7. Assignment of Proceeding

John A. Bohn is the assigned Commissioner and Maribeth A. Bushey is the assigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding.

1. Based on previously filed comments and reply comments, as well as D.00-03-010, D.00-11-015, and GO 168, Part 4, Commission's Staff prepared a draft set of rules for California Billing Telephone Corporations, which the Assigned Commissioner mailed to all parties on February 12, 2010, along with an assigned Commissioner's Rule setting forth the procedural schedule for considering the draft rules and any proposals from the parties.

2. Comments on the proposed rules were received from 25 parties, and 18 parties filed reply comments.

3. The record in this proceeding shows that California telephone corporation subscribers continue to experience unauthorized charges on their telephone bills.

4. The person in possession of a wireless handset cannot reasonably be presumed to be the account subscriber, absent authorization from the subscriber for the Billing Telephone Corporation to place third-party charges on the subscriber's bill for the line served by the handset.

5. Disputing an unauthorized charge with the Billing Telephone Corporation is time-consuming and inconvenient, particularly for modest charges.

6. Unscrupulous Service Providers may place unauthorized charges on numerous subscriber bills, refund charges upon dispute, and retain all uncontested but unauthorized billings.

7. Billing Telephone Corporation subscribers should have the option of directing the Billing Telephone Corporation to place no third-party charges on the subscriber's bill.

8. Wireless providers are beginning to expand the types of third-party services available to subscribers.

9. The Commission should revisit the issue of whether subscribers should opt-in or opt-out of the ability to purchase services and content by third-party providers due to advances in the capabilities of wireless handsets and offerings by third-party service providers.

10. Subscribers should be informed that their bills are open to charges from third party service providers and that they have the option to block access at anytime and with no additional cost.

11. A subscriber cannot be presumed to authorize the placement of third-party charges on their telephone bill unless the subscriber is first informed that third-party charges may be placed on the bill and understands the consequences of allowing this to occur.

12. Billing Telephone Corporation subscribers who are aware that their bills are open to charges from other Service Providers may be more diligent in examining their bills for unauthorized charges.

13. The administrative burden of the reporting requirements can be eased in light of other directives to the Billing Telephone Corporations.

14. The Commission held legislative, not evidentiary, hearings when adopting GO 168.

1. California Billing Telephone Corporations may only bill for charges authorized by the subscriber, and the subscriber is the person or entity responsible for paying the invoice from the Billing Telephone Corporation.

2. A person in possession of a wireless handset is not necessarily the subscriber and actions by that person may not be presumed to constitute subscriber authorization.

3. No California Billing Telephone Corporation is required to offer billing services to third parties.

4. Billing Telephone Corporations should provide their subscribers with options to block or limit offerings by third-party service providers at no cost and to actively inform subscribers of these options.

5. Billing Telephone Corporations should remain fully responsible for refunding all unauthorized charges presented to subscribers in the Billing Telephone Corporations' bills, regardless of whether the subscribers unsuspectingly paid the charges.

6. The definition of subscriber as used in Pub. Util. Code §§ 2889.9 and 2890 includes persons lawfully in possession of a wireless handset where the subscriber has been informed by the Billing Telephone Corporation that the subscriber's line is open to third-party charges.

7. CTIA's alternate proposal does not comply with the requirements of Pub. Util. Code § 2889.9(d).

8. It is reasonable to use refunds to subscribers as a proxy for subscriber complaints.

9. The Director of the CPSD should be authorized to issue citations to any Billing Telephone Corporation or Billing Agent that fails to submit the quarterly report as required by the California Telephone Corporation Billing Rules in a complete and timely fashion as follows:

a. Up to 30 days late, a citation requiring payment of $500 to the General Fund;

b. 30 to 60 days late, a citation requiring payment of $5,000 to the General Fund;

c. No less than 10 days before issuing a citation, the Director shall give the Billing Telephone Corporation or Billing Agent notice of the impending citation and an opportunity to submit the report; and

d. The Commission may also take such further actions as may be necessary to protect the public interest.

10. The Commission should exercise its remedial statutory authority granted pursuant to Pub. Util. Code § 2889.9(b) over Billing Agents and Service Providers using the billing services of California Telephone Corporations.

