Word Document PDF Document

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

505 VAN NESS AVENUE

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298

December 18, 2008 Agenda ID #8194

TO SERVICE LIST IN RULEMAKING (R.) 05-07-015:

This Draft Resolution ALJ-224 proposes amendments to the Rules of Practice and Procedure (Title 20, Division 1, of the California Code of Regulations). Pursuant to Government Code §§ 11346.4 and 11351, and California Code of Regulations, Title 1,
§§ 1-120, notice of these proposed amendments will be published in the California Regulatory Notice Register.  This publication starts the 45-day notice and comment period, which closes at 5:00 p.m. on the 45th day after publication.  The date of this publication will be noticed on the Daily Calendar as soon as practicable after publication. This 45-day notice and comment period satisfies the notice and comment requirements of Pub. Util. Code § 311.

Any person may submit written comments concerning the proposed rule amendments by serving them on:

Hallie Yacknin

Administrative Law Judge

California Public Utilities Commission

505 Van Ness Avenue, Room 5005

San Francisco, CA  94102

e-mail:  hsy@cpuc.ca.gov

Following the comment period, the Commission may adopt the proposed rule amendments substantially as set forth in this Draft Resolution. If modifications are made that are sufficiently related to the originally proposed text, the modified text, with the changes clearly indicated, will be made available to the public for additional notice and comment at least 15 days prior to the date on which the Commission adopts the rule amendments.

/s/ ANGELA K. MINKIN

Angela K. Minkin, Chief

Administrative Law Judge

ANG:jyc

cc: Service list in R.05-07-015

Attachment

ALJ/HSY/jyc DRAFT Agenda ID #8194

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

R E S O L U T I O N

RESOLUTION ALJ-224 to amend the Rules of Practice and Procedure
(Title 20, Division 1, of the California Code of Regulations).

Summary

This resolution approves amendments to the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (Title 20, Division 1, of the California Code of Regulations). The amendments update the Rules to reflect changes in the Commission's administration, provide consistency between the rules, and provide greater clarity. In addition, we codify rules for electronic filing of documents. Lastly, we amend Rule 14.6(c) regarding reduction or waiver of review of proposed decisions to correct an inadvertent error. All of the amendments are addressed separately below. The specific changes are shown in strikethrough and underline format in Appendix A to this resolution.

Pursuant to Pub. Util. Code § 311(h), these amendments shall be submitted to the Office of Administrative Law for review and publication in the California Code of Regulations, and for transmittal to the Secretary of State.

Rule 1.4(a)(3)

Rule 1.4(a)(2)(ii) provides that a person may become a party to a proceeding by filing "comments in a rulemaking." We amend the rule to clarify that the comments in question are in response to a rulemaking, in order to distinguish them from comments on a proposed or alternate decision (see Rule 14.3).

Rule 1.4(a)(3) provides that a person may become a party to a proceeding by "entering an appearance at a prehearing conference or hearing." This language is ambiguous and misleading. It is not enough to merely attend a prehearing conference or hearing in order to achieve party status; a person must make a motion. We amend Rule 1.4(a)(3) to clarify that a person may seek party status at a prehearing conference or hearing by making an oral motion.

Rule 1.4(b)(2)

Rule 1.4(b)(2) provides that a person seeking party status by protest or response to an application or a petition or comments in a rulemaking, or by motion, shall "show that the contentions [that the person would make] will be reasonably pertinent to the issues already presented." This language of Rule 1.4(b)(2) is ambiguous. Although it requires the person to show that "the contentions" are pertinent to the proceeding, it omits to require the person to identify those contentions or to define "contentions" for the purposes of this requirement. We modify Rule 1.4(b)(2) to include the requirement that the person identify the legal and factual contentions that the person intends to present.

With this clarification, Rule 1.4(b)(2) is redundant with respect to filed protests, responses, and comments. Rule 2.6 requires protests and responses to state the factual grounds for the protest or response. (As discussed below, we modify Rule 2.6 to add "legal grounds" to this requirement.) Comments to a rulemaking, by definition, present legal and factual contentions in response to the rulemaking. We therefore modify
Rule 1.4(b)(2) to limit its applicability to motions to become a party.

Rule 1.7(a)

Rule 1.7(a) directs that motions to accept a late filing attach the document that is the subject of the motion. This practice is no longer feasible under the Commission's electronic filing and docketing processes. We amend the rule to require persons filing motions that seek leave to file another document to concurrently and separately tender to Docket Office the document that is the subject of the motion. Docket Office will file the document upon the issuance of a ruling or order authorizing its filing.

