2. Background

D.04-10-035 provided definition and clarification with respect to the RAR policy framework adopted in D.04-01-050, identified remaining implementation issues to be resolved in further proceedings, and outlined the procedural steps to be undertaken in Phase 2 of the RAR portion of this proceeding to ensure that a functioning RAR program for can be implemented during 2005. Pursuant to the direction given in D.04-10-035, Commission advisory staff, along with California Energy Commission (CEC) staff acting in an advisory capacity, facilitated 19 workshops between November 2004 and April 2005. Staff filed and served its Phase 2 workshop report on June 10, 2005.1

With the issuance of the Phase 2 workshop report, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) established a schedule for comments and replies to comments on the Phase 2 workshop report. The ALJ provided notice to parties that Phase 2 would be submitted to the Commission on the record which consists of the workshop report and the comments and replies thereon. As set forth in the following table, 24 sets of opening comments and 15 sets of reply comments were submitted.

COMMENTING PARTIES2

 

Commenting Party or Parties

Short Title for Party or Parties

Opening Comments

Reply Comments

1

Alliance for Retail Energy Markets

AReM

X

X

2

APS Energy Services

APSES

X

 

3

California Independent System Operator

CAISO

X

X

4

California Electricity Oversight Board

CEOB

X

 

5

California Large Energy Consumers Association and California Manufacturers & Technology Association

CLECA/

CMTA

X

 

6

Calpine Corporation

Calpine

X

X

7

City and County of San Francisco

CCSF

 

X

8

Cogeneration Association of California and Energy Producers and Users Coalition

CAC/EPUC

X

 

9

Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc. and Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.

Constellation

X

X

10

Department of Water Resources-CERS

DWR-CERS

X

X

11

Department of Water Resources-State Water Project and State Water Contractors

SWP/SWC

X

 

12

Duke Energy North America, LLC

DENA

X

X

13

FPL Energy, LLC

FPLE

X

 

14

Independent Energy Producers Association

IEP

X

X

15

Mirant California LLC, Mirant Delta LLC, and Mirant Potrero LLC; and West Coast Power

Mirant/WCP

X

 

16

Office of Ratepayer Advocates

ORA

X

X

17

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

PG&E

X

X

18

Powerex Corp.

Powerex

X

X

19

San Diego Gas & Electric Company

SDG&E

X

 

20

Sempra Global

Sempra Global

X

X

21

Silicon Valley Leadership Group (formerly the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group)

SVLG

X

 

22

Southern California Edison Company

SCE

X

X

23

Southern California Water Company

SCWC

X

 

24

The Utility Reform Network

TURN

X

X

25

SCE, PG&E, AReM, CLECA, CMTA, TURN, and ORA (AReM and CMTA did not join in Joint Parties' reply comments)

Joint Parties

X

X

1 The Phase 2 workshop report can be obtained at the following internet link:

http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/REPORT/46914.PDF

2 DWR-CERS submitted comments and replies by memorandum to the ALJ. CAISO and CMTA also filed supplemental comments with authorization by the ALJ.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext PageGo To First Page