening; regarding the demand response targets adopted in R.03-06-032. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: April 1, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: [pursuant to the November 24, 2003, and February 25, 2004, rulings] Plan regarding modifications to demand response programs for 2004 and new programs for 2005. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: April 1, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Plan to achieve demand response goals. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 1, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: in response to ALJ 's ruling seeking input on real time pricing. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 1, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Opening; in response to ALJ Ruling seeking input on real-time pricing design issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 30, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Opening; concerning RTP design issues. Type: RULING Filing Date: March 30, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Provides guidance to facilitate an agency agreement between the utilities and Department of Water Resources and directs utilities to take certain steps to implement the demand reserve partnership. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 30, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: on March 15, 2004 ALJ Ruling seeking input on real-time pricing design issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 30, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in response to ALJ's ruling seeking input on real-time pricing design issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 30, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION Description: on ALJ's ruling seeking input on real-time pricing design issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 30, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES Description: on ALJ's ruling seeking input on real-time pricing design issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 30, 2004 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: on ALJ's ruling seeking input on real-time pricing design issues. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: March 26, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Jointly submitted 2004 Customer Enrollment, Support, and Marketing Plan in compliance with OP 1.A. of D04-01-012 Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: March 22, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: RULING Filing Date: March 15, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: Requests opening comments by March 30, and reply comments - April 9, 2004, on real-time pricing design issues. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: March 2, 2004 Filed By: ONSITE ENERGY CORP. Description: Joint; in response to R02-06-001 addressing the creation of a Demand Reserves Program Implementation Plan. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: February 27, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Final 2003 Expenditures Report; in compliance with OP4 of D04-01-012 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: February 26, 2004 Filed By: CELERITY ENERGY, INC. Description: regarding the disposition of the demand reserves partnership program. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: February 26, 2004 Filed By: AUTOMATED POWER EXCHANGE, INC. Description: to January 26, 2004 ALJ's ruling seeking status reports on implementation of the demand reserves partnership program. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: February 26, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER POWER AND CONSERVATION FINANCING AUTHORITY Description: on the ruling of ALJ DeUlloa. Type: RULING Filing Date: February 25, 2004 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Clarifies the November 24, 2003 ruling. Provides that Respondents' Plans shall be served on March 31, 2004 but may be filed with the Docket Office on April 1, 2004. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: February 23, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs for the month of January 2004; pursuant to OP24 and 25 of D03-06-032 Type: RULING Filing Date: February 19, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC COM/PEEVEY/PUC Description: providing guidance for the advanced metering infrastructure business case analysis. Type: REPORT Filing Date: February 17, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Status Report on Implementation of the Demand Reserves Partnership Program; in response to January 26, 2004 ALJ's Ruling. Type: REPORT Filing Date: February 17, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Status Report on Implementation of the Demand Reserves Program, pursuant to the January 26, 2004 Ruling of ALJ DeUlloa. Type: REPORT Filing Date: February 17, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on Status of the Demand Reserves Programm, in compliance with the ALJ's Ruling dated January 26, 2004 Type: RULING Filing Date: February 9, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/COOKE/PUC Description: updating service list and notifying parties of intent to move to electronic service. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: February 2, 2004 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Completed 2003 Statewide Pricing Pilot Customer Research Reports in compliance with O.P. 5 of Decision 04-01-012. Type: RULING Filing Date: January 29, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/DEULLOA/PUC Description: correcting filing and service date of Responses to Status Reports to February 26, 2004. Type: RULING Filing Date: January 26, 2004 Filed By: ALJ/DEULLOA/PUC Description: SoCal Edison Co., PG&E Co., and SDG&E Co., shall, on or before Feb 16, 2004, serve and file a status report addressing the issues in this Ruling.[On Feb 9, 2004, ALJ Cooke, observing that Feb 16 was a legal holiday, changed ghe due date to Feb 17, 2004. MMN] [For date of filing of timely Response to status report, please refer to ALJ DeUlloa Ruling dated Jan 29, 2004. MMN.] Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: January 21, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: January 20, 2004 Filed By: BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA Description: On January 15, 2004, Les Spahnn, Administrator of the Building Owners and Managers Association of California (BOMAC), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were Brian Prusnek, advisor to Cmmr. Kennedy, and Clyde Murley, with Grueneich Resource Advocates on behalf of BOMAC. A copy of the prior filing with the Commission was used. Spahnn and Murley pointed out obstacles under existing tariffs and rules faced by the private office building sector with respect to transmitting time-of-use or real-time price signals to building tenants and the associated adverse consequences for demand response capability, and expressed a desire to work collaboratively with the Commission and other interested parties in finding ways to reduce these obstacles in order to expand the demand response capability within the private office building sector. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: January 16, 2004 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Preliminary List of Potential Costs and Benefits of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) and Comments on AMI complementing A/C Cycling and Demand/Response. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: January 16, 2004 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: Proposal on Advanced Metering Infrastructure. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: January 16, 2004 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: Advanced Metering Infrastructure Proposal per Assigned Commissioner's Ruling and Scoping Memo Phase 2. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: January 16, 2004 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Proposal concerning potential costs and benefits of Advanced Metering Infrastructure and advanced load control issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 29, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on draft opinion approving 2004 budget request for the statewide pricing pilot for residential and small commercial customers. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: December 22, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: RULING Filing Date: December 9, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: Modifies schedule, as follows: the due date for filing of parties' proposals on AMI, as set forth, is moved from December 22, 2003 to January 16, 2004. Type: DRAFT DECISION Filing Date: December 9, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: Opinion approving 2004 budget request for the statewide pricing pilot for residential and small commercial customers. Comments are due December 29, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: SCOPING RULING Filing Date: November 24, 2003 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Affirms that this is a ratesetting proceeding. Sets the following schedule: 12/22/03 - parties file proposal on AMI, workshops - January-February 2004, workshop report - 30 days after workshops end, parties file responses - 21 days after report released/submission; 3/31/04 -respondents file plans re 2007 targets; no evidentiary hearing in Phase 2. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: November 21, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: November 17, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: to the Comments of ORA to Budget Request concerning 2004 Statewide Pricing Pilot for Residential and small commercial customers. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 7, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: Allows Joint Utilities to submit reply to ORA's response to budget request concerning 2004 statewide pricing pilot for residential and small commercial customers: the reply is due November 17, 2003. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 4, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: in response to the budget request of the joint utilities concerning 2004 statewide pricing pilot for residential and small commercial customers. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: October 31, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Augmented Joint Utility Plan to Evaluate the Impacts of Automated Demand Response Systems in accordance with ALJ DeUlloa's August 14, 2003 Ruling. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: October 21, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: October 15, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Budget; concerning 2004 Statewide Pricing Pilot for Residential and Small Commercial Customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on the ruling setting forth scope of Phase 2. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: to ruling setting forth the scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION Description: on Ruling [of September 19, 2003] setting forth scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION Description: on Ruling [of September 19, 2003] setting forth scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: on the Ruling [of September 19, 2003] setting forth scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Ruling setting forth scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: on Ruling setting forth scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA Description: on scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: on the scope of Phase 2. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 6, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on the ruling setting forth scope of Phase 2. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: September 22, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: [in compliance with Ordering Paragraphs 24 and 25 of D03-06-032]: Monthly Report on Demand Response Programs. Type: RULING Filing Date: September 19, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC ALJ/DEULLOA/PUC CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Sets forth scope of Phase 2; comments may be filed by October 6, 2003. Type: RULING Filing Date: August 14, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/DEULLOA/PUC Description: Approves with modification Joint Utilities' ADRS proposal subject to the filing of an augmented implementation plan; the filing is due by October 15, 2003. