Word Document PDF Document

ALJ/SAW/hl2 Mailed 12/16/2005

Decision 05-12-026 December 15, 2005

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Proposed Policies and Programs Governing post-2003 Low Income Assistance Programs.

Rulemaking 04-01-006

(Filed January 8, 2004)

Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 M) For Approval of the 2006 and 2006 California Alternative Rates for Energy and Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs and Budget.

Application 05-06-005

(Filed June 1, 2005)

Southern California Edison Company's (U 388-E) Application Regarding Low Income Assistance Programs for Program Years 2006 and 2007.

Application 05-06-009

(Filed June 1, 2005)

Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) for Approval of Low Income Assistance Programs and Budgets for Program Years 2006 and 2006.

Application 05-06-012

(Filed June 1, 2005)

Application of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902 M) for Approval of Low Income Assistance Programs and Budgets for Program Years 2006 and 2006.

Application 05-06-013

(Filed June 1, 2005)

OPINION APPROVING 2006-2007 LOW INCOME PROGRAMS
AND FUNDING FOR THE LARGER ENERGY UTILITIES
AND APPROVING NEW LOW INCOME ENERGY EFFICIENCY
PROGRAM MEASURES FOR 2006

OPINION APPROVING 2006-2007 LOW INCOME PROGRAMS
AND FUNDING FOR THE LARGER ENERGY UTILITIES AND
APPROVING NEW LOW INCOME ENERGY EFFICIENCY
PROGRAM MEASURES FOR 2006 2

I. Summary 2

II. Procedural Background 5

III. Discussion 8

IV. Assignment of Proceeding 34

V. Comments on Draft Decision 34

VI. Conclusion 34

Findings of Fact 35

Conclusions of Law 37

ORDER 38

OPINION APPROVING 2006-2007 LOW INCOME PROGRAMS AND FUNDING FOR THE LARGER ENERGY UTILITIES AND APPROVING NEW
LOW INCOME ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM MEASURES FOR 2006

I. Summary

In this decision, we approve low income program funding for 2006 and 2007 for the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), the Southern California Edison Company (SCE), the San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), and the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). The programs include the California Alternative Rates for Energy (CARE) Program, and the Low Income Energy Efficiency Program. We adopt the funding levels as proposed, with the exception of SDG&E's request to shift $900,000 from natural gas Low Income Energy Efficiency activities to electric. Instead, we direct SDG&E to maintain its current emphasis on the installation of natural gas efficiency measures. In addition, we approve new measures (central air conditioner replacement as well as duct testing and sealing) to be included in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Program. We approve the following funding for 2006:

 

TABLE 1

2006 AUTHORIZED CARE BUDGETS

         
 

PG&E

SCE

SoCalGas

SDG&E

Outreach

$4,837,000

$1,633,000

$2,177,495

$1,319,473

Automatic Enrollment

150,000

60,000

10,000

13,136

Cool Centers

 

95,000

   

Proc., Certification & Verification

1,600,000

600,000

990,223

258,168

Bill System / Programming

150,000

557,000

301,218

335,050

Measurement & Evaluation

150,000

58,000

5,000

3,000

Regulatory Compliance

170,000

50,000

189,289

154,553

General Administration

300,000

1,063,000

351,024

210,638

Low Income Oversight Board

       

CPUC Energy Division

100,000

82,000

83,000

52,500

Total CARE Expenses

$7,457,000

$4,199,000

$4,107,249

$2,346,519

Subsidies & Benefits

$324,612,000

$168,100,000

$95,036,000

$34,499,414

Total Program Costs and Discounts

$332,069,000

$172,299,000

$99,143,249

$36,845,932

TABLE 2 1

2006 AUTHORIZED LOW-INCOME ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM BUDGETS

           
   

PG&E

SCE

SoCalGas

SDG&E

ENERGY EFFICIENCY

       
 

Gas Appliances

$2,386,000

$0

$5,578,600

$1,468,402

 

Electric Appliances

19,593,000

20,971,520

0

5,084.051

 

Weatherization

15,283,000

394,450

16,757,491

3,630,363

 

Outreach / Assessment / Marketing

3,129,000

2,817,745

4,830,000

 
 

In-Home Energy Education

3,129,000

518,400

630,000

1,371,341

 