We also change the example used in the rule from "Motion for Protective Order" to "Motion to File Under Seal" consistent with prior changes to the rules that distinguish among types of protective orders and discourage the use of the indistinct term "protective order."

Rules 1.9(a-b) and 1.10(d)

Rules 1.9(a) and 1.10(d) require service of documents on the assigned Administrative Law Judge. However, sometimes documents are filed and served in advance of an Administrative Law Judge being assigned to a proceeding. We amend Rules 1.9(a) and 1.10(d) to provide for service on the Chief Administrative Law Judge if an Administrative Law Judge is not yet assigned to the proceeding, and make other clarifying amendments to Rules 1.9(a) and (b).

Rule 1.9(e)

Rule 1.9(e) provides for the Commission's Process Office to maintain the official service list for all pending proceedings. We amend Rule 1.9(e) to identify the categories of service and the process for requesting addition to the official service list, consistent with current Commission practice.

Rule 1.9(f)

Rule 1.9(f) provides that the Administrative Law Judge may revise the official service list to make corrections and to delete inactive parties. This rule is largely redundant with Rule 1.4(c); to the extent it is not redundant, it is inconsistent with the administration of the official service list as clarified in amended Rule 1.9(e). Therefore, we delete it.

Rules 1.10(a) and (b)

Rule 1.10 provides for service by electronic mail (e-mail). Consistent with current Commission practice, we amend Rules 1.10(a) and (b) to clarify that e-mail service is only available to persons who have provided an e-mail address for the official service list, that use of e-mail service excuses persons from serving persons in the "Information Only" category of the official service list who have not provided e-mail addresses, and that use of e-mail service does not excuse persons from otherwise serving persons in the "Parties" and "State Service" categories of the official service list who have not provided e-mail addresses.

Rule 1.10(c)

Rule 1.10(c) excuses persons from re-serving, after failure of e-mail service, documents on persons listed on the official service list "for receipt of Commission documents only." As reflected in amended Rule 1.9(e), such persons are listed in the "Information Only" category of the official service list. We amend Rule 1.10(c) to substitute this terminology for consistency between the rules.

Rule 1.12

Rule 1.12 provides that an amendment to an application, protest, complaint or answer must be filed and served at least five days before the scheduled date of hearing. However, pursuant to Rule 7.3, in most proceedings the assigned Commissioner will issue a scoping memo, based on the pleadings and prehearing conference to date, determining the issues to be addressed and the schedule of the proceeding. It is therefore prudent and practical to require amendments to be filed in advance of the issuance of the scoping memo (subject, as are all of the rules, to Rule 1.2 allowing deviations in special circumstances and for good cause shown). We amend Rule 1.12 to so require.

Rule 1.13

Rule 1.13 provides for the tendering and filing of documents. Resolution ALJ-188 adopted interim rules for the Commission's Electronic Filing Pilot Period. The pilot has proven successful in reducing administrative burden and the use of natural resources, and in providing timely notice of filed documents on the Commission's website. We therefore amend Rule 1.13 to incorporate the procedures set forth in Resolution
ALJ-188, and to require utilities whose gross intrastate revenues, as reported in their most recent annual reports to the Commission, exceed $10 million to use the electronic filing system to file all documents not otherwise prohibited or excused by the rules.

We split the rule into two separate rules: Rule 1.13 now addresses the tendering of documents, and new Rule 1.14 addresses the review and filing of such documents. Accordingly, we renumber the subsequent rules in Article 2.

Rule 1.13 as currently written provides the option of tendering documents for filing at the Commission's office in San Diego. That office is now closed. We amend Rule 1.13 to delete its reference to the Commission's San Diego office.

Rule 1.15 (renumbered Rule 1.16)

Rule 1.15 provides for filing fees set forth in the Table of Filing Fees at the end of the Rules. Rule 1.15 states that filings marked with an asterisk should be submitted to the "Tariff and License Branch of the Rail Safety and Carriers Division." However, none of the filings in the table are so marked (and the referenced branch and division no longer exist as named within the Commission's current organizational structure). We delete this statement.

We also incorporate the provision from Resolution ALJ-188 requiring filing fees for documents tendered electronically to be paid by credit card.

