We have considered exemptions of URF ILECs from Public Utilities (Pub. Util.) Code Section 8514 in two recent proceedings (Application (A.) 06-07-026 and R.09-05-006). In both proceedings, we granted partial exemptions, neither of which included an exemption from the requirement that an URF ILEC request authority to encumber all assets for securing indebtedness.
In A.06-07-026, AT&T requested authority for full exemption from § 851 for the disposition or encumbrance of utility assets. SureWest and Verizon supported this application and requested that the exemption requested by AT&T apply to all URF ILECs.5 Even though the responding ILECs favored full exemption, they were willing to accept CLEC/non-dominant interexchange carrier (NDIEC)-equivalent treatment as an interim measure.6 In D.07-11-048 in that proceeding, we denied the request by AT&T for full exemption from § 851's encumbrance requirement, but extended relief from the requirements of § 851 subject to certain limitations, to all of the URF ILECs.7 We also deferred consideration of full exemption by URF ILECs from § 851 to a future rulemaking.
In R.09-05-006, we considered, among other issues, the full exemption of both mid-size and large URF ILECs from § 851 with regard to the disposition or encumbrance of necessary and useful utility assets.8 In its opening comments regarding the scope of R.09-05-006, SureWest supported exemption of URF ILECs from § 851. By D.10-05-019, we granted URF ILECs further exemptions from § 851 with respect to the disposition of certain non-controversial assets, but did not grant them full exemption from § 851 regarding encumbrance of assets.9
4 For the remainder of this decision Pub. Util. Code § 851 will be referred to as "§ 851."
5 See D.07-11-048 at 2.
6 See D.85-11-044 for NDIEC authority and D.97-01-015 for CLEC authority.
7 See D.07-11-048 at Ordering Paragraph 2.
8 See R.09-05-006 at 1 and 7. Also considered exemption by CLECs and NDIECs from Pub. Util. Code § 851.
9 See D.10-05-019 at 2.