Word Document PDF Document

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

505 VAN NESS AVENUE

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298

December 13, 2010

TO PARTIES OF RECORD IN CASE 09-11-001, DECISION 10-12-022

On November 9, 2010, a Presiding Officer's Decision in this proceeding was mailed to all parties. Public Utilities Code Section 1701.2 and Rule 15.5(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure provide that the Presiding Officer's Decision becomes the decision of the Commission 30 days after its mailing unless an appeal to the Commission or a request for review has been filed.

No timely appeals to the Commission or requests for review have been filed. Therefore, the Presiding Officer's Decision is now the decision of the Commission.

The decision number is shown above.

/s/ KAREN V. CLOPTON

Karen V. Clopton, Chief

Administrative Law Judge

KVC:jt2

Attachment

ALJ/KK3-POD/jt2 Date of Issuance 12/13/2010

Decision 10-12-022 December 10, 2010

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Nash Dweik,

          Complainant,

      vs.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U39E),

          Defendant.

Case 09-11-001

(Filed November 3, 2009)

    Nash Dweik, for Self.

    Michael Klotz, Attorney at Law, for Pacific Gas and Electric Company.

DECISION DENYING COMPLAINT

1 Summary

Nash Dweik (Complainant) filed a complaint against Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) on November 3, 2009, seeking an order directing PG&E to install a transformer on a pole in front of his property; to reconvert certain distribution lines to provide power to an agricultural well; and to reconnect the agricultural well as it was prior to disconnection by PG&E.

We find that PG&E's design and installation of a new residential electric service extension to Complainant's residence satisfies the requirements of Electric Rule 16 - Service Extensions. Complainant failed to prove that he has ever been a customer of record for the agricultural well or that he applied for electric service to the well. PG&E is, therefore, not obligated to provide electric service to the well unless and until Complainant applies for service.

The complaint is denied and the proceeding is closed.

Top Of PageNext PageGo To First Page