[New] Rule 1.18 and Rule 2.7

Rule 2.7, concerning applications generally, requires that applicants, protestants, and parties tendering responses to applications to furnish a copy of such document to each person upon request. We find it appropriate to extend this rule to all documents filed with the Commission. We therefore adopt a new rule to this effect, and delete Rule 2.7 as redundant with the new rule.

Rule 2.6(b)

Rule 2.6(b) provides that a protest must state the facts constituting the grounds for the protest. However, the grounds for a protest may be legal rather than, or in addition to, factual. We amend Rule 2.6(b) to include the requirement that the protest state the legal grounds, if applicable.

Rule 3.2(c)

Rule 3.2(c) requires applicants for authority to increase rates to publish notice of such application in newspapers, and to "file proof of compliance." We amend Rule 3.2(c) to specify the form of proof of compliance. Specifically, we require the applicant to file sworn verification listing the newspapers and publication dates, and including a sample of each different notice. We also require the applicant to maintain documentation of compliance and to provide it upon request.

Rule 8.1(d)(1)

Rule 8.1(d) defines "interested persons," and subsection (1) of Rule 8.1(d) includes in that definition "any applicant, protestant, respondent, petitioner, complainant, defendant or interested person who has made a formal appearance" and "Commission staff of record." Pursuant to Rule 1.4, these persons are parties to the proceeding. For clarity and consistency with Rule 1.4, we amend Rule 8.1(d)(1) to substitute the term "party" for the phrase listing persons who are parties.

Rule 8.2(c)(2)

Rule 8.2(c)(2) requires any person who is granted an individual ex parte communication meeting with a decisionmaker to notify the parties that the meeting was granted at least three days in advance of the meeting, and to provide the decisionmaker with a certificate of service of that notice at or prior to the meeting. We amend the rule to require the person to file the notice, in order to create a formal record of compliance with the rule. The formal record of notification eliminates the need for the person to provide the decisionmaker with the certificate of service of notification, and so we delete this requirement.

Rule 8.2(d)

Rules 8.4(a) and (b) provide that the ex parte requirements applicable to the proceeding's preliminary categorization shall apply until the assigned Commissioner's scoping memo issues finalizing the determination of the category. However,
Rule 8.2(d) provides that the restrictions and reporting requirements applicable to
ex parte communications shall cease to apply if no timely responsive pleadings or request for hearing is filed, or all such pleadings are withdrawn. We amend Rule 8.2(d) to cross-reference Rule 8.4 in order to clarify that, notwithstanding Rule 8.4, the provisions of Rule 8.2(d) do indeed govern in the circumstances it identifies.

Rule 8.3(a) (renumbered Rule 8.3)

Rule 8.3(a) requires the filing of notices of ex parte communications. We amend the rule to clarify that a single filing may notice multiple ex parte communications in the same proceeding, provided that all of the notices are timely.

Rule 8.3(b)

Rule 8.3(b) provides for electronic service of notices of ex parte communications. However, Rule 1.9 independently requires service of all filed documents, including by electronic service pursuant to Rule 1.10. This requirement makes redundant provisions of Rule 8.3(b) provisions for electronically serving filed notices of ex parte communications. We therefore delete this rule.

Rule 8.3(c)

Rule 8.3(c) provides that notices of ex parte communications will be reported in the Commission's Daily Calendar. This rule was adopted prior to the adoption of current Rule 1.9 and Rule 8.3(b), when notices of ex parte communications were not required to be served. Now that notices of ex parte communication are served (and noticed on the docket card of the proceeding), having the Commission additionally report them in the Daily Calendar is unduly burdensome. We therefore delete this rule.

Rule 8.3(d)

Rule 8.3(d) provides that parties may obtain copies of notices of ex parte communications from the Commission's Central File room. This is generally true of all documents maintained in the Commission's Central File room, and there is no cause to uniquely identify this fact with respect to notices of ex parte communication.

Rule 8.3(d) also requires the person who filed the notice to provide a copy to a requesting person upon request. This rule was adopted prior to the adoption of current Rule 1.9 and Rule 8.3(b), when notices of ex parte communications were not required to be served. Now that notices of ex parte communication are served, to the extent that the requestor is on the official service list, requiring persons to provide copies upon request is redundant. Furthermore, as discussed previously, we adopt new Rule 1.17 to provide that all persons who file documents with the Commission must provide a copy of the document to any person upon request.

