7. Assignment of Proceeding

Michael R. Peevey is the assigned Commissioner and Burton W. Mattson is the assigned ALJ in this proceeding.

Findings of Fact

1. STC 6 is a Commission-required standard term and condition for RPS contracts, and some contracts include related terms to define commercially reasonable efforts.

2. Administration of an RPS contract includes administration of all clauses.

3. Utility contract enforcement is an integral part of utility contract administration.

4. Using more words than necessary, particularly when the proposed additional language is nuanced or subtle, can make dicta or findings vulnerable to misinterpretation or misunderstanding.

5. Ratepayers reasonably expect electricity delivered pursuant to RPS contracts, with very limited exception, to be RPS-eligible given the seller warrants throughout the term of the contract that (i) the project is an ERR and (ii) project output qualifies under the California RPS program.

6. The only exception to this electricity being RPS-eligible is in relationship to a change in law.

7. Ongoing achievement of RPS goals is too important for a utility buyer to passively accept that its purchases are RPS-compliant if and when they are not; and it is too important, in the case of a change in law, for the utility buyer to passively accept that seller has engaged in commercially reasonable efforts to comply with the change in law if and when that is not the case.

8. A utility buyer can devise reasonable ways to become informed with regard to violations of STC 6.

9. The categorization of this proceeding is ratesetting.

10. No hearing is necessary.

Conclusions of Law

1. The application to modify four resolutions should be granted in part by reverting to simpler, more direct language used in similar prior resolutions; modification of two resolutions adopted after the filing of this application should be accomplished herein; and the application should be denied in all other respects.

2. Each utility with an RPS obligation should devise a method to actively monitor each RPS seller's compliance with STC 6, administer that active monitoring, and make an affirmative showing in each ERRA (or other appropriate) proceeding of its active monitoring method and results; with the affirmative showing to be part of the utility's ERRA (or other appropriate) showing of its reasonable contract administration of all contract terms, inclusive of obligations both before and after the project's commercial operation date, as appropriate.

3. Disallowance of requested rate recovery is appropriate when the utility's showing relative to contract administration and active monitoring fail to establish that the utility's contract administration is reasonable through clear and convincing evidence.

4. The Commission neither expects nor requires unreasonable contract enforcement.

5. This decision should be effective immediately so that SCE may proceed with the affected contracts with increased certainty and without delay.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The application is granted in part and denied in all other respects. Six resolutions are modified as provided in Attachment A.

2. As part of its renewables portfolio standard program, Southern California Edison Company shall (a) devise a method to actively monitor each seller's compliance with Standard Term and Condition 6 and related contract terms, (b) administer that active monitoring, and (c) make an affirmative showing in each Energy Resource Recovery Account proceeding of its method for active monitoring and the results of that monitoring. This shall be part of Southern California Edison Company's showing of reasonable contract administration of all contract terms, inclusive of obligations both before and after the project's commercial operation date, as appropriate.

3. Each electric utility under the Commission's jurisdiction, pursuant to the renewables portfolio standard program, shall (a) devise a method to actively monitor each seller's compliance with Standard Term and Condition 6 and related contract terms, (b) administer that active monitoring, and (c) make an affirmative showing in each Energy Resource Recover Account (or other appropriate cost-recovery) proceeding of its method for active monitoring and the results of that monitoring. This shall be part of each electric utility's showing of reasonable contract administration of all contract terms, inclusive of obligations both before and after the project's commercial operation date, as appropriate. The Executive Director shall serve a copy of this order on the service list in Rulemaking 08-08-009, thereby performing service on each Commission-regulated electric utility with a renewables portfolio standard program obligation. These utilities are Southern California Edison Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, PacifiCorp, Sierra Pacific Power Company, Bear Valley Electric Service Division (a division of Golden State Water Company), and Mountain Utilities.

4. This proceeding is categorized as ratesetting and no hearing is necessary.

5. Application 10-03-009 is closed.

This order is effective today.

Dated June 3, 2010, at San Francisco, California.

ATTACHMENT A

MODIFICATIONS TO RESOLUTIONS

Resolutions E-4293, E-4263, E-4300, and E-4295 are modified as follows:

1. Language in Resolution E-4293 at 11 and 17 (Finding 10); Resolution E-4263 at 8 and 11 (Finding 10); Resolution E-4300 at 10 and 13 (Finding 13); and Resolution E-4295 at 10 and 13 (Finding 11) is changed as follows:

2. Language in Resolution E-4293 at 18 (Finding 16); Resolution E-4263 at 12 (Finding 12); Resolution E-4300 at 14 (Finding 15); and Resolution E-4295 at 14 (Finding 14) is changed as follows:

3. Language in Resolution E-4293 at 14; Resolution E-4263 at 9-10; Resolution E-4300 at 11; and Resolution E-4295 at 12 is changed as follows:

From:

4. Language in Resolution E-4316 at 12 (Finding 9) is changed as follows:

From:

To:

5. Language in Resolution E-4316 at 9 is changed as follows:

From:

To:

6. Language in Resolution E-4325 at 15 (Finding 12) is changed as follows:

From:

To:

7. Language in Resolution E-4325 at 2 is changed as follows:

From:

To:

8. Language in Resolution E-4325 at 11 is changed as follows:

From:

To:

9. Language in Resolution E-4325 at 15 (Finding 14) is changed as follows:

From:

To:

10. Language in Resolution E-4325 at 12-13 is changed as follows:

From:

To:

(END OF ATTACHMENT A)

Previous PageTop Of PageGo To First Page