To guide PHC discussions and assist the assigned Commissioner in preparation of the Scoping Memo, we will provide for the filing of PHC statements (served on the temporary service list), which should address the following:
· Identification of the party and interest of the party in this proceeding. (See Rule 1.4 (b).)
· Any objections to or recommendations regarding this order's determinations as to categorization of the proceeding as ratesetting, the need for hearing, issues to be considered, or scheduling. (See Rule 6.2.)
· Priorities of issues to be considered.
We anticipate that a significant portion of the issues can be aired and resolved through workshops. However, certain aspects of this proceeding may involve contested factual issues for which evidentiary hearings may be required. The preliminary schedule set forth below provides for workshops in May and June of this year and hearings in August. As noted earlier, we intend to process Phase 1 by the end of the year.
Phase I of PRM OIR - Preliminary Schedule
April 10, 2008 |
OIR issued |
April 25, 2008 |
PHC Statements filed |
May __, 2008 |
PHC to be set by ALJ |
May __, 2008 |
Scoping Memo |
May __, 2008 |
Workshops begin. |
June __, 2008 |
Workshops concluded |
July __, 2008 |
Ruling on scope of evidentiary hearings |
July __, 2008 |
Prepared testimony served |
Aug. __, 2008 |
Rebuttal testimony served |
Aug. __, 2008 |
Evidentiary hearings begin |
Aug. __, 2008 |
Evidentiary hearings end |
Sept. __, 2008 |
Opening briefs/comments filed |
Oct. __, 2008 |
Reply Briefs/comments filed |
Nov. 18, 2008 |
Proposed decision |
Dec. 8, 2008 |
Comments on proposed decision |
Dec. 15, 2008 |
Reply comments on proposed decision |
Dec. 18, 2008 |
Final decision |
This proceeding will conform to the statutory case management deadline for ratesetting matters set forth in Pub. Util. Code § 1701.5. In particular, it is our intention to resolve all relevant issues within 24 months of the date of the assigned Commissioner's Scoping Memo for each phase. In using the authority granted in § 1701.5(b) to set a time longer than 18 months, we consider the number and complexity of the tasks, the need to coordinate with other proceedings, and the need to coordinate with the processes and role of the CEC and the CAISO.