Rule 11.5(a)

Rule 11.5(a) provides that motions to seal the evidentiary record may be made at hearing. This makes practical sense with respect to unforeseen or unforeseeable evidence such as oral testimony. However, with respect to prepared testimony that is served in advance of hearing pursuant to Rule 13.8, requiring such motions in advance of hearing will better serve the interests of administrative efficiency. We therefore amend Rule 11.5(a) to require motions to seal the evidentiary record with respect to prepared testimony to be made no later than 10 days in advance of hearing.

Rule 11.6

Rule 11.6 provides for motions for extensions of time limits. Although the rule provides for the moving party to notify other parties of the Administrative Law Judge's grant of the extension, it does not provide for notifying the Docket Office of why it should accept the document as timely for filing. In order to inform the formal record and the Docket Office of the authority to file documents beyond previously established time limits, we amend Rule 11.6 to require the opening paragraph of the document to indicate that the Administrative Law Judge has granted the extension.

Rule 13.9

Rule 13.9 provides that the Commission may take official notice of matters that may be judicially noticed by the courts of the State of California. For clarity, we amend
Rule 13.9 to refer to Evidence Code Section 450 et seq., the statute governing what matters may be judicially noticed by the courts.

Rules 14.2(a) and (b)

Rules 14.2(a) and (b) provide that proposed decisions and presiding officers' decisions shall be filed with the Commission and served on "all parties." In fact, service is made on the entire official service list, which includes non-parties. We amend Rules 14.2(a) and (b) to make that clarifying correction.

Rule 14.3(c)

Rule 14.3(c) requires comments on proposed or alternative decisions to focus on factual, legal or technical errors and to make specific reference to the record. We amend the rule to clarify that assertions of legal error require specific reference to the law.

Rule 14.3(c) goes on to state that comments which merely reargue positions taken in briefs will be accorded no weight. This statement is not necessarily correct: comments which identify error with specific reference to the record or the law are fairly accorded weight, even if they reargue positions taken in briefs. More precisely, comments which will be accorded no weight are those that fail to focus on factual, legal or technical errors or that, in asserting such errors, fail to make specific reference to the record or the law. We amend the rule to make this clarification.

Rule 14.6(c)

Rule 14.6(c) provides for the reduction or waiver of public review and comment on draft resolutions, proposed decisions and alternates in the absence of an unforeseen emergency situation or stipulation by the parties. The previous version of subsection (c) (former Rule 77.7(f)) limited its application to "draft decisions" and alternates; we amended the rule to eliminate this definitional term in favor of simply stating the circumstances under which the public review and comment period may be reduced pursuant to Pub. Util. Code § 311(g)(3). (See R.06-02-011, pp. 26-27.) Upon further review and experience, we find that Rule 14.6(c) as currently written incorrectly implements Pub. Util. Code § 311(g)(3). Specifically, while Rule 14.6(c) applies to proposed decisions only in proceedings in which no hearings were conducted, neither former Rule 77.7(f) nor Pub. Util. Code § 311 so limits its applicability. To the contrary, limiting reduction or waiver of comment to proposed decisions in proceedings in which no hearings were conducted leads to absurd and sometimes impossible results. (For example, subsection (3) permits reduction or waiver of review of a decision on a request for review of a presiding officer's decision, but presiding officer's decisions by definition only issue in proceedings in which a hearing was conducted. (Rule 14.1(a).) We amend Rule 14.6(c) to eliminate this limitation.

Subsection (c)(3) identifies decisions extending the deadline for resolving adjudicatory proceedings as one circumstance in which the Commission may reduce or waive the period for public review and comment; subsection (c)(10) identifies decisions extending the deadline for resolving ratesetting or quasi-legislative proceedings. We combine these subsections to make it easier to locate the rules concerning this particular subject.

Rule 15.2(b)

Rule 15.2(b) directs members of the public to submit standing orders for receipt of copies of the agenda to the Commission's Management Service Division. The Administrative Law Judge Division has assumed responsibility for providing copies of the agenda to the public. We therefore amend Rule 15.2(b) to direct the public to submit such requests to the Administrative Law Judge Division.

Rule 17.3

Rule 17.3 provides for requests for an award of intervenor compensation to be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the decision to which the intervenor believes it made a substantial contribution or the decision closing the proceeding. Consistent with Commission practice as affirmed by Decision (D.) 07-05-057, we amend Rule 17.3 to clarify that a request may be filed after the issuance of any decision to which the intervenor believes it made a substantial contribution until 60 days after the issuance of the decision closing the proceeding.