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: August 5, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Net Revenue Loss Recovery Proposal in compliance with O.P. 19 of Decision 03-03-036. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: August 5, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: for Compensation for substantial contribution to Phase 1 Decisions 03-03-036 and 03-06-032. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: August 5, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 19 of D03-06-032: filing regarding the proposal of the ORA for recovery of net revenue loss resulting from participation in voluntary critical peak pricing tariffs for large customers. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: August 5, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: regarding the proposal of ORA for recovery of net revenue loss resulting from participation in voluntary critical peak pricing tariffs for large customers. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: August 1, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: in compliance with Ordering Paragraph 2 of D03-03-036: Joint statewide pricing pilot evaluation plan. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: July 28, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA POWER AUTHORITY Description: Reply; to [Edison's] plan to implement the California Power Authority's Demand Response Partnership Program (Advice Letter 1720-E). Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: July 21, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: concerning agricultural accounts. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: July 21, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in Response to Decision 03-06-032, O.P. 11. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 17, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: On July 16, 2003, Jason Reiger, staff counsel, Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present were ALJ Carew and Steve Ross, staff analyst, for ORA. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. ORA representatives stated that it was filing Critical Peak Pricing testimony in Southern California Edison Companys general rate case, and explained the details of the testimony and how it was to augment, not replace, ORAs advancement of CPP policies in this rulemaking proceeding. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: July 1, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Joint Utility Plan to evaluate the impacts of Automated Demand Response Systems in accordance with O.P. 3 of Decision 03-03-036. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: June 16, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: in compliance with ordering paragraph 14 of D03-03-036: Fist Joint Utility Bi-Monthly Report Summarizing Program Progress. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: June 6, 2003 Filed By: UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: On June 3, 2003, Marcel Hawiger, attorney for The Utility Reform Network (TURN), met with Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, and Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in three separate meetings in San Francisco. Also present was Sara Steck Myers, attorney for TURN. The meeting with David Gamson was followed by an email (attached to the notice). Hawiger and Myers indicated TURNs support for the alternate of Cmmr. Lynch addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Hawiger and Myers stated that TURNs concerns with the draft decision, especially with respect to issues of parity between large and small customers with respect to advanced meters or demand response tariffs, had been recognized and addressed in the alternate. In particular, Hawiger and Myers stated that the alternate, as opposed to the draft decision, better reflects the actual record on and likely results from demand response programs. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 29, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: of Cmmr. Lynch addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 29, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on the Alternate Draft Decision of Commr. Lynch on demand response goals and large customer tariffs and programs Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 29, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Altenrate Draft Interim Opinion of Commr. Lynch in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 29, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION Description: of Cmmr. Lynch in an interim opinion in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 29, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS ON ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 29, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: of Cmmr. Lynch in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: RULING Filing Date: May 27, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: Resolves implementation dispute regarding shadow bills (corrected). Type: RULING Filing Date: May 23, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: resolving implementation dispute regarding shadow bills; as set forth. Type: ALTERNATE Filing Date: May 21, 2003 Filed By: COM/LYNCH/PUC Description: Comments are due by 5/30, and there will be no opportunity for reply comments. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 6, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: reply; on the proposed decision of ALJ Carew addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Reply; on Draft Interim Opinion in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: REQUEST Filing Date: May 5, 2003 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER COOPERATIVE Description: for compensation. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: reply; on draft decision addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: reply; on draft decision addressing demand response goals, etc. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: reply; on the draft decision in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals, etc. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: May 5, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Reply; on Draft Interim Opinion in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: MOTION Filing Date: April 29, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: for acceptance of late-filed comments; comments attached. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Opening; on the Draft Decision addressing Demand Response Programs for large customers. Type: PETITION Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: ECHELON CORPORATION Description: to Intervene; COMMENTS ATTACHED. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES Description: on Proposed Decision of ALJ Carew. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: CELERITY ENERGY DBS INDUSTRIES DEMAND RESERVE PROVIDERS: ANCILLARY SERVICES COALITION, ONSITE ENERGY CORP. ROBERTSON-BRYAN, INC. Description: joint; to the draft decision of ALJ Carew addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION Description: on the draft decision re demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on the draft decision re demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA Description: on the draft decision in Phase 1 re demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: on the draft decision of ALJ Carew in Phase 1 re demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on draft decision re demand response goals, etc. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: on draft decision in Phase 1 re demand response goals, etc. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES Description: on draft decision in Phase 1 re demand response goals, etc. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 28, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on Draft Interim Opinion in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: April 25, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHONOLOGY ASSOCIATION Description: On the Draft Decision For an Interim Opinion in Phase I Addressing Demand Response Goals and Adopting Tariffs and Programs For Large Customers Type: NOTICE Filing Date: April 21, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: of Grant of Request for Ex Parte Meeting. Type: COMPLIANCE FILING Filing Date: April 14, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Joint; pursuant to OP1 of D03-03-036. Type: DRAFT DECISION Filing Date: April 8, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: [interim; in Phase 1 addressing demand response goals and adopting tariffs and programs for large customers]; opening comments are due by April 28, 2003; reply comments - 5 days after opening comments are filed. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: March 28, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: On March 25, 2003, Jason Reiger, attorney of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Aaron Johnson, advisor to Cmmr. Lynch, in San Francisco. Also present was Steve Ross, staff analyst, for ORA. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. ORA representatives stated its view of the benefit of having clear and conspicuous language regarding the ratepayers right to opt-out of the critical peak pricing program included in any correspondence to the programs participants. ORA representatives stated its belief that participant recruitment and retention will be enhanced if ratepayers fully understand they have the option to withdraw from the pilot. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: March 21, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: On March 18, 2003, Jason Reiger, staff attorney, Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with David Gamson, advisor to Cmmr. Brown, in San Francisco. Also present were Steve Ross and Sean Casey, staff analyst, for ORA. ORA representatives stated its views on the benefit of having the potential rate changes in the Dynamic Price Rulemaking (R02-06-001) be coordinated with the PROACT proceeding. ORA representatives explained that the rage changes in R02-06-001 are expected to increase rates, while the PROACT adjustments are anticipated to decrease rates. Type: REPORT Filing Date: March 12, 2003 Filed By: WORKING GROUP 2 Description: Fourth; on dynamic tariff and program proposals: Transitional Incentives. Type: SUPPLEMENTAL Filing Date: March 10, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: response to February 21, 2003 ALJ's ruling. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 7, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Supplemental; responding to data request in February 21, 2003 Ruling Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: March 7, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to February 21, 2003 ALJ's Ruling Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: March 7, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: to ALJ Ruling regarding Working Group 2 and Working Group 3 issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 7, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: in response to the ALJ's Ruling of February 21, 2003 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 5, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Reply; on Draft Interim Opinion in Phase 1 Adopting Pilot Program for Residential and Small Commercial Customers Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 5, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: reply; on draft opinion adopting pilot program for residential and small commercial customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 5, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: reply; on draft decision of ALJ Carew. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: March 4, 2003 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER COOPERATIVE Description: on interim opinion in Phase I adopting pilot program for residential and small commercial customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: February 28, 2003 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: on the Draft Phase I Interim Decision of ALJ Carew adopting pilot programs for residential and small commercial customers. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: February 28, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Draft Interim Opinion in Phase 1 adopting Pilot Program for residential and small commercial customers Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: February 28, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on the Phase 1 Draft Decision of ALJ Carew Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: February 28, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: on the Draft Decision of ALJ Carew's Interim Opinion in Phase 1 adopting Pilot Program for residential and small commercial customers Type: RULING Filing Date: February 21, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: Shortens the comment period on the draft decision. Opening comments are now due 2/28; reply comments due 3/5. Supplemental comments to attachment of this ruling shall be filed and served by March 7. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: February 19, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON February 11, 2003 AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF February 20, 2003. On February 10, 2003, Jason Reiger, attorney of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was ALJ Carew, and Steve Ross, staff analyst, and Scott Cauchois, Senior Manager, for ORA. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. ORA representatives stated its view of the benefits of various cost recovery methods and their impact on enrollment in dynamic pricing tariffs. ORA representatives also discussed how rate design issues would be affected by cost recovery decisions and the connections between this proceeding and other ratemaking proceedings. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: February 11, 2003 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On February 10, 2003, Jason Reiger, attorney of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Pres. Peevey. Also present was ALJ Carew, and Steve Ross, staff analyst, and Scott Cauchois, Senior Manager, for ORA. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. ORA representatives stated its view of the benefits of various cost recovery methods and their impact on enrollment in dynamic pricing tariffs. ORA representatives also discussed how rate design issues would be affected by cost recovery decisions and the connections between this proceeding and other ratemaking proceedings. Type: DRAFT DECISION Filing Date: February 11, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: comments are due by March 3, 2003; reply - 5 days after comments are filed. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: February 10, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: On February 5, 2003, Marcel Hawiger, attorney for The Utility Reform Network (TURN), met with Pres. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch and Kevin Coughlan, advisors to Pres. Peevey, Sara Steck Myers, attorney for TURN, and Jeffrey Nahigian, a consultant with JBC Energy, Inc. Written material (attached to the notice) `Advanced Metering OIR: Summary of TURN's position' was used. The written material addresses TURN's three principal concerns with respect to time-differentiated rates or advanced meters for small customers. Myers summarized these three points. Hawiger and Nahigian addressed specific examples of the need for developing record evidence of cost-effectiveness of advanced meters and dynamic tariffs for small customers before any system-wide deployment is authorized. In particular, Nahigian addressed both the results and applicability to California of the residential appliance saturation study of Pacific Gas and Electric Company and the time-of-use pilot initiated by Puget Sound Energy. Myers stated that the Commission should ensure that small customers were not asked to incur costs or participate in programs that were not mandated for large customers. Nahigian and Hawiger emphasized the existence of current demand reduction tools. Nahigian indicated that such programs have been demonstrated to provide cost-effective demand reduction. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on Workshop Reports of Working Group 2 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on the Working Group 2 Reports Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on November 15, 2002, December 13, 2002 and January 16, 2003 Reports of Working Group 2 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOC. OF CALIFORNIA Description: On the Working Group 2 Reports on Dynamic Tariff and Program Proposals Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES Description: On the Third Report of Working Group Two Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: IMSERV Description: On the January 16, 2003 Report of Working Group 2 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSOC. Description: on dynamic tariff and program proposals, implementation and addendum modifying previous proposals Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM Description: on the Third Report of Working Group 2 on dynamic tariff and program proposals: addendum modifying previous reports Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 27, 2003 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Working Group 2 Reports Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: January 23, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: to San Francisco Community Power Cooperative's supplemental comments to January 10, 2003 ALJ's ruling. Type: REPORT Filing Date: January 22, 2003 Filed By: WORKING GROUP 2 Description: Third; on Dynamic Tariff and Program Proposals: Addendum modifying previous reports. Type: MOTION Filing Date: January 21, 2003 Filed By: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Description: to Intervene; ATTACHED: Comments on the Joint Utilities Critical Peak Pricing Proposal presented to Working Group 2. Type: SUPPLEMENT Filing Date: January 21, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMANY Description: to Joint Response of PG&E, Southern California Edison Company, and SDG&E to January 10, 2003 Ruling of ALJ. Type: SUPPLEMENTAL Filing Date: January 21, 2003 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER COOPERATIVE Description: response to ALJ's ruling regarding the working group 3 report and certain other procedural issues. