Word Document PDF Document |
ALJ/HSY/avs Date of Issuance 8/6/2010
Decision 10-07-043 July 29, 2010
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application of Southern California Edison Company (U-338-E) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the San Joaquin Cross Valley Loop Transmission Project. |
Application 08-05-039 (filed May 30, 2008) |
DECISION GRANTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
TO CONSTRUCT THE SAN JOAQUIN CROSS VALLEY LOOP TRANSMISSION PROJECT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
DECISION GRANTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY 22
TO CONSTRUCT THE SAN JOAQUIN CROSS VALLEY LOOP TRANSMISSION PROJECT 22
2.1. Application and Protests 22
2.4. Evidentiary Hearings and Briefing 55
4. Public Convenience and Necessity 88
5. Description of Project Alternatives 99
6. Significant Environmental Impacts and Mitigation 1111
6.2. Agricultural Resources 1111
6.4. Biological Resources 1414
6.5. Unique Adverse Impacts (Alternative 3A) 1515
7. Environmental Superior Alternative 1515
8.1. Evaluation of Alternative 3A 1717
8.2. Analysis of Environmental Impacts 2020
8.3. Sufficiency of Mitigation Measures 2626
8.4. Identification of Environmentally Superior Alternative 3131
9. Infeasibility of Environmentally Superior Alternative 3232
Title Page
9.2. Additional Mitigation 3636
10. Overriding Considerations 3737
ATTACHMENT 1 - Mitigating Monitoring, Reporting and Compliance Program
ATTACHMENT 2 - SJXVL Mailing List
DECISION GRANTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
TO CONSTRUCT THE SAN JOAQUIN CROSS VALLEY LOOP TRANSMISSION PROJECT
This decision grants Southern California Edison Company a certificate of public convenience and necessity to construct the San Joaquin Cross Valley Loop Transmission Project, using the environmentally superior project Alternative 2 identified in the Environmental Impact Report. As the lead agency for environmental review of the project, we find that the Environmental Impact Report prepared for this project meets the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, and that there are overriding considerations that merit construction of the project notwithstanding its significant and unavoidable environmental impacts. We adopt a maximum project cost of $122.182 million, excluding allowances for funds used during construction. This proceeding is closed.