Rule 17.4

Rule 17.3 provides for filing requests for an award of intervenor compensation.
Rule 17.4 provides for filing replies to responses to the requests. However, the rules are silent with regard to filing responses to the requests. We amend Rule 17.4 to include provisions for the filing of responses to requests for an award of intervenor compensation, pursuant to Pub. Util. Code § 1804(c).

Rule 17.4(g)

Pub. Util. Code § 1804(e) requires the Commission to issue a decision on a request for compensation, in most circumstances, within 75 days after filing of the request. Although not required by statute, Rule 17.4(g) provides the opportunity for filing replies to responses to requests for compensation within 15 days after service of the response, which may be 45 days (or more) after the request is filed. In order to afford the Commission a more reasonable opportunity to meet the statutory deadline for issuing its decision, we amend Rule 17.4(g) to shorten the time for filing replies to responses to requests for compensation to within 5 days after service of the response.

Passim

Rule 1.3(c) defines "person" to mean a natural person or organization, while Rule 1.4 provides how a person may become a "party" to a proceeding. These terms are not interchangeable: not all persons are parties and, while many rules apply only to parties, other rules apply to all persons including those who are not parties.

In numerous places throughout the rules, the term "party" is used in the vernacular sense of "person," rather than in the procedural sense of a formal participant in the proceeding. For example, many of the rules concerning restrictions and reporting requirements related to ex parte communications apply to non-party, interested persons as well as parties. Conversely, only parties have discovery rights (Article 10) and appeal rights (Article 16). For clarity and consistency, we amend the rules to replace the term "party" with the term "person" or "interested person" as appropriate. The affected rules are:

Rule 8.1(d)(1)

COMMENTS

Notice of these amendments, and comment on them, are governed by Government Code §§ 11346.4 and 11351, and California Code of Regulations, Title 1, §§ 1-120.

Notice of these amendments was published in the California Regulatory Notice Register on [DATE]. Comments were received from ___________.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The amendments to the Rules of Practice and Procedure (Title 20, Division 1, of the California Code of Regulations) update the Rules to reflect changes in the Commission's administration, provide consistency between the rules, and provide greater clarity. 

2. The amendment to Rule 14.6(c) corrects an inadvertent error in the previous amendment to the rule.

3. Amended Rules 1.13 and 1.14 reasonably implement the Commission's program for the electronic filing of documents.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The amendments to the Rules of Practice and Procedure, as shown in the attached Appendix A, are adopted.

2. The Chief Administrative Law Judge shall take all appropriate steps to submit the newly adopted rules to the Office of Administrative Law pursuant to Pub. Util. Code
§ 311(h) for purposes of approval and printing them in the California Code of Regulations, thereby giving them effect.

3. This resolution is effective today.

I certify that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted at a conference of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California held on _______________, the following Commissioners voting favorably thereon:

APPENDIX A

AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

1.4. (Rule 1.4) Participation in Proceedings

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code.

1.6. (Rule 1.6) Title Page Requirements

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code.

1.7. (Rule 1.7) Scope of Filing

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code.

1.8. (Rule 1.8) Signatures

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code.

1.9. (Rule 1.9) Service Generally

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 311.5, 1704, Public Utilities Code.

1.10. (Rule 1.10) Electronic Mail Service

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Section 311.5, Public Utilities Code; Section 11104.5, Government Code.

1.11. (Rule 1.11) Verification

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Section 446, Code of Civil Procedure.

1.12. (Rule 1.12) Amendments and Corrections

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.

1.13. (Rule 1.13) Tendering and Review of Document for Filing

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.

1.14. (Rule 1.14) Review and Filing of Tendered Documents

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.

1.145. (Rule 1.145) Computation of Time

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Section 12, Code of Civil Procedure.

1.156. (Rule 1.156) Filing Fees

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 1001, 1007, 1008, 1036, 1904, 2754, 2756, 3902, 4006, 5136, 5371.1, 5373.1 and 5377.1, Public Utilities Code.

1.167. (Rule 1.167) Daily Calendar

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.

1.18. (Rule 1.18) Copy of Document on Request

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code.

2.3. (Rule 2.3) Financial Statement

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code.

2.6. (Rule 2.6) Protests, Responses, and Replies

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.

