2. Requirements for Awards of Compensation

The intervenor compensation program, which is set forth in Pub. Util. Code §§ 1801-1812,4 requires California jurisdictional utilities to pay the reasonable costs of an intervenor's participation if that party makes a substantial contribution to the Commission's proceedings. The statute provides that the utility may adjust its rates to collect the amount awarded from its ratepayers.

All of the following procedures and criteria must be satisfied for an intervenor to obtain a compensation award:

In the discussion below, the procedural issues in Items 1-4 above are combined and a separate discussion of Items 5-6 follows.

Under § 1804(a)(1) and Rule 17.1(a)(1), a customer who intends to seek an award of intervenor compensation must file an NOI before certain dates.

In a proceeding in which a PHC is held, the intervenor must file and serve its NOI between the date the proceeding was initiated until 30 days after the PHC is held. (Rule 17.1(a)(1).) The PHC in this matter was held on February 28, 2006. Aglet timely filed its NOI on March 30, 2006.

On November 15, 2005, an ALJ ruling, issued in Application 05-06-006 et al., found that Aglet met the financial hardship condition, pursuant to § 1802(g). That ruling creates a rebuttable presumption of eligibility for Aglet, pursuant to § 1804(b)(1) because it met the financial hardship condition in another proceeding within one year of the commencement of this proceeding.

Section 1802(b)(1) defines a "customer" as: (A) a participant representing consumers, customers or subscribers of a utility; (B) a representative who has been authorized by a customer; or (C) a representative of a group or organization authorized pursuant to its articles of incorporation or bylaws to represent the interests of residential or small business customers. (§ 1802(b)(1)(A) through (C).) On April 24, 2008, the Commission issued D.08-04-053 that found Aglet a customer pursuant to § 1802(b)(1)(C).

Regarding the timeliness of the request for compensation, Aglet filed its request for compensation on November 6, 2007, within 60 days of D.07-09-044 being issued.5 No party opposed the request. In view of the above, we find that Aglet has satisfied all the procedural requirements necessary to make its request for compensation in this proceeding.

4 All subsequent statutory references are to the Public Utilities Code unless otherwise indicated.

5 D.07-09-044 was issued on September 21, 2007, one day after it was adopted on September 20, 2007.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext PageGo To First Page