8. Outstanding Motions

Most of the motions made in this proceeding have been addressed by the assigned Commissioner or ALJ, and we affirm all of the prior rulings.

On October 10, 2008, the due date for reply briefs and the date this case was submitted, UCA and NFSR submitted a joint motion to supplement the testimony of one of its witnesses, or the record in this proceeding, with additional information regarding recent rail accidents that occurred at various locations throughout the state. Expo Authority opposed the motion, stating that the information is not relevant, outside the scope of the proceeding, and late. We agree with Expo Authority on all points and, therefore, summarily deny the motion.

All other outstanding motions not previously addressed also are denied.