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: January 17, 2003 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: on the Ruling of the ALJ regarding the Working Group 3 Report and certain other procedural issues. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: January 17, 2003 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Joint; to January 10, 2003 Ruling of ALJ. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: January 17, 2003 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: to the January 10, 2003 ALJ Ruling. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: January 16, 2003 Filed By: IMSERV NA Description: to the ALJ's January 10, 2003 Ruling regarding the Working Group 3 report. Type: RULING Filing Date: January 10, 2003 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: Regarding the Working Group 3 Report and Certain Other Procedural Issues: supplemental written comments due on 1/17/03; grants NRDC's and ACWA's motions for leave to intervene; Third Working Group 2 Report due on 1/16/03; written comments on all three Working Group 2 Reports are due on 1/27/03. Type: MOTION Filing Date: December 31, 2002 Filed By: ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES Description: to intervene; comments on Working Group 2 Reports Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Working Group 3 Report. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Addendum to Working Group 2 Report Submitting Critical Peak Pricing Proposal Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on December 10, 2002 Report of Working Group 3 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: on the Report of Working Group 3 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: on Report of Working Group 3 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: on Report of Working Group 3 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: INVENSYS - I MSERV NA Description: on the December 10, 2002 Report of Working Group 3 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION Description: on the Working Group Reports Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 30, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on Workshop Report of Working Group 3 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: December 26, 2002 Filed By: CONSUMERS UNION Description: on Working Group Reports Type: REPORT Filing Date: December 16, 2002 Filed By: WORKING GROUP 2 Description: of Working Group 2 on Dynamic Tariff and Program Proposals: Implementation Issues. Type: REPORT Filing Date: December 10, 2002 Filed By: WORKING GROUP 3 Description: Proposed pilot projects and market research to assess the potential for deployment of dynamic tariffs for residential and small commercial customers. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: December 9, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: of grant of ex parte meeting Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 26, 2002 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Comments on the Assigned Cmmr's and ALJ's 11/13/2002 Ruling following the third meeting of Working Group 1 Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: November 26, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Response to 11/13/2002 Assigned Cmmr.'s and ALJ's Ruling Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 26, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Comments on Assigned Cmmr.'s and ALJ's Ruling following the third meeting of Working Group 1 Type: REPORT Filing Date: November 18, 2002 Filed By: WORKING GROUP 2 Description: of working group 2 on dynamic tariff and program proposals. Type: RULING Filing Date: November 13, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: following the third meeting of Working Group 1 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Description: Comments on ALJ Ruling seeking comments on Vision Statement Type: MOTION Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Description: Motion for Leave to Intervene as an Interested Party Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: Comments pursuant to ALJ Ruling dated 10/29/02 regarding Vision Statement Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE SILICON VALLEY MANUFACTURERS GROUP Description: Joint Comments on ALJ Ruling seeking comments on Vision Statement Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Comments on 10/29/02 ALJ Ruling Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION Description: On Updated Interagency Vision Document Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL USERS Description: On ALJ's Ruling seeking comment on Vision Statement Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: On ALJ's Ruling Following the Third Meeting of Working Group 1 and Seeking Comments on the Proposed Vision Statement Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On the Vision Statement Following the Third Meeting of Working Group 1 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: November 8, 2002 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: on ALJ's ruling of October 29, 2002 seeking comment on vision statement Type: RULING Filing Date: October 29, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: Comments addressing the latest version of the document "California Demand Response: A Vision for the Future (2002-2007)" is due 11/8. Type: RULING Filing Date: October 29, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: Grants the motion of RealEnergy, Inc. to intervene to a limited degree as set forth. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on October 2, 2002 Ruling following second meeting of Working Group 1. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION Description: On the ALJ's Ruling Following the Second Meeting of Working Group 1 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: ORA/BLUNT/PUC Description: On ALJ's Ruling Folowing the Second Meeting of Working Group 1 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: On ALJ's Ruling Following the Second Meeting of Working Group 1 ("ALJ Ruling") Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On October 2, 2002 ALJ Ruling Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: INVENSYS-IMSERV NA Description: On the ALJ's October 2, 2002 Ruling Following the Second Meeting of Working Group 1 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: In Response to the ALJ's October Ruling Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM Description: on the October 2, 2002 Ruling of ALJ Carew. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: October 10, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on ALJ's Ruling following the second meeting of Working Group 1. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: October 7, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On October 2, 2002, William Stock, Chief, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Peevey in San Francisco. Also present were Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, and Karen Tomcala, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, Beverly Alexander, Vice President, Rates and Account Services, and Anlin Ting-Mason, Vice President, Internet and Energy Programs, for PG&E. Tomcala stated that PG&E continues to be committed to exploring how dynamic pricing and automated metering can make the best use of scarce electric resources. Alexander noted that customers are not likely to support the metering effort unless there is evidence that sufficient customer demand response can be achieved, thereby saving on-peak energy procurement costs. Tomcala indicated that peak MW value is a very important program design parameter and that publicly available numbers vary considerably. Tomcala and Stock stated that while the Legislature's intent is to explore the potential for dynamic pricing, they have also indicated that customer response should be tested. Type: RULING Filing Date: October 2, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: following the second meeting of Working Group 1: Parties may file/serve comments by 10/10/2002 Type: REPLY Filing Date: September 27, 2002 Filed By: REALENERGY, INC. Description: to [Edison's] Response to Motion to Intervene as an Interested Party. Type: SUPPLEMENT Filing Date: September 23, 2002 Filed By: CONSUMERS UNION Description: to Notice of Intent to Claim Compensation. Type: RESPONSE Filing Date: September 20, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: to Motion of Realenergy, Inc. to Intervene as an Interested Party. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: September 16, 2002 Filed By: TRUEPRICING, INC. Description: on ALJ Ruling following the first meeting of Working Group 1. Type: RULING Filing Date: September 16, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: addressing notices of intent to claim compensation. Type: MOTION Filing Date: September 16, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURERS & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION Description: for leave to file comments out of time; comments attached. Type: MOTION Filing Date: September 13, 2002 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: for acceptance of late-filed Comments; Comments attached. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: September 12, 2002 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on September 5, 2002 Ruling following first meeting of Working Group 1. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: September 12, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: on ALJ's Ruling following the first meeting of working group 1. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: September 12, 2002 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: on ALJ's Ruling following the first meeting of working group 1. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: September 12, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Comments on 9/5/2002 ALJ Ruling Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: September 12, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on ALJ's Ruling following the first meeting of Working group 1. Type: MOTION Filing Date: September 6, 2002 Filed By: REALENERGY, INC. Description: to Intervene as an Interested Party. Type: RULING Filing Date: September 5, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: following the first meeting of Working Group 1; Parties may file/serve comments by 9/12/2002 Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 29, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On August 27, 2002, Chris King, Chief Strategy Officer of eMeter, representing the California Consumer Empowerment Alliance, met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present were Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood. Written materials (attached to the notice) were used. Type: SCOPING RULING Filing Date: August 16, 2002 Filed By: CMMR/PEEVEY/PUC Description: Confirms that this is a ratesetting proceeding and hearing may be necessary. Sets scope of Phase 1 and schedule: Working Group Meetings/Experimential Workshops - 8/26 to 10/14; Working Group 2 Report - 10/28;Working Group 3 Report - 10/31; Comments on WG 2 Report - 11/4; Comments on WG 3 Report, Submission Date - 11/8; Draft Decision - 12/9; Commission Decision - 1/2003. Designates ALJ Carew as principal hearing officer. Ex parte communications rules apply. Adopts official service list. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: August 15, 2002 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: Notice of Intent to claim compensation Type: NOTICE Filing Date: August 15, 2002 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER COOPERATIVE Description: of Intent to Claim Compensation. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: August 13, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER POWER AND CONSERVATION FINANCING AUTHORITY Description: Description of existing and planned demand-response activities. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: on Proposed Procedural Framework. Type: REPORT Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on Existing and Planned Demand Response and Pricing Options. Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Description of existing demand response programs and pricing options (per OIR and ALJ Ruling) Type: MISCELLANEOUS FILING Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Existing Demand Response Programs and Pricing Options. