STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
January 29, 2010
TO PARTIES OF RECORD IN CASE 06-12-011 DECISION 10-01-029,
MAILED 12/28/2009.
On December 28, 2009, a Presiding Officer's Decision in this proceeding was mailed to all parties. Public Utilities Code Section 1701.2 and Rule 15.5(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures provide that the Presiding Officer's Decision becomes the decision of the Commission 30 days after its mailing unless an appeal to the Commission or a request for review has been filed.
No timely appeals to the Commission or requests for review have been filed. Therefore, the Presiding Officer's Decision is now the decision of the Commission.
The decision number is shown above.
/s/ KAREN V. CLOPTON
Karen V. Clopton, Chief
Administrative Law Judge
KVC:gd2
Attachment
ALJ/POD-KLK/gd2 Date of Issuance 1/29/2010
Decision 10-01-029 January 28, 2010
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Eric and Sandi Archibek, Complainants, vs. Southern California Edison Company, Defendant. |
Case 06-12-011 (Filed December 12, 2006) |
PRESIDING OFFICER'S DECISION FINDING IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
Eric Archibek, in pro per,
for Eric and Sandi Archibek
Walker A. Matthews, III, Attorney at Law,
for Southern California Edison Company
1. Summary
The subject complaint, regarding back-billing for electric service provided by Southern California Edison Company between 1998 and 2001 to a parcel of agricultural property, is denied. The complainants allege that Robert Kasner, the owner of the parcel during the above period, should be responsible for the back-billing. We find here that the complainants, as the customer of record during that period, are responsible for the bill. The initial amount of the disputed back-bill was approximately $103,000. The amount subsequently was modified to approximately $68,000. This proceeding is closed.
