6. Comments on the Proposed Decision

The proposed decision (PD) of ALJ Wetzell in this matter was mailed to the parties in accordance with Section 311 of the Public Utilities Code and comments were allowed under Rule 14.3 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments were filed by the CAISO, CCA/Direct Access Parties, CCSF, CMUA, Joint Parties, and Shell Energy. Reply comments were filed by CCA/Direct Access Parties, CCSF, Joint Parties, and Shell Energy.

In response to the comments and replies, we have made several non-substantive revisions to the PD that do not affect the recommended outcome, i.e., approval of the Proposed Settlement. In addition, as discussed in Section 4.3.4 above, we have made one substantive change: where the PD adopted the alternative cost allocation method set forth in Section 13.1.2.1 of the Term Sheet, we instead adopt the alternative method set forth in Section 13.1.2.2 of the Term Sheet.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext PageGo To First Page