9. Comments on Proposed Decision

The proposed decision of Commissioner Michael R. Peevey in this matter was mailed to the parties in accordance with Section 311 of the Public Utilities Code and Rule 14.3 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments were filed by A WISH, CCSE, Disability Rights Advocates, Greenlining, Grid Alternatives, PG&E, SCE, and jointly by the Solar Alliance and the California Solar Energy Industries Association (CALSEIA).²⁵ Energy Division also received a letter dated November 6, 2007, containing comments from CSD. Reply comments were filed by A WISH, CCSE, Fat Spaniel Technologies Inc., Greenlining, Grid Alternatives, PG&E, SCE, SDG&E and jointly by the Solar Alliance and CALSEIA.

The comments suggested minor adjustments and corrections to the decision, which are incorporated throughout. Where comments reargued earlier positions or attempted to present new arguments or facts, they were not considered.

²⁵ The Solar Alliance is an alliance of solar manufacturers, integrators, and installers. CALSEIA is a non-profit trade association representing over 200 solar companies doing business in California.