11. The Public Utilities Code provides the Commission comprehensive authority over the billing practices of California Telephone Corporations.

12. Safeguarding the rights of consumers requires that California Billing Telephone Corporations, Billing Agents, and Service Providers comply with the California Telephone Corporation Billing Rules.

13. The California Telephone Corporation Billing Rules, Attachment A to today's decision, should be adopted as Revised GO 168, Part 4.

14. Safeguarding the rights of consumers requires that the Commission's staff supervise the availability of enhanced consumer education materials at the CalPhoneInfo web site.

15. Safeguarding the rights of consumers requires that the carriers meet as necessary with the Commission's staff to review and update consumer education materials in the carrier's tariffs, web sites and customer information.

16. Safeguarding the rights of consumers requires the carriers to expand and enhance the availability of useful information on third-party billing, including not to dispute and block such charges, to all consumers.

17. No evidentiary hearings are required.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The California Telephone Corporation Billing Rules attached to this decision as Attachment A are adopted as Revised General Order 168, Part 4. All Billing Telephone Corporations, Billing Agents, and Service Providers must comply therewith at the earliest practicable date but in no event later than 90 days after the effective date of this order.

2. The Communications Division staff must prepare a report, in collaboration with the Consumer Protection and Safety Division, on developments in the wireless industry, including new types of offerings by third-party providers beyond Premium short messaging services. The report must include findings on whether the cramming rules adopted by this decision sufficiently protect customers from unauthorized charges. This report shall be prepared and served on parties to this proceeding by no later than January 1, 2013.

3. All Billing Telephone Corporations who offer third-party billing and collection services shall cooperate with the Telecommunications Division and the Consumer Protection and Safety Division and participate in meetings and workshops for the purpose of developing materials to educate consumers on how to avoid having unauthorized charges placed on bills. The workshops shall not only develop content for the CalPhoneInfor web site maintained by the Commission, but also shall discuss actions taken by the Billing Telephone Corporations to inform consumers of the ability to block third-party services and their related charges. Such workshops must occur no less than once each calendar quarter for the first year after the effective date of this decision and no less than annually thereafter. The consumer information must contain clear and concise descriptions of third-party billing, specific steps to dispute an unauthorized charge, a summary of the responsibilities of a Billing Telephone Corporation, comprehensive information on means to block or limit such charges and such other information as the Commission may require to safeguard the rights of consumers. All carriers offering third-party billing services must participate in such workshops.

4. Rulemaking 00-02-004 is closed.

This order is effective today.

Dated October 28, 2010, at San Francisco, California.

ATTACHMENT A

Revised General Order 168, Part 4

California Telephone Corporation Billing Rules

1. Applicability:

2. Definitions:

2.1. Billing Agents: Any entity which provides billing services for Service Providers directly or indirectly through a Billing Telephone Corporation.

2.2. Complaint: Any written or oral communication from a Subscriber alleging that an unauthorized charge was included in the Billing Telephone Corporation's bill to the Subscriber.

2.3. Service Provider: A person or entity, other than a Billing Telephone Corporation, that originates the charge or charges that are billed to the Subscriber of the Billing Telephone Corporation.

2.4. Billing Telephone Corporation: A telephone corporation that bills a Subscriber for products and services.

2.5. Telephone Corporation: Any telephone corporation (as defined in Pub. Util. Code § 234) operating within California. This term includes resellers and wireless telephone service providers.

2.6. Unauthorized Charge: Any charge placed upon a Subscriber's telephone bill for a service or goods that the Subscriber did not agree to purchase, including any charges that resulted from false, misleading, or deceptive representations. Charges that relate to a change in a subscriber's selection of a provider of telecommunications service are excluded from these rules and are subject to Part 3 (Rules Governing Slamming Complaints) of this General Order.

2.7. Subscriber: Either one of the following:

2.8. Investigation: An inquiry conducted by (i) the person or entity from which the disputed charge originated, (ii) a Billing Telephone Corporation, (iii) the Commission, or (iv) any other relevant government agency, such as the District Attorney's office in the Subscriber's county or the State Attorney General.

3. Authorization Required:

4. Billing for Authorized Charges Only:

5. Responsibilities of Billing Telephone Corporations:

6. Monitoring of Subscriber Billings:

Previous PageTop Of PageNext PageGo To First Page