Discussion

In compliance with Decision (D.) 09-08-028, Southern California Edison Company (SCE) filed Application (A.) 10-09-002, in which it requested approval of its dynamic pricing rates. In order to address all current SCE rate design issues in one coordinated proceeding, and more efficiently use the valuable time of the parties and the Commission, the assigned Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) directed SCE, via a ruling issued on May 16, 2011, to include its proposal for dynamic pricing rates in its 2012 rate design application. In this way, all rate design issues, including that of dynamic pricing, would be addressed in the same proceeding. In the same ruling, the assigned ALJ also ruled that A.10-09-002 would be dismissed without prejudice unless parties to this application stated opposition within 10 days after the 2012 rate design application was filed. SCE filed its 2012 rate design application (A.11-06-007) on June 6, 2011.

Since SCE proposed dynamic pricing rates in its 2012 rate design application and no party stated opposition to dismissal of A.10-09-002, we therefore dismiss A.10-09-002 without prejudice.