2.7. (Rule 2.7) Copy of Document on Request

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.

3.2. (Rule 3.2) Authority to Increase Rates

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Section 454, Public Utilities Code.

3.6. (Rule 3.6) Transfers and Acquisitions

Note: Authority cited: Article 12, Section 2, California Constitution; and Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Sections 1007, 1010, and 1032.

8.1. (Rule 8.1) Definitions

8.2. (Rule 8.2) Ex Parte Requirements

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Sections 1701.1(a), 1701.2(b), 1701.3(c) and 1701.4(b), Public Utilities Code.

8.3. (Rule 8.3) Reporting Ex Parte Communications

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Section 1701.1(c)(4)(C)(i)-(iii), Public Utilities Code.

11.5. (Rule 11.5) Motion to Seal the Evidentiary Record

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code.

11.6. (Rule 11.6) Motion for Extension of Time

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Section 1701 Public Utilities Code.

13.9. (Rule 13.9) Official Notice of Facts

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code.

14.2. (Rule 14.2) Issuance of Recommended Decision

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 311(d), 311(f), 1701.1, 1701.3, 1701.4, Public Utilities Code.

14.3. (Rule 14.3) Comments on Proposed or Alternate Decision

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Section 311(d), Public Utilities Code.

14.6. (Rule 14.6) Reduction or Waiver of Review

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 306(b), 311(e), 311(g), 1701.2(d), 1701.5, Public Utilities Code; Section 11125.5, Government Code.

15.2. (Rule 15.2) Meeting Agenda

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 306(b and 311.5, Public Utilities Code; Sections 11125(b), 11125.3, and 11126.3(d), Government Code.

17.3. (Rule 17.3) Request for Award

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Section 1804, Public Utilities Code.

17.4. (Rule 17.4)  Request for Compensation; Reply to Responses

Note: Authority cited: Sections 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Section 1804, Public Utilities Code.

18.1. (Rule 18.1) Forms

The following skeleton forms of applications, complaint, answer, protest, and certificate of service are merely illustrative.  The content of a particular document will vary, depending on the subject matter and applicable rules.

Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code, and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 454, 1702, Public Utilities Code.

No. 4-Certificate of Service

(See Rule 1.9)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served a copy of [title of document, e.g., "Applicant UtilCorp's Motion to Strike" or "Notice of Availability of Application"] on all known parties to [proceeding number, e.g., A.93-01-010] by [here describe manner of service, e.g., mailing a properly addressed copy by first-class mail with postage prepaid, or transmitting an e-mail message with the document attached, etc.] to each party person named in the official service list [or appropriate special service list or specific parties persons required to be served by ruling or order, etc.]. (If more than one means of service is used, identify which parties persons were served by which means.)

Executed on [date] at [location], California.

   

[signature]

   

John Jones

(END OF APPENDIX A)

INFORMATION REGARDING SERVICE

I have provided notification of filing to the electronic mail addresses on the attached service list.

Upon confirmation of this document's acceptance for filing, I will cause a Notice of Availability of the filed document to be served upon the service list to this proceeding by U.S. mail. The service list I will use to serve the Notice of Availability of the filed document is current as of today's date.

Dated December 18, 2008, at San Francisco, California.

************** PARTIES **************

Marc D. Joseph
Attorney At Law
ADAMS, BROADWELL, JOSEPH & CARDOZO
601 GATEWAY BLVD., STE. 1000
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA 94080
(650) 589-1660
mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com

For: ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO ____________________________________________

James B. Young
Attorney At Law
AT&T CALIFORNIA
525 MARKET STREET, SUITE 1904
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 778-1420
jy2378@att.com


Tom Selhorst
AT&T CALIFORNIA
525 MARKET STREET, 2023
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 778-1482
thomas.selhorst@att.com


Anna Kapetanakos
Senior Attorney At Law
AT&T SERVICES INC.
525 MARKET STREET, ROOM 2024
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 778-1480
anna.kapetanakos@att.com

For: SBC CALIFORNIA ____________________________________________

Camille A. Estes
BOWEN LAW GROUP, LLP
235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 920
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94104
(415) 394-7500
camille.estes@bowenlawgroup.com


Karen Norene Mills
Attorney At Law
CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
2300 RIVER PLAZA DRIVE
SACRAMENTO CA 95833
(916) 561-5655
kmills@cfbf.com


