| Word Document PDF Document |
COM/HMD/jva DRAFT Item 1a
4/18/02
Agenda ID 360
Decision ALTERNATE DRAFT DECISION OF COMMISSIONER DUQUE
(Mailed 3/12/02)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Order Instituting Investigation on the Commission's Own Motion Into the Operations and Practices of Bidwell Water Company and Its Owners and Operators, Thomas and Vicki Jernigan, and Order to Show Cause Why Findings Should Not Be Entered by the Commission Under Public Utilities Code Section 855. |
Investigation 01-10-002 (Filed October 2, 2001) |
Stephanie Martinez, Attorney at Law, and
Thomas Joseph Jernigan, for Bidwell Water
Company and its Owners and Operators,
Thomas and Vicki Jernigan, respondents.
Carol A. Dumond, Attorney at Law, and
Mark Bumgardner, for the Commission's
Consumer Services Division.
OPINION ON ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE CONCERNING FINDINGS UNDER
PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE SECTION 855
Table of Contents
Page
OPINION ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CONCERNING FINDINGS
UNDER PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE SECTION 855 22
2. Background and Procedural History 22
5. Comments on Alternate Draft Decision 1717
OPINION ON ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE CONCERNING FINDINGS UNDER
PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE SECTION 855
The Commission finds that a showing has not been made sufficient to support a determination that Bidwell Water Company (Bidwell) is unable or unwilling to adequately serve its ratepayers, or has been actually or effectively abandoned by its owners, or is unresponsive to the orders or rules of the Commission. However, the Commission finds that Bidwell has not fully complied with orders issued in a prior investigation. Today's decision requires Bidwell to develop a compliance plan for correcting these irregularities.