IV. CONCLUSION

Rehearing is granted on the limited issue of GHG compliance costs, and modifications to D.10-12-055, as described herein, shall be made: (1) modify our treatment of GHG compliance costs to be consistent with avoided cost principles;
(2) clarify why the MPR-based energy price adopted by D.09-12-042 and affirmed in D.10-12-055 is consistent with avoided cost principles; (3) clarify why the 10% Location Bonus is consistent with avoided cost principles, and (4) conform D.09-12-042 with the modifications ordered by D.10-04-055 and D.10-12-055, as modified herein. Rehearing of D.10-12-055, as modified, is denied. We also deny the Joint Utilities' motion for stay as without merit.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Rehearing of D.10-12-055 is granted for the limited purpose of addressing greenhouse gas compliance cost issues.

3. Rehearing of D.10-12-055, as modified herein, is denied.

4. The motion for stay of D.10-12-055 is denied.

5. The Joint Utilities shall submit supplemental advice letters to amend the tariff sheets and contracts associated with the AB 1613 program consistent with the holdings in this order within 30 calendar days of the effective date of this order.

6. For clarity and for the convenience of the parties and the general public, we hereby adopt the "Conformed" Versions of D.10-12-055 and D.09-12-042, attached hereto as Attachments A and B, respectively. These conformed versions of D.10-12-055 and D.09-12-042 incorporate all modifications ordered by subsequent decisions in this proceeding, including this order, with the exception of those modifications ordered by D.10-04-055 to D.09-12-042 which are superseded here. To the extent modifications ordered result in express conflicts among the decisions in this proceeding, the holdings of the last in time decision shall control with the exception that the discussions set forth in Sections 5, 9, 10, and 11 of D.10-12-055 are not intended to be modified and stand as written.

7. To the extent that the AB 1613 contracts require further amendments to be consistent with the Commission's decisions in this proceeding, Energy Division is authorized to address such amendments through the resolution and advice letter process.

///

///

///

Dated April 14, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

  Commissioners

Previous PageTop Of PageGo To First Page