John Gutierrez
Director Of Government Affairs
COMCAST PHONE OF CALIFORNIA LLC
12647 ALCOSTA BLVD., SUITE 200
SAN RAMON CA 94583
(925) 973-7214
john_gutierrez@cable.comcast.com


Mark P. Schreiber
Attorney At Law
COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, LLP
201 CALIFORNIA STREET, 17TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 765-6228
mschreiber@cwclaw.com


Patrick M. Rosvall
Attorney At Law
COOPER, WHITE & COOPER, LLP
201 CALIFORNIA STREET, 17TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 433-1900
smalllecs@cwclaw.com


W. Lee Biddle
Attorney At Law
FERRIS & BRITTON, P.C.
401 WEST A STREET, SUITE 1600
SAN DIEGO CA 92101
(619) 233-3131
lbiddle@ferrisbritton.com


Earl Nicholas Selby
Attorney At Law
LAW OFFICES OF EARL NICHOLAS SELBY
418 FLORENCE STREET
PALO ALTO CA 94301-1705
(650) 323-0990
ens@loens.com


John W. Leslie, Esq.
Attorney At Law
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS, LLP
11988 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO CA 92130
(858) 720-6352
jleslie@luce.com


Peter Vicencio
Customer Oper Supervisor
METROPCS, INC.
1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, 4TH FLOOR
ALAMEDA CA 94501
pvicencio@metropcs.com



Mary E. Wand
Attorney At Law
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 268-7000
mwand@mofo.com


Andrew L. Niven
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
PO BOX 7442
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120
(415) 973-6640
aln2@pge.com

For: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ____________________________________________

Jeff Wirtzfeld
Regulatory Contact
QWEST COMMUNICATION CORPORATION
1801 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 4700
DENVER CO 80202
(303) 896-5959
jeff.wirtzfeld@qwest.com


Ed Kolto
Attorney At Law
SBC PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
525 MARKET STREET, ROMM 2017
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 778-1485
Ed.kolto@att.com


Peter J. Messrobian
SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 16TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
(415) 781-7900
peter.messrobian@sdma.com

For: SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORGAN & ARNOLD ____________________________________________

Annette Gilliam
Attorney At Law
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
ROSEMEAD CA 91770
(626) 302-4880
annette.gilliam@sce.com

For: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ____________________________________________


Steven D. Patrick
Attorney At Law
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
555 WEST FIFTH STREET, GT14E7
LOS ANGELES CA 90013-1011
(213) 244-2954
spatrick@sempra.com

For: SAN DEIGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ____________________________________________

Andy W. Bettwy
Assistant General Counsel
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
5241 SPRING MOUNTAIN ROAD
LAS VEGAS NV 89150-0002
(702) 876-7107
andy.bettwy@swgas.com


Tim Day
Specialist/Pricing And Tariffs
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
5241 SPRING MOUNTAIN ROAD
LAS VEGAS NV 89150-0002
tim.day@swgas.com


Valerie J. Ontiveroz
Specialist/ State Regulatory Affairs
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION
5241 SPRING MOUNTAIN ROAD
LAS VEGAS NV 89193-8510
(702) 876-7323
valerie.ontiveroz@swgas.com


James Paine
Attorney At Law
STOEL RIVES, LLP
900 SW 5TH AVE STE. 2600
PORTLAND OR 97204-1268
(503) 294-9246

Glenn Stover
Attorney At Law
STOVER LAW
584 CASTRO ST., NO 199
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94114-2594
(415) 495-7000
glenn@stoverlaw.net


William Nusbaum
Attorney At Law
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
711 VAN NESS AVENUE, SUITE 350
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 929-8876
bnusbaum@turn.org





Laura J. Tudisco
Legal Division
RM. 5032
505 VAN NESS AVE
San Francisco CA 94102 3298
(415) 703-2164
ljt@cpuc.ca.gov


Rudolph M. Reyes
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
711 VAN NESS AVENUE, SUITE 300
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 749-5539
rudy.reyes@verizon.com


********** STATE EMPLOYEE ***********


Richard Clark
Consumer Protection & Safety Division
RM. 2205
505 VAN NESS AVE
San Francisco CA 94102 3298
(415) 703-2349
rwc@cpuc.ca.gov


Monica L. McCrary
Legal Division
RM. 5134
505 VAN NESS AVE
San Francisco CA 94102 3298
(415) 703-1288
mlm@cpuc.ca.gov