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY EMPLOYEES Description: Comments on the proposed procedural framework Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: Comments on proposed procedural framework Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: Comments in response to 8/1/2002 ALJ Carew's Ruling Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: INVENSYS HOME CONTROL SYSTEMS Description: Comments on proposed procedural framework Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: IMSERV NA Description: Comments on the proposed procedural framework Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Comments on proposed procedural framework for Phase 1 Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: GRID SERVICES, INC. Description: on existing demand responsive programs. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Description: concerning demand response pilots Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 9, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: on Ruling following PHC. Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 8, 2002 Filed By: CONSUMERS UNION Description: Comments on proposed procedural framework Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: August 7, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: Comments on Ruling following prehearing conference Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: August 5, 2002 Filed By: CANNON TECHNOLOGIES HONEYWELL, INTERNATIONAL Description: Prehearing conference statement (filing authorized by ALJ Carew) Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: August 1, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: THIS IS AN AUGMENTED NOTICE OF AN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION THAT WAS FILED ON July 22, 2002 AND APPEARED IN THE CALENDAR OF August 2, 2002. On July 19, 2002, Chris King of eMeter Corporation, member of the California Consumer Empowerment Alliance (CCEA) met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Jeff Francetic of Siemens Metering, Incorporated, member of CCEA. Written material (attached to the notice) was used. King and Francetic expressed support for the working group structure discussed in the prehearing conference. Type: RULING Filing Date: August 1, 2002 Filed By: ALJ/CAREW/PUC Description: following prehearing conference: parties shall file/serve comments by 8/8/2002; Respondents PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E shall file report by 8/9/2002; all other due dates listed in initial schedule in OIR are suspended until further notice Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 30, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 25, 2002, John Clarke, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Cmmr. Wood in San Francisco. Also present was Steven Weissman, advisor to Cmmr. Wood, and Karen A. Tomcala, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, PG&E. Tomcala and Clarke discussed the recently opened Rulemaking and asked about the role other California energy agencies are expected to play in the Rulemaking. Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 30, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: On July 25, 2002, John Clarke, Manager, Regulatory Relations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Karen A. Tomcala, Vice President, Regulatory Relations, PG&E. Clarke stated that PG&E viewed the Commission's new procedural organization for this proceeding as a sensible approach and expressed PG&E's desire that the schedule for final implementation remain intact. Tomcala stated that PG&E believes that the Rulemaking is an important step in fixing California's energy markets. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: July 23, 2002 Filed By: CONSUMERS UNION Description: Notice of Intent to claim compensation Type: EXPARTE Filing Date: July 22, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: AUGMENTATION REQUIRED. On July 19, 2002, Chris King of eMeter Corporation met with Julie Fitch, advisor to Cmmr. Peevey, in San Francisco. Also present was Jeff Francetic of Siemens Metering, Incorporated. Type: NOTICE Filing Date: July 22, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Of Grant of Request For Ex Parte Meeting Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: July 15, 2002 Filed By: GOODCENTS SOLUTIONS, INC. Description: Comments on the Commission's Order Instituting Rulemaking (filing authorized by ALJ Carew) Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: July 15, 2002 Filed By: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY POWER COOPERATIVE Description: Prehearing Conference Statement. Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: July 1, 2002 Filed By: POWERWEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Description: Prehearing Conference Statement (filing authorized by ALJ Carew) Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2002 Filed By: COMVERGE TECHNOLOGIES INC. Description: Comments on the Commission's Order Instituting Rulemaking Type: COMMENTS Filing Date: June 28, 2002 Filed By: CALIFORNIA CONSUMER EMPOWERMENT ALLIANCE Description: Opening Comments Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: June 28, 2002 Filed By: ORA/REIGER/PUC Description: In the CPUC OIR on policies and practices for advanced metering demand response, and dynamic pricing Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: June 28, 2002 Filed By: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Pursuant to the OIR Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: June 28, 2002 Filed By: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK Description: Pursuant to the schedule established in the OIR Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: June 28, 2002 Filed By: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY Description: Prehearing Conference Statement Type: PREHEARING CONFERENCE STATEMENT Filing Date: June 28, 2002 Filed By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Description: Prehearing Conference Statement Type: COMMISSION RULEMAKING Filing Date: June 6, 2002 Filed By: CPUC - PG&E, EDISON, SDG&E Description: Order Instituting Rulemaking on policies and practices for advanced metering, demand response, and dynamic pricing.

Top of Page      Back to Top of Page
2000 State of California. Gray Davis, Governor. Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy | E-mail Webmaster