Education Workshops

$0

 

420,000

132,000

Energy Efficiency Total

$43,520,000

$24,702,115

$28,216,091

$11,686,157

           

LANDLORD CO PAYS

       
 

Air Conditioner Replacement - Central

       
 

Air Conditioner Replacement - Room

$10,000

     
 

Refrigerator (CoPay)

100,000

     

Landlord Co Pays Total

$110,000

$0

$0

 
           

PILOTS

       
 

Cool Center 3

       
 

Cool Zones

       
           
 

LIHEAP Leveraging

       

Pilots Total

$0

$0

$0

 
           

OTHER PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

       
 

Training Center

$400,000

20,000

76,259

 
 

Inspections

$3,500,000

555, 000

1,901,220

161,832

 

Advertising

 

15,000

156,000

404,914

 

Measurement & Evaluation (M&E)

540,000

195,000

113,030

62,250

 

Regulatory Compliance

521,000

70,000

267,298

281,043

 

Other Administration

7,904,000

$1,772,885

2,554,977

750,897

Other Program Activities Total

 

$2,627,885

$5,068,784

$1,660,936

           

Oversight Costs - CPUC Energy Division

$35,000

$70,000

$40,000

21,000

           

TOTAL AUTHORIZED LIEE BUDGET

$56,530,000

$27,400,000

$33,324,875

$13,368,093

           

This decision comes soon after our recent actions to offer greater protection to low income customers from the effects of high natural gas prices this winter. On October 27, 2005, the Commission issued Decision (D.) 05-10-044, which, among other things, expanded income eligibility for the CARE program from 175% of the Federal poverty guidelines to 200%. It also defined income eligibility for the Low Income Energy Efficiency Program in the same manner. Previously, customers with income between 175% and 200% of the Federal poverty guidelines could only participate if they were elderly or disabled. In that decision, we also permitted the use of creative efforts such as census-block targeted enrollment campaigns and approved proposals to expedite the delivery of certain energy efficiency measures to low income customers.

The utilities could not have anticipated the changes adopted in D.05-10-044 when they filed the applications underlying this decision. However, the utilities have asked the Commission to approve the proposed 2006-2007 funding levels set forth in their applications with the understanding that they may have to seek funding augmentations if program activity continues to accelerate. We approve the overall funding requests and order that these funding levels continue in effect until a subsequent decision of the Commission approving new funding levels.

While approving the proposed funding levels and programs, we recognize that the utilities we are in the midst of a season of change related to the low income programs. The Commission has expanded CARE eligibility and approved efforts to speed up the installation of the most cost-effective energy efficiency measures. In this Decision, we approve new measures to be included in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Program. We anticipate the release of the long-awaited Needs Assessment that will help the utilities identify the portions of the low income community that are underserved. The Governor recently signed Senate Bill (SB) 580 which, among other things, requires that the State take additional steps to pursue automatic enrollment for CARE. These events prompt another look at overall programs and funding, including reconsideration of the current approach to planning Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs.

The applications before us, here, reflect the current utility practice of planning Low Income Energy Efficiency Program activities around a budget, rather than budgeting to achieve specific energy efficiency or penetration goals. We want each utility to establish, and work to achieve, penetration goals (with the assistance of the Needs Assessment results and each utility's direct program experience). We also want to bring the utility low income program cycle into sync with that of the more general energy efficiency programs, which are in the midst of a three-year program cycle, scheduled to terminate at the end of 2008.

For all these reasons, we direct the utilities to file new applications by July 1, 2006 to propose program and funding changes for 2007 and 2008. In the meantime, however, in this Decision, we approve funding for the 2006-2007 program cycle, which shall be the basis for utility programs until the Commission adopts changes resulting from the July 2006 applications. Further, in order to avoid a sudden drop in program activity after the winter, we direct the utilities to file augmented 2006 budget applications no later than April 14, 2005, to enable the utilities to treat at least 5-10% more homes than they projected in the current applications. In response to these applications, we will consider the reasonableness of adopting the proposed augmentations.

1 Revised Table 2 also incorporates the reallocation of SDG&E's LIEE Program Budget as directed by the Ordering Paragraph 14 of the Draft Decision

Top Of PageNext PageGo To First Page