Anne E. Simon
Administrative Law Judge Division
RM. 5107
505 VAN NESS AVE
San Francisco CA 94102 3298
(415) 703-2014
aes@cpuc.ca.gov


Hallie Yacknin
Administrative Law Judge Division
RM. 5003
505 VAN NESS AVE
San Francisco CA 94102 3298
(415) 703-1675
hsy@cpuc.ca.gov


********* INFORMATION ONLY **********


Case Administration
2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
ROSEMEAD CA 91770
(626) 302-2810
case.admin@sce.com

For: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ____________________________________________

Edward G. Poole
Attorney At Law
ANDERSON & POOLE
601 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1300
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94108-2818
(415) 956-6413
epoole@adplaw.com


Jan Hewitt
AT&T CALIFORNIA
REGULATORY DEPT.
525 MARKET ST., ROOM 1803
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 778-1310
att-ca-complaints@att.com


Katy Lindsay
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
525 MARKET ST. 19TH FLOOR ABIDE 4
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 442-2938
klindsay@att.com


Margaret Felts
President
CALIFORNIA COMMUNICATIONS ASSN
1321 HOWE AVE. SUITE 202
SACRAMENTO CA 95825
(916) 567-6700
mcf@calcom.ws


Norman A. Pedersen
Attorney At Law
HANNA AND MORTON, LLP
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1500
LOS ANGELES CA 90071
(213) 430-2510
npedersen@hanmor.com


Library
HANSON BRIDGET MARCUS ET AL
333 MARKET ST., 23RD FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105

Chad Curran
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
77 BEALE STREET, MAIL CODE B9A
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
(415) 973-6105
crcq@pge.com

For: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ____________________________________________

Ann H. Kim
Attorney At Law
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
PO BOX 7442, MAIL CODE B30A
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120-7442
(415) 973-7467
ahk4@pge.com


Stephen Goodman
Cfo
PREPAID TEL. COM. INC.
409 CENTER STREET
YUBA CITY CA 95991
(530) 822-0326 400
sgoodman@primecompanies.com

For: PREPAID TEL COM. INC. ____________________________________________

Central Files
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
CP31-E
8330 CENTURY PARK COURT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
(858) 654-1148
centralfiles@semprautilities.com

For: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC ____________________________________________

Billie Overturf
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
CP32D
8330 CENTURY PARK COURT
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
BOverturf@semprautilities.com


Dan Dell'Osa
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER COMPANY
PO BOX 6010
11142 GARVEY AVENUE
EL MONTE CA 91733
dadellosa@sgvwater.com


Law Library (Sfll)
SBC WEST LEGAL DEPARTMENT
525 MARKET STREET, STE 2042
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105



Stephen H. Kukta
SPRINT NEXTEL
200 MISSION STREET, STE. 1500
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-1831
(415) 572-8358
stephen.h.kukta@sprint.com


Robert Kelly
SUBURBAN WATER SYSTEMS
1211 EAST CENTER COURT DRIVE
COVINA CA 91724-3603
(626) 966-2090
bobkelly@bobkelly.com


Marcel Hawiger
Attorney At Law
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
711 VAN NESS AVENUE, SUITE 350
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 929-8876 X311
marcel@turn.org


Matthew Freedman
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
711 VAN NESS AVENUE, NO. 350
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 825-8876
freedman@turn.org


Regina Costa
Research Director
THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK
711 VAN NESS AVENUE, SUITE 350
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102
(415) 929-8876 X312
rcosta@turn.org


Margaret L. Tobias
TOBIAS LAW OFFICE
460 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107
(415) 641-7833
marg@tobiaslo.com


Michael Shames
Attn: Michael Shames
UCAN
3100 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE B
SAN DIEGO CA 92103
(619) 696-6966
mshames@ucan.org

Jacque Lopez
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC
112 LAKEVIEW CANYON ROAD, CA501LB
THOUSAND OAKS CA 91362
(805) 372-6664
jacque.lopez@verizon.com



Lorriane Kocen
VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
CA501LS
112 S. LAKEVIEW CANYON ROAD
THOUSAND OAKS CA 91362
(805) 372-6945
lorraine.kocen@verizon.com


G. Mitchell Wilk
WILK & ASSOCIATES
201 MISSION STREET, STE 700
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-1000


 

(END OF SERVICE LIST)

Top Of Page