6. Comments on Draft Decision

On May 30, 2006, the draft decision was filed and served on parties in accordance with Pub. Util. Code § 311(g)(1) and Rule 77.7 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments were filed on June 19, 2006 by Aglet, AReM, CAISO, CMTA/CLECA, CCSF, Constellation, DRA, IEP, Mirant, NRG, PG&E, SDG&E, Sempra Global, SCE, TURN, Calpine Corporation, Cogeneration Association of California (CAC), and the Northern California Power Agency. Replies were filed on June 26, 2006 by Aglet, AReM, CAC, CAISO, CMUA, Constellation, IEP, NRG, PG&E, SCE, and TURN.

We have made several revisions to the ALJ's draft decision in response to the comments, including but not limited to revisions to the provision for aggregation of local areas in PG&E's territory, adjustments to the Local RAR/RMR coordination schedule, clarification of penalties for non-compliance, and clarification of and modification to the provision for waivers.